Clinical psychology has long recognized that psychological distress and therapeutic change involve more than cognitive processes alone. Emotion regulation, symptom expression, trauma responses, and treatment outcomes are shaped by bodily states, autonomic function, interoceptive awareness, and the lived contexts in which clients exist. Yet clinical research methods can overlook these embodied dimensions. Treating physiological variability, posture, breath, circadian timing, and relational dynamics as clinically meaningful variables can bring further insight into treatment and management pathways. When embodied dimensions are not systematically incorporated into research design and measurement, this can limit the precision of assessment, weaken treatment specificity, and contribute to unexplained variance in clinical outcomes.
Embodied approaches offer a framework for addressing these limitations. A growing evidence base demonstrates that autonomic regulation (e.g., heart rate variability, vagal tone), interoceptive accuracy, movement patterns, and sensorimotor processes influence symptom presentation, therapeutic alliance, and treatment response across a range of clinical conditions. For example, disruptions in embodied timing and sensorimotor prediction may contribute to symptoms in psychosis. Embodied cognitive-behavioral therapies that incorporate breath, movement, and bodily exploration improve emotional access and regulation in anxiety and trauma-related disorders. In chronic pain and somatic symptom conditions, interoceptive processing plays a central role in symptom persistence and modulation. Together, these findings suggest that the body is not peripheral to clinical phenomena, but may be central to understanding psychopathology, therapeutic process, and mechanisms of change.
This Research Topic welcomes theoretical, empirical, and methodological contributions that advance embodied approaches within clinical psychology research. It seeks research that integrates bodily and contextual variables into clinical assessment, case conceptualization, intervention design, and outcome measurement. By foregrounding the body in clinical research design and measurement, this collection aims to improve ecological validity, treatment precision, and the translational relevance of psychological science.
Contributions may address, but are not limited to, the following themes:
• Interoception, autonomic regulation, and their role in clinical assessment and symptom monitoring • Embodied mechanisms in psychotherapy process and outcome (e.g., somatic experiencing, body-oriented CBT, sensorimotor approaches) • Physiological markers (e.g., HRV, respiratory patterns, postural dynamics) as predictors or mediators of treatment response • Circadian, hormonal, and state-dependent factors influencing clinical presentation and intervention timing • Embodied perspectives on trauma, dissociation, chronic pain, and somatic symptom disorders • The therapeutic relationship as an embodied, relational process • Measurement development and validation for embodied constructs in clinical populations • Mixed-methods and ecological momentary assessment designs linking subjective experience with physiological data • Cross-cultural and contextual considerations in embodied clinical assessment • Process-oriented, longitudinal, or mechanism-focused study designs examining embodied pathways of clinical change
This Research Topic differs from methodological collections focused on general research planning and replicability, focusing on the substantive clinical content of embodiment, for instance, how bodily states, physiological processes, and lived context shape psychopathology, assessment, and therapeutic change. The goal is not to prescribe generic planning frameworks, but to demonstrate how embodied variables can be operationalized and measured within clinical research to improve the validity and applicability of findings.
The collection welcomes empirical studies, theoretical contributions, measurement and validation reports, clinical case studies, and systematic reviews. By consolidating embodied approaches in clinical psychology and protocol design, this Research Topic aims to establish best practices for integrating the body into clinical research and to advance a more holistic, ecologically valid science of psychological intervention.
Article types and fees
This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:
Brief Research Report
Case Report
Clinical Trial
Conceptual Analysis
Curriculum, Instruction, and Pedagogy
Data Report
Editorial
FAIR² Data
General Commentary
Articles that are accepted for publication by our external editors following rigorous peer review incur a publishing fee charged to Authors, institutions, or funders.
Article types
This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:
Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.