Abstract
Santiago Ramón y Cajal developed a great body of scientific research during the last decade of 19th century, mainly between 1888 and 1892, when he published more than 30 manuscripts. The neuronal theory, the structure of dendrites and spines, and fine microscopic descriptions of numerous neural circuits are among these studies. In addition, numerous cell types (neuronal and glial) were described by Ramón y Cajal during this time using this “reazione nera” or Golgi method. Among these neurons were the special cells of the molecular layer of the neocortex. These cells were also termed Cajal cells or Retzius cells by other colleagues. Today these cells are known as Cajal–Retzius cells. From the earliest description, several biological aspects of these fascinating cells have been analyzed (e.g., cell morphology, physiological properties, origin and cellular fate, putative function during cortical development, etc). In this review we will summarize in a temporal basis the emerging knowledge concerning this cell population with specific attention the pioneer studies of Santiago Ramón y Cajal.
INTRODUCTION
Today it is generally accepted that Santiago Ramón y Cajal’s (1852–1934) studies, in particular the neuronal theory, should be considered the beginning of modern neurobiology (; ; ). Thus, numerous aspects of Cajal’s activities, from a point of view of both scientific and academic, have been largely described in several manuscripts, reviews and books. Some of them focused on determining the relevance of Cajal’s technological advance to current neurobiology (; ). Today, when we characterize “translational research” as a robust pillar of an appropriate scientific strategy we should note, if we look at Cajal’s notes, that this vision is not new. In fact, it was also developed by Cajal, among others, during his scientific career. In science, the development of new methods and their implementation as translational tools for research is one of the mandatory in the face of new challenging issues regarding how to obtain relevant scientific data. As indicated, this vision was one of the greatest and most relevant contributions of Cajal to the “scientific method,” expanding the descriptive aspects of the method to a more deductive approach, as clearly demonstrated by his drawings. Indeed, this may be seen in the first stage of his research, between 1877 and 1887, and previous to the discovery of the “reazione nera” or Golgi method (Camillo Golgi, 1843–1926), in a visit to the private laboratory of Luis Simarro (1851–1921). Cajal equipped the Anatomy Department (Medical School) of the University of Valencia (1883) and Barcelona (1887) with optical microscopes. These pioneer microscopy units were the result of the privileged microscopic observations of the histological preparations of Aureliano Maestre de San Juan (1828–1890). In fact, we cannot describe the advances of Cajal without making a mention to the microscopic drawings and microphotographs, most of them developed at high magnification and using various histological methods, which meant a challenging issue at that time. However, we should not underestimate his deductive potential since in the hands of Cajal, the Golgi method showed a different neuronal organization from that described by Golgi and other scientists using the same method (). Another relevant aspect of Cajal’s studies was the description of the neuronal architecture by analyzing the development and then degeneration of the nervous system. Thus, during the period from 1887 to 1903, Cajal carried out intense and productive scientific activity, with the help of the Golgi method, in many descriptive aspects not only of mature nervous tissue but also of its development. In this review we would like to present some of the data that Cajal and colleagues published concerning a specific cell type located in the superficial layer of the developing cerebral cortex: the Cajal–Retzius cell. In addition we would like also to consider these results in light of current knowledge of this cell population.
FIRST DESCRIPTIONS OF CAJAL–RETZIUS CELLS: FROM THE CAJAL CELLS OF RETZIUS TO THE HUMAN RETZIUS CELLS OF KÖLLIKER THROUGH THE SPECIAL CELLS OF CAJAL
Cajal–Retzius cells have been extensively analyzed since Cajal first described them in 1890 (Ramón y Cajal, 1890). At that time, he was intrigued by the existence of a dense axonal plexus of nerve fibers that run horizontally to the surface of the cerebral cortex in the molecular layer. Some contemporary neuroanatomists described that these fibers were myelinated and suggested a putative origin for them. For example, Carlo Martinotti (1859–1918) suggested that they originated from the branches of pyramidal axons of the second and third cortical layer (Martinotti, 1890). However, the exact origin of them was unknown due mainly to the limitations of the histological techniques. Moreover, other scientists working on the structure of the neocortex described the presence of cells in layer I as well as the lamination of the human cortex using methylene blue staining without specific descriptions of these cells (Meynert, 1867). Taking advantage of the Golgi method, Cajal studied the composition of the marginal layer in newborn small mammals such as rabbit, cat, dog and rat (Ramón y Cajal, 1890). He observed that these fibers, in contrast to what was contained in Martinotti’s theory, arose mostly from two different cell types present in the same molecular layer: polyhedral and fusiform cells. The first were of medium size with four or five rough dendrite branches that extended in all directions, the axons of which ramified profusely in the most superficial part of the molecular layer. The second neuronal type was thinner and very elongated, with a smooth contour and with an ovoid soma and two opposed branches that extended horizontally over a considerable distance and finally bent and ascended to the cerebral surface. In their horizontal trajectory, their processes produced collateral processes or appendages which terminated in the upper portion of the molecular layer (Figure 1). But surprisingly, under the analysis of Cajal, these cells frequently showed two or three axons that came off the dendritic branches at a great distance from the cell body and then ran opposed and horizontally until they ramified in ascendant collaterals which afterwards turned so as to run horizontally, populating the entire marginal layer. This characteristic led Cajal to refer to them as special cells. Apart from this histological description (Ramón y Cajal, 1890), he took the risk of attributing to them a functional role and considered they might serve as a connection between pyramidal cells from distinct areas of the cortex. Thus, the arborizations of their nerve fibers contacted the apical dendrites of pyramidal cells; for this reason he also conferred upon them the name of superficial cells of association (Ramón y Cajal, 1890, 1891b).
FIGURE 1
Gustaf Retzius (1842–1919) identified these cells in embryos of diverse species (rabbit, cat, and dog) and called them Cajal cells (Cajal’sche Zellen; Retzius, 1893). The first description of these Cajal cells by Retzius was in parallel with the study of another cell type identified by Cajal as “interstitial” cells of the cortical white matter of dogs (Ramón y Cajal, 1891a, 1893). Indeed, Retzius described, in plate I of this publication of 1893, the presence of horizontally fusiform cells similar to those reported by Cajal. However, he failed to identify the same cell type in human fetuses. This led to Rudolph Albert von Kölliker’s (1817–1905) reserving the name of Cajal cells for mammals and employing the term Retzius cells for their human fetal homologues ().
