Abstract
Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a neural peptide distributed widely in the brain and has various functions in each region. We previously reported that NPY neurons in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) are involved in the regulation of anxiety behavior. Anterograde and retrograde tracing studies suggest that neurons in the NAc project to several areas, such as the lateral hypothalamus (LH) and ventral pallidum (VP), and receive afferent projections from the cortex, thalamus, and amygdala. However, the neural connections between accumbal NPY neurons and other brain areas in mice remain unclear. In this study, we sought to clarify these anatomical connections of NPY neurons in the NAc by investigating their neural outputs and inputs. To selectively map NPY neuronal efferents from the NAc, we injected Cre-dependent adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) into the NAc of NPY-Cre mice. This revealed that NAc NPY neurons exclusively projected to the LH. We confirmed this by injecting cholera toxin b subunit (CTb), a retrograde tracer, into the LH and found that approximately 7–10% of NPY neurons in the NAc were double-labeled for mCherry and CTb. Moreover, retrograde tracing using recombinant rabies virus (rRABV) also identified NAc NPY projections to the LH. Finally, we investigated monosynaptic input to the NPY neurons in the NAc using rRABV. We found that NPY neurons in the NAc received direct synaptic connections from the midline thalamic nuclei and posterior basomedial amygdala. These findings provide new insight into the neural networks of accumbal NPY neurons and should assist in elucidating their functional roles.
Introduction
Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a neural peptide distributed widely in the brain and is well known for its role in appetite, maintenance of energy homeostasis, and anxiety. For example, NPY-expressing neurons in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus (ARC) co-express agouti-related peptide (AgRP), and their activation causes an increase in food intake (Clark et al., ; Aponte et al., ). Microinjection of NPY into the amygdala has an anxiolytic effect in rats (Heilig et al., ). Recently, we performed time- and region-specific disruption and chemogenetic activation of NPY neurons in the NAc using NPY-Cre mice, which revealed that NAc NPY neurons have a role in reducing anxiety (Yamada et al., ).
There are many NPY-positive (Chronwall et al., ; Yamada et al., ) and NPY mRNA-expressing cells in the NAc (Morris, ). Kawaguchi et al. () showed that a subset of GABA and somatostatin double-positive interneurons also express NPY in the neostriatum. These results suggest that NPY neurons in the NAc are interneurons. We previously demonstrated that overexpression of NPY in the NAc ameliorates behavioral despair in mice (Aoki et al., ). Because NPY or NPY receptor type 1 (Y1-R) agonist injection into the NAc did not affect behavioral despair, we proposed that some NPY neurons in the NAc were projection neurons (Aoki et al., ).
Previous reports using an anterograde tracer, biotinylated dextran amine (BDA), suggest that neurons in the NAc project to various regions, such as the ventral pallidum (VP), the lateral hypothalamus (LH), the entopeduncular nucleus, and substantia nigra pars compacta, in rats (Heimer et al., ; Usuda et al., ). The NAc receives afferent projections from the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), the amygdala, the hippocampus, and midline thalamic nuclei in rats (Brog et al., ). Moreover, a recent report using retrograde adeno-associated virus (AAV-retro) showed that the NAc receives projections from various cortical areas such as the mPFC, thalamus, amygdala, and CA1 region in mice (Itoga et al., ).
In this study, to provide more anatomical information on the connections of NPY neurons in the NAc, we investigated the projections of these cells using NPY-Cre mice and viral genetic mapping approaches. Moreover, we investigated monosynaptic input to the NPY neurons in the NAc using recombinant rabies virus (rRABV).
Materials and Methods
Animals
To produce NPY-Cre mice, B6.FVB(Cg)-Tg(NPY-cre)RH26Gsat/Mmucd (037423-UCD, NPY-Cre) sperm were purchased from Mutant Mouse Resource & Research Centers (Auckland, CA, USA). We entrusted the generation of NPY-Cre mice from the sperm to the RIKEN BioResource Research Center (Ibaraki, Japan). The mice were kept under a 12-h light/dark cycle (lights on at 8 a.m.). Standard food pellets and water were provided ad libitum. All animal experiments, such as production, maintenance protocols, and behavioral studies, were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (M2019-155&157, M2020-162&165).
