About this Research Topic
As has long been established, narrative and storytelling is a key aspect of human communication: we convey, process and understand information shaped with certain structures—and we will impose those structures in the absence of clear narrative (Douglas 1992; Dahlstrom 2014; Dautenhahn 1999; Boyd 2009). While they have traditionally been regarded as something at odds with scientific rigor, narrative formats have recently been found to enhance lay audiences’ comprehension, interest and engagement with science (Dahlstrom 2014). Thanks to a variety of socio-technical attributes, digital media—such as interactive edu-tainment, user-directed narratives, digital personal storytelling, multimedia journalism, interactive and personalized data visualization, social media streaming, immersive gaming, virtual reality, augmented reality, hypertext fiction, and so on—can become not just an effective antidote to mis/disinformation but also a catalyst to enhance public understanding of and engagement with the health and science issues of our time. Their unique narrative affordances have long been used to convey accurate, engaging and impactful science messages, from Randall Munroe’s xkcd webcomic to Elise Andrew’s social media-originated sci-comm juggernaut IFLScience. Recent efforts with immersive multimedia science journalism, gaming and gamified education have had promising results making inroads against mis/disinformation on the internet (Maertens et al. 2020). By utilizing the most ubiquitous form of media in the modern world, science communication is expanding and amplifying its efficacy, reach and impact.
It is in this context that this Research Topic aims to investigate how digital media affordances—such as human-machine and human-human interactivity, multimedia capacities, dynamic visual appeal, playfulness, personalization, real-time immersion, multilinear narrative, and so on—have been and can be used to effectively communicate health and science issues. We would like to go beyond the current discourse on fake news, mis/disinformation, and online radicalization, which recognizes the malignant effects of digital media on health and science affairs, to refocus on the positive affordances of digital media—both in direct education (e.g., museums, public demonstrations, school settings) and through the media (e.g., news, film, games)—as communication tools and techniques for health and science topics.
The aim of this Research Topic is, therefore, to explore the current state of play, as well as potential future trajectories, of digital narrative and storytelling in the communication of health and science topics. We invite scholarly investigations, including theoretically driven and practice-related research, on any topic relevant to that overall goal. Some potential topics include, but are not limited to, the following:
● How can science and health be effectively communicated through both playful and informative digital narrative and storytelling forms?
● How can information, education and entertainment be integrated into digital narratives about health and science issues?
● How do the socio-technical affordances of digital health and science narrative and storytelling, especially interactivity, affect audience experience, message cohesion, knowledge acquisition, emotional engagement and, ultimately, health/science literacy?
● Can digital narrative and storytelling serve as an antidote to digital health and science mis/disinformation and online science denial more broadly, and in what way?
● How are interactive narratives currently used for health & science communication and what are the social, economic and technological constraints on their production?
Types of manuscripts
● empirical research papers
● practice-led research projects
● conceptual analysis
● brief research reports
Keywords: digital narrative, interactive storytelling, health communication, science communication, science education, science journalism
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.