Advancing humanized mouse models for translational immunology and immunotherapy: Benchmarking, standardization, and next-generation design principles

  • 375

    Total views and downloads

About this Research Topic

Submission deadlines

  1. Manuscript Submission Deadline 14 July 2027

  2. This Research Topic is currently accepting articles

Background

Humanized mouse models have become essential platforms for investigating human immune development, function, and disease in vivo. By engrafting immunodeficient mice with human hematopoietic stem cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, immune tissues, or patient-derived tumors, these models provide experimentally tractable systems in which human immune responses can be studied under physiological and pathological conditions. Recent advances in host genetics, human cytokine expression, HLA matching, tissue engineering, and multi-omics analysis have improved the development and function of human lymphoid and myeloid compartments. These innovations are expanding the use of humanized mice beyond infectious disease research into cancer immunology, autoimmunity, allergy, transplantation, reproductive immunology, and the preclinical evaluation of immune-modulating therapies. However, variation in host strain, donor source, engraftment, and assay endpoints can limit reproducibility and cross-study comparison. Progress therefore depends on rigorous benchmarking, quality control, and immunological design principles that define when a model is fit for a specific translational purpose.

This Research Topic aims to advance the engineering, comparative evaluation, and immunological design of humanized mouse models, with model benchmarking, reproducibility, quality-control standards, and fit-for-purpose selection as its central themes. A central challenge is that no single model fully reproduces the complexity of the human immune system. Incomplete myeloid, NK-cell, B-cell, and tissue-resident immune development; donor-to-donor variability; xenogeneic graft-versus-host disease; species-specific cytokine incompatibility; and limited human lymphoid architecture can all affect experimental interpretation. We therefore seek studies that benchmark models using defined performance criteria, report donor and host variables transparently, establish quality-control measures for immune reconstitution and function, and guide fit-for-purpose model selection. Next-generation models should address defined limitations of existing systems. Validation may include comparison with patient samples, clinical responses, or complementary human in vitro systems. Disease- or therapy-specific studies, including those of immunotherapies and vaccines, should provide substantive methodological development, comparative evaluation, or biological validation of the model itself. Future humanized mouse models will likely benefit from integrating multiple immunoregulatory modules identified through study design and experimental findings, including mechanisms of self–non-self recognition, cross-species immune coexistence, and immune tolerance, to construct rational design principles derived from human physiology.

We welcome Original Research, Methods, Reviews, Mini Reviews, Perspectives, and Brief Research Reports addressing: benchmarking of HSC-, PBMC-, BLT-, and tissue-based models; standardized reporting and quality-control workflows; reproducibility across donors, host strains, facilities, and batches; and fit-for-purpose model selection. Additional areas include next-generation host strains and human cytokine or HLA knock-in models; development of lymphoid, myeloid, and tissue-resident immune compartments; tumor and patient-derived xenograft models; infection, autoimmunity, allergy, transplantation, and reproductive immunology; immunotherapies, vaccines, immune-related adverse events, and xenogeneic GVHD; and validation using patient samples, complementary human in vitro systems, spatial, single-cell, or multi-omics analyses. Disease- or therapy-specific submissions must demonstrate substantive model development, benchmarking, or biological validation rather than using a humanized mouse solely as an application platform. Comparative and reproducibility studies, including work defining model limitations, are particularly encouraged.

Article types and fees

This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:

  • Brief Research Report
  • Case Report
  • Classification
  • Clinical Trial
  • Conceptual Analysis
  • Data Report
  • Editorial
  • FAIR² Data
  • General Commentary

Articles that are accepted for publication by our external editors following rigorous peer review incur a publishing fee charged to Authors, institutions, or funders.

Keywords: Humanized mouse models, human hematopoietic stem cell engraftment, patient-derived xenograft models, HLA knock-in mice, xenogeneic graft-versus-host disease, immune reconstitution fidelity, cross-species immune tolerance

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Topic editors

Manuscripts can be submitted to this Research Topic via the main journal or any other participating journal.

Impact

  • 375Topic views
View impact