Optical Manipulation of Lanthanide-Doped Nanoparticles: How to Overcome Their Limitations

Introduction

Optical trapping (OT) of nanoparticles (NPs) by the forces exerted by a tightly focused laser beam has allowed innumerable advances in the study of single molecules and cells and the characterization of photonic nanomaterials. OT stands out for its ability to isolate and manipulate NPs for their study in a contactless and non-invasive way, and it has enabled the development of different techniques, such as photonic force microscopy, the optical manipulation for assembly or actuation in nanostructures, and diverse types of local contactless sensing (Maragò et al., 2013; Rodríguez-Sevilla et al., 2017a; Bradac, 2018; Bunea and Glückstad, 2019). For the application of optical tweezers in biological science, Arthur Ashkin, the inventor of the technique, was awarded with the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2018.

The most commonly optically trapped inorganic particles are silica and polystyrene beads. They are usually tracked to infer properties of the environment or employed as handlers for non-direct manipulation of, for example, biological molecules. However, their detection can become challenging if their size is reduced below the resolution limit of the optical setup. In contrast, OT of luminescent particles has the advantage of enabling their detection by their luminescence even if they are smaller than the resolution limit of the imaging system. Moreover, they have a great potential for sensing as most of them show environment-sensitive luminescence. Several types of luminescent particles have been already optically trapped: quantum dots (Jauffred et al., 2008; Jensen et al., 2016), nanodiamonds (Geiselmann et al., 2013; Neukirch et al., 2013, 2015), semiconductor nanowires (Reece et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2011a), niobate nanowires (Nakayama et al., 2007; Dutto et al., 2011), and lanthanide-doped nanoparticles (NPs:Ln) (Haro-Gonzalez et al., 2013; Rodríguez-Sevilla et al., 2015, 2016a; Kang et al., 2019). NPs:Ln stand out due to their photostability, long luminescence decay time, narrow and multiple emission bands, and tailorable luminescence characteristics. Within the NPs:Ln library, upconverting nanoparticles (UCNPs) are the most frequently optically trapped particles because they show low biotoxicity and present biocompatible excitation routes. They can absorb light of low energy and emit photons of higher energy through a non-linear process, e.g., emitting visible light after the successive absorption of two or more infrared photons (Labrador-Páez et al., 2018; Zheng et al., 2019). Thus, the combination of infrared biocompatible laser wavelengths with visible luminescence facilitates the detection and tracking of the trapped particle, making them great candidates for bio-applications as contactless local probes.

Multiple applications of NPs:Ln have been explored. Their temperature-sensitive luminescence can be used for local non-invasive temperature sensing of cells (Rodríguez-Sevilla et al., 2016; Drobczynski et al., 2017). Moreover, their polarized emission allows the measurement of the viscosity of the cytoplasm and the detection of single cells (Rodríguez-Sevilla et al., 2016b; Ortiz-Rivero et al., 2019). Other applications include the measurement of the size of bacteria and the labeling of RNA and cancer biomarkers for their quantification in bioassays (Li et al., 2017, 2018; Xin et al., 2017).

For all the aforementioned outstanding characteristics and the multitude of applications as remote contactless biosensors, the use of NPs:Ln for OT has been growing in the last decade. For these reasons, we have chosen to focus our attention on the OT of NPs:Ln and the challenges that the community is currently facing. In the next sections, we will firstly introduce the fundamentals of OT and its limitations for single NP:Ln manipulation. Then, we will discuss how these can be overcome, and we will envision future fields of application of OT of NPs:Ln.

Optical Trapping: Fundamentals

Optical manipulation is based on the optical forces that a tightly focused laser beam can exert on a particle thanks to the interaction between the electromagnetic field of the light and matter. The magnitude of these optical forces depends on the properties of the light (power, polarization, and beam shape), but predominantly on the characteristics of the particle (size, shape, and polarizability) (Ashkin et al., 1986; Rohrbach and Stelzer, 2001; Bendix et al., 2014).

From a simplified point of view, the optical force exerted on a particle could be visualized as the combination of the gradient and scattering forces. The gradient force acts as a restoring force that attracts the particle toward the maximum intensity of the laser beam, while the scattering force points in the same direction as the beam propagates and destabilizes the trap, pushing the particle away from the stable position. These forces should be balanced for achieving stable trapping conditions.

