- Centre for Interaction, Development and Diversity, School of Psychology, Sport and Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
While the autism diagnosis emphasizes “deficits” in social communication, the article advances that sensory–movement differences underpin autism through a review of the following sources of evidence. This account critically challenges “autistic regression”, with evidence that sensory–movement features appear by birth as the earliest signs of autism and underlie the behavioral differences used for diagnosis, which may reflect adaptations to inherent differences and misunderstandings from others. Sensory and motor differences are salient to autistic people, but they often go underrecognized by others. They cause cascading effects in infancy on behavior and communication through differences in sensorimotor learning, automatic imitation, eye contact, sensory perception, and interests. The article then explains how sensory processing differences may influence reduced perceptual narrowing, which involves a bottom-up information processing style grounded in the surrounding environment. Furthermore, this bottom-up processing may grow from reduced sensory integration in feedback loops potentially involving the cerebellum of the brain. The article then moves into implications for the widespread consequences of these inherent differences on quality of life. The article closes with implications for autism as a construct (including underestimated empathy and pain), testing the theory, providing sensory-sensitive support and acceptance of autistic people, and applications to diverse autistic people. The theory may apply particularly well to autistic women and girls, autistic people with speech divergence, autistic people with ADHD, and autistic people with co-occurring sensory and motor-related neurodivergences. Throughout the article, the theory also provides clinical, neurological, and experiential evidence for sensory and motor differences as lifelong, challenging the notion of “losing” (an) autism (diagnosis) as instead reflecting (risky and not necessarily “successful”) camouflaging.
Introduction
Non-autistic people's definition of autism as based largely in social behavioral deficits within autistic people overlooks many things, including that neurological differences precede when people meet criteria (Dawson et al., 2023) and persist after some people learn to mask autism (Eigsti et al., 2016). The autism diagnosis is based on accounts by largely non-autistic people, yet only autistic people possess the expertise of direct lived experience, and many autistic people demonstrate enhanced scientifically based understanding of autism as well (Gillespie-Lynch et al., 2017). The diagnosis is defined by behavior, yet autistic people are more likely than non-autistic people to define autism internally (as related to cognition or biology: Gillespie-Lynch et al., 2017). It is defined pathologically on a deficit-only basis, whereas autistic people are more likely to define autism holistically (Gillespie-Lynch et al., 2017). Finally, the emphasis of diagnosis on social communication means it places social dysfunction within individuals, yet anything social happens between people (Kapp, 2013). Instead, the only measure of autistic traits developed in equal partnership with the autistic community recently reported extreme sensory processing and enjoyment of repeated actions as the only universally endorsed parts of autism (Ratto et al., 2023). Similarly, experiences of autistic adults have informed a view of autism as based in a “sensorium” affecting perception generally, with a drive toward relationships but the development of these is affected by others' misunderstanding of their needs (Murray et al., 2023; Milton and Green, 2024). This paper argues that neurologically based sensory–movement differences underpin autism from birth and remain for life, through mechanisms such as reduced perceptual narrowing of repeatedly encountered sensory experiences (Lewkowicz and Ghazanfar, 2009; Hadad and Yashar, 2022), which help explain why autistic people may find comfort in familiarity. This theory challenges notions that people “regress into” or “lose” autism, and has implications for supporting autistic people to leverage their differences and disabilities positively, as socially different rather than deficient.
“Autistic regression” or autistic resilience? Coping with sensory–movement differences
Development is dynamic rather than continuous regression—a “loss of previously acquired skills not caused by brain injury or other traumatic events” (Zhang et al., 2019, p. 4)—is generally part of the human experience, even in infancy (Thelen and Spencer, 1998; Thelen, 2005; Brignell et al., 2017; Zwaigenbaum, 2019). For example, newborns generally have instincts for stepping motions that they seem to lose after a few months, explained because they cannot support the weight of their legs before they learn to walk (Thelen, 1995; Thelen and Fisher, 1982). Evidence and explanation for this come from Esther Thelen's dynamic systems theory (development as emergent and discontinuous in interaction with the environment: Spencer et al., 2006), from which Donnellan et al.'s (2010, 2013) sensory–movement account of autism borrowed. The latter defined autism as involving “sensory movement differences in starting, stopping, executing, combining, and/or switching actions, thoughts, emotions and speech” (Donnellan et al., 2010). It served as the only neurocognitive theory of autism in the first special issue on autism and the neurodiversity concept that featured an array of frontline activists and researchers (https://dsq-sds.org/index.php/dsq/issue/view/43). Inspired by “internal” components of evidence such as autistic people's lived experience and neuroscience, this account recognizes that behaviors may not reflect individuals' intent or may be misunderstood and seeks to practically apply ideas to accommodations for and supportive relationships with autistic people (Leary and Donnellan, 2012; Kapp, 2024). At the same time as recognizing the nuances of development, Donnellan (2008) arguably considered autism—or at least its underlying mechanisms—as present from birth, showing the coordination and timing needed for newborns to interact. Indeed, spontaneous movements in 2-day-old babies predict autism-related behavior in toddlers (Doi et al., 2023). Similarly to relatively recent evidence suggesting infants still have the stepping reflex but may not usually show it because of limited visual control (Barbu-Roth et al., 2015), even autistic infants or toddlers who seem to lose skills may have been autistic all along, especially as seen through differences in integrating sensory perception and movement.
The current empirically grounded framework of autistic people as—as Lady Gaga eloquently put it—“born this way” does not deny the appearance of (often temporary) developmental declines that many autistic people experience. Rather, it suggests that many of the behaviors that become more noticeable serve as coping mechanisms that show resilience in response to challenging (yet often vibrant) sensory inputs. It builds from long-standing evidence that sensory, motor, and general attentional differences (arguably themselves related to visual or eye-movement differences: Bellocchi et al., 2017) emerge as the earliest manifestations of autism (Gliga et al., 2014; Gallagher and Varga, 2015; Sacrey et al., 2015; Tanner and Dounavi, 2021), challenging “social-first” theories that posit differences in socially specific attention, motivation, or cognition cause autism (Rogers, 2009; Johnson, 2014; Falck-Ytter and Bussu, 2023). Indeed, autistic newborns do not show differences in social attention (Karmel et al., 2010; Cleary et al., 2023) but do show behavioral, physiological, and neurological differences related to sensation and movement if not also general attention such as hyperfocus (Cohen et al., 2013; Lucas and Cutler, 2015; Pineda et al., 2015; Miron et al., 2016; Ure et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2019; Cook et al., 2023; Doi et al., 2023; Tsang et al., 2024).
Rapin (1995) advanced the term “autistic regression” in the current sense, noting autism as reflecting differences that emerge over time, while notably singling out any poor motor skills as persistent. Some parents have instead conceived of “autistic regression” as meaning “typically developing” children suddenly acquired autism (Rapin, 1995), such as from environmental exposures like vaccines (Davidovitch et al., 2000). This constitutes one of many areas where parents and scientists have disagreements about the causation of and treatment for autism (Fischbach et al., 2016). Parents' narratives have borne little relationship to evidence from home videos, direct examination of the child in question, and prospective longitudinal research (Ozonoff et al., 2011; Pearson et al., 2018). Parents also often miss subtle early differences or delays (Ozonoff et al., 2010, 2015), which may include sensory and movement differences observable in home videos (Zappella et al., 2015; Paolucci et al., 2023). For example, autistic infants at 6 months may smile at least as much as non-autistic peers, but their smiling may be less contingent on the parents' communicative behaviors (Lambert-Brown et al., 2015). Similarly, early home videos suggest enhanced social responsiveness (Kaufman et al., 2022); overtly diminished early eye contact or responsiveness predicts failing to meet diagnostic criteria for autism (Clifford et al., 2013; Wagner et al., 2018). Instead, research suggests that most autistic people appear to show less normative behavior (e.g., less eye contact, gestures, or speech, or more social withdrawal or repetitive sensorimotor behaviors/“stimming”) in infancy through toddlerhood or early childhood, but that any changes happen gradually (Ozonoff et al., 2015; Bacon et al., 2018; Ozonoff and Iosif, 2019).
A history of early speech regression does not necessarily predict more challenges long term for autistic people than autistic peers without that history either. By middle childhood or at least young adulthood, autistic children with developmental regression histories often gain skills in understanding speech comparable to their autistic peers without that history (Pickles et al., 2022; Prescott and Ellis Weismer, 2022). Furthermore, over adolescence and young adulthood autistic people with a history of early speech regression demonstrated a greater increase in IQ in a population-based study (Simonoff et al., 2020). Nevertheless, while autistic people without intellectual disability but with early speech regression mostly attain fluent speech before adulthood (Gagnon et al., 2021), their production of speech may lag behind their understanding of speech, at least as older children (Pickles et al., 2022). This may hint at potentially greater apraxia of speech among some of them (oral-motor problems in speech production: Tierney et al., 2015; Vashdi et al., 2021; oral-motor problems occur in most autistic people: Maffei et al., 2023). Motor challenges like apraxia of speech may particularly affect non-speaking autistic people (Belmonte et al., 2013; Chenausky et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2024b; Maffei et al., 2024). Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems such as speech-generating devices may help minimally speaking autistic people to gain speech and other communication (Kasari et al., 2014; Almirall et al., 2016; Logan et al., 2017), through their strong visual design and empowerment of fine motor control. Indeed, perceptual strengths in autistic people with speech-onset divergence may help them develop control over their vocal pitch (Sharda et al., 2010), arm (Barbeau et al., 2015; also see Fuentes et al., 2010), and eye (Takarae et al., 2004) movements, contributing to language and sometimes speech gains. They may sometimes also contribute to selective cognitive advantages over other autistic and non-autistic people Kapp and Gudknecht (Under review)1.
Conceptual and empirical foundations of sensory–movement differences: the origins of autism
Sensory and movement differences appear to set autistic people on a divergent path by life's first moments. Piaget's 1930s seminal theory of cognitive development classified a child's first 2 years as the sensorimotor stage (Beilin and Fireman, 1999; Mostofsky and Ewen, 2011; see Bussu et al., 2021). Autistic infants appear to have relatively enhanced sensory if not movement skills followed by what observers commonly call stagnation or declines as autism becomes more apparent as toddlers (Nyström et al., 2018; Bussu et al., 2021; Fish et al., 2021; Tan et al., 2021; also see Wolff et al., 2012, 2015). While Piaget proposed needing mastery before being able to move on to the next stage, autistic people generally can learn new movements similarly as well as non-autistic people, but through different (less intuitive) mechanisms that require more focused attention (Mostofsky and Ewen, 2011; Lidstone and Mostofsky, 2021). Furthermore, autistic people with intellectual disabilities (e.g., associated with conditions linked to rare de novo genetic mutations) do tend to have more motor challenges than other autistic people and non-autistic people (Denisova, 2024). However, these motor differences transcend intellectual challenges (Buja et al., 2018), which may suggest that others may underestimate their cognitive capacities because of their movement-related behavioral or performance difficulties. Indeed, lacking speech for autistic toddlers may only challenge the ability to produce language (at least without access to AAC support), even in those with low cognitive performance (Delehanty et al., 2018). However, for peers with developmental disabilities, limited speech relates to worse visual cognition alongside difficulties producing and understanding language (Delehanty et al., 2018). Moreover, peers with and without developmental disabilities' but not autistic people's ability to understand language may draw from their visual perceptual skills (Delehanty et al., 2018; Hannant, 2018). Even autistic people with minimal expressive language tend to have autism-typical visual perceptual strengths, which may support their non-verbal cognition (Courchesne et al., 2015).
The earliest accounts of autism explicitly included sensory hypersensitivities (Sukhareva, 1925; Ssucharewa, 1927; Kanner, 1943; Asperger, 1944, 1991) and motor challenges (Sukhareva, 1925; Ssucharewa, 1927; Asperger, 1944, 1991), yet diagnostic manuals have usually and always omitted them respectively from autism's historical definitions (Rosen et al., 2021). The latest edition's addition of sensory features helped reduce false negatives without necessarily resulting in false positives (Frazier et al., 2012), suggesting their importance to the hallmark behaviors used for diagnosis. While the autism diagnosis, the phenomenon of regression, and indeed non-autistic people's definitions of autism tend to depend on observable behaviors or skills, autistic people tend to define autism as based on neurocognitive differences (Gillespie-Lynch et al., 2017). These include aspects historically excluded from the autism diagnosis, such as differences in sensory processing, information processing, and emotion regulation (Chamak et al., 2008). Sensory differences have long dominated autistic people's accounts and illustrate their widespread impact (Cesaroni and Garber, 1991; O'Neill and Jones, 1997; Jones et al., 2003; Keane, 2004; Davidson and Henderson, 2010). These narratives tend to emphasize hypersensitivity and difficulties with integration (e.g., simultaneously looking and listening: Robledo et al., 2012; Sibeoni et al., 2022), but they may manifest differently depending on variables such as energy and stress (Robertson and Simmons, 2015). Indeed, autistic people's sensory hyperreactivity and sometimes sensation seeking (which can relate to enhanced enjoyment related to hypersensitivity) show validity in psychometric measurement, unlike hyporeactivity (Williams et al., 2023). The same individual may show heightened or reduced biophysiological responses to the same stimuli, possibly reflecting awareness and ability to tune out aversive sensations (Khan et al., 2015a; Failla et al., 2018) or shutdown due to stress related to sensory overload (Mazefsky et al., 2014; Phung et al., 2021). Nevertheless, lacking the ability to filter out background noise may leave an autistic person unable to understand speech (Schwartz et al., 2020). This may necessitate a lack of distractions or presentation of language or symbols in other modalities (e.g., words on screen or printed: Ostrolenk et al., 2017). Indeed, among sensory modalities the auditory domain may most interrelate with autistic traits, although others (such as the more embodied tactile domain and sense of one's position) also prove important to social communication (Bang and Igelström, 2023).
Hypersensitive autistic people (including those with intellectual disability: Elise et al., 2025) may experience the ability to perceive higher perceptual loads of visual and auditory stimuli (Foss-Feig et al., 2013; Manning et al., 2015; Brinkert and Remington, 2020). This shows evidence in primary sensory cortices (e.g., visual cortex), related to more autistic traits (Ohta et al., 2012). This enhanced perceptual capacity can have benefits but may feel overwhelming (Irvine et al., 2024), in part, because autistic people may also notice more irrelevant stimuli (Tyndall et al., 2018).
Motor differences arguably often form the output to sensory input (especially for more movement-related senses such as vestibular [balance/movement] and proprioceptive [body position]: Ornitz, 1974; Gowen and Hamilton, 2013; Torres et al., 2013a). Indeed—like sensory processing—autistic people describe within-person variability in motor functioning (Gowen et al., 2023). They have detailed how motor difficulties pervasively affect life and require conscious attention or effort (Gowen et al., 2023). Approximately 90% of autistic people may have functionally impactful movement difficulties (Zampella et al., 2021; Bhat, 2023). Autistic people overlap with (Miller et al., 2024) and often struggle more than people with a neurodivergence defined by them (developmental coordination disorder/dyspraxia). They may have more significant differences in early motor development than dyspraxic peers (Bowler et al., 2024) and more difficulties with some movement-based skills such as gestures (Abrams et al., 2024). Compared with dyspraxic peers, autistic children and adolescents display lower motor anticipation (Martel et al., 2024) and body awareness (Hannant et al., 2018) alongside greater sensory hyper-reactivity (Hannant et al., 2018; Harrison et al., 2021; Ringold et al., 2022). Hence, so many autistic people experience motor difficulties that autistic people without a dyspraxia diagnosis tend to experience as so motor challenges (Hannant et al., 2018) and autism as deeply (Cassidy et al., 2016) as those with one, even though abundant evidence suggests motor difficulties help account for autistic people's executive functioning and communication challenges (Bhat, 2023; Estrugo et al., 2024; Gu et al., 2024). Nevertheless, few autistic people receive a formal dyspraxia diagnosis nor support for motor challenges (Cassidy et al., 2016; Zampella et al., 2021; Bhat, 2024).
Furthermore, non-autistic people tend to promptly form negative first impressions of autistic people's movements (Plank et al., 2023). Non-autistic people (e.g., children) particularly may stigmatize averted eye contact even beyond stimming behaviors such as hand-flapping (Sargent and Jaswal, 2022). Autistic children showed enhanced motor and social synchrony (including engagement and social awareness) with one another compared with pairs of non-autistic children (Glass and Yuill, 2024), illustrating the importance of social context for movement and other autistic differences. Compared with autistic peers, non-autistic people may require higher levels of social motor synchrony (Efthimiou et al., 2025) and their own social understanding (Morrison et al., 2020) for interactions with autistic partners to go well, which adversely affects autistic people (Kapp, 2018b; Caron et al., 2022).
In response to inherent differences and social experiences, autistic people develop so-called restrictive and repetitive behaviors and interests (RRBIs) that—according to their own reports and other evidence—help them navigate an often unpredictable, overwhelming world (Wigham et al., 2015). They help provide calming self-regulation and a sense of flow through engaging in interests and pleasurable activities (Collis et al., 2024; Long et al., 2024; Lung et al., 2024).
Sensory and movement differences as underpinning diagnostic criteria for autism and remain across the lifespan
According to an emerging consensus based on empirical evidence, sensory–movement differences (e.g., visual perception as well as eye-movement and motor challenges) in infancy precede discernible communication differences associated with autism (Zhang et al., 2019). At 6 months, only reduced motor control and hand–eye integration distinguish autistic people from non-autistic infant siblings of autistic people, despite both sharing motor differences or delays, and both having more motor challenges than non-autistic peers (LeBarton and Landa, 2019; Zwaigenbaum et al., 2021). Lower hand–eye coordination at 12 months predicts the social communication of autistic toddlers via sensory differences (Capelli et al., 2024). Adding sensory features to autism assessment in infancy helped enable it predict autism earlier than ever (from 6 months: Zwaigenbaum et al., 2021). Similarly, the addition of sensory regulatory behavior to screening among children who meet preliminary criteria for autism at 12 months predicts more specific identification (fewer early false positives) of autism in children at the age of 30 months. It identifies children with greater and more persistent developmental difficulties, particularly in social communication (Ben-Sasson and Carter, 2013). Indeed, fine motor skills (Sutera et al., 2007) and lack of hyper-reactivity to (Troyb et al., 2014) and perception of (see Eigsti and Fein, 2013) sounds as toddlers predicted autistic children appearing non-autistic. Suggesting their cascading effects, these reduced sensorimotor differences in young autistic children were associated with fewer concurrent differences in repetitive behavior (Troyb et al., 2014) and communication (Fein et al., 2013). Similarly, reductions in stimming during toddlerhood predicted autistic people no longer meeting current behavioral diagnostic criteria in young adulthood (Anderson et al., 2014). Conversely, more significant motor challenges as toddlers predicted a major autism screener falsely missing autistic children (Shuster et al., 2024). Greater stimming at 12 months particularly predicts autism (Elison et al., 2014). In autistic toddlers stimming best predicted social communication differences, although all repetitive behaviors contributed to all the social interaction subdomains (Chaxiong et al., 2022).
Sensory sensitivities reduce tolerance of uncertainty in autistic people (see “Reduced perceptual narrowing”), helping explain soothing repetitive behaviors and anxiety (Wigham et al., 2015; Neil et al., 2016; Hwang et al., 2020; Powell et al., 2025). Greater behavioral reductions in social communication differences than in repetitive behaviors for autistic children and adults (Kapp, 2016; Waizbard-Bartov and Miller, 2023) hint further at the foundation and persistence of sensory differences. Autistic people report enduring sensory challenges and that they intensify by older adulthood (Chen et al., 2024a). Similarly, motor difficulties may hardly improve with age except fine motor skills in girls without intellectual disability (Biscaldi et al., 2014; Bhat, 2023). From middle age autistic people's involuntary movement differences tend to diverge further from non-autistic people's movements (Torres et al., 2020).
Sensory and movement differences according to different reporters: often underestimated by non-autistic people
Autistic people's sensory and movement differences are difficult for other people to understand and may help explain why parents may perceive sudden “autistic regression”. Parental reports on their autistic infant's sensory responsiveness uniquely lacked reliability (Del Rosario et al., 2014). Similarly, parental reports on their autistic toddlers' sensory-related behaviors did not align with clinical observation (Ben-Sasson et al., 2007). Brain activity involving auditory, visual, and tactile processing shows a significant association with manifestations of autism or divergences from non-autistic peers even when parent reports or clinical measurements do not (Brandwein et al., 2015; Green et al., 2019). Autistic people's brain activity shows high within-person variability to the same stimuli in these domains (Haigh, 2018), and observers may struggle to interpret autistic people's inconsistent reactions (see Geurts et al., 2008). Fortunately, clinical interviews help parents recognize lifespan sensory differences they often miss (Leekam et al., 2007; Kent, 2014). Trends between parent and child reports on sensory processing suggest that parents may struggle to interpret sensory differences as their children become more aware of social reactions and begin to mask their differences. They show minimal agreement in their reports (MacLennan et al., 2020). Parents tend to report increasing sensory over-responsivity and activity until ages approximately 6 to 9 years and decrease thereafter through adulthood (Kern et al., 2006; Ben-Sasson et al., 2009). However, autistic boys without intellectual disability ages 6 to 18 years reported greater sensory difficulties with increasing age even as their mothers showed the opposite trend, with higher scores by self-report overall (Bitsika et al., 2016). Studies have consistently found the persistence of self-reported sensory sensitivities within adulthood (Crane et al., 2009; Kent, 2014). In contrast to parental reports of a relationship between sensory behaviors and autistic traits in children but not adolescents or adults (Kern et al., 2007), autistic adults have reported sensory and motor behaviors as most interrelated with the rest of autistic traits (Andersen et al., 2011). Similarly, autistic adults without intellectual disability report higher sensory differences and needs than caregivers or support staff of autistic people with intellectual disability report on their behalf (Bradshaw et al., 2024).
Autistic women's and girls' sensitivities may be particularly underrecognized, in part due to greater camouflaging (Lai et al., 2011; Harstad et al., 2023; see Pagán et al., 2024; Taylor et al., 2024). Autistic females have greater sensory sensitivities than autistic males (Kumazaki et al., 2015; Lai et al., 2011; Osório et al., 2021; Kose et al., 2025; Saure et al., 2023), whereas relatively greater motor skills over time (Bhat, 2023) may enable them to mask their autism. Sensory processing difficulties may grow in adulthood, especially for autistic women (Chen et al., 2024a), contributing to distress and chronic illness with increasing age (Grant et al., 2022, 2025; Chen et al., 2024a). They appear to be a primary driver of an autism diagnosis, especially for females (Fry, 2024). However, white, non-Hispanic males with highly educated mothers are disproportionately represented among those with clinician-documented sensory features (Kirby et al., 2022).
Cascading impacts of sensory and movement differences in infancy
All behavior at a basic level stems from movement (Adolph and Berger, 2015), while motor delays tend to grow for autistic people over infancy (West, 2019; Lim et al., 2021). The following marked the earliest predictors of autism in studies that followed up over multiple time points: (a) atypical visual tracking alongside weak arm motor tone at 1 month (Karmel et al., 2010), (b) less advanced visual reception and gross motor skills at 6 months (Estes et al., 2015), and (c) little grabbing at toys or throwing them to the floor in addition to lacking the postural ability to sit on a lap with a straight back also at 6 months (Lemcke et al., 2013). These provide evidence of divergent early perception and action that constrains the ability to explore the environment within the first 6 months of infants later diagnosed with autism: hypotonia (Samango-Sprouse et al., 2015), lack of oral-motor anticipation (Brisson et al., 2012) or ability to stop sucking without support (Lucas and Cutler, 2015), less symmetrical and more basic postures (Esposito et al., 2009), delays in the development and spontaneous initiation of new postures (Nickel et al., 2013), head lags when pulled to sit (Flanagan et al., 2012; also see Bradshaw et al., 2023), greater observation of but less oral and manual engagement with objects (Kaur et al., 2015; Focaroli et al., 2024), increased perceptual sensitivity (Clifford et al., 2013), shorter spontaneous visual fixations to static stimuli (Wass et al., 2015), suspected vision problems such as squinting (Bolton et al., 2012), and atypical general movements (Zappella et al., 2015). They may manifest as less “liveliness” and subtler bids for attention (Wan et al., 2013), and passivity with decreased activity and intensity (Zwaigenbaum et al., 2005; Bolton et al., 2012; Del Rosario et al., 2014).
Infants may already manifest early sensorimotor development of autism (enhanced perception and movement challenges) even before diagnostic instruments recognize them as autistic, through a lack of flexible face scanning (see “Eye contact”) and little motor initiation (also see Bryson et al., 2007). This includes low activity and high perceptual sensitivity at the time infants typically begin to vocalize but nevertheless exhibit average to high social responsiveness in terms of attention to faces of their mothers (Rozga et al., 2011) or examiners (Ozonoff et al., 2010); smiling, cooing, and laughing (Clifford et al., 2013; Del Rosario et al., 2014) alongside enhanced perceptual sensitivity (Clifford et al., 2013); atypical general movements (Zappella et al., 2015); and low activity (Del Rosario et al., 2014). The following may indicate a self-regulatory function of stimming in individuals too sensitive for soothing from touch and who lacked the motor coordination to self-produce the rhythmic movements in early infancy: (a) low activity in socially responsive infants at 6 months that precedes high activity and autism diagnosis at 2 years (Bolton et al., 2012; Del Rosario et al., 2014), and (b) high perceptual sensitivity and apparently typical social responsiveness in infants at 6 months that precedes reduced pleasure from rocking by parents and more negative affect driven by less “cuddliness” in 2-year-old autistic toddlers (Clifford et al., 2013). Indeed, poorer sensory–movement skills in infancy predict autism via difficulties with self-regulation of attention and emotion (Perry et al., 2024). Focused repetitive movements and behaviors may help to self-regulate attention and emotion (Kapp et al., 2019b; see McKinnon et al., 2019). For example, an autistic infant experienced problems with oral motor coordination and muscle tone in the first 6 months of life, and his pattern of tactile and startle sensitivity alongside poor self-regulation predicted problems in social interaction despite early smiling and cooing (Dawson et al., 2000). Similarly, infants sleeping more at 5 months and less at 14 months predicted a diagnosis of autism (Begum-Ali et al., 2023), as the infants became more physically independent and potentially experienced more sensory overload (see “Reduced perceptual narrowing”).
