Abstract
Atrazine (ATZ) is an environmental pollutant that interferes with several aspects of mammalian cellular processes including germ cell development, immunological, reproductive and neurological functions. At the level of human exposure, ATZ reduces sperm count and contribute to infertility in men. ATZ also induces morphological changes similar to apoptosis and initiates mitochondria-dependent cell death in several experimental models. When in vitro experimental models are exposed to ATZ, they are faced with increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), cytotoxicity and decreased growth rate at dosages that may vary with cell types. This results in differing cytotoxic responses that are influenced by the nature of target cells, assay types and concentrations of ATZ. However, oxidative stress could play salient role in the observed cellular and genetic toxicity and apoptosis-like effects which could be abrogated by antioxidant vitamins and flavonoids, including vitamin E, quercetin, kolaviron, myricetin and bioactive extractives with antioxidant effects. This review focuses on the differential responses of cell types to ATZ toxicity, testicular effects of ATZ in both in vitro and in vivo models and chemopreventive strategies, so as to highlight the current state of the art on the toxicological outcomes of ATZ exposure in several experimental model systems.
1 Introduction
Atrazine (ATZ; 2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine) is a triazine herbicide that is used to control the growth of broadleaf and grassy weeds. Atrazine is commonly spread pre-emergence to maize, coffee, sorghum, sugarcane, wheat, in conifer forests, on golf courses, on Christmas tree farms and household lawns. Currently, ATZ and related triazines are one the most extensively utilized agricultural herbicides in the world and the most frequently patronized herbicide in Nigeria (), and with an annual production of over 36,000 tonnes (Jablonowski et al., 2011; ). The extensive use of ATZ has given rise to its detection in the environment, largely in surface and groundwater (Goldman, 1994; Owagboriaye et al., 2022) and in maize plants (Santos-Hernández et al., 2018; Yu et al., 2021). ATZ at a concentration of 0.2 ppb has been detected in 2–3 million people who use groundwater as their main source of drinking water (Goldman, 1994), as such ATZ has been given a sizeable deal of scientific audit by both governmental and scholarly researchers. ATZ can be found in the environment at concentrations as substantial as 21 ppb in groundwater, 42 ppb in surface waters, 102 ppb in water basins in farm areas, and up to 224 ppb in streams (Kolpin et al., 1998; Owagboriaye et al., 2022; Roh et al., 2023). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has set the maximal limit of ATZ allowed in drinking water (MCL) at 3 ppb and has designated ATZ as a Restricted Use Pesticide in an attempt to minimize human exposure to ATZ through drinking contaminated groundwater (Costa Silva et al., 2010; Powell et al., 2011). However, in occupational set-up, humans are exposed to ATZ at a thousand-fold higher concentration than seen in residential exposure. Because triazine herbicides are dominantly applied to the maize cropping fields, the European legislation has set the maximum residue level for ATZ in corn as 0.25 mg kg−1 (Elvis et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2021). In fact, ATZ is thought to be highly selective for maize, since their roots could efficiently metabolize ATZ to OH-atrazine; and the formation of glutathione conjugates in the aerial parts of the plant (Tasli et al., 1996). Evidence from epidemiological reports have also indicated a plausible connection between exposure to ATZ-containing agrochemicals in workers handling the herbicide and an upsurge of diverse neoplastic diseases (Schroeder et al., 2001; Hopenhayn-Rich et al., 2002; ). Because of its unacceptable levels on groundwater, ATZ use was restricted in the European Union in 2004 (Zeljezic et al., 2006; Ackerman, 2007). However, ATZ-containing formulations have continued to be produced for export in some European member states (United Kingdom, Spain, Portugal and Ireland). In Africa and other developing countries where there are weak policies on agrochemicals usage and disposal, the contamination of drinking waters might even be higher. As a result of this and the constancy of ATZ in groundwater, segments of the European and African populations will still be brought into contact with this active ingredient. Although the strict ranking of ATZ as an endocrine disrupting compound has been discussed, a lot of sequelae on living organisms have been suggested (Solomon, 2009).
The endocrine disrupting effects of ATZ in birds, reptiles, fish, amphibians and mammals (; Hayes et al., 2003; Fan et al., 2008; Zaya et al., 2011; ); immunotoxic properties (; Thompson et al., 2015) and effects on sperm qualities in animals at low exposure levels have been reported (Saalfeld et al., 2018). At higher exposure levels, ATZ causes a number of effects that are similar across several animal species, e.g., developmental delays and abnormalities (Tavera-Mendoza et al., 2002; Nieves-Puigdoller et al., 2007), steroidogenesis and spermatogenesis abnormality, induction of oxidative stress and cytotoxicity and apoptosis (, 2012a; Victor-Costa et al., 2010; Pogrmic et al., 2009; Pogrmic-Majkic et al., 2010). Considering the relevance of genotoxic and oxidative damage in the harmful effects of several environmental and biological toxic chemicals such as agrochemicals, there has been no systematic study on the cytotoxicity, apoptosis and oxidative stress effects of ATZ in animal and cellular model systems. It is consequently imperative to point-out molecular variables of oxidative stress that detect effects of ATZ in both in vivo and in vitro experimental model systems. We present a review about ATZ effects, focusing on some target in vivo and cell-based in vitro systems in order to achieve a better grasp of its cellular mechanism of actions.
1.1 The Cytotoxicity of ATZ. data from In Vitro Study
The cytotoxic and DNA damaging effects of ATZ have been tested and confirmed in a variety of cell types; although most of the studies present inconsistent and conflicting results (Pino et al., 1988; Clements et al., 1997; Ribas et al., 1998; Taets et al., 1998). For instance, three cytotoxicity techniques: sister-chromatid exchanges, chromosome aberrations and micronuclei assays suggested that ATZ (5–100 μg/mL; 23.2–462 µM) lack the capacity to induce clastogenic and aneugenic damages in cultured human lymphocytes (Ribas et al., 1998). Other in vitro studies demonstrated that cultured human lymphocytes exposed to triazines (ATZ, simazine, and cyanazine) did not induce sister-chromatid exchanges or chromosome aberrations up to the limits of the doses of the chemicals that were severely toxic (Kligerman et al., 2000a). The chemical was also found not to be toxic to sheep peripheral blood phagocytes and lymphocytes even up to 100 mM, whereas in some studies, even at concentrations of ATZ as low as 0.0001 μg/mL (0.0005 µM), DNA damage were demonstrated in human lymphocytes cultures as measured by comet assay and chromosomal aberration analysis (Meisner et al., 1992). Similar results were also found when chromosome aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges and mitotic index, were applied in human peripheral lymphocytes exposed in vitro to ATZ at concentrations between 5 and 51 µM. Interestingly, the dose-related increase in the percent of aberrant cells and of sister chromatid exchanges were dependent on ATZ induced cytotoxicity as measured by Trypan blue exclusion assay (Lioi et al., 1998). At the highest concentration of ATZ exposed to the cultured human lymphocytes, glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity, either remained stable or decreased, when the cytotoxicity effect was increased (Lioi et al., 1998). This observation allowed the speculation that the increased sister-chromatid exchanges and chromosome aberrations after ATZ exposure, accompanied by a change in the cell redox state, confirms that reactive oxygen intermediates are involve in the cytotoxicity effect of ATZ in cultured lymphocytes. Thus, the thought that the genetic toxicity of ATZ and triazine chemicals could alter reactive oxygen intermediates in mammalian cells through a mechanism that involves glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase was demonstrated (Lioi et al., 1998). Hence, the initial response of the cells to ATZ would involve depleting of intracellular GSH pools, and subsequently, the inactivation of glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity/expression. It is therefore rationale to assume that when the exposure of cultured human lymphocytes to ATZ is sustained, the efficiency of the hexose monophosphate shunt to replenish the GSH pools is hampered with, together with it capacity to protect human lymphocytes against oxidant injury (Lioi et al., 1998). Furthermore, comet assay applied on erythrocytes isolated from the tadpoles, Rana catesbeiana exposed to ATZ showed DNA damage that appears to be dependent on ATZ dosages (Clements et al., 1997). Other studies have shown that these genotoxic effects are minimal, even if it exists. Roloff et al. (1992) reported little chromosome damage in human lymphocytes exposed to 0.005 µM (0.001 μg/mL) ATZ concentrations. ATZ did not also induce genotoxic damage by comet and DNA diffusion assay in human lymphocytes at concentrations between 0.047 and 4.7 μg/mL, whereas the commercial preparations of ATZ containing adjuvant mixtures could increase DNA damage in lymphocytes (Zeljezic et al., 2006), suggesting that the commercial formulations contain other substances that represent a genotoxic risk to human lymphocytes. Although the DNA damaging effects for non-cytotoxic doses of ATZ appear controversial (Meisner et al., 1992), higher concentrations would be more consistent with the genotoxicity of ATZ. However, sister chromatid exchanges analysis at metaphase cells are not appropriate techniques to use for this endpoint, since affected cells are delayed in G2-phase and do not proceed to mitosis (Malik et al., 2004). Furthermore, as the cytotoxicity studies for high concentrations of ATZ did not also demonstrate any increase in homologous recombinational events (Malik et al., 2004), a genotoxic mode of action of ATZ cannot be assumed in cultured human lymphocytes. Therefore, the variations in the sister chromatid exchanges analysis after exposures to certain concentrations of ATZ are due to polarities in cell cycle kinetics of cultured lymphocytes, rather than to a true biological disparity in the cytogenetic marker used (Malik et al., 2004). Hence, the general notion for most studies on the genotoxicity of ATZ in human cultured lymphocytes is to report negative results.
The cytoxicity of ATZ has also been demonstrated in gonadal experimental model systems. Clastogenicity was reported in the Chinese Hamster ovary (CHO) cells when flow cytometry was the cytotoxicity technique applied to determine the chromosomal damaging potentials of ATZ at the US EPA maximum contamination level of 3 ppb (0.0139 µM), and the highest contamination level of 18 ppb (0.0835 µM) found in a community drinking water supplies (Taets et al., 1998). Another study using the CHO cells found that ATZ at 20 μg/mL (20,000 ppb) caused a 19% growth decrease after 72 h and at 80 μg/mL (80,000 ppb), the cell viability was inhibited by 55% (Kmetic et al., 2008). The rates of porcine oocyte maturation and quality were reduced after exposure in vitro to 200 μM ATZ. When 5-bromo-deoxyuridine assay was applied to test the cell proliferative capacity, the population of proliferating cells was found to decrease. The cytotoxicity of ATZ effect also resulted in the disruption of the spindle morphology, maturation-promoting factor activity; mitochondrial membrane potential and DNA damage response as shown by TUNEL assay (Yuan et al., 2017). High levels of superoxide radicals, increase cathepsin B activity and the decrease in GSH concentration was assumed to be responsible for the impaired developmental competence of porcine oocyte (Yuan et al., 2017). The viability of testicular cells (Leydig and Sertoli-germ cells) that were treated with 232 μM (50 μg/mL) ATZ concentration and subjected to the 2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide salt (MTT) assay assays were found to be decreased (; ). The neutral red uptake (NRU) assay which allows viable cells to incorporate and bind the supravital dye neutral red in the lysosomes, also showed similar cytotoxicity pattern in Leydig cells but were less sensitive than the MTT assays (). This concentration of ATZ that was found to be cytotoxic in testicular cells was also required to decrease the viability of the rat pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells (). In this study on ATZ model of neuronal injury, the four cytotoxicity techniques: MTT, NRU, lactate dehydrogenase leakage and trypan blue assays confirmed the cytotoxic damage of ATZ in the PC12 cells. If the 24 h required for the manifestation of the cytotoxic response () is compared to the 48 h for the MTT assay and 72 h for the NRU assay; required for the onset of cell death in testicular cells (Leydig cells) (), it could suggest that neuronal cell lines could be more vulnerable to the cytotoxicity of ATZ than testicular cells. Additionally, ATZ concentration (300 μM, 65 μg/mL) slightly higher than those reported in the above studies (; ; ) was also observed to decrease the proliferation and cellular expansion of the human neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cells (). This was also detected in cell viability studies as demonstrated by the MTT and NRU assays and DNA ladder-like formation detected when ethidium bromide stained agarose gel electrophoresis was applied to check the mechanism of the cell death ().