In the case of particles much smaller than the wavelength of the trapping light (Rayleigh regime), the scattering force can be neglected and the dynamics of the trapped particle can be described, taking into account only the action of the gradient force (Spesyvtseva and Dholakia, 2016). This is only completely true for nanoparticles with diameters smaller than some tens of nanometers. Bigger nanoparticles are still pushed by the optical scattering force, although its effect is usually neglected for simplification, as NP stable trapping can only be achieved when the gradient force overcomes the scattering force. The gradient force acting on the NP can be expressed as

$\begin{array}{ll}{\text{F}}_{\text{g}\text{r}\text{a}\text{d}}=\frac{1}{2}{\alpha }_{\text{N}\text{P}}\nabla \langle {{\text{E}}_{\text{T}\text{R}\text{A}\text{P}}}^2\rangle ,& (1)\end{array}$

where E_TRAP is the electric field of the trapping light and α_NP is the polarizability of the particle

$\begin{array}{ll}{\alpha }_{\text{N}\text{P}}=4\pi {\epsilon }_0{\text{V}}_{\text{N}\text{P}}\frac{{\epsilon }_{\text{N}\text{P}}-{\epsilon }_{\text{m}}}{{\epsilon }_{\text{N}\text{P}}+2{\epsilon }_{\text{m}}},& (2)\end{array}$

which depends on the volume of the particle (V_NP), and the electric permittivity of vacuum (ε₀), the surrounding medium (ε_m), and the nanoparticle (ε_NP). Thus, in this situation, the optical force decreases as the volume of the particle does. This is the main limitation in OT of NPs.

For biological applications, NPs are manipulated in liquid media. Thus, the trapped particle is subjected to the temperature-dependent Brownian fluctuations which destabilize it and make it oscillate around the equilibrium position. If the optical force is not large enough to compensate this motion (i.e., if the optical potential does not exceed at least 10 times the thermal energy k_BT, where k_B is the Boltzmann constant and T, the temperature), the particle will escape the optical trap, making its manipulation impossible.

For this reason, optical forces should be enhanced enabling the manipulation of NPs in liquid media. From expression (1), the magnitude of the optical force depends on the power of the trapping beam (i.e., $F_{grad}\propto {E_{TRAP}}^2$). However, increasing the trapping power in favor of higher optical forces would present side effects related to the absorption of the trapping radiation by either the particle or the medium. This could lead to a deterioration of the sample, but more importantly, it can cause an increase in temperature that would enhance the Brownian fluctuations (Peterman et al., 2003; Rodríguez-Sevilla et al., 2017b). Therefore, this solution is usually ruled out.

Other properties of the beam can also be tailored for the enhancement of the optical force. Expression (1) shows that the force depends on the gradient of the intensity of the beam (i.e., $F_{grad}\propto \nabla \langle {E_{TRAP}}^2\rangle$). For this reason, far-field optical manipulation of small particles makes use of high numerical aperture objective lenses to focus the laser beam to a small spot comparable to the particle size (Bartlett and Henderson, 2002; Rohrbach, 2005). However, the diffraction limit ($~\frac{\lambda }{2\mathrm{\text{NA}}}$) restricts the smallest spot that can be generated for a given trapping wavelength (λ) and numerical aperture (NA). For this reason, novel trapping strategies have been developed for OT of entities much smaller than the trapping wavelength (see section Optical Force Increase Based on the Reduction of the Optical Trap Volume).

The properties of the particle can also be tailored to enhance the optical force. The polarizability of the particle depends on the material of which it is made but also on the molecules that surround it (see section Optical Force Increase Based on Surface Modifications). In addition, it depends on the nanoparticle morphology. Anisotropic nanoparticles may show a certain degree of polarization. Their effective induced polarization is non-isotropic, which produced an optical torque to align the electric field with the particle polarization. Thus, the stable orientation inside the optical trap is strongly dependent on the incident electric field and the NP geometrical axis.

The trapped particle can add new functionalities to the optical manipulation tool, since it not only is useful to control its position and motion but also can be used as a force transducer. For this purpose, the optical trap should be calibrated. This can be done by different techniques that are based on the analysis of the motion of the trapped particle (Sarshar et al., 2014). These dynamics can be detected imaging the particle (video-tracking) or from the intensity fluctuation produced in the laser beam when it is scattered by the particle (Bui et al., 2018). The luminescence of NPs:Ln is advantageous since particles much smaller than the diffraction limit can be detected. However, the emission should be intense enough for a good signal-to-noise ratio. This is hard to achieve for very small particles due to their weak emission and the short acquisition times (high frame rates) required to effectively detect the particle dynamics. Although techniques have been developed for the use of limited frame rate (Wong and Halvorsen, 2006), NPs:Ln facilitate the use of this method thanks to their outstanding resistance to photobleaching that permit, for example, to track the particle for long periods of time. Single NP:Ln luminescence has been reported by different groups that managed to achieve the emission spectra of individual trapped nanoparticles based on drop-casting a diluted suspension (Schietinger et al., 2010; Gargas et al., 2014). However, for most bio-applications, the interest falls on assessing single NP emission in a colloidal suspension (Haro-Gonzalez et al., 2013; Rodríguez-Sevilla et al., 2015). The luminescence of single NP:Ln in solution has been spectroscopically characterized, which enabled the comparisons of the performance between different particles, and to study inter-particle interactions (Roder et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2020).