Sensorimotor learning
Autistic people demonstrate lifelong slower movement and related executive functioning that contribute to their manifestations of autism (Cho et al., 2022; Jertberg R. et al., 2024; Wilson et al., 2024). Autistic children's differences in action planning and control become greater with age (Chua et al., 2022). Autistic children's dyspraxia entails poor manual dexterity to command (e.g., gesture), use tools (e.g., control and share objects as in playing), and consciously imitate (Dziuk et al., 2007). These difficulties distinguish autistic children from the motor difficulties of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; MacNeil and Mostofsky, 2012) and even developmental coordination disorder (Kilroy et al., 2022b). Indeed, imitation abilities reflect not only motor skills in autistic children (Vanvuchelen et al., 2007) but also a closer interrelationship between motor and imitation skills than in ADHDers and comparison groups (Biscaldi et al., 2015). Significant challenges in imitating facial movements and hand and finger gestures improve somewhat over time (Biscaldi et al., 2014) but even speaking adults tend to have less accurate imitation and rely on goals to consciously emulate (Wild et al., 2012; see Hamilton, 2008; Edwards, 2014), while robust difficulties with timing of motor performance and movement quality remain (Biscaldi et al., 2014).
Autistic people may learn to move by focusing on their own body both during infancy (e.g., looking at one's lower body and the floor when learning to walk) and well after infancy. Despite early motor delays, autistic people often fare relatively well in learning to walk (Bowler et al., 2024; Wilson et al., 2024) compared with others with significant developmental disabilities (Bishop et al., 2016) and other motor difficulties (Ming et al., 2007). This may occur in part because of attention to their proprioception. For example, autistic infants may shift their attention from eye contact (Jones and Klin, 2013; Rutherford et al., 2015) to their movement and the floor to learn to crawl (see Kretch et al., 2014). A pattern of motor learning and control typical of autistic children involves visual attention to their body's position in space rather than looking outward (Masterton and Biederman, 1983; Morris et al., 2015; Sharer et al., 2016), related to difficulties with imitation and general manifestations of autism (Haswell et al., 2009). This may form an adaptation to differences in visual–motor integration (Linkenauger et al., 2012; Nebel et al., 2016; Lidstone and Mostofsky, 2021) and postural stability (Travers et al., 2013; Lim et al., 2017; Oster and Zhou, 2022) that also relate to challenges participating in many interactions. Others may misperceive why autistic people may need to actively focus on their bodies, as clinicians rated autistic children who had a more accurate sense of body ownership as displaying less empathy (Cascio et al., 2012). Autistic people's sense of their body may require conscious attention, as they may not automatically incorporate proprioceptive feedback (Shafer et al., 2021).
Indeed, a micro-movement model aligned with the sensory–movement theory has found evidence of more variable and random-looking signatures of fluctuations in pointing movements, reflecting a lack of automatic proprioception among autistic people. It contrasts with typical development by preschool age of intuitive proprioception built from experience that enables flexible, timely, and spontaneous gestures (Brincker and Torres, 2013; Torres et al., 2013a,b; also see Simeoli et al., 2019). Gestures that point at objects or hold them help build vocabulary in both autistic and non-autistic children (Özçalişkan et al., 2016). However, gestural divergence uniquely distinguished autistic children from language-impaired and developmentally disabled peers in infancy and toddlerhood (Veness et al., 2012; West et al., 2024). This may reflect weaker manual dexterity in autistic children than in children with language disability even though they experience some motor challenges (McPhillips et al., 2014).
Motor skills help autistic children with minimal speech understand speech and language. They may be the largest contributor to a gap between (higher) understanding than expression of language (Chen et al., 2024b). However, motor problems contributing to a lack of gestures or pointing may also lead to an underestimation of these children's intellectual and communicative abilities (Krueger, 2013; Courchesne et al., 2015; Girard et al., 2022; Kapp, 2023). For example, the children may make clear but unreciprocated bids for communication (Krueger, 2013). Fine motor skills play a role in common routes to joint engagement (Bhat et al., 2011; Jaswal and Akhtar, 2019), which promotes language development with a supportive partner (Adamson et al., 2019). In minimally speaking autistic preschoolers, fine motor skills most strongly predicted expressive language in young adulthood (Bal et al., 2020).
Grasping difficulties may affect speech or communication development. For example, limited fine motor skills contributed to autistic children's lack of (neuro)typical shape bias for word learning (Potrzeba et al., 2015), a unique finding that may occur because of difficulties grasping objects or gesturing. Furthermore, weak handgrip is associated with more obvious communication differences in autistic people across age, regardless of history of “regression”, and across IQ (Kern et al., 2011; Travers et al., 2015). Autistic people tend to have difficulty executing reaching and grasping actions that transact with others' responses to cascade into affecting interactions (Sacrey et al., 2014b). In contrast to gross motor skills' relationship to general language (including understanding) and communication in autistic people (Bedford et al., 2016; Hannant, 2018), poor oral-motor and fine motor skills in people in infancy through early childhood particularly relate to speech production (Iverson and Wozniak, 2007; Gernsbacher et al., 2008a; Belmonte et al., 2013; LeBarton and Iverson, 2013). This is especially the case among autistic people with minimal speech (Chenausky et al., 2019; Butler and Tager-Flusberg, 2023).
Echopraxia and echolalia: Automatic imitation
Autistic people often struggle with volitional but usually not automatic actions, such as eye movements (Minshew et al., 1999), gaze following (Kirchgessner et al., 2015), bimanual lifting (Martineau et al., 2004), locomotion, balance control (Vernazza-Martin et al., 2005), and grip (Stoit et al., 2013). The ability to spontaneously and precisely match another's movements in young autistic children predicts spoken language growth (Stone and Yoder, 2001; Miniscalco et al., 2014).
The typical or high social responsiveness as conventionally understood in infants later diagnosed with autism may partially reflect automatic hyperimitation of others' actions, or echopraxia, in association with more obvious autism and developmental disability. In autistic adults (a) automatic hyperimitation of hands and (b) (on a “theory of mind” task) not pretending that triangles have mental states ironically relates to others' perception of them as lacking in social and emotional reciprocity (Spengler et al., 2010). Indeed, automatic hyperimitation in autistic people especially applies to a greater bias toward copying human over robot hand movements (Bird et al., 2007). Similarly, automatic hyperimitation of fingers relates to more obvious autism (Sowden et al., 2016). Other studies consistently find evidence of at least typical levels of automatic imitation in autistic people (Hamilton et al., 2007; Press et al., 2010; Schunke et al., 2016).
Autistic people's differences in self-other distinction in automatic imitation appear to be at a sensory-motor level (Cracco et al., 2018). Increased within-person sensorimotor variability in autistic individuals challenges higher level integration of information for efficient motor planning and control (Gowen and Hamilton, 2013; Torres et al., 2013a; Fourie et al., 2025). This may contribute to the reduced impact of experience on an implicit sense of one's own actions that most people rely on for quick perception of others' behaviors as in joint attention (c.f. Mundy et al., 2010; Mostofsky and Ewen, 2011; Donnellan et al., 2013). Autistic children of various abilities and support needs demonstrate high responsiveness to adults' imitation of their behavior (Nadel, 2015), as they may raise self- and other awareness and incorporate greater reciprocity from the other (Gernsbacher, 2006). Similarly, when parents synchronize or match their behavior (e.g., mirroring the child's rhythm or pace) in response to their autistic child's, this arguably reflects a form of the adults' imitation of the child, and predicts higher joint engagement and child language (Gulsrud et al., 2016).
Similarly, speech apparently lost may have been echolalia (Clarke, 2019): imitation of another's language (Jaswal and Akhtar, 2019). Speaking single words earlier but later development of more flexible and complex language may reflect echolalia and relates to autistic children appearing to regress (Gagnon et al., 2021). Higher echolalia in response to direct communication relates to poorer adaptive functioning among institutionalized autistic adults with low language (Grossi et al., 2013). Echolalia may help autistic and non-autistic people learn language (Haydock et al., 2024), and almost all autistic children and youth may engage in it (Maes et al., 2024). However, if communication partners regard it as a repetitive behavior (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) rather than a form of communication, they may miss opportunities to connect.
Eye contact
Autistic infants tend to at first make at least as much eye contact as non-autistic peers (Falck-Ytter, 2024); challenges at the oculomotor (eye movement), auditory filtering, and oral motor levels for sensory integration appear most relevant for declines in eye contact in response to speech. Infants later diagnosed with (Young et al., 2009; Jones and Klin, 2013; de Klerk et al., 2014) or who screen positive for (Pineda et al., 2015) autism tend to look at others' eyes at least as much as peers in the first few months, but looking more at the eyes predicts more problems with face recognition (de Klerk et al., 2014), speech (Young et al., 2009; Pineda et al., 2015), and motor (Pineda et al., 2015) abilities. Lack of involuntary drifts of eye movement in newborns who screen positive for autism at the age of 2 years similarly predicts not only worse language but also poorer cognitive and motor development (Pineda et al., 2015). Similarly, in autistic newborns differences in functional connectivity between brain regions related to auditory–motor integration (Perani et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2019, 2020) provide an exceptionally early brain-related sign of autism (Morrel et al., 2023). Speech impairs face scanning in 6-month-old infants later diagnosed with autism (Shic et al., 2014), but at this age, attention to faces often fares in the average range but begins to decline in autistic infants as other make more of it (Jones and Klin, 2013; Rutherford et al., 2015; Gangi et al., 2021). It appears autistic infants turn away to better listen, like autistic adults (Garvey et al., 2024; for autistic children also see Doherty-Sneddon et al., 2012; Falck-Ytter, 2015).
Autistic infants also turn their attention to mouths, arguably to try to integrate speech sounds with lip motion (lip-read: Kapp, 2016), yet they show challenges with sensory integration (Zhou et al., 2025). Autistic people experience lifelong audiovisual challenges (including filtering out background noise) that affect speech perception and far beyond (Feldman et al., 2018; Callejo and Boets, 2023; Choi et al., 2023; Jertberg R. M. et al., 2024). Autistic children continue to need time to turn their attention to mouths to lip-read because of difficulties processing the speech sounds at the same time as a moving face (Newman et al., 2021; Polzer et al., 2024). Lipreading provides helpful lifelong audiovisual integration (see Kapp et al., 2019a; Newman et al., 2021).
Eye contact between caregivers and infants or children is uncommon for both autistic and non-autistic peers and is not required for joint attention between them (Adolph and West, 2022; Yurkovic-Harding et al., 2022; Thorup et al., 2024). Autistic children with hypersensitive perception alongside motor differences may exhibit enhanced covert attention: the ability to see with little eye movement (Gernsbacher et al., 2008b,c). However, the caregiver not understanding this and “seeing the world through their child's eyes” to understand their bids for joint attention, may contribute to why such children often have lower language skills (Amso et al., 2014; see Kapp, 2018b). Some autistic people acquire language (such as the ability to read and write if not speak), regardless of joint attention (Kissine et al., 2023).
Social responsiveness: autonomic differences in sensory perception
Autistic infants' difficulties in processing motion may increasingly (in combination with other developmental demands) challenge their ability to respond to typical social interactions. Autistic infants show differences in global motion processing associated with later language (Nyström et al., 2021; Hardiansyah et al., 2023; Hedenius et al., 2023), paralleling the lifelong challenges autistic people have with processing motion (Van der Hallen et al., 2019). Others' movement (rather than sociality per se) may challenge perception in autistic infants, as unusual neural response to shifts in but not static eye gaze in infants predicts autism diagnosis at the age of 3 years (Elsabbagh et al., 2012). Infant processing parallels neurological differences (Weisberg et al., 2014) and spontaneous attention (Hanley et al., 2013) in how autistic adolescents and young adults process dynamic representations of social stimuli (video clips) but not static images.
Furthermore, autistic infants show differences in global form processing associated with later visual cognition (Nyström et al., 2021; Hedenius et al., 2023), paralleling autistic people's capacities with processing static images and strengths with visual-spatial tasks. Enhanced visual search at 9 months predicts higher autism manifestations at 15 months and 2 years (Gliga et al., 2015), demonstrating developmental continuity with superior visual search related to more obvious autism in autistic children and adolescents (Joseph et al., 2009; Keehn and Joseph, 2016). This group difference primarily occurs for trials with absent goals (Keehn and Joseph, 2016), again suggesting differences in relatively involuntary perceptual processes. Indeed, perceptual peaks in cognition in autistic people do not necessarily relate to their interests but draw from innate processes (Meilleur et al., 2015; Courchesne et al., 2020).
Autistic infants may experience heightened arousal and perception in response to growing sensory and other demands. Greater pupil size in reaction to emotional faces in infant siblings of autistic children at 9 months predicts greater social communication differences at 18 months (Wagner et al., 2016). This finding mirrors an enhanced pupillary reflex to light in infancy, the size of which predicts their autism diagnosis and autistic traits in toddlerhood (Nyström et al., 2018). This reflex declines in the second year around the time “developmental regression” tends to occur (Fish et al., 2021; Tan et al., 2021). While dysregulated pupil dilation for sensory (or attentional) reasons may interfere with this reflex for many autistic children (de Vries et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2022), when autistic youth show an enhanced pupillary light reflex at sensory-perceptual and attentional levels, it relates positively to social cognition performance (with the opposite pattern for non-autistic peers: Bast et al., 2019). This may suggest that enhanced perception can help autistic people perceive non-verbal cues through faces and body language when not too overstimulating. Indeed, allowing more time to process movement (Robertson et al., 2014) such as slowing down the presentation of facial expressions (Gepner et al., 2001, 2021) or offering color filters of autistic people's choice helps them read (words and people: Ludlow et al., 2006, 2012, 2020; Whitaker et al., 2016) or imitate them (Tardif et al., 2007; Lainé et al., 2011).
The auditory modality further demonstrates these basic perceptual processes. It illustrates support for classic theory on autism as arising from physiological overarousal (Hutt et al., 1964) and sensory and motor differences related to the vestibular function of the brainstem (Rimland, 1964; Ornitz, 1974; Ornitz et al., 1985), which continue to accumulate evidence (Delafield-Butt and Trevarthen, 2017; Dadalko and Travers, 2018; Burstein and Geva, 2021). Among the evidence of autism-related auditory hypersensitivity in infancy, only for those with elevated auditory brainstem response as newborns did a higher preference for stimulation at 4 months predicting signs of autism (especially social ones) and difficulty with speech at the age of 3 years. These findings across the three time points predicted an autism diagnosis and more obvious autism (Cohen et al., 2013). Those results parallel prolonged, narrow auditory brainstem responses in autistic newborns (Miron et al., 2016; Torres et al., 2023), and similarly slow responses in autistic children (Rosenhall et al., 2003). They also dovetail with evidence of expanded windows of time for multisensory perception in autistic people (Foss-Feig et al., 2010; Baum et al., 2015) and broader challenges with the timing of processes within autistic people and between them and communication partners (Murat Baldwin et al., 2022).
While attention plays a role in perception, evidence suggests bottom-up processing grounded in the surrounding sensory (and social) environment occurs through relatively automatic processes not necessarily driven by interests (as much as they may add joy to life). An earlier adaptation (Kapp, 2013) of Donnellan et al.'s (2010, 2013) sensory–movement account suggested the importance of the salience network, which integrates external sensory stimuli with one's own bodily, emotional, and mental states (Uddin et al., 2013). Hyperconnectivity in this network in 6-week-old babies recently predicted autism-related behaviors, and greater connectivity with sensory regions related to parent-reported sensory behaviors, within the first year (Tsang et al., 2024). This parallels brain patterns in autistic children (Green S. et al., 2016).
Studies like those suggest greater attention to sensory stimuli (because of distraction, pleasure, or pain) and indeed lack of attentional disengagement may stem from sensory sensitivities beyond eye-movement difficulties. For autistic infants, larger pupil dilation when listening to a nonsocial sound (running water) predicted autism diagnosis and related to “stickier attention” (less shift in gaze), whereas their response to baby-talk did not differ from “comparison groups' response” (Rudling et al., 2022). Various autism-typical features such as a strength in resistance to distraction or difficulty at the level of eye movement control may contribute to hyperfocus in some infants (c.f. Gernsbacher et al., 2008c). A lifelong lack of attentional disengagement often occurs for some autistic people (Keehn et al., 2013; Sacrey et al., 2014a), related to greater hypersensitivity and sensory seeking (Sabatos-DeVito et al., 2016). It also may relate to poor oculomotor control that contributes to language-impaired status among autistic people (Kelly et al., 2013) and may relate to more obvious autism (Ziv et al., 2024). Furthermore, co-occurring ADHD may contribute to difficulties controlling attention (Dupuis et al., 2022).
Interests
For all these reasons and more, autistic people and their communication partners may struggle to understand or interact with one another (particularly those more dissimilar from themselves, Milton, 2012). As described by the autistic-designed monotropism account, when this happens young autistic people might withdraw to immerse in other interests (Murray et al., 2005). Parent memoirs that describe children they perceived as typically developing “regress into” autism shared successes with helping the autistic child immerse in their interests and use them as a learning opportunity (Isaacson, 2009; Barnett, 2013; Suskind, 2014). One might consider encouraging their child's “spark” (passionate interests: Barnett, 2013) a good developmental principle rather than “affinity therapy” (Suskind, 2014), as they can support learning words (Arunachalam et al., 2024) and promote flourishing in education (American Psychiatric Association, 2013; Gunn and Delafield-Butt, 2016), communication and interaction or play (Gunn and Delafield-Butt, 2016; Harrop et al., 2019), and employment (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).
Autistic people's task immersion may also stem in part from movement differences of getting relatively “stuck” in action. It has elements of both strengths in hyperfocus or resistance to distraction (e.g., from goal-based or interest-driven attention: Dupuis et al., 2022; Gernsbacher et al., 2008c) as well as difficulties in initiation and disengagement (Hill and Bird, 2006; Buckle et al., 2021), or a mixture (Russell et al., 2019; Dwyer et al., 2024; Heasman et al., 2024; Rapaport et al., 2024a,b). This area forms part of the sensory–movement account, which also emphasizes the role stress can play (Donnellan et al., 2006).
Bottom-up processing: reduced perceptual narrowing
Autistic people's brains seem to process repeatedly encountered sensory stimuli as relatively “new”. This may relate to both unimodal perceptual strengths (e.g., in the visual and auditory modalities) and reduced integration (Heffler and Oestreicher, 2016). It may form part of a larger pattern of reduced perceptual narrowing in autistic people (Hadad and Yashar, 2022), which requires multisensory integration for frequently encountered stimuli (Lewkowicz and Ghazanfar, 2009; Maurer and Werker, 2014; Schwarzer, 2014). Instead of perceptual narrowing becoming accelerated late in the first year (Lewkowicz, 2014), autistic infants' differences with processing more of their surroundings as uncertain may overwhelm their senses and distress them, resulting in challenges in self-regulation and reduced social approach (Garon et al., 2016).
Autistic people's brains show evidence of compensation while they take in more sensory information. Neural hyperconnectivity at approximately 6 months of age that precedes reduced brain connections in those areas and autism diagnosis (Wolff et al., 2012, 2015; also see Liloia et al., 2024), may indicate transitory neural compensation as the amount of information becomes overwhelming. Similarly, autistic infants show unusually accelerated brain growth in the cerebrum around the time (6 months and especially 1 year) autism starts to become more noticeable (Dawson et al., 2023), and larger brain size in relation to apparent developmental regression (Nordahl et al., 2011). Early accelerated growth of the amygdala (Dawson et al., 2023), the novelty and emotional salience center of the brain, further aligns with the notion that autistic infants (like older autistic people) become less habituated to prior experiences that perceptual narrowing facilitates. Reduced sensory (e.g., visual and auditory) habituation in autistic people relates to more obvious autistic traits (Jamal et al., 2021). Reduced sensory habituation occurs more in autistic than in other neurodivergent people (Merchie and Gomot, 2023).
Reduced perceptual narrowing relates to theory and evidence of autism as involving strengths in bottom-up processing (grounded in the surrounding sensory experiences) or disincline toward or difficulties with top-down processing (filtered by prior experiences and expectations). Historic accounts of autism and more recent evidence suggest autistic toddlers and children may perceive physical details in the environment peers and adults do not notice (Kanner, 1943; Asperger, 1944, 1991; Losh and Capps, 2006; Klin et al., 2009). Autistic people have reduced susceptibility to a variety of optical illusions (Simmons et al., 2009), most directly “inattention blindness” of failing to see something in their visual field (Swettenham et al., 2014). This relates to visual perceptual strengths that distinguish them from others with realistic visual processing (Bölte et al., 2007). Similarly, autistic adults tend to show a visual perceptual style of processing the environment on a case-by-case basis (Johnson et al., 2010; Yechiam et al., 2010; Solomon et al., 2015), and sharper performance for nearby stimuli related to the degree of autistic traits (Robertson et al., 2013). Such tendency toward visual details does not necessarily impair holistic processing, but integration may require conscious attention (Happé and Frith, 2006; Mottron et al., 2006; Koldewyn et al., 2013), time (Van der Hallen et al., 2015) or the presence of global and local cues (Johnson et al., 2010). Realistic visual processing and visual hypersensitivity to complex motion do continue to connect to difficulties with movement (including imitation) and autism manifestations across age and intellectual abilities (Freitag et al., 2008; Price et al., 2012; Cook et al., 2013), challenging the perception of inconsistent stimuli whether of objects or people. As related again to eye contact and face processing (but extending far beyond), autistic children, adolescents, and adults process faces over a large window of time (Stevenson et al., 2016), including reduced habituation in the amygdala (Kleinhans et al., 2009; Swartz et al., 2013; Wiggins et al., 2014; Green et al., 2019). The latter means less calming over time despite repeated exposure, which suggests processing familiar faces as “new” and intense, as supported by studies that include eye-tracking (Dalton et al., 2005; Tottenham et al., 2014; Stuart et al., 2023).
Paradoxically, a bottom-up processing account of autism predicts that sometimes non-autistic people have more resistance to change. Autistic infants may exhibit reduced habituation to frequently heard sounds (Guiraud et al., 2011), which would suggest processing repeatedly encountered words as relatively new and an advantage when presented with a sound outside the pattern. Indeed, 1-year-old infants later diagnosed with autism showed a greater understanding and production of unexpected words when controlling for their lower language skills (Lazenby et al., 2016). This parallels how autistic children's performance when learning a new movement showed less adverse impact than typically developing peers and those with ADHD when presented with an alternative pattern (Gidley Larson and Mostofsky, 2008). Indeed, autistic adults recently performed better in an unpredictable task compared with non-autistic people, contrary to researchers' expectations (Lacroix et al., 2025). Similarly, although autistic adults self-reported lower intuition, they responded more intuitively (Bastan et al., 2024). Research generally finds that autistic people rely more on new evidence than prior experiences when making decisions (Van der Plas et al., 2023), which may enable them to “jump to conclusions” more so than non-autistic peers (Sahuquillo-Leal et al., 2020).
Integrative neuroscience: perception–action decoupling and feedback loops
Such bottom-up processing may itself grow from lifelong reduced sensory integration in feedback loops involving the cerebellum of the brain. Among brain regions, the cerebellum may particularly illuminate autism as a permanent neurodivergence, as it has the most neurons (Fiez and Stoodley, 2024) and evidence for a lifelong (smaller) pattern (Liloia et al., 2024), especially through direct testing in post-mortem studies (Fetit et al., 2021). Therefore, it may best substantiate autistic people's tendency (unlike non-autistic people) to think that only biology causes autism (Kapp et al., 2013). Belief in autism's innateness and neurobiological “hard-wiring” relates to the rejection of the possibility of curing autism (VanDaalen et al., 2025). While this view might reflect biological essentialism (Russell, 2020), growing evidence shows that neurological differences in infancy predict meeting diagnostic criteria for autism (Ayoub et al., 2022; Dawson et al., 2023; Morrel et al., 2023). Those autistic people who manage to engage in tasks typically difficult for autistic people like understanding figurative language (Herringshaw et al., 2016), or apparently no longer meeting current behavioral criteria for autism (Eigsti et al., 2016), may engage more of their brain across hemispheres to do so compared with non-autistic people and other autistic people. This may suggest compensation (or camouflaging) rather than normalization (see Eigsti et al., 2016). Indeed, the brain activity of autistic adolescents and adults who may not necessarily still appear autistic relates to their behavior in early childhood rather than the present (Ecker et al., 2012, 2013); such camouflaging contributed to the allowance of diagnosis of autism by history (American Psychiatric Association, 2013; Kapp and Ne'eman, 2020).
Thus, the cerebellum may help illustrate the relative stability of the underlying autism even as expressed skills may fluctuate. A researcher focused on “regression” into autism emphasized the cerebellum for multisensory feedback loops (Kern, 2002), as does the much different sensory–movement account of autism (Donnellan et al., 2010). The region integrates signals between other brain regions and the sensory systems of the spinal cord for muscular activity, and evidence continues to grow for its roles in perception and social cognition beyond sensorimotor learning and control in autistic people (Rice and Stoodley, 2021; Biswas et al., 2024) and in the general population (Olson et al., 2023; Fiez and Stoodley, 2024).
A smaller cerebellum predicts autism in newborns (Ure et al., 2016) and shows exceptional lifespan stability in lobules VI-VII (Courchesne et al., 2011; Crucitti et al., 2020; Liloia et al., 2024; Mohammad et al., 2024a but see Sussman et al., 2015; Laidi et al., 2022; Klaus et al., 2024). This reduced size relates to the decoupling of perception and action for motor learning (Marko et al., 2015) and reduced motor memory (Neely et al., 2019). It relates to the visibility of autistic traits across domains (D'Mello et al., 2015), such as reduced exploration of the environment alongside greater stimming (Pierce and Courchesne, 2001). A smaller cerebellum applies especially to autistic people with lower daily living skills (Duan et al., 2024), higher support needs (Riva et al., 2013), and a history of speech onset divergence (Kevin et al., 2011) even when matched for IQ as children (D'Mello et al., 2016) and adults (Lai et al., 2015). It distinguishes autism from ADHD and dyslexia (associated with larger volume: Stoodley, 2014) and inversely also intellectual disability (Kaufmann et al., 2003), developmental delay (Webb et al., 2009), and developmental language disorder (Hodge et al., 2010).
