Abstract
One of the most serious problems affecting coastal aquifers is seawater intrusion. Senegal is currently facing an increased demand for freshwater resources due to population growth and economic development in coastal areas. In areas affected by saltwater contamination, chloride concentrations as high as 8880 mg/L were measured in groundwater samples taken from wells near the coastal zone, indicating deterioration in water quality. Our study aims to identify the zones of degradation of the water quality by determining the chemical composition of groundwater and the geochemical processes controlling the chemical patterns. Hydrogeochemical (Piper and Chadha diagrams, chloroalkaline indices, normalized bivariate plots) and multivariate statistical (Hierarchical cluster analyses) techniques were used. Forty-two groundwater samples were collected and analyzed for concentrations of major and some minor ions, electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), temperature, and pH. From samples we were able to establish a diagnosis of the very heterogeneous quality of the groundwater in this area. The average pH of the groundwater is 7.6 and about 80% of the groundwater samples have a TDS below 1000 mg/L. On the other hand, the EC values are very heterogeneous with very high conductivities in coastal areas. Approximately, 80% of the groundwater samples have a TDS less than 1000 mg/L and EC values are very heterogeneous. The dominant water types in the study area are Na-Cl water type (less than 10% of the samples) characteristic of the spatial evolution of groundwater salinization from west to east, mixed Ca-Mg-Cl due to fresh water/salt water contact and Ca-Mg-HCO3 water-type (nearly 56% of the samples) to the east. A hydrogeochemical zonation of the aquifer, based on the presence of different water families allows us to visualize the highly degraded (west), mixed (center) and healthy (east) zones. Chloroalkaline indices and normalized bivariate plots show that the chemistry of groundwater is controlled mainly by water-rock interaction and evaporation processes. As water-rock interaction processes, dissolution of carbonate and evaporite, weathering of silicate, ions exchange regulates major ion chemistry.
Introduction
The Sahel region is facing several years of persistent drought (Leroux, ; Gaye and Sylla, ). Such a drought limits the recharge of groundwater. Currently, several countries are experiencing a decline in the quantity and quality of coastal groundwater resources because of a combination of natural constraints (saline intrusion and climate change) and anthropological activities (overexploitation of water resources and increases in diffuse source pollution) (Yousfi et al., ; Gain et al., ; Hussain et al., ; Razack et al., ; Afsari et al., ; Wang et al., ; Wu et al., ). In Senegal, apart from regions with permanent surface water courses, the population's drinking water supply relies largely on the exploitation of groundwater. In the Mbour-Joal area located in the center-west of the country, access to water is based solely on the exploitation of groundwater collected from wells and boreholes. The reservoirs are poorly studied from a hydrogeological point of view (ARLAB, ; Sarr, ; Travi, ). In parallel, this coastal area is facing a significant increase in population (ANSD, ) due to economic opportunities (tourism as mentioned by Dehoorne and Diagne, ), fishing, and a pristine environment. The aquifer is therefore heavily used to meet the ever-increasing demand for drinking water and others uses. Thereby, the overexploitation of water resources leads to seawater intrusion that compromises groundwater quality. The region is characterized also by a low-lying estuary system, tidal wetlands, and denuded saline soils in the east and south. Thus, seawater has entered the hydrologic system and has been concentrated through evaporation processes to create saline surface water. Earlier studies predicted a massive saltwater intrusion after 26 years due to a rapid and excessive drop in groundwater levels (ARLAB, ). Travi et al. () showed that the saltwater intrusion started in the west toward Ngazobil and Mbodiene (Mudry and Travi, ). Today, residents of the western area reported that many previously used wells have been abandoned, and newer ones are becoming brackish. This area was therefore chosen for our study. Evaluating the groundwater quality in this area, understanding the origin and the extent of saline groundwater distribution in the aquifer, and understanding the mechanism and interactions between surface water and groundwater are essential to solving water quality deterioration. Based on the hydrochemistry approach, we determine the chemical composition of groundwater (Freeze and Cherry, ; Faye et al., ; Chucuya et al., ; Li et al., ; Ren et al., ; Su et al., ; Yao et al., ). This study aims to (1) describe the chemical composition of groundwater and the geochemical processes controlling the chemical patterns and (2) describe the extent of saline groundwater in the region studied.
Materials and methods
The study area
The study area is located in the middle-west of Senegal between longitudes 16°38′ to 17°00′ W and latitudes 14°09′ to 14°26′N with an estimated total area of about 880 km2 (Figure 1). Annual average precipitation and evaporation in the study area are ~600 and 1,600 mm, respectively. The climate is of tropical type, characterized by two climatic seasons, namely, a rainy season from June to October and a dry season from November to May. The annual temperature ranges from 20°C in December to 40°C in May, and the relative humidity ranges from 60 to 96%. The topography inclines from the northwest to the southeast, and the surface elevation varies from 0 m in the estuary system to more than 20 m above mean sea level inland (Figure 1). The savannah covers almost the entire region with the exception of the littoral and estuarine zones where a particular halophyte vegetation develops. Several soils exist in the study area (Maignien, ; Sarr, ): the black to gray-black clays cover depressions; dune sands, locally called “Joor,” extend well to the east, south, and extremity northwestern of the region; the saline soils, locally named “tanne”; and the black or black-gray salted soils saturated around the tributaries of the Saloum estuary.
