Abstract
Since descriptions of neural precursor cells (NPCs) were published in the late 19th century, neuroanatomists have used a variety of terms to describe these cells, each term reflecting contemporary understanding of cellular characteristics and function. As the field gained knowledge through a combination of technical advance and individual insight, the terminology describing NPCs changed to incorporate new information. While there is a trend toward consensus and streamlining of terminology over time, to this day scientists use different terms for NPCs that reflect their field and perspective, i.e., terms arising from molecular, cellular, or anatomical sciences. Here we review past and current terminology used to refer to NPCs, including embryonic and adult precursor cells of the cerebral cortex and hippocampus.
Introduction
“Stem cells” have the capacity to undergo self-renewing divisions that produce additional stem cells with the same properties and potential, and divisions that produce daughter cells that differentiate into multiple cell types. Stem cells can be “pluripotent precursor cells” that give rise to all cell types within an organism, or “multipotent precursor cells” that have the capacity to differentiate into a subset of cell types. The embryonic stem cells that are present in the inner cell mass of the blastocyst are an example of pluripotent stem cells. Many types of multipotent stem cells exist and can also be referred to as “progenitor cells.” The embryonic layers and each specific tissue, such as the central nervous system (CNS) tissue, develop from cellular divisions of progenitor cells.
“Neural progenitor cells (NPCs)” are the progenitor cells of the CNS that give rise to many, if not all, of the glial and neuronal cell types that populate the CNS. NPCs do not generate the non-neural cells that are also present in the CNS, such as immune system cells. NPCs are present in the CNS of developing embryos but are also found in the neonatal and mature adult brain, and therefore are not strictly embryonic stem cells. “Embryonic NPCs” may ultimately give rise to “adult NPCs,” as in the cerebral cortex (Merkle et al., ). NPCs are characterized based on their location in the brain, morphology, gene expression profile, temporal distribution and function. In general, embryonic NPCs have more potential than NPCs in the adult brain. NPCs can be generated in vitro by differentiating embryonic stem cells or “induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC).” iPSCs are derived from adult cells, most often from fibroblasts or blood cells, and programmed into an embryonic-like pluripotent state.
Embryonic Neural Progenitor Cells
Embryonic NPCs were first described in the fetal spinal cord by Camillo Golgi in 1885 (see Rakic, 2003). Neuroanatomists in the 19th century began to identify and characterize basic properties of NPCs and the proliferative zones in the developing brain (Kölliker, ; Magini, ; His, ; Lenhossek, ; Retzius, 1894; Schaper, 1897; Ramón y Cajal, 1911; Rakic, 2003). Work in the late 19th and early 20th century revealed mitotic cells dividing near the telencephalic ventricle and concluded these were the “germinal cells” that produced cortical neurons (His, ). Hamilton () conducted what in our knowledge is the first developmental study of NPC distribution in the developing cortex. She plotted the location of mitotic precursor cells in the cerebral cortex and spinal cord at several stages of prenatal and postnatal development in the rat and showed that mitoses were positioned in two basic locations: at the lumen of the ventricle and away from the ventricle, which she termed “ventricular” and “extra-ventricular” mitoses (Hamilton, ). Hamilton found that there was a shift in the location of mitoses during development, with most precursor cells dividing at the ventricle during early stages of development, and the majority of precursor cells dividing away from the ventricle at later stages of development (Hamilton, ). In addition, Hamilton reported morphological differences among precursor cells that correlated with the position of the dividing cell—in other words that precursor cells at the ventricle and away from the ventricle were morphologically distinct (Hamilton, ).
Embryonic Neural Proliferative Zones
Two proliferative zones in the developing cerebral cortex are commonly recognized today and using the terminology that was established in 1970 by the Boulder Committee (Angevine et al., ). The “ventricular zone (VZ)” is the primary proliferative zone that appears first during development and is adjacent to the ventricle, and the “subventricular zone (SVZ)” is the secondary proliferative zone that appears during later stages of development and is superficial to the VZ (Boulder Committee: Angevine et al., ). The only significant revision to Boulder Committee terminology in recent years stems from the work by Iain Smart and Henry Kennedy showing that the SVZ in rhesus monkeys is further subdivided into an “outer SVZ (oSVZ)” and an “inner SVZ (iSVZ)” (Smart et al., 2002). Subsequent work showed that the oSVZ is more prominent in the fetal human cortex (Fietz et al., ; Hansen et al., ), appears to be present in the developing cortex of most gyrencephalic mammals (Fietz et al., ; Reillo and Borrell, 2012), and is even present in the lissencephalic rat cortex during later stages of embryonic neurogenesis (Martínez-Cerdeño et al., ). The realization that the SVZ comprises distinct proliferative zones has stimulated significant lines of research into whether these different zones are populated by distinct NPC subtypes.
The terms that have been used to refer to NPCs in the developing cerebral cortex have varied over the past 100 years. These NPCs were initially referred to as “spongioblasts” and “fetal glia,” reflecting their presumed non-neuronal nature and non-mature glial cell morphology. The names of these cells changed over the course of time to reflect not only personal perspective but also appreciation of features that were newly revealed through application of new scientific technology. The morphology of NPCs in human and non-human primates were first characterized through whole-cell impregnation techniques such as Golgi staining, and were more fully characterized after the introduction of electron microscopy (Rakic, 1972) and immunohistochemistry (Levitt and Rakic, ). Because VZ cells in many species persist beyond birth and are arranged in a radial orientation in the telencephalon and other structures including the diencephalon and spinal cord, the combined term “radial glia (RG)” was introduced (Rakic, 1971a), and remains the most commonly used term for primary NPCs in the VZ.
