Abstract
Reports of renal neoplasia are rare in neotropical wildcats. Ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) are medium-sized wildcats living in America’s tropical forests. A 12-year-old captive ocelot was diagnosed with a renal mass occupying approximately 25% of the total right kidney volume. The tissue was stained with routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and periodic acid–Schiff (PAS). Immunohistochemistry with the following markers was performed: cytokeratin (CK) AE1/AE3, CK19, CK 7, CD10, vimentin, Melan A, HMB45, Pax-8, and Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1). Histopathology revealed a well-differentiated epithelial tubular neoplasia with less than one mitotic figure per 2.37mm2 field. Vimentin and Pax-8 were the only positive markers. Immunohistochemically, neoplasia was diagnosed as a renal adenoma. Renal adenomas are seldom reported in neotropical wildcats. Reports on wild species are valuable for properly establishing a clinical prognosis for captive species. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that provides detailed microscopic and immunohistochemical descriptions of renal adenoma in a captive ocelot.
1 Introduction
Wildlife neoplasia is still a developing area in veterinary medicine. Wildlife neoplasia is underreported and rarely detected (1). Most reports are from captive specimens, and the conservation implications of cancer in wildlife are still being discussed and researched. However, it can reduce reproductive success, which alters population dynamics and leads to population declines (2).
The ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) is listed as a “Least Concern” species on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) red list of threatened species (3). However, in Costa Rica, it is classified as an endangered species (4). Therefore, ocelot populations are threatened by habitat loss, anthropogenic pressure, illegal pet trade, poaching, and logging on a local scale (5, 6).
There are several studies describing neoplasia in captive felids/wildcats. In one study including 40 individuals, the authors did not report any renal neoplasia from nine different felid species. This study did not include species from the Leopardus genus (7). Similarly, in a review of 100 feline neoplasias in South Africa, there was no primary kidney neoplasia (8). In another study of 195 non-domestic felids, including 3 ocelots, there was no description of any renal neoplasia (9). Regarding renal adenomas in wild felids, a renal tubular cystadenoma was reported in a lion (Panthera leo) (10). In Italy, out of 24 neoplasias from Panthera spp., one was a renal adenocarcinoma (11).
Apart from felids, renal adenomas have been described in domestic species, including rats (12), Guinea baboons (13), budgerigars (14), Toco toucans (15), sea horses (16), Red Oscars (17), and several other species (18).
2 Case description
A 12-year-old captive male ocelot part of the Rescate Wildlife Rescue Center’s exhibit collection was diagnosed using ultrasound with a renal mass on the cranial pole of the right kidney as part of its annual health check. The differential diagnoses were: renal cyst, lymphoma, carcinoma, adenoma, or an abscess. A decision was made to perform a fine-needle aspiration (FNA) from the mass to obtain a preliminary diagnosis. Cytology showed epithelial cells with moderate anisokaryosis and anisocytosis, naked nuclei, and pseudorosettes consisting of 7–8 cells with a single nucleolus, eosinophilic nucleus, and vacuolated cytoplasm. The preliminary cytological diagnosis was a well-differentiated renal carcinoma. The animal was euthanized 1 week later after the FNA by the veterinary staff using pentobarbital (Euthanex©) because of age-related lameness. A full post-mortem examination was performed with no other findings besides a right kidney mass. Focally, a firm, beige, round to oval, and sized 2.6 × 2.2 × 1.6 cm renal mass was observed. This was affecting approximately 25% of the renal tissue. The mass extended from the medulla to the cortex, protruding above the renal surface (Figure 1). After dissection, there was no presence of hemorrhage or necrosis on the cutting surface. The kidney was placed in 10% buffered formalin. After trimming, the sample was processed for routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) staining. Several immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers were chosen to characterize the likely cellular origin of the neoplasia (Table 1).