Some years later, the axon-like appearance of the majority of the cellular processes in these cells led Cajal to modify his previous opinion and to consider that these cells lacked a differentiation of processes into axons and dendrites and that they therefore shared the same morphological significance (Ramón y Cajal, 1897). However, the observations of Retzius in human fetuses and of Emilio Veratti (1872–1967) in rabbits (Veratti, 1897), in addition to his own observations obtained with new techniques (methylene blue and reduced silver nitrate methods), led him to give up the notion that these special cells possessed multiple axons and that only one behaved like a legitimate nerve fiber (Ramón y Cajal, 1904). Furthermore, due to the great morphological differences observed between cells from newborn children and fetuses, he concluded that in humans these special cells showed two stages: the fetal and the adult form. According to this theory, most of the fine ascending processes present in the fetal form were destined to atrophy in the days following birth, becoming almost completely absent in post-natal periods and therefore conferring upon these cells their characteristic adult form.
Cajal continued to study these special cells throughout his life in different areas of the human cortex such as visual, motor, olfactory, and acoustic areas, and also in different mammal species, birds, and reptiles, thereby performing the first comparative analysis of them (Ramón y Cajal, 1904, 1911; ).
A SECOND PHASE OF CAJAL–RETZIUS CELL ANALYSIS: CORTICAL LAMINATION STUDIES PREVAIL OVER CAJAL–RETZIUS CELL DESCRIPTIONS
Although Cajal and Retzius exhaustively characterized these cells, the great morphological complexity that they show in different species and in different developmental stages in addition to the random results obtained by the Golgi method have caused great confusion. Numerous studies have been directed to determining other aspects of the developing cortex instead of analyzing in greater detail the biology of Cajal–Retzius cells. For example, when analyzing descriptions of the white matter cells, intermediate zone/subventricular zone, and subplate, Cajal–Retzius cells appear in the published data as being cited but not studied in detail (; Von Economo and Koskinas, 1925; ). Even the appropriate name has become a matter of controversy, and they have received different names such as Cajal cells, Retzius cells and Retzius–Cajal cells (; ). While the debate continued until recent years (Meyer et al., 1999; ), the most widely accepted term today is Cajal–Retzius cells (henceforth CR cells).
THE THIRD PHASE OF CAJAL–RETZIUS CELL STUDIES: GROWING INTEREST IN THE 1970s BECAUSE OF THE INFLUENCE OF THE BOULDER COMMITTEE
In 1970, a group of neurobiologists published a seminal review in Anatomical Record describing the basic principles of the development of the central nervous system (). Although lacking some information (e.g., the subplate was not identified as a developmental layer in the manuscript and CR cells, although mentioned, were not included in the general scheme), the effort at summarizing most of the information obtained during several studies (mainly in humans) was very positive. In fact, the committee assigned the molecular layer a relevant role during cortical development. Following the publication of the manuscript, several studies analyzed the birthdates as well as the ultrastructure of the neuronal and glial populations described in the manuscript (; Rickmann et al., 1977; Shoukimas and Hinds, 1978; ; Sievers and Raedler, 1981). But especially, special attention should be paid to the numerous studies developed by Miguel Marín-Padilla (1930) concerning the structure and development of the primitive plexiform layer/layer I in cats, hamsters, and humans (, ; Marin-Padilla and Marin-Padilla, 1982). In accordance with the original descriptions of Cajal and Retzius, Marin-Padilla, a follower in the trail laid down by Cajal, described the molecular layer as the first cortical lamina to develop during corticogenesis, characterized by the presence of a horizontal plexus of fibers with scattered primitive neurons. More relevantly, Marin-Padilla determined that both fibers and neurons are further split into the superficial (layer I) and deeper layers (layer VII, in human) by the appearance of the cortical plate (). Marin-Padilla’s descriptions of CR cells are based on the use of the Golgi method and are very similar to those reported by Cajal. He described CR cells in the fetal stage as cells with triangular, inverted pyramidal or fusiform cell bodies with two horizontal dendrites with ascending fine branches. The axon of the CR cells bifurcates in layer I and form the tangential fibers of Retzius ().
The controversy about the different morphological features of these cells seems to be resolving gradually due to recent studies employing advanced techniques as in vivo two-photon imaging () and the use of several markers such as Acetyl cholinesterase, Calretinin, Reelin, p73, CxCR4, etc. (; ; ; Figure 2). Nevertheless, the fact that these markers are not really specific for CR implies a huge disadvantage for studying these cells in detail, and therefore the characterization of a real specific marker should be one of the main goals of the researchers in this area.
