EDITORIAL article
Front. Integr. Neurosci.
Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnint.2025.1629851
This article is part of the Research TopicThe Primate’s Sensorimotor System and its Relationship with Emotion, Cognition, and Decision-MakingView all 7 articles
Editorial: The Primate's Sensorimotor System and its Relationship with Emotion, Cognition, and Decision-Making
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
- 2Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
In line with this framework, results from Ishida et al. (2024), based on neuronal recordings in monkeys, reveal that regions within the posterior perisylvian sulcus, the secondary somatosensory cortex, and the posterior insular cortex, once thought to be exclusively involved in passive sensory integration, actually play a critical role in sensorimotor integration during grasping and object manipulation. The authors suggest that these findings support the hypothesis that these areas are involved in complex sensorimotor processes subserving predictive modelling and attentional modulation.These discoveries align with the longstanding view, supported by extensive neuroimaging and electrophysiological evidence, that the insula has a complex functional profile and participates in several sensorimotor networks. Accordingly, a study within this Research Topic by Sypré et al. (2024) employed a data-driven clustering approach to subdivide the macaque insula into fields based on the similarity of each voxel's functional connectivity profile. Specifically, this approach enabled the attribution of each insular field to relatively distinct functional circuits: the anterior field was linked to mouth motor and gustatory networks; the intermediate dorsal field to the grasping network; the intermediate ventral field to regions involved in social and affiliative processing; and the posterior field to optic flow and vestibular networks. By integrating these resting-state-derived subdivisions with task-based and seed-to-brain fMRI results, the authors also demonstrated specialized roles of the various insular fields in gustatory, somatomotor, vestibular, and social visual processing.In addition to the insular cortex, another brain region recently shown to be involved in many sensorimotor processes, and whose expansion in both humans and non-human primates has significantly contributed to the sophistication of the sensorimotor repertoire, is the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPF). Neuroanatomical studies have revealed that the caudal regions of the LPF connect mainly to parietal and prearcuate oculomotor areas, the middle regions to parietal and frontal skeletomotor areas, and the rostral region chiefly to other prefrontal areas. To explore whether this LPF connectional organization is reflected in subcortical structures, Borra et al. ( 2023) examined the projection patterns from the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus (MD) to the LPF. Coherently with the hypothesis, the study revealed a topographic organization of LPF projections to the MD that mirrors the aforementioned rostrocaudal gradient.These results highlight how distributed thalamocortical circuits support outcome monitoring, rule implementation, and sensorimotor transformation, delineating specific subcortical routes through which cognition exerts top-down modulation over motor behaviour.While the prefrontal cortex is an associative region where abstract rules are used to guide appropriate context dependent behaviours, the posterior parietal cortex, whose late evolutionary expansion parallels the increasing sensorimotor complexity of primate behaviour, serves as a central hub for integration sensory and action information. Within this cortex, the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) is part of a circuit involved in the transformation of visual inputs into coordinated saccadic eye movements. Brunamonti and Paré (2023) recorded LIP neuronal activity in rhesus monkeys performing both a delayed saccade task and a countermanding task, requiring either execution or inhibition of a planned saccade after a stop signal, to further clarify the role of LIP in oculomotor control. They found that LIP activity did not modulate during the critical window for saccade cancellation, suggesting that LIP serves primarily as a hub for attentional mapping and corollary discharge, rather than as a direct motor initiator.Together, these studies demonstrate that the sensorimotor system operates within a distributed, hierarchically organized network that enables real-time interaction between physical action, emotional salience, and cognitive load, thus redefining what it means for a brain region to be "motor" or "sensory."The goal of studies on the monkey brain is to translate the knowledge gained into understanding the human species, as non-human primates represent our closest evolutionary relatives. They possess remarkable manual abilities and live in complex social environments, making them highly valuable models for investigating the neural mechanisms underlying action, cognition, and social interaction. In this respect, Gambaretti et al. (2025) andTariciotti et al. (2024) provide critical syntheses that extend the experimental findings on monkeys into clinical domains. The first study underscores how foundational research in non-human primates has shaped the development of intraoperative brain mapping, particularly through refined electrical stimulation techniques aimed at preserving motor functions during tumor resection. The second offers a systematic synthesis of the neural substrates underlying object-oriented hand dexterity across species, bridging functional imaging with recent data obtained in awake neurosurgical patients. Together, they outline how the distributed nature of sensorimotor control, grounded in comparative primate studies, has transformed neurosurgical approaches, particularly in the preservation of corticospinal pathways and parietofrontal circuits subserving praxis, executive functions, and goal-directed motor abilities during glioma resection.Localizing and preserving these anatomo-functional building blocks during neurosurgery is crucial for ensuring post-operative quality of life. Their work underscores a key message: evolutionarily conserved structures have been co-opted and elaborated in humans to subserve higher-order cognition and complex motor behaviours. In summary, the six studies featured in this Special Issue collectively emphasize that the sensorimotor system is not merely a means of interacting with the external world, but a dynamic interface where action and multiple cognitive domains converge. On one hand, the presence of such integrative, large-scale neural architectures in both human and non-human primates reinforces the principle of evolutionary continuity; on the other, the expansion and reorganization of these neural networks in humans underpin the emergence of uniquely human socio-cognitive behaviours. Understanding this duality, of conservation and divergence, is essential to understanding ourselves.
Keywords: integrative neuroscience, Sensorimotor control, Comparative cognition, Parieto-frontal circuits, Comparative behavior
Received: 16 May 2025; Accepted: 23 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Simone, Gerbella and Fornia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Luciano Simone, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
Marzio Gerbella, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
Luca Fornia, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.