Adeno-Associated Virus Preparation
pAAV-EF1a-DIO-mCherry (Addgene plasmid# 50462; http://n2t.net/addgene:50462; RRID: Addgene_50462) was a gift from Bryan Roth. pAAV-phSyn1(S)-FLEX-tdTomato-T2A-SypEGFP-WPRE was a gift from Hongkui Zeng (Addgene plasmid# 51509; http://n2t.net/addgene:51509; RRID: Addgene_51509) (Oh et al., ). pAAV-EF1a-FLEX-TVA-mCherry was a gift from Naoshige Uchida (Addgene plasmid# 38044; http://n2t.net/addgene:38044; RRID: Addgene_38044) (Watabe-Uchida et al., ). pAAV-FLEX-SADcvsG was generated (Mori and Morimoto, ). For recombinant AAV (rAAV) production, the vectors were cotransfected into HEK293 cells with pAAV-DJ (Cell Biolabs, San Diego, CA, USA) and pHelper (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan) using AAVpro Helper-Free system (Takara Bio Inc.). rAAV particles were extracted and purified using the AAVpro Purification Kit (Takara Bio Inc.), according to the instructions of the manufacturer. rAAV titers were determined by quantitative PCR using the AAVpro Titration Kit (Takara Bio Inc.), and aliquoted rAAVs were stored at −80°C.
Recombinant Rabies Virus Production
We produced the HEP-Flury (HEP) strain RABV using plasmid encoding glycoprotein-deficient HEP-Flury expressing GFP (pcDNA-HEPdG-GFP), helper plasmids encoding SADcvsG, which is the cytoplasmic domain of SAD glycoprotein replaced by that of CVSG (pCAGGS-SADcvsG), helper plasmids encoding HEP nucleoprotein (pcDNA-HEPN), phosphoprotein (pcDNA-HEPP), and polymerase (pcDNA-HEPL) as described in our previous study (Mori and Morimoto, ). About 1.0 × 104 BHK-T7/9 cells, expressing T7 RNA polymerase, were seeded into each well of a 100-mm dish in the medium containing 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Cells were transfected with plasmid encoding pcDNA-HEP-ΔG-GFP (2 μg), pcDNA-HEPN (1 μg), pcDNA-HEPP (0.5 μg), pcDNA-HEPL (0.25 μg), and pCAGGS-SADcvsG (0.5 μg) using TransIT-LT1 (Mirus Bio LLC, Madison, WI, USA), as described by the manufacturer. The plates were incubated for 2 days at 32°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2, and then, the supernatant was collected as HEPdG-GFP. To produce EnvA-enveloped HEPdG-GFP, HEPdG-GFP was added to wells of 80% confluent BHK-T7/9 cells on 100-mm plates and then incubated for 2 days at 32°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Thereafter, the supernatant was removed, and the cells were washed with PBS (5×) to eliminate the remaining HEPdG-GFP and incubated as before. The next day, the HEPdG-GFP-infected cells were transfected with pCAGGS-EnvA and incubated for 4 days. The supernatant containing EnvA-HEPdG-GFP was concentrated by ultracentrifugation, and aliquots of EnvA-HEPdG-GFP were stored at −80°C.
Stereotaxic Virus Injections
Mice were anesthetized with a midazolam/medetomidine/butorphanol cocktail (4, 0.3, and 5 mg/kg, respectively) intraperitoneally and placed on a stereotaxic apparatus (Narishige, Tokyo, Japan). AAVs were unilaterally microinjected (0.2–1 μl/site) into the NAc (AP, +1.2 mm from the bregma; ML, +0.8 mm from the midline; and DV, 4.3 mm below the skull surface) using a 30-gauge Hamilton syringe needle (Hamilton, Reno, NV, USA) at a rate of 0.1 μl/min. The needle was kept in place for 5–10 min after each injection before the needle was slowly removed. Some mice that received a second brain injection were housed individually, while the others were returned to their group home cage for recovery. Viral injections were verified by fluorescent image and location of cannula tip, and data from mice that were not correctly injected virus and CTb into the target region were excluded.
Visualization and Anterograde Labeling of NPY Neurons in the NAc
AAV(dj)-FLEX-mCherry (0.8 × 107 viral genome particles/ml) or AAV(dj)-FLEX-tdTomato-T2A-SypEGFP (2.7 × 1011 viral genome particles/ml) of 0.5 μl was injected into the NAc (n = 3 each). mCherry, tdTomato, and synaptophysin-EGFP (sypEGFP) expressions were allowed to develop for more than 2 weeks before the mice were deeply anesthetized and perfused.
Retrograde Tracing With CTb
To label NAc NPY neurons, 0.5 μl of AAV(dj)-FLEX-mCherry was injected into the NAc. Two weeks later, 0.5 μl of CTb (10 μg/μl; C-7771, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany), a retrograde tracer, was injected into the LH (AP, −1.2 mm from the bregma; ML, +0.9 mm from the midline; and DV, 4.3 mm below the skull surface) at a rate of 0.1 μl/min. CTb was allowed to undergo retrograde transport from the LH to the NAc for 6 days before the mice were deeply anesthetized and perfused (n = 5).