Optical Trapping of Lanthanide-Doped Nanoparticles

As explained in section Optical Trapping: Fundamentals, it is challenging to manipulate NPs with conventional OT strategies as the optical forces decrease with the particle volume. In this section, we describe different strategies used to increase the magnitude of the optical forces, which either modify the particle surface (section Optical Force Increase Based on Surface Modifications) or reduce the optical trap volume (section Optical Force Increase Based on the Reduction of the Optical Trap Volume). Table 1 summarizes the most relevant NPs:Ln used to date, as well as the maximum optical forces achieved.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Classification of the most relevant techniques used on NPs:Ln to enhance their optical force.

Optical Force Increase Based on Surface Modifications

OT of NPs:Ln is challenging because they are dielectric particles with low polarizability (α_NP) and the trapping force scale with α_NP. Expression (2) shows that α_NP depends on the dielectric constants of the NP and that of the environment, so that α_NP optimization can be achieved by modifying the NP material and/or the surrounding medium. A large number of methods for surface modification of NPs have been reported (Wang et al., 2011b; Hirsch, 2020), which enhance the NPs:Ln luminescence (i.e., easing the tracking) and their colloidal stability, while providing the possibility of subsequent bioconjugation. However, despite its interest, the optimization of the optical forces acting on single NP:Ln through its surface modification is a route that has not been thoroughly explored. Some synthesis/surface modification strategies are included in Table 1.

Colloidal NPs present a superficial charge which interacts with the solvent's ions. These changes distribute around the particle forming an electric double layer characterized by the zeta potential, as depicted in Figures 1A,B, which influences α_NP. The NPs may have a surface coating to improve their colloidal properties and zeta potential. For the optimization of α_NP, Rodríguez-Rodríguez et al. (2015) studied the influence of the surface coating of 8-nm SrF₂:Er,Yb NPs:Ln on the trapping efficiency. They increased α_NP by replacing the cationic species on the NP surface by more mobile ones in solution. This modification led to an almost 50-fold enhancement in the trapping efficiency, showing that the contribution of the surface coating to the net polarizability dominates over that of the NP:Ln core material. This study was continued by Rodríguez-Sevilla et al. (2018), determining the optical forces acting on NaYF₄:Er,Yb NPs:Ln of different sizes (ranging from 5 to 100 nm). They experimentally demonstrated that the optical forces (parameterized by the trapping factor Q) acting on a NP:Ln depend on the electrostatic properties (zeta potential) of the interface between the NP and the surrounding medium more strongly than on their volume (see expression 2 and Figure 1C). Alternatively, selecting the right medium (the solvent molecules) can be essential to optimizing the zeta potential value. Likewise, the temperature of the medium, which affects its permittivity (Catenaccio et al., 2003) and conductivity (Cao et al., 2019) and indirectly α_NP, can lead to the enhancement of the optical forces, though the Brownian motion increase may be detrimental.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Optical trapping of a NP:Ln in a solvent by different systems based on the reduction of the optical trap volume. (A) A ligand-free lanthanide-doped dielectric NP (permittivity ε_NP) in a medium (permittivity ε_m). (B) A dielectric NP:Ln coated with ligands (coating permittivity ε_c). The electric double layer is indicated by the circles. (C) Optical trapping strength, represented by the Q-factor, as a function of the zeta potential for different types of NP:Ln. Adapted with permission from Rodríguez-Sevilla et al. (2018). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (D) Bright-field (top) and dark-field (bottom) images of two NPs:Ln (I and II) and an E. coli bacterium trapped in a row by optical fiber tweezers. Adapted with permission from Xin et al. (2017). Copyright 2017 John Wiley and Sons. (E) Schematic of a dual optical fiber tweezer system. (F) Schematic and microscopy image of a single fiber tip trap including the auxiliary fiber tip used for particle emission recording of a single NP:Ln. OSA Open Access License for OSA-Formatted Journal Article PDFs (Leménager et al., 2018). (G) Tip of an optical fiber with an array of coupled spherical microlenses that are able to trap nanoparticles. The fiber probe also records the detection signal. The sequential growth, in backscattering signal, as different nanoparticles are trapped by the microlenses is shown in (H). Adapted with permission from Li Y. et al. (2016). Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.

