It is evident that excessive CO2 emissions have harmful environmental effects including ocean acidification, rising global temperature, severe weather and climate effects, and more. Although reducing carbon emissions by using renewable energy is vital for reducing these negative effects, the current concentration levels of atmospheric CO2 is already beyond acceptable. Realistically, there is an urgent and inevitable need for negative CO2 emissions. While nature plays its role to reduce CO2 concentration through processes such as photosynthesis and rock weathering, obstacles such as land availability and the slow pace of these processes would be a major hurdle. Recently, researchers have been exploring various options for direct capture of CO2 from the air as a viable approach to this problem. Capturing CO2 from the air, also known as Direct Air Capture (DAC), has gained growing interest as a method for reversing climate change.
While direct air capture (DAC) seems to be a promising method for negative CO2 emissions, it is still taking its early steps. Unlike many processes in the chemical industry. DAC is a newly developed process on an industrial scale and, therefore, there are still many hurdles to overcome. One of the major concerns associated with this process is its high cost. Techno-economic analyses based on various data sources have shown that the main sources of cost for DAC processes depend on the details of each process. The high cost of CO2 sorbents, high CO2 desorption energy, and low sorbent stability are among some of the main problems faced in this process. Therefore, reducing the cost of the process through reducing the cost of sorbents, increasing their lifetime, and reducing required adsorption/desorption energy for CO2 are among today’s main goals for DAC.
Authors are welcome to send their recent research outcomes on DAC process, including their new findings on:
- New CO2 sorbents
- Nanomaterials for the adsorption of CO2
- Metal-organic frameworks (MOF) for CO2 adsorption
- Sorbent lifetime and regeneration
- Increasing sorbent capacity for CO2 capture
They are also encouraged to send us their recent findings on:
- CO2 contactors
- DAC processes
- Proposed CO2 adsorption/desorption techniques
- Their general views on the future of DAC and main concerns to consider
- The outlook of direct CO2 removal from air
Articles in the form of original research, perspectives, and reviews are welcome.
Topic Editor Ali Bahmanpour is employed by company Emissol LLC, Topic Editor Bita Bayatsarmadi is employed by company CSIRO, and Topic Editor Fan Liang Chan is employed by company CF Technologies. As such all Topic Editors have declared their conflict of interest in any submission relating to their affiliation.
Keywords:
Direct Air Capture (DAC), CO2 capture, CO2 removal, CO2 sorbent, CO2 adsorption/desorption
Important Note:
All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.
It is evident that excessive CO2 emissions have harmful environmental effects including ocean acidification, rising global temperature, severe weather and climate effects, and more. Although reducing carbon emissions by using renewable energy is vital for reducing these negative effects, the current concentration levels of atmospheric CO2 is already beyond acceptable. Realistically, there is an urgent and inevitable need for negative CO2 emissions. While nature plays its role to reduce CO2 concentration through processes such as photosynthesis and rock weathering, obstacles such as land availability and the slow pace of these processes would be a major hurdle. Recently, researchers have been exploring various options for direct capture of CO2 from the air as a viable approach to this problem. Capturing CO2 from the air, also known as Direct Air Capture (DAC), has gained growing interest as a method for reversing climate change.
While direct air capture (DAC) seems to be a promising method for negative CO2 emissions, it is still taking its early steps. Unlike many processes in the chemical industry. DAC is a newly developed process on an industrial scale and, therefore, there are still many hurdles to overcome. One of the major concerns associated with this process is its high cost. Techno-economic analyses based on various data sources have shown that the main sources of cost for DAC processes depend on the details of each process. The high cost of CO2 sorbents, high CO2 desorption energy, and low sorbent stability are among some of the main problems faced in this process. Therefore, reducing the cost of the process through reducing the cost of sorbents, increasing their lifetime, and reducing required adsorption/desorption energy for CO2 are among today’s main goals for DAC.
Authors are welcome to send their recent research outcomes on DAC process, including their new findings on:
- New CO2 sorbents
- Nanomaterials for the adsorption of CO2
- Metal-organic frameworks (MOF) for CO2 adsorption
- Sorbent lifetime and regeneration
- Increasing sorbent capacity for CO2 capture
They are also encouraged to send us their recent findings on:
- CO2 contactors
- DAC processes
- Proposed CO2 adsorption/desorption techniques
- Their general views on the future of DAC and main concerns to consider
- The outlook of direct CO2 removal from air
Articles in the form of original research, perspectives, and reviews are welcome.
Topic Editor Ali Bahmanpour is employed by company Emissol LLC, Topic Editor Bita Bayatsarmadi is employed by company CSIRO, and Topic Editor Fan Liang Chan is employed by company CF Technologies. As such all Topic Editors have declared their conflict of interest in any submission relating to their affiliation.
Keywords:
Direct Air Capture (DAC), CO2 capture, CO2 removal, CO2 sorbent, CO2 adsorption/desorption
Important Note:
All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.