Retrograde Tracing With rRABV
AAV(dj)-FLEX-TVA-mCherry (1.5 × 1011 viral genome particles/ml) of 0.5 μl was injected into the NAc. Two weeks later, 1 μl of EnvA-HEPdG-GFP was injected into the LH, and the virus was allowed to undergo retrograde transport from the LH to the NAc for 1 week before the mice were deeply anesthetized and perfused (n = 4).
Monosynaptic Retrograde Tracing Using rRABV
To target global input to NPY neurons in the NAc, we performed monosynaptic retrograde tracing (Watabe-Uchida et al., ; Krashes et al., ). A mixture containing 0.5 μl of AAV(dj)-FLEX-TVA-mCherry and AAV(dj)-FLEX-SADcvsG (2.7 × 1011 viral genome particles/ml) was injected into the NAc. Then, 2 weeks later, 1 μl of EnvA-HEPdG-GFP was injected into the same region, and the virus was allowed to undergo retrograde transport for 1 week before the mice were deeply anesthetized and perfused (n = 6).
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Mice were anesthetized with pentobarbital (Somnopentyl; Kyoritsu Seiyaku, Tokyo, Japan) intraperitoneally and perfused with physiological saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.05 M phosphate buffer. The brain was immediately removed, postfixed with the same fixative overnight at 4°C, and then kept in 30% sucrose in 0.05 M phosphate buffer at 4°C. Serial coronal sections (40 μm) were obtained using a cryostat (CM 3050 S; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).
For visualization and anterograde tracing of NPY neurons in the NAc, we performed mCherry IHC. Every fourth section was sequentially incubated with 0.3% H2O2 and 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for 30 min, and then in PBS containing 2% normal goat serum (NGS) and 0.1% Triton X-100 for 1 h at room temperature (RT). Sections were then incubated with primary rabbit antiserum against mCherry (1:2,000; ab167453, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for 72 h at 4°C. Immunoreactive neurons were visualized with a streptavidin-biotin kit (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan), followed by 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB), as described in our previous studies (Takanami et al., ; Yamada and Kawata, ).
To confirm AAV(dj)-FLEX-tdTomato-T2A-SypEGFP infection, the brain sections were processed for GFP immunofluorescence. Every fourth section was incubated with 2% NGS in PBS for 1 h and then incubated with primary rabbit antiserum against GFP (1:2,000; ab6556, Abcam) for 72 h at 4°C. After washing with PBS, the sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-labeled donkey anti-rabbit IgG (1:1,000; A21206, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA).
For mCherry and CTb double IHC, every fourth section from the NAc to LH was incubated with 2% normal rabbit serum (NRS) in PBS for 1 h and then incubated with primary goat antiserum against CTb (1:1,000; #703, List Biological Laboratories Inc., CA, USA) and rat antiserum against mCherry (1:2,000; M11217, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 72 h at 4°C. After washing with PBS, the sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-labeled donkey anti-goat IgG (1:1,000; ab150129, Abcam) and Alexa Fluor 555-labeled donkey anti-rat IgG (1:1,000; ab150154, Abcam).
For mCherry and GFP double IHC, every fourth section was incubated with 2% NGS in PBS for 1 h and then with primary rabbit antiserum against GFP (1:2,000) and rat antiserum against mCherry (1:2,000) for 72 h at 4°C. After washing with PBS, the sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-labeled donkey anti-rabbit IgG (1:1,000) and Alexa Fluor 555-labeled donkey anti-rat IgG (1:1,000).
Statistical Analysis
Fluorescence images of high magnification were obtained on an LSM510META confocal laser-scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Fluorescence images of low magnification were observed under a fluorescence microscope (CKX53; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and images were captured using a CCD camera (DP 74; Olympus). Fluorescence intensities were manipulated to make clear the injection sites and location of neural nuclei in images of low magnification. The sections reacted with DAB were observed under a light microscope (BX50; Olympus), and images were captured using a CCD camera (DP 21; Olympus). To evaluate the numbers of labeling cells and the ratio, we determined the region of interest (ROI) in the medial part of the NAc. The size of ROI is defined as 0.45 mm × 0.45 mm, and this is the size of the photo frame in our confocal laser-scanning microscope using a 20 × objective lens. This frame is able to cover the medial part of NAc where is the target region of AAV. mCherry-positive, GFP-positive, mCherry and CTb double-positive, and mCherry and GFP double-positive cells were counted in these images. All values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Results
Visualization and Anterograde Tracing of NPY Neurons in the NAc
To visualize NPY neurons in the NAc, we injected AAV(dj)- FLEX-mCherry into the NAc in NPY-Cre mice, and mCherry was visualized by IHC. Previously, we confirmed that our AAV injection into the NAc of NPY-Cre mice caused specific expression of mCherry in accumbal NPY neurons (Yamada et al., ). We observed that a 0.2-μl volume of AAV injection at 1.2-mm anterior from the bregma spread through the NAc, with a longitudinal distance from 1.34 mm to 0.74 mm anterior to the bregma in the brain atlas (Franklin and Paxinos, ). NPY neurons in the medial part of the NAc were labeled by the injection without distinction of the core and shell of the nucleus (Figure 1). Other than NAc, we found a few mCherry-positive cells in the lateral septum (LS) and nucleus of the vertical limb of the diagonal band (VDB).
