While affordance detection and Human-Object interaction (HOI) detection tasks are related, the theoretical foundation of affordances makes it clear that the two are distinct. In particular, researchers in affordances make distinctions between J. J. Gibson's traditional definition of an affordance, “the action possibilities” of the object within the environment, and the definition of a telic affordance, or one defined by conventionalized purpose or use. We augment the HICO-DET dataset with annotations for Gibsonian and telic affordances and a subset of the dataset with annotations for the orientation of the humans and objects involved. We then train an adapted Human-Object Interaction (HOI) model and evaluate a pre-trained viewpoint estimation system on this augmented dataset. Our model, AffordanceUPT, is based on a two-stage adaptation of the Unary-Pairwise Transformer (UPT), which we modularize to make affordance detection independent of object detection. Our approach exhibits generalization to new objects and actions, can effectively make the Gibsonian/telic distinction, and shows that this distinction is correlated with features in the data that are not captured by the HOI annotations of the HICO-DET dataset.

In this work, we focus on human-agent interaction where the role of the socially interactive agent is to optimize the amount of information to give to a user. In particular, we developed a dialog manager able to adapt the agent's conversational strategies to the preferences of the user it is interacting with to maximize the user's engagement during the interaction. For this purpose, we train an agent in interaction with a user using the reinforcement learning approach. The engagement of the user is measured using their non-verbal behaviors and turn-taking status. This measured engagement is used in the reward function, which balances the task of the agent (giving information) and its social goal (maintaining the user highly engaged). Agent's dialog acts may have different impact on the user's engagement depending on several factors, such as their personality, interest in the discussion topic, and attitude toward the agent. A subjective study was conducted with 120 participants to measure how third-party observers can perceive the adaptation of our dialog model. The results show that adapting the agent's conversational strategies has an influence on the participants' perception.