Embryonic Neural Progenitor Cells
RG cells appear through differentiation of precursor cells known as “neuroepithelial cells” that initially form the walls of the neural tube. Neuroepithelial precursor cells arise from the ectoderm early in development and are recognizable by their radial alignment and bipolar morphology—one process of the cell contacts the lumen of the ventricle, and the second process usually contacts the pial meninges. Neuroepithelial cells have the potential to undergo self-renewing symmetric divisions that increase the size of the precursor cell pool in early stages of development while forming the neural plate. After closure of the neural tube, neuroepithelial cells begin to upregulate glial specific factors, at which point they are thought to transform into RG cells and acquire the potential to generate neurons and glia (Aaku-Saraste et al., ; Morest and Silver, 2003). This cellular transformation is apparent at the morphological level by the lengthening of the cellular process that contacts the pial meninges, which we refer to as “pial fiber,” and which is also referred to as “basal process.”
RG cells located in the VZ are now considered to be the primary NPC in many regions of the developing brain. In the dorsal forebrain primary RG cells in the VZ can be identified by expression of the nuclear transcription factor Pax6 (Götz et al., ) and lack of expression for additional transcription factors such as Tbr2 (Englund et al., ). RG cells have been shown to exhibit several patterns of division and generate multiple cell types in vitro and in vivo during cortical histogenesis. RG cells initially undergo symmetric divisions that produce additional RG cells and expand the proliferative population in the VZ (Takahashi et al., 1995, 1996; Cai et al., ). In vitro experiments successfully replicate this feature of NPC behavior in the developing cerebral cortex (Noctor et al., 2008). At the onset of cortical neurogenesis, RG cells begin undergoing asymmetric divisions (Caviness et al., ), which produce a self-renewed RG cell and a neuronal daughter cell (Malatesta et al., ; Hartfuss et al., ; Miyata et al., 2001; Noctor et al., 2001; Tamamaki et al., 2001).
Embryonic Neural Progenitor Cells in the Cerebral Cortex
Later work demonstrated that asymmetric RG cell divisions appear to produce most neuronal daughter cells indirectly in the cerebral cortex, by first generating an NPC daughter cell that migrates to the SVZ, where it divides symmetrically to produce a pair of daughter neurons (Haubensak et al., ; Miyata et al., 2004; Noctor et al., 2004, 2008). Mitotic NPCs that divide in the SVZ have been identified by various terms, such as “extraventricular cells” (Hamilton, ), “subependymal cells” (Allen, ; Smart, 1961), “cells that divide away from the ventricle near blood vessels (BVs)” (Sauer, 1935), “SVZ cells” (Angevine et al., ), “non-surface progenitor cells” (Miyata et al., 2004), and some researchers have also used the term “abventricular mitoses.” Currently, two interchangeable terms are used for mitotic NPCs in the SVZ: “intermediate progenitor (IP) cells” (Noctor et al., 2004), and “basal progenitor cells” (Haubensak et al., ). IP cells are generally multipolar and can therefore be distinguished from bipolar RG cells based on morphology (Noctor et al., 2004, 2008). IP cells can often be distinguished from RG cells based on location of division and, in the cerebral cortex, by expression of the Tbr2 transcription factor (Englund et al., ). Evidence gathered to date from rodents suggests that cortical neurogenesis involves a series of amplifying divisions that can be characterized as a two-step process in which: (1) RG cells divide in the VZ to produce IP cells; and (2) IP cells divide in the SVZ to produce pairs of daughter neurons (Kriegstein et al., ; Martínez-Cerdeño et al., ). As a result of this pattern of division, each RG cell division produces two daughter neurons, and potentially more, depending on how many times each IP cell divides (Hansen et al., ). Similar patterns of amplifying divisions have been identified in the ventral forebrain (Lim and Alvarez-Buylla, ) and in the adult germinal niches (Seri et al., 2004; Figure 1).