The concentration-dependent cytotoxicity of ATZ has also been demonstrated across other mammalian cell types and fish cells. Tchounwou et al. (2001) found that ATZ concentration at 100 μg/mL (100, 000 ppb) is non-toxic to the human hepatoma cell line, HepG2. The chemical was also not toxic to rat primary hepatocytes (Sawicki et al., 1998). We had previously reported that ATZ at concentration of 300 μM (65 μg/mL); a concentration lower than that used in Tchounwou study was able to inhibit growth of human neuronal cell line (SH-SY5Y cell line) (). An ATZ concentration of 625 ppb or higher was needed to cause a decrease in HepG2 cell proliferation compared to control cells (Powell et al., 2011). Interestingly, concentrations of ATZ lower than 625 ppb were not sufficient to inhibit growth of immortalized HepG2 cells (Powell et al., 2011). However, in a previous study, ATZ at a concentration as small as 0.8 ppb was sufficient to decrease the growth of normal human fibroblast cells (Dhanwada et al., 2003). This value is 3.2 times less than the MCL of 3 ppb fixed by the EPA and is frequently detected in drinking water supplies (Gely-Pernot, 2017). Furthermore, the 625 ppb value is 3.5–10 times smaller than the concentration reported in studies where immortalized cells had been used (Sanderson et al., 2000; Laville et al., 2006; Rowe et al., 2007) and 160 times smaller than was reported in HepG2 cells (Tchounwou et al., 2001). The cytotoxic effects of ATZ was also reported by the MTT assay in cultured grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus cell line, ZC7901), with IC50 value ranging from 11.6 ± 6 0.5 mg/L to 199.0 ± 6 7.8 mg/L (Liu et al., 2006), indicating substantial flexibility in the cytotoxic responses of fish cells to ATZ exposure. Moreover, DNA fragmentation was detected by the TUNEL reaction and agarose gel electrophoresis in dose-and time-dependent fashion. The application of the MTT technique on this experimental model system, confirmed the cytotoxicity of low concentration of ATZ (9.4–47.2 mg/L) in fish cells.
The cytotoxicity of ATZ was also tested at doses ranging from 10–500 μM in human embryonic stem cells (hESC), a differentiation model system that is used to test the toxicity of chemicals at divergent phases of neural differentiation in vitro. In this study, hESC were differentiated into neural stem cells before they were terminally differentiated to neurons and glial cells after 21 days. The application of the cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) cell viability assay showed that ATZ could inhibit hESC viability and proliferation, and the numbers of colonies were dose-dependently decreased reaching almost 50% at 200 μM dose of ATZ after a long period of exposure (Shan et al., 2021).Other studies demonstrated that exposure to low-dose ATZ ranging from 0.0014–0.14 μM (0.3–30 ppb) for 4 days prior to differentiation and completion of differentiation, can result in long-lasting changes in epigenome and increase risks of synuclein alpha (SNCA)-related Parkinson’s disease in a pre-differentiation SH-SY5Y model system (Xie et al., 2021). The cytotoxicity observed in this study was minimal at the tested ATZ concentrations when tested by the MTT assay, suggesting that neuronal differentiation was affected without changes in the viability of cells (Xie et al., 2021). The effects of ATZ (12–300 μM) exposure on N27 rat dopaminergic cells, also confirmed that ATZ could alter the morphology of undifferentiated N27 cells, because after 48 h of exposure, differentiating N27 cells exhibited increased numbers of neurites and longer neurite length (Lin et al., 2013) similar to the altered neurite outgrowth reported at pre-differentiation exposure of SH-SY5Y to ATZ (Xie et al., 2021). It is interesting to also note that the sexual differentiation in amphibians also suffers dramatic changes at doses as low as 0.1 μg/L of ATZ (Hayes et al., 2002). It is therefore reasonable to assume that developmental exposure to low dose ATZ has the potential to cause long-lasting neurological variations (neural toxicity) and reproductive phenotypic changes in animal models. This is interesting to know, and has important environmental and public health concern, because the low dose 3 ppb and high dose 30 ppb ATZ concentrations employed in these studies are the present EPA regulation standard of ATZ in drinking waters, and the minimal dose of ATZ that can elicit gene expression changes without cytotoxicity effects, that are considered safe in drinking water or safe for limited human exposure, respectively (Rohr and McCoy, 2010; Xie et al., 2021).
Similarly, conflicting results on the cytotoxicity of ATZ in intestinal cells have been demonstrated. For instance, ATZ concentrations ranging from 1 to 10 μM (215.7–2157 ppb) increased the proliferation of human intestinal epithelial cells after 72 h, a mechanism associated with cancer development (Green and Reed, 1998).The application of trypan blue exclusion assay for cellular viability and the MTT assay for cell growth study on the normal rat IEC-6 intestinal and human colonic epithelial cell cultures produced a growth-stimulatory effect of ATZ, and the lowest dose (0.5–10 µM) was even more potent than higher doses (50 µM) in stimulating cell growth (Green and Reed, 1998). Because the growth and viability of normal rat intestinal cells and human colonic epithelial cell cultures treated with the DMSO vehicle were not influenced, lead to the suggestion that the growth rate increases in ATZ treated rat intestinal and colonic epithelial cell cultures are not due to the vehicle control (DMSO). However, the human colonic epithelial cell cultures are more sensitive to the effects of ATZ in sustaining cell growth than the rat intestinal cell cultures (Green and Reed, 1998). At concentration of 50 µM ATZ and above, ATZ was found to provoke substantial cytotoxic effects on the human intestinal Caco-2 cells. This brings about the decrease in cell proliferation rate and viability (Olejnik et al., 2010). Moreover, long-term exposure of the intestinal cells to ATZ at non-cytotoxic doses (1–10 μM) inhibited cell maturation and decline the transepithelial electrical resistance (Olejnik et al., 2010). The MTT test and the Trypan blue exclusion assay verified the cytotoxicity of ATZ, as both a dose- and time-dependent event in Caco-2 cells cultures (Olejnik et al., 2010). Thus, unlike the normal rat intestinal and human colonic cells, the human intestinal Caco-2 cells are more sensitive to the cytotoxic effect of ATZ (Olejnik et al., 2010). The reasons for these contrasting results are, apart the cancerous nature of Caco-2 cells, it is thought that ATZ causes loss of growth control in normal intestinal cells leading to its fast proliferation which allows the propagation of the mutated cells and ultimately leads to neoplasia (Olejnik et al., 2010). Furthermore, the growth of colonic epithelial cells may be responsive to the estrogenic activity of ATZ, such that the higher the number of estrogen receptors in normal cells, more than those of transformed cells, the higher the capacity of ATZ to stimulate normal intestinal cell proliferations (Olejnik et al., 2010). Additionally, DNA breaks and alkali labile lesions were found in gastric mucosa cells, when DNA alkaline elution technique was applied as the genotoxicity assay (Pino et al., 1988).
It is interesting to speculate that some aromatase sensitive cell types appear to exhibit consistency when they are tested for ATZ cytotoxicity. Laville et al. (2006) reported that ATZ at 10 μM (2157 ppb) did not alter the viability of the human choriocarcinoma JEG-3 cell line after 24 h as verified by the MTT assay; although this concentration could induce the activity of the aromatase enzyme, a very important molecular target of triazine herbicides, and increase or inhibit the viability of other cell types not expressing aromatase (Olejnik et al., 2010; Green and Reed, 1998). Several herbicides with endocrine disrupting effects like ATZ could also induce or inhibit aromatase activity at concentrations even lower than those unable to alter cell viability, suggesting that cytotoxicity and steroidogenic effects share dissimilar molecular events in aromatase responsive cell types (Laville et al., 2006). Another possibility on the unaltered viability of the JEG-3 cells would be that the high expression of aromatase in JEG-3 cells might be protective against cytotoxic responses by ATZ. This appears rationale to assume because human adrenocortical (H295R) and human breast cancer (MCF-7) cell lines which also express high level of aromatase (Sanderson et al., 2001) did not experience cytotoxicity at the same dose applied in the JEG-3 cells (Sanderson et al., 2000). In the work of Sanderson and colleagues, ATZ at concentrations of 0.3–30 μM (64.7–6,471 ppb) did not alter the growth of the H295R cells, even at the highest ATZ concentration tested, and despite the fact that these concentrations caused a dose-dependent increase in aromatase activity (Sanderson et al., 2000) and drastically inhibit the viability of other cell types (; Powell et al., 2011). These molecular features could be responsible for dampening ATZ cytotoxicity on these cell types.
ATZ cytotoxicity has also been reported in immune cells. For instance, natural-killer cell-specific activity of peripheral blood lymphocytes declined 24 h after ATZ exposure at concentrations of 3–30 μM (647.1–6,471 ppb), however, cell viability was unchanged even at the highest tested concentration of the herbicide (Rowe et al., 2007). CD4+ T cells were activated by 30 µM ATZ after 4 days of exposure (Thueson et al., 2015). The ATZ exposure decreased the antigen-driven build-up of CD4+ cells, an observation that is at variance with the unaltered numbers of CD4+ T cells that was reported earlier in the work of Filipov et al. (2005). This discrepancy was explained by the fact that in vivo ATZ exposure was not accompanied with lymphocyte activation. This is because in the absence of the triggering of T cell receptors (TCR), ATZ has only minimal effect on CD4+ T cell numbers (Shan et al., 2021). This is clinically relevant because the level of ATZ that produced these effects is lower than their urinary concentrations in high-risk people including farmers (Perry et al., 2001) and is similar or smaller than the levels reported in in vitro studies examining the immunotoxicity of ATZ (Devos et al., 2003; Pinchuk et al., 2007). Interestingly, 30 µM ATZ when applied in vitro to the CD4+ T cells was not cytotoxic since the frequency of apoptotic or necrotic cells was not raised. However, ATZ completely inhibited CD4+ T cell proliferation in a manner that was correlated with the inhibition of T cell activation, suggesting that people that are chronically exposed to ATZ occupationally or in their drinking water may have an altered immune status (Thueson et al., 2015). Recently, Galbiati et al. (2021) speculated that ATZ act on dopamine receptors expressed in immune cells during inflammatory responses for host defense, and alter inflammation-related diseases. Therefore, triazines immunotoxicology remains an important area to explore as it would influence our understanding of the connection between the immune and nervous systems in triazines disease model, e.g., inflammation-related diseases (Thompson et al., 2015). Dendritic cell viability studies with trypan blue exclusion assay showed that ATZ, at concentrations of up to 100 µM was not cytotoxic to bone marrow-derived immature dendritic cell lines (JAWSII DC) after 24 h. The application of annexin-V apoptosis assay to detect apoptosis found that at concentrations of ATZ up to 200 μM, the number of JAWSII cells undergoing apoptosis was increased, whereas at the highest concentration (300 µM), it increased modestly, the percentage of annexin-V positive cells. The phenotypic changes, including loss of surface major histocompatibility complex −1 (MHC-I) was observed at 1 µM concentration of ATZ. In these studies, the proportions of mature dendritic cells were decreased, suggesting that ATZ inhibited dendritic cell maturation even at doses that are regarded to as not cytotoxic (Pinchuk et al., 2007). Furthermore, ATZ-induced degranulation of mast cells was determined by measuring the release of granule-associated β-hexosaminidase from RBL-2H3 cells in which ATZ between the range of 10 nM and 1 μM showed induced rapid degranulation in mast cells. Interestingly, ATZ did not cause any cytotoxic effects on the cells, as evaluated by the trypan blue exclusion assay (Mizota and Ueda, 2006). It may appear that the doses of ATZ that interfered with major biological functions do not alter the viability of immune cells.