Figure 1
Table 1
| Target antigen | Positivity | Host | Source | Antigen retrieval | Chromogen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK AE1/AE3 | − | Mouse | Leica Biosystems PA 0909 | Proteinase K | DAB |
| CK19 | − | DAB | |||
| CK 7 | − | Mouse | Leica Biosystems 0942 | ER1 | DAB |
| CD10 | − | ||||
| Vimentin | + | Mouse | Ventana Medical Systems 790-2917 | ER1 | DAB |
| Melan-A | − | Mouse | Leica Biosystems PA 0223 | ER2 | DAB |
| HMB-45 | − | Mouse | Ventana Medical Systems 790-4366 | Proteinase K | DAB |
| Pax-8 | + | Mouse | Leica Biosystems MRQ-50 | ER2 | DAB |
| WT1 | − | Mouse | Leica Biosystems WT49 | ER2 | DAB |
Immunohistochemistry positivity with antibody host, source, antigen retrieval method, and chromogen.
Microscopically (Figure 1), the neoplasm was well-demarcated, densely cellular, and non-encapsulated with expansile growth. Neoplastic cells formed a diffuse tubular pattern without significant tubule-papillary or papillary formation. The neoplastic cells are supported by a fine fibrovascular stroma. Cytological and nuclear features are well-differentiated cubical epithelial cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. The nuclei are centered, with scattered chromatin and a single nucleolus, with minimal signs of nuclear atypia. The mitotic count was less than 1 per 2.37mm2 field. There was no infiltrative growth or metastasis. The renal tissue surrounding the neoplastic cells is moderately compressed, without evidence of necrosis. There was also scattered tumor-associated lymphocytic infiltration.
The PAS stained a highly positive material contained in the lumen of the acinar structures of the adenoma. Based on published markers for veterinary and human renal tumors (19–21), we selected eight antibodies for immunohistochemical characterization (Table 1). It was found that tumor tissue was only positive for two IHC markers. Epithelial cells forming the tubules and acinar structures had a positive cytoplasmic labeling for vimentin and a positive nuclear labeling for Pax-8 immunomarkers (Figure 1).
3 Discussion
Well-differentiated renal carcinomas histologically make it challenging to differentiate them from renal adenomas (17). Therefore, a correct diagnosis is critical to establishing a clinical prognosis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first renal adenoma reported in the Leopardus genus, which includes 13 New World felids. Adenomas are scarcely reported in other wild cats; for instance, in one study of 108 large felid neoplasias, one tiger (Panthera tigris) had a renal adenoma (22). Furthermore, a jungle cat (Felis chaus) was reported to have multicentric adenomas, including thyroid, gastric, and renal adenomas (23), and a puma with a renal cortical adenoma (24).
The occurrence in an ocelot is valuable since this species’ neoplasia is rarely reported in Latin America. Recently, other neoplasias have been documented in ocelots, including a seminoma, pulmonary adenocarcinoma (25), and transitional cell carcinoma (26).
Adenomas are rare tumors in domestic animals and are usually clinically silent (27). Nonetheless, depending on the anatomical position within the renal parenchyma, they can obstruct the urinary flow and develop hydronephrosis (28). Furthermore, it has been reported that hypertrophic osteopathy can occur concomitantly with renal adenomas in cats (29). In other lesions and anatomical locations, adenomas are well-known to be premalignant lesions; for example, colorectal adenoma is a precancerous lesion for colorectal carcinoma (30). For renal carcinomas, there is evidence in humans that papillary adenomas and renal cell carcinoma may arise from the same precursor lesion based on chromosomal mutations (31). In veterinary medicine, this progression from adenoma to carcinoma has been chiefly explored for mammary neoplasia (32, 33).