Figure 1
In the 1970s evidence was presented on the detachment of RG cells from the ventricle and subsequent translocation toward the pial surface. The translocation of these cells is more frequent toward the end of the cortical neurogenic period, and their existence was hinted in early studies of the developing cortex that examined Golgi stained material (see Schmechel and Rakic, 1979). Translocating RG cells have been reported in fixed fetal tissue obtained from human (Choi and Lapham, ; deAzevedo et al., ), macaque (Schmechel and Rakic, 1979), ferret (Voigt, 1989) and rat (Noctor et al., 2004, 2008). As in the case of IP cells, multiple terms have been used to describe translocating RG cells, including “transitional RG” (Choi and Lapham, ; deAzevedo et al., ), “transitional astroglial cells” (Schmechel and Rakic, 1979), “transforming astroglial cells” (Voigt, 1989), “transforming RG cells” (Noctor et al., 2002), “translocating cells” (Noctor et al., 2004), “intermediate RG cells” (Reillo et al., 2011; Borrell and Reillo, ) and “translocating RG cells” (Martínez-Cerdeño et al., ). These cells are now referred to as “outer RG (oRG) cells” (Hansen et al., ) and “basal RG cells” (e.g., Fietz et al., ). In vivo and in vitro experiments in embryonic rat neocortex showed that translocating RG cells express glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP; Noctor et al., 2004), are mitotic, and generate glial cells (Noctor et al., 2008; Martínez-Cerdeño et al., ). More recent evidence shows that the translocating RG retain expression of the RG cell marker Pax6 (Fish et al., ; Fietz et al., ; Hansen et al., ; Reillo et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2011; Martínez-Cerdeño et al., ; Betizeau et al., ; Gertz et al., ; Poluch and Juliano, 2015), and may produce daughter neurons (Wang et al., 2011). Evidence gathered to date support the concept that translocating RG cells contribute to the population of astrocytes that are located in the cerebral cortex, including direct observations of in vivo data from sequential developmental stages (Voigt, 1989), live imaging of translocating cells followed by analysis through immunohistochemistry and electrophysiological recordings (Noctor et al., 2008), and data from early clonal lineage studies that provided evidence for mixed neuronal/astrocyte clones (Walsh and Cepko, 1990; Figure 1).
Non-cortical Structures
Evidence suggests that at very early stages of development primary precursor cells across a number of CNS structures share fundamental characteristics. For example, mitotic precursor cells in the developing pineal gland express the nuclear transcription factor Pax6, express vimentin, undergo division at the ventricle and express phosphorylated vimentin during mitosis, as in the cortex (Ibañez-Rodriguez et al., ). In the pineal gland the primary precursor cells acquire distinct characteristics as development proceeds, at which point they no longer resemble cortical NPCs. These data support the idea of regional specialization of common NPC phenotypes that facilitate the generation of distinct cell types across the CNS.
Human Brain
Nomenclature for NPCs in the human brain has largely been adopted from experimental animal models, in particular non-human primates (Smart et al., 2002). However, examination of developing human brain tissue has strengthened the case for unique features and characteristics of NPCs in human brain (Fietz et al., ; Hansen et al., ; Gertz et al., ; Otani et al., 2016). This may reflect functional adaptations of NPCs in the human brain that facilitate the production of more neurons and glia that are required to populate larger brain structures or may result from the evolution of functionally unique precursor cells that are not present in other mammals. Recent work examining single cell genomics of NPCs in the developing human brain will undoubtedly provide many answers for these questions (Nowakowski et al., 2017; Kosik and Nowakowski, ).
Non-mammalian Vertebrates
Data from non-mammalian vertebrates, for example lizard, turtle and chicken points to NPCs that share features across a broad spectrum of vertebrates. For example, primary NPCs in the forebrain of developing lizards, turtles and chicken express Pax6 as in mammals. Furthermore, a dense band of Tbr2 cells is arranged in what appears to be an SVZ in the pallium of developing chick, and in the dorsal ventricular ridge of turtles (Martínez-Cerdeño et al., ). These data suggest that the evolution of NPC phenotypes is not recent or restricted to certain classes of mammals.
Adult Neural Progenitor Cells
NPC are recognized as residing within two well-characterized niches in the adult mammalian brain: the “subgranular zone (SGZ)” of the dentate gyrus, and the “adult SVZ” surrounding the lateral ventricles of the mature cerebral cortex. The concept that neurons could be generated in the CNS of adult animals began with reports in the 1960s that neurons were generated in the postnatal rodent brain. Smart injected thymidine-H3 in 3-day old and adult mice, and found newborn neurons near the subependymal layer in neonatal mice (Smart, 1961). Smart also reported evidence of neuron production in the adult brain but did not find surviving neurons in the cerebral cortex and concluded that newborn neurons in the adult degenerated (Smart, 1961). Postnatal neurogenesis also takes place within the external granular layer (EGL) of the cerebellum. Precursor cells in these proliferative zones are derived from precursor cells in the prenatal brain. Sidman and colleagues showed that the cerebellar EGL arises from the embryonic cerebellar VZ/SVZ, and produces neurons during postnatal development (Miale and Sidman, 1961; Sidman and Rakic, 1973). Similarly, NPC in the dentate SGZ derive from the embryonic VZ (Nowakowski and Rakic, 1981). These data provide evidence that adult neural progenitor cells derive, at least in part, from embryonic precursor cells that seed the adult proliferative zones.
Adult Neural Progenitor Cells in the Subgranular Zone
Adult NPCs in the dentate gyrus share fundamental properties with the RG cells and are therefore, referred to as “RG-like (RGL) cells” or “Type 1 cells.” Type 1 cells are located in the SGZ, have a complex radial process that extends through the granule cell layer to the molecular layer where its end-feet terminate on synapses and vasculature (Moss et al., 2016). Type 1 cells express nestin, GFAP, and Sox2, and generate adult granule neurons (Seri et al., 2001). Type 1 cells can be quiescent or proliferative, and when mitotically active can divide symmetrically and asymmetrically. During neurogenic divisions the Type 1 NPCs give rise to IP cells called “Type 2 cells” that, as in the developing cerebral cortex, express Tbr2, exhibit a multipolar morphology, and undergo a limited round of divisions that give rise to newborn neuronal cells that express doublecortin. The newborn daughter cells migrate radially into the granular cell layer where they mature into Prox1+ dentate granule neurons (Sun et al., 2015). Adult neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus has been observed in all mammals studied to date including humans (Eriksson et al., ; Ming and Song, 2011; Spalding et al., 2013; Hevner, ). The degree of adult neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus has been linked to crucial affective and cognitive behaviors, including learning, memory retention, pattern recognition and memory clearance (Sahay et al., 2011; Akers et al., ; Kitamura and Inokuchi, ; Anacker and Hen, ; for review see Berg et al., ).