Optical Force Increase Based on the Reduction of the Optical Trap Volume

An alternative strategy to improve the optical forces acting on single NP:Ln consists of the reduction of the optical trap size to increase the electric field gradient [see expression (1)]. When the dimensions of a bulk material are reduced, new properties appear such as the ability to confine light into a region much smaller than the wavelength (Koya et al., 2020). With that purpose, plasmonic effects and optical resonances have been employed to enhance the trapping forces and luminescence of NPs:Ln.

Optical nanotweezers are metallic or dielectric nanostructures that can generate strong electromagnetic field gradients as they can confine the light to a subwavelength region using lower laser powers than conventional OT (Shoji and Tsuboi, 2014; Huang and Yang, 2015). Their development was mainly motivated by the aim to suppress the scattering forces for NP trapping (Min et al., 2013).

Nanotweezers have been proven to allow the manipulation and detection of single NP and small molecules, controlling their motion in the nanoscale. Different plasmonic and dielectric nanostructures have been developed for OT of luminescent NPs (e.g., polystyrene fluorescent beads or quantum dots Yoo et al., 2018; Xu and Crozier, 2019; Kotsifaki et al., 2020). Furthermore, the luminescence of the trapped particle can be excited by an additional beam or through an upconversion process using the trapping beam. Although the manipulation of sub-30-nm dielectric nanoparticles by plasmonic optical tweezers has been demonstrated, the manipulation of NPs:Ln by this technique is yet to be achieved (to our knowledge), which would bring the outstanding capabilities of these particles to the nanoscale.

In a different strategy, several studies have developed innovative optical tweezers based on optical fibers, which was firstly demonstrated by Fuh et al. (1987) and Constable et al. (1993). As an alternative to bulky high-numerical aperture objective lenses, optical fibers can create a sub-diffraction spot at their tip if it is judiciously modified, i.e., providing it with a lenticular shape (Li et al., 2015; Li Y.-C. et al., 2016; Li Y. et al., 2017). This has the advantage of compactness and high manipulation flexibility due to their reduced size. Moreover, it also results in different trapping and luminescence recording configurations. The focusing capabilities of the optical fiber can be optimized by modifying the shape of its tip and, for example, overcome the diffraction limit (Berthelot et al., 2014; Asadollahbaik et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2020). Direct trapping of NPs:Ln has been achieved with a single fiber-coupled laser, reducing drastically the size of the experimental setup. H. Xin et al. used a tapered fiber tip capable of tightly focusing the output light resulting in a high-intensity gradient. As shown in Figure 1D, they employed this strategy to measure the length of single bacterium by co-trapping in a row a KLu₂F₇:Yb,Er NP:Ln of 120 nm (with a trap stiffness of 14.1 pN/m W), a single E. coli bacterium, and then a second NP:Ln (12.8 pN/mW). In comparison with other Yb, Er co-doped NPs:Ln included in Table 1, their trapping stiffness was several orders of magnitude larger, demonstrating the efficiency of this approach.

Another approach to optimize OT of NPs is based on dual fiber tweezers. Counter-propagating traps based on two opposite fibers have been proven to be able to stably trap NPs:Ln for the study of their luminescence. Although the optical forces exerted on the NPs have not been reported, their magnitude is expected to be higher than for conventional OT. For example, Leménager et al. (2018) recorded the anisotropic emission of trapped NaYF₄:Er,Yb,Gd nanorods in three orthogonal directions using distinct methods: through the microscope objective, by coupling it into one of the trapping fiber tip, and by coupling it into a third fiber (see Figures 1E,F). In a similar way, Kumar et al. (2020) studied nanorods of NaYF₄:Eu, measuring their 3D orientation by europium ion polarization-dependent luminescence.

The dual-beam configuration can be further improved by its combination with the modification of the fiber tip, adding a micro-lens. The main advantage of using microscopic lenses over typically macroscopic ones is their considerably smaller focusing spot size and mobility inside the sample. This has been reported to enhance the optical forces for nanosized polystyrene particles so it could also be used for NP:Ln. For instance, Asadollahbaik et al. positioned 3D-printed diffractive Fresnel lenses at the tip of the fibers in a counter-propagating arrangement. This novel miniaturized optical setup can produce a variety of NA with a large working distance and a reduced trapping spot, increasing the trap stiffness by a factor of 35–50 (1762.87 pN/μm W). On the other hand, a microlens can also be realized by a colloidal particle such as a dielectric microcylinder or microsphere.

