Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

EDITORIAL article

Front. Plant Sci., 13 October 2025

Sec. Technical Advances in Plant Science

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1715677

This article is part of the Research TopicAgricultural Innovation in the Age of Climate Change: A 4.0 ApproachView all 6 articles

Editorial: Agricultural innovation in the age of climate change: a 4.0 approach

  • 1Istituto di Sistemi e Tecnologie Industriali Intelligenti per il Manifatturiero Avanzato, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR-STIIMA), Bari, Italy
  • 2Botany Department, Science Institute, University of Wyoming, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, United States
  • 3Agenzia Lucana di Sviluppo e Innovazione in Agricultura, Metaponto, Italy
  • 4Dipartimento di Agraria, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy

The global agricultural landscape is constantly evolving, with a focus on identifying solutions to feed an increasingly large population, projected to reach 10 billion people by 2050 (UN, Department of Economic, 2024). This challenge arises at a time of increasing risks posed by the current rate of climate change (Kikstra et al., 2022), leading to an increased frequency of extreme weather events, shifting precipitation patterns, and new pest pressures due to ecosystem changes and adaptations.

In this scenario, Agriculture 4.0 has emerged as a critical adaptation path toward developing resilient, efficient, and sustainable farming practices, characterized by the harmonization of modern technologies such as artificial intelligence (Cardellicchio et al., 2025), collaborative robotics (Reina et al., 2016), big data, and distributed smart sensors (Akhter and Sofi, 2022). This Research Topic, Agricultural Innovation in the Age of Climate Change: A 4.0 Approach, combines five different research areas to showcase the breadth and depth of such innovation.

Robotics and perception in agriculture 4.0

The contributions demonstrate that Agriculture 4.0 is a feasible and effective approach that encompasses various applications and scenarios. Specifically, Wang et al. investigated one of the most relevant and foundational elements of Agriculture 4.0, that is, the advancements in robotics required to enable precision agriculture. This requires overcoming several issues related, for example, to terrain estimation (Vulpi et al., 2021). Specifically, the authors introduced a fuzzy backstepping controller, harmonizing the trailer’s trajectory with the tractor’s, and ensuring higher precision in operations such as seeding and fertilization, thus improving operational costs and overall yield. A complementary contribution involving AI was proposed by Divyanth et al., who proposed a system based on single-stage object detectors to address post-harvest challenges in pathogen detection in potatoes, identifying potato eyes in a high-throughput scenario, and automating a traditionally labor-intensive process for disease management.

Accessibility and user engagement

Another relevant aspect is accessibility to modern technology, which is often a constraint when working with the main users of the proposed advancements: breeders and farmers. To this end, Won et al. demonstrated the potential of using standard, low-cost devices, such as smartphones, for nondestructive crop monitoring. Specifically, the authors established a meaningful correlation between the lettuce leaf color, captured in the RGB color space, and the plant’s fresh weight across different nutritional treatments, thus opening the door to low-cost tools for crop health assessment and yield prediction. In another approach to output optimization, Cao et al. proposed a simulated environment to enhance greenhouse strawberry yields by optimizing the patterns of honeybee pollination. Their work revealed that specific interplanting strategies, along with staggered planting times, can significantly improve cross-pollination and fruit weight by mitigating competition among flowers for pollinators. This demonstrates how numerical models can be used to understand and manage complex biological systems and provide valuable and effective guidance for breeders.

Economics and societal challenges

Finally, Zhang et al. addressed a related issue that can be solved by adopting modern digital solutions. The authors used data analytics and intelligence to address the economic volatility that is inherently built into the agricultural sector, and that is of special interest in dynamic scenarios such as the ones we are currently living in. This research focused on predicting agricultural commodity prices, using a BiLSTM-based hybrid model to provide highly accurate price forecasts for key commodities, including ginger, garlic, pork, and soybean futures. This predictive power can be an incredibly useful asset for stabilizing the market, thus optimizing the supply chain and supporting political decision-makers in their policymaking.

Together, all these different studies paint a compelling picture of what Agriculture 4.0 can offer to the community, highlighting how digital innovation offers a diverse toolkit for addressing long-standing and emerging challenges. The research community operates with a wide range of applications, from soil management to the precise control of field robots, focusing on intelligent automation, yield optimization via accessible devices, simulation-based optimization and adaptation, and the data-driven forecasting of exogenous and economic trends. Therefore, these contributions underscore the transformative potential of Agriculture 4.0 in building a more effective, resilient, and sustainable agricultural landscape, tailored to navigate the challenges and complexities we will face in this century.

Author contributions

AC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. VR: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. FC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the authors and the reviewers for contributing to this Research Topic. We also thank the Editorial Office for their support.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Akhter, R. and Sofi, S. A. (2022). Precision agriculture using IoT data analytics and machine learning. J. King Saud University-Computer Inf. Sci. 34, 5602–5618. doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.05.013

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cardellicchio, A., Renò, V., Cellini, F., Summerer, S., Petrozza, A., and Milella, A. (2025). Incremental learning with domain adaption for tomato plant phenotyping. Smart Agric. Technol. 12, 101324. doi: 10.1016/j.atech.2025.101324

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kikstra, J. S., Nicholls, Z. R., Smith, C. J., Lewis, J., Lamboll, R. D., Byers, E., et al. (2022). The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report WGIII climate assessment of mitigation pathways: from emissions to global temperatures. Geoscientific Model. Dev. 15, 9075–9109. doi: 10.5194/gmd-15-9075-2022

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Reina, G., Milella, A., Rouveure, R., Nielsen, M., Worst, R., and Blas, M. R. (2016). Ambient awareness for agricultural robotic vehicles. Biosyst. Eng. 146, 114–132. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.12.010

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

UN, Department of Economic (2024). World population prospects 2024: summary of results (Stylus Publishing, LLC).

Google Scholar

Vulpi, F., Milella, A., Marani, R., and Reina, G. (2021). Recurrent and convolutional neural networks for deep terrain classification by autonomous robots. J. Terramechanics 96, 119–131. doi: 10.1016/j.jterra.2020.12.002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: precision agriculture, sustainability, deep learning, artificial intelligence, robotics & automation in agriculture

Citation: Cardellicchio A, Renò V, Guadagno CR, Cellini F and Amitrano C (2025) Editorial: Agricultural innovation in the age of climate change: a 4.0 approach. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1715677. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1715677

Received: 29 September 2025; Accepted: 01 October 2025;
Published: 13 October 2025.

Edited and reviewed by:

Ruslan Kalendar, University of Helsinki, Finland

Copyright © 2025 Cardellicchio, Renò, Guadagno, Cellini and Amitrano. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Angelo Cardellicchio, YW5nZWxvLmNhcmRlbGxpY2NoaW9AY25yLml0; Vito Renò, dml0by5yZW5vQGNuci5pdA==; Carmela Rosaria Guadagno, Y2d1YWRhZ25AdXd5by5lZHU=; Francesco Cellini, ZnJhbmNlc2NvLmNlbGxpbmlAYWxzaWEuaXQ=; Chiara Amitrano, Y2hpYXJhLmFtaXRyYW5vQHVuaW5hLml0

ORCID: Angelo Cardellicchio, orcid.org/0000-0003-3313-4817
Vito Renò, orcid.org/0000-0003-1830-4961
Carmela Rosaria Guadagno, orcid.org/0000-0003-1940-0250
Francesco Cellini, orcid.org/0000-0002-8429-9614
Chiara Amitrano, orcid.org/0000-0003-1864-5221

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.