Figure 1
We analyzed mCherry projections originating from the NAc in whole-brain sections. We found many dot-like mCherry-expressing fibers in the anterior (Figures 2A,B) and posterior (Figures 2C,D) parts of the LH in coronal sections. In sagittal sections, we also found some mCherry-expressing fibers in the LH (Figures 2E,F). In addition, we found a few mCherry-expressing fibers around the LH, such as the VP and extended amygdala. mCherry-positive cell bodies and fibers were dominant in the NAc and LH, respectively, demonstrating that NPY neurons in the NAc project to the LH.
Figure 2
To confirm the finding of NPY neural connections between the NAc and the LH, we injected other Cre-dependent AAV into the NAc in NPY-Cre mice (Figure 3A). This AAV encoded the synaptic protein synaptophysin fused with EGFP (sypEGFP; AAV-FLEX-tdTomato-sypEGFP) (Oh et al., ). Many double-labeled cell bodies for tdTomato and sypEGFP were detected in the NAc around the injection site (Figures 3B,D–F). In these mice, we also observed EGFP-positive presynaptic puncta in the LH (Figures 3C,G–I).
Figure 3
Retrograde Tracing of NAc NPY Neuronal Projections to the LH Using CTb
To further clarify the neuroanatomical connections of NPY neurons between the NAc and LH, we performed retrograde tracing using CTb (n = 5). NPY is a neurotransmitter that is released from axon terminals and is usually transported to the pre-synapse after synthesis and modification of the precursor peptide within the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus (von Hörsten et al., ). To visualize NPY neuron cell bodies, we injected Cre-dependent AAV encoding mCherry into the NAc in NPY-Cre mice 2 weeks before CTb injection into the LH (Figure 4A). Injection of CTb into the LH (Figure 4B) caused the ipsilateral distribution of CTb-positive neurons in the NAc (Figures 4C,E,H). We also found several CTb and mCherry double-positive neurons in the NAc (Figures 4G,J). The numbers of mCherry-positive and CTb and mCherry double-positive neurons in the ROI (0.45 × 0.45 mm) in the NAc were 142.0 ± 27.9 and 10.2 ±2.52, respectively. The percentage of CTb-positive neurons among total mCherry-positive neurons was 7.19 ± 1.16% (Table 1).
Figure 4
Table 1
| Numbers of mCherry-ir neurons | Numbers of CTb and mCherry double-ir neurons | Percentage of CTb-ir in mCherry-ir neurons (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 142.0 ± 27.9 | 10.2 ± 2.52 | 7.19 ± 1.16 |
Numbers and percentages of mCherry and CTb-immunoreactive neurons in the NAc after CTb injection into the LH.
n = 5, 3–5 sections for each mouse. ir, immunoreactive.
Retrograde Tracing of NAc NPY Neuronal Projections to the LH Using rRABV With the EnvA-TVA System
We investigated whether other retrograde tracing methods would also reveal projections of NAc NPY neurons to the LH (n = 4). To this end, we employed Cre-dependent AAV encoding avian sarcoma leukosis virus receptor TVA (AAV-FLEX-TVA-mCherry) and avian sarcoma leukosis virus envelop protein (EnvA)-enveloped RABVdG (EnvA-HEPdG-GFP) (Sun et al., ). First, AAV-FLEX-TVA-mCherry was injected into the NAc in NPY-Cre mice to express TVA in NPY neural cell bodies and terminals, and then, EnvA-HEPdG-GFP was injected into the LH (Figures 5A,B). If there are neural terminals containing TVA from accumbal NPY neurons, EnvA-HEPdG-GFP would infect via TVA and get retrogradely transported to the NAc. We found that a considerable number of GFP-positive neurons were distributed ipsilaterally through the rostral to caudal regions of the NAc, with caudal dominance (Figure 5C). We also observed that most GFP-positive neurons in the NAc overlapped with mCherry-positive neurons (Figures 5D–F). The numbers of mCherry-positive and GFP and mCherry double-positive neurons in the ROI (0.45 × 0.45 mm) in the NAc were 99.5 ± 12.1 and 10.3 ±3.5, respectively. The percentage of GFP-positive neurons among total mCherry-positive neurons was 9.55 ± 2.15% (Table 2). When AAV-FLEX-TVA-mCherry or EnvA-HEPdG-GFP was injected into the NAc in wild-type mice, there was no mCherry- or GFP-positive neurons in the NAc (data not shown) indicating viral specificity for Cre or TVA expressing cells, respectively.
