While mitigating climate change is critical to countering the numerous threats to marine biodiversity and coastal communities, adaptation is a parallel need as emphasized under the Paris Agreement. Every country is required to: engage in adaptation planning processes which are gender-responsive, participatory and respectful of human rights; consider the formulation of national adaptation plans and prioritized actions; build the resilience of socioeconomic and ecological systems; and submit periodic adaptation communications. The Paris Agreement also encourages the sharing of good practices and lessons learned in relation to adaptation science, planning, policies and implementation actions.The overall objective of this Research Topic is to share case study experiences on how ocean climate adaptation is faring at regional, national and local levels in order to draw out buoyant governance practices and lessons learned. These lessons can be based on learning from success, but also include learning from failure. Key multilevel governance questions will be explored in the case studies. Examples of the types of questions that may be addressed at the three different levels are listed below. These are not exhaustive and alternative questions for exploration are welcomed.RegionalWhat is the extent of regional scientific cooperation relating to climate change adaptation and what are some of the approaches to facilitating cooperation?How are regional fisheries management organizations and/or regional sea arrangements responding to climate change and supporting adaptation by marine-based industries?What transboundary area-based management approaches for increasing ecosystem resilience have been implemented and how effective are they?What are the major impediments to adaptive management at the regional level?NationalWhat national adaptation strategies or policies have been implemented and what was the process for their development?Are there specific examples of good governance responses to shifting species and ecosystems?How “climate ready” are national laws and policies to address adaptation, for example, in relation to MPAs, fisheries, aquaculture, species at risk protection, environmental impact assessment and integrated planning?What are the major constraints to adaptive management at the national level?LocalAre there efforts to document local and Indigenous knowledge regarding changing marine ecosystems, for example, through “citizen science” initiatives?Have local and Indigenous communities been involved in adaptation planning and if so, to what extent and in what ways?Are there examples of local or Indigenous governance responses to shifting species and ecosystems, such as, through community-based management measures or new livelihood opportunities?What are the major challenges in implementing adaptive governance at the local level?The Research Topic will address various governance approaches to ocean climate adaptation that have emerged. They include: the establishment of marine protected areas and other effective area-based measures to enhance resilience; implementation of precautionary and ecosystem approaches; ecological restoration; integrated coastal and ocean management and marine spatial planning; and reduction of other human stressors, such as overfishing and pollution. The need for adaptive and science-informed policy responses has been highlighted in the Implementation Plan for the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development 2021-2030.The Research Topic will be a collection of manuscripts emerging primarily from the upcomingIMBeR IMBIZO6 Workshop 3 to showcase the work in progress addressing the proposed Research Topic with a multi-scales and transdisciplinary approach. The Research Topic will also welcome contributions outside the IMBeR IMBIZO 6 Workshop 3 that will address the scope and the themes of this collection.
While mitigating climate change is critical to countering the numerous threats to marine biodiversity and coastal communities, adaptation is a parallel need as emphasized under the Paris Agreement. Every country is required to: engage in adaptation planning processes which are gender-responsive, participatory and respectful of human rights; consider the formulation of national adaptation plans and prioritized actions; build the resilience of socioeconomic and ecological systems; and submit periodic adaptation communications. The Paris Agreement also encourages the sharing of good practices and lessons learned in relation to adaptation science, planning, policies and implementation actions.The overall objective of this Research Topic is to share case study experiences on how ocean climate adaptation is faring at regional, national and local levels in order to draw out buoyant governance practices and lessons learned. These lessons can be based on learning from success, but also include learning from failure. Key multilevel governance questions will be explored in the case studies. Examples of the types of questions that may be addressed at the three different levels are listed below. These are not exhaustive and alternative questions for exploration are welcomed.RegionalWhat is the extent of regional scientific cooperation relating to climate change adaptation and what are some of the approaches to facilitating cooperation?How are regional fisheries management organizations and/or regional sea arrangements responding to climate change and supporting adaptation by marine-based industries?What transboundary area-based management approaches for increasing ecosystem resilience have been implemented and how effective are they?What are the major impediments to adaptive management at the regional level?NationalWhat national adaptation strategies or policies have been implemented and what was the process for their development?Are there specific examples of good governance responses to shifting species and ecosystems?How “climate ready” are national laws and policies to address adaptation, for example, in relation to MPAs, fisheries, aquaculture, species at risk protection, environmental impact assessment and integrated planning?What are the major constraints to adaptive management at the national level?LocalAre there efforts to document local and Indigenous knowledge regarding changing marine ecosystems, for example, through “citizen science” initiatives?Have local and Indigenous communities been involved in adaptation planning and if so, to what extent and in what ways?Are there examples of local or Indigenous governance responses to shifting species and ecosystems, such as, through community-based management measures or new livelihood opportunities?What are the major challenges in implementing adaptive governance at the local level?The Research Topic will address various governance approaches to ocean climate adaptation that have emerged. They include: the establishment of marine protected areas and other effective area-based measures to enhance resilience; implementation of precautionary and ecosystem approaches; ecological restoration; integrated coastal and ocean management and marine spatial planning; and reduction of other human stressors, such as overfishing and pollution. The need for adaptive and science-informed policy responses has been highlighted in the Implementation Plan for the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development 2021-2030.The Research Topic will be a collection of manuscripts emerging primarily from the upcomingIMBeR IMBIZO6 Workshop 3 to showcase the work in progress addressing the proposed Research Topic with a multi-scales and transdisciplinary approach. The Research Topic will also welcome contributions outside the IMBeR IMBIZO 6 Workshop 3 that will address the scope and the themes of this collection.