This renal carcinoma case was well-differentiated and exhibited histologic features similar to those described in adenomas in dogs and cats. In domestic small animal species, an arbitrary cutoff of 2 cm or larger is used to differentiate renal carcinoma from benign lesions. Nonetheless, this size cutoff for adenoma and carcinoma in exotic/wildlife species has yet to be established. Other criteria for differentiating renal carcinoma from benign lesions include the presence of metastases, increased mitotic count, and invasion into surrounding tissues, as well as the presence of anaplastic cellular and nuclear features (27). All these malignant criteria were absent in this case. The only malignant criterion observed in this case, according to domestic classification standards, was the size of neoplasia, which measured 2.6 cm (greater than 2 cm). Based on these findings, the diagnosis of this neoplasia as an adenoma over a well-differentiated carcinoma. The positive PAS material in the lumen of the acinar structures is most likely glycoproteins, which may contribute to the formation of urinary casts (Figure 1). Although there are several PAS-positive urinary casts, the ones composed of Tamm–Horsfall protein (uromodulin) have a very strong PAS staining (34) similar to this case. This protein is secreted by the epithelium of the thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle and early distal tubules (35).
Vimentin and Pax-8 were the only positive markers for the IHC. Vimentin is an intermediate filament used as a positive marker for mesenchymal tumors, but it can label several carcinomas (36). In this case, vimentin moderately labeled normal collecting tubules and distal tubules. In domestic cats, vimentin has been reported to be expressed in distal tubules and collecting ducts but not in proximal tubules (19). Vimentin can positively stain several subtypes of renal carcinomas originating from different renal tubules (22, 36, 37). In humans, this generalized positive labeling of vimentin in renal carcinomas is attributed to an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (38); nonetheless, this hypothesis has not been thoroughly investigated in veterinary medicine for renal carcinomas. In this same study, cytokeratin (CK) AE1/AE3 labeled normal distal tubules, collecting ducts, and renal pelvic epithelium, while CK7 only labeled collecting ducts and renal pelvic epithelium. Although CK AE1/AE3 is commonly used as an epithelial marker, in this case, it did not label the neoplastic cells. This could suggest that this adenoma could have proliferated from proximal tubules since they are not labeled by this marker. In humans, it has been reported that metanephric adenoma is negative for CK7 staining (39).
Pax-8 is a nuclear marker for epithelial cells in several tissues, including renal, thyroid, and endometrial (40). It has been established in human and veterinary medicine as a marker to help detect different neoplasias of renal origin, including renal carcinoma (20). In dogs, it has been established as a positive marker for renal thyroid and upper Müllerian tract neoplasms (41). To the best of our knowledge, there are no other reports of the use of Pax-8 for renal adenomas in veterinary medicine. In human medicine, it has been reported as a positive marker for nephrogenic adenoma (42).
We also performed labeling for HMB45 and Melan-1 since tissue positivity has been reported in renal carcinoma in humans (21). Finally, there are no specific markers for nephroblastoma (Wilms’ tumor) in veterinary medicine. Nonetheless, we used it as it has been done in other veterinary cases (43).
Regarding the specific cellular origin of this renal adenoma, there is no clear evidence of the origin. The vimentin-positive marking and the presence of presumptive Tamm–Horsfall protein suggest that it could have a distal tubule origin. Nonetheless, the negative CK AE1/AE3 suggests that it could have a proximal tubule origin.
Wildlife neoplasia and exotic species reports are still infrequent. New reports such as this case contribute to the further characterization of this pathological process. Unfortunately, the availability of species-specific IHC markers and the small number of reports limit the development of proper tumor classification guidelines. From a clinical point of view, reports and immunophenotyping of these adenomas can help in establishing the origin of neoplasia in cases of metastasis with an established tissue origin. This information is useful for the prognosis and clinical management of this species, contributing to the conservation of the species, especially in individuals involved in an ex situ reproduction program aimed at enhancing genetic diversity in free-ranging populations.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.