The cerebellum in autistics has also shown patterns of high and low connectivity with other brain regions (Stoodley, 2014; Hanaie et al., 2018), which may help classify autism (Yi et al., 2024). These pathways in newborns predict autism, motor, and language challenges (Cook et al., 2023); in autistic infants, they predict sensory responsiveness (Wolff et al., 2017) and social manifestations (Okada et al., 2022). The nerve tracts of the cerebellum in autistic people distinguished it from dyspraxia, related to greater social differences (Kilroy et al., 2022a). In autistic people, the cerebellum has exhibited enhanced connectivity with sensory and motor networks (Khan et al., 2015b; Oldehinkel et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019) that grows over time (Lepping et al., 2022). It also shows reduced connectivity with error monitoring, socioemotional, or language regions (Verly et al., 2014; Arnold Anteraper et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019; Unruh et al., 2023), such as related to social cognition (Igelström et al., 2017) or attention to others' eyes (Laidi et al., 2022). Hyperreactivity to sensory stimuli and involuntary attention explain these cerebellar connectivity patterns that relate to greater manifestations of autism (Lidstone et al., 2021; Alho et al., 2023; Cakar et al., 2024).
The cerebellum also helps account for gender differences among autistic people. It shows unique gender structural differences within different subregions (Supekar and Menon, 2015), with smaller size related to more obvious autism for males and more RRBIs for females (McKinney et al., 2022), and unusual changes in size over time that differ by gender (Sussman et al., 2015). Greater cerebellar activity in autism-associated visual-spatial strengths has been studied more with males (Thérien et al., 2022, 2023). Among males, autistic people uniquely showed higher cerebellar activity during visual-spatial tasks (Manjaly et al., 2007), including as related to faster response times (Thérien et al., 2023; also see Hayes et al., 2018) and higher visual-spatial complexity (Thérien et al., 2022). Nevertheless, opposite patterns of cortical–cerebellar connectivity in autistic females (high) and males (low) may help explain why some studies have failed to find unusual connectivity in mixed-gender samples of autistic people (Smith et al., 2019; Linke et al., 2020; Gaudfernau et al., 2023; Hawks et al., 2023). This might result from greater social camouflaging in autistic females despite their greater sensitivities (Lai et al., 2011; Eigsti et al., 2016).
Contrasting patterns for the connectivity or size of the cerebellum in autistic people who differ by possessing (or not) common co-occurring neurodivergences such as ADHD (Surgent et al., 2024) and depression (Dhar et al., 2024) suggest replications are needed for how the region helps “get a grip” on diversity among autistic people. Furthermore, autistic people's sensory responsiveness may also relate well to other regions such as the brainstem (Surgent et al., 2022), suggesting the need for a whole-brain approach.
Grasping the implications: consequences of sensory differences and social contexts
Sensory and movement differences impact autistic people's daily lives, with often heightened recognition by autistic people. Autistic children have long identified movement-relevant challenges such as low athleticism alongside social differences (Capps et al., 1995; Bauminger et al., 2004; Williamson et al., 2008). Autistic young people and adults have similarly long reported worse or equal physical quality of life than their parents reported, with other domains such as social relationships in the opposite direction (Shipman et al., 2011; Sheldrick et al., 2012; Hong et al., 2016). To the extent that autistic traits impact quality of life (Kim and Bottema-Beutel, 2019), they may impact school achievement and physical health (Oakley et al., 2021). Reactivity to sensory stimuli may have this consequence, as it challenges classroom learning (especially in the auditory domain: Ashburner et al., 2008; Howe and Stagg, 2016), and uniquely predicts both poor physical and psychological health (Lin and Huang, 2019). For example, hypersensitivity challenges supermarket visits (MacLennan et al., 2023), comfortable clothing (Kyriacou et al., 2023), healthy eating (Nimbley, 2024), dental care (McMillion et al., 2021; Chauhan et al., 2024), menstruation (Steward et al., 2020; Fearon et al., 2025), sex (Barnett and Maticka-Tyndale, 2015), childbirth (Gardner et al., 2016), and menopause (Moseley et al., 2020; Karavidas and de Visser, 2022; Brady et al., 2024). Autistic people (especially those assigned female at birth) with less expressive language may struggle to have their needs met and become so physically overwhelmed with pubertal changes that their bodies may at times take hold of them, possibly helping explain the unusual onset in adolescence of epileptic seizures (Rutter and Pickles, 2016) and catatonic motor freezes (Dell'Osso et al., 2022) disproportionately affecting them. Sensory overload may result in uncontrollable meltdowns (Lewis and Stevens, 2023). While arranging environments and routines may reduce overwhelm (Daly et al., 2022), even “autistic space” cannot always resolve competing sensory access needs (Sinclair, 2010).
Moving (further) toward sensitive understanding of autism: underestimated empathy and pain in autistic people
It appears that people have internalized views about autism such that autistic people and their families may endorse stereotypes even where the evidence points to the contrary. Ongoing (mis)conceptions of empathy in autistic people may lead to its under-recognition, even as sensory overstimulation in non-autistic people is long established to positively relate to empathy (Aron and Aron, 1997; Gubler et al., 2024). Autistic people's hypersensitivities significantly overlap with this “highly sensitive person” (HSP) construct, helping account for their tendencies toward introversion and vulnerability to stress (Schwartzman et al., 2015), yet the author may have sought to avoid making an HSP–autism association because of the stigma of diagnoses (Edenroth-Cato and Sjöblom, 2022). Parents tend to under-report their autistic children's demonstrated empathetic responsiveness, in association with more obvious autism (Scheeren et al., 2013). Similarly, autistic adults tend to under-report their own empathy compared with their tested empathic response (Trimmer et al., 2017), although many autistic people report high empathy (Kimber et al., 2024). Similarly, families may under-recognize sensitivity to pain, which forms part of tactile or somatosensory processing (Moore, 2015; Zhang et al., 2021). Parents under-report their autistic children's pain (more so than parents of non-autistic children) even when their children have observable facial expressions displaying it (Nader et al., 2004). Again similarly, autistic youth may under-recognize or under-report their own pain (Duerden et al., 2015).
Moving forward: testing the theory and applications to support for autistic people
This theoretical model raises questions about whether the autism diagnosis adequately explicitly covers sensory and in particular movement (and related) differences when they so often form such a central role in autistic people's experience of autism; arguably, motor challenges merit addition to the diagnostic criteria (Miller et al., 2024). Meanwhile, this account raises concerns about the dangerousness of placing social dysfunction within single people. It also raises issues with the limitations of a behavior-based diagnosis despite the lack of reliable biomarkers (Loth, 2023). It is limited by the scarcity of research on the perspectives of autistic people with intellectual disability (Gibbs et al., 2024). Further participatory research with diverse autistic community members and researchers on autism as a construct and diagnosis would help (Ratto et al., 2023). It also could strengthen measurements and approaches to sensory processing (Nicolaidis et al., 2020; Gunderson et al., 2023; Williams et al., 2024; He et al., 2023), which lacks good measurement even for non-autistic people (Greven et al., 2024).
The theory of autism as a lifelong sensory–movement neurodivergence is testable through prospective longitudinal research on whether sensory, motor, and domain-general differences continue to appear as the earliest signs of autism, especially neurologically from birth. For example, studies may focus on neurological differences in autistic newborns in the cerebellum, such as whether it relates to (a) differences in learning and movement during sleep that predict an autism diagnosis (see Fifer et al., 2010; Denisova and Wolpert, 2024), (b) within-person differences in sensation and movement in autistic people via “idiosyncratic” network connections (see Vakorin et al., 2017), and (c) differences in perceiving (social) action that predict challenges learning higher-order rules like the social “hidden curriculum” (see Balsters et al., 2013; Olson et al., 2023; Myles et al., 2024). Other relevant regions include the somatosensory cortex involved in touch and proprioception, which showed particular potential for distinguishing between autistic and non-autistic children's and adult's brains at rest (Chen et al., 2015). Further fine-grained research on early developmental regression in autistic people may try to distinguish between losing and not showing skills consistent with nuances in “older” autistic children and adults, for example, whether young children who seem to lose access to their speech may still express inner speech (see Alderson-Day and Pearson, 2023). Selective mutism (Muris and Ollendick, 2021) may apply to apparent lost speech or language, which may have prolonged episodes if children struggle to communicate or do not feel comfortable speaking. Early-arising autistic burnout (Raymaker et al., 2020)—if not autistic inertia (difficulties with starting and stopping consistent with the sensory–movement account: Buckle et al., 2021; Donnellan et al., 2006) or even catatonia (Smith et al., 2025)—may account for more general declines (Baggs, 2005).
Longitudinal research might investigate the relationship between “developmental regression” and these forms of pause or regression usually more associated with later development. For example, a measure of autistic traits in adulthood co-produced with autistic people defines within-person variability and the at least temporary loss of skills as part of autism (Ratto et al., 2023). Similarly, after high school or by their 30′s, many autistic people experience declines in daily living skills (Smith et al., 2012; Clarke et al., 2021; Tomaszewski et al., 2025), to which the reduced sensory tolerance in autistic burnout may contribute (Raymaker et al., 2020).
The extent to which subtle early differences reflect a form of “camouflaging” merits further study (Petrolini et al., 2023). Autistic people's brain differences that precede more obvious behavioral differences draw some parallels to people who may no longer appear to meet diagnostic criteria still showing autism-related neurological (Eigsti et al., 2016), cognitive, and experiential (Lai et al., 2011) differences. They may still actively repress hand-flapping (Padawer, 2014) and have distressing sensory differences (Thomas, 2023). This has practical relevance because they are still visibly different (Canale et al., 2024), and subtler autism relates to more risk of victimization (Kapp, 2018b; Libster et al., 2022), especially as they show poor social judgment alongside extreme friendliness and approachability (Orinstein et al., 2015). These phenomena may help explain why autistic people whose diagnoses are removed may not be happier (Pickles et al., 2020).
Sensory-sensitive support for autistic people in and beyond interactions
Sensory and movement difficulties have implications for supporting young autistic children, including slowing down body language (Lainé et al., 2011; Gepner et al., 2022), and giving them color filters that help them read words and people (Ludlow et al., 2012, 2020; Whitaker et al., 2016); encouraging AAC and language (Almirall et al., 2016; Logan et al., 2017), lip-reading (Kapp et al., 2019a; Habayeb et al., 2021; Newman et al., 2021), interactive stimming (Sinclair, 2005; Chen, 2024; Morris et al., 2025); imitating their movements (Nadel, 2015), and taking a more responsive than directive approach when interacting (Kapp, 2018b). However, speech (Chazin et al., 2024; Schuck et al., 2024) and eye contact (Stuart et al., 2023; Garvey et al., 2024) should not necessarily be encouraged.
Future research may explain whether tactile hypersensitivity mediates (or at least moderates) the impacts of developmental interventions adapted from positive parenting programs that encourage parents to follow their child's lead. Tactile processing develops first among sensory systems and differences in it relate to various neurodivergences (Cascio, 2010), with exceptional (among the traditional five modalities) near-universal frequency in young infant siblings of autistic children (Van Etten et al., 2017). Aversion to social touch, whether naturally in the home (Baranek, 1999) or experimentally tested by parents (Mammen et al., 2015), in infants late in the first year predicts autism manifestations and diagnosis. Conversely, seeking touch in infancy reduced the likelihood of showing signs of autism in toddlers, even among infants with reduced neural habituation to tactile input (Piccardi et al., 2021; also see Narvekar et al., 2024). Reduced parental affectionate touch toward autistic infants in response to crying (Esposito and Venuti, 2009) or in interaction (Apicella et al., 2013) may reflect an adaptation, as tactile-hypersensitive autistic children show a defensive behavioral reaction to touch, regardless of whether a person does the touching (Cascio et al., 2016; Riquelme et al., 2016). Quality, reliable relationships may benefit tactile-hypersensitive autistic people (Robledo and Donnellan, 2008, 2016), as autistic people struggle with unexpected touch (whether or not it is social: Cascio et al., 2015; Duerden et al., 2015; Khan et al., 2015a). The particular benefit (vs. comparison peers) of responsive as opposed to directive parenting on positive social engagement in infant siblings of autistic children (Harker et al., 2016) and on language development in autistic toddlers (Baker et al., 2010), across relationship context (parent, teacher, or therapist: Goods et al., 2013; Mohammadzaheri et al., 2014b; Patterson et al., 2014; Pellecchia et al., 2015), may in part reflect less intrusive touch. Indeed, hyper-responsiveness to touch mediated social inhibition and more struggles in groups among institutionalized autistic adults with intellectual disability (Lundqvist, 2015).
Different beliefs about autistic people's development have historically caused anguish among families of autistic people, and threaten to repeat harm if caregivers think of autism as foreign to a child (Broderick and Ne'eman, 2008; Sarrett, 2011). The false belief that cold “refrigerator mothers” cause autism destroyed families and put autistic people in institutions (Kapp, 2022). Ironically, children raised in deprived orphanages (Rutter and Sonuga-Barke, 2010) or adopted after caregiver maltreatment (Green J. et al., 2016) are much more likely to meet behavioral criteria for autism, although leaders in the autism field have described this as “quasi-autism” because of this history and belief in autism as relatively organic (Rutter and Pickles, 2016). Many of those children may have environmentally induced tactile defensiveness from social deprivation (a lack of reliable, calming touch), but their signs of autism decline when adopted into a loving home (Rutter and Pickles, 2016). Similarly, congenitally blind people disproportionately meet diagnostic criteria for autism but many have unusual or subtler presentations that often substantially disappear over time (Hobson and Lee, 2010; Jure et al., 2016), perhaps reflecting learning effective tactile processing through relying on it as blind people often do (Legge et al., 2008; Wan et al., 2010). Autistic children's innate tactile differences may resemble these other neurological or environmental states, but their different cause and function arguably require accommodation.
With the rise of extremely early interventions based on positive parenting models before infants show many signs of autism, the autism field risks returning to a “quasi-refrigerator mother” era (see Kapp, 2018a). These studies have found little impact (McGlade et al., 2023), despite a headline-grabbing study that falsely implied autism could be prevented (Whitehouse et al., 2021; see Dwyer et al., 2021). Many autistic people and parents do not want these or later interventions to try to reduce autistic traits or apply certain behavioral approaches (Bent et al., 2024; Sulek et al., 2024), although many parents do see them as beneficial even for non-autistic children (Washington et al., 2024) and wish for genetic testing because of stigma (Fischbach et al., 2016).
The neurodiversity movement tries to help parents unnecessarily guilt-ridden about the cause of their child's autism accept and support their children to leverage their autism positively and authentically (Kapp, 2022). Its co-founding leader Jim Sinclair encouraged parents to learn their child's language (Sinclair, 1993; Pripas-Kapit, 2020), which has near-universal support in the autism community (Kapp et al., 2013). Autistic people support early diagnosis if it helps parents accept their child (Vanaken, 2023; Riccio et al., 2021). Certainly, parental acceptance of the autism diagnosis and seeing things from the child's perspective helps parents engage with and relate to their child (Kapp, 2018b; Di Renzo et al., 2020). Furthermore, caregivers of autistic infants may not show reduced responsiveness as a group (Wan et al., 2019). They are more likely to be responsive to infants with greater sensory and movement differences (Campi et al., 2024; Ke et al., 2025), perhaps because they recognize signals from sensory hyperresponsiveness.
Applications across autistic people (e.g., non-speaking, multiply neurodivergent, majority world)
While autistic people form a diverse group, this account works best for people who meet all four RRBI criteria of the current autism diagnosis (as well as all three social communication criteria as standard), who likely have sensorimotor differences (Miller et al., 2014; Lord et al., 2015). For autism to be a valid and cohesive construct, its total main components need to meaningfully interrelate for some people. This model also likely works better for autistic people with speech divergence1, who the sensory–movement account has prioritized (Kapp, 2024). Autistic people with genetic syndromes and often co-occurring intellectual disabilities may appear to show less hyperresponsiveness (Hudac et al., 2024), but whether this reflects shutdowns, inertia, or catatonia merits further investigation. The theory applies to multiply neurodivergent autistic people. Autistic people with ADHD may have more sensory differences than autistic people without ADHD, with autism explaining enhanced perception, sensory hyperresponsiveness, and worse motor skills (Skaletski et al., 2024; also see Surgent et al., 2024). Autistic people with and without cerebral palsy overlap in showing patterns for muscular hypotonia yet relatively strong ambulatory skills (Ming et al., 2007; Kirby et al., 2011; Christensen et al., 2014; Bishop et al., 2016). Deaf autistic people overlap with hearing autistic people in showing visual strengths (Maljaars et al., 2011) and possible fine motor weaknesses (Seal and Bonvillian, 1997; Shield and Meier, 2012), alongside underestimated social cognitive competencies (Shield et al., 2016).
Furthermore, the details in these studies reflect a synthesis of mostly Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies (Henrich et al., 2010), reflecting both the state of the autism field and the neurodiversity movement establishment (Nair et al., 2024). Developmental “milestones” and social norms are culturally relative even for motor development (Karasik and Robinson, 2022), and children in societies with strikingly different practices may acquire motor skills and experiences at different times while resulting in similar functioning (Karasik et al., 2023).
Toward understanding, accepting, and supporting autistic people
While no theory can fully explain autism (Happé et al., 2006), this paper has attempted to synthesize how sensory–movement differences may help provide evidence for autism as a lifelong neurodivergence rather than a social communication disorder, even as its manifestations may dramatically change over time. While deep engagement with this literature exceeds the scope of the present paper, the theory is consistent with autistic people not only having an interest in relationships but also more inherent struggles such as sensory overload and misunderstandings from others (especially non-autistic people), which at times challenge engaging with them (Kapp, 2013; Murray et al., 2023). Further understanding (especially neuroscientifically) may increase our ability to provide the recognition and support autistic people need.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
SK: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments
This article is dedicated to Anne M. Donnellan, whose work (including with Martha Leary and David Hill) helped inspire it. Thanks to Carol Greenberg for sharing a personal conversation with me related to this article. The article benefitted from the insightful feedback of Juliette Gudknecht on an earlier draft, the patience of Ruth Kapp, and the comments of the reviewers; thank you.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has accepted speaker fees for understanding autism and supporting autistic people.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
1. ^Kapp, S. K., and Gudknecht, J. (Under review). The Strengths of Speech Divergence in Autistic People: Implications for Assessment and Support.
References
Abrams, G., Jayashankar, A., Kilroy, E., Butera, C., Harrison, L., Ring, P., et al. (2024). Differences in praxis errors in autism spectrum disorder compared to developmental coordination disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 54, 1113–1129. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05858-8
Adamson, L. B., Bakeman, R., Suma, K., and Robins, D. L. (2019). An expanded view of joint attention: skill, engagement, and language in typical development and autism. Child Dev. 90, e1–e18. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12973
Adolph, K. E., and Berger, S. E. (2015). “Physical and motor development,” in Developmental Science (London: Psychology Press), 261–333.
Adolph, K. E., and West, K. L. (2022). Autism: The face value of eye contact. Curr. Biol. 32, R577–R580. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.05.016
Alderson-Day, B., and Pearson, A. (2023). What can neurodiversity tell us about inner speech, and vice versa? A theoretical perspective. Cortex 168, 193–202. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.08.008
Alho, J., Samuelsson, J. G., Khan, S., Mamashli, F., Bharadwaj, H., Losh, A., et al. (2023). Both stronger and weaker cerebro-cerebellar functional connectivity patterns during processing of spoken sentences in autism spectrum disorder. Hum. Brain Mapp. 44, 5810–5827. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26478
Almirall, D., DiStefano, C., Chang, Y. C., Shire, S., Kaiser, A., Lu, X., et al. (2016). Longitudinal effects of adaptive interventions with a speech-generating device in minimally verbal children with ASD. J. Clini. Child Adolesc. Psychol. 45, 442–456. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2016.1138407
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Amso, D., Haas, S., Tenenbaum, E., Markant, J., and Sheinkopf, S. J. (2014). Bottom-up attention orienting in young children with autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 44, 664–673. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1925-5
Andersen, L. M., Näswall, K., Manouilenko, I., Nylander, L., Edgar, J., Ritvo, R. A., et al. (2011). The Swedish version of the ritvo autism and asperger diagnostic scale: revised (RAADS-R). A validation study of a rating scale for adults. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 41, 1635–1645. doi: 10.1007/s10803-011-1191-3
Anderson, D. K., Liang, J. W., and Lord, C. (2014). Predicting young adult outcome among more and less cognitively able individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 55, 485–494. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12178
Apicella, F., Chericoni, N., Costanzo, V., Baldini, S., Billeci, L., Cohen, D., et al. (2013). Reciprocity in interaction: a window on the first year of life in autism. Autism Res. Treat. 2013:705895. doi: 10.1155/2013/705895
Arnold Anteraper, S., Guell, X., D'Mello, A., Joshi, N., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., and Joshi, G. (2019). Disrupted cerebrocerebellar intrinsic functional connectivity in young adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder: a data-driven, whole-brain, high-temporal resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Brain Connect. 9, 48–59. doi: 10.1089/brain.2018.0581
Aron, E. N., and Aron, A. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73:345. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.345
Arunachalam, S., Steele, A., Pelletier, T., and Luyster, R. (2024). Do focused interests support word learning? A study with autistic and nonautistic children. Autism Res. 17, 955–971. doi: 10.1002/aur.3121
Ashburner, J., Ziviani, J., and Rodger, S. (2008). Sensory processing and classroom emotional, behavioral, and educational outcomes in children with autism spectrum disorder. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 62, 564–573. doi: 10.5014/ajot.62.5.564
Asperger, H. (1944). Die autistischen Psychopathen im Kindesalter. Archiv für Psychiatre und Nervenkrankheiten 117, 76–136. doi: 10.1007/BF01837709
Asperger, H. (1991). “'Autistic psychopathy' in childhood,” in Autism and Asperger Syndrome, ed. U. Frith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 37–92.
Ayoub, M. J., Keegan, L., Tager-Flusberg, H., and Gill, S. V. (2022). Neuroimaging techniques as descriptive and diagnostic tools for infants at risk for autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Brain Sci. 12:602. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12050602
Bacon, E. C., Courchesne, E., Barnes, C. C., Cha, D., Pence, S., Schreibman, L., et al. (2018). Rethinking the idea of late autism spectrum disorder onset. Dev. Psychopathol. 30, 553–569. doi: 10.1017/S0954579417001067
Baggs, M. (2005). Help! I Seem to be Getting More Autistic! Available online at: http://web.archive.org/web/20061207172126/http://www.autistics.org/library/more-autistic.html (accessed January 14, 2025).
Baker, J. K., Messinger, D. S., Lyons, K. K., and Grantz, C. J. (2010). A pilot study of maternal sensitivity in the context of emergent autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 40, 988–999. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-0948-4
Bal, V. H., Fok, M., Lord, C., Smith, I. M., Mirenda, P., Szatmari, P., et al. (2020). Predictors of longer-term development of expressive language in two independent longitudinal cohorts of language-delayed preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 61, 826–835. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13117
Balsters, J. H., Whelan, C. D., Robertson, I. H., and Ramnani, N. (2013). Cerebellum and cognition: evidence for the encoding of higher order rules. Cereb. Cortex 23, 1433–1443. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs127
Bang, P., and Igelström, K. (2023). Modality-specific associations between sensory differences and autistic traits. Autism 27, 2158–2172. doi: 10.1177/13623613231154349
Baranek, G. T. (1999). Autism during infancy: a retrospective video analysis of sensory-motor and social behaviors at 9–12 months of age. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 29, 213–224. doi: 10.1023/A:1023080005650
Barbeau, E. B., Meilleur, A. A. S., Zeffiro, T. A., and Mottron, L. (2015). Comparing motor skills in autism spectrum individuals with and without speech delay. Autism Res. 8, 682–693. doi: 10.1002/aur.1483
Barbu-Roth, M., Anderson, D. I., Streeter, R. J., Combrouze, M., Park, J., Schultz, B., et al. (2015). Why does infant stepping disappear and can it be stimulated by optic flow? Child Dev. 86, 441–455. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12305
Barnett, J. P., and Maticka-Tyndale, E. (2015). Qualitative exploration of sexual experiences among adults on the autism spectrum: Implications for sex education. Perspect. Sex. Reprod. Health 47, 171–179. doi: 10.1363/47e5715
Barnett, K. (2013). The Spark: a Mother's Story of Nurturing, Genius, and Autism. New York City: Random House.
