This Research Topic seeks to tackle the pressing issue of variability in pathology practices concerning radical cystectomy (RC) specimens. Despite existing international guidelines, inconsistencies persist, particularly in prostate sampling and margin assessment through frozen sections.
This study will delve into the current hot open questions surrounding the development of consensus-driven, standardized protocols for RC specimen handling and evaluation. By analyzing multidisciplinary approaches and precision medicine demands, the research will evaluate the impact of standardized practices on diagnostic accuracy, tumor staging, and therapeutic decision-making in bladder cancer.
The goal is to establish robust evidence supporting uniform protocols that enhance patient outcomes and clinical decision-making.
Article types and fees
This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:
Brief Research Report
Case Report
Clinical Trial
Editorial
FAIR² Data
General Commentary
Hypothesis and Theory
Methods
Mini Review
Articles that are accepted for publication by our external editors following rigorous peer review incur a publishing fee charged to Authors, institutions, or funders.
Article types
This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:
Brief Research Report
Case Report
Clinical Trial
Editorial
FAIR² Data
General Commentary
Hypothesis and Theory
Methods
Mini Review
Opinion
Original Research
Perspective
Review
Systematic Review
Technology and Code
Keywords: Radical cystectomy, Standardization, Pathology protocols, Diagnostic accuracy, Bladder cancer
Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.