Author contributions
LR-V: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SM: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. IH: Methodology, Writing – original draft. AA-A: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. BW: Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was partially funded by the project “Unidad de Patología Veterinaria—FundaUNA 054502-0500” from the National University of Costa Rica and the Joint Pathology Center.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the students Maria del Mar Arce and Marcela Apuy for helping with the IHC staining. The authors also thank Dr. Sierra Imanse for comments on this case’s diagnosis and Paul Rodi for comments on the final draft.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1.
PesaventoPAAgnewDKeelMKWoolardKD. Cancer in wildlife: patterns of emergence. Nat Rev Cancer. (2018) 18:646–61. doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0045-0
2.
McAlooseDNewtonAL. Wildlife cancer: a conservation perspective. Nat Rev Cancer. (2009) 9:517–26. doi: 10.1038/nrc2665
3.
PavioloACrawshawPCasoAde OliveiraTLopez-GonzalezCAKellyMet al. Leopardus pardalis (errata version published in 2016) In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015 (2015) Available at: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/11509/97212355
4.
Sistema Nacional de Áreas de Conservación. R-SINAC-CONAC-092-2017. (2017). Lista Oficial de Especies en peligro de extinción y con poblaciones reducidas y amenazadas. Available at: https://www.pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/Normas/nrm_texto_completo.aspx?param1=NRTC&nValor1=1&nValor2=84908&nValor3=109703&strTipM=TC
5.
Di BitettiMSPavioloADe AngeloCDDi BlancoYE. Local and continental correlates of the abundance of a neotropical cat, the ocelot (Leopardus pardalis). J Trop Ecol. (2008) 24:189–200. doi: 10.1017/S0266467408004847
6.
Salom-PérezRWultschCAdamsJRSoto-FournierSGutiérrez-EspeletaGAWaitsLP. Genetic diversity and population structure for ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) in Costa Rica. J Mammal. (2022) 103:68–81. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyab146
7.
OwstonMARamsayECRotsteinDS. Neoplasia in felids at the Knoxville Zoological Gardens, 1979–2003. J Zoo Wildl Med. (2008) 39:608–13. doi: 10.1638/2008-068.1
8.
ZambelliAB. Feline cancer prevalence in South Africa (1998–2005): contrasts with the rest of the world. J Basic Appl Sci. (2015) 11:370–80. doi: 10.6000/1927-5129.2015.11.53
9.
MorescoAMuñozKEGutiérrezFArias-BernalLYarto-JaramilloETeixeiraRHFet al. Taxonomic distribution of neoplasia among non-domestic felid species under managed care. Animals. (2020) 10:2376. doi: 10.3390/ani10122376
10.
EustaceRRubinJThompsonKASnowdonKSikarskieJGMonahanCet al. Diagnosis and treatment of a unilateral renal cystadenoma in an African lion (Panthera leo). J Zoo Wildl Med. (2017) 48:906–9. doi: 10.1638/2016-0242.1
11.
d’AquinoIPiegariGCasciaroSMPriscoFRosatoGSilvestrePet al. An overview of neoplasia in captive wild felids in southern Italy zoos. Front Vet Sci. (2022) 9:9. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.899481
12.
EkerRMossigeJ. A dominant gene for renal adenomas in the rat. Nature. (1961) 189:858–9. doi: 10.1038/189858b0
13.
JonesSRCaseyHW. Primary renal tumors in nonhuman primates. Vet Pathol. (1981) 18:89–104. doi: 10.1177/0300985881018s0610
14.
Simova-CurdSNitzlDMayerJHattJ. Clinical approach to renal neoplasia in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). J Small Anim Pract. (2006) 47:504–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2006.00146.x
15.
ArenalesAFrankFAde OliveiraARde PaulaNFde OliveiraLBSCoelhoCMet al. Papillary renal adenoma in a toco toucan (Ramphastos toco). Braz J Vet Pathol. (2018) 11:113–5. doi: 10.24070/bjvp.1983-0246.v11i3p113-115
16.