Bast, N., Banaschewski, T., Dziobek, I., Brandeis, D., Poustka, L., and Freitag, C. M. (2019). Pupil dilation progression modulates aberrant social cognition in autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 12, 1680–1692. doi: 10.1002/aur.2178
Bastan, E., Beck, S. R., and Surtees, A. D. (2024). Autistic people differ from non-autistic people subjectively, but not objectively in their reasoning. Autism 29, 355–366. doi: 10.1177/13623613241277055
Baum, S. H., Stevenson, R. A., and Wallace, M. T. (2015). Behavioral, perceptual, and neural alterations in sensory and multisensory function in autism spectrum disorder. Prog. Neurobiol. 134, 140–160. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.09.007
Bauminger, N., Shulman, C., and Agam, G. (2004). The link between perceptions of self and of social relationships in high-functioning children with autism. J. Dev. Phys. Disabil. 16, 193–214. doi: 10.1023/B:JODD.0000026616.24896.c8
Bedford, R., Pickles, A., and Lord, C. (2016). Early gross motor skills predict the subsequent development of language in children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 9, 993–1001. doi: 10.1002/aur.1587
Begum-Ali, J., Goss,é, L. K., Mason, L., Pasco, G., Charman, T., Johnson, M. H., et al. (2023). Infant sleep predicts trajectories of social attention and later autism traits. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 64, 1200–1211. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13791
Beilin, H., and Fireman, G. (1999). The foundation of Piaget's theories: mental and physical action. Adv. Child Dev. Behav. 27, 221–246. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2407(08)60140-8
Bellocchi, S., Henry, V., and Baghdadli, A. (2017). Visual attention processes and oculomotor control in autism spectrum disorder: a brief review and future directions. J. Cognit. Educ. Psychol. 16, 77–93. doi: 10.1891/1945-8959.16.1.77
Belmonte, M. K., Saxena-Chandhok, T., Cherian, R., Muneer, R., George, L., and Karanth, P. (2013). Oral motor deficits in speech-impaired children with autism. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 7:47. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00047
Ben-Sasson, A., and Carter, A. S. (2013). The contribution of sensory-regulatory markers to the accuracy of ASD screening at 12 months. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 7, 879–888. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2013.03.006
Ben-Sasson, A., Cermak, S. A., Orsmond, G. I., Tager-Flusberg, H., Carter, A. S., Kadlec, M. B., et al. (2007). Extreme sensory modulation behaviors in toddlers with autism spectrum disorders. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 61, 584–592. doi: 10.5014/ajot.61.5.584
Ben-Sasson, A., Hen, L., Fluss, R., Cermak, S. A., Engel-Yeger, B., and Gal, E. (2009). A metaanalysis of sensory modulation symptoms in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 39, 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10803-008-0593-3
Bent, C. A., Aulich, A., Constantine, C., Fidock, E., Dwyer, P., Green, C., et al. (2024). Autistic and autism community perspectives on infant and family support in the first two years of life: Findings from a community consultation survey. Autism 2024:13623613241262077. doi: 10.1177/13623613241262077
Bhat, A. (2023). Multidimensional motor performance in children with autism mostly remains stable with age and predicts social communication delay, language delay, functional delay, and repetitive behavior severity after accounting for intellectual disability or cognitive delay: a SPARK dataset analysis. Autism Res. 16, 208–229. doi: 10.1002/aur.2870
Bhat, A. N. (2024). Fewer children with autism spectrum disorder with motor challenges receive physical and recreational therapies compared to standard therapies: a SPARK data set analysis. Autism 28, 1161–1174. doi: 10.1177/13623613231193196
Bhat, A. N., Landa, R. J., and Galloway, J. C. C. (2011). Current perspectives on motor functioning in infants, children, and adults with autism spectrum disorders. Phys. Ther. 91, 1116–1129. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100294
Bird, G., Leighton, J., Press, C., and Heyes, C. (2007). Intact automatic imitation of human and robot actions in autism spectrum disorders. Proc. Royal Soc. London B: Biol. Sci. 274, 3027–3031 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1019
Biscaldi, M., Rauh, R., Irion, L., Jung, N. H., Mall, V., Fleischhaker, C., et al. (2014). Deficits in motor abilities and developmental fractionation of imitation performance in high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 23, 599–610. doi: 10.1007/s00787-013-0475-x
Biscaldi, M., Rauh, R., Müller, C., Irion, L., Saville, C. W., Schulz, E., et al. (2015). Identification of neuromotor deficits common to autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and imitation deficits specific to autism spectrum disorder. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 24, 1497–1507. doi: 10.1007/s00787-015-0753-x
Bishop, S. L., Thurm, A., Farmer, C., and Lord, C. (2016). Autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, and delayed walking. Pediatrics 137:2959. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2959
Biswas, M. S., Roy, S. K., Hasan, R., and Pk, M. M. U. (2024). The crucial role of the cerebellum in autism spectrum disorder: neuroimaging, neurobiological, and anatomical insights. Health Sci. Reports 7:e2233. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2233
Bitsika, V., Sharpley, C. F., and Mills, R. (2016). Disagreement between mothers' and their sons' with an ASD on ratings of Sensory Features. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 22, 10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2015.09.005
Bölte, S., Holtmann, M., Poustka, F., Scheurich, A., and Schmidt, L. (2007). Gestalt perception and local-global processing in high-functioning autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 37, 1493–1150 doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0231-x
Bolton, P. F., Golding, J., Emond, A., and Steer, C. D. (2012). Autism spectrum disorder and autistic traits in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children: precursors and early signs. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 51, 249–260. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.12.009
Bowler, A., Arichi, T., Austerberry, C., Fearon, P., and Ronald, A. (2024). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations between motor milestone timing and motor development in neurodevelopmental conditions. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 167:105825. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105825
Bradshaw, J., Pringle, J., Milton, D., and Beadle-Brown, J. (2024). A comparison of the sensory needs of autistic adults with and without intellectual disabilities: a short report. J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 49, 115–119. doi: 10.3109/13668250.2023.2231696
Bradshaw, J., Shi, D., Federico, A., Klaiman, C., and Saulnier, C. (2023). The pull-to-sit task: examining infant postural development in autism Spectrum disorder. J. Pediatr. 253, 225–231. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.09.047
Brady, M. J., Jenkins, C. A., Gamble-Turner, J. M., Moseley, R. L., Janse van Rensburg, M., and Matthews, R. J. (2024). “A perfect storm”: autistic experiences of menopause and midlife. Autism 28, 1405–1418. doi: 10.1177/13623613241244548
Brandwein, A. B., Foxe, J. J., Butler, J. S., Frey, H. P., Bates, J. C., Shulman, L. H., et al. (2015). Neurophysiological indices of atypical auditory processing and multisensory integration are associated with symptom severity in autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 45, 230–244. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2212-9
Brignell, A., Williams, K., Prior, M., Donath, S., Reilly, S., Bavin, E. L., et al. (2017). Parent-reported patterns of loss and gain in communication in 1-to 2-year-old children are not unique to autism spectrum disorder. Autism 21, 344–356. doi: 10.1177/1362361316644729
Brincker, M., and Torres, E. B. (2013). Noise from the periphery in autism. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 7:34. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00034
Brinkert, J., and Remington, A. (2020). Making sense of the perceptual capacities in autistic and non-autistic adults. Autism 24, 1795–1804. doi: 10.1177/1362361320922640
Brisson, J., Warreyn, P., Serres, J., Foussier, S., and Adrien-Louis, J. (2012). Motor anticipation failure in infants with autism: a retrospective analysis of feeding situations. Autism 16, 420–429. doi: 10.1177/1362361311423385
Broderick, A. A., and Ne'eman, A. (2008). Autism as metaphor: narrative and counter-narrative. Int. J. Inclusive Educ. 12, 459–476. doi: 10.1080/13603110802377490
Bryson, S. E., Zwaigenbaum, L., Brian, J., Roberts, W., Szatmari, P., Rombough, V., et al. (2007). A prospective case series of high-risk infants who developed autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 37, 12–24. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0328-2
Buckle, K. L., Leadbitter, K., Poliakoff, E., and Gowen, E. (2021). “No way out except from external intervention”: First-hand accounts of autistic inertia. Front. Psychol. 12:631596. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631596
Buja, A., Volfovsky, N., Krieger, A. M., Lord, C., Lash, A. E., Wigler, M., et al. (2018). Damaging de novo mutations diminish motor skills in children on the autism spectrum. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 115, E1859–E1866. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715427115
Burstein, O., and Geva, R. (2021). The brainstem-informed autism framework: early life neurobehavioral markers. Front. Integrat. Neurosci. 15:759614. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2021.759614
Bussu, G., Llera, A., Jones, E. J., Tye, C., Charman, T., Johnson, M. H., et al. (2021). Uncovering neurodevelopmental paths to autism spectrum disorder through an integrated analysis of developmental measures and neural sensitivity to faces. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 46, E34–E43. doi: 10.1503/jpn.190148
Butler, L. K., and Tager-Flusberg, H. (2023). Fine motor skill and expressive language in minimally verbal and verbal school-aged autistic children. Autism Res. 16, 630–641. doi: 10.1002/aur.2883
Cakar, M. E., Okada, N. J., Cummings, K. K., Jung, J., Bookheimer, S. Y., Dapretto, M., et al. (2024). Functional connectivity of the sensorimotor cerebellum in autism: associations with sensory over-responsivity. Front. Psychiatry 15:1337921. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1337921
Callejo, D. R., and Boets, B. (2023). A systematic review on speech-in-noise perception in autism. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 154:105406. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105406
Campi, E., Choi, E., Chen, Y. J., Holland, C. M., Bristol, S., Sideris, J., et al. (2024). Sensory reactivity of infants at elevated likelihood of autism and associations with caregiver responsiveness. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 54, 270–279. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05764-z
Canale, R. R., Larson, C., Thomas, R. P., Barton, M., Fein, D., and Eigsti, I. M. (2024). Investigating frank autism: clinician initial impressions and autism characteristics. Mol. Autism 15:48. doi: 10.1186/s13229-024-00627-z
Capelli, E., Crippa, A., Riboldi, E. M., Beretta, C., Siri, E., Cassa, M., et al. (2024). Prospective interrelation between sensory sensitivity and fine motor skills during the first 18 months predicts later autistic features. Dev. Sci. 28:e13573. doi: 10.1111/desc.13573
Capps, L., Sigman, M., and Yirmiya, N. (1995). Self-competence and emotional understanding in high-functioning children with autism. Dev. Psychopathol. 7, 137–149.
Caron, V., Jeanneret, N., Giroux, M., Guerrero, L., Ouimet, M., Forgeot d'Arc, B., et al. (2022). Sociocultural context and autistics' quality of life: a comparison between Québec and France. Autism 26, 900–913. doi: 10.1017/S0954579400006386
Cascio, C., Loring, W. A., and Schauder, K. (2016). Self-reported pleasantness ratings and examiner-coded defensiveness in response to touch in children with ASD: effects of stimulus material and bodily location. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 46, 1528–1537. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1961-1
Cascio, C. J. (2010). Somatosensory processing in neurodevelopmental disorders. J. Neurodev. Disord. 2:62. doi: 10.1007/s11689-010-9046-3
Cascio, C. J., Foss-Feig, J. H., Burnette, C. P., Heacock, J. L., and Cosby, A. A. (2012). The rubber hand illusion in children with autism spectrum disorders: delayed influence of combined tactile and visual input on proprioception. Autism 16, 406–419. doi: 10.1177/1362361311430404
Cascio, C. J., Gu, C., Schauder, K. B., Key, A. P., and Yoder, P. (2015). Somatosensory event-related potentials and association with tactile behavioral responsiveness patterns in children with ASD. Brain Topogr. 28, 895–903. doi: 10.1007/s10548-015-0439-1
Cassidy, S., Hannant, P., Tavassoli, T., Allison, C., Smith, P., and Baron-Cohen, S. (2016). Dyspraxia and autistic traits in adults with and without autism spectrum conditions. Mol. Autism 7, 1–6. doi: 10.1186/s13229-016-0112-x
Cesaroni, L., and Garber, M. (1991). Exploring the experience of autism through first hand accounts. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 21, 303–313. doi: 10.1007/BF02207327
Chamak, B., Bonniau, B., Jaunay, E., and Cohen, D. (2008). What can we learn about autism from autistic persons? Psychother. Psychosom. 77, 271–279. doi: 10.1159/000140086
Chauhan, A., Leadbitter, K., Gray-Burrows, K. A., Vinall-Collier, K., Pickles, N., Baker, S. R., et al. (2024). An ‘explosion in the mouth': the oral health experiences of autistic children. Autism 29, 627–641. doi: 10.1177/13623613241288628
Chaxiong, P., Burrows, C., Botteron, K. N., Dager, S. R., Estes, A. M., Hazlett, H. C., et al. (2022). Relations of restricted and repetitive behaviors to social skills in toddlers with autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 52, 1423–1434. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05014-8
Chazin, K. T., Ledford, J. R., Wilson-Moses, J. M., Rajaraman, A., and Juárez, A. P. (2024). Centering autistic perspectives: social acceptability of goals, learning contexts, and procedures for young autistic children. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 55, 812–831. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06242-4
Chen, C. P., Keown, C. L., Jahedi, A., Nair, A., Pflieger, M. E., Bailey, B. A., et al. (2015). Diagnostic classification of intrinsic functional connectivity highlights somatosensory, default mode, and visual regions in autism. NeuroImage: Clini. 8, 238–245. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.04.002
Chen, R. S. (2024). Bridging the gap: fostering interactive stimming between non-speaking autistic children and their parents. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 18:1374882. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2024.1374882
Chen, Y., Jenkins, C. A., Charlton, R. A., Happé, F., Mandy, W., and Stewart, G. R. (2024a). “Utterly overwhelming”—a mixed-methods exploration of sensory processing differences and mental health experiences in middle-aged and older autistic adults. Autism Adulth. doi: 10.1089/aut.2024.0031
Chen, Y., Siles, B., and Tager-Flusberg, H. (2024b). Receptive language and receptive-expressive discrepancy in minimally verbal autistic children and adolescents. Autism Res. 17, 381–394. doi: 10.1002/aur.3079
Chenausky, K., Brignell, A., Morgan, A., and Tager-Flusberg, H. (2019). Motor speech impairment predicts expressive language in minimally verbal, but not low verbal, individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Dev. Lang. Impairm. 4:2396941519856333. doi: 10.1177/2396941519856333
Cho, A. B., Otte, K., Baskow, I., Ehlen, F., Maslahati, T., Mansow-Model, S., et al. (2022). Motor signature of autism spectrum disorder in adults without intellectual impairment. Sci. Rep. 12:7670. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10760-5
Choi, D., Yeung, H. H., and Werker, J. F. (2023). Sensorimotor foundations of speech perception in infancy. Trends Cogn. Sci. 27, 773–784. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.05.007
Christensen, D., Van Naarden Braun, K., Doernberg, N. S., Maenner, M. J., Arneson, C. L., Durkin, M. S., et al. (2014). Prevalence of cerebral palsy, co-occurring autism spectrum disorders, and motor functioning–Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, USA, 2008. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 56, 59–65. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12268
Chua, Y. W., Lu, S. C., Anzulewicz, A., Sobota, K., Tachtatzis, C., Andonovic, I., et al. (2022). Developmental differences in the prospective organisation of goal-directed movement between children with autism and typically developing children: A smart tablet serious game study. Dev. Sci. 25:e13195. doi: 10.1111/desc.13195
Clarke, E. B., McCauley, J. B., and Lord, C. (2021). Post–high school daily living skills in autism spectrum disorder. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 60, 978–985. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.11.008
Clarke, K. A. (2019). A review of language regression in autism spectrum disorder and the role of language theories: towards explanation. Autism Dev. Lang. Impairm. 4:2396941519889227. doi: 10.1177/2396941519889227
Cleary, D. B., Maybery, M. T., Green, C., and Whitehouse, A. J. (2023). The first six months of life: a systematic review of early markers associated with later autism. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 152:105304. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105304
Clifford, S. M., Hudry, K., Elsabbagh, M., Charman, T., Johnson, M. H., and Basis Team (2013). Temperament in the first 2 years of life in infants at high-risk for autism spectrum disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 43, 673–686. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1612-y
Cohen, I. L., Gardner, J. M., Karmel, B. Z., Phan, H. T., Kittler, P., Gomez, T. R., et al. (2013). Neonatal brainstem function and 4-month arousal-modulated attention are jointly associated with autism. Autism Res. 6, 11–22. doi: 10.1002/aur.1259
Collis, E., Dark, E., Russell, A., and Brosnan, M. (2024). Self-report of restricted repetitive behaviors in autistic adults: a systematic review. Autism Adulth. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0111
Cook, J. L., Blakemore, S. J., and Press, C. (2013). Atypical basic movement kinematics in autism spectrum conditions. Brain 136, 2816–2824 doi: 10.1093/brain/awt208
Cook, K. M., De Asis-Cruz, J., Kim, J. H., Basu, S. K., Andescavage, N., Murnick, J., et al. (2023). Experience of early-life pain in premature infants is associated with atypical cerebellar development and later neurodevelopmental deficits. BMC Med. 21:435. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03141-w
Courchesne, E., Campbell, K., and Solso, S. (2011). Brain growth across the life span in autism: age-specific changes in anatomical pathology. Brain Res. 1380, 138–145.
Courchesne, V., Langlois, V., Gregoire, P., St-Denis, A., Bouvet, L., Ostrolenk, A., et al. (2020). Interests and strengths in autism, useful but misunderstood: a pragmatic case-study. Front. Psychol. 11:569339. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569339
Courchesne, V., Meilleur, A. A. S., Poulin-Lord, M. P., Dawson, M., and Soulières, I. (2015). Autistic children at risk of being underestimated: school-based pilot study of a strength-informed assessment. Mol. Autism 6, 1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13229-015-0006-3
Cracco, E., Bardi, L., Desmet, C., Genschow, O., Rigoni, D., De Coster, L., et al. (2018). Automatic imitation: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 144:453. doi: 10.1037/bul0000143
Crane, L., Goddard, L., and Pring, L. (2009). Sensory processing in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Autism 13, 215–228. doi: 10.1177/1362361309103794
Crucitti, J., Hyde, C., Enticott, P. G., and Stokes, M. A. (2020). Are vermal lobules VI–VII smaller in autism spectrum disorder? Cerebellum 19, 617–628. doi: 10.1007/s12311-020-01143-5
Dadalko, O. I., and Travers, B. G. (2018). Evidence for brainstem contributions to autism spectrum disorders. Front. Integrative Neurosci. 12:47. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2018.00047
Dalton, K. M., Nacewicz, B. M., Johnstone, T., Schaefer, H. S., Gernsbacher, M. A., Goldsmith, H. H., et al. (2005). Gaze fixation and the neural circuitry of face processing in autism. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 519–526. doi: 10.1038/nn1421
Daly, G., Jackson, J., and Lynch, H. (2022). Family life and autistic children with sensory processing differences: a qualitative evidence synthesis of occupational participation. Front. Psychol. 13:940478. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.940478
Davidovitch, M., Glick, L., Holtzman, G., Tirosh, E., and Safir, M. P. (2000). Developmental regression in autism: maternal perception. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 30, 113–119. doi: 10.1023/A:1005403421141
Davidson, J., and Henderson, V. L. (2010). ‘Travel in parallel with us for a while': sensory geographies of autism. Can. Geographer 54, 462–475. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0064.2010.00309.x
Dawson, G., Osterling, J., Meltzoff, A. N., and Kuhl, P. (2000). Case study of the development of an infant with autism from birth to two years of age. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 21, 299–313. doi: 10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00042-8
Dawson, G., Rieder, A. D., and Johnson, M. H. (2023). Prediction of autism in infants: progress and challenges. Lancet Neurol. 22, 244–254. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00407-0
de Klerk, C. C., Gliga, T., Charman, T., Johnson, M. H., and Basis Team (2014). Face engagement during infancy predicts later face recognition ability in younger siblings of children with autism. Dev. Sci. 17, 596–611. doi: 10.1111/desc.12141
de Vries, L., Fouquaet, I., Boets, B., Naulaers, G., and Steyaert, J. (2021). Autism spectrum disorder and pupillometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 120, 479–508. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.09.032
Del Rosario, M., Gillespie-Lynch, K., Johnson, S., Sigman, M., and Hutman, T. (2014). Parent-reported temperament trajectories among infant siblings of children with autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 44, 381–393. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1876-x
Delafield-Butt, J., and Trevarthen, C. (2017). “On the brainstem origin of autism: Disruption to movements of the primary self,” in Autism: The Movement-Sensing Perspective (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press), 119–138.
Delehanty, A. D., Stronach, S., Guthrie, W., Slate, E., and Wetherby, A. M. (2018). Verbal and nonverbal outcomes of toddlers with and without autism spectrum disorder, language delay, and global developmental delay. Autism Dev. Lang. Impairm. 3:2396941518764764. doi: 10.1177/2396941518764764
Dell'Osso, L., Amatori, G., Massimetti, G., Nardi, B., Gravina, D., Benedetti, F., et al. (2022). Investigating the relationship between autistic traits and symptoms and Catatonia Spectrum. Eur. Psychiatry 65:e81. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2334
Denisova, K. (2024). Neurobiology of cognitive abilities in early childhood autism. JCPP Adv. 4:e12214. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12214
Denisova, K., and Wolpert, D. M. (2024). Sensorimotor variability distinguishes early features of cognition in toddlers with autism. Iscience 27:110685. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110685
Dhar, D., Chaturvedi, M., Sehwag, S., Malhotra, C., Saraf, C., and Chakrabarty, M. (2024). Gray matter volume correlates of co-occurring depression in autism spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 27:110685.
Di Renzo, M., Guerriero, V., Zavattini, G. C., Petrillo, M., Racinaro, L., and Bianchi di Castelbianco, F. (2020). Parental attunement, insightfulness, and acceptance of child diagnosis in parents of children with autism: Clinical implications. Front. Psychol. 11:1849. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01849
D'Mello, A. M., Crocetti, D., Mostofsky, S. H., and Stoodley, C. J. (2015). Cerebellar gray matter and lobular volumes correlate with core autism symptoms. NeuroImage: Clini. 7, 631–639. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.02.007
D'Mello, A. M., Moore, D. M., Crocetti, D., Mostofsky, S. H., and Stoodley, C. J. (2016). Cerebellar gray matter differentiates children with early language delay in autism. Autism Res. 9, 1191–1204. doi: 10.1002/aur.1622
Doherty-Sneddon, G., Riby, D. M., and Whittle, L. (2012). Gaze aversion as a cognitive load management strategy in autism spectrum disorder and Williams syndrome. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 53, 420–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02481.x
Doi, H., Furui, A., Ueda, R., Shimatani, K., Yamamoto, M., Sakurai, K., et al. (2023). Spatiotemporal patterns of spontaneous movement in neonates are significantly linked to risk of autism spectrum disorders at 18 months old. Sci. Rep. 13:13869. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40368-2
Donnellan, A. (2008). “Rethinking autism,” in Autism: Work with Me, Not on Me. San Diego, CA: University of San Diego, 23.
Donnellan, A. M., Hill, D. A., and Leary, M. R. (2010). Rethinking autism: implications of sensory and movement differences. Disabil. Stud. Quart. 30:1060. doi: 10.18061/dsq.v30i1.1060
Donnellan, A. M., Hill, D. A., and Leary, M. R. (2013). Rethinking autism: implications of sensory and movement differences for understanding and support. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 6:124. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00124
Donnellan, A. M., Leary, M. R., and Robledo, J. P. (2006).”I can't get started: Stress and the role of movement differences in people with autism,” in Stress and Coping in Autism, eds. M. G. Baron, J. Groden, G. Groden, and L. Lipsitt (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 205–245.
Duan, K., Eyler, L., Pierce, K., Lombardo, M. V., Datko, M., Hagler, D. J., et al. (2024). Differences in regional brain structure in toddlers with autism are related to future language outcomes. Nat. Commun. 15:5075. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48952-4
Duerden, E. G., Taylor, M. J., Lee, M., McGrath, P. A., Davis, K. D., and Roberts, S. W. (2015). Decreased sensitivity to thermal stimuli in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: relation to symptomatology and cognitive ability. J. Pain 16, 463–471. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.02.001
Dupuis, A., Mudiyanselage, P., Burton, C. L., Arnold, P. D., Crosbie, J., and Schachar, R. J. (2022). Hyperfocus or flow? Attentional strengths in autism spectrum disorder. Front. Psychiatry 13:886692. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.886692
Dwyer, P., Harrington, L., and Gurba, A. (2021). “About that study on “preventing” autism diagnoses, and how autism researchers can do better”, in Thinking Person's Guide to Autism. Available online at: https://thinkingautismguide.com/2021/10/on-study-about-preventing-autism-diagnoses.html (accessed 13 January, 2025)
Dwyer, P., Williams, Z. J., Lawson, W. B., and Rivera, S. M. (2024). A trans-diagnostic investigation of attention, hyper-focus, and monotropism in autism, attention dysregulation hyperactivity development, and the general population. Neurodiversity 2:27546330241237883. doi: 10.1177/27546330241237883
Dziuk, M. A., Larson, J. G., Apostu, A., Mahone, E. M., Denckla, M. B., and Mostofsky, S. H. (2007). Dyspraxia in autism: association with motor, social, and communicative deficits. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 49, 734–739. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00734.x
Ecker, C., Ginestet, C., Feng, Y., Johnston, P., Lombardo, M. V., Lai, M. C., et al. (2013). Brain surface anatomy in adults with autism: the relationship between surface area, cortical thickness, and autistic symptoms. JAMA Psychiatry 70, 59–70. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.265
Ecker, C., Suckling, J., Deoni, S. C., Lombardo, M. V., Bullmore, E. T., Baron-Cohen, S., et al. (2012). Brain anatomy and its relationship to behavior in adults with autism spectrum disorder: a multicenter magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 69, 195–209. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1251
Edenroth-Cato, F., and Sjöblom, B. (2022). Biosociality in online interactions: youths' positioning of the highly sensitive person category. Young 30, 80–96. doi: 10.1177/11033088211015815
Edwards, L. A. (2014). A Meta-Analysis of Imitation Abilities in Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorders. Autism Res. 7, 363–380. doi: 10.1002/aur.1379
Efthimiou, T. N., Wilks, C. E., Foster, S., Dodd, M., Sasson, N. J., Ropar, D., et al. (2025). Social motor synchrony and interactive rapport in autistic, non-autistic, and mixed-neurotype dyads. Autism. doi: 10.1177/13623613251319585
Eigsti, I. M., and Fein, D. A. (2013). More is less: pitch discrimination and language delays in children with optimal outcomes from autism. Autism Res. 6, 605–613. doi: 10.1002/aur.1324
Eigsti, I. M., Stevens, M. C., Schultz, R. T., Barton, M., Kelley, E., Naigles, L., et al. (2016). Language comprehension and brain function in individuals with an optimal outcome from autism. NeuroImage: Clini. 10, 182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.11.014
Elise, F., Irvine, B., Brinkert, J., Hamilton, C., Farran, E. K., Milne, E., et al. (2025). Perceptual experiences of autistic people with an intellectual disability and people with Williams Syndrome: a reflexive thematic analysis. J. Appl. Res. Intellectual Disabil. 38:e13326. doi: 10.1111/jar.13326
Elison, J. T., Wolff, J. J., Reznick, J. S., Botteron, K. N., Estes, A. M., Gu, H., et al. (2014). Repetitive behavior in 12-month-olds later classified with autism spectrum disorder. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 53, 1216–1224.