When it is optically trapped, the particle focuses the light and a nanosized photonic jet is generated at its shadow-side surface. Photonic nanojets can propagate over a distance corresponding to several optical wavelengths without significant divergence, and their waist size is below the diffraction limit, depending on the microlens diameter, diffraction index, and laser wavelength (Chen et al., 2004; Neves, 2015). In addition, the light backscattering and the nanoparticle luminescence can be enhanced and recorded, making fiber-coupled microspheres suitable for NPs:Ln optical manipulation. Li et al. reported different types of cells as natural bio-microlens. Then, NPs:Ln were coupled to pathogenic bacteria, which then were subsequently trapped individually or in chains. The maximum trapping efficiency they obtained was 448 pN μm⁻¹ W⁻¹ for an NP:Ln-covered E. coli bacterium. More complex systems present a parallel photonic nanojet array, produced by assembling and binding microlenses on a single optical fiber tip, as depicted in Figures 1G,H (Li Y. et al., 2016; Schäffner et al., 2020).

Future Perspectives and Conclusions

Lanthanide-doped nanoparticles present unique, environment-sensitive, selective, and bio-compatible spectroscopic characteristics that stand out among other dielectric luminescent nanoparticles. Hence, they are ideal for optical trapping, a non-invasive and versatile tool used to manipulate small objects. Their main drawback is their reduced size of nanoparticles, which is below the diffraction limit of the optics system and reduces the achievable optical forces. In this review, we have analyzed the strategies that have been developed or would be of potential use to overcome this limitation, i.e., the modification of the lanthanide-doped nanoparticle's characteristics and the optimization of the optical tweezer setup. Some of these techniques can also enhance the luminescence of the lanthanide-doped nanoparticle, which is of great interest for numerous applications. Despite the potential of the reviewed techniques, their implementation is an underdeveloped field. We think these already proven strategies could open the door to widen the application of lanthanide-doped nanoparticles, which present better capabilities and multifunctionalities than other commonly used nanoparticles.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación de España (PID2019-105195RA-I00) and by Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (SI1/PJI/2019-00052). LL-P acknowledges Carl Tryggers Foundation (CTS 18: 229).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Anbharasi, L., Bhanu Rekha, E. A., Rahul, V. R., Roy, B., Gunaseelan, M., Yamini, S., et al. (2020). Tunable emission and optical trapping of upconverting LiYF4:Yb,Er nanocrystal. Opt. Laser Technol. 126:106109. doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106109

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Asadollahbaik, A., Thiele, S., Weber, K., Kumar, A., Drozella, J., Sterl, F., et al. (2020). Highly efficient dual-fiber optical trapping with 3D printed diffractive fresnel lenses. ACS Photonics 7, 88–97. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b01024

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ashkin, A., Dziedzic, J. M., Bjorkholm, J. E., and Chu, S. (1986). Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles. Opt. Lett. 11, 288–290. doi: 10.1364/OL.11.000288

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bartlett, P., and Henderson, S. (2002). Three-dimensional force calibration of a single-beam optical gradient trap. J. Phys. Condensed Matter. 14, 7757–7768. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/14/33/314

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bendix, P. M., Jauffred, L., Norregaard, K., and Oddershede, L. B. (2014). Optical trapping of nanoparticles and quantum dots. IEEE J. Selected Topics Quant. Electron. 20, 15–26. doi: 10.1109/JSTQE.2013.2287094

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Berthelot, J., Aćimović, S. S., Juan, M. L., Kreuzer, M. P., Renger, J., and Quidant, R. (2014). Three-dimensional manipulation with scanning near-field optical nanotweezers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 295–299. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2014.24

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bradac, C. (2018). Nanoscale optical trapping: a review. Adv. Opt. Mater. 6:1800005. doi: 10.1002/adom.201800005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bui, A. A. M., Kashchuk, A. V., Balanant, M. A., Nieminen, T. A., Rubinsztein-Dunlop, H., and Stilgoe, A. B. (2018). Calibration of force detection for arbitrarily shaped particles in optical tweezers. Sci. Rep. 8:10798. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28876-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bunea, A. I., and Glückstad, J. (2019). Strategies for optical trapping in biological samples: aiming at microrobotic surgeons. Laser Photon. Rev. 13:1800227. doi: 10.1002/lpor.201800227

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, W., Chern, M., Dennis, A. M., and Brown, K. A. (2019). Measuring nanoparticle polarizability using fluorescence microscopy. Nano Lett. 19, 5762–5768. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02402

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Catenaccio, A., Daruich, Y., and Magallanes, C. (2003). Temperature dependence of the permittivity of water. Chem. Phys. Lett. 367, 669–671. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(02)01735-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Z., Taflove, A., and Backman, V. (2004). Photonic nanojet enhancement of backscattering of light by nanoparticles: a potential novel visible-light ultramicroscopy technique. Opt. Express 12, 1214–1220. doi: 10.1364/OPEX.12.001214

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Constable, A., Kim, J., Mervis, J., Zarinetchi, F., and Prentiss, M. (1993). Demonstration of a fiber-optical light-force trap. Opt. Lett. 18, 1867–1869. doi: 10.1364/OL.18.001867