Neural Progenitor Cells in the Adult Subventricular Zone
New born cells generated in the adult cortical SVZ migrate rostrally to the olfactory bulb where they disperse and differentiate into interneurons (Figure 2). Adult NPCs in the SVZ also generate glial cells. Adult NPC are referred to as “B1 cells.” B1 cells are identified by location, expression of GFAP, GLAST and BLBP, and by endfeet that contact blood vessels (Doetsch et al., ; García-Verdugo et al., ). B1 cells can be in a quiescent or proliferative state. Proliferative B1 cells undergo asymmetric divisions to generate a self-renewed B1 cells and transient progenitor cells that acts as a transit amplifying cell known as “C cells” (Ortega et al., 2013). C cells subsequently undergo divisions that generate daughter cells referred as “A cells,” which migrate into the olfactory bulb. C cells express the transcription factors Ascl1 and Dlx2, while A cells express DCX and PSA-CAM (Doetsch et al., ; for review see Lim and Alvarez-Buylla, ).
Figure 2
Adult Neural Progenitor Cells in the Third Ventricle, Fourth Ventricle, and Cerebral Aqueduct
Tanycytes are a subpopulation of ependymal cells that are located in the third ventricle surrounding the circumventricular organs. Tanycytes participate in the regulation of energy balance, energy homeostasis and chemosensitivity (Langlet et al., ; Langlet, ). Recent studies on the ultrastructural and molecular characterization of tanycytes in mouse identified these cells as E2 ependymal cells. E2 cells comprise a continuous epithelium along the floor of the cerebral aqueduct and fourth ventricle (Mirzadeh et al., 2017). Molecular properties of tanycytes in the third ventricle suggest that these cells are floor-plate derivatives (Mirzadeh et al., 2017). Proliferation of tanycytes located in the wall of the third ventricle is very limited under normal conditions in the adult rat brain, but can be induced in vivo (Mirzadeh et al., 2017; Hendrickson et al., ). More recently, it has been shown that the adult human hypothalamus contains four distinct populations of cells that express neuronal progenitor markers, each of these cell types, with the exception of tanycytes, are human-specific (Pellegrino et al., 2018).
Adult Radial Glia Cells
Some RG cells in specific regions of the developing CNS differentiate into distinct RG cell types that persist into adulthood. These include “Müller glia” in the retina, “Bergmann glia (BG)” in the cerebellum (Guo et al., ; Surzenko et al., 2013), and RG cells in the adult spinal cord. BG derive from transformed RG cells and share many properties including radial alignment, multiple branching endfeet (Rakic, 1971b), vimentin expression, neuronal migration guidance (Schmechel and Rakic, 1979; Levitt and Rakic, ; Voigt, 1989), and mitotic activity (Bascó et al., ). Müller glia in the retina also derive from transformed RG cells and stain for vimentin and GFAP (Bignami, ; Pixley and de Vellis, 1984). In the adult retina, and specifically under conditions of stress, the RG derived Müller glia retain the potential to dedifferentiate, proliferate and generate newborn retinal neurons (Fischer and Reh, ).
Conclusions
The variety of terms used by neuroscientists to describe NPCs have often reflected contemporary concepts arising from techniques that were prevalent at a given time to label, identify and view CNS cells. This is also true today to some degree. Research into CNS development has gained considerable knowledge in recent years through a combination of technical advances and individual insight. The terminology describing NPCs has evolved to incorporate newly revealed information about cellular characteristics and functions. While there has been a trend toward consensus and streamlined terminology, different terms for NPCs persist. The combined effect of research coming from diverse perspectives serves to increase our knowledge of what is ultimately most important: understanding NPC function in the developing and adult CNS.
Statements
Author contributions
Both authors wrote the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health 2R01MH094681 and Shriners Hospitals for Children funding to VM-C and R01MH101188 to SN.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
Aaku-SarasteE.HellwigA.HuttnerW. B. (1996). Loss of occludin and functional tight junctions, but not ZO-1, during neural tube closure—remodeling of the neuroepithelium prior to neurogenesis. Dev. Biol.180, 664–679. 10.1006/dbio.1996.0336
2
AkersK. G.Martinez-CanabalA.RestivoL.YiuA. P.De CristofaroA.HsiangH. L.et al. (2014). Hippocampal neurogenesis regulates forgetting during adulthood and infancy. Science344, 598–602. 10.1126/science.1248903
3
AllenE. (1912). Cessation of mitosis in central nervous system of the albino rat. J. Comp. Neurol.22, 547–568.