Elsabbagh, M., Mercure, E., Hudry, K., Chandler, S., Pasco, G., Charman, T., et al. (2012). Infant neural sensitivity to dynamic eye gaze is associated with later emerging autism. Curr. Biol. 22, 338–342. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.056
Esposito, G., and Venuti, P. (2009). Comparative analysis of crying in children with autism, developmental delays, and typical development. Focus Autism Other Dev. Disabl. 24, 240–247. doi: 10.1177/1088357609336449
Esposito, G., Venuti, P., Maestro, S., and Muratori, F. (2009). An exploration of symmetry in early autism spectrum disorders: analysis of lying. Brain Dev. 31, 131–138. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2008.04.005
Estes, A., Zwaigenbaum, L., Gu, H., St. John, T., Paterson, S., Elison, J. T., et al. (2015). Behavioral, cognitive, and adaptive development in infants with autism spectrum disorder in the first 2 years of life. J. Neurodev. Disord. 7, 1–10. doi: 10.1186/s11689-015-9117-6
Estrugo, Y., Bar Yehuda, S., and Bauminger-Zviely, N. (2024). Motor, cognitive, and socio-cognitive mechanisms explaining social skills in autism and typical development. Autism Res. doi: 10.1002/aur.3215
Failla, M. D., Moana-Filho, E. J., Essick, G. K., Baranek, G. T., Rogers, B. P., and Cascio, C. J. (2018). Initially intact neural responses to pain in autism are diminished during sustained pain. Autism 22, 669–683. doi: 10.1177/1362361317696043
Falck-Ytter, T. (2015). Gaze performance during face-to-face communication: a live eye tracking study of typical children and children with autism. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 17, 78–85. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2015.06.007
Falck-Ytter, T. (2024). The breakdown of social looking. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 161:105689. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105689
Falck-Ytter, T., and Bussu, G. (2023). The sensory-first account of autism. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 153:105405. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105405
Fearon, B., Pearson, A., and Kapp, S. K. (2025). Exploring the social and emotional impact of puberty and adolescence on Autistic people assigned female at birth. Autism Adulthood. doi: 10.1089/aut.2024.0298
Fein, D., Barton, M., Eigsti, I. M., Kelley, E., Naigles, L., Schultz, R. T., et al. (2013). Optimal outcome in individuals with a history of autism. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 54, 195–205. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12037
Feldman, J. I., Dunham, K., Cassidy, M., Wallace, M. T., Liu, Y., and Woynaroski, T. G. (2018). Audiovisual multisensory integration in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 95, 220–234. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.09.020
Fetit, R., Hillary, R. F., Price, D. J., and Lawrie, S. M. (2021). The neuropathology of autism: a systematic review of post-mortem studies of autism and related disorders. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 129, 35–62. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.07.014
Fiez, J. A., and Stoodley, C. J. (2024). Small but mighty: ten myths and misunderstandings about the cerebellum. Neurobiol. Lang. 5, 628–634. doi: 10.1162/nol_e_00152
Fifer, W. P., Byrd, D. L., Kaku, M., Eigsti, I. M., Isler, J. R., Grose-Fifer, J., et al. (2010). Newborn infants learn during sleep. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 107, 10320–10323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005061107
Fischbach, R. L., Harris, M. J., Ballan, M. S., Fischbach, G. D., and Link, B. G. (2016). Is there concordance in attitudes and beliefs between parents and scientists about autism spectrum disorder? Autism 20, 353–363. doi: 10.1177/1362361315585310
Fish, L. A., Nyström, P., Gliga, T., Gui, A., Begum Ali, J., Mason, L., et al. (2021). Development of the pupillary light reflex from 9 to 24 mfonths: association with common autism spectrum disorder (ASD) genetic liability and 3-year ASD diagnosis. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 62, 1308–1319. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13518
Flanagan, J. E., Landa, R., Bhat, A., and Bauman, M. (2012). Head lag in infants at risk for autism: a preliminary study. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 66, 577–585. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2012.004192
Focaroli, V., Taffoni, F., Velardi, A., Caravale, B., and Keller, F. (2024). Object exploration and manipulation in infants at typical vs. elevated likelihood for ASD: a review. Children 11:825. doi: 10.3390/children11070825
Foss-Feig, J. H., Kwakye, L. D., Cascio, C. J., Burnette, C. P., Kadivar, H., Stone, W. L., et al. (2010). An extended multisensory temporal binding window in autism spectrum disorders. Exp. Brain Res. 203, 381–389. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2240-4
Foss-Feig, J. H., Tadin, D., Schauder, K. B., and Cascio, C. J. (2013). A substantial and unexpected enhancement of motion perception in autism. J. Neurosci. 33, 8243–8249. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1608-12.2013
Fourie, E., Lu, S. C., Delafield-Butt, J., and Rivera, S. M. (2025). Motor control adherence to the two-thirds power law differs in autistic development. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 55, 873–890. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06240-6
Frazier, T. W., Youngstrom, E. A., Speer, L., Embacher, R., Law, P., Constantino, J., et al. (2012). Validation of proposed DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorder. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 51, 28–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.09.021
Freitag, C. M., Konrad, C., Häberlen, M., Kleser, C., von Gontard, A., Reith, W., et al. (2008). Perception of biological motion in autism spectrum disorders. Neuropsychologia 46, 1480–1494. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.025
Fry, R. (2024). Debate: ‘Neurodiversity'–has it outrun its usefulness? Child Adolesc. Ment. Health 29, 314–315. doi: 10.1111/camh.12684
Fuentes, C. T., Mostofsky, S. H., and Bastian, A. J. (2010). Perceptual reasoning predicts handwriting impairments in adolescents with autism. Neurology 75, 1825–1829. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181fd633d
Gagnon, D., Zeribi, A., Douard, É., Courchesne, V., Rodríguez-Herreros, B., Huguet, G., et al. (2021). Bayonet-shaped language development in autism with regression: a retrospective study. Mol. Autism 12:35. doi: 10.1186/s13229-021-00444-8
Gallagher, S., and Varga, S. (2015). Conceptual issues in autism spectrum disorders. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 28, 127–132. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000142
Gangi, D. N., Boterberg, S., Schwichtenberg, A. J., Solis, E., Young, G. S., Iosif, A. M., et al. (2021). Declining gaze to faces in infants developing autism spectrum disorder: evidence from two independent cohorts. Child Dev. 92, e285–e295. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13471
Gardner, M., Suplee, P. D., Bloch, J., and Lecks, K. (2016). Exploratory study of childbearing experiences of women with Asperger syndrome. Nurs. Women's Health 20, 28–37. doi: 10.1016/j.nwh.2015.12.001
Garon, N., Zwaigenbaum, L., Bryson, S., Smith, I. M., Brian, J., Roncadin, C., et al. (2016). Temperament and its association with autism symptoms in a high-risk population. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 44, 757–769. doi: 10.1007/s10802-015-0064-1
Garvey, A., Ryan, C., and Murphy, M. (2024). Deliberate and self-conscious adaptation of eye-contact by autistic adults. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06296-4
Gaudfernau, F., Lefebvre, A., Engemann, D. A., Pedoux, A., Bánki, A., Baillin, F., et al. (2023). Cortico-Cerebellar neurodynamics during social interaction in Autism Spectrum Disorders. NeuroImage: Clini. 39:103465. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103465
Gepner, B., Charrier, A., Arciszewski, T., and Tardif, C. (2022). Slowness therapy for children with autism spectrum disorder: a blind longitudinal randomized controlled study. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 52, 3102–3115. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05183-6
Gepner, B., Deruelle, C., and Grynfeltt, S. (2001). Motion and emotion: A novel approach to the study of face processing by young autistic children. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 31, 37–45. doi: 10.1023/A:1005609629218
Gepner, B., Godde, A., Charrier, A., Carvalho, N., and Tardif, C. (2021). Reducing facial dynamics' speed during speech enhances attention to mouth in children with autism spectrum disorder: An eye-tracking study. Dev. Psychopathol. 33, 1006–1015. doi: 10.1017/S0954579420000292
Gernsbacher, M. A., Sauer, E. A., Geye, H. M., Schweigert, E. K., and Hill Goldsmith, H. (2008a). Infant and toddler oral-and manual-motor skills predict later speech fluency in autism. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 49, 43–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01820.x
Gernsbacher, M. A., Stevenson, J. L., Khandakar, S., and Goldsmith, H. H. (2008b). Autistics' atypical joint attention: policy implications and empirical nuance. Child Dev. Perspect. 2, 49–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00041.x
Gernsbacher, M. A., Stevenson, J. L., Khandakar, S., and Goldsmith, H. H. (2008c). Why does joint attention look atypical in autism? Child Dev. Perspect. 2, 38–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00039.x
Geurts, H. M., Grasman, R. P., Verté, S., Oosterlaan, J., Roeyers, H., van Kammen, S. M., et al. (2008). Intra-individual variability in ADHD, autism spectrum disorders and Tourette's syndrome. Neuropsychologia 46, 3030–3041. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.013
Gibbs, V., Cai, R. Y., Love, A., Edwards, C., and Al Ansari, M. (2024). Unheard voices: a systematic literature review of studies using self-report methods to gather the perspectives of autistic adults with intellectual disability. Autism Adulth. doi: 10.1089/aut.2024.0272
Gidley Larson, J. C., and Mostofsky, S. H. (2008). Evidence that the pattern of visuomotor sequence learning is altered in children with autism. Autism Res. 1, 341–353. doi: 10.1002/aur.54
Gillespie-Lynch, K., Kapp, S. K., Brooks, P. J., Pickens, J., and Schwartzman, B. (2017). Whose expertise is it? Evidence for autistic adults as critical autism experts. Front. Psychol. 8:438. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00438
Girard, D., Courchesne, V., Degré-Pelletier, J., Letendre, C., and Soulières, I. (2022). Assessing global developmental delay across instruments in minimally verbal preschool autistic children: the importance of a multi-method and multi-informant approach. Autism Res. 15, 103–116. doi: 10.1002/aur.2630
Glass, D., and Yuill, N. (2024). Moving together: social motor synchrony in autistic peer partners depends on partner and activity type. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 54, 2874–2890. doi: 10.1007/s10803-023-05917-8
Gliga, T., Bedford, R., Charman, T., Johnson, M. H., Baron-Cohen, S., Bolton, P., et al. (2015). Enhanced visual search in infancy predicts emerging autism symptoms. Curr. Biol. 25, 1727–1730. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.011
Gliga, T., Jones, E. J. H., Bedford, R., Charman, T., and Johnson, M. H. (2014). From early markers to neuro-developmental mechanisms of autism. Dev. Rev. 34, 189–207. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2014.05.003
Goods, K. S., Ishijima, E., Chang, Y. C., and Kasari, C. (2013). Preschool based JASPER intervention in minimally verbal children with autism: pilot RCT. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 43, 1050–1056. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1644-3
Gowen, E., Earley, L., Waheed, A., and Poliakoff, E. (2023). From “one big clumsy mess” to “a fundamental part of my character.” Autistic adults' experiences of motor coordination. PLoS ONE 18:e0286753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286753
Gowen, E., and Hamilton, A. (2013). Motor abilities in autism: a review using a computational context. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 43, 323–344. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1574-0
Grant, S., Norton, S., and Hoekstra, R. A. (2025). Central sensitivity symptoms and autistic traits in autistic and non-autistic adults. Autism Res. doi: 10.1002/aur.3297
Grant, S., Norton, S., Weiland, R. F., Scheeren, A. M., Begeer, S., and Hoekstra, R. A. (2022). Autism and chronic ill health: an observational study of symptoms and diagnoses of central sensitivity syndromes in autistic adults. Mol. Autism 13:7. doi: 10.1186/s13229-022-00486-6
Green, J., Leadbitter, K., Kay, C., and Sharma, K. (2016). Autism spectrum disorder in children adopted after early care breakdown. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 46, 1392–1402. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2680-6
Green, S. A., Hernandez, L., Bookheimer, S. Y., and Dapretto, M. (2016). Salience network connectivity in autism is related to brain and behavioral markers of sensory overresponsivity. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 55, 618–626. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.04.013
Green, S. A., Hernandez, L., Lawrence, K. E., Liu, J., Tsang, T., Yeargin, J., et al. (2019). Distinct patterns of neural habituation and generalization in children and adolescents with autism with low and high sensory overresponsivity. Am. J. Psychiatry 176, 1010–1020. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.18121333
Greven, C. U., Trupp, M. D., Homberg, J. R., and Slagter, H. A. (2024). Sensory Processing Sensitivity: Theory, Evidence and Directions. Dover, PA: OSF Preprints.
Grossi, D., Marcone, R., Cinquegrana, T., and Gallucci, M. (2013). On the differential nature of induced and incidental echolalia in autism. J. Intellect. Disab. Res. 57, 903–912. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01579.x
Gu, T., Jin, C., Lin, L., Wang, X., Li, X., Jing, J., et al. (2024). The relationship between executive function and the association of motor coordination difficulties and social communication deficits in autistic children. Front. Psychiatry 15:1363406. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1363406
Gubler, D. A., Janelt, T., Roth, M., Schlegel, K., Guggisberg, J., and Troche, S. J. (2024). The DOES Scale: Measuring sensory processing sensitivity as a trait constellation. J. Pers. Assess. 107, 205–220. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2405536
Guiraud, J. A., Kushnerenko, E., Tomalski, P., Davies, K., Ribeiro, H., Johnson, M. H., et al. (2011). Differential habituation to repeated sounds in infants at high risk for autism. Neuroreport 22, 845–849. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834c0bec
Gulsrud, A. C., Hellemann, G., Shire, S., and Kasari, C. (2016). Isolating active ingredients in a parent-mediated social communication intervention for toddlers with autism spectrum disorder. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 57, 606–613. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12481
Gunderson, J., Worthley, E., Byiers, B., Symons, F., and Wolff, J. (2023). Self and caregiver report measurement of sensory features in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review of psychometric properties. J. Neurodev. Disord. 15:5. doi: 10.1186/s11689-022-09473-7
Gunn, K. C., and Delafield-Butt, J. T. (2016). Teaching children with autism spectrum disorder with restricted interests: a review of evidence for best practice. Rev. Educ. Res. 86, 408–430. doi: 10.3102/0034654315604027
Habayeb, S., Tsang, T., Saulnier, C., Klaiman, C., Jones, W., Klin, A., et al. (2021). Visual traces of language acquisition in toddlers with autism spectrum disorder during the second year of life. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 51, 2519–2530. doi: 10.1007/s10803-020-04730-x
Hadad, B. S., and Yashar, A. (2022). Sensory perception in autism: What can we learn? Annual Rev. Vision Sci. 8, 239–264. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-093020-035217
Haigh, S. M. (2018). Variable sensory perception in autism. Eur. J. Neurosci. 47, 602–609. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13601
Hamilton, A. F. D. C. (2008). Emulation and mimicry for social interaction: a theoretical approach to imitation in autism. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 61, 101–115. doi: 10.1080/17470210701508798
Hamilton, A. F. D. C., Brindley, R. M., and Frith, U. (2007). Imitation and action understanding in autistic spectrum disorders: how valid is the hypothesis of a deficit in the mirror neuron system? Neuropsychologia 45, 1859–1868. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.022
Hanaie, R., Mohri, I., Kagitani-Shimono, K., Tachibana, M., Matsuzaki, J., Hirata, I., et al. (2018). Aberrant cerebellar–cerebral functional connectivity in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 12:454. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00454
Hanley, M., McPhillips, M., Mulhern, G., and Riby, D. M. (2013). Spontaneous attention to faces in Asperger syndrome using ecologically valid static stimuli. Autism 17, 754–761. doi: 10.1177/1362361312456746
Hannant, P. (2018). Receptive language is associated with visual perception in typically developing children and sensorimotor skills in autism spectrum conditions. Hum. Mov. Sci. 58, 297–306. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.03.005
Hannant, P., Cassidy, S., Van de Weyer, R., and Mooncey, S. (2018). Sensory and motor differences in autism spectrum conditions and developmental coordination disorder in children: a cross-syndrome study. Hum. Mov. Sci. 58, 108–118. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.01.010
Happé, F., and Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 36, 5–25. doi: 10.1007/s10803-005-0039-0
Happé, F., Ronald, A., and Plomin, R. (2006). Time to give up on a single explanation for autism. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 1218–1220. doi: 10.1038/nn1770
Hardiansyah, I., Nyström, P., Taylor, M. J., Bölte, S., Ronald, A., and Falck-Ytter, T. (2023). Global motion processing in infants' visual cortex and the emergence of autism. Commun. Biol. 6:339. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04707-3
Harker, C. M., Ibanez, L. V., Nguyen, T. P., Messinger, D. S., and Stone, W. L. (2016). The effect of parenting style on social smiling in infants at high and low risk for ASD. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 46, 2399–2407. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2772-y
Harrison, L. A., Kats, A., Kilroy, E., Butera, C., Jayashankar, A., Keles, U., et al. (2021). Motor and sensory features successfully decode autism spectrum disorder and combine with the original RDoC framework to boost diagnostic classification. Sci. Rep. 11:7839. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87455-w
Harrop, C., Amsbary, J., Towner-Wright, S., Reichow, B., and Boyd, B. A. (2019). That's what I like: The use of circumscribed interests within interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. A systematic review. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 57, 63–86. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2018.09.008
Harstad, E., Hanson, E., Brewster, S. J., DePillis, R., Milliken, A. L., Aberbach, G., et al. (2023). Persistence of autism spectrum disorder from early childhood through school age. JAMA Pediatr. 177, 1197–1205. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.4003
Haswell, C. C., Izawa, J., Dowell, L. R., Mostofsky, S. H., and Shadmehr, R. (2009). Representation of internal models of action in the autistic brain. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 970–972. doi: 10.1038/nn.2356
Hawks, Z. W., Todorov, A., Marrus, N., Nishino, T., Talovic, M., Nebel, M. B., et al. (2023). A prospective evaluation of infant cerebellar-cerebral functional connectivity in relation to behavioral development in autism spectrum disorder. Biol. Psychiatry Global Open Sci. 3, 149–161. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.12.004
Haydock, A., Harrison, L., Baldwin, K., and Leadbitter, K. (2024). Embracing gestalt language development as a fundamental neurodiversity-affirmative practice. Autism 28, 1055–1059. doi: 10.1177/13623613241234598
Hayes, S. J., Andrew, M., Foster, N. C., Elliott, D., Gowen, E., and Bennett, S. J. (2018). Sensorimotor learning and associated visual perception are intact but unrelated in autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 11, 296–304. doi: 10.1002/aur.1882
He, J. L., Williams, Z. J., Harris, A., Powell, H., Schaaf, R., Tavassoli, T., et al. (2023). A working taxonomy for describing the sensory differences of autism. Mol. Autism 14, 15.
Heasman, B., Williams, G., Charura, D., Hamilton, L. G., Milton, D., and Murray, F. (2024). Towards autistic flow theory: a non-pathologising conceptual approach. J. Theory Soc. Behav. 54, 469–497. doi: 10.1111/jtsb.12427
Hedenius, M., Hardiansyah, I., and Falck-Ytter, T. (2023). Visual global processing and subsequent verbal and non-verbal development: an EEG study of infants at elevated versus low likelihood for autism spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 53, 3700–3709. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05470-w
Heffler, K. F., and Oestreicher, L. M. (2016). Causation model of autism: Audiovisual brain specialization in infancy competes with social brain networks. Med. Hypotheses 91, 114–122. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2015.06.019
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., and Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 61–83. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
Herringshaw, A. J., Ammons, C. J., DeRamus, T. P., and Kana, R. K. (2016). Hemispheric differences in language processing in autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Autism Res. 9, 1046–1057. doi: 10.1002/aur.1599
Hill, E. L., and Bird, C. M. (2006). Executive processes in Asperger syndrome: patterns of performance in a multiple case series. Neuropsychologia 44, 2822–2835. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.007
Hobson, R., and Lee, A. (2010). Reversible autism among congenitally blind children? A controlled follow-up study. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 51, 1235–1241. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02274.x
Hodge, S. M., Makris, N., Kennedy, D. N., Caviness Jr, V. S., Howard, J., McGrath, L., et al. (2010). Cerebellum, language, and cognition in autism and specific language impairment. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 40, 300–316. doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0872-7
Hong, J., Bishop-Fitzpatrick, L., Smith, L. E., Greenberg, J. S., and Mailick, M. R. (2016). Factors associated with subjective quality of life of adults with autism spectrum disorder: Self-report versus maternal reports. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 46, 1368–1378. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2678-0
Howe, F. E., and Stagg, S. D. (2016). How sensory experiences affect adolescents with an autistic spectrum condition within the classroom. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 46, 1656–1668. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2693-1
Hudac, C. M., Friedman, N. R., Ward, V. R., Estreicher, R. E., Dorsey, G. C., Bernier, R. A., et al. (2024). Characterizing sensory phenotypes of subgroups with a known genetic etiology pertaining to diagnoses of autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 54, 2386–2401. doi: 10.1007/s10803-023-05897-9
Hutt, C., Hutt, S. J., Lee, D., and Ounsted, C. (1964). Arousal and childhood autism. Nature 204, 908–909. doi: 10.1038/204908a0
Hwang, Y. I., Arnold, S., Srasuebkul, P., and Trollor, J. (2020). Understanding anxiety in adults on the autism spectrum: an investigation of its relationship with intolerance of uncertainty, sensory sensitivities and repetitive behaviours. Autism 24, 411–422. doi: 10.1177/1362361319868907
Igelström, K. M., Webb, T. W., and Graziano, M. S. (2017). Functional connectivity between the temporoparietal cortex and cerebellum in autism spectrum disorder. Cereb. Cortex 27, 2617–2627.
Irvine, B., Elise, F., Brinkert, J., Poole, D., Farran, E. K., Milne, E., et al. (2024). ‘A storm of post-it notes': experiences of perceptual capacity in autism and ADHD. Neurodiversity 2:27546330241229004. doi: 10.1177/27546330241229004
Iverson, J. M., and Wozniak, R. H. (2007). Variation in vocal-motor development in infant siblings of children with autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 37, 158–170. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0339-z
Jamal, W., Cardinaux, A., Haskins, A. J., Kjelgaard, M., and Sinha, P. (2021). Reduced sensory habituation in autism and its correlation with behavioral measures. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 51, 3153–3164. doi: 10.1007/s10803-020-04780-1
Jaswal, V. K., and Akhtar, N. (2019). Being versus appearing socially uninterested: Challenging assumptions about social motivation in autism. Behav. Brain Sci. 42:e82. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18001826
Jertberg, R., Begeer, S., Geurts, H., Chakrabarti, B., and Van der Burg, E. (2024). Slow but Steady: Similarities and Differences in Executive Functioning Between Autistic and Non-Autistic Adults. Dover, PA: OSF Preprints.
Jertberg, R. M., Wienicke, F. J., Andruszkiewicz, K., Begeer, S., Chakrabarti, B., Geurts, H. M., et al. (2024). Differences between autistic and non-autistic individuals in audiovisual speech integration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 164:105787. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105787
Johnson, M. H. (2014). Autism: demise of the innate social orienting hypothesis. Curr. Biol. 24, R30–R31. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.021
Johnson, S. A., Blaha, L. M., Houpt, J. W., and Townsend, J. T. (2010). Systems factorial technology provides new insights on global–local information processing in autism spectrum disorders. J. Math. Psychol. 54, 53–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2009.06.006
Jones, R. S., Quigney, C., and Huws, J. C. (2003). First-hand accounts of sensory perceptual experiences in autism: a qualitative analysis. J. Intellect. Dev. Disab. 28, 112–121. doi: 10.1080/1366825031000147058
Jones, W., and Klin, A. (2013). Attention to eyes is present but in decline in 2–6-month-old infants later diagnosed with autism. Nature 504, 427–431. doi: 10.1038/nature12715
Joseph, R. M., Keehn, B., Connolly, C., Wolfe, J. M., and Horowitz, T. S. (2009). Why is visual search superior in autism spectrum disorder? Dev. Sci. 12, 1083–1096. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00855.x
Jure, R., Pogonza, R., and Rapin, I. (2016). Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) in blind children: very high prevalence, potentially better outlook. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 46, 749–759. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2612-5
Kapp, S. K. (2013). Empathizing with sensory and movement differences: moving toward sensitive understanding of autism. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 7:38. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00038
Kapp, S. K. (2016). Social Justice and Autism: Links to Personality and Advocacy. Los Angeles: University of California.
Kapp, S. K. (2018a). “Opportunities and perils of extremely early “autism” intervention,” in BeGood Early Intervention Ethics, 30 January. Available online at: https://begoodeie.com/2018/01/30/opportunities-and-perils-of-extremely-early-autism-intervention/ (accessed 13 October, 2024).
Kapp, S. K. (2018b). Social support, well-being, and quality of life among individuals on the autism spectrum. Pediatrics 141, S362–S368. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-4300N
Kapp, S. K. (2022). “Models of helping and coping with autism,” in The Routledge International Handbook of Critical Autism Studies (London: Routledge), 255–269.
Kapp, S. K. (2023). Profound concerns about “profound autism”: dangers of severity scales and functioning labels for support needs. Educ. Sci. 13:106. doi: 10.3390/educsci13020106
Kapp, S. K. (2024). Anne M. Donnellan (1943–2024): a tribute to an autism legend, mentor, and friend. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 18:1469778. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2024.1469778
Kapp, S. K., Gillespie-Lynch, K., Sherman, L. E., and Hutman, T. (2013). Deficit, difference, or both? Autism and neurodiversity. Dev. Psychol. 49, 59–71. doi: 10.1037/a0028353
Kapp, S. K., Goldknopf, E., Brooks, P. J., Kofner, B., and Hossain, M. (2019a). Expanding the critique of the social motivation theory of autism with participatory and developmental research. Behav. Brain Sci. 42:2479. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18002479
Kapp, S. K., and Ne'eman, A. (2020). “Lobbying autism's diagnostic revision in the DSM-5,” in Autistic Community and the Neurodiversity Movement: Stories from the Frontline, ed. S. K. Kapp (London: Palgrave Macmillan), 167–194.