FIGURE 2
ORIGIN AND MIGRATORY ROUTES OF CR CELLS: A “ROAD RUNNER” IN THE DEVELOPING CORTEX
From the earliest studies, CR cells were thought to be generated in the ventricular region of the pallium (Meyer et al., 1998), while in the classical studies cited above they were described in different cortical regions. Classical descriptions do not discriminate between CR cell morphology and characteristics with respect to their origin. However, by using using Golgi impregnation (Marin-Padilla and Marin-Padilla, 1982) or other techniques such as tritiated thymidine (Parnavelas and Edmunds, 1983), it has been shown how CR cells undergo morphological changes to be transformed into resident layer I cells during cortical development in cats () and primates, including humans (). Thus, the incorporation of CR cells in the preplate came to be considered the result of radial migration during corticogenesis () and this was confirmed by recent studies (). But, recent evidences indicate that rodent CR cells are generated in different neuroproliferative regions of the telencephalon (see below) and that from these sources they migrate tangentially to completely populate the pallium. In summary, we can note that a small percentage of CR cells originate in the neuroepithelium while the majority of them originate outside the pallium. In 1998, an study focused in the subpial granular layer (SGL) in human fetus revealed that one population of Reelin-negative granule neurons from, after arriving in the marginal zone (MZ), differentiates into Reelin-producing neurons with CR morphology (Meyer and Goffinet, 1998). Some years later, analyzing the development and organization of layer I in macaque monkey, it was confirmed that SGL might be a site of origin for late-generated CR cells. Moreover, it was hypothesized that the olfactory primordium gave rise to the SGL in monkey, thereby putting this zone forward as another source of CR cells (Zecevic and Rakic, 2001). An additional source of CR cells was identified on the basis of p73 expression in 2002. In human fetus, at eight gestational weeks, a mediolateral gradient in the density of p73/Reelin-positive neurons in the neocortical MZ suggests that a subset of CR cells migrates tangentially from the cortical hem and taenia tecta (Meyer et al., 2002). The cortical hem as a source for CR in mouse was demonstrated using the IG17 transgenic mouse and in utero electroporation (Takiguchi-Hayashi et al., 2004). Recent studies have reported that cortical hem-derived CR cells mainly populate the dorso-medial regions of the cortex (). Furthermore, in mice in which the cortical hem has been ablated, the MZ contains very few or no cells (neither CR nor other cell types) as well as very low levels of Reelin (Yoshida et al., 2006). In 2005, it was proved the existence of two previously unknown sites of origin for two distinct subsets of CR cells: the ventral pallium at the pallial–subpallial boundary (PSB) and the septum (). Using a knock-in strategy, combined with DiI labeling, they followed the fate of the progeny of Dbx1-derived cells through their entire lifespan. These cells gave rise to Reelin-positive neurons and became CR cells in the post-natal cortex with different characteristics (). The generation of Dbx1-derived cells seems to occur a bit earlier in the septum than in PSB. Moreover, cells migrated from the septum to the medial and piriform cortex and did not express Calretinin, whereas from the PSB they migrated to the dorso-lateral and piriform cortex and expressed Calretinin. More recently, the thalamic eminence (TE) (Takiguchi-Hayashi et al., 2004; ; Meyer, 2010) and the “amygdalar hem” have been proposed as additional putative sites of origin (Meyer, 2010). In fact, in rodent TE-generated cells express markers of CR cells such as Calretinin (), DeltaNp73 (Tissir et al., 2009), and low levels of Reelin (Meyer, 2010). Although their final destination is unknown, they may reach the di-telencephalic sulcus and amygdala. Immediately caudal to the TE, there is another putative source of CR, the “amygdalar hem,” a small triangular area of neuroepithelium that connects the corticomedial amygdala to the choroid plexus at E12 in mice and which is also known as the “strionuclear neuroepithelium” (); cells originating in this area express high levels of Reelin when they are near the pial surface and therefore might represent CR cells whose final destinations are the amygdala and entorhinal cortex (Meyer, 2010). In summary, the cortical hem is the main source for CR cells but they are also produced in several sites such as SGL, taenia tecta, PSB, septum, TE, and the amygdalar hem.
Nowadays, we may affirm that CR cells originate in various focal sources in the developing brain, although we may not rule out the possibility that additional origin sites might exist. This multi-zonal production of CR may guarantee complete coverage of the cerebral cortex. Moreover, the various subtypes of CR cells generated at different sites intermingle in the cortex, in a way that cortical areas present a different proportion of distinct CR subtypes. This might contribute to determining area-specific properties (). At this point, two recent specific discoveries should also be noted: first, the distribution of CR cells in layer I depends on inhibitory cell-cell mechanisms (Villar-Cervino et al., 2013), and second, the distribution of CR cells is largely associated with their interaction with radial glia (). Finally, we would also like to remark that, probably, all the controversy generated around CR cells since they were first described by Cajal is due to the fact that they come from different sites what produces different CR subpopulations with specific morphological and physiological characteristics. Therefore, in order to achieve a thorough understanding of CR cells, researchers need to develop strategies that combine birth-dating and tracing studies with specific markers.
ROLE OF CAJAL–RETZIUS CELLS IN RADIAL NEURONAL MIGRATION
The mammalian neocortex is a highly ordered structure in which different types of neurons are arranged by tangential and radial migration during embryonic development to form the final laminated organization. This elaborate assembly is accomplished in distinct steps. The first step is the formation of the preplate, composed of a superficial plexus of corticopetal nerve fibers and a heterogeneous population of post-migratory cells, including CR cells, interneurons, and future subplate neurons (; ). In the second step, waves of post-mitotic neurons exit the ventricular zone and move in a radial direction toward the pial surface, where upon they split the preplate into the MZ (above), which would contain the CR cells, and the subplate (below), thus establishing another cellular band known as the cortical plate. This new layer of cells contributes to layers II-VI of the cortex in rodents (; ; Rakic, 1972). In 1995, it was described how CR cells are responsible for the correct lamination of the neocortex through the secretion of an extracellular protein called Reelin (; Ogawa et al., 1995). In mice lacking Reelin the preplate does not split properly into the MZ and subplate. Consequently, this structure constitutes a “superplate” in the most superficial region of the cortex. Cortical plate neurons accumulate beneath the superplate; young neurons cannot migrate outward by passing across pre-existing cell layers. This results in an inverted pattern of neuronal positioning in all laminated structures (neocortex, cerebellum and hippocampus) as well as in subcortical structures such as the olfactory bulb, inferior olivary complex, and facial nucleus (; ). The list of molecular partners of the Reelin pathway is continuously increasing and it has been shown that the integrity of the Reelin-signaling cascade is essential for the correct positioning of cortical plate neurons and disruption of any of its components leads to failure of radial migration ().
Recently, the comparison of Reelin patterns between amniote species showing some degree of cortical lamination (mammals and lizards) and those with no obvious pallial cytoarchitectonic condensation at all (turtles and birds) led to a “Reelin hypothesis” for cortical developmental evolution, with the condensation of Reelin-expressing cells being a key feature of the establishment of a sophisticated laminated pattern. In fact, the relevance of developing layer I during cortical evolution was hypotethized some years earlier (). These comparative data point up the importance of the Reelin pathway, and hence of CR cells, in the morphogenesis and cytoarchitecture of pallial structures (). However, we should take into account that Reelin is not uniquely expressed by CR cells but also by interneurons (), and therefore we should not confer the main role in orquestrating the radial neuronal migration to CR cells, even though Reelin-positive interneurons have only been detected at post-natal stages (; ).
