Human spaceflight has required space agencies to study and develop exercise countermeasure (CM) strategies to manage the profound, multi-system adaptation of the human body to prolonged microgravity (µG). Future space exploration will present new challenges in terms of adaptation management that will require the attention of both exercise physiologists and operational experts. In the short to medium-term, all exploration missions will be realised using relatively small vehicles/habitats, with some exploration scenarios including surface operations in low (<1G) gravity conditions.
The evolution of CM hardware has allowed modern-day astronauts to return to Earth with, on average, relatively moderate levels µG-induced adaptation of the musculoskeletal (MS) and cardiovascular (CV) systems. However, although the intense use of CM has attenuated many aspects of MS and CV adaptation, on an individual level, there remains wide variation in the magnitude of these changes. Innovations in CM programs have been largely engineering-driven, with new hardware providing capability for new modes of exercise and a wider range of exercise protocols, which, in turn, has facilitated the transfer of traditional, but effective, terrestrial concepts based around high frequency resistance (multiple-set, multiple repetition) and medium-intensity continuous aerobic training (MICT). As a result, International Space Station (ISS) CM specialists have focused their efforts in these domains, taking advantage of hardware innovations as and when they become available. However, terrestrial knowledge in human and exercise physiology has expanded rapidly during the lifetime of the ISS and, consequently, there is potential to optimize current approaches by re-examining terrestrial knowledge and identifying opportunities to implement this knowledge into operational practices.
Current terrestrial knowledge in exercise physiology is the product of a large number of intervention studies in which the variables that contribute to the effects of physical activity (mode, frequency, duration, intensity, recovery) have been controlled and systematically manipulated. However, due to limited opportunities to perform intervention studies in both spaceflight analogues – head-down bed rest (HDBR) being considered the ‘gold standard’ – and spaceflight itself, it will not be possible to systematically investigate the contribution of these factors to the efficacy of in-flight CM. As such, it will be necessary to draw on terrestrial evidence to identify solutions/strategies that may be best suited to the constraints of exploration and prioritise specific solutions/strategies for evaluation in HDBR and in flight.
The aim of this Research Topic is to synthesize relevant terrestrial physiology knowledge and consider how this information might be used to optimize how exercise is used to manage µG adaptation, both now on ISS and during future human space exploration missions. It is hoped that, in time, this optimisation will also contribute the development of effective terrestrial exercise prescriptions. Research areas that will be addressed by this new topic are:
• High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT): effectiveness, safety, comparisons with MICT;
• Strength development and maintenance;
• Exercise and bone health: effectiveness of plyometric exercise;
• Concurrent training: managing the Interference Effect;
• Combined training: CV and MS benefits from one mode of exercise;
• ‘Efficient’ training: reducing time/energy expenditure without compromising effectiveness;
• Individual variation in responses to training (activity) and de-training (in-activity);
• Complementary strategies: countermeasures for MS and CV adaptation that could enhance the effects of exercise CM and/or reduce reliance on them.
Human spaceflight has required space agencies to study and develop exercise countermeasure (CM) strategies to manage the profound, multi-system adaptation of the human body to prolonged microgravity (µG). Future space exploration will present new challenges in terms of adaptation management that will require the attention of both exercise physiologists and operational experts. In the short to medium-term, all exploration missions will be realised using relatively small vehicles/habitats, with some exploration scenarios including surface operations in low (<1G) gravity conditions.
The evolution of CM hardware has allowed modern-day astronauts to return to Earth with, on average, relatively moderate levels µG-induced adaptation of the musculoskeletal (MS) and cardiovascular (CV) systems. However, although the intense use of CM has attenuated many aspects of MS and CV adaptation, on an individual level, there remains wide variation in the magnitude of these changes. Innovations in CM programs have been largely engineering-driven, with new hardware providing capability for new modes of exercise and a wider range of exercise protocols, which, in turn, has facilitated the transfer of traditional, but effective, terrestrial concepts based around high frequency resistance (multiple-set, multiple repetition) and medium-intensity continuous aerobic training (MICT). As a result, International Space Station (ISS) CM specialists have focused their efforts in these domains, taking advantage of hardware innovations as and when they become available. However, terrestrial knowledge in human and exercise physiology has expanded rapidly during the lifetime of the ISS and, consequently, there is potential to optimize current approaches by re-examining terrestrial knowledge and identifying opportunities to implement this knowledge into operational practices.
Current terrestrial knowledge in exercise physiology is the product of a large number of intervention studies in which the variables that contribute to the effects of physical activity (mode, frequency, duration, intensity, recovery) have been controlled and systematically manipulated. However, due to limited opportunities to perform intervention studies in both spaceflight analogues – head-down bed rest (HDBR) being considered the ‘gold standard’ – and spaceflight itself, it will not be possible to systematically investigate the contribution of these factors to the efficacy of in-flight CM. As such, it will be necessary to draw on terrestrial evidence to identify solutions/strategies that may be best suited to the constraints of exploration and prioritise specific solutions/strategies for evaluation in HDBR and in flight.
The aim of this Research Topic is to synthesize relevant terrestrial physiology knowledge and consider how this information might be used to optimize how exercise is used to manage µG adaptation, both now on ISS and during future human space exploration missions. It is hoped that, in time, this optimisation will also contribute the development of effective terrestrial exercise prescriptions. Research areas that will be addressed by this new topic are:
• High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT): effectiveness, safety, comparisons with MICT;
• Strength development and maintenance;
• Exercise and bone health: effectiveness of plyometric exercise;
• Concurrent training: managing the Interference Effect;
• Combined training: CV and MS benefits from one mode of exercise;
• ‘Efficient’ training: reducing time/energy expenditure without compromising effectiveness;
• Individual variation in responses to training (activity) and de-training (in-activity);
• Complementary strategies: countermeasures for MS and CV adaptation that could enhance the effects of exercise CM and/or reduce reliance on them.