Figure 1
The lithological sections (Sarr, ) show, at very variable levels, detrital soils with a predominance of clay and sand that constitute the layers of the Continental Terminal (Mio-Pliocene) and the Quaternary (Figure 2). The Eocene is generally characterized by marly or clayey facies enriched in limestone in the upper part (Tessier, ; Flicoteaux and et Lappartient, ). The base of Eocene consists of clayey limestone, marls and clays with quartz, flint, and phosphate (Sarr, ; Saint-Marc and Sarr, ). The Paleocene that outcrops around the town of Mbour sinks east and south-east under the Eocene formations. Paleocene is characterized by a rather great homogeneity of the calcareous and marly limestone facies, often shells (Monciardini, ). These shell limestones, slightly marly, karstified, or fissured, often sandstone, occupy the middle and upper horizon of the Paleocene. In the whole region, the base of the Paleocene is constituted by hard limestones and gray marly limestones, which can be sandstone (Tessier, ; Sarr, ). Beneath this formation lies the clays and sands of the Maastrichtian. Various shallow and deep aquifer systems are exploited in the study area. The Mio-Pliocene and Quaternary aquifer constituted by the clayey sands represents the marly limestone aquifer of the Upper Ypresian, the superficial system. In some areas (Figure 1: Ngueniene and Thiadiaye logs), the Eocene and Miocene-Quaternary layers form a single aquifer. In the Mio-Plio Quaternary aquifer, hydraulic conductivity is variable with mean values of 1.5 × 10−4 m/s and effective porosity of 20% (Geohydraulique OMS, ; Madioune et al., ). The deep system, essentially tapped by boreholes, wells, and wells-boreholes, is made up of the deep aquifer of the Paleocene and the Maastrichtian. The Paleocene water table is currently the most exploited with depletion or salinization in some sectors of the surface water tables (Tine et al., ). The hydraulic conductivities in Paleocene aquifer range from 6.6 × 10−6 to 2.0 × 10−2 m/s with a storage coefficient that varies from 1 × 10−4 to 7 × 10−2. Currently, network functioning depends on the importance of the annual rainfall. This hydrographic network is divided into two groups: the small marigots flowing toward the ocean (MBaling, Warang, Nianing, and Mbodiene) and the tributaries of the Saloum (Figure 1). The latter (Foua, Balabougou, Joal, and Ngueniene) collect all of the water from the thalwegs. The Saloum River is the main collector of the region under marine water pressure.
Figure 2
Sampling, analytical methods, and data
A total of 42 samples from 22 wells and 20 boreholes (ranging in groundwater level depth from 2 to 27 m) were collected in polyethylene bottles in September 2019. Water bottles were rinsed three times prior to sampling, while electrical conductivity (EC), pH, and total dissolved solids (TDS) were measured in the field by a multi-parameter WTW (Model: Multi 350i/SET, Germany). Alkalinity measurements were also performed using a digital titrator (HACH). Samples for major ions analysis (Cl−, NO, SO, HCO, Na+, K+, Mg2+, and Ca2+) were collected in two 30 ml polyethylene bottles after filtration through 0.45 μm nitrocellulose membranes. Samples for cations analysis were acidified with ultrapure HNO at 70%. Bottles were filled airtight with no bubbles and kept at 4°C until analyses. Chemical analyses were conducted at the Laboratory of Chrono-Environment, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comte, France, using an ion chromatographic system (ICS) for anions and an inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for cations. Ionic balance calculations in 95% of the samples were within ±10%.
Piper (
The processes controlling groundwater hydrochemistry have also been determined by binary diagrams. The base-exchange reaction was quantified by the calculation of chloroalkaline indices (CAI) (Schoeller,
Results and discussion
General hydrochemical characteristics
The analytical results of groundwater samples are presented in Table 1. The groundwater pH ranges from 7.1 to 8.2 with an average value of 7.6, indicating neutral to slightly alkaline water. The highest pH values are observed in the central-east zone in the localities of Guedj (43), Ngueniene (11), Ndiagamba (27), Pethemakh (9), and Ngohe (25). The electrical conductivity (EC) displays a large variability from 167 to 8,880 μS/cm, with an average value of 1,519 μS/cm (Table 2), showing that very heterogeneous water chemistry. High EC values (values >1,500 μS/cm) are observed in wells located in the coastal zone such as Ngazobil (15), Nianing (39), Sidibougou (40), Roff K. Seck (16), and Mbodiene (13). High EC values are also observed inland to Ngueniene (11), Balabougou (19), Ndiol Khokhane (31), Bagana Serere (35), and Ndiemane (18). These wells have shallow depths of 3 to 7.8 m and are located near the Balabougou and Ngueniene stream, suggesting an influence of saline surface water. Total dissolved solids (TDS) vary between 120 and 5,382 mg/L, with an average of 1,017 mg/L. Most of the samples (80%) have TDS values less than the allowable limit of 1,000 mg/L by WHO drinking water standards (WHO,
