EDITORIAL article

Front. Toxicol., 21 August 2026

Sec. Environmental Toxicology

Volume 8 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2026.1925459

Editorial: Environmental toxicity in metabolism

  • Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States

Introduction

Environmental chemical exposures are increasingly recognized as critical determinants of metabolic disease risk. Among these, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are of particular concern due to their environmental persistence, bioaccumulation, and strong mechanistic links to dysregulated lipid metabolism and hepatic dysfunction. Emerging evidence supports the concept that PFAS act not as inert contaminants, but as biologically active metabolic disruptors capable of reprogramming systemic energy homeostasis and cellular bioenergetics.

This Research Topic, Environmental Toxicity in Metabolism, integrates experimental, mechanistic, and systems-level studies that collectively support a paradigm in which environmental chemicals actively reshape metabolic networks. Recent PFAS-focused work highlights sex-dependent lipid metabolic disruption and hepatic steatosis mechanisms involving PPAR signaling and bile acid metabolism regulation (), reinforcing PFAS as central drivers of metabolic imbalance.

PFAS as lipid mimics and nuclear receptor modulators

A central mechanistic theme emerging across this Research Topic is the structural similarity of PFAS to endogenous fatty acids, enabling interactions with lipid-sensing nuclear receptors such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs). Through these interactions, PFAS influence transcriptional programs governing fatty acid transport, β-oxidation, and lipid storage.

Mechanistic reviews demonstrate that PFAS exposure consistently disrupts lipid metabolic pathways and contributes to dyslipidemia and fatty liver disease through receptor-mediated signaling perturbations and altered lipid homeostasis (). These findings are supported by more recent studies linking PFAS exposure to sex-dependent alterations in rate-limiting enzymes governing hepatic lipid flux ().

Mitochondrial dysfunction and bioenergetic stress

Mitochondrial impairment is a consistent mechanistic outcome of PFAS exposure. PFAS reduce oxidative phosphorylation efficiency, increase reactive oxygen species (ROS), and disrupt electron transport chain function, collectively producing a state of bioenergetic stress.

Recent experimental evidence demonstrates chain-length–dependent mitochondrial toxicity among perfluoroalkyl acids, linking PFAS molecular structure directly to mitochondrial dysfunction severity and metabolic failure (Kam et al.). These effects converge on impaired fatty acid oxidation and accumulation of incomplete lipid intermediates, establishing mitochondrial dysfunction as a central node in PFAS-induced metabolic disease.

Peroxisomal compensation and redox imbalance

PFAS exposure induces compensatory activation of peroxisomal β-oxidation pathways, including upregulation of acyl-CoA oxidase 1 (ACOX1). While initially adaptive, this response generates hydrogen peroxide as a metabolic byproduct, increasing oxidative stress burden.

The resulting mitochondrial–peroxisomal imbalance produces a redox disequilibrium that amplifies lipid peroxidation, stress signaling pathways, and hepatocellular injury. This metabolic inefficiency represents a defining feature of PFAS-driven bioenergetic disruption.

Hepatic metabolic reprogramming as a central toxicity axis

The liver is consistently identified as a primary target organ for PFAS toxicity. Across experimental systems, PFAS exposure is associated with hepatomegaly, altered lipid distribution, and accumulation of triglycerides and bioactive lipid intermediates.

Mechanistically, PFAS alter hepatic fatty acid uptake, mitochondrial β-oxidation, and lipid export pathways, producing coordinated metabolic reprogramming. Importantly, recent studies demonstrate that these hepatic effects are often sex-dependent and associated with disruptions in gluconeogenesis, bile acid metabolism, and lipid synthesis pathways ().

Endocrine disruption and systemic metabolic effects

Beyond direct metabolic effects, PFAS disrupt endocrine signaling networks including thyroid hormone regulation, glucocorticoid signaling, and insulin sensitivity. These hormonal disruptions interact with intracellular metabolic pathways to produce multi-system metabolic dysregulation.