LePageVDuttonCJKummrowMMcLellandDJYoungKLumsdenJS. Neoplasia of captive yellow sea horses (Hippocampus kuda) and weedy sea dragons (Phyllopteryx taeniolatus). J Zoo Wildl Med. (2012) 43:50–8. doi: 10.1638/2010-0236.1
17.
GumpenbergerMHochwartnerOLoupalG. Diagnostic imaging of a renal adenoma in a red Oscar (Astronotus ocellatus Cuvier, 1829). Vet Radiol Ultrasound. (2004) 45:139–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2004.04023.x
18.
LombardiniEDHardGCHarshbargerJC. Neoplasms of the urinary tract in fish. Vet Pathol. (2014) 51:1000–12. doi: 10.1177/0300985813511122
19.
MatsumotoIChambersJKNibeKKinoshitaRNishimuraRNakayamaHet al. Histopathologic and immunohistochemistry findings in feline renal cell carcinoma. Vet Pathol. (2018) 55:663–72. doi: 10.1177/0300985818776055
20.
PeatTJEdmondsonEFMillerMADuSoldDMRamos-VaraJA. Pax8, Napsin A, and CD10 as immunohistochemical markers of canine renal cell carcinoma. Vet Pathol. (2017) 54:588–94. doi: 10.1177/0300985817698211
21.
PeterssonFVaněčekTMichalMMartignoniGBrunelliMHalbhuberZet al. A distinctive translocation carcinoma of the kidney; “rosette forming,” t(6;11), HMB45-positive renal tumor: a histomorphologic, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and molecular genetic study of 4 cases. Hum Pathol. (2012) 43:726–36. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.07.001
22.
KloftHMRamsayECSulaMM. Neoplasia in captive Panthera species. J Comp Pathol. (2019) 166:35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2018.10.178
23.
SagartzJWGarnerFMSauerRM. Multiple neoplasia in a captive jungle cat (Felis chaus)—thyroid adenocarcinoma, gastric adenocarcinoma, renal adenoma, and sertoli cell tumor. J Wildl Dis. (1972) 8:375–80. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-8.4.375
24.
NewkirkKMNewmanSJWhiteLARohrbachBWRamsayEC. Renal lesions of nondomestic felids. Vet Pathol. (2011) 48:698–705. doi: 10.1177/0300985810382089
25.
OliveiraARPereiraFSantosDOCarvalhoTPSoares-NetoLLSantosRL. Pulmonary adenocarcinoma in a captive ocelot (Leopardus pardalis): morphologic and immunophenotypic characterization-case report. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. (2021) 73:1111–6. doi: 10.1590/1678-4162-12324
26.
NakagakiKYRLimaPAUtiumiKUPiresMAMZanattaRBoabaidFMet al. Transitional cell carcinoma of urinary bladder with metastasis in lumbar vertebrae and spinal cord compression in an ocelot (Leopardus pardalis). Pesq Vet Bras. (2015) 35:75–9. doi: 10.1590/S0100-736X2015000100015
27.
MeutenDJ. Tumors in domestic animals.Iowa, USA: John Wiley & Sons (2020).
28.
KangSCParkDSHwangEKWooGHKimJH. Renal adenoma with hydronephrosis in a cat. J Vet Clin. (2011) 28:332–5.
29.
JohnsonRLLenzSD. Hypertrophic osteopathy associated with a renal adenoma in a cat. J Vet Diagn Invest. (2011) 23:171–5. doi: 10.1177/104063871102300134
30.
ConteducaVSansonnoDRussiSDammaccoF. Precancerous colorectal lesions. Int J Oncol. (2013) 43:973–84. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2013.2041
31.
SaleebRMFaragMDingQDownesMBjarnasonGBrimoFet al. Integrated molecular analysis of papillary renal cell carcinoma and precursor lesions unfolds evolutionary process from kidney progenitor-like cells. Am J Pathol. (2019) 189:2046–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.07.002
32.