Table 1
| N° | Localities | T°C | pH | TDS | EC | Ca2+ | Mg2+ | K+ | Na+ | Cl− | NO | SO | HCO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Keur Balla lo | 31 | 7.7 | 545 | 910 | 43.9 | 15.7 | 7.8 | 123 | 278 | 0.2 | 25.4 | 38 |
| 2 | Samane | 30 | 7.4 | 649 | 1066 | 79.2 | 42.7 | 1.6 | 64.0 | 260 | 2.1 | 14.9 | 146 |
| 3 | Mbourok Cissé | 31 | 7.4 | 616 | 833 | 102 | 10.4 | 5.2 | 38.5 | 185 | 191 | 10.8 | 44.2 |
| 4 | Bacoumbel | 30 | 7.2 | 869 | 1156 | 67.8 | 68.7 | 2.5 | 73.3 | 115 | 15.5 | 47.7 | 435 |
| 5 | Soussane | 31 | 7.4 | 707 | 928 | 66.2 | 49.6 | 3.5 | 54.1 | 72.1 | 0.3 | 53.4 | 375 |
| 6 | Ndollor | 31 | 7.4 | 777 | 1001 | 70.9 | 48.3 | 5.8 | 69.3 | 79.7 | 10.5 | 46.6 | 411 |
| 7 | Ndiouck Fissel | 33 | 7.7 | 588 | 736 | 68.1 | 34.3 | 5.1 | 32.0 | 45.9 | 11.6 | 10.3 | 344 |
| 8 | Ndioudiouf | 30 | 7.5 | 569 | 1089 | 54.7 | 41.7 | 1.5 | 30.9 | 41.1 | 0.2 | 7.1 | 351 |
| 9 | Pethemakha | 31 | 8.0 | 777 | 999 | 51.9 | 55.8 | 2.7 | 81.9 | 92.2 | 1.9 | 47.2 | 399 |
| 10 | Mbassis | 32 | 7.7 | 900 | 1165 | 45.5 | 59.6 | 3.8 | 112 | 68.8 | 0.0 | 32.6 | 541 |
| 11 | Ngenienne | 31 | 8.0 | 1889 | 2670 | 137 | 89.7 | 9.0 | 320 | 452 | 149 | 291 | 401 |
| 12 | Ngenienne Sérère | 32 | 7.6 | 2103 | 2900 | 96.5 | 138 | 9.0 | 362 | 428 | 0.2 | 528 | 502 |
| 13 | Mbodiéne Nord | 30 | 7.7 | 1271 | 1761 | 85.9 | 91.5 | 5.0 | 163 | 266 | 0.2 | 163 | 456 |
| 14 | Ndofane | 31 | 7.5 | 718 | 881 | 102 | 12.1 | 0.3 | 71.7 | 58.0 | 17.2 | 37.0 | 375 |
| 15 | Ngazobil | 30 | 7.2 | 2887 | 4500 | 122 | 60.0 | 7.9 | 787 | 1107 | 0.9 | 246 | 512 |
| 16 | Roff_K Seck | 34 | 7.0 | 1207 | 1963 | 152 | 61.7 | 3.1 | 148 | 434 | 40.0 | 82.7 | 256 |
| 17 | Roff | 31 | 7.3 | 864 | 1246 | 124 | 43.7 | 1.0 | 64.5 | 186 | 12.9 | 51.0 | 345 |
| 18 | Ndiémane | 31 | 7.1 | 1578 | 2390 | 207 | 82.0 | 2.1 | 174 | 465 | 5.6 | 202 | 416 |
| 19 | Balabougou | 32 | 7.0 | 1324 | 2080 | 76.8 | 87.8 | 3.9 | 222 | 455 | 0.0 | 54.9 | 378 |
| 20 | Diolofira oualof | 31 | 7.4 | 689 | 878 | 66.0 | 47.7 | 1.8 | 48.3 | 68.4 | 0.4 | 21.0 | 394 |
| 21 | Diolofira Sérère | 30 | 7.6 | 868 | 1089 | 52.9 | 76.2 | 1.0 | 69.3 | 88.2 | 0.0 | 7.7 | 519 |
| 22 | Keur Yérim | 29 | 7.6 | 720 | 968 | 102 | 15.9 | 1.9 | 72.7 | 133 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 337 |
| 23 | Sesséne | 31 | 7.6 | 1264 | 2140 | 220 | 64.8 | 0.7 | 91.3 | 517 | 1.6 | 25.0 | 293 |
| 24 | Diokhar Ngolem | 29 | 7.5 | 697 | 872 | 81.4 | 44.0 | 0.7 | 36.0 | 62.9 | 18.5 | 6.8 | 405 |
| 25 | Ngohé Ndofongor | 31 | 7.8 | 479 | 565 | 48.0 | 13.0 | 1.0 | 55.1 | 27.5 | 10.8 | 18.7 | 257 |
| 26 | Ngohé Pofine | 32 | 7.7 | 516 | 625 | 69.4 | 10.1 | 0.5 | 49.2 | 47.2 | 19.8 | 29.9 | 233 |
| 27 | Ndiagamba | 30 | 8.0 | 452 | 566 | 45.7 | 24.7 | 0.3 | 35.9 | 41.6 | 14.7 | 30.9 | 204 |
| 28 | Pombane | 30 | 7.7 | 779 | 1064 | 34.9 | 62.4 | 2.5 | 96.5 | 132 | 0.3 | 55.8 | 337 |
| 29 | Foua 1 | 30 | 7.7 | 663 | 871 | 50.6 | 50.1 | 2.7 | 54.5 | 80.1 | 0.3 | 22.3 | 352 |
| 30 | Foua 2 | 30 | 8.0 | 836 | 1175 | 43.0 | 66.5 | 2.4 | 104 | 149 | 2.7 | 41.7 | 382 |
| 31 | Ndiol Khokhane | 29 | 7.5 | 1244 | 2030 | 215 | 13.9 | 1.9 | 166 | 457 | 19.4 | 67.0 | 263 |
| 32 | Boyar Niodior | 30 | 7.4 | 733 | 1258 | 116 | 29.8 | 8.4 | 66.3 | 268 | 16.2 | 21.8 | 175 |
| 33 | Ndianda Soudiane | 30 | 7.4 | 1372 | 1963 | 210 | 14.3 | 4.0 | 166 | 244 | 342 | 92.2 | 268 |
| 34 | Thiélème | 29 | 7.4 | 351 | 599 | 71.7 | 8.1 | 1.6 | 20.7 | 95.0 | 28.1 | 55.2 | 53 |
| 35 | Bagana Sérère | 31 | 7.6 | 1454 | 2720 | 222 | 20.1 | 10.7 | 266 | 788 | 36.2 | 29.8 | 66.5 |
| 36 | Fadial | 30 | 7.6 | 120 | 167 | 17.8 | 2.7 | 0.6 | 8.1 | 11.5 | 17.3 | 1.2 | 48.8 |
| 38 | Joal Caritas | 30 | 7.7 | 393 | 517 | 69.1 | 5.6 | 2.1 | 22.1 | 26.8 | 44.5 | 15.6 | 173 |
| 39 | Nianing | 30 | 7.3 | 5382 | 8880 | 562 | 168 | 1.0 | 1106 | 2626 | 432 | 433 | 9.4 |
| 40 | Sidibougou | 29 | 7.3 | 856 | 1696 | 99.0 | 12.7 | 2.8 | 196 | 499 | 5.1 | 4.3 | 18.9 |
| 41 | Gagnabougou | 29 | 7.4 | 577 | 958 | 67.0 | 10.6 | 1.5 | 93.9 | 189 | 55.1 | 13.0 | 113 |
| 42 | Aga Biaram | 30 | 7.6 | 735 | 968 | 63.7 | 49.7 | 2.0 | 64.7 | 91.6 | 0.7 | 17.9 | 404 |
| 43 | Guedj Ngo Diagne | 30 | 8.1 | 704 | 920 | 56.0 | 36.3 | 0.5 | 69.3 | 11.8 | 37.7 | 9.3 | 438 |
Analytical results of groundwater samples from Mbour-Joal area.