Kapp, S. K., Steward, R., Crane, L., Elliott, D., Elphick, C., Pellicano, E., et al. (2019b). ‘People should be allowed to do what they like': Autistic adults' views and experiences of stimming. Autism 23, 1782–1792. doi: 10.1177/1362361319829628
Karasik, L. B., Adolph, K. E., Fernandes, S. N., Robinson, S. R., and Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (2023). Gahvora cradling in Tajikistan: Cultural practices and associations with motor development. Child Dev. 94, 1049–1067. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13919
Karasik, L. B., and Robinson, S. R. (2022). Milestones or millstones: how standard assessments mask cultural variation and misinform policies aimed at early childhood development. Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sc. 9, 57–64. doi: 10.1177/23727322211068546
Karavidas, M., and de Visser, R. O. (2022). “It's not just in my head, and it's not just irrelevant”: autistic negotiations of menopausal transitions. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 52, 1143–1155. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05010-y
Karmel, B. Z., Gardner, J. M., Meade, L. S., Cohen, I. L., London, E., Flory, M. J., et al. (2010). Early medical and behavioral characteristics of NICU infants later classified with ASD. Pediatrics 126, 457–467. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2680
Kasari, C., Kaiser, A., Goods, K., Nietfeld, J., Mathy, P., Landa, R., et al. (2014). Communication interventions for minimally verbal children with autism: a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 53, 635–646. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.01.019
Kaufman, A., Cox, G., Frewer, V., Williams, K., and Ure, A. (2022). Use of home videos for investigation of early development and skill loss in children diagnosed with autistic regression: a systematic review. Review J. Autism Dev. Disord. 9, 54–69. doi: 10.1007/s40489-021-00241-2
Kaufmann, W. E., Cooper, K. L., Mostofsky, S. H., Capone, G. T., Kates, W. R., Newschaffer, C. J., et al. (2003). Specificity of cerebellar vermian abnormalities in autism: a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Child Neurol. 18, 463–470. doi: 10.1177/08830738030180070501
Kaur, M., Srinivasan, S. M., and Bhat, A. N. (2015). Atypical object exploration in infants at-risk for autism during the first year of lifer. Front. Psychol. 6:798. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00798
Ke, C., Carter, L. A., Green, J., Whitehouse, A. J., Hudry, K., Barbaro, J., et al. (2025). Which emerging autism features at 12 months of age are associated with later parent-child interaction? Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 119:102525. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2024.102525
Keane, E. (2004). Autism: The heart of the disorder? Sensory processing and social engagement—Illustrations from autobiographical accounts and selected research findings. Aust. J. Early Childh. 29, 8–14. doi: 10.1177/183693910402900303
Keehn, B., and Joseph, R. M. (2016). Exploring what's missing: what do target absent trials reveal about autism search superiority? J. Autism Dev. Disord. 46, 1686–1698. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2700-1
Keehn, B., Müller, R. A., and Townsend, J. (2013). Atypical attentional networks and the emergence of autism. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 164–183. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.014
Kelly, D. J., Walker, R., and Norbury, C. F. (2013). Deficits in volitional oculomotor control align with language status in autism spectrum disorders. Dev. Sci. 16, 56–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01188.x
Kent, R. G. (2014). Measuring Autism Spectrum Disorder: Associated Features and Diagnostic Criteria (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Kern, J. K. (2002). The possible role of the in autism/PDD: disruption of a multisensory feedback loop. Med. Hypotheses 59, 255–260. doi: 10.1016/S0306-9877(02)00212-8
Kern, J. K., Geier, D. A., Adams, J. B., Troutman, M. R., Davis, G., King, P. G., et al. (2011). Autism severity and muscle strength: a correlation analysis. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 5, 1011–1015. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2010.11.002
Kern, J. K., Trivedi, M. H., Garver, C. R., Grannemann, B. D., Andrews, A. A., Savla, J. S., et al. (2006). The pattern of sensory processing abnormalities in autism. Autism 10, 480–494. doi: 10.1177/1362361306066564
Kern, J. K., Trivedi, M. H., Grannemann, B. D., Garver, C. R., Johnson, D. G., Andrews, A. A., et al. (2007). Sensory correlations in autism. Autism 11, 123–134. doi: 10.1177/1362361307075702
Kevin, K. Y., Cheung, C., Chua, S. E., and McAlonan, G. M. (2011). Can Asperger syndrome be distinguished from autism? An anatomic likelihood meta-analysis of MRI studies. J. Psychiatry Neurosci.: JPN 36, 412–421. doi: 10.1503/jpn.100138
Khan, A. J., Nair, A., Keown, C. L., Datko, M. C., Lincoln, A. J., and Müller, R. A. (2015b). Cerebro-cerebellar resting-state functional connectivity in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 78, 625–634. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.03.024
Khan, S., Michmizos, K., Tommerdahl, M., Ganesan, S., Kitzbichler, M. G., Zetino, M., et al. (2015a). Somatosensory cortex functional connectivity abnormalities in autism show opposite trends, depending on direction and spatial scale. Brain 138, 1394–1140. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv043
Kilroy, E., Gerbella, M., Cao, L., Molfese, P., Butera, C., Harrison, L., et al. (2022a). Specific tractography differences in autism compared to developmental coordination disorder. Sci. Rep. 12:19246. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21538-0
Kilroy, E., Ring, P., Hossain, A., Nalbach, A., Butera, C., Harrison, L., et al. (2022b). Motor performance, praxis, and social skills in autism spectrum disorder and developmental coordination disorder. Autism Res. 15, 1649–1664. doi: 10.1002/aur.2774
Kim, S. Y., and Bottema-Beutel, K. (2019). A meta regression analysis of quality of life correlates in adults with ASD. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 63, 23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2018.11.004
Kimber, L., Verrier, D., and Connolly, S. (2024). Autistic people's experience of empathy and the autistic empathy deficit narrative. Autism Adulthood 6, 321–330. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0001
Kirby, A. V., Bilder, D. A., Wiggins, L. D., Hughes, M. M., Davis, J., Hall-Lande, J. A., et al. (2022). Sensory features in autism: Findings from a large population-based surveillance system. Autism Res. 15, 751–760. doi: 10.1002/aur.2670
Kirby, R. S., Wingate, M. S., Braun, K. V. N., Doernberg, N. S., Arneson, C. L., Benedict, R. E., et al. (2011). Prevalence and functioning of children with cerebral palsy in four areas of the United States in 2006: a report from the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network. Res. Dev. Disabil. 32, 462–469. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.042
Kirchgessner, M. A., Chuang, A. Z., Patel, S. S., and Sereno, A. B. (2015). Intact reflexive but deficient voluntary social orienting in autism spectrum disorder. Front. Neurosci. 9:453. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00453
Kissine, M., Saint-Denis, A., and Mottron, L. (2023). Language acquisition can be truly atypical in autism: Beyond joint attention. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 153:105384. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105384
Klaus, J., Stoodley, C. J., and Schutter, D. J. (2024). Neurodevelopmental trajectories of cerebellar grey matter associated with verbal abilities in males with autism spectrum disorder. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 67:101379. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101379
Kleinhans, N., Johnson, L., Richards, T., Mahurin, R., Greenson, J., Dawson, G., et al. (2009). Reduced neural habituation in the amygdala and social impairments in autism spectrum disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 166, 467–475. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07101681
Klin, A., Lin, D. J., Gorrindo, P., Ramsay, G., and Jones, W. (2009). Two-year-olds with autism orient to non-social contingencies rather than biological motion. Nature 459, 257–261. doi: 10.1038/nature07868
Koldewyn, K., Jiang, Y. V., Weigelt, S., and Kanwisher, N. (2013). Global/local processing in autism: not a disability, but a disinclination. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 43, 2329–2340. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1777-z
Kose, S., Turer, F., Inal Kaleli, I., Calik Senturk, H. N., Ozuysal Uyar, D. H., and Bildik, T. (2025). The relationship between social skills and sensory profile, emotion regulation, and empathizing/systemizing in adolescents on the autism spectrum. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 55, 59–75. doi: 10.1007/s10803-023-06190-5
Kretch, K. S., Franchak, J. M., and Adolph, K. E. (2014). Crawling and walking infants see the world differently. Child Dev. 85, 1503–1518. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12206
Krueger, K. K. (2013). Minimally Verbal School-Aged Children with Autism: Communication, Academic Engagement and Classroom Quality. Los Angeles: University of California.
Kumazaki, H., Muramatsu, T., Kosaka, H., Fujisawa, T. X., Iwata, K., Tomoda, A., et al. (2015). Sex differences in cognitive and symptom profiles in children with high functioning autism spectrum disorders. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 13, 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2014.12.011
Kyriacou, C., Forrester-Jones, R., and Triantafyllopoulou, P. (2023). Clothes, sensory experiences and autism: is wearing the right fabric important? J. Autism Dev. Disord. 53, 1495–1508. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05140-3
Lacroix, A., Torija, E., Logemann, A., Baciu, M., Cserjesi, R., Dutheil, F., et al. (2025). Cognitive flexibility in autism: how task predictability and sex influence performances. Autism Res. 18, 281–294. doi: 10.1002/aur.3281
Lai, M. C., Lombardo, M. V., Ecker, C., Chakrabarti, B., Suckling, J., Bullmore, E. T., et al. (2015). Neuroanatomy of individual differences in language in adult males with autism. Cereb. Cortex 25, 3613–3628. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu211
Lai, M. C., Lombardo, M. V., Pasco, G., Ruigrok, A. N., Wheelwright, S. J., Sadek, S. A., et al. (2011). A behavioral comparison of male and female adults with high functioning autism spectrum conditions. PLoS ONE 6:e20835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020835
Laidi, C., Floris, D. L., Tillmann, J., Elandaloussi, Y., Zabihi, M., Charman, T., et al. (2022). Cerebellar atypicalities in autism? Biol. Psychiatry 92, 674–682. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.05.020
Lainé, F., Rauzy, S., Tardif, C., and Gepner, B. (2011). Slowing down the presentation of facial and body movements enhances imitation performance in children with severe autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 41, 983–996. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-1123-7
Lambert-Brown, B. L., McDonald, N. M., Mattson, W. I., Martin, K. B., Ibañez, L. V., Stone, W. L., et al. (2015). Positive emotional engagement and autism risk. Dev. Psychol. 51, 848–855. doi: 10.1037/a0039182
Lazenby, D. C., Sideridis, G. D., Huntington, N., Prante, M., Dale, P. S., Curtin, S., et al. (2016). Language differences at 12 months in infants who develop autism spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 46, 899–909. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2632-1
Leary, M. R., and Donnellan, A. M. (2012). Autism: Sensory-Movement Differences and Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge Book Review Press.
LeBarton, E. S., and Iverson, J. M. (2013). Fine motor skill predicts expressive language in infant siblings of children with autism. Dev. Sci. 16, 815–827. doi: 10.1111/desc.12069
LeBarton, E. S., and Landa, R. J. (2019). Infant motor skill predicts later expressive language and autism spectrum disorder diagnosis. Infant Behav. Dev. 54, 37–47.
Leekam, S. R., Nieto, C., Libby, S. J., Wing, L., and Gould, J. (2007). Describing the sensory abnormalities of children and adults with autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 37, 894–910. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0218-7
Legge, G. E., Madison, C., Vaughn, B. N., Cheong, A. M., and Miller, J. C. (2008). Retention of high tactile acuity throughout the life span in blindness. Perce. Psychophys. 70, 1471–1488. doi: 10.3758/PP.70.8.1471
Lemcke, S., Juul, S., Parner, E. T., Lauritsen, M. B., and Thorsen, P. (2013). Early signs of autism in toddlers: a follow-up study in the Danish National Birth Cohort. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 43, 2366–2375. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1785-z
Lepping, R. J., McKinney, W. S., Magnon, G. C., Keedy, S. K., Wang, Z., Coombes, S. A., et al. (2022). Visuomotor brain network activation and functional connectivity among individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Hum. Brain Mapp. 43, 844–859. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25692
Lewis, L. F., and Stevens, K. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism 27, 1817–1825. doi: 10.1177/13623613221145783
Lewkowicz, D. J. (2014). Early experience and multisensory perceptual narrowing. Dev. Psychobiol. 56, 292–315. doi: 10.1002/dev.21197
Lewkowicz, D. J., and Ghazanfar, A. A. (2009). The emergence of multisensory systems through perceptual narrowing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 470–478. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.004
Libster, N., Knox, A., Engin, S., Geschwind, D., Parish-Morris, J., and Kasari, C. (2022). Personal victimization experiences of autistic and non-autistic children. Mol. Autism 13:51. doi: 10.1186/s13229-022-00531-4
Lidstone, D. E., and Mostofsky, S. H. (2021). Moving toward understanding autism: Visual-motor integration, imitation, and social skill development. Pediatr. Neurol. 122, 98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2021.06.010
Lidstone, D. E., Rochowiak, R., Mostofsky, S. H., and Nebel, M. B. (2021). A data driven approach reveals that anomalous motor system connectivity is associated with the severity of core autism symptoms. Autism Res. doi: 10.1002/aur.2476
Liloia, D., Zamfira, D. A., Tanaka, M., Manuello, J., Crocetta, A., Keller, R., et al. (2024). Disentangling the role of gray matter volume and concentration in autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analytic investigation of 25 years of voxel-based morphometry research. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 164:105791. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105791
Lim, Y. H., Licari, M., Spittle, A. J., Watkins, R. E., Zwicker, J. G., Downs, J., et al. (2021). Early motor function of children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Pediatrics 147:011270. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-011270
Lim, Y. H., Partridge, K., Girdler, S., and Morris, S. L. (2017). Standing postural control in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 47, 2238–2253. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3144-y
Lin, L. Y., and Huang, P. C. (2019). Quality of life and its related factors for adults with autism spectrum disorder. Disabil. Rehabil. 41, 896–903. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1414887
Linke, A. C., Kinnear, M. K., Kohli, J. S., Fong, C. H., Lincoln, A. J., Carper, R. A., et al. (2020). Impaired motor skills and atypical functional connectivity of the sensorimotor system in 40-to 65-year-old adults with autism spectrum disorders. Neurobiol. Aging 85, 104–112. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.09.018
Linkenauger, S. A., Lerner, M. D., Ramenzoni, V. C., and Proffitt, D. R. (2012). A perceptual–motor deficit predicts social and communicative impairments in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Autism Res. 5, 352–362. doi: 10.1002/aur.1248
Liu, J., Okada, N. J., Cummings, K. K., Jung, J., Patterson, G., Bookheimer, S. Y., et al. (2020). Emerging atypicalities in functional connectivity of language-related networks in young infants at high familial risk for ASD. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 45:100814. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100814
Liu, J., Tsang, T., Jackson, L., Ponting, C., Jeste, S. S., Bookheimer, S. Y., et al. (2019). Altered lateralization of dorsal language tracts in 6-week-old infants at risk for autism. Dev. Sci. 22:e12768. doi: 10.1111/desc.12768
Logan, K., Iacono, T., and Trembath, D. (2017). A systematic review of research into aided AAC to increase social-communication functions in children with autism spectrum disorder. Augment. Alternative Commun. 33, 51–64. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2016.1267795
Long, H., Cooper, K., and Russell, A. (2024). ‘Autism is the Arena and OCD is the Lion': Autistic adults' experiences of co-occurring obsessive-compulsive disorder and repetitive restricted behaviours and interests. Autism 28, 2897–2908. doi: 10.1177/13623613241251512
Lord, C., Bishop, S., and Anderson, D. (2015). Developmental trajectories as autism phenotypes. Am. J. Med. Genet. 169, 198–208. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31440
Losh, M., and Capps, L. (2006). Understanding of emotional experience in autism: insights from the personal accounts of high-functioning children with autism. Dev. Psychol. 42, 809–818. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.809
Loth, E. (2023). Does the current state of biomarker discovery in autism reflect the limits of reductionism in precision medicine? Suggestions for an integrative approach that considers dynamic mechanisms between brain, body, and the social environment. Front. Psychiatry 14:1085445. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1085445
Lucas, R. F., and Cutler, A. (2015). Dysregulated breastfeeding behaviors in children later diagnosed with autism. J. Perinatal Educ. 24, 171–180. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.24.3.171
Ludlow, A. K., Giannadou, A., Franklin, A., Allen, P. M., Simmons, D. R., and Wilkins, A. J. (2020). The possible use of precision tinted lenses to improve social cognition in children with autism spectrum disorders. Vision Res. 170, 53–59. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2020.03.007
Ludlow, A. K., Taylor-Whiffen, E., and Wilkins, A. J. (2012). Coloured filters enhance the visual perception of social cues in children with autism spectrum disorders. Int. Scholarly Res. Notices 2012:298098. doi: 10.5402/2012/298098
Ludlow, A. K., Wilkins, A. J., and Heaton, P. (2006). The effect of coloured overlays on reading ability in children with autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 36, 507–516. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0090-5
Lundqvist, L. O. (2015). Hyper-responsiveness to touch mediates social dysfunction in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 9, 13–20. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2014.09.012
Lung, S. L. M., Picard, È., Soulières, I., and Bertone, A. (2024). Identifying the functions of restricted and repetitive behaviours and interests in Autism: a scoping review. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 117:102458. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2024.102458
MacLennan, K., Roach, L., and Tavassoli, T. (2020). The relationship between sensory reactivity differences and anxiety subtypes in autistic children. Autism Res. 13, 785–795. doi: 10.1002/aur.2259
MacLennan, K., Woolley, C., Andsensory, E., Heasman, B., Starns, J., George, B., et al. (2023). “It is a big spider web of things”: Sensory experiences of autistic adults in public spaces. Autism Adulthood 5, 411–422. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0024
MacNeil, L. K., and Mostofsky, S. H. (2012). Specificity of dyspraxia in children with autism. Neuropsychology 26, 165–171. doi: 10.1037/a0026955
Maes, P., La Valle, C., and Tager-Flusberg, H. (2024). Frequency and characteristics of echoes and self-repetitions in minimally verbal and verbally fluent autistic individuals. Autism Dev. Lang. Impairm. 9:23969415241262207. doi: 10.1177/23969415241262207
Maffei, M. F., Chenausky, K. V., Gill, S. V., Tager-Flusberg, H., and Green, J. R. (2023). Oromotor skills in autism spectrum disorder: a scoping review. Autism Res. 16, 879–917. doi: 10.1002/aur.2923
Maffei, M. F., Chenausky, K. V., Haenssler, A., Abbiati, C., Tager-Flusberg, H., and Green, J. R. (2024). Exploring motor speech disorders in low and minimally verbal autistic individuals: an auditory-perceptual analysis. Am. J. Speech-Lang. Pathol. 33, 1485–1503. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00237
Maljaars, J., Noens, I., Jansen, R., Scholte, E., and van Berckelaer-Onnes, I. (2011). Intentional communication in nonverbal and verbal low-functioning children with autism. J. Commun. Disord. 44, 601–614. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.07.004
Mammen, M. A., Moore, G. A., Scaramella, L. V., Reiss, D., Ganiban, J. M., Shaw, D. S., et al. (2015). Infant avoidance during a tactile task predicts autism spectrum behaviors in toddlerhood. Infant Ment. Health J. 36, 575–587. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21539
Manjaly, Z. M., Bruning, N., Neufang, S., Stephan, K. E., Brieber, S., Marshall, J. C., et al. (2007). Neurophysiological correlates of relatively enhanced local visual search in autistic adolescents. Neuroimage 35, 283–291. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.036
Manning, C., Tibber, M. S., Charman, T., Dakin, S. C., and Pellicano, E. (2015). Enhanced integration of motion information in children with autism. J. Neurosci. 35, 6979–6986. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4645-14.2015
Marko, M. K., Crocetti, D., Hulst, T., Donchin, O., Shadmehr, R., and Mostofsky, S. H. (2015). Behavioural and neural basis of anomalous motor learning in children with autism. Brain 138, 784–797. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu394
Martel, M., Finos, L., Bahmad, S., Koun, E., Salemme, R., Sonié, S., et al. (2024). Motor deficits in autism differ from that of developmental coordination disorder. Autism 28, 415–432. doi: 10.1177/13623613231171980
Martineau, J., Schmitz, C., Assaiante, C., Blanc, R., and Barthélémy, C. (2004). Impairment of a cortical event-related desynchronisation during a bimanual load-lifting task in children with autistic disorder. Neurosci. Lett. 367, 298–303. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.06.018
Masterton, B. A., and Biederman, G. B. (1983). Proprioceptive versus visual control in autistic children. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 13, 141–152. doi: 10.1007/BF01531815
Maurer, D., and Werker, J. F. (2014). Perceptual narrowing during infancy: a comparison of language and faces. Dev. Psychobiol. 56, 154–178. doi: 10.1002/dev.21177
Mazefsky, C. A., Borue, X., Day, T. N., and Minshew, N. J. (2014). Emotion regulation patterns in adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder: comparison to typically developing adolescents and association with psychiatric symptoms. Autism Res. 7, 344–354. doi: 10.1002/aur.1366
McGlade, A., Whittingham, K., Barfoot, J., Taylor, L., and Boyd, R. N. (2023). Efficacy of very early interventions on neurodevelopmental outcomes for infants and toddlers at increased likelihood of or diagnosed with autism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Autism Res. 16, 1145–1160. doi: 10.1002/aur.2924
McKinney, W. S., Kelly, S. E., Unruh, K. E., Shafer, R. L., Sweeney, J. A., Styner, M., et al. (2022). Cerebellar volumes and sensorimotor behavior in autism spectrum disorder. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 16:821109. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2022.821109
McKinnon, C. J., Eggebrecht, A. T., Todorov, A., Wolff, J. J., Elison, J. T., Adams, C. M., et al. (2019). Restricted and repetitive behavior and brain functional connectivity in infants at risk for developing autism spectrum disorder. Biol. Psychiat. 4, 50–61. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.09.008
McMillion, A., Van Herwegen, J., Johnson, A., Monteiro, J., Cronin, A. J., and Remington, A. (2021). Dental experiences of a group of autistic adults based in the United Kingdom. Special Care Dentist. 41, 474–488. doi: 10.1111/scd.12583
McPhillips, M., Finlay, J., Bejerot, S., and Hanley, M. (2014). Motor deficits in children with autism spectrum disorder: a cross-syndrome study. Autism Res. 7, 664–676. doi: 10.1002/aur.1408
Meilleur, A. A. S., Jelenic, P., and Mottron, L. (2015). Prevalence of clinically and empirically defined talents and strengths in autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 45, 1354–1367. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2296-2
Merchie, A., and Gomot, M. (2023). Habituation, adaptation and prediction processes in Neurodevelopmental disorders: A comprehensive review. Brain Sci. 13:1110. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13071110
Miller, H. L., Licari, M. K., Bhat, A., Aziz-Zadeh, L. S., Van Damme, T., Fears, N. E., et al. (2024). Motor problems in autism: Co-occurrence or feature? Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 66, 16–22. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15674
Miller, M., Chukoskie, L., Zinni, M., Townsend, J., and Trauner, D. (2014). Dyspraxia, motor function and visual–motor integration in autism. Behav. Brain Res. 269, 95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.04.011
Milton, D. E. (2012). On the ontological status of autism: The ‘double empathy problem'. Disab. Soc. 27, 883–887. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2012.710008
Milton, D. E., and Green, J. (2024). Theorising autism. Autism 28, 795–797. doi: 10.1177/13623613241235786
Ming, X., Brimacombe, M., and Wagner, G. C. (2007). Prevalence of motor impairment in autism spectrum disorders. Brain Dev. 29, 565–570. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2007.03.002
Miniscalco, C., Rudling, M., Råstam, M., Gillberg, C., and Johnels, J. Å. (2014). Imitation (rather than core language) predicts pragmatic development in young children with ASD: a preliminary longitudinal study using CDI parental reports. Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord. 49, 369–375. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12085
Minshew, N. J., Luna, B., and Sweeney, J. A. (1999). Oculomotor evidence for neocorticial systems but not cerebellar dysfunction in autism. Neurology 52, 917–922. doi: 10.1212/WNL.52.5.917
Miron, O., Ari-Even Roth, D., Gabis, L. V., Henkin, Y., Shefer, S., Dinstein, I., et al. (2016). Prolonged auditory brainstem responses in infants with autism. Autism Res. 9, 689–695. doi: 10.1002/aur.1561
Mohammad, S., Gentreau, M., Dubol, M., Rukh, G., Mwinyi, J., and Schiöth, H. B. (2024a). Association of polygenic scores for autism with volumetric MRI phenotypes in cerebellum and brainstem in adults. Mol. Autism 15, 34.
