EDITORIAL
Accepted on 02 Oct 2025
Editorial: Cross-Boundary Disaster Communication: Building Systems Thinking and Breaking Traditional Divisions in the Field
doi 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1707704
- 416 views
- Frontiers in Communication
- Disaster Communications
- Research Topics
- Cross-Boundary Disaster Communication: Building Systems Thinking and Breaking Traditional Divisions in the Field
Cross-Boundary Disaster Communication: Building Systems Thinking and Breaking Traditional Divisions in the Field
5,527
Total downloads
23k
Total views and downloads
Articles
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Published on 03 Jun 2025
Social listening and crowdsourcing in disaster communication—A citizen-centered media and communication consumption perspective
doi 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1568839
- 1,058 views
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Published on 09 May 2025
Bridging the gap in flood risk communication: a comparative study of community and organizational social media posts using natural language processing
doi 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1553746
- 3,017 views
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Published on 08 May 2025
Framing of disaster impact in online news media: a case study from Malawi on flood risk management
doi 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1519357
- 2,409 views
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Published on 07 May 2025
What to do when the earth shakes? DCH or door frames: evaluating generalised risk minimisation guidance
doi 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1537351
- 976 views
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Published on 17 Apr 2025
Can data cross frontiers? Challenges and drivers for cross-border data sharing for disaster risk reduction
doi 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1542966
- 1,570 views
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Published on 08 Apr 2025
Enhancing two-way communication in disaster management in the EU—practical insights
doi 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1557423
- 1,870 views
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Published on 26 Feb 2025
Mobile public warning in Japan and the United States: a sister cities collaboration
doi 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1518729
- 2,374 views
PERSPECTIVE
Published on 30 Jan 2025
Bridging gaps in research and practice for early warning systems: new datasets for public response
doi 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1451800
- 2,217 views