Table 2
| Parameters | Unit | WHO Permissible limit for drinking | Mean | Min | Max | Std dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temp | °C | 30 | 29 | 34 | 1.1 | |
| pH | 6.5–8.5 | 7.6 | 7.2 | 8.2 | 0.2 | |
| TDS | mg/l | 1000 | 1017 | 120 | 5382 | 858 |
| EC | μs/cm | 1500 | 1518 | 167 | 8880 | 1421 |
| Cl− | mg/l | 250 | 279 | 11.5 | 2626 | 436 |
| NO | mg/l | 50 | 37.2 | 0.0 | 432 | 88 |
| SO | mg/l | 250 | 70.8 | 1.2 | 527 | 113 |
| HCO | mg/l | 300 | 297 | 9.4 | 541 | 152 |
| Ca2+ | mg/l | 200 | 103 | 17.8 | 562 | 90 |
| K+ | mg/l | 30 | 3.2 | 0.3 | 10.7 | 2.7 |
| Mg2+ | mg/l | 150 | 46.2 | 2.7 | 168 | 35.4 |
| Na+ | mg/l | 200 | 142 | 8.1 | 1106 | 201 |
Descriptive statistics of the physico-chemical parameters groundwater samples.
Concentrations of HCO vary between 9.4 and 541 mg/L with a mean of 297 mg/L. The bicarbonate could originate from the same sources as Ca and Mg, i.e., carbonate precipitation and dissolution of silicate minerals (Belkhiri et al.,
The concentration of NO in the groundwater ranges from 0.0 (< LOD 0.05) to 432 mg/L with a mean of 37.2 mg/L. Nitrate is a frequent contaminant in groundwater in arid and semi-arid regions and emanates from anthropogenic activities (Adimalla et al.,
Hydrogeochemical facies and process
Piper and Chadha diagram
The Piper (
Figure 3

Piper diagram of the groundwater samples of the study area.
Figure 4

Spatial distribution of the water faces types.
Chadha diagram (Chadha,
Figure 5

Chadha's diagram of the groundwater samples.
Hierarchical cluster analyses (HCA)
Using HCA, three major clusters C1, C2, and C3 including four subclusters C1 − 1, C1 − 2, C3 − 1, and C3 − 2 are identified (Figure 6A). The C1 cluster consists of two subclusters C1 − 1 and C1 − 2 and represents 28.5% of the water samples. The C1 − 1 subcluster includes wells 15, 16, 19, 23, 31, 33, and 40, and the C1 − 2 subcluster includes wells 11, 12, 13, 18, and 35. The mean EC is 1,948 μS/cm for C1 − 1 (Ca-Cl) and 2,670 μS/cm for C1 − 2 subcluster (Na-Cl). This water type is characteristic of highly saline water.
Figure 6

Dendrogram (A) for the groundwater samples, showing the division into several clusters and Stiff diagram (B) showing the mean composition of groundwater in this cluster.
Cluster C2 includes wells 36, 34, 38, 26, 27, and 25 and accounts for 14.3% of the water samples. The mean EC for this cluster is 506 μS/cm, which is the characteristic freshwater. Groundwater in this cluster is of the Ca-HCO3 type (Figure 6B). The dissolution of carbonates could be the process responsible for this type of water encountered in the central-eastern sector where the reservoir rock is essentially composed of argillaceous limestones flint, marl, and biogenic limestones. The third cluster (C3) includes all the other samples divided into two subclusters C3 − 1 and C3 − 2 having a mean electrical conductivity of 1,000 μS/cm. The high chloride ion content in subcluster C3 − 2 (wells 1, 2, 3, 41, and 32) may be due to contamination by saline surface water in the vicinity of these wells (Figure 4). This type of water is interpreted by water–rock interactions as a result of dilution by salty surface water in contact with the carbonate formations of the aquifer. This water type is interpreted by water–rock interactions following dilution by salty surface water in contact with carbonate formations in the aquifer. The HCA gives a better precision of the distribution of facies and shows that the waters present a strong chemical heterogeneity unlike the Piper diagram, which illustrates three water types.
Correlation analysis of chemical parameters
A plot of Ca2+ vs. HCO normalized to Na (Figure 7A) (Gaillardet et al.,
Figure 7

Bivariate mixing plots of Na-normalize Ca and HCO3(A) and Na-normalized Ca and Mg (B).
Figure 8 shows plots of (Ca2+ + Mg2+) vs. (HCO + SO) (Figure 8A), Mg2+ vs. Ca2+ (Figure 8B), HCO vs. (Ca2+ + Mg2+) (Figure 8C), and EC vs. Na+/Cl– (Figure 8D). The plot of (Ca2+ + Mg2+) vs. (HCO + SO) shows that some samples fall along the aquiline 1:1 (Figure 8A), which indicates that Ca2+, Mg2+, SO, and HCO were derived from the dissolution of calcite, dolomite, and gypsum. This corroborates the different facies obtained using the Piper and Chadha diagrams. Many other water samples are below this line (Figure 8A), suggesting a substantial excess of (Ca2+ + Mg2+) over (HCO + SO). In these samples, reverse ion exchange is the process that explains the presence of Ca-Cl facies. This figure reveals an excess of SO +HCO for some locations sampled, suggesting silicate weathering (Ndoye et al.,
Figure 8

Plots of (Ca2+ + Mg2+) vs. (HCO + SO) (A), Mg2+ vs. Ca2+(B), HCO3 vs. (Ca2+ + Mg2+) (C), and EC versus Na/Cl (D).