Figure 5
Table 2
| Numbers of mCherry-ir neurons | Numbers of GFP and mCherry double-ir neurons | Percentage of GFP-ir in mCherry-ir neurons (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 99.5 ± 12.1 | 10.3 ± 3.5 | 9.55 ± 2.15 |
Numbers and percentages of mCherry (NPY) and GFP-immunoreactive neurons in the NAc after EnvA-HEPdG-GFP injection into the LH.
n = 4, 3 sections for each mouse. ir, immunoreactive.
Retrograde Tracing of Global Inputs to NPY Neurons in the NAc
Finally, we performed global mapping of neurons projecting directly to the NAc NPY neurons by monosynaptic retrograde tracing with rRABV (for coronal and sagittal sections, n = 3 each). To this end, we injected AAV(dj)-FLEX-TVA-mCherry and AAV(dj)-FLEX-SADcvsG into the NAc of NPY-Cre mice. TVA and SADcvsG are required for EnvA-HEPdG-GFP infection and subsequent retrograde spread, respectively. After 14 days, EnvA-HEPdG-GFP was injected into the same area, and the brain was analyzed 7 days later (Figure 6A). Successful infection and expression of TVA and EnvA-HEPdG-GFP in the NAc were confirmed by mCherry and GFP immunostaining, respectively (Figures 6B,C). The first-infected cells were identified by coexpression of TVA-mCherry and GFP. In our experiment, neurons expressing both mCherry and GFP were detected only in the NAc (Figures 6D–F). At the injection site, there were some GFP-positive/mCherry-negative neurons, indicating that they were interneurons projecting to the NPY neurons in the same area (Figures 6D–F). Furthermore, we evaluated input neurons that were labeled retrogradely from NPY neurons in the NAc. We found that the vast majority were located in two regions, the midline thalamic nuclei (Figure 6G) and posterior regions of the basomedial amygdala (pBMA; Figure 6H). We also observed a smaller number of GFP-positive neurons in other areas, such as the parafascicular thalamic nucleus, mPFC, entorhinal cortex, insular cortex, prelimbic cortex, posterior region of the basolateral amygdala, lateral preoptic area, and VP.
Figure 6
Discussion
There are many reports suggesting afferent and efferent connections of neurons in the NAc (Heimer et al., ; Brog et al., ; Usuda et al., ; Itoga et al., ). To know the neural connection more deeply, in this study, we focused on NPY neurons in the NAc and sought to clarify the anatomical connections of these neurons using NPY-Cre mice. Our present findings provide novel insight into the projections of NAc NPY neurons to the LH. We performed anterograde and retrograde tracing using AAVs and rRABV and validated these findings with IHC. In addition, we also discovered that the main origins of neurons projecting directly to the NPY neurons in the NAc are the midline thalamic nuclei and pBMA.
Our results from NAc NPY labeling using Cre-dependent AAV and NPY-Cre mice are consistent with previous observations that neurons in the NAc project to the LH in rats (Usuda et al., ). We also performed overexpression of synaptophysin fused with EGFP exclusively in the NPY neurons of the NAc. Because synaptophysin is a synaptic vesicle protein and is preferentially expressed in axon terminals, it is often used to label projection terminals (Inoue et al., ; Ip et al., ). Although NPY-positive cell bodies are very few in the LH, there are many NPY-positive fibers in this area (Chronwall et al., ; de Quidt and Emson, ). However, the origins of these NPY fibers remain unclear. Our current findings indicate that a subset of NPY fibers in the LH originate from the NAc in mice.
As NPY acts as a neurotransmitter, it is not always localized in the perikaryal region after synthesis, depending on the neuronal activity. In vasopressin neurons, it was reported that their mRNA was expressed, but the peptide was not detected in the cell body in the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus after salt loading (Amaya et al., ). If NPY neurons are projection neurons, retrograde labeling at the cell body level might be hard upon their activity using retrograde tracers, such as CTb, fluorogold, and NPY IHC. In comparison, visualization of NPY neurons using transgenic mice and Cre-dependent AAV seems to detect cell bodies consistently, and it was useful for retrograde labeling of NPY neurons in this study. In addition, we used another retrograde labeling method employing rRABV and found that NPY neurons in the caudal part of the NAc predominantly project to the LH. This result is consistent with a previous anterograde tracing study using BDA showing that neurons in the caudal part of the NAc innervate the LH, although that study did not mention neurochemical type (Usuda et al., ).