The cytotoxicity of ATZ has been tested with other triazines in four human breast cell lines: MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and MCF-10A. One common feature of these cells is their capacity to respond to endocrine toxicity (Rich and Gabriel, 2012). These breast cancer cells were found to be responsive to endocrine-disruptors, but the triazines (atrazine, cyanazine and simazine) failed to dramatically alter cell densities (Rich and Gabriel, 2012). Although there was a sign of plausible increase with ATZ at 10 nM and cyanazine at 10,000 nM in the MCF-7 cells, a tendency for raised cell viability was observed at 1,000 nM with simazine in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, and with no changes for the MCF-10A cells with any of the tested triazines. It appears that the existence of the estrogen receptors in these cells enhances the stimulatory effects of these chemicals and inflates cell growth, yet when these receptors are missing, the chemicals may be initiating cell death through apoptotic pathways (Rich and Gabriel, 2012). The viability of MDA-MB-231 cells, an estrogen independent breast cancer cell and the non-cancerous MCF-10A breast cells were not altered much after exposure to ATZ, even though it shows a trend to decrease except for simazine which dramatically increased the cell viability, suggesting that this triazine unlike ATZ responded diversely in the cells and/or that different tumors respond differently to triazine chemicals, a scenario that could influence the likely stimulatory and cytotoxicity actions of these chemicals (Rich and Gabriel, 2012). This variance in the responsiveness of different cells to ATZ toxicity are thought to be due to several points such as the choice of solvent (e.g., dimethyl sulfoxide or ethanol) used to dissolve the ATZ (Powell et al., 2011) and the ATZ estrogenic activity (Olejnik et al., 2010) as previously mentioned above. It is known that cultures of non-transformed cells are more estrogen-sensitive than the tumor cells (Potter, 1995). To affirm this speculation, Manske et al. (2004) reported that when DMSO was used as a solvent for ATZ, a 12.5-fold higher level of ATZ (10 ppb) was required to inhibit growth of normal human fibroblasts. Also, the proliferation of the estrogen-sensitive MCF7-BUS human breast cancer cells was not affected by ATZ concentration of up to 10 μM (Oh et al., 2003). It seems that ATZ can inhibit proliferation, viability and induces DNA damage in different cell types under in vitro settings, mostly at levels that do not frequently occur in the environment (Table 1). Furthermore, low-level of ATZ at concentrations that are environmentally material can lead to inhibition in the growth of normal cells raising the possibility that normal cells are more susceptible to the cytotoxicity of ATZ than immortalized cells. From all the data above, and within the context of ATZ model of cellular toxicity, cytotoxicity occurs at ATZ concentrations different from the doses that interferes with other important biologic functions, e.g., enzyme activity and/or expression, and that primary cells are more sensitive than cell lines to ATZ cytotoxic effect, which might also be affected by several factors including cell types (estrogen-responsive) and choice of the solvent used to dissolve the ATZ.
TABLE 1
| Concentrations (μM) | Cell Types | Effects on cell viability | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 × 10−3 | Human fibroblasts | Decreased | Dhanwada et al. (2003) |
| 10 | Caco-2 | No change | Green and Reed (1998) |
| 30 | H295R | No change | Sanderson et al. (2000) |
| 30 | Peripheral blood lymphocytes | No change | Rowe et al. (2007) |
| 2.9–23.2 | HepG2 | Decreased | Powell et al. (2011) |
| 50–1,000 | Rat hepatocytes | No change | Sawicki et al. (1998) |
| 200–300 | Mouse dendritic cells | Decreased | Pinchuk et al. (2007) |
| 232 | Rats testicular cells | Decreased | |
| 232 | PC12 | Decreased | |
| 250 | Caco-2 | Decreased | Olejnik et al. (2010) |
| 300 | SH-SY5Y | Decreased | |
| 93–371 | CHO-K1 | Decreased | Kmetic et al. (2008) |
| 463 | HepG2 | No change | Tchounwou et al. (2001) |
| 10–500 | hESC | Decreased | Shan et al. (2021) |
| 30 | CD4+ T | No change | Thueson et al. (2015) |
| 0.01–10 | Splenic lymphocytes | No change | Chen et al. (2015) |
Cytotoxicity effects of different concentrations of atrazine (μM) in different cell types.
1.2 Apoptosis-inducing effects of ATZ
Atrazine-induced apoptosis has been investigated in several experimental model systems (Table 2). A study developed by Liu et al. (2006) demonstrated that cells that are incubated with ATZ-presented a series of structural changes, including shrinking of the nucleus, flanking of chromatin to the shape of thick granular caps, and generation of apoptotic bodies. Moreover, TUNEL assay and agarose gel electrophoresis were used to detect the fragmented DNA. This was the first proof that ATZ could cause apoptosis in vitro. Exposure to agrochemicals, e.g., ATZ is assume to be one of the stressful cellular situations that could trigger some molecular events, e.g., expression of p53 protein. This protein gauges DNA damage and function as a transcription factor controlling genes, which regulate cell growth, apoptosis and DNA repair (Cozmei et al., 2002). p53 expression was found to be increased in peripheral lymphocytes of rats chronically treated with ATZ (). The peripheral mononuclear cells of humans occupationally exposed to ATZ also showed increased expression of p53 (Cozmei et al., 2002). Tian et al. (2018) observed that the proliferation of H22 cells after been treated with 0.01 and 0.1 µM ATZ increased in the absence of changes in the percentage of apoptotic cells. Additionally, the tumor size and mass of ascites were remarkably expanded in an orthotopically implanted hepatocarcinoma tumor C57BL/6 mice model. p53 expression was downregulated, whereas those of cyclin-D1, MMP2, Stat3, VEGF and C-myc was upregulated by ATZ, suggesting that ATZ activated Stat3 signaling and induced the proliferation and seizure of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. The H22 cells that were exposed to ATZ at 0.01 μM displayed an increase in proliferation much more than those exposed to 0.1 μM ATZ when tested by the MTT proliferation assay. The increase in H22 cells proliferation was also accompanied with a decline in the number of cells in the G2 phase and a rise in the populations of cells in the S phase, suggesting that ATZ induces the accumulation of cells in the S phase and moves the H22 cells quickly through the G2 phase (Tian et al. (2018). The numbers of apoptotic cells in human lymphocytes have also been reported to escalate when treated with commercial preparations containing ATZ (Zeljezic et al., 2006). The apoptotic nuclei of lymphocytes going through apoptosis or necrosis were distinct from normal cells in having a foggy or vague outline without exact margins because of the nucleosomal-sized DNA dispersing into the agarose. Necrotic cell nuclei are larger and are poorly delineated. They have a distinct, defined outward margin of the DNA halo and a proportionate homogenous halo appearance. Conversely, cells that are not necrotic or apoptotic but have damaged DNA have well-defined nuclei with a broad halo and defined external boundary.
TABLE 2
| Concentrations (μM) | Cell types | Expressions of genes | Genes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 300 | SH-SY5Y | Decreased | p53 | |
| Decreased | p21 | |||
| Decreased | Bax | |||
| Decreased | Bcl-2 | |||
| 232 | PC12 | Increased | p53 | |
| Increased | Bax | |||
| Increased | Caspase-3 | |||
| Increased | Caspase-9 | |||
| Decreased | Bcl-2 | |||
| 0.23–2.32 | HepG2 | Decreased | Cyclin B | Powell et al. (2011) |
| Decreased | Cyclin E | |||
| 0.01 and 0.1 | H22 | Decreased | p53 | Tian et al. (2018) |
| Increased | Cyclin-D1 | |||
| Increased | VEGF | |||
| Increased | C-myc | |||
| 10 | Increased | Caspase-3 | Ge et al. (2021) | |
| Lymphocytes | Increased | Caspase-9 | ||
| Decreased | Bcl-2 | |||
| 1–30 | Human placenta | Decreased | p53 | Ibrahim et al. (2015) |
| Increased | Bcl-2 |
Expressions of apoptosis-related genes in differerent cell types exposed atrazine.
Shan et al. (2021) treated hESC and neural stem cells to ATZ for up to 24 h and observed that ATZ caused dissimilar toxic susceptibility on these cells. For instance, ATZ stopped the G1 phase of neural stem cells by down-regulating the cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 2 (CDK4 and CDK2), which occluded more cells to traverse the G1/S phase nodes and inhibited the mitosis of neural stem cells. Thus, considering the neurotoxicity of ATZ, it is believed that ATZ not only target the dopaminergic system but also the glutamatergic neurons and astrocytes (Filipov et al., 2007; Shan et al., 2021). In addition, MKI67 (marker of proliferation Ki-67) and PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) gene expressions along with CCND1 which moves cells from G1 into S phase were decreased, but the percentages of early apoptosis and late apoptotic cells showed no obvious changes at the tested doses (100–500 μM) of ATZ treatment (Shan et al. (2021). The recent findings by Galbiati and colleagues on the connection between the immune and nervous systems in endocrine disruption of ATZ, confirms the relevance of the dopaminergic system in the neurotoxicity of triazines (Galbiati et al., 2021). Manske et al. (2004) did not detect any increase in apoptosis in human fibroblast exposed to low doses of industrial grade ATZ. However, in the study of Greenlee et al. (2004) herbicide preparations containing ATZ suitable for commercial purposes increased the rate of apoptosis in exposed murine embryos.