The plot of Mg2+ vs. Ca2+ (Figure 8B) indicates an excess of Ca2+ in some samples, an excess of Mg2+ in other samples, and a balance between Mg2+ and Ca2+ in the remaining samples. The plot of (Ca2+ + Mg2+) vs. HCO (Figure 8C) shows that most of the samples are above the equiline (1:1) and only three points are below this line. Using these two plots, we can say that excess of (Ca2+ + Mg2+) over HCO is balanced by Cl- and SO (Su et al.,
Indices of base exchange
Na-Ca exchange is a significant process that can modify cation concentrations in groundwater and influence the evolution of hydrochemical compositions. When the chloroalkaline indices (CAIs) are positive, they indicate an exchange of Na+ and K+ from the water with Mg2+ and Ca2+ from the rocks (base-exchange reaction). It is reversed when CAIs are negative. The chloroalkaline index is observed for 45% of the samples, indicating the exchange of Na+ and K+ against the Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions of the aquifer rocks. The map of the distribution of chloroalkaline indices values (Figure 9) shows that negative values were observed in wells located in a central south-north band and in the north-eastern part of the study area. This observation indicates that the normal ion exchange and reverse ion exchange are geochemical processes controlling the composition of groundwater in a normal scenario. In this study, the pressure of marine waters close to the region modifies the chemical process of groundwaters.
Figure 9

Regional distribution of Chloro-Alkaline Indices in the study area.
Conclusion
Hydrogeochemical studies were carried out in the central west area of Senegal to (1) identify water quality degradation in the coastal aquifer, (2) estimate its spatial progression, and (3) assess the main geochemical processes responsible for groundwater chemistry using the Piper and Chadha diagrams, chloroalkaline indices, normalized bivariate plots, and multivariate statistical (hierarchical cluster analyses) techniques. The main conclusions are as follows:
- The values of pH indicate a neutral to slightly alkaline water. Electrical conductivity is highly variable, showing very heterogeneous water chemistry.
- The main water type in the region is the Ca-Mg-HCO3 type in the eastern sector, which gradually degrades to a mixed Ca-Mg-Cl type in the central part and then a more saline NaCl type toward the coast.
The HCA gives better precision on the distribution of facies and shows a strong chemical heterogeneity of the waters with several clusters (C1, C2, and C3) and water subclusters (C1 − 1, C1 − 2, C3 − 1, and C3 − 2). It corresponds to the progression of the saline front that modifies locally the natural interaction between rocks and freshwaters:
- Water–rock interaction is the dominant geochemical process. The silicate weathering, dissolution of carbonates and evaporate, and ion exchanges between water and minerals control the groundwater chemistry. Saline intrusion is also very evident in the area with degradation of groundwater quality.
- The information obtained from the results will be useful for the management of groundwater resources, especially with regard to saltwater intrusion and its progression. A report has been addressed to the stakeholders for preventive actions.
- For future studies, it is envisaged that isotope and dating water will be used to improve understanding of the hydrogeological behavior of the system. Geophysical surveys are underway to better delineate the aquifers in the region. This will allow us to build a quantitative hydrogeological model for the evaluation of the available groundwater resources.
Data quality control
The samples (collection, transport, storage, and preparation before analysis) were managed according to ISO 5667-1, −3, −11, −14, and −22. Major and minor ion analyses by ICP-MS were validated after three measurements/sample. The sensitivity of the ICPMS is determined weekly by fixed concentration standards. During the ICPMS analysis of the samples, blanks are done at the beginning and end of each analytical run. All samples were spiked previously before the analysis with 1 ml of a standard solution (Multielement Standard Solution 6 for ICP, ref 43843-100ML from Thermofisher, ref). All of these procedures allow for the quality assurance of the chemical measurements made in this study.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
SN conducted sampling analysis and exploitation of the data and wrote the original version. MD assisted SN on the field and data analysis. SF supervised the research. HC supervised the analysis in his laboratory and the validation of the data and also provided advertisement and modification on the original version. MB corrected the English and also modified parts of the manuscript. PL supervised the different version and made modification before the submission. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
SN is thankful to the Cooperation and Cultural Action Service of the French Embassy in Senegal for providing financial assistance for a high-level scientific stay in France. The authors further express sincere appreciation for the assistance with the chemical analyses by the staff of the Chrono-environment Laboratory at the University of Bourgogne Franche-Comte, Besancon, France.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frwa.2022.1097396/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AdimallaN.LiP.QianH. (2019). Evaluation of groundwater contamination for fluoride and nitrate in semi-arid region of Nirmal Province, South India: a special emphasis on human health risk assessment (HHRA). Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 25, 1107–1124. 10.1080/10807039.2018.1460579
2
AdimallaN.QianH.NandanM. J. (2020). Groundwater chemistry integrating the pollution index of groundwater and evaluation of potential human health risk: a case study from hard rock terrain of south India. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.206, 111217. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111217
3
AfsariN.MurshedS. B.UddinS. M. N.HasanM. (2022). Opportunities and Barriers Against Successive Implementation of Rainwater Harvesting Options to Ensure Water Security in Southwestern Coastal Region of Bangladesh. Front. Water4, 811918. 10.3389/frwa.2022.811918
4
ANSD (2013). Recensement Général de la Population et de l'Habitat, de l'Agriculture et de l'Elevage. Rapport définitif 2013, Ministère de l'Economie, des Finances et du Plan du Sénégal.
5
ARLAB (1982). Alimentation en eau des Industries Chimiques Sénégalaises. Etude complémentaire du “Maestrichtien”. Rapport final no 183/3, Dir. Et. Hydr. Dakar103p.