Moreover, different strategies addressed to eliminating the presence of CR cells have questioned its importance in cell migration. These methods highlight the relevance of CR cells in radial glia maintenance and function (Soriano and del Rio, 2005). For example, local application of a toxic agent to newborn mouse cortex ablates CR cells and disrupts cell migration to layers II/III, causing radial glia to change to astroglia (Super et al., 2000). And in mutants for p73 and Emx1/Emx2 in which there is an absence of CR cells, the cortical pattern is altered although preplate partition and cortical plate formation are not disturbed (Shinozaki et al., 2002; Meyer et al., 2004). In contrast, the ablation of the cortical hem, the predominant source of CR cells, did not produce the inverted lamination observed in the reeler mutant (Yoshida et al., 2006). In line with this unexpected result, some studies have suggested that, rather than CR cells, it is the integrity of the pial basement membrane and meningeal cells that is crucial for correct cortical histogenesis (; ). Nevertheless, another link has been recently reported between CR cells and radial migration through the immunoglobulin-like adhesion molecule Nectin1. In this study, authors described that these cells express Nectin1 which interacts with Nectin3, present in projection neurons, and that this interaction is critical for radial migration (). Interestingly, these molecules belong to the Reelin signaling pathway which indicates, once again, a role of CR cells and Reelin in this process.
POST-NATAL FATE OF CR CELLS: RODENTS VS. PRIMATES
Some studies have suggested that CR cells undergo a morphological change in order to become resident interneurons of layer I in adult neocortex (Parnavelas and Edmunds, 1983). Others have proposed that the decrease in CR neuron density is caused by dilution from the expansion of the cortex during development, without a clear morphological transformation (). However, the most widely accepted theory is that most of the cells are destined to disappear by adulthood and undergo cell death (). In rodents, signs of CR neuron degeneration begin in the second post-natal week, as evidenced by retraction of thin appendages from their main dendrite, swelling of the endoplasmic reticulum, and darkening of the cytoplasm (; Soriano et al., 1994; ). This CR cell loss has also been reported to occur directly after migration in monkeys and humans (Zecevic and Rakic, 2001; ). In these previous studies it was already reported that in rodents nearly 95% of CR cells present at birth may disappear before P10–P14 (; Soda et al., 2003) and these data have recently been recalculated analyzing identified CR neurons that express the green fluorescent protein under the control of different promoters such as the early B-cell factor 2 (Ebf2) or CxBR4 promoters (; ). Researchers concluded that most CR cells die progressively by apoptosis from P7 onwards and only a small fraction (3–4%) present at birth survive into adulthood (; ; ). However, in contrast to the nearly complete elimination of CR cells in the post-natal neocortex, 25% of CR cells appear to survive in the hippocampus of adult animals (Super et al., 1998; ), reflecting a differential role between neocortical and hippocampal CR cells in the adulthood. Therefore, neocortical CR cells appear at early stages of embryonic life, they increase their density at the first post-natal week and decrease from there until reaching minimum levels.
CR CELLS DURING POST-NATAL LIFE
There is no plausible explanation for the presence of CR cells during embryonic life and their atrophy and eventual disappearance shortly after birth. Historically, as we have indicated above, researchers have focused their efforts in studying the role of CR cells in cortical migration at the prenatal period. However, it would be interesting to think about a putative function of CR cells during early post-natal stages, when CR cells reach their highest density (between P3 and P7) () and the cortical lamination has been already completed. The first post-natal week is a critical period for the maturation of interneurons and pyramidal cells in the neocortex and for the establishment of their final connections. Several studies have described that CR cells show spontaneous activity and that they could belong to an early cortical network that controls the maturation of the cerebral cortex (Marin-Padilla, 1998; ; Radnikow et al., 2002). On the other hand, it was already demonstrated that this cell population was one the earliest functional neurons in the developing human brain when a study in 1968 described the presence of acetylcholinesterase activity in their cytoplasm in 4-month-old human fetuses (). Moreover, they are related to interneurons and neurons via input and output connections, receiving GABAergic, serotonergic, glutamatergic, and noradrenergic inputs and sending glutamatergic information (Figure 3; ; Radnikow et al., 2002; ; ; Myakhar et al., 2011; ). The morphological (long-range horizontal axonal projection) and electrical features of the CR cells and their synaptic input–output relationship at this period would facilitate the stabilization of interneurons and pyramidal dendritic trees suggesting that CR cells can integrate information in layer I and send projections to target neurons to facilitate the formation of the neocortical network during very early stages of development, lending support to Cajal’s associational theory (Molliver et al., 1973; ; ; ; Rickmann and Wolff, 1981). After the early neocortical network is established, most of the CR cells would degenerate and die. Furthermore, no functional role of the small population that remains in the adulthood has been offered.
FIGURE 3
CR CELLS THROUGHOUT EVOLUTION
As indicated above, Cajal and Retzius described, for the first time, CR cells in the MZ of the fetal and early post-natal neocortex in humans, small mammals (rabbit, cat, dog, rat, and mouse), birds, and reptiles. Since then, CR cells have been described in mammalian and non-mammalian vertebrates (Tissir et al., 2003; ; ). Although CR cells are present in all amniotes, the Reelin signal in CR cells increases in mammals and is even higher in primates including humans (Meyer and Goffinet, 1998). In mammals, it has been proposed that the increasing proportion of p73-positive CR cells may contribute to the evolutionary amplification of Reelin-signal in the MZ during development (). Moreover, p73 expression seems to be related to the prolonged survival and increased differentiation of dendritic and axonal processes of CR. Observing CR cells in lizard, mouse and human, it was proposed that p73 may play a role in the acquisition of complexity in CR cells during evolution. In fact, CR cells are rudimentary in lizards, relatively simple in mice, and more complex in primates ().