There are numerous possible course of toxicity that would lead to the suppression of cell growth. One conceivable rationale for the decrease in the cell number could be that ATZ exposure cause DNA damage in cells and ultimately apoptosis. In the research of Olejnik and Colleagues, the detection of the DNA damage was conducted utilizing the alkaline single cell micro electrophoresis assay, a helpful and responsive technique for assessing DNA damage (Ventura et al., 2008). Their results showed that intestinal Caco-2 cells responsiveness to ATZ-induced DNA damage was not remarkably contingent on the growth stage and that Caco-2 cells were not sensitive to the genotoxic effect of ATZ at concentrations of up to 50 μM (Figure 1). To understand the reasons for the diminished cell numbers after exposure of cells to ATZ, propidium iodide staining of DNA accompanied with flow cytometry analysis was used to determine if the ATZ treated cells were adjusted in their successions along the cell cycle (Powell et al., 2011). After exposure to ATZ for 48 h, an aggregation of the S phase cells was observed in the 100, 300 and 500 ppb treated samples (Figure 2) and a decrease in the G1 and the G2/M phases cells in the 300 ppb treated cells for 24 h (Powell et al., 2011). This is the same as the report of Freeman and Rayburn (2006) where CHO cells exposed to ATZ at 200 μM (43,000 ppb) produced a notable aggregation of S phase nuclei. In the study of Powell and colleagues a much smaller concentration of ATZ (100 ppb) was indispensable to initiate an effect. The capacity of ATZ to cause DNA fragmentation and apoptosis in fish cell lines was found to include interference on the mitochondrial membrane potential and production of ROS (Liu et al., 2006). Likewise, the clastogenicity of ATZ in the peripheral lymphocytes of rats was accompanied with escalated expressions of p53 proteins (). Experiments developed by our research group also reported that high concentrations of ATZ (300 μM) initiated nuclear changes linked with apoptosis; including fragmentation of nuclei, condensation, DNA laddering (Figure 3), and amplified caspase-3 activity in the human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. This was associated with alterations in the expressions of caspase-3, caspase-9, p21, p53, Bax and Bcl-2, p21, and and decreased proliferation and growth of cells (). The diminished expressions of c-fos and c-Jun in PC12 cells as observed earlier by us was as a consequence of the observed apoptotic cell death as demonstrated by the MTT assay (). The alterations in the expressions of apoptosis-related genes implicate the role of apoptosis in the observed cell death. Flow cytometric examination established the implication of ROS in the ATZ-induced apoptosis in vitro. We conclude here that the increased ROS levels and alterations in the gene expressions of apoptosis-related genes and proteins in experimental models exposed to ATZ indicates the potential of ATZ to induce apoptosis in mammalian models especially at high concentrations.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
1.3 The cytotoxicity of ATZ. data from In Vivo study
The DNA-damaging potentials of ATZ in polychromatic erythrocytes of mice were not evident as measured by the bone marrow micronuclei assay, even at large dose exposures that result in bone marrow suppression and/or death (Kligerman et al., 2000b). Other studies reported that, even extremely high concentrations of the triazines, including ATZ, have only marginal DNA-damaging activity in vivo in mouse leukocytes, when the isolated leukocytes were subjected to DNA damage analysis using the alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay, one of the most responsive DNA damage protocols available (Tennant et al., 2001). DNA breaks and alkali labile lesions were found in stomach mucosa and kidney, and to a lower degree in the liver, but not in the lungs of rats that were orally administered a single high dose (875Â mg/kg b.w) or repeated daily doses (350Â mg/kg b.w) of ATZ (Pino et al., 1988) for 5 and 15Â days. Interestingly, the DNA damage in the stomach mucosa environment as detected by the DNA alkaline elution technique correlated with the activation of ATZ in the gastic cells (Rajkovic et al., 2011). This observation, couple with the insolubility of ATZ in water and the prolonged contact of ATZ with the stomach mucosa environment, was the reason for the long-lasting DNA-damaging activity of ATZ in gastric cells (
Atrazine was found to increase CAT levels and maintained the expressions of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and GST in the liver of rats. In addition, lipid peroxidation, degeneration of hepatic tissues, activation of heat shock protein-90, escalated expression of connexin mRNA, and genotoxic damage were reported in the liver of the animals. It was concluded that ATZ prompted hepatic oxidative stress that provoked defense mechanisms of the liver, an adaptive strategy essential for maintaining the morpho-physiological integrity of hepatic tissues (
There are still no studies on cell cycle proteins to define the mechanisms of apoptosis and necrosis in frog’s erythrocytes. Rana catesbeiana tadpoles (bull frog) exposed to concentrations of AAtrex Nine-O (ATZ as active ingredient) showed significant increases in DNA damage when compared to the control. The percentage of damaged cells was also increased with increasing dose of the herbicide (Figure 4), but the association between DNA damage and the herbicide dose was modest (r = 0.663). Furthermore, no tadpoles lived after 24 h of exposure to 308 mg/L of the herbicide (Table 3), a concentration that is calculated to approximate one-tenth of the oral LD50 (3,080 mg/kg) of AAtrex for mice (Clements et al., 1997). It may be assumed that low concentrations of ATZ threaten the survival of organisms that inhabits small bodies of water draining pesticide runoff. The ability of ATZ to also induce genotoxicity in vivo concerning the increase in the prevalence of micronuclei and DNA strand breaks was also demonstrated in the erythrocytes of Carassius auratus (
FIGURE 4

Distribution of DNA damage (based on length-width ratios of DNA patterns) observed at the cellular level in R. catesbeiana tadpoles (bullfrog) after exposure for a 24-h period to dechlorinated water. Methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and selected concentrations of the herbicide AAtrex Nine-O; Source: Clements et al., 1997.
TABLE 3
| Dose (mg/L) | No. of tadpoles | DNA length: width ratio ± SEMa | Range: SD ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Negative control | 11 | 1.343 ± 0.022 | 2.99 |
| 4.813 | 7 | 1.821 ± 0.095 | 2.38 |
| 19.25 | 6 | 1.861 ± 0.138 | 2.52 |
| 77 | 7 | 2.131 ± 0.087 | 2.71 |
| 308c | 4 | ||
| Positive control (3.125 mg/L MMS) | 9 | 2.265 ± 0.044 | 3.45 |
Detection of DNA damage in erythrocytes of R. catesbeiana tadpoles exposed to AAtrex Nine-O for 24Â h (Source: Clements et al., 1997).
*The recommended application concentrations ranged from 2.5 to 29.3Â g/L.
Ratios based on 25 cells/tadpole.
All comparisons are relative to the negative control.
All animals died within 24Â h.
MMS, methyl methanesulphonate.
To further support the role of apoptosis in ATZ toxicity, low numbers of 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase positive Leydig cells accompanied with amplified in situ cell death fluorescence (Figure 5) and caspase-3 immunoexpression in the testes of mice orally exposed to ATZ (50 mg/kg b.w) for 3 days was demonstrated by us (
FIGURE 5

3β-HSD immunostaining in the testes of control and treated BalB/c mice 3 consecutive days after treatment with 50 mg ATZ per kg body wt. The immuno-expression of 3β-HSD was intense in the Leydig cells (LCs) of the control (A) and was decreased in the testis of atrazine treated mice (B), Note that 3β-HSD is expressed in almost all LCs in controls, but is only expressed in some LCs in atrazine treated mice, whereas other LCs are less immunopositive for 3β-HSD (arrowhead). Scale bar = 50 μm, Mag 400×). Source:
Another study performed in zebrafish also observed alterations in the expressions of proteins associated with oxidative stress, oncogenesis, lipid metabolism and insulin resistance after ATZ exposures (Yuanxiang et al., 2012). Lipid droplets were found to be accumulated in the liver of rats after 5Â months of exposure to ATZ and this was associated with altered mitochondrial morphology in the liver, and additionally in muscle. Since no treatment-associated changes in food or water intake or physical activity were reported throughout the study, it was suggested that the occurrence of insulin resistance as a consequence of ATZ exposure might be related to energy metabolism, and authors suggested that prolonged exposure to ATZ might contribute to the development of insulin resistance and obesity, especially where a high fat diet is fashionable (Lim et al., 2009). Evidence of oxidative stress was also reported in the liver of a fresh water fish Channa Punctatus (Bloch), when the animals were exposed to ATZ at concentrations ranging from 4.24 to 10.6Â mg/L in a semi static system for 15Â days (Nwani et al., 2010). After completion of ATZ exposure, the antioxidant enzymes: superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione reductase responded positively to the enhanced lipid peroxidation status of the fish liver in a concentration-dependent fashion (Nwani et al., 2010). From these data, it can be suggested that the liver is one of the important target organ of ATZ toxicity, but the hepatotoxicity in mammalian models appears to be observed only at concentrations of ATZ not likely encountered in the environment, which may not be true for aquatic animals. However, more studies with environmentally applicable doses of ATZ will furnish additional information on the roles of apoptosis and oxidative stress in the hepatotoxicity of ATZ in human, wildlife and mammalian models.
2 Testicular toxicity of atrazine in experimental models
The adverse effect of ATZ on testicular functions has been investigated by few researchers (Table 4). A study developed by Swan et al. (2003) was the first to explore the human reproductive risks that are connected to ATZ exposure. This population-based study demonstrated the link between specific biomarkers of environmental exposures and male reproduction in humans and concluded that the association between pesticides use and diminished semen quality suggested that agrochemicals such as ATZ may have played a part in the lowering of semen quality in fertile men.
TABLE 4
| Parameter | Cell types/tissue | Concentrations/doses | Expressions | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3β-HSD | Testis | >50 mg/kg | Decreased | Victor-Costa et al. (2010) |
| 3β-HSD | Leydig cells | 5–50 μg/mL | Increased | |
| AR | Sertoli-germ cells | 50 μg/mL | Increased | |
| ER-alpha | Sertoli-germ cells | 50 μg/mL | No change | |
| ER-alpha | Leydig cells | 10 μg/mL | Increased | |
| SCF | Sertoli-germ cells | 50 μg/mL | Decreased | |
| CYP11A1 | Leydig cells | 5–10 μg/mL | Increased | |
| StAR | Leydig cells | 5–10 μg/mL | Increased | |
| LHR | Testis | 50–200 mg/kg | Decreased | Pogrmic et al. (2009) |
| 17β-HSD | Testis | 50–200 mg/kg | Decreased | Pogrmic et al. (2009) |
| StAR | Testis | 50–200 mg/kg | Decreased | Pogrmic et al. (2009) |
| CYP17A1 | Testis | 50–200 mg/kg | Decreased | Pogrmic et al. (2009) |
| SR-B1 | Testis | 50–200 mg/kg | Decreased | Pogrmic et al. (2009) |
| 17β-HSD | Leydig cells | 20 μM | Increased | Pogrmic et al. (2009) |
| CYP-17A1 | Leydig cells | 20 μM | Increased | Pogrmic et al. (2009) |
| SF-1 | Leydig cells | 20 μM | Increased | Pogrmic et al. (2009) |
| StAR | Leydig cells | 20 μM | Increased | Pogrmic et al. (2009) |
| 3β-HSD | Testis | 50 mg/kg | Decreased | |
| ARO | Testis | 50Â mg/kg | Decreased | |
| AR | Testis | 50Â mg/kg | Increased | |
| ER-α | Testis | 50 mg/kg | Increased | |
| p450scc | Testis | 100–200 mg/kg | Decreased | Jin et al. (2013) |
| p450 17α1 | Testis | 100–200 mg/kg | Decreased | Jin et al. (2013) |
| 17β-HSD | Testis | 100–200 mg/kg | Decreased | Jin et al. (2013) |
| SR-B1 | Testis | 200Â mg/kg b.w | Decreased | Jin et al. (2014) |
Expressions of markers of steroidogenesis in the testis and testicular cells of rats and mice after atrazine exposure as reported in literature.
3 β-HSD, 3β-Hydroxysteroid steroid dehydrogenase; AR, androgen receptor; ER-alpha = estrogen receptor-alpha; SCF, stem cell factor; CYP11A1 = cytochrome P450 cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme (P450scc); StAR, steroidogenic acute regulatory protein; CYP17A1 = cytochrome P450 17α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (P450 17α); SF-1, steroidogenic factor-1; ARO, aromatase; scavenger receptor class B type 1 (SR-B1); 17β-HSD, 17β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases.