4
AnackerC.HenR. (2017). Adult hippocampal neurogenesis and cognitive flexibility—linking memory and mood. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.18, 335–346. 10.1038/nrn.2017.45
5
AngevineJ. B.BodianD.CoulombreA. J.EddsM. V.HamburgerV.JacobsonM.et al. (1970). Embryonic vertebrate central nervous system: revised terminology. Anat. Rec.166, 257–261. 10.1002/ar.1091660214
6
BascóE.HajósF.FülöpZ. (1977). Proliferation of Bergmann-glia in the developing rat cerebellum. Anat. Embryol.151, 219–222. 10.1007/bf00297482
7
BergD. A.BondA. M.MingG. L.SongH. (2018). Radial glial cells in the adult dentate gyrus: what are they and where do they come from?F1000Res.7:277. 10.12688/f1000research.12684.1
8
BetizeauM.CortayV.PattiD.PfisterS.GautierE.Bellemin-MénardA.et al. (2013). Precursor diversity and complexity of lineage relationships in the outer subventricular zone of the primate. Neuron80, 442–457. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.032
9
BignamiA. (1984). Glial fibrillary acidic (GFA) protein in Müller glia. Immunofluorescence study of the goldfish retina. Brain Res.300, 175–178. 10.1016/0006-8993(84)91355-6
10
BorrellV.ReilloI. (2012). Emerging roles of neural stem cells in cerebral cortex development and evolution. Dev. Neurobiol.72, 955–971. 10.1002/dneu.22013
11
CaiL.HayesN. L.TakahashiT.CavinessV. S.Jr.NowakowskiR. S. (2002). Size distribution of retrovirally marked lineages matches prediction from population measurements of cell cycle behavior. J. Neurosci. Res.69, 731–744. 10.1002/jnr.10398
12
CavinessV. S.Jr.GotoT.TaruiT.TakahashiT.BhideP. G.NowakowskiR. S. (2003). Cell output, cell cycle duration and neuronal specification: a model of integrated mechanisms of the neocortical proliferative process. Cereb. Cortex13, 592–598. 10.1093/cercor/13.6.592
13
ChoiB. H.LaphamL. W. (1978). Radial glia in the human fetal cerebrum: a combined Golgi, immunofluorescent and electron microscopic study. Brain Res.148, 295–311. 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90721-7
14
deAzevedoL. C.FalletC.Moura-NetoV.Daumas-DuportC.Hedin-PereiraC.LentR. (2003). Cortical radial glial cells in human fetuses: depth-correlated transformation into astrocytes. J. Neurobiol.55, 288–298. 10.1002/neu.10205
15
DoetschF.García-VerdugoJ. M.Alvarez-BuyllaA. (1997). Cellular composition and three-dimensional organization of the subventricular germinal zone in the adult mammalian brain. J. Neurosci.17, 5046–5061. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-13-05046.1997
16
EnglundC.FinkA.LauC.PhamD.DazaR. A.BulfoneA.et al. (2005). Pax6, Tbr2, and Tbr1 are expressed sequentially by radial glia, intermediate progenitor cells, and postmitotic neurons in developing neocortex. J. Neurosci.25, 247–251. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2899-04.2005
17
ErikssonP. S.PerfilievaE.Björk-ErikssonT.AlbornA. M.NordborgC.PetersonD. A.et al. (1998). Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nat. Med.4, 1313–1317. 10.1038/3305
18
FietzS. A.KelavaI.VogtJ.Wilsch-BräuningerM.StenzelD.FishJ. L.et al. (2010). OSVZ progenitors of human and ferret neocortex are epithelial-like and expand by integrin signaling. Nat. Neurosci.13, 690–699. 10.1038/nn.2553
19
FischerA. J.RehT. A. (2001). Muller glia are a potential source of neural regeneration in the postnatal chicken retina. Nat. Neurosci.4, 247–252. 10.1038/85090
20
FishJ. L.DehayC.KennedyH.HuttnerW. B. (2008). Making bigger brains-the evolution of neural-progenitor-cell division. J. Cell Sci.121, 2783–2793. 10.1242/jcs.023465
21
García-VerdugoJ. M.DoetschF.WichterleH.LimD. A.Alvarez-BuyllaA. (1998). Architecture and cell types of the adult subventricular zone: in search of the stem cells. J. Neurobiol.36, 234–248. 10.1002/(sici)1097-4695(199808)36:2<234::aid-neu10>3.0.co;2-e
22
GertzC. C.LuiJ. H.LamonicaB. E.WangX.KriegsteinA. R. (2014). Diverse behaviors of outer radial glia in developing ferret and human cortex. J. Neurosci.34, 2559–2570. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2645-13.2014
23
GötzM.StoykovaA.GrussP. (1998). Pax6 controls radial glia differentiation in the cerebral cortex. Neuron21, 1031–1044. 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80621-2
24
GuoZ.WangX.XiaoJ.WangY.LuH.TengJ.et al. (2013). Early postnatal GFAP-expressing cells produce multilineage progeny in cerebrum and astrocytes in cerebellum of adult mice. Brain Res.1532, 14–20. 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.08.003
25
HamiltonA. (1901). The division of differentiated cells in the central nervous system of the white rat. J. Comp. Neurol.11, 297–322. 10.1002/cne.910110403
26
HansenD. V.LuiJ. H.ParkerP. R.KriegsteinA. R. (2010). Neurogenic radial glia in the outer subventricular zone of human neocortex. Nature464, 554–561. 10.1038/nature08845
27
HartfussE.GalliR.HeinsN.GötzM. (2001). Characterization of CNS precursor subtypes and radial Glia. Dev. Biol.229, 15–30. 10.1006/dbio.2000.9962
28
HaubensakW.AttardoA.DenkW.HuttnerW. B. (2004). Neurons arise in the basal neuroepithelium of the early mammalian telencephalon: a major site of neurogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A101, 3196–3201. 10.1073/pnas.0308600100
29
HendricksonM. L.ZutshiI.WieldA.KalilR. E. (2018). Nestin expression and in vivo proliferative potential of tanycytes and ependymal cells lining the walls of the third ventricle in the adult rat brain. Eur. J. Neurosci.47, 284–293. 10.1111/ejn.13834
30
HevnerR. F. (2016). Evolution of the mammalian dentate gyrus. J. Comp. Neurol.524, 578–594. 10.1002/cne.23851
31
HisW. (1889). Die neuroblasten und deren entstehung im embryonalen mark. Abh. Kgl. sachs. Ges. Wissensch. math. phys. Kl.15, 311–372.