The abundance of CR cells seems to correlate with the size of the cortical hem, which has been demonstrated to be small in sauropsids such as crocodiles (Tissir et al., 2003), lizards () and chicks () and maximal in humans (; Villar-Cervino and Marin, 2012). The varying size of the cortical hem influencing the number of CR cells could be understood as relevant factors in the evolution of cortical regions across vertebrates. An additional difference between primates and other vertebrates is that in the former at least two types of Reelin-producing cells have been described: large CR cells and at later developmental stages smaller SGL cells (Zecevic and Rakic, 2001). This second cellular type is thought to compensate for the progressive loss of CR cells during the long period of corticogenesis in primates (Zecevic and Rakic, 2001). In another study, it was reported a differential expression of LIM-homeodomain (LIM-hd) factors in primates, birds, and rodents (). They proposed that the expression of a larger repertoire of LIM-hd transcription factors in CR cells may correlate with their diversification and morphological complexity. These factors are assumed to convey higher molecular diversity and the possibility of promoting the emergence of novelties. Indeed CR cells in primates express at least four LIM-hd factors while in rodents the figure is only two. In chicks, none of these factors were found with the exception of Lhx5 in a small zone of the cortical hem (). In summary, we can conclude that the different abundance and complexity of the different CR cells subpopulations, which are characterized by both their specific origin and molecular profile, is involved in the level of complexity of the neocortical structure.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Numerous efforts have been targeted to understand the biology of the CR cells population since it was first described by Cajal in 1890. Paradoxically, when we analyze carefully all the studies reported during more than a century, we realize that the most important features of these cells (morphological and physiological properties) were already indicated by Cajal by employing very rudimentary methodological techniques. This fact points out the importance of his work for the current Neurobiology knowledge. Nowadays, their morphology and electrical properties are better known and we can also specify that they come from several origin sites, although the cortical hem is the most important source. Apart from this, evidence shows that CR cells exert different functions throughout the distinct periods of development, thus regulating the radial neuronal migration during prenatal life and possibly facilitating the cortical network assembly in the post-natal stage. However, to fully understand the exact role of the CR cells in the building of the cerebral cortex, new strategies that may allow the characterization of the different CR cells subsets are needed.
Statements
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Tom Yohannan for editorial advice. This research was supported by the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Commission, grant agreement 222887, FP7-PRIORITY, the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (BFU2012-32617), the Generalitat de Catalunya (SGR2009-366), La Caixa Obra Social Foundation, and the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI11/03028) to José A. del Río. Vanessa Gil and Sara Nocentini were supported by MINECO and IBEC.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
1
AbbottL. C.JacobowitzD. M. (1999). Developmental expression of calretinin-immunoreactivity in the thalamic eminence of the fetal mouse.Int. J. Dev. Neurosci.17331–345. 10.1016/S0736-5748(99)00037-4
2
AbellanA.MenuetA.DehayC.MedinaL.RetauxS. (2010). Differential expression of LIM-homeodomain factors in Cajal-Retzius cells of primates, rodents, and birds.Cereb. Cortex201788–1798. 10.1093/cercor/bhp242bhp242
3
AbrahamH.MeyerG. (2003). Reelin-expressing neurons in the postnatal and adult human hippocampal formation.Hippocampus13715–727. 10.1002/hipo.10125
4
AguiloA.SchwartzT. H.KumarV. S.PeterlinZ. A.TsiolaA.SorianoE.et al (1999). Involvement of cajal-retzius neurons in spontaneous correlated activity of embryonic and postnatal layer 1 from wild-type and reeler mice.J. Neurosci.1910856–10868.
5
AlcantaraS.RuizM.D’ArcangeloG.EzanF.de LeceaL.CurranT.et al (1998). Regional and cellular patterns of reelin mRNA expression in the forebrain of the developing and adult mouse.J. Neurosci.187779–7799.
6
AltmanJ.BayerS. A. (1995). Atlas of Prenatal Rat Brain Development. Ann Arbor: CRC Press Inc.
7
AngevineJ. B.Jr.SidmanR. L. (1961). Autoradiographic study of cell migration during histogenesis of cerebral cortex in the mouse.Nature192766–768. 10.1038/192766b0
8
AnstötzM.CosgroveK. E.HackI.MugnainiE.MaccaferriGLübkeJ. H. (2013). Morphology, input-output relations and synaptic connectivity of Cajal-Retzius cells in layer 1 of the developing neocortex of CXBR4-EGFP mice.Brain Struct. Funct.10.1007/s00429-013-0627-2[Epub ahead of print].
9
AnstömK. E. (1967). On the early development of the isocortex in fetal sheep.Prog. Brain Res.261–59.
10
BeggsH. E.Schahin-ReedD.ZangK.GoebbelsS.NaveK. A.GorskiJ.et al (2003). FAK deficiency in cells contributing to the basal lamina results in cortical abnormalities resembling congenital muscular dystrophies.Neuron40501–514. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00666-4
11
BerryM.RogersA. W. (1965). The migration of neuroblasts in the developing cerebral cortex.J. Anat.99691–709.
12
BielasS.HigginbothamH.KoizumiH.TanakaT.GleesonJ. G. (2004). Cortical neuronal migration mutants suggest separate but intersecting pathways.Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.20593–618. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.082503.103047
13
BielleF.GriveauA.Narboux-NemeN.VigneauS.SigristM.ArberS.et al (2005). Multiple origins of Cajal-Retzius cells at the borders of the developing pallium.Nat. Neurosci.81002–1012. 10.1038/nn1511
14
Boulder Committee. (1970). Embryonic vertebrate central nervous system: revised terminology.Anat. Rec.166257–261. 10.1002/ar.1091660214
15
BradfordR.ParnavelasJ. G.LiebermanA. R. (1977). Neurons in layer I of the developing occipital cortex of the rat.J. Comp. Neurol.176121–132. 10.1002/cne.901760108
16
BystronI.BlakemoreC.RakicP. (2008). Development of the human cerebral cortex: Boulder Committee revisited.Nat. Rev. Neurosci.9110–122. 10.1038/nrn2252
17
Cabrera-SocorroA.Hernandez-AcostaN. C.Gonzalez-GomezM.MeyerG. (2007). Comparative aspects of p73 and Reelin expression in Cajal-Retzius cells and the cortical hem in lizard, mouse and human.Brain Res.113259–70. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.11.015
18
CavinessV. S.Jr. (1982). Neocortical histogenesis in normal and reeler mice: a developmental study based upon [3H]thymidine autoradiography.Brain Res.256293–302. 10.1016/0165-3806(82)90141-9
19
CavinessV. S.Jr.SidmanR. L. (1973). Time of origin or corresponding cell classes in the cerebral cortex of normal and reeler mutant mice: an autoradiographic analysis.J. Comp. Neurol.148141–151. 10.1002/cne.901480202
20
ChowdhuryT. G.JimenezJ. C.BomarJ. M.Cruz-MartinA.CantleJ. P.Portera-CailliauC. (2010). Fate of cajal-retzius neurons in the postnatal mouse neocortex.Front. Neuroanat.4:10. 10.3389/neuro.05.010.2010
21
D’ArcangeloG.MiaoG. G.ChenS. C.SoaresH. D.MorganJ. I.CurranT. (1995). A protein related to extracellular matrix proteins deleted in the mouse mutant reeler.Nature374719–723. 10.1038/374719a0
22
De CarlosJ. A.BorrellJ. (2007). A historical reflection of the contributions of Cajal and Golgi to the foundations of neuroscience.Brain Res. Rev.558–16. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.03.010
23
DeFelipeJ. (2002). Sesquicentenary of the birthday of Santiago Ramon y Cajal, the father of modern neuroscience.Trends Neurosci.25481–484. 10.1016/S0166-2236(02)02214-2
24
DeFelipeJ.JonesE. (1988). Cajal on the Cerebral Cortex. An Annotated Translation of the Complete Writings. New York: Oxford University Press.
25
DeFelipeJ.JonesE. G. (1992). Santiago Ramon y Cajal and methods in neurohistology.Trends Neurosci.15237–246. 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90057-F
26
del RioJ. A.MartinezA.FonsecaM.AuladellC.SorianoE. (1995). Glutamate-like immunoreactivity and fate of Cajal-Retzius cells in the murine cortex as identified with calretinin antibody.Cereb. Cortex513–21. 10.1093/cercor/5.1.13
27
DererP.DererM. (1990). Cajal-Retzius cell ontogenesis and death in mouse brain visualized with horseradish peroxidase and electron microscopy.Neuroscience36839–856. 10.1016/0304-3940(78)90209-4
28
DuckettS.PearseA. G. (1968). The cells of Cajal-Retzius in the developing human brain.J. Anat.102183–187.
29
FairenA.Morante-OriaJ.FrassoniC. (2002). The surface of the developing cerebral cortex: still special cells one century later.Prog. Brain Res.136281–291. 10.1016/S0079-6123(02)36024-2
30
FoxM. W.InmanO. (1966). Persistence of Retzius-Cajal cells in developing dog brain.Brain Res.3192–194. 10.1016/0006-8993(66)90076-X
31
GaoZ.GodboutR. (2013). Reelin-Disabled-1 signaling in neuronal migration: splicing takes the stage.Cell Mol. Life. Sci.702319–2329. 10.1007/s00018-012-1171-6
32
Gil-SanzC.FrancoS. J.Martinez-GarayI.EspinosaA.Harkins-PerryS.MullerU. (2013). Cajal-Retzius cells instruct neuronal migration by coincidence signaling between secreted and contact-dependent guidance cues.Neuron79461–477. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.040
33
GoffinetA. M.BarI.BernierB.TrujilloC.RaynaudAMeyerG. (1999). Reelin expression during embryonic brain development in lacertilian lizards.J. Comp. Neurol.414533–550. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19991129)414:4<533::AID-CNE8>3.0.CO;2-V
34
GolgiC. (1873). Sulla struttura della sostanza grigia del cervelo. Gazzetta Medica Italiana.Lombardia33244–246.
35
GorskiJ. A.TalleyT.QiuM.PuellesL.RubensteinJ. L.JonesK. R. (2002). Cortical excitatory neurons and glia, but not GABAergic neurons, are produced in the Emx1-expressing lineage.J. Neurosci.226309–6314.
36
GuX.LiuB.WuX.YanY.ZhangY.WeiY.et al (2011). Inducible genetic lineage tracing of cortical hem derived Cajal-Retzius cells reveals novel properties.PLoS ONE6:e28653. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028653
37
HalfterW.DongS.YipY. P.WillemM.MayerU. (2002). A critical function of the pial basement membrane in cortical histogenesis.J. Neurosci.226029–6040.
38
HataiS. (1902). Observations on the developing neurones of the cerebral cortex of foetal cats.J. Comp. Neurol.12199–204. 10.1002/cne.910120205
39
JanusonisS.GluncicV.RakicP. (2004). Early serotonergic projections to Cajal-Retzius cells: relevance for cortical development.J. Neurosci.241652–1659. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4651-03.200424/7/1652
40
JonesE. G. (2007). Neuroanatomy: Cajal and after Cajal.Brain Res. Rev.55248–255. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.06.001
41
KöllikerA. (1896). Handbuch der Gewebelehre des Menschen6th EdnVol.2Leipzig: W. Engelmann.
42
KonigN. (1978). Retzius-Cajal or Cajal-Retzius cells?Neurosci. Lett.9361–3630304-3940(78)90209-4
43
KonigN.MartyR. (1981). Early neurogenesis and synaptogenesis in cerebral cortex.Bibl. Anat.152–160.
44
KonigN.RochG.MartyR. (1975). The onset of synaptogenesis in rat temporal cortex.Anat. Embryol. (Berl.)14873–87. 10.1007/BF00315564
45
KonigN.ValatJ.FulcrandJ.MartyR. (1977). The time of origin of Cajal-Retzius cells in the rat temporal cortex. An autoradiographic study.Neurosci. Lett.421–26. 10.1016/0304-3940(77)90118-5
46
KwonH. J.MaS.HuangZ. (2011). Radial glia regulate Cajal-Retzius cell positioning in the early embryonic cerebral cortex.Dev. Biol.35125–34. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.12.026
47
Lopez-MunozF.BoyaJ.AlamoC. (2006). Neuron theory, the cornerstone of neuroscience, on the centenary of the Nobel Prize award to Santiago Ramon y Cajal.Brain Res. Bull.70391–405. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.07.010
48
LuskinM. B.ShatzC. J. (1985). Studies of the earliest generated cells of the cat’s visual cortex: cogeneration of subplate and marginal zones.J. Neurosci.51062–1075.
49
MaJ.YaoX. H.FuY.YuY. C. (2013). Development of layer 1 neurons in the mouse neocortex.Cereb. Cortex10.1093/cercor/bht114[Epub ahead of print].
50
Marin-PadillaM. (1971). Early prenatal ontogenesis of the cerebral cortex (neocortex) of the cat (Felis domestica). A Golgi study. I. The primordial neocortical organization.Z. Anat. Entwicklungsgesch.134117–145. 10.1007/BF00519296
51
Marin-PadillaM. (1978). Dual origin of the mammalian neocortex and evolution of the cortical plate.Anat. Embryol. (Berl.)152109–126. 10.1007/BF00315920
52
Marin-PadillaM. (1988). “Early ontogenesis of the human cerebral cortex,” inCerebral CortexVol. VIIedsPetersA.JonesE. G. (New York: Plenum Press) 1–30.
53
Marin-PadillaM. (1990). Three-dimensional structural organization of layer I of the human cerebral cortex: a Golgi study.J. Comp. Neurol.29989–105. 10.1002/cne.902990107
54
Marin-PadillaM. (1998). Cajal-Retzius cells and the development of the neocortex.Trends Neurosci.2164–71. 10.1016/S0166-2236(97)01164-8
55
Marin-PadillaM.Marin-PadillaT. M. (1982). Origin, prenatal development and structural organization of layer I of the human cerebral (motor) cortex. A Golgi study.Anat. Embryol. (Berl.)164161–206. 10.1007/BF00318504
56
MartinottiC. (1890). Beitrag zum Studium der Hirnrinde und dem Centralursprung der Nerven.Int. Monatsschr. Anat. Physiol.769–90.
57
MeyerG. (2010). Building a human cortex: the evolutionary differentiation of Cajal-Retzius cells and the cortical hem.J. Anat.217334–343. 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01266.xJOA1266
58
MeyerG.Cabrera SocorroA.Perez GarciaC. G.Martinez MillanL.WalkerN.CaputD. (2004). Developmental roles of p73 in Cajal-Retzius cells and cortical patterning.J. Neurosci.249878–9887. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3060-04.2004
59
MeyerG.GoffinetA. M. (1998). Prenatal development of reelin-immunoreactive neurons in the human neocortex.J. Comp. Neurol.39729–40. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19980720)397:1<29::AID-CNE3>3.0.CO;2-K
60
MeyerG.GoffinetA. M.FairenA. (1999). What is a Cajal-Retzius cell? A reassessment of a classical cell type based on recent observations in the developing neocortex.Cereb. Cortex9765–775. 10.1093/cercor/9.8.765
61
MeyerG.Perez-GarciaC. G.AbrahamH.CaputD. (2002). Expression of p73 and Reelin in the developing human cortex.J. Neurosci.224973–4986.
62
MeyerG.SoriaJ. M.Martinez-GalanJ. R.Martin-ClementeB.FairenA. (1998). Different origins and developmental histories of transient neurons in the marginal zone of the fetal and neonatal rat cortex.J. Comp. Neurol.397493–518. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19980810)397:4<493::AID-CNE4>3.0.CO;2-X
63
MeynertT. (1867). Der Bau der Grosshirnrinde und seine ortlichen verschiedenheiten, nebst einem pathologisch-anatomischen Corollarium.Vjschr. Psychiatr. 1, 77–93,126–170198–217.
64
MolliverM. E.KostovicIvan der LoosH. (1973). The development of synapses in cerebral cortex of the human fetus.Brain Res.50403–407. 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90741-5
65
MyakharO.UnichenkoP.KirischukS. (2011). GABAergic projections from the subplate to Cajal-Retzius cells in the neocortex.Neuroreport22525–529. 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834888a4
66
OgawaM.MiyataT.NakajimaK.YagyuK.SeikeM.IkenakaK.et al (1995). The reeler gene-associated antigen on Cajal-Retzius neurons is a crucial molecule for laminar organization of cortical neurons.Neuron14899–912. 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90329-1
67
ParnavelasJ. G.EdmundsS. M. (1983). Further evidence that Retzius-Cajal cells transform to nonpyramidal neurons in the developing rat visual cortex.J. Neurocytol.12863–871. 10.1007/BF01258156
68
RadnikowG.FeldmeyerD.LubkeJ. (2002). Axonal projection, input and output synapses, and synaptic physiology of Cajal-Retzius cells in the developing rat neocortex.J. Neurosci.226908–6919.
69
RakicP. (1972). Mode of cell migration to the superficial layers of fetal monkey neocortex.J. Comp. Neurol.14561–83. 10.1002/cne.901450105
70
Ramón y CajalS. (1890). Sobre la existencia de células nerviosas especiales en la primera capa de las circonvoluciones cerebrales.Gac. Méd. Cat.13737–739.
71
Ramón y CajalS. (1891a). Notas preventivas sobre la retina y gran simpatico de los mamíferos (extracts).Gac. Sanitaria (Barcelona)16571–585.
72
Ramón y CajalS. (1891b). Sur la structure de lécorce cérébrale de quelques mammiferes.Cellule7125–176.
73
Ramón y CajalS. (1893). Los Ganglios y Plexos Nerviosos del Intestino de los Mamíferos y Pequeñas Adiciones a Nuestros Trabajos Sobre la Médula y Gran Simpatico General.Madrid: Nicolás Moya45.
74
Ramón y CajalS. (1897). Las células de cilindro-eje corto de la capa molecular del cerebro.Rev. Trimestral Microgr.2105–127.
75
Ramón y CajalS. (1904). Textura del Sistema Nervioso del Hombre y de Los Vertebrados. Madrid: Nicolás Moya.
76
Ramón y CajalS. (1911). Histologie du Systéme Nerveux de L’homme et Des Vertébrés. Paris: Maloine.
77
Ramón y CajalS. (1923). Recuerdos de mi vida. Madrid: Imprenta de Juan Pueyo.
78
RetziusG. (1893). Die Cajal’schen Zellen der Grosshirnrinde beim Menschen und bei Säugetieren.Biol. Untersuchungen Neue Folge51–8.
79
RickmannM.ChronwallB. M.WolffJ. R. (1977). On the development of non-pyramidal neurons and axons outside the cortical plate: the early marginal zone as a pallial anlage.Anat. Embryol. (Berl.)151285–307. 10.1007/BF00318931
80
RickmannM.WolffJ. R. (1981). Differentiation of ‘preplate’ neurons in the pallium of the rat.Bibl. Anat.142–146.
81
ShinozakiK.MiyagiT.YoshidaM.MiyataT.OgawaM.AizawaS.et al (2002). Absence of Cajal-Retzius cells and subplate neurons associated with defects of tangential cell migration from ganglionic eminence in Emx1/2 double mutant cerebral cortex.Development1293479–3492.
82
ShoukimasG. M.HindsJ. W. (1978). The development of the cerebral cortex in the embryonic mouse: an electron microscopic serial section analysis.J. Comp. Neurol.179795–830. 10.1002/cne.901790407
83
SieversJ.RaedlerA. (1981). Light and electron microscopical studies on the development of the horizontal cells of Cajal-Retzius.>Bibl. Anat.161–166. 10.1007/BF00317896
84
SodaT.NakashimaR.WatanabeD.NakajimaK.PastanI.NakanishiS. (2003). Segregation and coactivation of developing neocortical layer 1 neurons.J. Neurosci.236272–6279.
85
SorianoEdel RioJ. A. (2005). The cells of cajal-retzius: still a mystery one century after.Neuron46389–394. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.019.
86
SorianoE.del RioJ. A.MartinezA.SuperH. (1994). Organization of the embryonic and early postnatal murine hippocampus. I. Immunocytochemical characterization of neuronal populations in the subplate and marginal zone.J. Comp. Neurol.342571–595. 10.1002/cne.903420406
87
SuperH.del RioJ. A.MartinezA.Perez-SustP.SorianoE. (2000). Disruption of neuronal migration and radial glia in the developing cerebral cortex following ablation of Cajal-Retzius cells.Cereb. Cortex10602–613. 10.1093/cercor/10.6.602
88
SuperH.MartinezA.del RioJ. A.SorianoE. (1998). Involvement of distinct pioneer neurons in the formation of layer-specific connections in the hippocampus.J. Neurosci.184616–4626.
89
Takiguchi-HayashiK.SekiguchiM.AshigakiS.TakamatsuM.HasegawaH.Suzuki-MigishimaR.et al (2004). Generation of reelin-positive marginal zone cells from the caudomedial wall of telencephalic vesicles.J. Neurosci.242286–2295. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4671-03.200424/9/2286
90
TissirF.Lambert De RouvroitC.SireJ. Y.MeyerG.GoffinetA. M. (2003). Reelin expression during embryonic brain development in Crocodylus niloticus.J. Comp. Neurol.457250–262. 10.1002/cne.10573
91
TissirF.RavniA.AchouriY.RiethmacherD.MeyerG.GoffinetA. M. (2009). DeltaNp73 regulates neuronal survival in vivo.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10616871–16876. 10.1073/pnas.0903191106
92
VerattiE. (1897). Ueber einige Struktureigenthümlichkeiten der Hirnrinde bei den Säugethieren.Anat. Anzeiger14.
93
Villar-CervinoV.MarinO. (2012). Cajal-Retzius cells.Curr. Biol.22R17910.1016/j.cub.2012.01.016S0960-9822(12)00017-6
94
Villar-CervinoV.Molano-MazonM.CatchpoleT.ValdeolmillosM.HenkemeyerM.MartinezL. M.et al (2013). Contact repulsion controls the dispersion and final distribution of Cajal-Retzius cells.Neuron77457–471. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.023
95
Von EconomoC.KoskinasG. N. (1925). Die Cytoarchitektonik der Hirnrinde des erwachsenen Menschen. Vienna: Verlag von Julius Springer.
96
YoshidaM.AssimacopoulosS.JonesK. R.GroveE. A. (2006). Massive loss of Cajal-Retzius cells does not disrupt neocortical layer order.Development133537–545. 10.1242/dev.02209
97
ZecevicN.RakicP. (2001). Development of layer I neurons in the primate cerebral cortex.J. Neurosci.215607–5619.
Summary
Keywords
neocortical development, pioneer neurons, radial glia, cortical hem, reelin, calretinin
Citation
Gil V, Nocentini S and del Río JA (2014) Historical first descriptions of Cajal–Retzius cells: from pioneer studies to current knowledge. Front. Neuroanat. 8:32. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00032
Received
10 February 2014
Accepted
23 April 2014
Published
27 May 2014
Volume
8 - 2014
Edited by
Fernando De Castro, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos – Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha, Spain
Reviewed by
Carlos Portera-Cailliau, University of California Los Angeles, USA; Anja Kerstin Ellen Horn, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Germany
Copyright
© 2014 Gil, Nocentini and del Río.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: José A. del Río and Vanessa Gil, Molecular and Cellular Neurobiotechnology, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia, Parc Científic de Barcelona, Baldiri Reixac 15-21, Barcelona 08028, Spain e-mail: jadelrio@ibecbarcelona.eu; vgil@ibecbarcelona.eu
This article was submitted to the journal Frontiers in Neuroanatomy.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.