In animal studies, it was shown that histopathological features in the testis and epididymis of ATZ treated mice revealed cells that were disorganized and clusters of cells aggregated with spermatocytes (
FIGURE 6

Atrazine decreases sperm production in Salmon. Sources: Moore and Waring, 1998; Cox, 2001.
FIGURE 7

Atrazine decreases sperm quality of rats after 7 days of exposure. Adapted from
The relevance of the mRNA expressions of steroidogenesis genes: steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (STAR), cytochrome P450 (CYP) 11A1, 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3β-HSD), estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-α) and androgen receptor (AR) in interstitial Leydig cells (ILCs) as a gauge of ATZ induced testicular toxicity in rats ILCs after short-term exposure was reported by us (
To understand the importance of the antioxidant protective network in the testis and epididymis of mammalian animal models, we found that the antioxidant defense set-up in the gonads, e.g., testis and epididymis was decreased, a scenario that is synonymous to the manifestation of oxidative stress (
The capacity of ATZ to alter electron transport and oxidative stress in the mitochondria of Drosophila melanogaster has also been reported (Thornton et al., 2010). In a panel of research designed to determine the possible effects of ATZ on male amphibians in vivo, gonadal aromatase activity in ATZ-treated animals was found to be comparable to those of the control animals (Coady et al., 2004; Hecker et al., 2004). The explanation for the contrary results was attributed to one of two factors: 1) ATZ does not affect aromatase activity in the examined amphibian species, or 2) that because of the inadequate enzyme activities in the gonads, it was not technically workable to analyse precise variations in aromatase with the applied test model. In another study with Xenopus laevis, aromatase enzyme activity and gene expression were comparable to the control, and the tested ATZ concentration was found not to interfere with steroidogenesis because of the unaffected aromatase action (Hecker et al., 2005). Thus, there remain discrepancies on the hormonal effects of ATZ in experimental models, and only at high concentration was ATZ found to alter plasma testosterone homeostasis. Future studies with environmentally relevant doses of ATZ targeting more on a general mode of toxic action as pertaining to their effects on spermatogenesis and steroidogenesis are therefore necessary.
3 Chemopreventive intervention with selected antioxidants
Several pharmacological agents including melatonin, vitamins, quercetin, kolaviron, selenium, tannic acid have been used to reduce ATZ-induced toxicity regarding oxidative damage and apoptosis. These molecules substantially decreased the in vivo and in vitro toxic actions of ATZ, presumably, because of their antioxidative properties. Melatonin, a principal secretory product from the pineal gland, has been demonstrated to have an effective antioxidant and free radical scavenger properties (
Kolaviron, a bioactive bioflavonoid extracted from bitter kola was also found to protect cultured ILCs from ATZ-induced toxicity. Our study with ILCs demonstrated that kolaviron improved the LCs viability and diminished MDA and ROS concentrations. Additional investigations showed a decrease in glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), glutathione reductase (GR), GST and escalation of superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD-1) and superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD-2) as measured by mRNA expression. Furthermore, the changes in the mRNA transcript copy numbers of steroidogenesis genes: StAR, CYP11A1, and 3β-HSD prompted by ATZ treatment were reversed to control values, confirming that kolaviron protected ILCs against the toxicity of ATZ. This was speculated to be throughthe suppression of ROS and MDA levels and accompanied by the normalization of mRNA expression of the tested antioxidant and steroidogenesis genes (
In a recent study, we confirmed in vivo that quercetin at lower doses could improve the histological features of the rat´s testes after treated with ATZ. The tubules with single layers of germ cells including the stem cell spermatogonia next to the basement membrane and enlarged interstitial space after ATZ exposure were seen to have been re-populated with germ cells at different maturity stages in the epithelium over a time course of 60 days after treatment with both curcumin and quercetin (Ndufeiya-Kumasi et al., 2022). Although, curcumin was better than quercetin in protecting the testis from ATZ gonadal toxicity, their combined -treatment improved quercetin protective effects against ATZ-induced testicular injury. It seems plausible because curcumin has a preferable ability compare to quercetin to pass through the blood-testes barrier and on co-administration could promote the passing of quercetin through tissue barriers so as to enhance their protective effect against ATZ-induced injury to the gonads (Sharma et al., 2018;
4 Molecular insights on the role of apoptosis and oxidative stress in the cytotoxicity of ATZ
The probable mechanisms contributing to ATZ–induced cytotoxicity, apoptosis and oxidative stress have been summarized in Figure 8. The binding of ATZ to target cells mitochondrial redox systems may cause mitochondrial dysfunction (Galbiati et al., 2021) and activate ROS- induced oxidative stress systems, followed by cytotoxicity, DNA damage and apoptosis. The initial response to ATZ exposure would involve the inactivation of glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase activity/expression, and subsequently, the depletion of intracellular GSH pools (Lioi et al., 1998). If the exposure to ATZ is sustained, the resulting redox-imbalance activates p53 expressions directly, leading to cytotoxic responses in lymphocytes (Lioi et al., 1998), or through a ROS-responsive TNF-α/TNFR 1 pathway, and together with increased cathepsin activity could explain the increased caspase-3 mediated apoptosis (Gao et al., 2022). The cytotoxic response that accompanied decreased c-Fos and c-Jun expressions may result in increased apoptosis (
FIGURE 8

Probable graphical representations of the molecular mechanisms of ATZ-induced redox imbalance, cytotoxicity and apoptosis, as well as possible sites of actions of chemopreventives. The probable interventional target sites for the chemopreventives are illustrated as shaded circles (
).
5 Conclusion
Although ATZ may induce cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, apoptosis and genotoxicity in in vivo and in vitro experimental models, the majority of the doses of ATZ required to induce these changes in most of the studies reported in literature are unlikely to be found in the environment, thus the environmental levels of ATZ may not exceed a level of concern for humans and wildlife. However, the contributions of oxidative stress and apoptosis in the cytotoxicity of ATZ have been demonstrated in many experimental model systems. But, it is pertinent to consider that, as humans and wildlife may be continuously exposed to minuscule concentrations of ATZ, more studies with environmentally relevant doses of ATZ will come up with further ideas and assumptions on the mechanism of testicular-, neuronal- and hepato-toxicity caused by ATZ. Furthermore, the actions of ATZ on redox status of cells/animals are important interventional target sites at the mechanistic level, since the induced oxidative stress, cytotoxicity, apoptosis and genotoxicity observed in ATZ-exposed experimental models were blunted by antioxidants: such as vitamins (vitamin E and C and antioxidant bioactive flavonoids such as quercetin, myricetin, curcumin and kolaviron. Finally, 3β-HSD inhibition represents a plausible alternative mechanism by which ATZ affects gonadal androgen secretion and production resulting to changes in spermatogenesis in adult mammalian animal models, which might be different from the aromatase hypothesis that have been established for lower animals.
Statements
Author contributions
SA and EF designed the study and wrote the manuscript; OE and CI contributed in the prepration of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AbarikwuS. O.AdesiyanA. C.OyelojaT. O.OyeyemiM. O.FarombiE. O. (2010). Changes in sperm characteristics and induction of oxidative stress in the testis and epididymis of experimental rats by a herbicide, atrazine. Archives Environ. Contam. Toxicol.58, 874–882. 10.1007/s00244-009-9371-2
2
AbarikwuS. O.CostaG. M. J.de LimaE.Martins LaraN.LacerdaS. M. S. N.de FrançaL. R. (2021). Atrazine impairs testicular function in BalB/c mice by affecting Leydig cells. Toxicology455, 152761. 10.1016/j.tox.2021.152761
3
AbarikwuS. O.FarombiE. O.KashyapM.PantA. B. (2011a). Atrazine induces transcriptional changes in marker genes associated with steroidogenesis in primary cultures of rat Leydig cells. Toxicol. Vitro25, 1588–1595. 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.06.002
4
AbarikwuS. O.FarombiE. O.KashyapM. P.PantA. B. (2011b). Kolaviron protects apoptotic cell death in PC12 cells exposed to Atrazine. Free Radic. Res.45, 1061–1073. 10.3109/10715762.2011.593177
5
AbarikwuS. O.FarombiE. O.PantA. B. (2011c). Biflavanone-kolaviron protects human dopaminergic SH-SY5Y cells against atrazine induced toxic insult. Toxicol. Vitro25, 848–858. 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.02.005
6
AbarikwuS. O.FarombiE. O.PantA. B. (2012). Kolaviron biflavanoids of Garcinia kola seeds protect atrazine-induced cytotoxicity in primary cultures of rat Leydig cells. Int. J. Toxicol.31 (4), 407–415. 10.1177/1091581812445476
7
AbarikwuS. O.OleribeA. L.Mgbudom-OkahC. J.OnuahC. L.ChikwenduC. S.OnyeikeE. N. (2022). The protective effect of fluted pumpkin seeds against atrazine-induced testicular injury. Drug Chem. Toxicol.45 (2): 799–809.
8
AbarikwuS. O.PantA. B.FarombiE. O. (2012a). The protective effects of quercetin on atrazine-induced cytotoxicity on rat Sertoli-germ cell co-culture. Int. J. Androl.35: 590–600.
9
AbdelhamidF. M.MahgoubH. A.AteyaA. I. (2020). Ameliorative effect of curcumin against lead acetate–induced hemato-biochemical alterations, hepatotoxicity, and testicular oxidative damage in rats. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.27, 10950–10965. 10.1007/s11356-020-07718-3
10
AckermanF. (2007). The economics of atrazine. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health13, 437–445. 10.1179/oeh.2007.13.4.437
11
AdesinaJ.OlabodeO. S.SangodeleA. O. (2014). Performance evaluation of brands of atrazine in South West Nigeria. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.3, 85–92.