Five G-protein-coupled receptors for NPY—Y1, Y2, Y4, Y5, and Y6—were found in the rodent brain, and all subtypes are expressed in the LH (Fetissov et al., ). Functionally, overexpression of NPY in the LH induces a long-term increase in food intake in rats (Tiesjema et al., ). Notably, the stimulatory effect of NPY injection into the LH on food intake is blocked by pretreatment with Y1 and Y5 antagonists (Gumbs et al., ), suggesting that the LH is an important brain region involved in the orexigenic effect of NPY via Y1 and Y5 receptors. These findings together with our current results suggest that NPY neurons projecting from the NAc to the LH are at least partly involved in feeding behavior. The LH is a major source of orexin and melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH)-expressing neurons (Bittencourt et al., ; Sakurai et al., ). Previous reports suggested that orexin- and MHC-expressing neurons in the LH receive synaptic inputs from the NAc in mice using nontoxic C-terminal fragments of tetanus toxin and rRABV, respectively (Sakurai et al., ; Sanathara et al., ). These two neurons innervate a wide range of brain regions and are involved in feeding behavior (Lee et al., ). These results indicate that accumbal NPY neurons projecting to the LH may act on orexin and/or MCH neurons to regulate feeding behavior. Further studies are needed to investigate which neurons in the LH receive NPY signaling from the NAc.
Using monosynaptic retrograde tracing with rRABV, we are, to our knowledge, the first to reveal that the afferent inputs to the NPY neurons in the NAc originate mainly from two regions, the midline thalamic nuclei, including the paraventricular thalamic nucleus (PVT), and pBMA. Neuronal connections between the midline thalamic nuclei or pBMA and the NAc are consistent with a previous retrograde study showing that retrograde AAV(retro)-tdTomato injection into the NAc of wild-type mice results in tdTomato expression in the midline thalamic nuclei and the BMA (Itoga et al., ). The NAc receives glutamatergic inputs from the PVT, and these inputs modulate hedonic feeding (Christoffel et al., ). Thus, NPY neurons in the NAc are directly regulated by excitatory input from PVT neurons and may modulate feeding behavior. Millan et al. reported that the NAc and pBMA mediate cue-triggered alcohol-seeking behavior (Millan et al., ). Anterograde tracing using PHA-L revealed that the pBMA mainly innervates the NAc (Petrovich et al., ). Thus, the pBMA could modulate reward-seeking behavior via NPY neurons in the NAc. Additional studies are needed to address whether neural inputs from the PVT and pBMA regulate the activity of NAc NPY neurons to modulate behaviors, such as feeding and alcohol seeking.
We also found some brain regions innervating NPY neurons in the NAc. A study combining electron microscopy and IHC identified a few synaptic junctions between glutamic acid decarboxylase-labeled terminals and NPY-labeled dendrites in the NAc (Massari et al., ). Because there are few GABAergic neurons in the PVT (Ottersen and Storm-Mathisen, ), the origins of GABAergic inputs to the NPY neurons in the NAc may be interneurons in the same nucleus or projection neurons from other regions, such as the lateral preoptic area, which contains many GABAergic neurons (Tsukahara and Yamanouchi, ). The NAc receives major dopaminergic inputs from the A10 region of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) (Ungerstedt, ). In this study, we did not detect GFP-positive cells in the VTA. This result is consistent with a previous study showing few direct synaptic contacts between tyrosine hydroxylase-positive axon terminals and NPY-positive dendrites in the NAc (Aoki and Pickel, ), suggesting that NPY neurons in the NAc do not directly connect with dopaminergic neurons from the VTA.
Our study has limitations. Because we used the local injection of AAV to label NPY neurons in the NAc, we did not visualize all accumbal NPY neurons in mice. We only found that 7–10% are projection types to the LH among the accumbal NPY neurons, which are able to visualize by AAV. Additionally, we cannot exclude the possibility that NPY neurons in the anterior part of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) also project to the LH, because the border of the posterior part of the NAc and anterior part of the BNST is ambiguous in mice, and previous reports suggested that NPY-expressing neurons exist in the anterior BNST (Walter et al., ) and neurons in the anterior BNST project to the LH (Dong and Swanson, ). In this study, we injected a low volume of AAV into the anterior parts of the NAc to minimum leak of AAVs to the anterior BNST. As a result, we confirmed that the spread of AAV was until the region where left and right anterior commissure locate separately, which are shown in Figure 1. Since this region is likely to be the posterior part of the NAc, we considered that the origin of NPY neurons projecting to the LH is the NAc predominantly.