6
AsmaelN. M.HuneauF.GarelE.Celle-JeantonH.Le CoustumerP.DupuyA.et al. (2015). Origin and recharge mechanisms of groundwater in the upper part of the Awaj River (Syria) based on hydrochemistry and environmental isotope techniques. Arab. J. Geosci. Saudi Soc. Geosci.8, 10521–10542. 10.1007/s12517-015-1953-x
7
BelkhiriL.BoudoukhaA.MouniL.BaouzT. (2010). Application of multivariate statistical methods and inverse geochemical modeling for characterization of groundwater- a case study: Ain Azel plain (Algeria). Gepoderma159, 390–398. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.08.016
8
BelkhiriL.MouniL.BoudoukhaA. (2012). Evolution of groundwater in an alluvial aquifer: Case of El Eulma aquifer, East Algeria. J. Afr. Earth Sci.66–67, 46–55. 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2012.03.001
9
BrahmanK. D.KaziT. G.AfridiH. I.NaseemS.ArainS. S.UllahN. (2013). Evaluation of high levels of fluoride, arsenic species and other physicochemical parameters in underground water of two sub districts of Tharparkar, Pakistan: a multivariate study. Water Res.47, 1005–102010.1016/j.watres.2012.10.042
10
BrownC. (1998). Applied Multivariate Statistics in Geohydrology and Related Sciences. Springer Science and Business Media. 10.1007/978-3-642-80328-4
11
ChadhaD. K. (1999). A proposed new diagram for geochemical classification of natural waters and interpretation of chemical data. Hydrogeol. J.7, 431–43910.1007/s100400050216
12
ChebbahM.AlliaZ. (2015). Geochemistry and hydrogeochemical process of groundwater in the soouf valley of low Septentrional Sahar, Algeria. Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.9, 261–273. 10.5897/AJEST2014.1710
13
ChucuyaS.VeraA.Pino-VargasE.SteenkenA.MahlknechtJ.MontalvánI. (2022). Hydrogeochemical characterization and identification of factors influencing groundwater quality in coastal aquifers, case: La Yarada, Tacna, Peru. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health19, 2815. 10.3390/ijerph19052815
14
CloutierV.LefebvreR.TherrienR.SavardM. M. (2008). Multivariate statistical analysis of geochemical data as indicative of the hydrogeochemical evolution of groundwater in a sedimentary rock aquifer system. J. Hydrol. 353, 294–313. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.02.015
15
DattaP. S.TyagiS. K. (1996). Major ion chemistry of groundwater in Delhi area: chemical weathering processes and groundwater regime. J. Geol. Soc. India47, 179–188.
16
DehoorneO.DiagneA. K. (2008). Tourisme, développement et enjeux politiques: l'exemple de la Petite Côte (Sénégal). Études Caribéennes.2008, 9–10. 10.4000/etudescaribeennes.1172
17
FarnhamI. M.StetzenbachK. J.SinghA. K.JohannessonK. H. (2000). Deciphering groundwater flow systems in Oasis valley, Nevada, using trace element chemistry, multivariate statistics, and geographical information system. Math. Geol. 32, 943–968. 10.1023/A:1007522519268
18
FayeS.Cisse FayeS.NdoyeS.FayeA. (2003). Hydrogeochemistry of the Saloum (Senegal) superficial coastal aquifer. Environ. Geol. 44, 127–136. 10.1007/s00254-002-0749-y
19
FlicoteauxR.et LappartientJ. P. (1972). Le passage de l'Eocène inferieur à l'Eocène moyen sur la bordure orientale du dôme de NDiass (Sénégal occidental). Travaux Lab. Sci. Terre, St-Jérôme, Marseille (A), 6, 1–28.
20
FreezeR. A.CherryJ. (1979). Groundwater. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21
GaillardetJ.DupreB.LouvatP.AllegreC. J. (1999). Global silicate weathering and CO consumption rates deduced 2 from the chemistry of large rivers. Chem. Geol.159, 3–3010.1016/S0009-2541(99)00031-5
22
GainA. K.GiupponiC.RenaudF. G. (2012). Climate change adaptation and vulnerability assessment of water resources systems in developing countries: a generalized framework and a feasibility study in Bangladesh. Water4, 345–366. 10.3390/w4020345
23
GayeA. T.SyllaM. B. (2018). Scenarios climatiques au Sénégal. Laboratoire de Physique de l'atmosphère et de l'océan S F (LPAO-SF). Rapport, Ecole Supérieure Polytechnique Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Sénégal.
24
Geohydraulique and OMS (1972). Approvisionnement en eau et assainissements de Dakar et ses environs. Etude des eaux souterraines. Projet Sénégal 3201 (EX 22), Tome II et III.
25
GrandeJ. A.BorregoJ.TorreM. L. D.SainzA. (2003). Application of cluster analysis to the geochemistry zonation of the estuary waters in the Tinto and Odiel rivers (Huelva, Spain). Environ. Geochem. Health25, 233–246. 10.1023/A:1023217318890
26
GülerC.ThyneG. D. (2004). Hydrologic and geologic factors controlling surface and groundwater chemistry in Indian Wells–Owens valley area, southeastern California, USA. J. Hydrol. 285, 177–198. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.08.019
27
GülerC.ThyneG. D.McCrayJ. E.TurnerA. K. (2002). Evaluation of graphical and multivariate statistical methods for classification of water chemistry data. Hydrogeology10, 455–474. 10.1007/s10040-002-0196-6
28
HelstrupT.JorgensenN. O.Banoeng-YakuboB. (2007). Investigation of hydrochemical characteristics of groundwater from Cretaceous–Eocene limestone aquifers in southern Ghana and Togo using hierarchical cluster analysis. Hydrogeol. J.15, 977–989. 10.1007/s10040-007-0165-1
29
HemJ. D. (1992). Study and Interpretation of Chemical Characteristics of Natural Water, 3rd Edn. USGS Water-Supply Paper, 2254.