32
Ibañez-RodriguezM. P.NoctorS. C.MuñozE. M. (2016). Cellular basis of pineal gland development: emerging role of microglia as phenotype regulator. PLoS One11:e0167063. 10.1371/journal.pone.0167063
33
KitamuraT.InokuchiK. (2014). Role of adult neurogenesis in hippocampal-cortical memory consolidation. Mol. Brain7:13. 10.1186/1756-6606-7-13
34
KöllikerA. (1882). Embryologie ou Traité Complet du Développement de L’homme et Des Animaux Superieurs.Paris: Oxford University.
35
KosikK. S.NowakowskiT. (2018). Evolution of new miRNAs and cerebro-cortical development. Annu. Rev. Neurosci.41, 119–137. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-061822
36
KriegsteinA.NoctorS. C.Martínez-CerdeñoV. (2006). Patterns of neural stem and progenitor cell division may underlie evolutionary cortical expansion. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.7, 883–890. 10.1038/nrn2008
37
LangletF. (2014). Tanycytes: a gateway to the metabolic hypothalamus. J. Neuroendocrinol.26, 753–760. 10.1111/jne.12191
38
LangletF.MullierA.BouretS. G.PrevotV.DehouckB. (2013). Tanycyte-like cells form a blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier in the circumventricular organs of the mouse brain. J. Comp. Neurol.521, 3389–3405. 10.1002/cne.23355
39
LenhossekM. (1891). Zur kenntnis der neuroglia des menschlichen ruckenmarkes. Verh. Anat. Ges.5, 193–221.
40
LevittP.RakicP. (1980). Immunoperoxidase localization of glial fibrillary acidic protein in radial glial cells and astrocytes of the developing rhesus monkey brain. J. Comp. Neurol.193, 815–840. 10.1002/cne.901930316
41
LimD. A.Alvarez-BuyllaA. (2014). Adult neural stem cells stake their ground. Trends Neurosci.37, 563–571. 10.1016/j.tins.2014.08.006
42
LimD. A.Alvarez-BuyllaA. (2016). The adult ventricular-subventricular zone (V-SVZ) and olfactory bulb (OB) neurogenesis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.8:a018820. 10.1101/cshperspect.a018820
43
MaginiG. (1888). Sur la neuroglie et les cellules nerveuses cerebrales chez les foetus. Arch. Ital. Biol.9, 59–60.
44
MalatestaP.HartfussE.GötzM. (2000). Isolation of radial glial cells by fluorescent-activated cell sorting reveals a neuronal lineage. Development127, 5253–5263.