In conclusion, we anatomically characterized NPY neurons in the NAc. NPY neurons were previously considered principally aspiny intrinsic neurons by IHC and electron microscopy (Massari et al., ). In this study, we revealed that 7–10% of accumbal NPY neurons are projection neurons. This discrepancy may be caused by differences in the methods for visualizing NPY-positive cell bodies. Previous studies using anti-NPY immunolabeling might have failed to detect the small number of NPY projection neurons in the NAc that send NPY to the axon terminals. It was difficult to detect NPY terminals originating from the NAc in other regions, suggesting that most remaining NPY neurons in the NAc may be interneurons. These findings should provide a foundation for further studies aimed at clarifying the functional importance of NPY projection neurons and NPY interneurons in the NAc.
Funding
This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grants-in-Aid [grant no. 17H03553 to MT and grant no. 15K21286 and 19K09032 to SY]
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by The Animal Care and Use Committee of the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine.
Author contributions
SY, NK, and KT performed histological experiments. TM generated the plasmid for AAV and rRABV. AT generated AAV. SY and MT wrote the paper. MT supervised the whole study. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Makoto Sugiyama and Naoto Ito for sharing BHK-T7/9 cells.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AmayaF.TanakaM.TamadaY.TanakaY.NilaverG.IbataY. (1999). The influence of salt loading on vasopressin gene expression in magno- and parvocellular hypothalamic neurons: an immunocytochemical and in situ hybridization analysis. Neuroscience89, 515–523. 10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00343-1
2
AokiC.PickelV. M. (1988). Neuropeptide Y-containing neurons in the rat striatum: ultrastructure and cellular relations with tyrosine hydroxylase- containing terminals and with astrocytes. Brain Res.459, 205–225. 10.1016/0006-8993(88)90637-3
3
AokiM.WatanabeY.YoshimotoK.TsujimuraA.YamamotoT.KanamuraN.et al. (2016). Involvement of serotonin 2C receptor RNA editing in accumbal neuropeptide Y expression and behavioural despair. Eur. J. Neurosci.43, 1219–1228. 10.1111/ejn.13233
4
AponteY.AtasoyD.SternsonS. M. (2011). AGRP neurons are sufficient to orchestrate feeding behavior rapidly and without training. Nat. Neurosci.14, 351–355. 10.1038/nn.2739
5
BittencourtJ. C.PresseF.AriasC.PetoC.VaughanJ.NahonJ. L.et al. (1992). The melanin-concentrating hormone system of the rat brain: an immuno- and hybridization histochemical characterization. J. Comp. Neurol.319, 218–45. 10.1002/cne.903190204
6
BrogJ. S.SalyapongseA.DeutchA. Y.ZahmD. S. (1993). The patterns of afferent innervation of the core and shell in the “accumbens” part of the rat ventral striatum: immunohistochemical detection of retrogradely transported fluoro-gold. J. Comp. Neurol.338, 255–78. 10.1002/cne.903380209
7
ChristoffelD. J.WalshJ. J.HeifetsB. D.HoerbeltP.NeunerS.SunG.et al. (2021). Input-specific modulation of murine nucleus accumbens differentially regulates hedonic feeding. Nat. Commun.12, 2135–22430. 10.1038/s41467-021-22430-7
8
ChronwallB. M.DiMaggioD. A.MassariV. J.PickelV. M.RuggieroD. A.O'DonohueT. L. (1985). The anatomy of neuropeptide-Y-containing neurons in rat brain. Neuroscience15, 1159–1181. 10.1016/0306-4522(85)90260-X
9
ClarkJ. T.KalraP. S.CrowleyW. R.KalraS. P. (1984). Neuropeptide Y and human pancreatic polypeptide stimulate feeding behavior in rats. Endocrinology115, 427–429. 10.1210/endo-115-1-427
10
de QuidtM. E.EmsonP. C. (1986). Distribution of neuropeptide Y-like immunoreactivity in the rat central nervous system–II. Immunohistochemical analysis. Neuroscience18, 545–618. 10.1016/0306-4522(86)90057-6
11
DongH.-W.SwansonL. W. (2004). Organization of axonal projections from the anterolateral area of the bed nuclei of the stria terminalis. J. Comp. Neurol.468, 277–298. 10.1002/cne.10949
12
FetissovS. O.KoppJ.H√∂kfeltT. (2004). Distribution of NPY receptors in the hypothalamus. Neuropeptides38, 175–188. 10.1016/j.npep.2004.05.009
13
FranklinK. B. J.PaxinosG. (2007). The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press. Available online at: https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB0484642X.