Mohammadzaheri, F., Koegel, L. K., Rezaee, M., and Rafiee, S. M. (2014b). A randomized clinical trial comparison between pivotal response treatment (PRT) and structured applied behavior analysis (ABA) intervention for children with autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 44, 2769–2777. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2137-3
Moore, D. J. (2015). Acute pain experience in individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a review. Autism 19, 387–399. doi: 10.1177/1362361314527839
Morrel, J., Singapuri, K., Landa, R. J., and Reetzke, R. (2023). Neural correlates and predictors of speech and language development in infants at elevated likelihood for autism: a systematic review. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 17:1211676. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1211676
Morris, I. F., Sykes, J. R., Paulus, E. R., Dameh, A., Razzaque, A., Esch, L. V., et al. (2025). Beyond self-regulation: autistic experiences and perceptions of stimming. Neurodiversity, 3:27546330241311096. doi: 10.1177/27546330241311096
Morris, S. L., Foster, C. J., Parsons, R., Falkmer, M., Falkmer, T., and Rosalie, S. M. (2015). Differences in the use of vision and proprioception for postural control in autism spectrum disorder. Neuroscience 307, 273–280. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.08.040
Morrison, K. E., DeBrabander, K. M., Jones, D. R., Ackerman, R. A., and Sasson, N. J. (2020). Social cognition, social skill, and social motivation minimally predict social interaction outcomes for autistic and non-autistic adults. Front. Psychol. 11:591100. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591100
Moseley, R. L., Druce, T., and Turner-Cobb, J. M. (2020). ‘When my autism broke': a qualitative study spotlighting autistic voices on menopause. Autism 24, 1423–1437. doi: 10.1177/1362361319901184
Mostofsky, S. H., and Ewen, J. B. (2011). Altered connectivity and action model formation in autism is autism. Neuroscientist 17, 437–448. doi: 10.1177/1073858410392381
Mottron, L., Dawson, M., Soulieres, I., Hubert, B., and Burack, J. (2006). Enhanced perceptual functioning in autism: an update, and eight principles of autistic perception. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 36, 27–43. doi: 10.1007/s10803-005-0040-7
Mundy, P., Gwaltney, M., and Henderson, H. (2010). Self-referenced processing, neurodevelopment and joint attention in autism. Autism 14, 408–429. doi: 10.1177/1362361310366315
Murat Baldwin, M., Xiao, Z., and Murray, A. (2022). Temporal synchrony in autism: a systematic review. Review J. Autism Dev. Disord. 9, 596–617. doi: 10.1007/s40489-021-00276-5
Muris, P., and Ollendick, T. H. (2021). Selective mutism and its relations to social anxiety disorder and autism spectrum disorder. Clin. Child Fam. Psychol. Rev. 24, 294–325. doi: 10.1007/s10567-020-00342-0
Murray, D., Lesser, M., and Lawson, W. (2005). Attention, monotropism and the diagnostic criteria for autism. Autism 9, 139–156. doi: 10.1177/1362361305051398
Murray, D., Milton, D., Green, J., and Bervoets, J. (2023). The human spectrum: a phenomenological enquiry within neurodiversity. Psychopathology 56, 220–230. doi: 10.1159/000526213
Myles, B. S., Trautman, M. L., and Schelvan, R. L. (2024). The Hidden Curriculum: Understanding Unstated Rules in Social Situations. Arlington, TX: Future Horizons.
Nadel, J. (2015). Perception–action coupling and imitation in autism spectrum disorder. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 57, 55–58. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12689
Nader, R., Oberlander, T. F., Chambers, C. T., and Craig, K. D. (2004). Expression of pain in children with autism. Clin. J. Pain 20, 88–97. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200403000-00005
Nair, V. K., Farah, W., and Boveda, M. (2024). Is neurodiversity a Global Northern White paradigm? Autism 2024:13623613241280835. doi: 10.1177/13623613241280835
Narvekar, N., Carter Leno, V., Pasco, G., Begum Ali, J., Johnson, M. H., Charman, T., et al. (2024). The roles of sensory hyperreactivity and hyporeactivity in understanding infant fearfulness and emerging autistic traits. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 65, 1022–1036. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13941
Nebel, M. B., Eloyan, A., Nettles, C. A., Sweeney, K. L., Ament, K., Ward, R. E., et al. (2016). Intrinsic visual-motor synchrony correlates with social deficits in autism. Biol. Psychiatry 79, 633–641. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.08.029
Neely, K. A., Mohanty, S., Schmitt, L. M., Wang, Z., Sweeney, J. A., and Mosconi, M. W. (2019). Motor memory deficits contribute to motor impairments in autism spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 49, 2675–2684. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2806-5
Neil, L., Olsson, N. C., and Pellicano, E. (2016). The relationship between intolerance of uncertainty, sensory sensitivities, and anxiety in autistic and typically developing children. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 46, 1962–1973. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2721-9
Newman, R. S., Kirby, L. A., Von Holzen, K., and Redcay, E. (2021). Read my lips! Perception of speech in noise by preschool children with autism and the impact of watching the speaker's face. J. Neurodev. Disord. 13, 1–20. doi: 10.1186/s11689-020-09348-9
Nickel, L. R., Thatcher, A. R., Keller, F., Wozniak, R. H., and Iverson, J. M. (2013). Posture development in infants at heightened versus low risk for autism spectrum disorders. Infancy 18, 639–661. doi: 10.1111/infa.12025
Nicolaidis, C., Raymaker, D. M., McDonald, K. E., Lund, E. M., Leotti, S., Kapp, S. K., et al. (2020). Creating accessible survey instruments for use with autistic adults and people with intellectual disability: Lessons learned and recommendations. Autism Adulthood 2, 61–76. doi: 10.1089/aut.2019.0074
Nimbley, E. (2024). Mixed-Methods Investigation into the Role of Sensory, Social and Emotional Factors in the Overlap Between Autism and Anorexia Nervosa (Doctoral dissertation). University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Nordahl, C. W., Lange, N., Li, D. D., Barnett, L. A., Lee, A., Buonocore, M. H., et al. (2011). Brain enlargement is associated with regression in preschool-age boys with autism spectrum disorders. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 108, 20195–20200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107560108
Nyström, P., Gliga, T., Nilsson Jobs, E., Gredebäck, G., Charman, T., Johnson, M. H., et al. (2018). Enhanced pupillary light reflex in infancy is associated with autism diagnosis in toddlerhood. Nat. Commun. 9:1678. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03985-4
Nyström, P., Jones, E., Darki, F., Bölte, S., and Falck-Ytter, T. (2021). Atypical topographical organization of global form and motion processing in 5-month-old infants at risk for autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 51, 364–370. doi: 10.1007/s10803-020-04523-2
Oakley, B. F., Tillmann, J., Ahmad, J., Crawley, D., San José Cáceres, A., Holt, R., et al. (2021). How do core autism traits and associated symptoms relate to quality of life? Findings from the longitudinal european autism project. Autism 25, 389–404. doi: 10.1177/1362361320959959
Ohta, H., Yamada, T., Watanabe, H., Kanai, C., Tanaka, E., Ohno, T., et al. (2012). An fMRI study of reduced perceptual load-dependent modulation of task-irrelevant activity in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Neuroimage 61, 1176–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.042
Okada, N. J., Liu, J., Tsang, T., Nosco, E., McDonald, N. M., Cummings, K. K., et al. (2022). Atypical cerebellar functional connectivity at 9 months of age predicts delayed socio-communicative profiles in infants at high and low risk for autism. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 63, 1002–1016. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13555
Oldehinkel, M., Mennes, M., Marquand, A., Charman, T., Tillmann, J., Ecker, C., et al. (2019). Altered connectivity between cerebellum, visual, and sensory-motor networks in autism spectrum disorder: results from the EU-AIMS longitudinal European autism project. Biol. Psychiat. 4, 260–270. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.11.010
Olson, I. R., Hoffman, L. J., Jobson, K. R., Popal, H. S., and Wang, Y. (2023). Little brain, little minds: the big role of the cerebellum in social development. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 60:101238. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101238
O'Neill, M., and Jones, R. S. (1997). Sensory-perceptual abnormalities in autism: a case for more research? J. Autism Dev. Disord. 27, 283–293 doi: 10.1023/A:1025850431170
Orinstein, A. J., Suh, J., Porter, K., De Yoe, K. A., Tyson, K. E., Troyb, E., et al. (2015). Social function and communication in optimal outcome children and adolescents with an autism history on structured test measures. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 45, 2443–2463. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2409-6
Ornitz, E. M. (1974). The modulation of sensory input and motor output in autistic children. J. Autism Child. Schizophr. 4, 197–215. doi: 10.1007/BF02115226
Ornitz, E. M., Atwell, C. W., Kaplan, A. R., and Westlake, J. R. (1985). Brain-stem dysfunction in autism: results of vestibular stimulation. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 42, 1018–1025. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790330102012
Osório, J. M. A., Rodríguez-Herreros, B., Richetin, S., Junod, V., Romascano, D., Pittet, V., et al. (2021). Sex differences in sensory processing in children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research 14, 2412–2423. doi: 10.1002/aur.2580
Oster, L. M., and Zhou, G. (2022). Balance and vestibular deficits in pediatric patients with autism spectrum disorder: an underappreciated clinical aspect. Autism Res. Treat. 2022:7568572. doi: 10.1155/2022/7568572
Ostrolenk, A., d'Arc, B. F., Jelenic, P., Samson, F., and Mottron, L. (2017). Hyperlexia: Systematic review, neurocognitive modelling, and outcome. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 79, 134–149. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.029
Özçalişkan, S., Adamson, L. B., and Dimitrova, N. (2016). Early deictic but not other gestures predict later vocabulary in both typical development and autism. Autism 20, 754–763. doi: 10.1177/1362361315605921
Ozonoff, S., and Iosif, A. M. (2019). Changing conceptualizations of regression: What prospective studies reveal about the onset of autism spectrum disorder. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 100, 296–304. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.03.012
Ozonoff, S., Iosif, A. M., Baguio, F., Cook, I. C., Hill, M. M., Hutman, T., et al. (2010). A prospective study of the emergence of early behavioral signs of autism. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 49, 256–266. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2009.11.009
Ozonoff, S., Iosif, A. M., Young, G. S., Hepburn, S., Thompson, M., Colombi, C., et al. (2011). Onset patterns in autism: correspondence between home video and parent report. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 50, 796–806. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.03.012
Ozonoff, S., Young, G. S., Landa, R. J., Brian, J., Bryson, S., Charman, T., et al. (2015). Diagnostic stability in young children at risk for autism spectrum disorder: a baby siblings research consortium study. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 56, 988–998. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12421
Pagán, A. F., Izuno-Garcia, A. K., Hughes, K. R., Chapman, K. S., and Loveland, K. A. (2024). Self-and informant report in a first-time diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder in adulthood: the role of females. Adv. Neurodev. Disord. 8, 536–546. doi: 10.1007/s41252-023-00371-0
Paolucci, C., Giorgini, F., Scheda, R., Alessi, F. V., and Diciotti, S. (2023). Early prediction of autism spectrum disorders through interaction analysis in home videos and explainable artificial intelligence. Comput. Human Behav. 148:107877. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107877
Patterson, S. Y., Elder, L., Gulsrud, A., and Kasari, C. (2014). The association between parental interaction style and children's joint engagement in families with toddlers with autism. Autism 18, 511–518. doi: 10.1177/1362361313483595
Pearson, N., Charman, T., Happé, F., Bolton, P. F., and McEwen, F. S. (2018). Regression in autism spectrum disorder: reconciling findings from retrospective and prospective research. Autism Res. 11, 1602–1620. doi: 10.1002/aur.2035
Pellecchia, M., Connell, J. E., Beidas, R. S., Xie, M., Marcus, S. C., and Mandell, D. S. (2015). Dismantling the active ingredients of an intervention for children with autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 45, 2917–2927. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2455-0
Perani, D., Saccuman, M. C., Scifo, P., Anwander, A., Spada, D., Baldoli, C., et al. (2011). Neural language networks at birth. Proc. Nat. Acad. Scie. USA 108, 16056–16061. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102991108
Perry, R. C., Johnson, M. H., Charman, T., Pascoe, G., Tolmie, A., Thomas, M. S., et al. (2024). Twenty-four-month effortful control predicts emerging autism characteristics. Dev. Sci. 27:1356. doi: 10.1111/desc.13560
Petrolini, V., Rodríguez-Armendariz, E., and Vicente, A. (2023). Autistic camouflaging across the spectrum. New Ideas Psychol. 68:100992. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100992
Phung, J., Penner, M., Pirlot, C., and Welch, C. (2021). What I wish you knew: Insights on burnout, inertia, meltdown, and shutdown from autistic youth. Front. Psychol. 12:741421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.741421
Piccardi, E. S., Begum Ali, J., Jones, E. J., Mason, L., Charman, T., Johnson, M. H., et al. (2021). Behavioural and neural markers of tactile sensory processing in infants at elevated likelihood of autism spectrum disorder and/or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J. Neurodev. Disord. 13:1. doi: 10.1186/s11689-020-09334-1
Pickles, A., McCauley, J. B., Pepa, L. A., Huerta, M., and Lord, C. (2020). The adult outcome of children referred for autism: Typology and prediction from childhood. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 61, 760–767. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13180
Pickles, A., Wright, N., Bedford, R., Steiman, M., Duku, E., Bennett, T., et al. (2022). Predictors of language regression and its association with subsequent communication development in children with autism. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 63, 1243–1251. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13565
Pierce, K., and Courchesne, E. (2001). Evidence for a cerebellar role in reduced exploration and stereotyped behavior in autism. Biol. Psychiatry 49, 655–664 doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(00)01008-8
Pineda, R., Melchior, K., Oberle, S., Inder, T., and Rogers, C. (2015). Assessment of autism symptoms during the neonatal period: is there early evidence of autism risk? Am. J. Occup. Therapy 69, 6904220010p1–6904220010p11. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2015.015925
Plank, I. S., Traiger, L. S., Nelson, A. M., Koehler, J. C., Lang, S. F., Tepest, R., et al. (2023). The role of interpersonal synchrony in forming impressions of autistic and non-autistic adults. Sci. Rep. 13:15306. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42006-3
Polzer, L., Schenk, M., Raji, N., Kleber, S., Lemler, C., Kitzerow-Cleven, J., et al. (2024). Temporal progression of pupil dilation and gaze behavior to emotion expressions in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder. Sci. Rep. 14:7843. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58480-2
Potrzeba, E. R., Fein, D., and Naigles, L. (2015). Investigating the shape bias in typically developing children and children with autism spectrum disorders. Front. Psychol. 6:446. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00446
Powell, H. J., He, J. L., Khalil, N., Wodka, E. L., Deronda, A., Edden, R. A., et al. (2025). Perceptual alterations in the relationship between sensory reactivity, intolerance of uncertainty, and anxiety in autistic children with and without ADHD. Dev. Psychopathol. 37, 16–28. doi: 10.1017/S0954579423001360
Prescott, K. E., and Ellis Weismer, S. (2022). Children with ASD and communication regression: Examining pre-loss skills and later language outcomes through the preschool years. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 52, 1956–1970. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05098-2
Press, C., Richardson, D., and Bird, G. (2010). Intact imitation of emotional facial actions in autism spectrum conditions. Neuropsychologia 48, 3291–3297. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.012
Price, K. J., Shiffrar, M., and Kerns, K. A. (2012). Movement perception and movement production in Asperger's Syndrome. Res. Autism Spect. Disord. 6, 391–398. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.06.013
Pripas-Kapit, S. (2020). “Historicizing Jim Sinclair's “Don't mourn for us”: a cultural and intellectual history of neurodiversity's first manifesto,” in Autistic Community and the Neurodiversity Movement: Stories from the Frontline, ed. S. K. Kapp (London: Palgrave Macmillan), 23–39.
Rapaport, H., Clapham, H., Adams, J., Lawson, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., and Pellicano, E. (2024a). ‘I live in extremes': a qualitative investigation of Autistic adults' experiences of inertial rest and motion. Autism 28, 1305–1315. doi: 10.1177/13623613231198916
Rapaport, H., Clapham, H., Adams, J., Lawson, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., and Pellicano, E. (2024b). “In a state of flow”: a qualitative examination of autistic adults' phenomenological experiences of task immersion. Autism Adulthood 6, 362–373. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0032
Rapin, I. (1995). Autistic regression and disintegrative disorder: how important the role of epilepsy? Seminars Pediat. Neurol. 2, 278–285. doi: 10.1016/S1071-9091(95)80007-7
Ratto, A. B., Bascom, J., daVanport, S., Strang, J. F., Anthony, L. G., Verbalis, A., et al. (2023). Centering the inner experience of autism: development of the self-assessment of autistic traits. Autism Adulthood 5, 93–105. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0099
Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., et al. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism Adulthood 2, 132–143. doi: 10.1089/aut.2019.0079
Riccio, A., Kapp, S. K., Jordan, A., Dorelien, A. M., and Gillespie-Lynch, K. (2021). How is autistic identity in adolescence influenced by parental disclosure decisions and perceptions of autism? Autism 25, 374–388.
Rice, L. C., and Stoodley, C. J. (2021). “The cerebellum as a CNS Hub modulating autism-relevant behaviors,” in Cerebellum as a CNS Hub (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 413–429.
Rimland, B. (1964). Infantile Autism: The Syndrome and its Implications for a Neural Theory of Behavior. Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Ringold, S. M., McGuire, R. W., Jayashankar, A., Kilroy, E., Butera, C. D., Harrison, L., et al. (2022). Sensory modulation in children with developmental coordination disorder compared to autism spectrum disorder and typically developing children. Brain Sci. 12:1171. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12091171
Riquelme, I., Hatem, S. M., and Montoya, P. (2016). Abnormal pressure pain, touch sensitivity, proprioception, and manual dexterity in children with autism spectrum disorders. Neural Plast. 2016:1723401. doi: 10.1155/2016/1723401
Riva, D., Annunziata, S., Contarino, V., Erbetta, A., Aquino, D., and Bulgheroni, S. (2013). Gray matter reduction in the vermis and CRUS-II is associated with social and interaction deficits in low-functioning children with autistic spectrum disorders: a VBM-DARTEL Study. Cerebellum 12, 676–685. doi: 10.1007/s12311-013-0469-8
Robertson, A. E., and Simmons, D. R. (2015). The sensory experiences of adults with autism spectrum disorder: a qualitative analysis. Perception 44, 569–586. doi: 10.1068/p7833
Robertson, C. E., Kravitz, D. J., Freyberg, J., Baron-Cohen, S., and Baker, C. I. (2013). Slower rate of binocular rivalry in autism. J. Neurosci. 33, 16983–16991. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0448-13.2013
Robertson, C. E., Thomas, C., Kravitz, D. J., Wallace, G. L., Baron-Cohen, S., Martin, A., et al. (2014). Global motion perception deficits in autism are reflected as early as primary visual cortex. Brain 137, 2588–2599. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu189
Robledo, J., and Donnellan, A. M. (2016). Supportive relationships in autism spectrum disorder: perspectives of individuals with ASD and supporters. Behav. Sci. 6:23. doi: 10.3390/bs6040023
Robledo, J., Donnellan, A. M., and Strandt-Conroy, K. (2012). An exploration of sensory and movement differences from the perspective of individuals with autism. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 6:107. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00107
Robledo, J. A., and Donnellan, A. M. (2008). Properties of supportive relationships from the perspective of academically successful individuals with autism. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 46, 299–310. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556(2008)46[299:POSRFT]2.0.CO;2
Rogers, S. J. (2009). What are infant siblings teaching us about autism in infancy? Autism Res. 2, 125–137. doi: 10.1002/aur.81
Rosen, N. E., Lord, C., and Volkmar, F. R. (2021). The diagnosis of autism: from Kanner to DSM-III to DSM-5 and beyond. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 51, 4253–4270. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-04904-1
Rosenhall, U., Nordin, V., Brantberg, K., and Gillberg, C. (2003). Autism and auditory brain stem responses. Ear Hear. 24, 206–214. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000069326.11466.7E
Rozga, A., Hutman, T., Young, G. S., Rogers, S. J., Ozonoff, S., Dapretto, M., et al. (2011). Behavioral profiles of affected and unaffected siblings of children with autism: contribution of measures of mother–infant interaction and nonverbal communication. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 41, 287–301. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-1051-6
Rudling, M., Nyström, P., Bölte, S., and Falck-Ytter, T. (2022). Larger pupil dilation to nonsocial sounds in infants with subsequent autism diagnosis. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 63, 793–801. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13520
Russell, G. (2020). “Critiques of the neurodiversity movement,” in Autistic Community and the Neurodiversity Movement, ed. S. K. Kapp (London: Palgrave Macmillan), 287–303.
Russell, G., Kapp, S. K., Elliott, D., Elphick, C., Gwernan-Jones, R., and Owens, C. (2019). Mapping the autistic advantage from the accounts of adults diagnosed with autism: a qualitative study. Autism Adulthood 1, 124–133. doi: 10.1089/aut.2018.0035
Rutherford, M. D., Walsh, J. A., and Lee, V. (2015). Brief report: Infants developing with ASD show a unique developmental pattern of facial feature scanning. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 45, 2618–2623. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2396-7
Rutter, M., and Pickles, A. (2016). Annual research review: threats to the validity of child psychiatry and psychology. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 57, 398–416. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12461
Rutter, M., and Sonuga-Barke, E. J. (2010). X. Conclusions: overview of findings from the era study, inferences, and research implications. Monographs Soc. Res. Child Dev. 75, 212–229. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2010.00557.x
Sabatos-DeVito, M., Schipul, S. E., Bulluck, J. C., Belger, A., and Baranek, G. T. (2016). Eye tracking reveals impaired attentional disengagement associated with sensory response patterns in children with autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 46, 1319–1333. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2681-5
Sacrey, L. A. R., Armstrong, V. L., Bryson, S. E., and Zwaigenbaum, L. (2014a). Impairments to visual disengagement in autism spectrum disorder: a review of experimental studies from infancy to adulthood. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 47, 559–577. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.10.011
Sacrey, L. A. R., Bennett, J. A., and Zwaigenbaum, L. (2015). Early infant development and intervention for autism spectrum disorder. J. Child Neurol. 30, 1921–1929. doi: 10.1177/0883073815601500
Sacrey, L. A. R., Germani, T., Bryson, S. E., and Zwaigenbaum, L. (2014b). Reaching and grasping in autism spectrum disorder: a review of recent literature. Front. Neurol. 5:6. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00006
Sahuquillo-Leal, R., Ghosn, F., Moreno-Giménez, A., Almansa, B., Serrano-Lozano, E., Ferrín, M., et al. (2020). Jumping to conclusions in autism: integration of contextual information and confidence in decision-making processes. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 29, 959–968. doi: 10.1007/s00787-019-01409-2
Samango-Sprouse, C. A., Stapleton, E. J., Aliabadi, F., Graw, R., Vickers, R., Haskell, K., et al. (2015). Identification of infants at risk for autism spectrum disorder and developmental language delay prior to 12 months. Autism 19, 327–337. doi: 10.1177/1362361314521329
Sargent, Z., and Jaswal, V. K. (2022). “It's okay if you flap your hands”: Non-autistic children do not object to individual unconventional behaviors associated with autism. Soc. Dev. 31, 1211–1230. doi: 10.1111/sode.12600
Sarrett, J. C. (2011). Trapped children: Popular images of children with autism in the 1960s and 2000s. J. Med. Humanit. 32, 141–153. doi: 10.1007/s10912-010-9135-z
Saure, E., Castrén, M., Mikkola, K., and Salmi, J. (2023). Intellectual disabilities moderate sex/gender differences in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 67, 1–34.
Scheeren, A. M., Koot, H. M., Mundy, P. C., Mous, L., and Begeer, S. (2013). Empathic responsiveness of children and adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 6, 362–371. doi: 10.1002/aur.1299
Schuck, R. K., Dwyer, P., Baiden, K. M., Williams, Z. J., and Wang, M. (2024). Social validity of pivotal response treatment for young autistic children: perspectives of autistic adults. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 54, 423–441. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05808-4
Schunke, O., Schöttle, D., Vettorazzi, E., Brandt, V., Kahl, U., Bäumer, T., et al. (2016). Mirror me: imitative responses in adults with autism. Autism 20, 134–144. doi: 10.1177/1362361315571757
Schwartz, S., Wang, L., Shinn-Cunningham, B. G., and Tager-Flusberg, H. (2020). Neural evidence for speech processing deficits during a cocktail party scenario in minimally and low verbal adolescents and young adults with autism. Autism Res. 13, 1828–1842.
Schwartzman, B., Kapp, S. K., and Wood, J. (2015). “Sensory processing sensitivities and personality in adults with and without ASD,” in Poster Presented at the International Society for Autism Research (Salt Lake City: International Society for Autism Research).
Schwarzer, G. (2014). How motor and visual experiences shape infants' visual processing of objects and faces. Child Dev. Perspect. 8, 213–217. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12093
Seal, B. C., and Bonvillian, J. D. (1997). Sign language and motor functioning in students with autistic disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 27, 437–466. doi: 10.1023/A:1025809506097
Shafer, R. L., Wang, Z., Bartolotti, J., and Mosconi, M. W. (2021). Visual and somatosensory feedback mechanisms of precision manual motor control in autism spectrum disorder. J. Neurodev. Disord. 13, 1–17. doi: 10.1186/s11689-021-09381-2
Sharda, M., Subhadra, T. P., Sahay, S., Nagaraja, C., Singh, L., Mishra, R., et al. (2010). Sounds of melody—Pitch patterns of speech in autism. Neurosci. Lett. 478, 42–45. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.04.066
Sharer, E. A., Mostofsky, S. H., Pascual-Leone, A., and Oberman, L. M. (2016). Isolating visual and proprioceptive components of motor sequence learning in ASD. Autism Res. 9, 563–569. doi: 10.1002/aur.1537
Sheldrick, R. C., Neger, E. N., Shipman, D., and Perrin, E. C. (2012). Quality of life of adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: concordance among adolescents' self-reports, parents' reports, and parents' proxy reports. Qual. Life Res. 21, 53–57. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9916-5
Shic, F., Macari, S., and Chawarska, K. (2014). Speech disturbs face scanning in 6-month-old infants who develop autism spectrum disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 75, 231–237. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.07.009
Shield, A., and Meier, R. P. (2012). Palm reversal errors in native-signing children with autism. J. Commun. Disord. 45, 439–454. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.08.004
Shield, A., Pyers, J., Martin, A., and Tager-Flusberg, H. (2016). Relations between language and cognition in native-signing children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 9, 1304–1315. doi: 10.1002/aur.1621
Shipman, D. L., Sheldrick, R. C., and Perrin, E. C. (2011). Quality of life in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: Reliability and validity of self-reports. J. Dev. Behav. Pediat. 32, 85–89. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e318203e558
Shuster, C. L., Brennan, P. A., Carter, B. S., Check, J., D'Sa, V., Graff, J. C., et al. (2024). Developmental characteristics and accuracy of autism screening among two-year-old toddlers in the ECHO program. Pediatr. Res. 96, 1052–1061. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03193-5
Sibeoni, J., Massoutier, L., Valette, M., Manolios, E., Verneuil, L., Speranza, M., et al. (2022). The sensory experiences of autistic people: a metasynthesis. Autism 26, 1032–1045. doi: 10.1177/13623613221081188
Simeoli, R., Rega, A., and Marocco, D. (2019). Micro-movement as an objective measure to assess autism spectrum disorder. QWERTY-Interdiscipl. J. Technol. Cult. Educ. 14, 49–65. doi: 10.30557/QW000017
Simmons, D. R., Robertson, A. E., McKay, L. S., Toal, E., McAleer, P., and Pollick, F. E. (2009). Vision in autism spectrum disorders. Vision Res. 49, 2705–2739. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.005
Simonoff, E., Kent, R., Stringer, D., Lord, C., Briskman, J., Lukito, S., et al. (2020). Trajectories in symptoms of autism and cognitive ability in autism from childhood to adult life: findings from a longitudinal epidemiological cohort. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 59, 1342–1352. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.11.020
Sinclair, J. (1993). Don't mourn for us. Our Voice. Available online at: http://www.autreat.com/dont_mourn.html (accessed January 13, 2025).