45
Martínez-CerdeñoV.CunninghamC. L.CamachoJ.AntczakJ. L.PrakashA. N.CziepM. E.et al. (2012). Comparative analysis of the subventricular zone in rat, ferret and macaque: evidence for an outer subventricular zone in rodents. PLoS One7:e30178. 10.1371/journal.pone.0030178
46
Martínez-CerdeñoV.CunninghamC. L.CamachoJ.KeiterJ. A.ArizaJ.LovernM.et al. (2016). Evolutionary origin of Tbr2-expressing precursor cells and the subventricular zone in the developing cortex. J. Comp. Neurol.524, 433–447. 10.1002/cne.23879
47
Martínez-CerdeñoV.NoctorS. C.KriegsteinA. R. (2006). The role of intermediate progenitor cells in the evolutionary expansion of the cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex16, i152–i161. 10.1093/cercor/bhk017
48
MerkleF. T.TramontinA. D.García-VerdugoJ. M.Alvarez-BuyllaA. (2004). Radial glia give rise to adult neural stem cells in the subventricular zone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A101, 17528–17532. 10.1073/pnas.0407893101
49
MialeI. L.SidmanR. L. (1961). An autoradiographic analysis of histogenesis in the mouse cerebellum. Exp. Neurol.4, 277–296. 10.1016/0014-4886(61)90055-3
50
MingG. L.SongH. (2011). Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian brain: significant answers and significant questions. Neuron70, 687–702. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.001
51
MirzadehZ.KusneY.Duran-MorenoM.CabralesE.Gil-PerotinS.OrtizC.et al. (2017). Bi- and uniciliated ependymal cells define continuous floor-plate-derived tanycytic territories. Nat. Commun.8:13759. 10.1038/ncomms13759
52
MiyataT.KawaguchiA.OkanoH.OgawaM. (2001). Asymmetric inheritance of radial glial fibers by cortical neurons. Neuron31, 727–741. 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00420-2
53
MiyataT.KawaguchiA.SaitoK.KawanoM.MutoT.OgawaM. (2004). Asymmetric production of surface-dividing and non-surface-dividing cortical progenitor cells. Development131, 3133–3145. 10.1242/dev.01173
54
MorestD. K.SilverJ. (2003). Precursors of neurons, neuroglia, and ependymal cells in the CNS: what are they? Where are they from? How do they get where they are going?Glia43, 6–18. 10.1002/glia.10238
55
MossJ.GebaraE.BushongE. A.Sánchez-PascualI.O’LaoiR.El M’GhariI.et al. (2016). Fine processes of Nestin-GFP-positive radial glia-like stem cells in the adult dentate gyrus ensheathe local synapses and vasculature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A113, E2536–E2545. 10.1073/pnas.1514652113
56
NoctorS. C.FlintA. C.WeissmanT. A.DammermanR. S.KriegsteinA. R. (2001). Neurons derived from radial glial cells establish radial units in neocortex. Nature409, 714–720. 10.1038/35055553
57
NoctorS. C.FlintA. C.WeissmanT. A.WongW. S.ClintonB. K.KriegsteinA. R. (2002). Dividing precursor cells of the embryonic cortical ventricular zone have morphological and molecular characteristics of radial glia. J. Neurosci.22, 3161–3173. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-08-03161.2002
58
NoctorS. C.Martínez-CerdeñoV.IvicL.KriegsteinA. R. (2004). Cortical neurons arise in symmetric and asymmetric division zones and migrate through specific phases. Nat. Neurosci.7, 136–144. 10.1038/nn1172
59
NoctorS. C.Martínez-CerdeñoV.KriegsteinA. R. (2008). Distinct behaviors of neural stem and progenitor cells underlie cortical neurogenesis. J. Comp. Neurol.508, 28–44. 10.1002/cne.21669
60
NowakowskiT. J.BhaduriA.PollenA. A.AlvaradoB.Mostajo-RadjiM. A.Di LulloE.et al. (2017). Spatiotemporal gene expression trajectories reveal developmental hierarchies of the human cortex. Science358, 1318–1323. 10.1126/science.aap8809
61
NowakowskiR. S.RakicP. (1981). The site of origin and route and rate of migration of neurons to the hippocampal region of the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol.196, 129–154. 10.1002/cne.901960110
62
OrtegaF.BerningerB.CostaM. R. (2013). Primary culture and live imaging of adult neural stem cells and their progeny. Methods Mol. Biol.1052, 1–11. 10.1007/7651_2013_22
63
OtaniT.MarchettoM. C.GageF. H.SimonsB. D.LiveseyF. J. (2016). 2D and 3D stem cell models of primate cortical development identify species-specific differences in progenitor behavior contributing to brain size. Cell Stem Cell18, 467–480. 10.1016/j.stem.2016.03.003
64
PellegrinoG.TrubertC.TerrienJ.PifferiF.LeroyD.LoyensA.et al. (2018). A comparative study of the neural stem cell niche in the adult hypothalamus of human, mouse, rat, and gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus). J. Comp. Neurol.526, 1419–1443. 10.1002/cne.24376
65
PixleyS. K.de VellisJ. (1984). Transition between immature radial glia and mature astrocytes studied with a monoclonal antibody to vimentin. Brain Res.317, 201–209. 10.1016/0165-3806(84)90097-x
66
PoluchS.JulianoS. L. (2015). Fine-tuning of neurogenesis is essential for the evolutionary expansion of the cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex25, 346–364. 10.1093/cercor/bht232
67
RakicP. (1971a). Guidance of neurons migrating to the fetal monkey neocortex. Brain Res.33, 471–476. 10.1016/0006-8993(71)90119-3
68
RakicP. (1971b). Neuron-glia relationship during granule cell migration in developing cerebellar cortex. A Golgi and electronmicroscopic study in Macacus rhesus. J. Comp. Neurol.141, 283–312. 10.1002/cne.901410303
69
RakicP. (1972). Mode of cell migration to the superficial layers of fetal monkey neocortex. J. Comp. Neurol.145, 61–83. 10.1002/cne.901450105
70
RakicP. (2003). Elusive radial glial cells: historical and evolutionary perspective. Glia43, 19–32. 10.1002/glia.10244
71
Ramón y CajalS. (1911). Histologie du Système Nerveux de L’homme et Des Vertébrés.Paris: Maloine.
72
ReilloI.BorrellV. (2012). Germinal zones in the developing cerebral cortex of ferret: ontogeny, cell cycle kinetics, and diversity of progenitors. Cereb. Cortex22, 2039–2054. 10.1093/cercor/bhr284
73
ReilloI.de Juan RomeroC.García-CabezasM. Á.BorrellV. (2011). A role for intermediate radial glia in the tangential expansion of the mammalian cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex21, 1674–1694. 10.1093/cercor/bhq238
74
RetziusG. (1894). Die neuroglia des gehirns beim menschen und bei Säugetieren. Biol. Untersuchun.6, 1–24.