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Drobczynski, S., Prorok, K., Tamarov, K., Dus-Szachniewicz, K., Lehto, V.-P., and Bednarkiewicz, A. (2017). Toward controlled photothermal treatment of single cell: optically induced heating and remote temperature monitoring in vitro through double wavelength optical tweezers. ACS Photonics 4, 1993–2002. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00375

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dutto, F., Raillon, C., Schenk, K., and Radenovic, A. (2011). Nonlinear optical response in single alkaline niobate nanowires. Nano Lett. 11, 2517–2521. doi: 10.1021/nl201085b

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fuh, M.-R. S., Burgess, L. W., Hirschfeld, T., Christian, G. D., and Wang, F. (1987). Single fibre optic fluorescence pH probe. Analyst 112, 1159–1163. doi: 10.1039/an9871201159

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gargas, D. J., Chan, E. M., Ostrowski, A. D., Aloni, S., Altoe, M. V. P., Barnard, E. S., et al. (2014). Engineering bright sub-10-nm upconverting nanocrystals for single-molecule imaging. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 300–305. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2014.29

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Geiselmann, M., Juan, M. L., Renger, J., Say, J. M., Brown, L. J., De Abajo, F. J. G., et al. (2013). Three-dimensional optical manipulation of a single electron spin. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8:175. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2012.259

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haro-Gonzalez, P., del Rosal, B., Maestro, L. M., Martin Rodriguez, E., Naccache, R., Capobianco, J. A., et al. (2013). Optical trapping of NaYF4:Er3+,Yb3+ upconverting fluorescent nanoparticles. Nanoscale 5:12192. doi: 10.1039/c3nr03644h

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hirsch, T. (2020). “Surface modification of near infrared-emitting nanoparticles for biomedical applications,” in Near Infrared-Emitting Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications, eds A. Benayas, E. Hemmer, G. Hong, and D. Jaque (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 49–61. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-32036-2_3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, J.-S., and Yang, Y.-T. (2015). Origin and future of plasmonic optical tweezers. Nanomaterials 5, 1048–1065. doi: 10.3390/nano5021048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jauffred, L., Richardson, A. C., and Oddershede, L. B. (2008). Three-dimensional optical control of individual quantum dots. Nano Lett. 8, 3376–3380. doi: 10.1021/nl801962f

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jensen, R. A., Huang, I.-C., Chen, O., Choy, J. T., Bischof, T. S., Loncar, M., et al. (2016). Optical trapping and two-photon excitation of colloidal quantum dots using bowtie apertures. ACS Photonics 3, 423–427. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00575

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kang, Y.-F., Zheng, B., Song, C.-Y., Li, C.-Y., Chen, Z.-L., Wu, Q.-S., et al. (2019). Evaluation of luminescence properties of single hydrophilic upconversion nanoparticles by optical trapping. J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 10107–10113. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b00430

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kotsifaki, D. G., Truong, V. G., and Chormaic, S. N. (2020). Fano-resonant, asymmetric, metamaterial-assisted tweezers for single nanoparticle trapping. Nano Lett. 20, 3388–3395. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00300

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koya, A. N., Cunha, J., Guo, T.-L., Toma, A., Garoli, D., Wang, T., et al. (2020). Novel plasmonic nanocavities for optical trapping-assisted biosensing applications. Adv. Opti. Mater. 8:1901481. doi: 10.1002/adom.201901481

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, A., Kim, J., Lahlil, K., Julie, G., Nic Chormaic, S., Kim, J., et al. (2020). Optical trapping and orientation-resolved spectroscopy of europium-doped nanorods. J. Phys. Photonics 2:025007. doi: 10.1088/2515-7647/ab83e3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Labrador-Páez, L., Ximendes, E. C., Rodríguez-Sevilla, P., Ortgies, D. H., Rocha, U., Jacinto, C., et al. (2018). Core–shell rare-earth-doped nanostructures in biomedicine. Nanoscale 10, 12935–12956. doi: 10.1039/C8NR02307G

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Leménager, G., Thiriet, M., Pourcin, F., Lahlil, K., Valdivia-Valero, F., Colas des Francs, G., et al. (2018). Size-dependent trapping behavior and optical emission study of NaYF4 nanorods in optical fiber tip tweezers. Opt. Express 26, 32156–32167. doi: 10.1364/OE.26.032156

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, C.-Y., Cao, D., Qi, C.-B., Kang, Y.-F., Song, C.-Y., Xu, D.-D., et al. (2018). Combining holographic optical tweezers with upconversion luminescence encoding: imaging-based stable suspension array for sensitive responding of dual cancer biomarkers. Anal. Chem. 90, 2639–2647. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04299

