Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Genet., 15 February 2022
Sec. Genomics of Plants and the Phytoecosystem

Corrigendum: Comparative Analysis of Complete Chloroplast Genomes of 13 Species in Epilobium, Circaea, and Chamaenerion and Insights into Phylogenetic Relationships of Onagraceae

Yike Luo&#x;Yike Luo1Jian He&#x;Jian He1Rudan Lyu&#x;Rudan Lyu1Jiamin Xiao&#x;Jiamin Xiao1Wenhe LiWenhe Li1Min YaoMin Yao1Linying PeiLinying Pei2Jin ChengJin Cheng3Jinyu LiJinyu Li4Lei Xie
Lei Xie1*
  • 1School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China
  • 2Beijing Engineering Research Center for Landscape Plant, Beijing Forestry University Forest Science Co. Ltd., Beijing, China
  • 3College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China
  • 4Beijing Institute of Landscape Architecture, Beijing, China

A corrigendum on
Comparative Analysis of Complete Chloroplast Genomes of 13 Species in Epilobium, Circaea, and Chamaenerion and Insights into Phylogenetic Relationships of Onagraceae

by Luo Y., He J., Lyu R., Xiao J., Li W., Yao M., Pei L., Cheng J., Li J. and Xie L. (2021). Front. Genet. 12: 730495. doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.730495

In the original article, there was a mistake in Figure 3 as published. “The number in the IRb region of Circaea cordata needed to be corrected.” The corrected Figure 3 appears below.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Comparison of the LSC, IR, and SSC boundary regions of representative samples the three newly sequenced genera of Onagraceae and Oenothera samples. IR: inverted repeats; LSC: large single copy; SSC: small single copy.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: chloroplast genome, inversion, Onagraceae, phylogeny, RNA editing, biparental inheritance, IR expansion

Citation: Luo Y, He J, Lyu R, Xiao J, Li W, Yao M, Pei L, Cheng J, Li J and Xie L (2022) Corrigendum: Comparative Analysis of Complete Chloroplast Genomes of 13 Species in Epilobium, Circaea, and Chamaenerion and Insights into Phylogenetic Relationships of Onagraceae. Front. Genet. 13:817493. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.817493

Received: 18 November 2021; Accepted: 26 January 2022;
Published: 15 February 2022.

Edited and reviewed by:

Deepmala Sehgal, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Mexico

Copyright © 2022 Luo, He, Lyu, Xiao, Li, Yao, Pei, Cheng, Li and Xie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Lei Xie, xielei@bjfu.edu.cn

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.