75
SahayA.ScobieK. N.HillA. S.O’CarrollC. M.KheirbekM. A.BurghardtN. S.et al. (2011). Increasing adult hippocampal neurogenesis is sufficient to improve pattern separation. Nature472, 466–470. 10.1038/nature09817
76
SauerF. C. (1935). Mitosis in the neural tube. J. Comp. Neurol.62, 377–405. 10.1002/cne.900620207
77
SchaperA. (1897). Die frühesten differenzierungsvorgänge im centralnervensystem. Kritische studie und versuch einer geschichte der entwicklung nervöser substanz. Arch. Entwicklungsmech5, 81–132. 10.1007/bf02153233
78
SchmechelD. E.RakicP. (1979). A Golgi study of radial glial cells in developing monkey telencephalon: morphogenesis and transformation into astrocytes. Anat. Embryol.156, 115–152. 10.1007/bf00300010
79
SeriB.García-VerdugoJ. M.Collado-MorenteL.McEwenB. S.Alvarez-BuyllaA. (2004). Cell types, lineage, and architecture of the germinal zone in the adult dentate gyrus. J. Comp. Neurol.478, 359–378. 10.1002/cne.20288
80
SeriB.García-VerdugoJ. M.McEwenB. S.Alvarez-BuyllaA. (2001). Astrocytes give rise to new neurons in the adult mammalian hippocampus. J. Neurosci.21, 7153–7160. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-18-07153.2001
81
SidmanR. L.RakicP. (1973). Neuronal migration, with special reference to developing human brain: a review. Brain Res.62, 1–35. 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90617-3
82
SmartI. H. (1961). The subependymal layer of the mouse brain and its cell production as shown by radioautography after thymidine-H3 injection. J. Comp. Neurol.116, 325–345. 10.1002/cne.901160306
83
SmartI. H.DehayC.GiroudP.BerlandM.KennedyH. (2002). Unique morphological features of the proliferative zones and postmitotic compartments of the neural epithelium giving rise to striate and extrastriate cortex in the monkey. Cereb. Cortex12, 37–53. 10.1093/cercor/12.1.37
84
SpaldingK. L.BergmannO.AlkassK.BernardS.SalehpourM.HuttnerH. B.et al. (2013). Dynamics of hippocampal neurogenesis in adult humans. Cell153, 1219–1227. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.002
85
SunG. J.ZhouY.StadelR. P.MossJ.YongJ. H.ItoS.et al. (2015). Tangential migration of neuronal precursors of glutamatergic neurons in the adult mammalian brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A112, 9484–9489. 10.1073/pnas.1508545112
86
SurzenkoN.CrowlT.BachledaA.LangerL.PevnyL. (2013). SOX2 maintains the quiescent progenitor cell state of postnatal retinal Muller glia. Development140, 1445–1456. 10.1242/dev.071878
87
TakahashiT.NowakowskiR. S.CavinessV. S.Jr. (1995). The cell cycle of the pseudostratified ventricular epithelium of the embryonic murine cerebral wall. J. Neurosci.15, 6046–6057. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-09-06046.1995
88
TakahashiT.NowakowskiR. S.CavinessV. S.Jr. (1996). The leaving or Q fraction of the murine cerebral proliferative epithelium: a general model of neocortical neuronogenesis. J. Neurosci.16, 6183–6196. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-19-06183.1996
89
TamamakiN.NakamuraK.OkamotoK.KanekoT. (2001). Radial glia is a progenitor of neocortical neurons in the developing cerebral cortex. Neurosci. Res.41, 51–60. 10.1016/s0168-0102(01)00259-0
90
VoigtT. (1989). Development of glial cells in the cerebral wall of ferrets: direct tracing of their transformation from radial glia into astrocytes. J. Comp. Neurol.289, 74–88. 10.1002/cne.902890106
91
WalshC.CepkoC. L. (1990). Cell lineage and cell migration in the developing cerebral cortex. Experientia46, 940–947. 10.1007/bf01939387
92
WangX.TsaiJ. W.LamonicaB.KriegsteinA. R. (2011). A new subtype of progenitor cell in the mouse embryonic neocortex. Nat. Neurosci.14, 555–561. 10.1038/nn.2807
Summary
Keywords
stem cell, neural precursor cell, central nervous system, radial glial cell, intermediate progenitor cell, neurogenesis, proliferation, terminology
Citation
Martínez-Cerdeño V and Noctor SC (2018) Neural Progenitor Cell Terminology. Front. Neuroanat. 12:104. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2018.00104
Received
09 August 2018
Accepted
15 November 2018
Published
06 December 2018
Volume
12 - 2018
Edited by
Hans J. ten Donkelaar, Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands
Reviewed by
Christoph Viebahn, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany; Richard S. Nowakowski, Florida State University College of Medicine, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Martínez-Cerdeño and Noctor.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Verónica Martínez-Cerdeño vmartinezcerdeno@ucdavis.edu Stephen C. Noctor scnoctor@ucdavis.edu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.