30
HussainM. S.AbdelhamidH. F.JavadiA. A.MohsenM. S. (2019). Management of seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers: a review. Water11, 2467. 10.3390/w11122467
31
HusseinM. T. (2004). Hydrochemical evaluation of groundwater in the Blue Nile Basin, eastern Sudan, using conventional and multivariate techniques. Hydrogeol. J. 12, 144–158. 10.1007/s10040-003-0265-5
32
HussienB. M.FaiyadA. S. (2016). Modeling the hydrogeochemical processes and source of ions in the groundwater of aquifers within Kasra-Nukhaib Region (West Iraq). Int. J. Geosci.7, 1156–1181. 10.4236/ijg.2016.710087
33
KaurL.RishiM. S.SharmaS. (2019). Hydrogeochemical characterization of groundwater in alluvial plains of river Yamuna in northern India: an insight of controlling processes. J. King Saud Univ. Sci.31, 1245–1253. 10.1016/j.jksus.2019.01.005
34
LerouxM. (1995). La dynamique de la grande sécheresse sahélienne / Dynamics of the Great Sahelian Drought. Rev. Géogr. Lyon70, 223–232. 10.3406/geoca.1995.4216
35
LiC.MenB. H.YinS. Y. (2022). Analysis of groundwater chemical characteristics and spatiotemporal evolution trends of influencing factors in southern Beijing Plain. Front. Environ. Sci. 10, 913542. 10.3389/fenvs.2022.913542
36
LiangZ.ChenJ.JiangT.KunL.GaoL.WangZ.et al. (2018). Identification of the dominant hydrogeochemical processes and characterization of potential contaminants in groundwater in Qingyuan, China, by multivariate statistical analysis. RSC Adv. 8, 33243. 10.1039/C8RA06051G
37
MadiouneD. H.FayeS.OrbanP.BrouyèreS.DassarguesA.MudryJ.et al. (2014). Application of isotopic tracers as a tool for understanding hydrodynamic behavior of the highly exploited Diass aquifer system (Senegal). J. Hydrol.511443–459. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.01.037
38
MaghaA.AwahM.NonoG.TamfuhP.WotchokoP.AdohM.et al. (2021). Assessment of groundwater quality for domestic and irrigation purposes in northern Bamenda (Cameroon). J. Water Resour. Prot.13, 1–19. 10.4236/jwarp.2021.131001
39
MaignienR. (1965). Carte pédologique du Sénégal au 1/1000000. Notice Explicative. ORSTOM Dakar.
40
MarghadeD. (2020). Detailed geochemical assessment and indexing of shallow groundwater resources in metropolitan city of Nagpur (western Maharashtra, India) with potential health risk assessment of nitrate enriched groundwater for sustainable development (2020) Chemie der Erde. Geochemistry80, 125627. 10.1016/j.chemer.2020.125627
41
MelloulA.CollinM. (1992). The ‘principal components' statistical method as a complementary approach to geochemical methods in water quality factor identification; application to the Coastal Plain aquifer of Israel. J. Hydrol.140, 49–73. 10.1016/0022-1694(92)90234-M
42
MonciardiniC. (1966). La sédimentation éocène au Sénégal. Mem. Bur. Rech. Geol. Min. Orleans43, 65.
43
MontcoudiolN.MolsonJ.LemieuxJ.-M. (2014). Groundwater geochemistry of the Outaouais Region (Québec, Canada): a regional-scale study. Hydrogeol. J. 23, 377–396. 10.1007/s10040-014-1190-5
44
MudryJ.TraviY. (1995). “Enregistreurs et indicateurs de l'évolution de l'environnement en zone tropicale,” in Sécheresse Sahélienne et Action Anthropique - Deux Facteurs Conjugués de Dégradation des Ressources en eau de l'Afrique de l'Ouest - Exemple du Sénégal, P., eds R. Maire, S. Pomel, and J.-N. Salomon (Univ. Bordeaux), 219–234. 10.4000/books.pub.10172
45
MufurA. M.AwahM. T.TamfuhP. A.AgendiaM. A.NgambuA. A.KabeyeneV. K. (2021). Groundwater resources for domestic and irrigation purposes in Melong (Littoral Region, Cameroon): hydrogeochemical constraints. Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 15, 270–281. 10.5897/AJEST2021.3027
46
NdoyeS.FontaineC.GayeC. B.RazackM. (2018). Groundwater quality and suitability for different uses in the saloum area of Senegal. Water10, 1837. 10.3390/w10121837
47
PaulR.BrindhaK.GowrisankarG.TanM. L.SinghM. K. (2019). Identification of hydrogeochemical processes controlling groundwater quality in Tripura, Northeast India using evaluation indices, GIS, and multivariate statistical methods. Environ. Earth Sci. 78, 470. 10.1007/s12665-019-8479-6
48
Perez VillarrealJ.Avila OliveraJ. A.Israde AlcantaraI.Buenrostro DelgadoO. (2019). Nitrate as a parameter for differentiating groundwater flow systems in urban and agricultural areas: the case of Morelia-Capula area, Mexico. Hydrogeol. J.27, 1767–1778. 10.1007/s10040-019-01933-0
49
PiperA. M. (1944). A graphic procedure in the chemical interpretation of water analysis. Am. Geophys. Union Trans. 25, 914–923. 10.1029/TR025i006p00914
50
RazaM.FarooqiA.NiaziN. K.AhmadA. (2016). Geochemical control on spatial variability of fluoride concentrations in groundwater from rural areas of Gujrat in Punjab, Pakistan. Environ. Earth Sci.75, 1364. 10.1007/s12665-016-6155-7
51
RazackM.JalludinM.GabaA. H. (2019). Simulation of climate change impact on a coastal aquifer under arid climate. The Tadjourah Aquifer (Republic of Djibouti, Horn of Africa). Water11, 2347. 10.3390/w11112347
52
RenX.YuR.KangJ.LiX.WangR.ZhuangS.et al. (2022). Hydrochemical evaluation of water quality and its influencing factors in a closed inland lake basin of Northern China. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10, 1005289. 10.3389/fevo.2022.1005289
53
SahaN.Safiur RahmanM. (2020). Groundwater hydrogeochemistry and probabilistic health risk assessment through exposure to arsenic-contaminated groundwater of Meghna floodplain, central-east Bangladesh. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.206, 111349. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111349
54
Saint-MarcP.SarrR. (1984). Précisions biostratigraphiques et paléo environnementales sur le sommet du Paléocène et la base de l'Eocène de la région de Mbour-Joal (Sénégal). Jour. Afric. Earth Sci.2, 203–207. 10.1016/S0731-7247(84)80015-4
55
SarrR. (1982). Etude géologique et hydrogéologique de la région de Joal-Fadiouth (Sénégal). Thèse 3ème cycle, Univ. Dakar (1982), 166.