Sinclair, J. (2005). Autism Network International: The Development of a Community and Its Culture. Available online at: https://www.autreat.com/History_of_ANI.html (accessed January 14, 2025).
Skaletski, E. C., Barry, K., Dennis, E., Donnelly, R., Huerta, C., Jones, A., et al. (2024). Sensorimotor features and daily living skills in autistic children with and without ADHD. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 55, 1088–1100. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06394-3
Smith, J. R., Lim, S., Bindra, S., Marler, S., Rajah, B., Williams, Z. J., et al. (2025). Longitudinal symptom burden and pharmacologic management of catatonia in autism with intellectual disability: an observational study. Autism Res. 18, 449–462. doi: 10.1002/aur.3315
Smith, L. E., Maenner, M. J., and Seltzer, M. M. (2012). Developmental trajectories in adolescents and adults with autism: the case of daily living skills. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 51, 622–631. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.03.001
Smith, R. E., Avery, J. A., Wallace, G. L., Kenworthy, L., Gotts, S. J., and Martin, A. (2019). Sex differences in resting-state functional connectivity of the cerebellum in autism spectrum disorder. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13:104. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00104
Solomon, M., Frank, M. J., Ragland, J. D., Smith, A. C., Niendam, T. A., Lesh, T. A., et al. (2015). Feedback-driven trial-by-trial learning in autism spectrum disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 172, 173–181. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14010036
Sowden, S., Koehne, S., Catmur, C., Dziobek, I., and Bird, G. (2016). Intact automatic imitation and typical spatial compatibility in autism spectrum disorder: challenging the broken mirror theory. Autism Res. 9, 292–300. doi: 10.1002/aur.1511
Spencer, J. P., Clearfield, M., Corbetta, D., Ulrich, B., Buchanan, P., and Schöner, G. (2006). Moving toward a grand theory of development: in memory of Esther Thelen. Child Dev. 77, 1521–1538. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00955.x
Spengler, S., Bird, G., and Brass, M. (2010). Hyperimitation of actions is related to reduced understanding of others' minds in autism spectrum conditions. Biol. Psychiatry 68, 1148–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.017
Ssucharewa, G. E. (1927). Die Besonderheiten der schizoiden Psychopathien bei den Mädchen. Monatsschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie 68, 73–92.
Stevenson, R. A., Segers, M., Ferber, S., Barense, M. D., Camarata, S., and Wallace, M. T. (2016). Keeping time in the brain: autism spectrum disorder and audiovisual temporal processing. Autism Res. 9, 720–738. doi: 10.1002/aur.1566
Steward, R., Crane, L., Roy, E. M., Remington, A., and Pellicano, E. (2020). ““Life is much more difficult to manage during periods”: autistic experiences of menstruation,” in The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies (Singapore: Palgrave Macmillian), 751–761.
Stoit, A. M., van Schie, H. T., Slaats-Willemse, D. I., and Buitelaar, J. K. (2013). Grasping motor impairments in autism: not action planning but movement execution is deficient. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 43, 2793–2806. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1825-8
Stone, W. L., and Yoder, P. J. (2001). Predicting spoken language level in children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism 5, 341–361. doi: 10.1177/1362361301005004002
Stoodley, C. J. (2014). Distinct regions of the cerebellum show gray matter decreases in autism, ADHD, and developmental dyslexia. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8:92. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00092
Stuart, N., Whitehouse, A., Palermo, R., Bothe, E., and Badcock, N. (2023). Eye gaze in autism spectrum disorder: a review of neural evidence for the eye avoidance hypothesis. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 53, 1884–1905. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05443-z
Sukhareva, G. E. (1925). “Shizoidnyye psixopatii v detskom vozraste [Schizoid personaity disorders of childhood],” in Voprosy pedologii i detskoi psikhonevrologii, ed. M. O. Gurevich (Moscow: Zhizn' i Znanie), 157–187.
Sulek, R., Edwards, C., Monk, R., Patrick, L., Pillar, S., Whitehouse, A. J., et al. (2024). ‘It depends entirely on the nature of those supports': community perceptions of the appropriateness of early support services for autistic children. Autism 2024:13623613241302372. doi: 10.1177/13623613241302372
Supekar, K., and Menon, V. (2015). Sex differences in structural organization of motor systems and their dissociable links with repetitive/restricted behaviors in children with autism. Mol. Autism 6, 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s13229-015-0042-z
Surgent, O., Guerrero-Gonzalez, J., Dean III, D. C., Adluru, N., Kirk, G. R., Kecskemeti, S. R., et al. (2024). Microstructural neural correlates of maximal grip strength in autistic children: the role of the cortico-cerebellar network and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder features. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 18:1359099. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2024.1359099
Surgent, O., Riaz, A., Ausderau, K. K., Adluru, N., Kirk, G. R., Guerrero-Gonzalez, J., et al. (2022). Brainstem white matter microstructure is associated with hyporesponsiveness and overall sensory features in autistic children. Mol. Autism 13:48. doi: 10.1186/s13229-022-00524-3
Suskind, R. (2014). Life, Animated: A Story of Sidekicks, Heroes, and Autism. Glendale, CA: Disney Publishing Worldwide.
Sussman, D., Leung, R. C., Vogan, V. M., Lee, W., Trelle, S., Lin, S., et al. (2015). The autism puzzle: Diffuse but not pervasive neuroanatomical abnormalities in children with ASD. NeuroImage: Clini. 8, 170–179. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.04.008
Sutera, S., Pandey, J., Esser, E. L., Rosenthal, M. A., Wilson, L. B., Barton, M., et al. (2007). Predictors of optimal outcome in toddlers diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 37, 98–107. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0340-6
Swartz, J. R., Wiggins, J. L., Carrasco, M., Lord, C., and Monk, C. S. (2013). Amygdala habituation and prefrontal functional connectivity in youth with autism spectrum disorders. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc Psychiatry 52, 84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.10.012
Swettenham, J., Remington, A., Murphy, P., Feuerstein, M., Grim, K., and Lavie, N. (2014). Seeing the unseen: autism involves reduced susceptibility to inattentional blindness. Neuropsychology 28, 563–570. doi: 10.1037/neu0000042
Takarae, Y., Minshew, N. J., Luna, B., and Sweeney, J. A. (2004). Oculomotor abnormalities parallel cerebellar histopathology in autism. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 75, 1359–1361. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.022491
Tan, C., Frewer, V., Cox, G., Williams, K., and Ure, A. (2021). Prevalence and age of onset of regression in children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analytical update. Autism Res. 14, 582–598. doi: 10.1002/aur.2463
Tanner, A., and Dounavi, K. (2021). The emergence of autism symptoms prior to 18 months of age: A systematic literature review. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 51, 973–993. doi: 10.1007/s10803-020-04618-w
Tardif, C., Lainé, F., Rodriguez, M., and Gepner, B. (2007). Slowing down presentation of facial movements and vocal sounds enhances facial expression recognition and induces facial–vocal imitation in children with autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 37, 1469–1484. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0223-x
Taylor, S. C., Gehringer, B. N., Dow, H. C., Langer, A., Rawot, E., Smernoff, Z., et al. (2024). Contrasting views of autism spectrum traits in adults, especially in self-reports vs. informant-reports for women high in autism spectrum traits. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 54, 1088–1100. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05822-6
Thelen, E. (1995). Motor development: a new synthesis. Am. Psychologist 50, 79–95. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.50.2.79
Thelen, E. (2005). Dynamic systems theory and the complexity of change. Psychoanal. Dialogues 15, 255–283. doi: 10.1080/10481881509348831
Thelen, E., and Fisher, D. M. (1982). Newborn stepping: an explanation for a “disappearing” reflex. Dev. Psychol. 18:760–775. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.18.5.760
Thelen, E., and Spencer, J. P. (1998). Postural control during reaching in young infants: a dynamic systems approach. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 22, 507–514. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(97)00037-7
Thérien, V. D., Degré-Pelletier, J., Barbeau, E. B., Samson, F., and Soulières, I. (2022). Differential neural correlates underlying mental rotation processes in two distinct cognitive profiles in autism. NeuroImage: Clini. 36:103221. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103221
Thérien, V. D., Degré-Pelletier, J., Barbeau, E. B., Samson, F., and Soulières, I. (2023). Different levels of visuospatial abilities linked to differential brain correlates underlying visual mental segmentation processes in autism. Cereb. Cortex 33, 9186–9211. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad195
Thomas, H. R. (2023). Sensory Symptoms and Internalizing Symptoms and Disorders in Individuals Who Have Lost the Clinical Autism Diagnosis (Doctoral diss). University of Connecticut.
Thorup, E., Bölte, S., and Falck-Ytter, T. (2024). Less frequent face looking in infancy is related to autism likelihood status but not diagnosis: a study of parent-infant interaction. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 115:102422. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2024.102422
Tierney, C., Mayes, S., Lohs, S. R., Black, A., Gisin, E., and Veglia, M. (2015). How valid is the checklist for autism spectrum disorder when a child has apraxia of speech? J. Dev. Behav. Pediat. 36, 569–574. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000189
Tomaszewski, B., Klein, C. B., Meyer, A. T., Lamarche, E., and Klinger, L. G. (2025). Developmental trajectories of adaptive behavior from toddlerhood to middle adulthood in autism. Autism Adulthood. doi: 10.1089/aut.2024.0036
Torres, E. B., Brincker, M., Isenhower, R. W., Yanovich, P., Stigler, K. A., Nurnberger, J. I., et al. (2013a). Autism: the micro-movement perspective. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 7:32. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00032
Torres, E. B., Caballero, C., and Mistry, S. (2020). Aging with autism departs greatly from typical aging. Sensors 20:572. doi: 10.3390/s20020572
Torres, E. B., Isenhower, R. W., Yanovich, P., Rehrig, G., Stigler, K., Nurnberger, J., et al. (2013b). Strategies to develop putative biomarkers to characterize the female phenotype with autism spectrum disorders. J. Neurophysiol. 110, 1646–1662. doi: 10.1152/jn.00059.2013
Torres, E. B., Varkey, H., Vero, J., London, E., Phan, H., Kittler, P., et al. (2023). Sensing echoes: temporal misalignment in auditory brainstem responses as the earliest marker of neurodevelopmental derailment. PNAS Nexus 2:pgac315. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac315
Tottenham, N., Hertzig, M. E., Gillespie-Lynch, K., Gilhooly, T., Millner, A. J., and Casey, B. J. (2014). Elevated amygdala response to faces and gaze aversion in autism spectrum disorder. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9, 106–117. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst050
Travers, B. G., Bigler, E. D., Tromp, D. P., Adluru, N., Destiche, D., Samsin, D., et al. (2015). Brainstem white matter predicts individual differences in manual motor difficulties and symptom severity in autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 45, 3030–3040. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2467-9
Travers, B. G., Powell, P. S., Klinger, L. G., and Klinger, M. R. (2013). Motor difficulties in autism spectrum disorder: linking symptom severity and postural stability. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 43, 1568–1583. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1702-x
Trimmer, E., McDonald, S., and Rushby, J. A. (2017). Not knowing what I feel: emotional empathy in autism spectrum disorders. Autism 21, 450–457. doi: 10.1177/1362361316648520
Troyb, E., Orinstein, A., Tyson, K., Eigsti, I. M., Naigles, L., and Fein, D. (2014). Restricted and repetitive behaviors in individuals with a history of ASDs who have achieved optimal outcomes. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 44, 3168–3184. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2182-y
Tsang, T., Green, S. A., Liu, J., Lawrence, K., Jeste, S., Bookheimer, S. Y., et al. (2024). Salience network connectivity is altered in 6-week-old infants at heightened likelihood for developing autism. Commun. Biol. 7:485. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06016-9
Tyndall, I., Ragless, L., and O'Hora, D. (2018). Effects of perceptual load and socially meaningful stimuli on crossmodal selective attention in Autism Spectrum Disorder and neurotypical samples. Conscious. Cogn. 60, 25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.02.006
Uddin, L. Q., Supekar, K., Lynch, C. J., Khouzam, A., Phillips, J., Feinstein, C., et al. (2013). Salience network–based classification and prediction of symptom severity in children with autism. JAMA Psychiatry 70, 869–879. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.104
Unruh, K. E., Bartolotti, J. V., McKinney, W. S., Schmitt, L. M., Sweeney, J. A., and Mosconi, M. W. (2023). Functional connectivity of cortical-cerebellar networks in relation to sensorimotor behavior and clinical features in autism spectrum disorder. Cereb. Cortex 33, 8990–9002. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad177
Ure, A. M., Treyvaud, K., Thompson, D. K., Pascoe, L., Roberts, G., Lee, K. J., et al. (2016). Neonatal brain abnormalities associated with autism spectrum disorder in children born very preterm. Autism Res. 9, 543–552. doi: 10.1002/aur.1558
Vakorin, V. A., Doesburg, S. M., Leung, R. C., Vogan, V. M., Anagnostou, E., and Taylor, M. J. (2017). Developmental changes in neuromagnetic rhythms and network synchrony in autism. Ann. Neurol. 81, 199–211. doi: 10.1002/ana.24836
Van der Hallen, R., Evers, K., Brewaeys, K., Van den Noortgate, W., and Wagemans, J. (2015). Global processing takes time: a meta-analysis on local–global visual processing in ASD. Psychol. Bull. 141, 549–573. doi: 10.1037/bul0000004
Van der Hallen, R., Manning, C., Evers, K., and Wagemans, J. (2019). Global motion perception in autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 49, 4901–4918. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-04194-8
Van der Plas, E., Mason, D., and Happ,é, F. (2023). Decision-making in autism: A narrative review. Autism 27, 1532–1546. doi: 10.1177/13623613221148010
Van Etten, H. M., Kaur, M., Srinivasan, S. M., Cohen, S. J., Bhat, A., and Dobkins, K. R. (2017). Increased prevalence of unusual sensory behaviors in infants at risk for, and teens with, autism spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 47, 3431–3445. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3227-9
Vanaken, G. J. (2023). Affirming Neurodiversity: a Study on the Ethics of Early Autism Detection and Intervention (Doctoral dissertation). University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
VanDaalen, R. A., Dillon, F. R., Santos, C. E., and Capielo Rosario, C. (2025). Development and initial validation of the Autism and Neurodiversity Attitudes Scale. Autism Adulthood 7, 39–51. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0090
Vanvuchelen, M., Roeyers, H., and De Weerdt, W. (2007). Nature of motor imitation problems in school-aged boys with autism: a motor or a cognitive problem? Autism 11, 225–240. doi: 10.1177/1362361307076846
Vashdi, E., Avramov, A., Pela, Å., Huang, Y. C., Jiang, P. R., and Paula Teodora, M (2021). New insights into CAS population profile and interaction with autism—a wide retrospective research. BRAIN 11, 182–196. doi: 10.18662/brain/11.3Sup1/134
Veness, C., Prior, M. R., Bavin, E., Eadie, P., Cini, E., and Reilly, S. (2012). Early indicators of autism spectrum disorders at 12 and 24 months of age: A prospective, longitudinal comparative study. Autism 16, 163–177. doi: 10.1177/1362361311399936
Verly, M., Verhoeven, J., Zink, I., Mantini, D., Peeters, R., Deprez, S., et al. (2014). Altered functional connectivity of the language network in ASD: role of classical language areas and cerebellum. NeuroImage: Clini. 4, 374–382. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.01.008
Vernazza-Martin, S., Martin, N., Vernazza, A., Lepellec-Muller, A., Rufo, M., Massion, J., et al. (2005). Goal directed locomotion and balance control in autistic children. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 35, 91–102. doi: 10.1007/s10803-004-1037-3
Wagner, J. B., Luyster, R. J., Moustapha, H., Tager-Flusberg, H., and Nelson, C. A. (2018). Differential attention to faces in infant siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder and associations with later social and language ability. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 42, 83–92. doi: 10.1177/0165025416673475
Wagner, J. B., Luyster, R. J., Tager-Flusberg, H., and Nelson, C. A. (2016). Greater pupil size in response to emotional faces as an early marker of social-communicative difficulties in infants at high risk for autism. Infancy 21, 560–581. doi: 10.1111/infa.12128
Waizbard-Bartov, E., and Miller, M. (2023). Does the severity of autism symptoms change over time? A review of the evidence, impacts, and gaps in current knowledge. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 99:102230. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102230
Wan, C. Y., Wood, A. G., Reutens, D. C., and Wilson, S. J. (2010). Congenital blindness leads to enhanced vibrotactile perception. Neuropsychologia 48, 631–635. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.001
Wan, M. W., Green, J., Elsabbagh, M., Johnson, M., Charman, T., Plummer, F., et al. (2013). Quality of interaction between at-risk infants and caregiver at 12-15 months is associated with 3-year autism outcome. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 54, 763–771. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12032
Wan, M. W., Green, J., and Scott, J. (2019). A systematic review of parent–infant interaction in infants at risk of autism. Autism 23, 811–820. doi: 10.1177/1362361318777484
Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Sweeney, J. A., Gong, Q., Lui, S., and Mosconi, M. W. (2019). Resting-state brain network dysfunctions associated with visuomotor impairments in autism spectrum disorder. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 13:17. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2019.00017
Washington, A. M., Mercer, A. H., Burrows, C. A., Dager, S. R., Elison, J. T., Estes, A. M., et al. (2024). Parent attitudes towards predictive testing for autism in the first year of life. J. Neurodev. Disord. 16:47. doi: 10.1186/s11689-024-09561-w
Wass, S. V., Jones, E. J., Gliga, T., Smith, T. J., Charman, T., Johnson, M. H., et al. (2015). Shorter spontaneous fixation durations in infants with later emerging autism. Sci. Rep. 5:8284. doi: 10.1038/srep08284
Webb, S. J., Sparks, B. F., Friedman, S. D., Shaw, D. W., Giedd, J., Dawson, G., et al. (2009). Cerebellar vermal volumes and behavioral correlates in children with autism spectrum disorder. Psychiatry Res.: Neuroimag. 172, 61–67. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2008.06.001
Weisberg, J., Milleville, S. C., Kenworthy, L., Wallace, G. L., Gotts, S. J., Beauchamp, M. S., et al. (2014). Social perception in autism spectrum disorders: impaired category selectivity for dynamic but not static images in ventral temporal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 24, 37–48. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs276
West, K. L. (2019). Infant motor development in autism spectrum disorder: A synthesis and meta-analysis. Child Dev. 90, 2053–2070. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13086
West, K. L., Steward, E., Roemer Britsch, E., and Iverson, J. M. (2024). Infant communication across the transition to walking: developmental cascades among infant siblings of children with autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 54, 2847–2859. doi: 10.1007/s10803-023-06030-6
Whitaker, L., Jones, C. R., Wilkins, A. J., and Roberson, D. (2016). Judging the intensity of emotional expression in faces: the effects of colored tints on individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 9, 450–459. doi: 10.1002/aur.1506
Whitehouse, A. J., Varcin, K. J., Pillar, S., Billingham, W., Alvares, G. A., Barbaro, J., et al. (2021). Effect of preemptive intervention on developmental outcomes among infants showing early signs of autism: a randomized clinical trial of outcomes to diagnosis. JAMA Pediatr. 175, e213298–e213298. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.3298
Wiggins, J. L., Swartz, J. R., Martin, D. M., Lord, C., and Monk, C. S. (2014). Serotonin transporter genotype impacts amygdala habituation in youth with autism spectrum disorders. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9, 832–838. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst039
Wigham, S., Rodgers, J., South, M., McConachie, H., and Freeston, M. (2015). The interplay between sensory processing abnormalities, intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety and restricted and repetitive behaviours in autism spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 45, 943–952. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2248-x
Wild, K. S., Poliakoff, E., Jerrison, A., and Gowen, E. (2012). Goal-directed and goal-less imitation in autism spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 42, 1739–1749. doi: 10.1007/s10803-011-1417-4
Williams, K. L., Dumont, R. L., Schiano, N. R., Lawlor, K. F., Greaney, K., Kim, R., et al. (2024). Use of sensory adaptive environments with autistic children: a scoping review. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 114:102362. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2024.102362
Williams, Z. J., Schaaf, R., Ausderau, K. K., Baranek, G. T., Barrett, D. J., Cascio, C. J., et al. (2023). Examining the latent structure and correlates of sensory reactivity in autism: a multi-site integrative data analysis by the autism sensory research consortium. Mol. Autism 14:31. doi: 10.1186/s13229-023-00563-4
Williamson, S., Craig, J., and Slinger, R. (2008). Exploring the relationship between measures of self-esteem and psychological adjustment among adolescents with Asperger syndrome. Autism 12, 391–402. doi: 10.1177/1362361308091652
Wilson, R. B., Burdekin, E. D., Jackson, N. J., Hughart, L., Anderson, J., Dusing, S. C., et al. (2024). Slower pace in early walking onset is related to communication, motor skills, and adaptive function in autistic toddlers. Autism Res. 17, 27–36. doi: 10.1002/aur.3067
Wolff, J. J., Gerig, G., Lewis, J. D., Soda, T., Styner, M. A., Vachet, C., et al. (2015). Altered corpus callosum morphology associated with autism over the first 2 years of life. Brain 138, 2046–2058. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv118
Wolff, J. J., Gu, H., Gerig, G., Elison, J. T., Styner, M., Gouttard, S., et al. (2012). Differences in white matter fiber tract development present from 6 to 24 months in infants with autism. Am. J. Psychiatry 169, 589–600. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11091447
Wolff, J. J., Swanson, M. R., Elison, J. T., Gerig, G., Pruett, J. R., Styner, M. A., et al. (2017). Neural circuitry at age 6 months associated with later repetitive behavior and sensory responsiveness in autism. Mol. Autism 8, 1–12. doi: 10.1186/s13229-017-0126-z
Yechiam, E., Arshavsky, O., Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Yaniv, S., and Aharon, J. (2010). Adapted to explore: Reinforcement learning in autistic spectrum conditions. Brain Cogn. 72, 317–324. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.10.005
Yi, T., Ji, C., Wei, W., Wu, G., Jin, K., and Jiang, G. (2024). Cortical-cerebellar circuits changes in preschool ASD children by multimodal MRI. Cereb. Cortex 34:bhae090. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae090
Young, G. S., Merin, N., Rogers, S. J., and Ozonoff, S. (2009). Gaze behavior and affect at 6 months: predicting clinical outcomes and language development in typically developing infants and infants at risk for autism. Dev. Sci. 12, 798–814. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00833.x
Yurkovic-Harding, J., Lisandrelli, G., Shaffer, R. C., Dominick, K. C., Pedapati, E. V., Erickson, C. A., et al. (2022). Children with ASD establish joint attention during free-flowing toy play without face looks. Curr. Biol. 32, 2739–2746. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.04.044
Zampella, C. J., Wang, L. A., Haley, M., Hutchinson, A. G., and de Marchena, A. (2021). Motor skill differences in autism spectrum disorder: a clinically focused review. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 23:64. doi: 10.1007/s11920-021-01280-6
Zappella, M., Einspieler, C., Bartl-Pokorny, K. D., Krieber, M., Coleman, M., Bölte, S., et al. (2015). What do home videos tell us about early motor and sociocommunicative behaviours in children with autistic features during the second year of life—an exploratory study. Early Hum. Dev. 91, 569–575. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.07.006
Zhang, D., Bedogni, F., Boterberg, S., Camfield, C., Camfield, P., Charman, T., et al. (2019). Towards a consensus on developmental regression. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 107, 3–5. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.08.014
Zhang, W., Li, X., Yao, J., Ye, Q., and Peng, W. (2021). Abnormalities in pain sensitivity among individuals with autism spectrum disorder: evidence from meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica Sinica 53:613. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00613
Zhao, S., Liu, Y., and Wei, K. (2022). Pupil-linked arousal response reveals aberrant attention regulation among children with autism spectrum disorder. J. Neurosci. 42, 5427–5437. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0223-22.2022
Zhou, X., Siddiqui, H., and Rutherford, M. D. (2025). Face perception and social cognitive development in early autism: a prospective longitudinal study from 3 months to 7 years of age. Child Dev. 96, 104–121. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14144
Ziv, I., Avni, I., Dinstein, I., Meiri, G., and Bonneh, Y. S. (2024). Oculomotor randomness is higher in autistic children and increases with the severity of symptoms. Autism Res. 17, 249–265. doi: 10.1002/aur.3083
Zwaigenbaum, L. (2019). Perspectives on regressive onset in autism: Looking forward on looking back. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 103, 399–400. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.025
Zwaigenbaum, L., Bryson, S., Rogers, T., Roberts, W., Brian, J., and Szatmari, P. (2005). Behavioral manifestations of autism in the first year of life. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 23, 143–152. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2004.05.001
Keywords: autism, sensory, motor, development, regression, lost autism diagnosis, neurodiversity, support
Citation: Kapp SK (2025) Sensory–movement underpinnings of lifelong neurodivergence: getting a grip on autism. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 19:1489322. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2025.1489322
Received: 31 August 2024; Accepted: 14 March 2025;
Published: 14 April 2025.
Edited by:
Elizabeth B. Torres, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, United StatesReviewed by:
Luigi Balasco, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, ItalyBrittany Travers, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States
Copyright © 2025 Kapp. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Steven K. Kapp, c3RldmVuLmthcHBAcG9ydC5hYy51aw==