12
AdesiyanA. C.OyejolaT. O.AbarikwuS. O.OyeyemiM. O.FarombiE. O. (2011). Selenium provides protection to the liver but not the reproductive organs in an atrazine-model of experimental toxicity. Exp. Toxicol. Pathology63, 201–207. 10.1016/j.etp.2009.11.008
13
AdlerI. D. (1980). A review of the coordinated research effort on the comparison of test systems for the detection of mutagenic effects, sponsored by the E.E.C.Mutat. Res.74 (2), 77–93. 10.1016/0165-1161(80)90234-4
14
AlavanjaM. C. R.SamanicC.DosemeciM.LubinJ.TaroneR.LynchC. F.et al (2003). Use of agricultural pesticides and prostate cancer risk in the Agricultural Health Study cohort. Am. J. Epidemiol.157, 800–814. 10.1093/aje/kwg040
15
BhattiJ. S.Sidhu Ips BhattiG. K. (2011). Ameliorative action of melatonin on oxidative damage induced by atrazine toxicity in rat erythrocytes. Mol. Cell. Biochem.353, 139–149. 10.1007/s11010-011-0780-y
16
BissonM.HontelaA. (2002). Cytotoxic and endocrine-disrupting potential of atrazine, diazinon, endosulfan, and mancozeb in adrenocortical steroidogenic cells of rainbow trout exposed in vitro. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.180, 110–117. 10.1006/taap.2002.9377
17
BrodkinM. A.MadhounH.RameswarenM.VatnickI. (2007). Atrazine is an immune disruptor in adult northern leopard frogs (Rana pipiens). Environ. Toxicol. Chem.26, 80–84. 10.1897/05-469.1
18
BrownL. M.BurmeisterL. F.EverettG. D.BlairA. (1993). Pesticide exposures and multiple myeloma in Iowa men. Cancer Causes Control4, 153–156. 10.1007/BF00053156
19
BuyukokurogluM. E.CemekM.YurumezY.YavuzY.AslanA. (2008). Antioxidative role of melatonin in organophosphate toxicity in rats. Cell. Biol. Toxicol.24, 151–158. 10.1007/s10565-007-9024-z
20
Campos-PereiraF. D.OliveiraC. A.PigosoA. A.Silva-ZacarinE. C. M.BarbieriR.SpattiE. F.et al (2012). Early cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of atrazine on wistar rat liver: a morphological, immunohistochemical, biochemical, and molecular study. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.78, 170–177. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.11.020
21
CantemirC.CozmeiC.ScutaruB.NicoaraS.CaraseviciE. (1997). p53 Protein expression in peripheral lymphocytes from atrazine chronically intoxicated rats. Toxicol. Lett.93, 87–94. 10.1016/s0378-4274(97)00050-7
22
CavasT. (2011). In vivo genotoxicity evaluation of atrazine and atrazine-based herbicide on fish Carassius auratus using the micronucleus test and the comet assay. Food Chem.49, 1431–1435. 10.1016/j.fct.2011.03.038
23
ChangJ.FangW.ChenL.ZhangP.ZhangG.ZhangH.et al (2022). Toxicological effects, environmental behaviors and remediation technologies of herbicide atrazine in soil and sediment: a comprehensive review. Chemosphere307 (3), 136006. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136006
24
ChenJ.HuoJ.JiaZ.SongY.LiY.ZhangL. (2015). Effects of atrazine on the proliferation and cytotoxicity of murine lymphocytes with the use of carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester-based flow cytometric approaches. Food Chem. Toxicol.76, 61–69. 10.1016/j.fct.2014.11.026
25
ClementsC.RalphS.PetrasM. (1997). Genotoxicity of select herbicides in Rana catesbeiana tadpoles using the alkaline single-cell gel DNA electrophoresis (Comet) assay. Environ. Mol. Mutagen.29, 277–288. 10.1002/(sici)1098-2280(1997)29:3<277:aid-em8>3.0.co;2-9
26
CoadyK. K.MurphyM. B.VilleneuveD. L.HeckerM.JonesP. D.CarrJ. A.et al (2004). Effects of atrazine on metamorphosis, growth, and gonadal development in the green frog (Rana clamitans). J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A67, 941–957. 10.1080/15287390490443722
27
CookL. E.FingerB. J.GreenM. P.PaskA. J. (2018). Exposure to atrazine during puberty reduces sperm viability, increases weight gain and alters the expression of key metabolic genes in the liver of male mice. Reproduction, Fertil. Dev.31 (5), 920–931. 10.1071/RD18505
28
Costa SilvaR. G. C.VignaC. R. M.BottoliC. B. G.CollinsC. H.AugustoF. (2010). Molecularly imprinted silica as a selective SPE sorbent for triazine herbicides. J. Sep. Sci.33, 1319–1324. 10.1002/jssc.200900785
29
CoxC. (2001). Atrazine: environmental contamination and ecological effects. J. Pestic. Reform21, 12–20.
30
CozmeiC.ScutaruB.ConstantinescuD.PopaD.CaraseviciE. (2002). p53 immunocytochemical detection and occupational exposure to atrazine. J. Prev. Med.10, 37–44.
31
CuricS.GojmeracT.ZuricM. (1999). Morphological changes in the organs of gilts induced with low-dose atrazine. Veterinary Arch.69, 135–148.
32
DestroA. L. F.SilvaS. B.GregorioK. P.de OliveiraJ. M.LoziA. A.ZuanonJ. A. S.et al (2021). Effects of subchronic exposure to environmentally relevant concentrations of the herbicide atrazine in the Neotropical fish, Astyanax altiparanae. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.208, 111601. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111601
33
DevosS.De BosscherK.StaelsB.BauerE.RoelsF.BergheW.et al (2003). Inhibition of cytokine production by the herbicide atrazine. Search for nuclear receptor targets. Biochem. Pharmacol.65, 303–308. 10.1016/s0006-2952(02)01507-1
34
DhanwadaK. R.DengY.ClaytonM. E. (2003). Effects of the pesticides atrazine, metoachlor and diazinon and binary mixtures on proliferation of human fibroblasts. Int. J. Glob. Health2 (2), 21–36.
35
MiensahE. D.FiankoJ. R.Adu-KumiS. (2015) Assessment of lindane and atrazine residues in maize produced in Ghana using gas chromatography-electron capture detector (GC-ECD) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). J. Environ. Prot.6:203–212. 10.1007/bf00215799
36
TasliS.PattyL.BoettiH. (1996). Persistence and leaching of atrazine in corn culture in the experimental site of La Côte Saint André (Isère, France). Archives Environ. Contam. Toxicol.30(2): 203–212.
37
FanW. Q.YanaseT.MorinagaH.GondoS.OkabeT.NomuraM.et al (2008). Atrazine-induced aromatase expression is SF-1 dependent: implications for endocrine disruption in wildlife and reproductive cancers in humans. Environ. Health Perspect.115, 720–727. 10.1289/ehp.9758
38
FilipovN. M.PinchukL. M.BoydB. L.CrittendenP. L. (2005). Immunotoxic effects of short-term atrazine exposure in young male C57BL/6 mice. Toxicol. Sci.86 (2), 324–332. 10.1093/toxsci/kfi188
39
FilipovN. M.StewartM. A.CarrR. L.SistrunkS. C. (2007). Dopaminergic toxicity of the herbicide atrazine in rat striatal slices. Toxicology232 (1-2), 68–78. 10.1016/j.tox.2006.12.007
40
FreemanJ. L.RayburnA. L. (2006). Aquatic herbicides and herbicide contaminants: in vitro cytotoxicity and cell-cycle analysis. Environ. Toxicol.21, 256–263. 10.1002/tox.20179
41
FreemanJ. L.RayburnA. L. (2004). In vivo genotoxicity of atrazine to anuran larvae. Mutat. Res.560, 69–78. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2004.02.008
42
FriedmannA. S. (2002). Atrazine inhibition of testosterone production in rat males following peripubertal exposure. Reprod. Toxicol.16, 275–279. 10.1016/s0890-6238(02)00019-9
43
GalbiatiV.BuosoE.d’Emmanuele di Villa BiancaR.PaolaR. D.MorroniF.NocentiniG.et al (2021). Immune and nervous systems interaction in endocrine disruptors toxicity: the case of atrazine. Front. Toxicol.3, 649024. 10.3389/ftox.2021.649024
44
GaoM.ZhuH.GuoJ.LeiY.SunW.LinH. (2022). Tannic acid through ROS/TNF-α/TNFR 1 antagonizes atrazine induced apoptosis, programmed necrosis and immune dysfunction of grass carp hepatocytes. Fish Shellfish Immunol.131, 312–322. 10.1016/j.fsi.2022.09.062
45
GaoS.WangZ.ZhangC.JiaL.ZhangY. (2016). Oral exposure to atrazine induces oxidative stress and calcium homeostasis disruption in spleen of mice. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev.2016, 7978219. 10.1155/2016/7978219
46
GeJ.LiuJ.WangT.HuangD.LiJ.ZhangS.et al (2021). Prolonged exposure to the herbicide atrazine suppresses immune cell functions by inducing spleen cell apoptosis in rats. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.220, 112386. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112386
47
Gely-PernotA.KernanecP. Y.HaoC.SaciS.KernanecP-Y.HaoC.et al (2017). Embryonic exposure to the widely-used herbicide atrazine disrupts meiosis and normal follicle formation in female mice. Sci. Rep.7: 3526. 10.1038/s41598-017-03738-1
48
GluzczakL.MironD. S.MoraesB. S.SimoesR. R.SchetingerM. R. C.MorschV. M.et al (2007). Acute effect of glyphosate herbicide on metabolic and enzymatic parameters of silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen). Comp. Biochem. Physiology146, 519–524. 10.1016/j.cbpc.2007.06.004
49
GoldmanL. R. (1994). Atrazine, simazine and cyanazine: notice of initiation of special review. Federal Register, EPA, Washington, 60412–60443.
50
GreenD. R.ReedJ. C. (1998). Mitochondria and apoptosis. Science281, 1309–1312. 10.1126/science.281.5381.1309
51
GreenleeA. R.EllisT. M.BergR. L. (2004). Low-dose agrochemicals and lawn-care pesticides induce developmental toxicity in murine pre-implantation embryos. Environ. Health Perspect.112, 703–709. 10.1289/ehp.6774
52
HayesT.HastonK.TsuiM.HoangA.HaeffeleC.VonkA. (2003). Atrazine-induced hermaphroditism at 0.1 ppb in American leopard frogs (Rana pipiens): laboratory and field evidence. Environ. Health Perspect.111, 568–575. 10.1289/ehp.5932
53
HayesT. B.AndersonL. L.BeasleyV. R.de SollaS. R.IguchiT.IngrahamH.et al (2011). Demasculinization and feminization of male gonads by atrazine: consistent effects across vertebrate classes. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.127 (1-2), 64–73. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.03.015
54
HayesT. B.CollinsA.LeeM.MendozaM.NoriegaN.StuartA. A.et al (2002). Hermaphroditic, demasculinized frogs after exposure to the herbicide atrazine at low ecologically relevant doses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.99 (8), 5476–5480. 10.1073/pnas.082121499
55
HeckerM.GiesyJ. P.JonesP. D.JoosteA. M.CarrJ. A.SolomonK. R.et al (2004). Plasma sex steroid concentrations and gonadal aromatase activities in African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis) from the corn-growing region of South Africa. Environ. Toxicol. Chem.23, 205–216. 10.1897/03-450
56
HeckerM.KimW. J.ParkJ. W.MurphyM. B.VilleneuveD. L.CoadyK. K.et al (2005). Plasma concentrations of estradiol and testosterone, gonadal aromatase activity and ultrastructure of the testis in Xenopus laevis exposed to estradiol or atrazine. Aquat. Toxicol.72, 383–396. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2005.01.008
57
Hopenhayn-RichC.StumpM. L.BrowningS. R. (2002). Regional assessment of atrazine exposure and incidence of breast and ovarian cancers in Kentucky. Archives Environ. Contam. Toxicol.42, 127–136. 10.1007/s002440010300
58
HussainR.MahmoodF.KhanM. Z.KhanA.MuhammadF. (2011). Pathological and genotoxic effects of atrazine in male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Ecotoxicology20, 1–8. 10.1007/s10646-010-0515-y
59
IbrahimF. S.AliM. M.IssakM.EwaissM. (2015). Atrazine genotoxicity on human placental cells. Am. J. Clin. Exp. Med.3 (4), 194–199. 10.11648/j.ajcem.20150304.21
60
IkejiC. N.AdedaraI. A.FarombiE. O. (2023). Dietary myricetin assuages atrazine-mediated hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis dysfunction in rats. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.30 (6), 15655–15670. 10.1007/s11356-022-23033-5
61
JablonowskiN. D.SchäfferA.BurauelP. (2011). Still present after all these years: persistence plus potential toxicity raise questions about the use of atrazine. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.18, 328–331. 10.1007/s11356-010-0431-y
62
JestadiD. B.PhaniendraA.BabjiU.ShanmuganathanB.PeriyasamyL. (2014). Effects of atrazine on reproductive health of nondiabetic and diabetic male rats. Int. Sch. Res. Notices2014, 676013. 10.1155/2014/676013
63
JinY.WangL.ChenG.LinX.MiaoW.FuZ. (2014). Exposure of mice to atrazine and its metabolite diaminochlorotriazine elicits oxidative stress and endocrine disruption. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol.37, 782–790. 10.1016/j.etap.2014.02.014
64
JinY.WangL.FuZ. (2013). Oral exposure to Atrazine modulates hormone synthesis and the transcription of steroidogenic genes in male peripubertal mice. General Comp. Endocrinol.184, 120–127. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2013.01.010
65
KhozimyA.El-danasouryH.AbuzeidM. (2022). Biochemical effects of treatments with herbicide atrazine in male albino rats. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches27(1), 43–57. 10.21608/jalexu.2022.117684.1044
66
KligermanA. D.DoerrC. L.TennantA. H.PengB. (2000b). Cytogenetic studies of three triazine herbicides. II. in vivo micronucleus studies in mouse bone marrow. Mutat. Res.471 (1-2), 107–112. 10.1016/s1383-5718(00)00124-8
67
KligermanA. D.DoerrC. L.TennantA. H.ZuckerR. M. (2000a). Cytogenetic studies of three triazine herbicides. I. in vitro studies. Mutat. Res.465 (1-2), 53–59. 10.1016/s1383-5718(99)00211-9
68
KmeticI.SrcekG.SlivacI.SimicB.KniewaldZ.KniewaldJ.et al (2008). Atrazine exposure decreases cell proliferation in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cell line. Bull Environ. Contam Toxicol.81, 205–209.