56
SarrR. (1999). Le Paléogène de la région de Mbour-Joal (Sénégal occidental) : biostratigraphie, étude systématique des ostracodes, paléoenvironnement. Rev. Paléobiol. Genève18, 1–29.
57
SchoellerH. (1934). Les échanges de base dans les eaux souterraines; trois exemples en Tunisie. Bull. Soc. Geol. Fr. 4, 389–420.
58
SchoellerH. (1967). Geochemistry of Groundwater-an International Guide for Research and Practice, Chap. 15. UNESCO, 1–18.
59
SimlerR. (2009). Diagrammes.Avignon, France: Laboratoire d'Hydrogéologie d'Avignon.
60
StatSoft Inc. (2004). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7. Available online at: https://www.statistica.com/en/ (accessed January 14, 2023).
61
SuC.LiuY.ChengZ.WangW.ZhengZ. (2022), Hydrochemical process controls on the hydrochemistry of river water in the Muling-Xingkai Plain, Northeast China. Front. Environ. Sci. 10, 1010367. 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1010367
62
SuY.ZhuG.FengQ.LiZ.ZhangF. (2009). Environmental isotopic and hydrochemical study of groundwater in the Ejina Basin, northwest China. Environ. Geol.58, 601–614. 10.1007/s00254-008-1534-3
63
SubramaniT.RajmohanN.ElangoL. (2009). Groundwater geochemistry and identification of hydrogeochemical processes in a hard rock region, Southern India. Environ. Monit. Assess.34, 35–37. 10.1007/s10661-009-0781-4
64
TessierF. (1954). Contribution à la stratigraphie et à la paléontologie de la partie ouest du Sénégal (Crétacé et Tertiaire). Bull. Dir. Mines Afr. Occid.14, 570.
65
TineA. K.BaM. I.Gladima–SibyA. S.EssouliO. F.FayeA.SarrB. (2011). Actualization of the Maastrichtian and Paleocene aquifers hydrogeological situation of the region of Mbour, Senegal. J. Sci. Technol.9, 23–32.
66
TraviY. (1988). Hydrogéochimie et hydrogéologie des aquifères fluorés du bassin du Sénégal. Origine et conditions de transport du fluor dans les eaux souterraines. Thèse Sciences. Univ. de Paris Sud (Orsay), 190.
67
TraviY.SarrR.FayeA.GayeC.-B. (1983). Etude chimique de l'évolution du front salé de la nappe paléocène de la région de Mbour. Rapport Inédit. 3A-82-4713, 1–25.
68
WangH. X.JiangW.WanL.GuilinH.an, Guo, H. (2015). Hydrogeochemical characterization of groundwater flow systems in the discharge area of a river basin. J. Hydrol.527, 433–441. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.063
69
WangP.YuJ.ZhangY.LiuC. (2013). Groundwater recharge and hydrogeochemical evolution in the Ejina Basin, northwest China. J. Hydrol.476, 72–86. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.049
70
WangX.GengX.Sadat-NooriM.ZhangY. (2022). Groundwater-Seawater Exchange and Environmental Impacts. Front. Water4, 928615. 10.3389/frwa.2022.928615
71
WHO (2011). Guideline for Drinking-Water Quality, 4th Edn.Geneva, SwitzerlandL World Health Organization.
72
WinterT. C.HarveW. J.FrankeO. L.AlleyW. M. (1998). Ground Water and Surface Water: A Single Resource. Denver, Colorado: US Geological Survey Circular, 1139, 87 p. Available online at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/circ1139/index.html (accessed January 14, 2023).
73
WuC. L. R.StigterT. Y.CraigS. G. (2022). Assessing the quantity and quality controls of the freshwater lens on a semi-arid coral-limestone Island in Sri Lanka. Front. Water4, 832227. 10.3389/frwa.2022.832227
74
YaoR.YanY.WeiC.LuoM.XiaoY.ZhangY. (2022). Hydrochemical characteristics and groundwater quality assessment using an integrated approach of the PCA, SOM, and Fuzzy c-means clustering: a case study in the northern Sichuan Basin. Front. Environ. Sci. 10, 907872. 10.3389/fenvs.2022.907872
75
YidanaS. M.OphoriD.Banoeng-YakuboB. (2008). Hydrogeological and hydrochemical characterization of the Voltaian Basin: the Afram Plains area, Ghana. Environ. Geol. 53, 1213–1223. 10.1007/s00254-007-0710-1
76
YousfiY.ElH.imi, M.OuarghiH.ElElgettafi, M.BenyoussefS.GueddariH.et al. (2002). Hydrogeochemical and statistical approach to characterize groundwater salinity in the Ghiss-Nekkor coastal aquifers in the Al Hoceima province, Morocco. Groundwater Sust. Dev.19, 100818. 10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100818
77
ZhouY.LiP.XueL.DongZ.LiD. (2020). Solute geochemistry and groundwater quality for drinking and irrigation purposes: a case study in Xinle city. Geochemistry80, 125609. 10.1016/j.chemer.2020.125609
Summary
Keywords
groundwater, geochemistry, hydrochemical processes, coastal aquifer, Senegal
Citation
Ndoye S, Diedhiou M, Celle H, Faye S, Baalousha M and Le Coustumer P (2023) Hydrogeochemical characterization of groundwater in a coastal area, central western Senegal. Front. Water 4:1097396. doi: 10.3389/frwa.2022.1097396
Received
13 November 2022
Accepted
30 December 2022
Published
26 January 2023
Volume
4 - 2022
Edited by
Gopal Krishan, National Institute of Hydrology (Roorkee), India
Reviewed by
Guanxing Huang, Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, China; Saranga Diyabalanage, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Sri Lanka
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2023 Ndoye, Diedhiou, Celle, Faye, Baalousha and Le Coustumer.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Philippe Le Coustumer ✉ seyni.ndoye@ucad.edu.sn
This article was submitted to Environmental Water Quality, a section of the journal Frontiers in Water
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.