https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-science RSS Feed for Frontiers in Veterinary Science | New and Recent Articles en-us Frontiers Feed Generator,version:1 2026-05-12T01:19:58.544+00:00 60 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1848905 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1848905 2026-05-11T00:00:00Z Correction Heng SunBissih FredHaoyu WangJie HuangZihao WuDandan WuYishan LuJichang JianYucong Huang https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1785223 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1785223 2026-05-11T00:00:00Z Original Research Jun LiLuying WangYafang ZhouLijie FanYongliang LouXingxing XiaoShuai Gao https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1807298 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1807298 2026-05-11T00:00:00Z Original Research Maxime CambournacIsabelle Goy-ThollotCéline Pouzot-Nevoret 5 cmH2O (centimeters of water pressure), respectively. The sonographic assessment of volaemia (SAV) protocol was used to obtain the CVC:Ao ratio in the end-expiratory phase.ResultsFourteen dogs and 28 CVC:Ao ratio-CVP paired measurements were included. The CVP (in cmH2O) was estimated from the CVC:Ao ratio using the generated equation CVP = 20.9*(CVC:Ao)–19.44 (R = 0.69, p < 0.0001). The median CVC:Ao ratios differed significantly among groups at 0.91, 1.00, and 1.12 for LCVP, NCVP and HCVP, respectively (p = 0.0014). Using a CVC:Ao ratio <0.97, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting LCVP were 87.5 and 72.7%, respectively. Using a CVC:Ao ratio >1.09, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting HCVP were 66.7 and 90.9%, respectively.Clinical significanceThe CVC:Ao ratio may be used as a surrogate non-invasive marker for estimating CVP in spontaneously breathing dogs. A CVP < 0 cmH2O is likely if the CVC:Ao ratio is <0.97, and a CVP > 5 cmH2O is likely if the ratio is >1.09.]]> https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1821436 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1821436 2026-05-11T00:00:00Z Original Research Manuela GizzarelliGaetano OlivaInes BalestrinoAlexandra BeckThomas BlondelAlessia CrippaCécile CollignonValentina Foglia Manzillo https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1820849 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1820849 2026-05-11T00:00:00Z Case Report Sungryong KimYerim KimYounghoon JoKi-Jeong NaDongwoo ChangNamsoon LeeDong-Hyuk Jeong https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1817725 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1817725 2026-05-11T00:00:00Z Original Research María-Cristina González-MonteroMiguel CriadoMercedes AlonsoNuria SantosDaniel Gutiérrez-ExpósitoF. Javier GiráldezRafael Balaña-FouceSonia AndrésCarlos García-Estrada https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1811948 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1811948 2026-05-11T00:00:00Z Original Research Klára Matějka KošinováAlena ŘíhováRostislav LindaJan Cukor https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1834690 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1834690 2026-05-08T00:00:00Z Original Research Abass AbdulaiBenjamin Obukowho EmikpeRaphael Deladem Folitse 0.05). M. haemolytica and P. multocida were highly susceptible to cefotaxime (95%, 100%) and ciprofloxacin (83%, 91%), but exhibited resistance to amoxicillin and doxycycline. Staphylococcus aureus showed sensitivity to gentamicin (94%) and cefoxitin (71%), but resistance to tetracycline (63%). Pseudomonas spp. was completely susceptible to gentamicin, meropenem, and amikacin (all 100%) while resistant to tetracycline (100%) and sulfamethoxazole (75%).ConclusionMannheimia haemolytica was the most prevalent bacterial pathogen isolated from pneumonic sheep lungs in this study, suggesting its primary role in ovine pneumonia. Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas spp., Enterobacter, and Citrobacter spp are also prevalent. These bacteria are mostly effectively inhibited by antibiotics such as cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin, and gentamicin, but they are not susceptible to amoxicillin, tetracycline, and penicillin G.]]> https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1808447 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1808447 2026-05-08T00:00:00Z Original Research Kailun MaWeinire TuerhongXue LiDan WangJiangKun WangShengchao MaMenghua ZhangXixia HuangQiuming ChenLei Xu https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1804086 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1804086 2026-05-08T00:00:00Z Brief Research Report Jozef LazárJúlia ŠmigováL'ubomír ŠmigaViliam ŠnábelYaroslav SyrotaLadislav MolnárMarián ChabadaMikuláš HančinIngrid PapajováPeter Lazár https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1825253 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1825253 2026-05-08T00:00:00Z Perspective Eugene Chisela BwalyaChikwanda ChilesheRachel MwendaBruno PhiriKaluba ChibangoVictor ChishimbaKenneth ChawingaTaona SinyawaEdwin SianzindaFusya GomaNtombi B. MudendaChisoni Mumba https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1784276 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1784276 2026-05-08T00:00:00Z Original Research Mafalda Pedro Mil-HomensDaniel Beltran-AlcrudoAlberto Allepuz https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1749038 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1749038 2026-05-08T00:00:00Z Original Research Chung-Yao YinTa-Li LuJohn RushTung-Ju LeeChao-Yi Chang https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1767061 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1767061 2026-05-08T00:00:00Z Original Research Miao FuWei XuChangmin DengAnhuai YangMingyang XueXuan XiaoLijuan Xu https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1812293 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1812293 2026-05-08T00:00:00Z Original Research Hannah GareisVanessa HoerrRalf S. MuellerTeresa BöhmLaura Udraite-VovkJelena PalićYury ZablotskiBianka Schulz https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1813534 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1813534 2026-05-08T00:00:00Z Original Research Sabine ScullyJohn DonlonBernadette EarleyPaul E. SmithMichelle StaffordCatherine McAloonChristina StrubeDavid A. KennySinéad M. Waters 1 cm in diameter. The study investigated (1) associations between subclinical BRD status at weaning and liveweight patterns from birth to early gestation, and (2) the nasal and fecal microbiota associated with BRD status at weaning and again at 8 mo of age. Heifers were clinically assessed from birth to 8 mo, with TUS, nasal swabs and fecal samples collected at weaning and 8 mo. Liveweights were recorded from birth to early gestation. Microbial community composition of nasal and fecal samples from weaning and 8 mowere characterized by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Across the study period, heifers classified as healthy were heavier and had greater average daily gains than those with subclinical BRD. BRD status was associated with nasal microbiota composition at weaning and showed a tendency in fecal samples at weaning. No differences were detected at 8 mo. Dominant nasal genera included Moraxella, Pasteurella, Mannheimia and Mesomycoplasma, none of which differed by health status. Nine nasal and 24 fecal amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were associated with BRD-status, although all were low abundance taxa (relative abundance < 1.5%). Romboutsia ilealis (nasal) was consistently more abundant in healthy heifers, while Butyricioccaceae UCG-009 (fecal) was more abundant in the subclinical group at both timepoints. These findings highlight associations between subclinical BRD detected at weaning and both growth patterns and specific low abundance taxa. Further studies with larger cohorts are required to clarify these relationships and their biological relevance.]]> https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1777631 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1777631 2026-05-08T00:00:00Z Brief Research Report Emma HilbyMolly McCue https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1634224 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1634224 2026-05-08T00:00:00Z Brief Research Report Anel UmirbaevaAndrey KurenkovBolat SeisenovKanat ZhumanovKadyrbay TadziyevMirzhan MustafinIvan A. VorobjevNatasha S. Barteneva https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1768617 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1768617 2026-05-08T00:00:00Z Original Research Yu LiJiachun SongWenjun WangShang LiJixiang LiuChunlian LuHongzhan Cao https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1835614 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2026.1835614 2026-05-08T00:00:00Z Editorial Toshiro Arai