69
KniewaldJ.JakominicM.TomljenovicA.SimicB.RomacP.VranesicD.et al (2000). Disorders of male rat reproductive tract under the influence of atrazine. J. Appl. Toxicol.20, 61–68. 10.1002/(sici)1099-1263(200001/02)20:1<61:aid-jat628>3.0.co;2-3
70
KolpinD. W.ThurmanE. M.LinhartS. M. (1998). The environmental occurrence of herbicides: the importance of degradates in ground water. Archives Environ. Contam. Toxicol.35, 385–390. 10.1007/s002449900392
71
Lagunas-BasaveB.Brito-HernándezA.Saldarriaga-NoreñaH. A.Romero-AguilarM.Vergara-SánchezJ.Moeller-ChávezG. E.et al (2022). Occurrence and risk assessment of atrazine and diuron in well and surface water of a cornfield rural region. Water14(22), 3790. 10.3390/w14223790
72
LavilleN.BalaguerP.BrionF.HinfrayN.CasellasC.PorcherJ. M.et al (2006). Modulation of aromatase activity and mRNA by various selected pesticides in the human choriocarcinoma JEG-3 cell line. Toxicology228 (1), 98–108. 10.1016/j.tox.2006.08.021
73
LiY.GuoR.LiangX.YaoB.YanS.GuoY.et al (2023). Pollution characteristics, ecological and health risks of herbicides in a drinking water source and its inflowing rivers in North China. Environ. Pollut.334, 122130. 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122130
74
LimS.AhnS. Y.SongI. C.ChungM. H.JangH. C.ParkK. S.et al (2009). Chronic exposure to the herbicide, atrazine, causes mitochondrial dysfunction and insulin resistance. PLoS ONE4, e5186. 10.1371/journal.pone.0005186
75
LinZ.DoddC. A.FilipovN. M. (2013). Differentiation state-dependent effects of in vitro exposure to atrazine or its metabolite diaminochlorotriazine in a dopaminergic cell line. Life Sci.92 (1), 81–90. 10.1016/j.lfs.2012.10.027
76
LioiM. B.ScarfiM. R.SantoroA.BarbieriR.ZeniO.SalveminiF.et al (1998). Cytogenetic damage and induction of pro-oxidant state in human lymphocytes exposed in vitro to gliphosate, vinclozolin, atrazine, and DPX-E9636. Environ. Mol. Mutagen.32(1), 39–46. 10.1002/(sici)1098-2280(1998)32:1<39:aid-em5>3.0.co;2-6
77
LiuB.ZengQ.ChenH.LiaoJ.BaiY.HanQ.et al (2021). The hepatotoxicity of altrazine exposure in mice involves the intestinal microbiota. Chemosphere272, 129572. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129572
78
LiuW.DuY.LiuJ.WangH.SunD.LiangD.et al (2014). Effects of atrazine on the oxidative damage of kidney in Wister rats. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med.7 (10), 3235–3243.
79
LiuX. M.ShaoJ. Z.XiangL. X.ChenX. Y. (2006). Cytotoxic effects and apoptosis induction of atrazine in a grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) cell line. Environ. Toxicol.21, 80–89. 10.1002/tox.20159
80
MalikS. I.TerzoudiG. L.PanteliasG. E. (2004). SCE analysis in G2 lymphocyte prematurely condensed chromosomes after exposure to atrazine: the non-dose-dependent increase in homologous recombinational events does not support its genotoxic mode of action. Cytogenet. Genome Res.104, 315–319. 10.1159/000077509
81
ManskeM. K.BeltzL. A.DhanwadK. R. (2004). Low-Level atrazine exposure decreases cell proliferation in human fibroblasts. Archives Environ. Contam. Toxicol.46, 438–444. 10.1007/s00244-003-3087-5
82
MeisnerL. F.BelluckD. A.RoloVB. D. (1992). Cytogenetic effects of alachlor and/or atrazine in vivo and in vitro. Environ. Mol. Mutagen.19, 77–82. 10.1002/em.2850190110
83
Méndez-TepepaM.Hernández-PérezK.Juárez-SantacruzL.Cruz-LumbrerasS. R.GarcÃa-NietoE.Anaya-HernándezA.et al (2023). Cytotoxic effects of the atrazine herbicide on erythrocytes and liver damage in Lithobates spectabilis. Fishes8 (4), 207. 10.3390/fishes8040207
84
MizotaK.UedaH. (2006). Endocrine disrupting chemical atrazine causes degranulation through gq/11 protein-coupled neurosteroid receptor in mast cells. Toxicol. Sci.90 (2), 362–368. 10.1093/toxsci/kfj087
85
MohammedE. T.SafwatG. M.BahnasawyE. A.Abdel-RazikA. H.MohamedD. S. (2023). Zinc oxide nanoparticles and vitamin c ameliorate atrazine-induced hepatic apoptosis in rat via CYP450s/ROS pathway and immunomodulation. Biol. Trace Elem. Res.201, 5257–5271. 10.1007/s12011-023-03587-2
86
MooreA.WaringC. P. (1998). Mechanistic effects of a triazine pesticide on reproductive endocrine function in mature male Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) parr. Pesticide Biochem. Physiology62, 41–50. 10.1006/pest.1998.2366
87
NakanoK.VousdenK. H. (2001). PUMA, a novel proapoptotic gene, is induced by p53. Mol. Cell.7 (3), 683–694. 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00214-3
88
Ndufeiya-KumasiL. C.AbarikwuS. O.OhanadorR.OmoregieE. S. (2022). Curcumin improves the protective effects of quercetin against atrazine-induced testicular injury in adult Wistar rats. Andrologia54, e14445. 10.1111/and.14445
89
NgI. H.YeapY. Y.OngL. S.JansD. A.BogoyevitchM. A. (2014). Oxidative stress impairs multiple regulatory events to drive persistent cytokine-stimulated STAT3 phosphorylation. Biochimica Biophysica Acta1843 (3), 483–494. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.11.015
90
Nieves-PuigdollerK.BjornssonB. N.McCormickS. D. (2007). Effects of hexazinone and atrazine on the physiology and endocrinology of smolt development in Atlantic salmon. Aquat. Toxicol.84, 27–37. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.05.011
91
NwaniC. D.LakraW. S.NagpureN. S.KumarR.KushwahaB.SrivastavaS. K. (2010). Toxicity of the herbicide atrazine: effects on lipid peroxidation and activities of antioxidant enzymes in the freshwater fish Channa punctatus (bloch). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health7 (8), 3298–3312. 10.3390/ijerph7083298
92
OlejnikA. M.MarecikR.BiałasW.CyplikP.GrajekW. (2010). In vitro studies on atrazine effects on human intestinal cells. Water Air Soil Pollut.213, 401–411.