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, C.-Y., Cao, D., Song, C.-Y., Xu, C.-M., Ma, X.-Y., Zhang, Z.-L., et al. (2017). Integrating optical tweezers with up-converting luminescence: a non-amplification analytical platform for quantitative detection of microRNA-21 sequences. Chem. Commun. 53, 4092–4095. doi: 10.1039/C7CC01133D

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Liu, X., Yang, X., Lei, H., Zhang, Y., and Li, B. (2017). Enhancing upconversion fluorescence with a natural bio-microlens. ACS Nano 11:10672. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b04420

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Xin, H., Cheng, C., Zhang, Y., and Li, B. (2015). Optical separation and controllable delivery of cells from particle and cell mixture. Nanophotonics 4:353. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2015-0008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Xin, H., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Lei, H., and Li, B. (2016). Trapping and detection of nanoparticles and cells using a parallel photonic nanojet array. ACS Nano 10, 5800–5808. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b08081

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y.-C., Xin, H.-B., Lei, H.-X., Liu, L.-L., Li, Y.-Z., Zhang, Y., et al. (2016). Manipulation and detection of single nanoparticles and biomolecules by a photonic nanojet. Light Sci. Appl. 5, e16176–e16176. doi: 10.1038/lsa.2016.176

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maragò, O. M., Jones, P. H., Gucciardi, P. G., Volpe, G., and Ferrari, A. C. (2013). Optical trapping and manipulation of nanostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 807–817. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2013.208

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Min, C., Shen, Z., Shen, J., Zhang, Y., Fang, H., Yuan, G., et al. (2013). Focused plasmonic trapping of metallic particles. Nat. Commun. 4:2891. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3891

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mor, F. M., Sienkiewicz, A., Forr,ó, L., and Jeney, S. (2014). Upconversion particle as a local luminescent brownian probe: a photonic force microscopy study. ACS Photonics 1, 1251–1257. doi: 10.1021/ph500189w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakayama, Y., Pauzauskie, P. J., Radenovic, A., Onorato, R. M., Saykally, R. J., Liphardt, J., et al. (2007). Tunable nanowire nonlinear optical probe. Nature 447, 1098–1101. doi: 10.1038/nature05921

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Neukirch, L. P., Gieseler, J., Quidant, R., Novotny, L., and Nick Vamivakas, A. (2013). Observation of nitrogen vacancy photoluminescence from an optically levitated nanodiamond. Opt. Lett. 38, 2976–2979. doi: 10.1364/OL.38.002976

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Neukirch, L. P., Von Haartman, E., Rosenholm, J. M., and Vamivakas, A. N. (2015). Multi-dimensional single-spin nano-optomechanics with a levitated nanodiamond. Nat. Photonics 9, 653–657. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.162

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Neves, A. A. R. (2015). Photonic nanojets in optical tweezers. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 162, 122–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.03.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ortiz-Rivero, E., Prorok, K., Skowickł, M., Lu, D., Bednarkiewicz, A., Jaque, D., et al. (2019). Single-cell biodetection by upconverting microspinners. Small 15:1904154. doi: 10.1002/smll.201904154

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peterman, E. J. G., Gittes, F., and Schmidt, C. F. (2003). Laser-induced heating in optical traps. Biophys. J. 84, 1308–1316. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74946-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reece, P. J., Paiman, S., Abdul-Nabi, O., Gao, Q., Gal, M., Tan, H. H., et al. (2009). Combined optical trapping and microphotoluminescence of single InP nanowires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95:101109. doi: 10.1063/1.3225148

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roder, P. B., Smith, B. E., Zhou, X., Crane, M. J., and Pauzauskie, P. J. (2015). Laser refrigeration of hydrothermal nanocrystals in physiological media. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 15024–15029. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510418112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Rodríguez, H., Rodríguez Sevilla, P., Martín Rodríguez, E., Ortgies, D. H., Pedroni, M., Speghini, A., et al. (2015). Enhancing optical forces on fluorescent up-converting nanoparticles by surface charge tailoring. Small 11, 1555–1561. doi: 10.1002/smll.201402587

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Sevilla, P., Zhang, Y., Haro-González, P., Sanz-Rodríguez, F., Jaque, F., García Sole, J., et al. (2017b). Avoiding Induced Heating in Optical Trap. San Diego, CA: SPIE Nanoscience + Engineering.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Sevilla, P., Labrador-Páez, L., Jaque, D., and Haro-González, P. (2017a). Optical trapping for biosensing: materials and applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 5, 9085–9101. doi: 10.1039/C7TB01921A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Sevilla, P., Labrador-Páez, L., Wawrzyńczyk, D., Nyk, M., Samoć, M., Kar, A. K., et al. (2016a). Determining the 3D orientation of optically trapped upconverting nanorods by in situ single-particle polarized spectroscopy. Nanoscale 8, 300–308. doi: 10.1039/C5NR06419H

