Skip to main content

HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article

Front. Genet.
Sec. ELSI in Science and Genetics
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1290658
This article is part of the Research Topic Data governance in African health research: ELSI challenges and solutions View all 12 articles

The open ontology and information society

Provisionally accepted
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    IInformation as the most elusive subject, is central to all forms of thought, governance, economic structure, science, and society. Regulation of information, especially within the healthcare field, is proving to be a difficult task globally, given the lack of a qualitative framework and understanding of the concept and properties of information (or data) itself. The presentation of overall qualitative framework, comprising of a qualitative analysis of information, data and knowledge will be valuable and great assistance in delineating regulatory, ethical, and strategic trajectories. Moreso, this framework provides insights (and answers) regarding: (1) data privacy and protection; (2) delineations between information, data and knowledge, based on the important notion of trust; (3) a structured approach to establishing the necessary conditions for an open society and system, and the maintenance of said openness, based on the work of Karl Popper and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel; (4) an active agent approach which promotes autonomy, freedom, and protects the open society; and (5) a data governance mechanism, based on the work of Friedrich Hayek, which structures the current legal-ethical-financial and social society. This is insightful for questions relating to extent of rights and duties, the extent of biological bodies and freedom, and the structure of relations in distributed networked systems. There is great value offered in this framework, and more-so, it provides critical insights and thoughts about (and uncover the interplay between) academic culture, politics, science, society, and societal decay. Note, that keeping in line with the ideas expressed in this manuscript, such as incorporation of personal experience (thus mending the Kantian and Cartesian gap) a first person perspective will be used, where relevant.

    Keywords: information, Data, governance, Trust, Philosophy

    Received: 07 Sep 2023; Accepted: 02 May 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Naidoo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Meshandren Naidoo, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.