REVIEW article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Animal Behavior and Welfare
Minds Over Matter: Addressing the Negative Impacts of the International Commercial Wildlife Trade on Animal Well-Being
- HL
Helen Lambert 1
- AE
Angie Elwin 2
- DA
Délagnon Assou 3
- MA
Mark Auliya 4
- LA
Lauren A Harrington 5
- AC
Alice C Hughes 6
- AM
Aniruddha Mookerjee 7
- TM
Tom Moorhouse 8
- GA
Gohar A Petrossian 9
- ES
Evan Sun 2
- CW
Clifford Warwick 10
- OE
Ozgun Emre Can 11
- ND
Neil D'Cruze 2,12
1. Animal Welfare Consultancy, Kingsteignton, United Kingdom
2. World Animal Protection, London, United Kingdom
3. Universite de Lome, Lomé, Togo
4. Leibniz-Institut zur Analyse des Biodiversitatswandels, Bonn, Germany
5. University of Oxford Department of Biology, Oxford, United Kingdom
6. The University of Hong Kong School of Biological Sciences, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR China
7. plot 11/4 village baherakhar, PO Nikkum (Malajkhand), district Balaghat 481116, India, Madhya Pradesh, India
8. oxford wildlife research, 64 Charles Street, Oxford, OX43AS, Oxford, United Kingdom
9. John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, United States
10. emergent disease foundation, 71-75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London, United Kingdom
11. Ankara Universitesi, Ankara, Türkiye
12. University of Oxford Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Tubney, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
The scale of global commercial trade in wild animals is extensive and expanding. While research has largely focused on conservation impacts, the welfare of animals involved in trade has been largely ignored, despite the large numbers of sentient animals affected. Here, we evaluate three animal species' experiences during their commercial wildlife trade journey, focusing specifically on welfare impacts: bears used in traditional medicine, dolphins for entertainment, and mink farmed for fur production for the fashion industry. These cases represent diverse geographic contexts, end uses, and stages within the trade system, highlighting the range of experiences endured by wild animals. Using the Five Domains model, we assess the duration and scale of welfare impacts. Across all three case studies, individuals experience restrictions on natural behaviours, compromised health and nutrition, exposure to chronic stressors, and long-lasting psychological effects. Our review reveals that commercial trade in wild animals involves numbers that range from thousands to several million individuals, with welfare outcomes spanning acute to chronic stress and pain, sometimes persisting for the duration of an animal's life. Given the increasing scientific evidence of animal sentience, we argue that the welfare impacts associated with commercial wildlife trade warrant urgent attention. We suggest that a new approach is required - one that moves beyond a narrow focus on species numbers and population-level impacts to also consider the lived experiences of individual animals. Effective strategies should prioritise reducing and replacing consumptive wildlife practices and mitigating the trade's negative impacts on animal welfare.
Summary
Keywords
3Rs, Animal sentience, Animal Welfare, Bears, Dolphins, Five Domains model, Mink (Neovision vision), wildlife trade
Received
08 May 2026
Accepted
04 September 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Lambert, Elwin, Assou, Auliya, Harrington, Hughes, Mookerjee, Moorhouse, Petrossian, Sun, Warwick, Can and D'Cruze. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Helen Lambert
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.