impact factor Coming 2019

Frontiers journals are at the top of citation and impact metrics

Original Research ARTICLE Provisionally accepted The full-text will be published soon. Notify me

Front. Mar. Sci. | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00275

Primary productivity dynamics in the summer Arctic Ocean confirms broad regulation of the electron requirement for carbon fixation by light-phytoplankton community interaction

 Yuanli Zhu1, 2,  David Suggett3, Chenggang Liu1, Jianfeng He4, Longshan Lin5, Fengfeng Le1, Joji Ishizaka2,  Joaquim Goes6 and Qiang Hao1*
  • 1Second Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, China
  • 2Nagoya University, Japan
  • 3University of Technology Sydney, Australia
  • 4Polar Research Institute of China, China
  • 5Third Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, China
  • 6Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory (LDEO), United States

Predicting conversion of photosynthetic electron transport to inorganic carbon uptake rates (the so-called electron requirement for carbon fixation, KC) is central to the broad scale deployment of Fast Repetition Rate fluorometry (FRRf) for primary productivity studies. However, reconciling variability of KC over space and time to produce robust algorithms remains challenging given the large number of factors that influence KC. We have previously shown that light appears a proximal driver of Kc in several ocean regions and therefore examined whether and how light similarly regulated KC variability in the Arctic Ocean during a summer cruise 2016. Sampling transited ice-free and ice-covered waters, with temperature, salinity and Chl-a concentrations all higher for the ice-free than ice covered surface waters. Micro- and pico-phytoplankton generally dominated the ice-free and ice-covered waters respectively. Values of KC, determined from parallel measures of daily integrated electron transport rates and 14C-uptake, were overall lower for the ice-covered versus ice-free stations. As in our previous studies, KC was strongly linearly correlated to daily PAR (r=0.68, n=46, p<0.001) and this relationship could be further improved (r=0.84, n=46, p<0.001) by separating samples into ice-free (micro-phytoplankton dominated) versus ice-covered (Nano- and Pico-phytoplankton dominated water. We subsequently contrasted the PAR-KC relationship form the Arctic waters with the previous relationships from the Ariake Bay and East China Sea, and revealed that these various PAR-KC relationships can be systematically explained across regions by phytoplankton community size structure. Specifically, the value of the linear slope describing PAR-KC decreases as water bodies have an increasing fraction of larger phytoplankton. We propose that this synoptic trend reflects how phytoplankton community structure integrates past and immediate environmental histories and hence may be better broad-scale predictor of KC than specific environmental factors such as temperature and nutrients. We provide a novel algorithm that may enable broad-scale retrieval of CO2 uptake from FRRf with knowledge of light and phytoplankton community size information.

Keywords: Primary productivity, Arctic Ocean, ice free/cover, Electron requirement for carbon fixation, Phytoplankton community, FRRF

Received: 30 Nov 2018; Accepted: 07 May 2019.

Edited by:

Hongbin Liu, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong

Reviewed by:

Peng Jin, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, University of Guangzhou, China
Nina Schuback, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland  

Copyright: © 2019 Zhu, Suggett, Liu, He, Lin, Le, Ishizaka, Goes and Hao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Dr. Qiang Hao, Second Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Hangzhou, China,