93
OwagboriayeF.OladunjoyeR.AdekunleO.AdelekeM.SalisuT.AdenekanA.et al (2022). First report on atrazine monitoring in drinking water from Ijebu-North, South-West Nigeria: human health risk evaluation and reproductive toxicity studies. Front. Toxicol.4, 975636. 10.3389/ftox.2022.975636
94
PerryM. J.ChristianiD. C.MathewJ.DegenhardtD.TortorelliJ.StraussJ.et al (2001). Urinalysis of atrazine exposure in farm pesticide applicators. Toxicol. Industrial Health16, 285–290. 10.1177/074823370001600705
95
PinchukL. M.LeeS. R.FilipovN. M. (2007). In vitro atrazine exposure affects the phenotypic and functional maturation of dendritic cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.223, 206–217. 10.1016/j.taap.2007.06.004
96
PinchukL. M.LeeS. R.FilipovN. M. (2007). In vitro atrazine exposure affects the phenotypic and functional maturation of dendritic cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.223 (3), 206–217. 10.1016/j.taap.2007.06.004
97
PinoA.MauraA.GrilloP. (1988). DNA damage in stomach, kidney, liver and lung of rats treated with atrazine. Mutat. Res. Lett.209 (3-4), 145–147. 10.1016/0165-7992(88)90032-2
98
PogrmicK.FaS.DakicV.KaisarevicS.KovacevicR. (2009). Atrazine oral Exposure of peripubertal male rats down-regulates steroidogenesis gene expression in Leydig cells. Toxicol. Sci.111, 189–197. 10.1093/toxsci/kfp135
99
Pogrmic-MajkicK.FaS.DakicV.KaisarevicS.KovacevicR. (2010). Upregulation of peripubertal rat Leydig cell steroidogenesis following 24 h in vitro and in vivo exposure to atrazine. Toxicol. Sci.118, 52–60. 10.1093/toxsci/kfq227
100
PowellE. R.FaldladdinN.RandA. D.PelzerD.SchrunkE. M.DhanwadaK. R. (2011). Atrazine exposure leads to altered growth of HepG2 cells. Toxicol. Vitro25, 644–651. 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.01.001
101
RajkovicV.DjolaiM.MatavulJM. (2011). Alterations in jejunal morphology and serotonin-containing enteroendocrine cells in peripubertal male rats associated with subchronic atrazine exposure. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.74 (8), 2304–2309. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.07.029
102
RashadW. A.SaadawyS. F.RefaayN. E. (2023). Mitigating effect of L-carnitine against atrazine-induced hepatotoxicity: histopathological and biochemical analyses in albino rats. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.30, 22034–22045. 10.1007/s11356-022-23568-7
103
RibasG.SurrallesJ.CarbonellE.CreusA.XamenaN.MarcosR. (1998). Lack of genotoxicity of the herbicide atrazine in cultured human lymphocytes. Mutat. Res.416, 93–99. 10.1016/s1383-5718(98)00081-3
104
RichJ. D.GabrielS. M.Schultz-NortonJ. R. (2012). In vitro effects of herbicides and insecticides on human breast cells. Int. Sch. Res. Notices2012, 232461. 10.5402/2012/232461
105
RohT.KnappettP. S. K.HanD.LudewigG.KellyK. M.WangK.et al (2023). Characterization of arsenic and atrazine contaminations in drinking water in Iowa: a public health concern. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health20 (7), 5397. 10.3390/ijerph20075397
106
RohrJ. R.McCoyK. A. (2010). A qualitative meta-analysis reveals consistent effects of atrazine on freshwater fish and amphibians. Environ. Health Perspect.118 (1), 20–32. 10.1289/ehp.0901164
107
RoloffB. D.BelluckD. A.MeisnerL. F. (1992). Cytogenetic studies of herbicide interactions in vitro and in vivo using atrazine and linuron. Archives Environ. Contam. Toxicol.22 (3), 267–271. 10.1007/BF00212084
108
RossM. K.JonesT. L.FilipovN. M. (2009). Disposition of the herbicide 2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine (atrazine) and its major metabolites in mice: a liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis of urine, plasma, and tissue levels. Drug Metabolism Dispos.37, 776–786. 10.1124/dmd.108.024927
109
RoweA. M.BrundageK. M.BarnettJ. B. (2007). In vitro atrazine-exposure inhibits human natural killer cell lytic granule release. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.221, 179–188. 10.1016/j.taap.2007.01.012
110
SaalF. S.WelshonsW. V. (2006). Large effects from small exposures. II. The importance of positive controls in low-dose research on bisphenol A. Environ. Res.100, 50–76. 10.1016/j.envres.2005.09.001
111
SaalfeldG. Q.Varela JuniorA. S.CastroT.PereiraF. A.GhellerS. M. M.da SilvaA. C.et al (2018). Low atrazine dosages reduce sperm quality of Calomys laucha mice. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.25, 2924–2931. 10.1007/s11356-017-0657-z
112
SandersonJ. T.LetcherR. J.HeneweerM.GiesyJ. P.van den BergM. (2001). Effects of chloro-s-triazine herbicides and metabolites on aromatase activity in various human cell lines and on vitellogenin production in male carp hepatocytes. Environ. Health Perspect.109 (10), 1027–1031. 10.1289/ehp.011091027
113
SandersonJ. T.SeinenW.GiesyJ. P.van den BergM. (2000). 2-Chloro-s-triazine herbicides induce aromatase (CYP19) activity in H295R human adrenocortical carcinoma cells: a novel mechanism for estrogenicity?Toxicol. Sci.54 (1), 121–127. 10.1093/toxsci/54.1.121
114
Santa MariaC.MorenoJ.Lopez-CamposJ. L. (1987). Hepatotoxicity induced by the herbicide atrazine in the rat. J. Appl. Toxicol.7 (6), 373–378. 10.1002/jat.2550070605
115
Santos-HernándezA. S.Hinojosa-ReyesL.Carmen Sáenz-TaveraI.Hernández-RamÃrezA.Guzmán-MarJ. L. (2018). Atrazine and 2, 4-D determination in corn samples using microwave assisted extraction and on-line solid-phase extraction coupled to liquid chromatography. J. Mexican Chem. Soc.62 (2), 282–294. 10.29356/jmcs.v62i2.475
116
SawickiB.DurandG.DewitteJ. D.RatanasavanhD.RicheC.LegliseM. C. (1998). Myelosuppressive activity of two herbicides, atrazine and dinoterb, on human haematopoietic progenitor cells: an in vitro assay to evaluate the effects of intermediate or long-term exposure. Toxicol. Vitro12, 183–190. 10.1016/s0887-2333(97)00109-4
117
SchroederJ. C.OlshanA. F.BaricR.DentG. A.WeinbergC. R.YountB.et al (2001). Agricultural risk factors for t(14;18) subtypes of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Epidemiology12, 701–709. 10.1097/00001648-200111000-00020
118
ShanW.HuW.WenY.DingX.MaX.YanW.et al (2021). Evaluation of atrazine neurodevelopment toxicity in vitro-application of hESC-based neural differentiation model. Reprod. Toxicol.103, 149–158. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2021.06.009
119
SharmaP.KhanI. A.SinghR. (2018). Curcumin and quercetin ameliorated cypermethrin and deltamethrin-induced reproductive system impairment in male Wistar rats by upregulating the activity of pituitary-gonadal hormones and steroidogenic enzymes. Int. J. Fertil. Steril.12, 72–80. 10.22074/ijfs.2018.5160
120
SharmaS.SarkarJ.HaldarC.SinhaS. (2014). Melatonin Reverses Fas, E2F-1 and endoplasmic reticulum stress mediated apoptosis and dysregulation of autophagy induced by the herbicide atrazine in murine splenocytes. PLoS ONE9 (9), e108602. 10.1371/journal.pone.0108602
121
SinghM.SandhirR.KiranR. (2011). Effects on antioxidant status of liver following atrazine exposure and its attenuation by vitamin E. Exp. Toxicol. Pathology63, 269–276. 10.1016/j.etp.2010.01.005
122
SolomonK. R. (2009). Is atrazine a potent endocrine disruptor chemical?Environ. Sci. Technol.43, 2993–2994. 10.1021/es900495z
123
SwanS.KruseR.LiuF.BarrD.DrobnisE.RedmonJ.et al (2003). Semen quality in relation to biomarkers of pesticide exposure. Environ. Health Perspect.111, 1478–1484. 10.1289/ehp.6417
124
TaetsC.ArefS.RayburnA. L. (1998). The clastogenic potential of triazine herbicide combinations found in potable water supplies. Environ. Health Perspect.106 (4), 197–201. 10.1289/ehp.98106197
125
Tavera-MendozaL.RubyS.BrousseauP.FournierM.CyrD.MarcoglieseD. (2002). Response of the amphibian tadpole (Xenopus laevis) to atrazine during sexual differentiation of the ovary. Environ. Toxicol. Chem.21, 1264–1267. 10.1897/1551-5028(2002)021<1264:rotatx>2.0.co;2
126
TchounwouP. B.WilsonB. A.IshaqueA. B.SchneiderJ. (2001). Atrazine potentiation of arsenic trioxide-induced cytotoxicity and gene expression in human liver carcinoma cells (HepG2). Mol. Cell. Biochem.222 (1-2), 49–59. 10.1023/a:1017903005541
127
TennantA. H.PengB.KligermanA. D. (2001). Genotoxicity studies of three triazine herbicides: in vivo studies using the alkaline single cell gel (SCG) assay. Mutat. Res.493 (1-2), 1–10. 10.1016/s1383-5718(01)00145-0
128
ThompsonP. A.KhatamiM.BagloleC. J.SunJ.HarrisS. A.MoonE. Y.et al (2015). Environmental immune disruptors, inflammation and cancer risk. Carcinogenesis36, S232–S253. 10.1093/carcin/bgv038
129
ThorntonB. J.ElthonT. E.CernyR. L.SiegfriedB. D. (2010). Proteomic analysis of atrazine exposure in Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: drosophilidae). Chemosphere81, 235–241. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.06.032
130
ThuesonL. E.EmmonsT. R.BrowningD. L.KreitingerJ. M.ShepherdD. M.WetzelS. A. (2015). In vitro exposure to the herbicide atrazine inhibits T cell activation, proliferation, and cytokine production and significantly increases the frequency of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Toxicol. Sci.143 (2), 418–429. 10.1093/toxsci/kfu242
131
TianY.HeJ.LiuN.HuangD.LiuZ.YangY.et al (2018). Atrazine exposure improves the proliferation of H22 cells in vitro and in vivo. R. Soc. Chem. Adv.8 (39), 21759–21767. 10.1039/c8ra02671h
132
TinfoN. S.HotchkissM. G.BuckalewA. R.ZorrillaL. M.CooperR. L.LawS. C. (2011). Understanding the effects of atrazine on steroidogenesis in rat granulosa and H295R adrenal cortical carcinoma cells. Reprod. Toxicol.31 (2), 184–193. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2010.11.005
133
VenturaB. C.De AngelisF.Marin-MoralesM. A. (2008). Mutagenic and genotoxic effects of the atrazine herbicide in Oreochromis niloticus (Perciformes, Cichlidae) detected by the micronuclei test and the comet assay. Pesticide Biochem. Physiology90, 42–51. 10.1016/j.pestbp.2007.07.009
134
Victor-CostaA. B.BandeiraS. M. C.OliveiraA. G.MahechaG. A. B.OliveiraC. A. (2010). Changes in testicular morphology and steroidogenesis in adult rats exposed to atrazine. Reprod. Toxicol.29, 323–331. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.12.006
135
XieJ.LinL.SánchezO. F.BryanC.FreemanJ. L.YuanC. (2021). Pre-differentiation exposure to low-dose of atrazine results in persistent phenotypic changes in human neuronal cell lines. Environ. Pollut.271, 116379. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116379
136
YinX. M.DingW. X.GaoW. (2008). Autophagy in the liver. Hepatology47, 1773–1785. 10.1002/hep.22146
137
YuQ. Q.LuF. F.MaL. Y.YangH.SongN. H. (2021). Residues of reduced herbicides terbuthylazine, ametryn, and atrazine and toxicology to maize and the environment through salicylic acid. ACS Omega6 (41), 27396–27404. 10.1021/acsomega.1c04315
138
YuanB.LiangS.JinY.-X.ZhangM.-J.ZhangJ.-B.KimN.-H. (2017). Toxic effects of atrazine on porcine oocytes and possible mechanisms of action. PLoS ONE12 (6), e0179861. 10.1371/journal.pone.0179861
139
YuanxiangJ.XiangxiangZ.DezhaoL.ZhengweiF. (2012). Proteomic analysis of hepatic tissue in adult female zebrafish (Danio rerio) exposed to atrazine. Archives Environ. Contam. Toxicol.62 (1), 127–134. 10.1007/s00244-011-9678-7
140
ZayaR. M.AminiZ.WhitakerA. S.KohlerS. L.IdeC. F. (2011). Atrazine exposure affects growth, body condition and liver health in Xenopus laevis tadpoles. Aquat. Toxicol.104, 243–253. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2011.04.021
141
ZeljezicD.Garaj-VrhovacV.PerkovicP. (2006). Evaluation of DNA damage induced by atrazine and atrazine-based herbicide in human lymphocytes in vitro using a comet and DNA diffusion assay. Toxicol. Vitro20, 923–935. 10.1016/j.tiv.2006.01.017
Summary
Keywords
atrazine, oxidative stress, antioxidant vitamins, flavonoids, cytotoxicity, testes, apoptosis
Citation
Abarikwu SO, Ezim OE, Ikeji CN and Farombi EO (2023) Atrazine: cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, apoptosis, testicular effects and chemopreventive Interventions. Front. Toxicol. 5:1246708. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2023.1246708
Received
24 June 2023
Accepted
19 September 2023
Published
09 October 2023
Volume
5 - 2023
Edited by
Camilo Dias Seabra Pereira, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil
Reviewed by
Folarin Owagboriaye, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Nigeria
Marina Trevizan Guerra, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2023 Abarikwu, Ezim, Ikeji and Farombi.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ebenezer O. Farombi, olatunde_farombi@yahoo.com; Sunny O. Abarikwu, sunny.abarikwu@uniport.edu.ng
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.