KlosePWeiseCBondzioAMulthaupGEinspanierRGruberADet al. Is there a malignant progression associated with a linear change in protein expression levels from normal canine mammary gland to metastatic mammary tumors?J Proteome Res. (2011) 10:4405–15. doi: 10.1021/pr200112q
33.
SorenmoKUKristiansenVMCofoneMAShoferFSBreenALangelandMet al. Canine mammary gland tumours; a histological continuum from benign to malignant; clinical and histopathological evidence. Vet Comp Oncol. (2009) 7:162–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5829.2009.00184.x
34.
DvanajscakZCosseyLNLarsenCP. A practical approach to the pathology of renal intratubular casts In: Seminars in diagnosstic pathology.Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier (2020). 127–34.
35.
LaFaversKAMicanovicRSaboARMaghakLAEl-AchkarTM. Evolving concepts in uromodulin biology, physiology, and its role in disease: a tale of two forms. Hypertension. (2022) 79:2409–18. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.18567
36.
Gil da CostaRMOliveiraJPSaraivaALSeixasFFariaFGärtnerFet al. Immunohistochemical characterization of 13 canine renal cell carcinomas. Vet Pathol. (2011) 48:427–32. doi: 10.1177/0300985810381909
37.
Ramos-VaraJAEdmondsonEFMillerMADusoldDM. Immunohistochemical profile of 20 feline renal cell carcinomas. J Comp Pathol. (2017) 157:115–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2017.06.004
38.
YaoJXChenXZhuYJWangHHuXYGuoJM. Prognostic value of vimentin is associated with immunosuppression in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Front Oncol. (2020) 10:1181. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01181
39.
KinneySNEbleJNHesOWilliamsonSRGrignonDJWangMet al. Metanephric adenoma: the utility of immunohistochemical and cytogenetic analyses in differential diagnosis, including solid variant papillary renal cell carcinoma and epithelial-predominant nephroblastoma. Mod Pathol. (2015) 28:1236–48. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.81
40.
TachaDChengLZhouDHenshall-PowellRL. Expression of PAX8 in normal and neoplastic tissues a comprehensive immunohistochemical study. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. (2011) 19:293–9. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0b013e3182025f66
41.
Ramos-VaraJAFrankCBDuSoldDMillerMA. Immunohistochemical detection of Pax8 and Napsin A in canine thyroid tumours: comparison with thyroglobulin, calcitonin and thyroid transcription factor 1. J Comp Pathol. (2016) 155:286–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2016.07.009
42.
TongGXWeedenEMHamele-BenaDHuanYUngerPMemeoLet al. Expression of PAX8 in nephrogenic adenoma and clear cell adenocarcinoma of the lower urinary tract: evidence of related histogenesis?Am J Surg Pathol. (2008) 32:1380–7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31816b1020
43.
MarcosRMarrinhasCMalhãoFCanadasASantosMCaniattiM. The cell tube block technique and an immunohistochemistry panel including Wilms tumor 1 to assist in diagnosing cavitary effusions in dogs and cats. Vet Clin Pathol. (2019) 48:50–60. doi: 10.1111/vcp.12709
Summary
Keywords
wildlife, neoplasia, renal, ocelot, adenoma
Citation
Romero-Vega LM, Medlin S, Hagnauer I, Alfaro-Alarcón A and Williams B (2024) Case report: Renal adenoma in a captive ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) in Costa Rica. Front. Vet. Sci. 11:1393039. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1393039
Received
28 February 2024
Accepted
08 April 2024
Published
02 May 2024
Volume
11 - 2024
Edited by
Alejandro Suarez-Bonnet, Royal Veterinary College (RVC), United Kingdom
Reviewed by
Bernat Marti Garcia, Royal Veterinary College (RVC), United Kingdom
Dylan Yaffy, Royal Veterinary College (RVC), United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Romero-Vega, Medlin, Hagnauer, Alfaro-Alarcón and Williams.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: L. Mario Romero-Vega, luis.romero.vega@una.cr
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.