The convergence of endocrine disruption and mitochondrial stress supports the concept that PFAS function as systems-level metabolic reprogrammers rather than isolated pathway toxicants, affecting inter-organ communication and whole-body energy balance.

Mixture toxicology and real-world exposure complexity

Human exposure to PFAS occurs as complex mixtures rather than single compounds, including legacy and emerging PFAS with varying chain lengths and biological persistence. Recent studies demonstrate that mixture exposures produce non-linear and sometimes synergistic metabolic effects, including lipid dysregulation and oxidative stress amplification.

These findings align with broader PFAS toxicology literature demonstrating that biological outcomes depend on chemical structure, mixture composition, and physiological context, reinforcing the need for mixture-aware risk assessment frameworks ().

Emerging mechanisms in PFAS-driven metabolic toxicity

Recent work expands PFAS toxicology into additional mechanistic domains, including ferroptosis, lipid peroxidation pathways, and regulated cell death processes driven by oxidative lipid damage.

Transcriptomic and systems-level studies further demonstrate PFAS-induced tissue-specific metabolic reprogramming and broad molecular remodeling across multiple organs, reinforcing their classification as multi-system metabolic disruptors ().

Toward integrated environmental metabolic toxicology

Collectively, the studies included in this Research Topic span mechanistic, mitochondrial, systems biology, and mixture toxicology frameworks, supporting an integrated model in which environmental exposures actively reshape metabolic biology.

Future priorities include defining exposure thresholds for early metabolic reprogramming, resolving tissue-specific PFAS partitioning, quantifying mitochondrial–peroxisomal flux dynamics, and integrating mixture toxicology into regulatory frameworks. Importantly, linking molecular signatures of PFAS exposure to epidemiological outcomes will be essential for translating mechanistic insights into public health relevance.

Conclusion

The contributions within this Research Topic support a paradigm shift in which PFAS are recognized as active regulators of metabolic biology rather than passive environmental contaminants. Through coordinated disruption of lipid sensing pathways, mitochondrial bioenergetics, peroxisomal oxidation, endocrine signaling, and immune-metabolic networks, PFAS fundamentally reprogram energy metabolism across biological systems.

By centering PFAS within environmental metabolic toxicology, this Research Topic advances a mechanistic framework connecting persistent environmental exposure to the global burden of metabolic disease. This integrated perspective provides a foundation for improved toxicological modeling, refined risk assessment, and ultimately more effective strategies to mitigate environmentally driven metabolic dysfunction.

Statements

Author contributions

TW: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    CuiY.ZhouQ.WangY. (2025). Toxic effects of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) on human health: A review. Environ. Res.191, 110153.

  • 2

    HariA.AbdulHameedM. D. M.Balik-MeisnerM. R.MavD.PhadkeD. P.SchollE. H.et al (2024). Exposure to PFAS chemicals induces sex-dependent alterations in key rate-limiting steps of lipid metabolism in liver steatosis. Front. Toxicol.6, 1390196.

  • 3

    KangN.ZhaoY.HuangZ.LiR.MaX.DingS.et al (2026). Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances mixture exposure is associated with colorectal cancer TNM stage. Front. Toxicol.8, 1904192.

  • 4

    WangQ.ChungS.WangM. (2025). Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) toxicity and mitigation of adipogenic dysregulation in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Food Chem. Toxicol.204, 115649.

Summary

Keywords

endocrine disruption, environmental toxicology, lipid metabolism, metabolic reprogramming, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, peroxisomal β-oxidation

Citation

Woodlief T (2026) Editorial: Environmental toxicity in metabolism. Front. Toxicol. 8:1925459. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2026.1925459

Received

01 July 2026

Accepted

06 July 2026

Published

21 August 2026

Volume

8 - 2026

Edited and reviewed by

Sara Cristina Antunes, University of Porto, Portugal

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Tracey Woodlief,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics