Abstract
The olfactory system has a highly regular organization of interconnected synaptic circuits from the periphery. It is therefore an excellent model for understanding general principles about how the brain processes information. Cajal revealed the basic cell types and their interconnections at the end of the XIX century. Since his original descriptions, the observation and analysis of the olfactory system and its components represents a major topic in neuroscience studies, providing important insights into the neural mechanisms. In this review, we will highlight the importance of Cajal contributions and his legacy to the actual knowledge of the olfactory system.
Introduction
Santiago Ramón y Cajal is called the father of modern neuroscience for our current understanding of the nervous system really began through his work. Cajal postulated the main principle of neuroscience, the Neuron Doctrine, which recognizes the neuron as the basic anatomical and functional unit of the nervous system (Ramón y Cajal, 1891). His view was opposed to the reticular theory developed by Golgi (1873). The principal advantage that Cajal had over his contemporaries was the better understanding of the Golgi method allowing thus its correct interpretation. With this edge Cajal was able to give a successful explanation to the static view of the sections impregnated by the Golgi method. He was even able to make predictions on physiological brain properties that are being demonstrated nowadays thanks to more sophisticated techniques. Based on observations done using the Golgi method Cajal concluded: “It happens sometimes that the reaction of Golgi runs from one fiber to another when two of them intersect, resembling branches or anastomotic examples. This error can only be avoided by using high magnifying lenses and not giving credit to other branches other than those that appear in the focal plane and on the level of those triangular thickenings that are never absent in cases of a legitimate branch” (Ramón y Cajal, 1890b). In birds' cerebellum, Cajal correctly described that the surface of Purkinje cells “appears bristling with thorns or short spines” (Ramón y Cajal, 1888); Golgi instead, rejected the existence of these spines, considering them artifacts of the silver staining technique. He also established the connections between neurons and drew the maps of the trajectory of nerve currents and impulses that led him to formulate the Law of Dynamic Polarization: “The protoplasmic expansions, dendrites, and the cellular body have axipetal conduction (i.e., toward the axon); whereas the axon has dendrifugal and somatofugal conduction (i.e., it comes from the dendrites or the cellular body)” (Ramón y Cajal, 1899). Furthermore, Cajal described the growth cone as a “concentration of protoplasm of conical form, endowed with amoeboid movements” (Ramón y Cajal, 1890a). Another of Cajal's contributions was the formulation of the Neurotropic Theory (Ramón y Cajal, 1892a); which shows how nerve cells find their way to their targets during development. In the formulation of these Laws explaining the morphological and functional organization of the nervous system, the analyses of the olfactory system was critical; this due to its accessibility, its orderly organization in layers and the easy identification of the main direction of the nervous message flow. Thus, the aim of this article is to give a brief outline of Cajal's main contributions to the knowledge of the olfactory system along with some key developments in our current understanding of this system.
Olfactory circuit
“The flow of the nervous movement in the bulb would be the following: the olfactory imprint is collected in the mucosa by the peripheral expansion of the bipolar cells and is then transferred to the glomeruli where both the mitral corpuscles as well as the pyramidal or fusiform cells from the molecular layer collect said imprint to raise it to the brain. […] In summary, there are two main junctions: one in the glomeruli and another one in the cortex of the olfactory lobe. In each one of these junctions the movement acquires more diffusion, partaking in its conduction an increasingly larger number of nervous corpuscles” (Ramón y Cajal, 1892b).
The olfactory system represents an excellent model of the cellular interaction between the periphery and the central nervous system. In the nasal cavity is located the olfactory epithelium (OE) where the olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs), in direct contact with the environment, are contained. OSNs project their axons, through the cribriform plate, to contact target cells in the olfactory bulb (OB). OB projection cells send the olfactory signal to the olfactory cortex (OC), which includes the olfactory tubercle, piriform cortex, amygdala, and entorhinal cortex. The olfactory information is then further transmitted to the thalamus, hypothalamus, or hippocampus (Figure 1A). One of Cajal's most important contributions, the Law of dynamic polarization, was possible by the observation of the direction of the signal flow from one neuron to the next in this system. In particular, he used arrows to represent in his histological drawings the flow of information from the periphery (OE) to the OB in the brain and then onto the OC (Figure 1B): “Excitation is conducted at the glomeruli, where numerous olfactory fibers end. Here, the motion is transmitted along several currents directed along the path of the projection cells (mitral or superior, medial, and inferior tufted cells), from the intraglomerular tufts, to the axis-cylinders and their cerebral endpoints in the olfactory centers” (Ramón y Cajal, 1890b). Thus, even without a functional frame, Cajal proposed the direction of the information flow that was later corroborated by physiological studies (reviewed in Shepherd and Erulkar, 1997), although the presence of axonless granule cells in this system challenged the Law of dynamic polarization (Shepherd et al., 2007; Sassoè-Pognetto, 2011).
Figure 1
Cajal's detailed study of the olfactory system and its components (Figure 2A) (Ramón y Cajal, 1890b) laid the foundations for later contemporary studies (Figures 2B,C). In his book “Recuerdos de mi vida” (Ramón y Cajal, 1917), he defines the OB as an accessible and regular structure, comparable to the cerebellum and retina. In this system, once again, he evidenced the nerve propagation by contact and the important role of dendrites: “The history of the physiological interpretation of the structure of the olfactory bulb provides a typical case of the crippling influence of theoretical prejudices. Golgi had already discovered before us the most important facts of that structure, the singularly invaluable concurrency within the glomeruli of the olfactory fibers, on the one hand, and the dendritic tuft of mitral cells on the other; but his rigid conception of the diffuse nervous network did not allow him to recognize the great physiological scope of such provision” (Ramón y Cajal, 1917).
Figure 2
These characteristics are reinforced by the incorporation of new cellular elements not only during development, but also during adulthood (Altman, ; Lois and Alvarez-Buylla, 1994). The plastic process in the OB is the result of the combination of cellular contributions from either the telencephalic subventricular zone as a part of the central nervous system, and the olfactory placode/epithelium, which “represents a peripheral nervous center” (Ramón y Cajal, 1892b).
Olfactory epithelium
“The olfactory mucosa contains the nervous cells from where the olfactory fibers that reach the brain through the ethmoid's lamina cribrose; it thus represents a peripheral nervous center. […] The bipolar or olfactory cell represents the real reception organ of the odorant impulse or stimulus” (Ramón y Cajal, 1892b).
The olfactory epithelium is the place where volatile odorant molecules are initially detected and it is composed by three cell types: OSNs, supporting cells and basal cells. OSNs (Figure 3) are bipolar cells located in the intermediate OE region, distributed between the supporting cells. Their apical processes end at the lumen in non-motile cilia, while the thinner descending axon “gives neuronal character to the bipolar cell” (Ramón y Cajal, 1892b) and transmits the impulse to the OB. The supporting or sustentacular cells exhibit an irregular morphology, but their nuclei are mostly located apically, thereby being narrower on their basal side (Figures 3A,B). The characteristic morphology of these cells offers “numerous facets or hollow molds in order to adapt to the bipolar corpuscles […] and their mission appears to be no other than preventing any contact between them, avoiding any horizontal current communication” (Ramón y Cajal, 1892b). Basal cells, not described by Cajal, form a single cell layer in the basal lamina, near the underlying bone of the OE (Retzius, 1892). They have a constant turnover (Graziadei, 1973) being the precursors of OSNs (Suzuki et al., 2013).
Figure 3
One of the main advances in the study of this system was the cloning of the olfactory signal transduction molecules, in particular the odorant receptors (Buck and Axel, ) located on the OSNs cilia. In mice there are over five million OSNs, each expressing just one among the thousand odorant receptor genes (Zhang and Firestein, 2002). These chemosensory receptors are odorant-binding proteins with seven transmembrane domains coupled to G-proteins. Each receptor is codified by the allele of a single gene (Buck and Axel, ) and binds only odor molecules of a certain family. They are responsible of transforming the chemical information into electric signals in the olfactory circuit. Genetic tools reported that OSNs, expressing a given odorant receptor, are intermingled and randomly distributed within four large OE zones. These zones are symmetric in both sides of the nasal cavities and are divided based on the expression pattern of some odorant receptors (Ressler et al., 1993; Vassar et al., 1993). Furthermore, OSNs expressing the same receptor converge upon a stereotypical pair of glomeruli (Mombaerts et al., 1996). Nonetheless, the mechanisms by which a set of OSNs, expressing certain odorant receptor, innervates a discrete amount of glomeruli are not well-known; although it seems to be dependent on environmental cues, as well as on intrinsic OSN/odorant receptor factors (reviewed in Mombaerts, 2006; Blanchart and López-Mascaraque, ).
Cajal showed that OSNs axons ended into the glomeruli (Figure 4A): “This fibril goes through a part of the dermis indivisible and without anastomosing, then gathering with others in tight bundles, goes upwards later, always preserving its individuality, through the ethmoid's lamina cribrosa and assaults, finally, the olfactory bulb, ending arborizing in the thickness of one glomeruli of this central nervous system organ” (Ramón y Cajal, 1892b). Even when the past decades have seen enormous achievements by the implementation of new technologies, Cajal's morphological descriptions provided the basis for subsequent studies. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry revealed the molecular features of OSNs (Figures 3C–E). Later, the use of HRP, retrograde fluorescent markers (Fast Blue, Diamidino Yellow), biotinylated dextrans and lipophilic fluorescent tracers (e.g., DiI, DiO, DiA) confirmed the pathway of OSN axons from the periphery to the OB. At this respect, Figure 4D shows the path of retrogradely OSN labeled cells after a DiI injection into the OB. Furthermore, techniques such as in utero electroporation of an EGP-expressing plasmid used to study the olfactory pit cell migrations allowed also a further visualization of these nerve bundles (Figure 4C). These axons do not ramify until they reach the glomeruli (Figure 4B), where they will make contacts with the dendrites of the projection neurons. It is within these specialized structures where the information from the periphery is integrated and then conducted to the rest of the brain. Additionally, the development of the OB is not dependent on the presence of the OE or the synaptic input from the OSNs (López-Mascaraque et al., 1996; López-Mascaraque and De Castro, 2002), although OSN axons are critical during OB layering in the final orientation of mitral cells (López-Mascaraque et al., 2005).
Figure 4
Spatial cell arrangements in the olfactory bulb
Next station in the olfactory pathway is the olfactory bulb: “the olfactory nerves, which bore into the cranium base through several holes in considerable numbers, and assault the olfactory bulb where they end” (Ramón y Cajal, 1890b). One of the most important of Cajal findings was the demonstration of the entire course of the olfactory fibers. Cajal made the real assumption that these fibers come from the mucosa (OE) and end into the glomerulus at the OB not as a network, as Golgi thought, but by free varicose arborizations.
The OB has a well-defined laminar structure and is formed by different cell populations divided into projection neurons (mitral cells and some tufted cells), interneurons (periglomerular cells, external tufted cells, short axon cells, granule cells, Van Gehuchten cells, and Blanes cells) and glial cells (astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, olfactory ensheathing cells, NG2, and microglia). The innermost part of the OB, the ependymal zone, contains progenitor cells.
Golgi considered the OB formed by three layers (Golgi, 1875) while Schwalbe (1881) proposed six layers. The definitive description of cell types and disposition in six layers was given by Cajal and his disciples (Ramón y Cajal, 1890b; Blanes, ). From the outside in, the OB is organized in the following layers: the olfactory nerve layer (ONL), glomerular layer (GL), the external plexiform layer (EPL), the mitral cell layer (MCL), the internal plexiform layer (IPL) and the granule cell layer (GcL) (Figures 5A,B). Cajal stated that the ONL was formed by unbranched “nerve fibrils” which preserve the same thickness along their trajectory from the OE. Besides, this layer contains an extremely interesting population restricted exclusively to the olfactory system regions, the olfactory ensheathing cells (Valverde and López-Mascaraque, 1991). During development, olfactory ensheathing cells coexist with astrocytes as part of the migratory mass (Doucette, ; De Carlos et al., ; Blanchart and López-Mascaraque, ; Blanchart et al., ). Olfactory ensheathing cells maintain certain progenitor characteristics (Schwarting et al., 2007) and are responsible, among other things, for the permissibility within the OB to OSNs axons growth during development and adulthood, thus being a key component of the ability of the OE to continually regenerate.
Figure 5
Next stratum, the GL, is defined by Cajal as the target of the fibrils coming from the OSNs: “Under the peripheral fibrillar layer lays an irregular area of two or more rows of disordered ovoid masses called olfactory glomeruli. […] They are composed of the terminal branches of olfactory fibers, the thick plume of dendrites arriving from deeper zones, certain tiny nerve corpuscles and, finally, some neuroglial elements” (Ramón y Cajal, 1890b). More than a century ago Cajal stated the exact input of the OSNs into the glomeruli, although Golgi reported the intraglomerular branching of the olfactory fibers (Golgi, 1875). In 1890 Cajal described the composition of each glomerulus (Figure 6A): the terminal arborization of the olfactory fibers, the thick apical dendrites from deeper regions, considerable tiny nervous corpuscles and several neuroglial elements (Ramón y Cajal, 1890b). Those tiny nervous corpuscles correspond to tufted or fusiform nerve cells, that collaborate in the formation of what he called intraglomerular plexus (Figures 6B,C), and external grains or short axon nerve cells, which branch within glomeruli, cells classified by Golgi as glial cells. Nowadays, a further characterization can be achieved either by the specific expression of different markers for each cell type presents or by the cell's physiological properties. Moreover, while Cajal studied the development of this system both in younger and/or phylogenetically less complex animals, nowadays we describe the cellular contributions, e.g., to the OB, after in utero viral infections (Blanchart et al., ) or by electroporation of different plasmids. In fact, a clonal analysis of glial cell populations can be performed with the Star Track approach (García-Marqués and López-Mascaraque, ). Moreover, a modification of this technique that uses an ubiquitous promoter (UbC-Star Track, (Figueres-Oñate and López-Mascaraque, ) allows a more comprehensive lineage study of all the cell populations (Figure 6D).
Figure 6
Since the apical dendrite of mitral cells and 2–3 dendrites of tufted cells penetrate into the territory of each glomerulus, Cajal noted that “the propagation of the nerve impulse is not individual, from a single neuron to another, but collective, from a group of nerve fibers to a group of ganglion corpuscles” (Ramón y Cajal, 1901). Nowadays, the characterization of the functional glomerular map has led to a more thorough understanding of how the positional domain information translates to different odor responses such as innate or learned responses (reviewed in Mori and Sakano, 2011).
Below the glomeruli is located the EPL, similar to the molecular area of the cerebellum or the retina. This layer includes lateral dendrites of the mitral and tufted cells and apical dendritic processes of granular cells (Figure 7A). Cajal named tufted cells as that because of their robust peripheral dendrite branching into the olfactory glomeruli. They are divided into external, middle and deep, dependent on the location of their soma. Cajal also described the presence of axonal collaterals from mitral cells in this molecular layer.
Figure 7
The next stratum is the MCL, composed by mitral cells. Mitral cell bodies, as described by Cajal, form a regular single row and owe their name to their appearance (Figure 7A). They are the principal output cells of the OB and, in most mammals, are characterized by a single apical dendrite through the EPL that branches into an apical tuft within the glomerulus (Figure 7B). Mitral cells are one type of the projection neurons (Figure 7C), whose entire development terminates at postnatal stages (Blanchart et al., ). Within the glomeruli, mitral cells interact and receive inputs through synaptic contacts with periglomerular and granule cells. Mitral cells are the bridge connecting directly the periphery with higher integrative structures (Ramón y Cajal, 1904; reviewed in Gire et al., 2013). Their inputs come from OSNs and external tufted cells and send their outputs to various cortical structures (Hayar et al., 2004; Gire et al., 2012). Cajal also described the centrifugal feedback that mitral cells receive from cortical structures (Ramón y Cajal, 1901), and recent studies provided a functional explanation to these projections (for review see Gire et al., 2013).
Below the MCL layer, the IPL is populated by most axon collaterals of tufted cells (Figure 8A), while the GcL contains many interneurons like the granule cells and the short-axon cells. The granule cells are small spiny ovoid cells with an apical process extending radially into the EPL and short secondary dendrites confined to the GcL (Figures 8B–E). Golgi reported that these cells showed no evidence of axons Golgi (1875) and Blanes () stated that they were not glia as Kölliker claimed (Kölliker, 1891). Additionally, Cajal described different types of short-axon cells within the GcL: Golgi cells, Cajal cells, and Blanes cells. Blanes cells are interneurons with a significant electrophysiological role, as they provide inhibitory inputs onto granule cells and appear to be excited by mitral cells, which could be a novel mechanism for encoding short-term olfactory information (Pressler and Strowbridge, 2006). The different subpopulations of these interneurons were classified by Cajal on morphological and spatial basis. Since his work, the diversity of GcL cells has also been based on molecular and physiological features (Price and Powell, 1970; Schneider and Macrides, 1978; López-Mascaraque et al., 1986; Crespo et al., ; Kosaka and Kosaka, 2005).
Figure 8
In summary, Cajal plotted the dynamic scheme of the OB, pointing out the need to give a special significance to the protoplasmic processes of mitral and tufted cells, which penetrate into the glomerulus and are in intimate contact with the olfactory fibrils. The olfactory fibers never depart from the glomerular territory and neither axons of central origin enter in the glomeruli, which is against Golgi's assertion. Cajal was also a pioneer in the description of different axonal projections of tufted and mitral cells to the OC (Ramón y Cajal, 1904). Indeed anatomical and physiological differences suggests that mitral and tufted cells may serve different functions and possibly contribute to different aspects of the olfactory code including perception of odorants (Nagayama et al., 2004; Shepherd et al., 2004). Although mitral and tufted cells innervate different cortical targets, the circuitry and projection sites of the tufted cells are not yet well-understood and are still one of the main focus of research in the field (for review see Mori and Sakano, 2011). Besides, the two main inhibitory interneuron types described by Cajal in the OB have a significant role in the olfactory processing: periglomerular cells mediate lateral inhibition at the level of the glomeruli (Aungst et al., ), while granule cells mediate dendrodendritic inhibition onto the lateral collaterals of mitral cells (Schoppa et al., 1998). These synapses formed between lateral dendrites of mitral cells and granule cells was suggested to be inconsistent with Cajal's Law of Dynamic Polarization (for extensive reviews see Shepherd et al., 2007; Sassoè-Pognetto, 2011).
Neuroglia in the olfactory bulb
Cajal and his colleagues played an important role in describing glial cells. They initiated an active discussion regarding where to encompass those, at that time, unknown cells into the functional map of the brain. In different species, Cajal identified these cells, closely related to the cell bodies of neurons, as neuroglia. Then, he could not draw any definitive conclusion about the physiological role of neuroglial cells, but he presupposed an insulating role: protection to prevent contact between nerve fibers (Ramón y Cajal, 1896). This insulating theory of the neuroglia was originally developed by Cajal's brother, Pedro, and it was always supported by Cajal: “By rational conjecture, we have defended in several manuscripts the thesis, initially suggested by my brother, that both the epithelial and neuroglial cells have a role insulating the fibers and nervous cells, preventing contacts between close but dynamically independent elements” (Ramón y Cajal, 1897).
Focusing on the OB, Golgi briefly described the glia in this structure, but one the most important descriptions was done by Cajal's disciple, De Castro (). De Castro made a careful comparison between the neuroglia of human OB to other higher mammals by using the Cajal-improved sublimated-gold technique and the reduced silver impregnation method (Figures 9A,D). With these staining methods, Fernando de Castro showed the neuroglial distribution in the OB as well as the abundance and importance of the vascular glial end-feet in different brain areas. He also suggested that neuroglial cells may release neuroactive substances and directly participate in neural transmission (De Castro, ). In addition, he noticed how astrocytes were closely related to blood vessels through their end-feet, raising questions about their specific function: “What role does the neuroglia play in the vascular foot? Would it be entrusted with any function or would it be just a mere support organ? Difficult in every respect is the solution to the problem” (De Castro, ). Recently, the processes of protoplasmic astrocytes arranged around blood vessels (Figures 9B,C) were labeled after in utero electroporation of the Star Track plasmid mix (García-Marqués and López-Mascaraque, ) into the lateral ventricles. After embryonic electroporation of the OB progenitors with UbC-Star Track method (Figueres-Oñate and López-Mascaraque, ), clones of glial cells surrounding several glomeruli are located in adult olfactory bulbs (Figure 9E).
Figure 9
While the glomerular structure and neuronal connectivity has been extensively described, both the role and connectivity of neuroglia in the OB have yet to be characterized. Within the OB, astrocytes do not just play an insulating or supporting role, but they are also an active part of the sensory integration in the olfactory glomeruli, interacting with their neuronal counterparts, in a glomerulus-specific manner (Roux et al., 2011). Although the olfactory astroglia was defined as a syncytium, the advent of molecular and genetic techniques changed the experimental approaches to determine the progeny of single cells, shedding light to a further network specialization (Houades et al., 2008). A promising approach is the in vivo clonal analysis, Star Track, based on the combinatorial expression of different gene reporters (García-Marqués and López-Mascaraque, ; García-Marqués et al., ) that makes possible to trace the progeny of targeted GFAP progenitors (Figures 9D,E). Besides the classification based on morphology and location of glial cells, we show the presence homogeneous glial clones which indicates the existence of separate progenitors for each glial population (García-Marqués and López-Mascaraque, ).
Regardless from the glial elements mentioned above, Cajal also described the presence of myelin fibers within the OB using the Weigert-Pal staining technique (Figure 10A). “The medullated fibers are relatively abundant around the glomeruli and even within them. The periglomerular fibers are generally very thin and correspond with cylinder-axis of the inferior tufted cells […]. The intraglomerular fibers have a more difficult interpretation. […] In general, it can be assumed that said fibers […] end within the same glomerular area. […] As is well known, the olfactory fibers and the grains expansions lack myelin” (Ramón y Cajal, 1890b). Cajal and his disciples also observed what they called “third element” or “adendritic cells” (De Castro, ), known today as microglia. The use of molecular markers, selectively expressed by these cells in the OB, revealed the distinct glia subtypes (Figure 10B).
Figure 10
Olfactory cortex
The olfactory cortex is a phylogenetically old cortical structure. It is formed by all brain regions receiving direct axonal input from mitral and some tufted cells (Allison, ; Price, 1973), making the olfactory system the only sensory modality without thalamic relays. Among several areas, the OC includes the anterior olfactory nucleus, the entorhinal cortex, the piriform cortex (primary OC), tenia tecta, cortical amygdaloid nucleus and the olfactory tubercle. Axons from the OB projecting to the OC constitute the lateral olfactory tract (LOT), located on the outer and lower side of the olfactory pedicle named by Calleja and Cajal as the “external root” (Calleja, ; Ramón y Cajal, 1901).
Despite its heterogeneity throughout the rostro-caudal axis, the OC displays a three-layer organization: layer 1 is subdivided in layers 1a and 1b; layer 2 contains semilunar cells and a large number of pyramidal-like cells and layer 3 is formed by different pyramidal cells (Valverde, 1965). Cajal and his disciple Calleja () distinguished five layers in the OC: fibrillar layer or outer root layer, molecular or plexiform layer, layer of small and large pyramids, layer of polymorphs corpuscles and white matter (Figure 11A).
Figure 11
The fibrillar layer (layer 1a) is formed by LOT fibers while the molecular or plexiform layer (layer 1b) receives associational fibers from deeper cells and includes collaterals of the olfactory fibers, tufts of pyramidal cells and dendrites of deeper horizontal cells. The layer of small and large pyramids (layer 2) appears like a “flexible and undulating belt quite well demarcated from the bordering areas” (Ramón y Cajal, 1901). It contains cells with different morphologies, including semilunar cells (superficial part) and a large number of pyramidal-like cells (in deeper regions). While the semilunar cells usually lack descendent axonal projections, deeper cells display axonal processes penetrating into the white matter. As Cajal postulated, “the configuration of the neurons from said layer is highly variable, being able to discover, even in the deepest planes, multiple elements whose shape is triangular, stellated or fusiform, though they never lack a radial dendrite directed to the second layer” (Ramón y Cajal, 1901). At the deepest level, the polymorph cells layer (layer 3) includes the most voluminous cells with descending axonal collaterals that penetrate into the white matter. Recently, the development of novel tools for the clonal analysis of the brain neural lineages, the UbC-Star Track method (Figueres-Oñate and López-Mascaraque, ), evidenced the large variety of morphologies within the OC (Figures 11B–F). Finally, the white matter is formed by the concurrence of axonal projections from overlying layers, forming a labyrinthic and irregular plexus, that complicates the definition of their routes: “In summary, the fibers or second order conductors coming from the bulbar and frontal cortex, underlying the external root, follow two routes: ones, the majority, go backwards deeply to reach the corpus striatum incorporating to the corona radiata; others travel toward the inside and backwards and enter the anterior commissure. Being unable to sufficiently follow those conductors, we ignore if any of them reach Ammon's horn” (Ramón y Cajal, 1901).
This anatomical organization may underlie the fact that mitral and tufted cells project to the OC through different pathways and toward different targets suggesting the possibility that they carry different odor information (reviewed in Mori and Sakano, 2011). The diverse cortical projections of a single mitral cell, the broad distribution of mitral cells axons and the overlapping of their information at their target neurons provide the basis for a diversification and combinatorial integration of the olfactory information processing (Ghosh et al., ). Recent work using anatomical and physiological techniques demonstrated that individual neurons in the piriform cortex receive convergent input from mitral/tufted cells connected to multiple glomeruli located all over the OB (Apicella et al., ; Davison and Ehlers, ; Miyamichi et al., 2011). The precise scheme of the olfactory pathway displayed by Cajal (Figure 1A) opened the door to the anatomical basis of olfactory processing (Gire et al., 2013). OSNs expressing the same odorant receptor converge in one glomeruli of each hemisphere (Mombaerts et al., 1996; Mombaerts, 2006). This spatial pattern, termed odotopic map is just applied for the first olfactory station (OSN to OB). However, although much is known about how odors are represented at the level of OB, the nature of odor representations in this cortex and the integration of the odor activity of output OB neurons into higher brain regions, essential for the cortical odor representations, are still debated (for review see Bekkers and Suzuki, ).
Olfactory system perspectives
“The functional specialization of the brain imposes to the neurons two main gaps: inability to proliferate and irreversibility of the intra-protoplasmatic differentiation. It is because this reason that, once development is over, the growth and regeneration of axons and dendrites are irrevocably dried up. In the adult brains the nervous pathways are fixed, finished, immutable. Everything may die nothing is regenerated itself. It belongs to the science of the future to change, if possible, this cruel decree” (Ramón y Cajal, 1913).
Unlike other brain structures, the OB is not a simple relay nucleus, but a center for information processing and storage. Cajal missed one of the most important characteristics of the OB, the cell turnover: “Nature has given us a limited amount of brain cells. Here is a capital, large or small, that nobody can increase as the neuron is unable to multiply” (Ramón y Cajal, 1931). However, adult neurogenesis is among the most important brain discoveries opening new debate about the function and integration of these cells into the system. The adult mice brain retains a proliferative area, the subventricular zone (SVZ), which maintains proliferative functions through live. Astrocyte-like cells (B cells) divide to produce neuroblasts via intermediate progenitors. These neuroblasts migrate along the rostral migratory stream to the OB, where they differentiate and migrate to their final positions in the granular or periglomerular layers (Kriegstein and Alvarez-Buylla, 2009). Strikingly, a spatial patterning within the SVZ indicates that interneuron subtypes depend on their generation area (Merkle et al., 2007). Moreover, the temporal differences in the production of interneurons are related to their subtype specification and functional integration in the system (Batista-Brito et al., ).
To conclude, Cajal opened up an essential work to our current understanding of this system. These classical studies provided the basis for anatomical, physiological, and molecular studies. Now, more than a century later, the use of state-of-the-art approaches such as cell type specific optogenetic manipulations, in utero electroporation, in vivo genetic fate mapping and cell ablation, electrophysiological and live-cell imaging techniques, patch-clamp recordings and two-photon microscopy in vivo and in brain slice preparations can help understanding how odor information is represented and processed by the olfactory system.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Statements
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Drs. Albert Blanchart and Eduardo Martin-Lopez for their contribution with the images. We especially thank Dr. Agenor Limon for his careful review and editing of the manuscript. Cajal drawings and micrographs were provided by the Legado Cajal (Instituto Cajal, CSIC, Madrid, Spain) thanks to Dr. Juan A. de Carlos. Fernando de Castro drawings belong to the Fernando de Castro Archives and were provided by his grandson Fernando de Castro. This work was supported by research Grant BFU2010-15564 from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AllisonA. C. (1954). The secondary olfactory areas in the human brain. J. Anat. 88, 481–488.
2
AltmanJ. (1969). Autoradiographic and histological studies of postnatal neurogenesis. IV. Cell proliferation and migration in the anterior forebrain, with special reference to persisting neurogenesis in the olfactory bulb. J. Comp. Neurol. 137, 433–457. 10.1002/cne.901370404
3
ApicellaA.YuanQ.ScanzianiM.IsaacsonJ. S. (2010). Pyramidal cells in piriform cortex receive convergent input from distinct olfactory bulb glomeruli. J. Neurosci. 30, 14255–14260. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2747-10.2010
4
AungstJ. L.HeywardP. M.PucheA. C.KarnupS. VHayarA.SzaboG.et al. (2003). Centre-surround inhibition among olfactory bulb glomeruli. Nature426, 623–629. 10.1038/nature02185
5
Batista-BritoR.CloseJ.MacholdR.FishellG. (2008). The distinct temporal origins of olfactory bulb interneuron subtypes. J. Neurosci. 28, 3966–3975. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5625-07.2008
6
BekkersJ. M.SuzukiN. (2013). Neurons and circuits for odor processing in the piriform cortex. Trends Neurosci. 36, 429–438. 10.1016/j.tins.2013.04.005
7
BlanchartA.CarlosJ. A. D. E.LoL. (2006). Time frame of mitral cell development. J. Comp. Neurol. 543, 529–543. 10.1002/cne
8
BlanchartA.López-MascaraqueL. (2011). From the periphery to the brain: wiring the olfactory system. Transl. Neurosci. 2, 293–309. 10.2478/s13380-011-0038-x
9
BlanchartA.Martín-LópezE.De CarlosJ. A.López-MascaraqueL. (2011). Peripheral contributions to olfactory bulb cell populations (migrations towards the olfactory bulb). Glia59, 278–292. 10.1002/glia.21100
10
BlanesT. (1898). Sobre algunos puntos dudosos de la estructura del bulbo olfatorio. Rev. Trimest. Microgr. 3, 99–127.
11
BuckL. B.AxelR. (1991). A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell65, 175–187. 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90418-X
12
CallejaC. (1893). La Región Olfatoria del Cerebro. Madrid: Moya.
13
CrespoC.Blasco-IbáñezJ. M.Marqués-MaríA. I.Martínez-GuijarroF. J. (2001). Parvalbumin-containing interneurons do not innervate granule cells in the olfactory bulb. Neuroreport12, 2553–2556. 10.1097/00001756-200108080-00052
14
DavisonI. G.EhlersM. D. (2011). Neural circuit mechanisms for pattern detection and feature combination in olfactory cortex. Neuron70, 82–94. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.047
15
De CarlosJ. A.López-MascaraqueL.ValverdeF. (1996). Early olfactory fiber projections and cell migration into the rat telencephalon. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 14, 853–866. 10.1016/S0736-5748(96)00055-X
16
De CastroF. (1920). Estudios sobre la neuroglia de la corteza cerebral del hombre y de los animales. Trab. Lab. Invest. Biol. 18, 1–35.
17
De CastroF. (1951). Anatomical aspects of the ganglionic synaptic transmission in mammalians. Arch. Int. Physiol. 59, 479–525.
18
DoucetteR. (1990). Glial influences on axonal growth in the primary olfactory system. Glia3, 433–449. 10.1002/glia.440030602
19
Figueres-OñateM.López-MascaraqueL. (2013). Clonal cell analysis in the olfactory bulb, in Poster Session Presented at: 43th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience. Available online at: http://www.abstractsonline.com/Plan/ViewAbstract.aspx?sKey=ca564d3b-67c2-414d-8b86-f5cd0137c118&cKey=fe484196-5b7d-46b3-b110-d8f00ffaabfe&mKey={8D2A5BEC-4825-4CD6-9439-B42BB151D1CF}
20
García-MarquésJ.López-MascaraqueL. (2013). Clonal identity determines astrocyte cortical heterogeneity. Cereb. Cortex23, 1463–1472. 10.1093/cercor/bhs134
21
García-MarquésJ.Nunez-LlavesR.Lopez-MascaraqueL. (2014). NG2-glia from pallial progenitors produce the largest clonal clusters of the brain: time frame of clonal generation in cortex and olfactory bulb. J. Neurosci. 34, 2305–2313. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3060-13.2014
22
GhoshS.LarsonS. D.HefziH.MarnoyZ.CutforthT.DokkaK.et al. (2011). Sensory maps in the olfactory cortex defined by long-range viral tracing of single neurons. Nature472, 217–220. 10.1038/nature09945
23
GireD. H.FranksK. M.ZakJ. D.TanakaK. F.WhitesellJ. D.MulliganA. A.et al. (2012). Mitral cells in the olfactory bulb are mainly excited through a multistep signaling path. J. Neurosci. 32, 2964–2975. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5580-11.2012
24
GireD. H.RestrepoD.SejnowskiT. J.GreerC.De CarlosJ. A.López-MascaraqueL. (2013). Temporal processing in the olfactory system: can we see a smell?Neuron78, 416–432. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.04.033
25
GolgiC. (1873). Sulla struttura della sostanza grigia del cervelo. Gazz. Med. Ital. Lomb. 33, 244–246.
26
GolgiC. (1875). Sulla fina struttura dei bulbi olfactorii. Riv. Sper. Freniatr. Med. Leg. 1, 66–78.
27
GraziadeiP. P. C. (1973). Cell dynamics in the olfactory mucosa. Tissue Cell5, 113–131. 10.1016/S0040-8166(73)80010-2
28
HayarA.KarnupS.EnnisM.ShipleyM. T. (2004). External tufted cells: a major excitatory element that coordinates glomerular activity. J. Neurosci. 24, 6676–6685. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1367-04.2004
29
HouadesV.KoulakoffA.EzanP.SeifI.GiaumeC. (2008). Gap junction-mediated astrocytic networks in the mouse barrel cortex. J. Neurosci. 28, 5207–5217. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5100-07.2008
30
KöllikerA. (1891). Ueber den feineren Bau des Bulbus olfactorius. Aus den Sitzungsber der Würzb. Phys. Med. 1, 1–5.
31
KosakaK.KosakaT. (2005). Synaptic organization of the glomerulus in the main olfactory bulb: compartments of the glomerulus and heterogeneity of the periglomerular cells. Anat. Sci. Int. 80, 80–90. 10.1111/j.1447-073x.2005.00092.x
32
KriegsteinA.Alvarez-BuyllaA. (2009). The glial nature of embryonic and adult neural stem cells. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 32, 149–184. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135600
33
LoisC.Alvarez-BuyllaA. (1994). Long-distance neuronal migration in the adult mammalian brain. Science264, 1145–1148. 10.1126/science.8178174
34
López-MascaraqueL.De CarlosJ. A.ValverdeF. (1986). Structure of the olfactory bulb of the hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus): description of cell types in the granular layer. J. Comp. Neurol. 253, 135–152. 10.1002/cne.902530202
35
López-MascaraqueL.De CarlosJ. A.ValverdeF. (1996). Early onset of the rat olfactory bulb projections. Neuroscience70, 255–266. 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00360-U
36
López-MascaraqueL.De CastroF. (2002). The olfactory bulb as an independent developmental domain. Cell Death Differ. 9, 1279–1286. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401076
37
López-MascaraqueL.GarcíaC.BlanchartA.De CarlosJ. A. (2005). Olfactory epithelium influences the orientation of mitral cell dendrites during development. Dev. Dyn. 232, 325–335. 10.1002/dvdy.20239
38
Martín-LópezE.BlanchartA.De CarlosJ. A.López-MascaraqueL. (2011). Dab1 (Disable homolog-1) reelin adaptor protein is overexpressed in the olfactory bulb at early postnatal stages. PLoS ONE6:e26673. 10.1371/journal.pone.0026673
39
Martín-LópezE.García-MarquesJ.Núñez-LlavesR.López-MascaraqueL. (2013). Clonal astrocytic response to cortical injury. PLoS ONE8:e74039. 10.1371/journal.pone.0074039
40
MerkleF. T.MirzadehZ.Alvarez-BuyllaA. (2007). Mosaic organization of neural stem cells in the adult brain. Science317, 381–384. 10.1126/science.1144914
41
MiyamichiK.AmatF.MoussaviF.WangC.WickershamI.WallN. R.et al. (2011). Cortical representations of olfactory input by trans-synaptic tracing. Nature472, 191–196. 10.1038/nature09714
42
MombaertsP. (2006). Axonal wiring in the mouse olfactory system. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 713–737. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.012804.093915
43
MombaertsP.WangF.DulacC.ChaoS. K.NemesA.MendelsohnM.et al. (1996). Visualizing an olfactory sensory map. Cell87, 675–686. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81387-2
44
MoriK.SakanoH. (2011). How is the olfactory map formed and interpreted in the mammalian brain?Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 34, 467–499. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-112210-112917
45
NagayamaS.TakahashiY. K.YoshiharaY.MoriK. (2004). Mitral and tufted cells differ in the decoding manner of odor maps in the rat olfactory bulb. J. Neurophysiol. 91, 2532–2540. 10.1152/jn.01266.2003
46
PresslerR. T.StrowbridgeB. W. (2006). Blanes cells mediate persistent feedforward inhibition onto granule cells in the olfactory bulb. Neuron49, 889–904. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.02.019
47
PriceJ. L. (1973). An autoradiographic study of complementary laminar patterns of termination of afferent fibers to the olfactory cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 150, 87–108. 10.1002/cne.901500105
48
PriceJ. L.PowellT. P. (1970). The synaptology of the granule cells of the olfactory bulb. J. Cell Sci. 7, 125–155.
49
Ramón y CajalS. (1888). Estructura de los centros nerviosos de las aves. Rev. Trim. Histol. Norm. Pat. 1, 1–10.
50
Ramón y CajalS. (1890a). A quelle epoque apparaissent les expansions des cellules nerveuses de la moëlle épinière du poulet?Anat. Anz. 5, 609–613, 631–639.
51
Ramón y CajalS. (1890b). Origen y Terminación de las Fibras Nerviosas Olfatorias. Bacelona: GacSan, 1–21.
52
Ramón y CajalS. (1891). Significación fisiológica de las expansiones protoplásmicas y nerviosas de las células de la sustancia gris. Rev. Cienc. Méd. Barc. 22:23.
53
Ramón y CajalS. (1892a). La rétine des vertébrés. Cellule9, 121–133.
54
Ramón y CajalS. (1892b). Nuevo concepto de la Histología de los centros nerviosos. Conferencia III. Rev. Cienc. Méd. Barc. 18, 457–476.
55
Ramón y CajalS. (1894). Croonian Lecture: la fine structure des centres nerveux. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 55, 444–468. 10.1098/rspl.1894.0063
56
Ramón y CajalS. (1896). Sobre las relaciones de las células nerviosas con las neuróglicas. Rev. Trimest. Microgr. 1, 123–126.
57
Ramón y CajalS. (1897). Algo sobre la significación fisiológica de la neuroglia. Rev. Trimest. Microgr. 1, 33–47.
58
Ramón y CajalS. (1899). Textura del Sistema Nervioso del Hombre y de los Vertebrados. Madrid: Moya.
59
Ramón y CajalS. (1901). Estudios sobre la corteza cerebral humana. IV. Estructura de la corteza cerebral olfativa del hombre y mamíferos. Trab. Lab. Invest. Biol. 1, 1–140.
60
Ramón y CajalS. (1904). Textura del Sistema Nervioso del Hombre y los Vertebrados. Madrid: Moya.
61
Ramón y CajalS. (1913). Estudios sobre la Degeneración y Regeneración del Sistema Nervioso. Madrid: Moya.
62
Ramón y CajalS. (1917). Recuerdos de mi Vida. Vol. 2: Historia de mi Labor Científica. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
63
Ramón y CajalS. (1931). Pensamientos de Tendencia Educativa. Audiobook. Madrid: Archivo de la Palabra.
64
ResslerK. J.SullivanS. L.BuckL. B. (1993). A zonal organization of odorant receptor gene expression in the olfactory epithelium. Cell73, 597–609. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90145-G
65
RetziusG. (1892). Die endigungsweise des riechnerven, in Biologisches Untersuchungen. Neue Folge, ed RetziusG. (Stockholm: Samson and Wallin), 25–28.
66
RouxL.BenchenaneK.RothsteinJ. D.BonventoG.GiaumeC. (2011). Plasticity of astroglial networks in olfactory glomeruli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 18442–18446. 10.1073/pnas.1107386108
67
Sassoè-PognettoM. (2011). Molecular and functional heterogeneity of neural circuits: an example from the olfactory bulb. Brain Res. Rev. 66, 35–42. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.06.003
68
SchneiderS. P.MacridesF. (1978). Laminar distributions of internuerons in the main olfactory bulb of the adult hamster. Brain Res. Bull. 3, 73–82. 10.1016/0361-9230(78)90063-1
69
SchoppaN. E.KinzieJ. M.SaharaY.SegersonT. P.WestbrookG. L. (1998). Dendrodendritic inhibition in the olfactory bulb is driven by NMDA receptors. J. Neurosci. 18, 6790–6802.
70
SchwalbeG. A. (1881). Lehrbuch der Neurologie. Erlanger: E. Besold.
71
SchwartingG. A.GridleyT.HenionT. R. (2007). Notch1 expression and ligand interactions in progenitor cells of the mouse olfactory epithelium. J. Mol. Histol. 38, 543–553. 10.1007/s10735-007-9110-9
72
ShepherdG. M.ChenW.GreerC. (2004). Olfactory bulb, in The Synaptic Organization of the Brain (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 165–216
73
ShepherdG. M.ChenW. R.WillhiteD.MiglioreM.GreerC. (2007). The olfactory granule cell: from classical enigma to central role in olfactory processing. Brain Res. Rev. 55, 373–382. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.03.005
74
ShepherdG. M.ErulkarS. D. (1997). Centenary of the synapse: from Sherrington to the molecular biology of the synapse and beyond. Trends Neurosci. 20, 385–392. 10.1016/S0166-2236(97)01059-X
75
SuzukiJ.YoshizakiK.KobayashiT.OsumiN. (2013). Neural crest-derived horizontal basal cells as tissue stem cells in the adult olfactory epithelium. Neurosci. Res. 75, 112–120. 10.1016/j.neures.2012.11.005
76
ValverdeF. (1965). Studies of the Pyriform Lobe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77
ValverdeF.López-MascaraqueL. (1991). Neuroglial arrangements in the olfactory glomeruli of the hedgehog. J. Comp. Neurol. 307, 658–674. 10.1002/cne.903070411
78
VassarR.NgaiJ.AxelR. (1993). Spatial segregation of odorant receptor expression in the mammalian olfactory epithelium. Cell74, 309–318. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90422-M
79
ZhangX.FiresteinS. (2002). The olfactory receptor gene superfamily of the mouse. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 124–133. 10.1038/nn800
Summary
Keywords
olfactory bulb, olfactory cortex, olfactory epithelium, glia, neuron
Citation
Figueres-Oñate M, Gutiérrez Y and López-Mascaraque L (2014) Unraveling Cajal's view of the olfactory system. Front. Neuroanat. 8:55. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00055
Received
14 March 2014
Accepted
10 June 2014
Published
02 July 2014
Volume
8 - 2014
Edited by
Fernando De Castro, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos-SESCAM, Spain
Reviewed by
Alino Martinez-Marcos, Universidad de Castilla, Spain; Richard S. Nowakowski, Florida State University, USA
Copyright
© 2014 Figueres-Oñate, Gutiérrez and López-Mascaraque.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Laura López-Mascaraque, Instituto Cajal (CSIC), Avenida del Doctor Arce, 37, Madrid 28002, Spain e-mail: mascaraque@cajal.csic.es
†These authors have contributed equally to this work.
This article was submitted to the journal Frontiers in Neuroanatomy.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.