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Sevilla, P., Prorok, K., Bednarkiewicz, A., Marqués, M. I., García-Martín, A., García Solé, J., et al. (2018). Optical forces at the nanoscale: size and electrostatic effects. Nano Lett. 18, 602–609. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04804

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Sevilla, P., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, H., Pedroni, M., Speghini, A., Bettinelli, M., Sol,é, J. G., et al. (2015). Assessing single upconverting nanoparticle luminescence by optical tweezers. Nano Lett. 15, 5068–5074. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01184

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Sevilla, P., Zhang, Y., de Sousa, N., Marqués, M. I., Sanz-Rodríguez, F., Jaque, D., et al. (2016b). Optical torques on upconverting particles for intracellular microrheometry. Nano Lett. 16, 8005–8014. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04583

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Sevilla, P., Zhang, Y., Haro-González, P., Sanz-Rodríguez, F., Jaque, F., Solé, J. G., et al. (2016). Thermal scanning at the cellular level by an optically trapped upconverting fluorescent particle. Adv. Mater. 28, 2421–2426. doi: 10.1002/adma.201505020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rohrbach, A. (2005). Stiffness of optical traps: quantitative agreement between experiment and electromagnetic theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95:168102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.168102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rohrbach, A., and Stelzer, E. H. K. (2001). Optical trapping of dielectric particles in arbitrary fields. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 839–853. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.18.000839

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sarshar, M., Wong, W., and Anvari, B. (2014). Comparative study of methods to calibrate the stiffness of a single-beam gradient-force optical tweezers over various laser trapping powers. J. Biomed. Opt. 19:115001. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.11.115001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schäffner, D., Preuschoff, T., Ristok, S., Brozio, L., Schlosser, M., Giessen, H., et al. (2020). Arrays of individually controllable optical tweezers based on 3D-printed microlens arrays. Opt. Express 28, 8640–8645. doi: 10.1364/OE.386243

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schietinger, S., Aichele, T., Wang, H.-Q., Nann, T., and Benson, O. (2010). Plasmon-enhanced upconversion in single NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ codoped nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 10, 134–138. doi: 10.1021/nl903046r

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shoji, T., and Tsuboi, Y. (2014). Plasmonic optical tweezers toward molecular manipulation: tailoring plasmonic nanostructure, light source, and resonant trapping. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 2957–2967. doi: 10.1021/jz501231h

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spesyvtseva, S. E. S., and Dholakia, K. (2016). Trapping in a material world. ACS Photonics 3, 719–736. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, F., Reece, P. J., Paiman, S., Gao, Q., Tan, H. H., and Jagadish, C. (2011a). Nonlinear optical processes in optically trapped InP nanowires. Nano Lett. 11, 4149–4153. doi: 10.1021/nl2020262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, M., Abbineni, G., Clevenger, A., Mao, C., and Xu, S. (2011b). Upconversion nanoparticles: synthesis, surface modification and biological applications. Nanomedicine 7, 710–729. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2011.02.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wong, W. P., and Halvorsen, K. (2006). The effect of integration time on fluctuation measurements: calibrating an optical trap in the presence of motion blur. Opt. Express 14, 12517–12531. doi: 10.1364/OE.14.012517

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xin, H., Li, Y., Xu, D., Zhang, Y., Chen, C.-H., and Li, B. (2017). Single upconversion nanoparticle–bacterium cotrapping for single-bacterium labeling and analysis. Small 13, 1603418. doi: 10.1002/smll.201603418

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, Z., and Crozier, K. B. (2019). All-dielectric nanotweezers for trapping and observation of a single quantum dot. Opt. Express 27, 4034–4045. doi: 10.1364/OE.27.004034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yoo, D., Gurunatha, K. L., Choi, H.-K., Mohr, D. A., Ertsgaard, C. T., Gordon, R., et al. (2018). Low-power optical trapping of nanoparticles and proteins with resonant coaxial nanoaperture using 10 nm gap. Nano Lett. 18, 3637–3642. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00732

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, X., Zhao, N., Shi, Y., Xin, H., and Li, B. (2020). Optical fiber tweezers: a versatile tool for optical trapping and manipulation. Micromachines 11:114. doi: 10.3390/mi11020114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, K., Loh, K. Y., Wang, Y., Chen, Q., Fan, J., Jung, T., et al. (2019). Recent advances in upconversion nanocrystals: expanding the kaleidoscopic toolbox for emerging applications. Nano Today 29:100797. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2019.100797

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, J., Chizhik, A. I., Chu, S., and Jin, D. (2020). Single-particle spectroscopy for functional nanomaterials. Nature 579, 41–50. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2048-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar