Skip to main content

About this Research Topic

Manuscript Summary Submission Deadline 21 March 2024
Manuscript Submission Deadline 09 July 2024

Across the world, urology practice has continued to evolve. Some of these changes have led to increasing levels of provider burnout and decreasing job satisfaction. Reasons for these shifts are myriad and at least partly due to: 1) increasing regulatory and administrative burdens which generate meaningless work, 2) electronic medical record systems with poor usability, 3) loss of autonomy in practice, and 4) workforce shortages. In addition, urology providers often find themselves peforming low-level tasks in addition to high level clinical activity. While professional societies and policymakers work toward systemic change, clinical urologists can modify their clinic workflows to improve day-to-day practice. Addressing these challenges requires intentionality, creative problem solving, and strategy-sharing.

The scope of this research topic is broad and includes any system, technology, quality improvement and/or process improvement strategy that improves physician efficiency within a urology practice. The goals of improving clinical efficiency are both patient-centered and physician-centered. A more efficient practice can increase patient throughput and thereby improve patient access to urologic care. In addition, these changes allow the urologist to focus on urology and can help struggling clinicians recapture the joy in work.

The following themes will be explored:
- Clinic workflows and resource utilization
- Team-based care and effective delegation
- Time and task management strategies
- Process improvement for clinic efficiency
- Harnessing the electronic medical record
- Leveraging current technologies and telehealth
- Emerging technologies and future directions

Keywords: Urology, clinic efficiency, urologic care, patient care


Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Across the world, urology practice has continued to evolve. Some of these changes have led to increasing levels of provider burnout and decreasing job satisfaction. Reasons for these shifts are myriad and at least partly due to: 1) increasing regulatory and administrative burdens which generate meaningless work, 2) electronic medical record systems with poor usability, 3) loss of autonomy in practice, and 4) workforce shortages. In addition, urology providers often find themselves peforming low-level tasks in addition to high level clinical activity. While professional societies and policymakers work toward systemic change, clinical urologists can modify their clinic workflows to improve day-to-day practice. Addressing these challenges requires intentionality, creative problem solving, and strategy-sharing.

The scope of this research topic is broad and includes any system, technology, quality improvement and/or process improvement strategy that improves physician efficiency within a urology practice. The goals of improving clinical efficiency are both patient-centered and physician-centered. A more efficient practice can increase patient throughput and thereby improve patient access to urologic care. In addition, these changes allow the urologist to focus on urology and can help struggling clinicians recapture the joy in work.

The following themes will be explored:
- Clinic workflows and resource utilization
- Team-based care and effective delegation
- Time and task management strategies
- Process improvement for clinic efficiency
- Harnessing the electronic medical record
- Leveraging current technologies and telehealth
- Emerging technologies and future directions

Keywords: Urology, clinic efficiency, urologic care, patient care


Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Topic Editors

Loading..

Topic Coordinators

Loading..

Articles

Sort by:

Loading..

Authors

Loading..

total views

total views article views downloads topic views

}
 
Top countries
Top referring sites
Loading..

About Frontiers Research Topics

With their unique mixes of varied contributions from Original Research to Review Articles, Research Topics unify the most influential researchers, the latest key findings and historical advances in a hot research area! Find out more on how to host your own Frontiers Research Topic or contribute to one as an author.