14
GumbsM. C. R.EggelsL.KoolT.UnmehopaU. A.van den HeuvelJ. K.LamuadniK.et al. (2020). Neuropeptide Y signaling in the lateral hypothalamus modulates diet component selection and is dysregulated in a model of diet-induced obesity. Neuroscience447, 28–40. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.12.014
15
HeiligM.McLeodS.BrotM.HeinrichsS. C.MenzaghiF.KoobG. F.et al. (1993). Anxiolytic-like action of neuropeptide Y: mediation by Y1 receptors in amygdala, and dissociation from food intake effects. Neuropsychopharmacology8, 357–363. 10.1038/npp.1993.35
16
HeimerL.ZahmD. S.ChurchillL.KalivasP. W.WohltmannC. (1991). Specificity in the projection patterns of accumbal core and shell in the rat. Neuroscience41, 89–125. 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90202-Y
17
InoueS.YangR.TantryA.DavisC. H.YangT.KnoedlerJ. R.et al. (2019). Periodic remodeling in a neural circuit governs timing of female sexual behavior. Cell179, 1393–1408. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.025
18
IpC. K.ZhangL.FarziA.QiY.ClarkeI.ReedF.et al. (2019). Amygdala NPY Circuits Promote the Development of Accelerated Obesity under Chronic Stress Conditions. Cell Metab30, 111–128. 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.04.001
19
ItogaC. A.ChenY.FateriC.EcheverryP. A.LaiJ. M.DelgadoJ.et al. (2019). New viral-genetic mapping uncovers an enrichment of corticotropin-releasing hormone-expressing neuronal inputs to the nucleus accumbens from stress-related brain regions. J. Comp. Neurol.527, 2474–2487. 10.1002/cne.24676
20
KawaguchiY.WilsonC. J.AugoodS. J.EmsonP. C. (1995). Striatal interneurones: chemical, physiological and morphological characterization. Trends Neurosci.18, 527–535. 10.1016/0166-2236(95)98374-8
21
KrashesM. J.ShahB. P.MadaraJ. C.OlsonD. P.StrochlicD. E.GarfieldA. S.et al. (2014). An excitatory paraventricular nucleus to AgRP neuron circuit that drives hunger. Nature507, 238–242. 10.1038/nature12956
22
LeeJ.RaycraftL.JohnsonA. W. (2021). The dynamic regulation of appetitive behavior through lateral hypothalamic orexin and melanin concentrating hormone expressing cells. Physiol. Behav.229:113234. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113234
23
MassariV. J.ChanJ.ChronwallB. M.O'DonohueT. L.OertelW. H.PickelV. M. (1988). Neuropeptide Y in the rat nucleus accumbens: ultrastructural localization in aspiny neurons receiving synaptic input from GABAergic terminals. J. Neurosci. Res.19, 171–186. 10.1002/jnr.490190202
24
MillanE. Z.ReeseR. M.GrossmanC. D.ChaudhriN.JanakP. H. (2015). Nucleus accumbens and posterior amygdala mediate cue-triggered alcohol seeking and suppress behavior during the omission of alcohol-predictive cues. Neuropsychopharmacology40, 2555–2565. 10.1038/npp.2015.102
25
MoriT.MorimotoK. (2014). Rabies virus glycoprotein variants display different patterns in rabies monosynaptic tracing. Front. Neuroanat.7:47. 10.3389/fnana.2013.00047
26
MorrisB. J. (1989). Neuronal localisation of neuropeptide Y gene expression in rat brain. J. Comp. Neurol.290, 358–368. 10.1002/cne.902900305
27
OhS. W.HarrisJ. A.NgL.WinslowB.CainN.MihalasS.et al. (2014). A mesoscale connectome of the mouse brain. Nature508, 207–214. 10.1038/nature13186
28
OttersenO. P.Storm-MathisenJ. (1984). GABA-containing neurons in the thalamus and pretectum of the rodent. an immunocytochemical study. Anat. Embryol.170, 197–207. 10.1007/BF00319005
29
PetrovichG. D.RisoldP. Y.SwansonL. W. (1996). Organization of projections from the basomedial nucleus of the amygdala: a PHAL study in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol.374, 387–420. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19961021)374:3<387::AID-CNE6>3.0.CO;2-Y
30
SakuraiT.AmemiyaA.IshiiM.MatsuzakiI.ChemelliR. M.TanakaH.et al. (1998). Orexins and orexin receptors: a family of hypothalamic neuropeptides and G protein-coupled receptors that regulate feeding behavior. Cell92, 573–585. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80949-6
31
SakuraiT.NagataR.YamanakaA.KawamuraH.TsujinoN.MurakiY.et al. (2005). Input of orexin/hypocretin neurons revealed by a genetically encoded tracer in mice. Neuron46, 297–308. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.03.010
32
SanatharaN.AlhassenL.MarmouziI.KhoudariM.PhanJ.AlhassenW.et al. (2021). Oxytocin-MCH circuit regulates monosynaptic inputs to MCH neurons and modulates social recognition memory. Neuropharmacology184:108423. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108423
33
SunL.TangY.YanK.YuJ.ZouY.XuW.et al. (2019). Differences in neurotropism and neurotoxicity among retrograde viral tracers. Mol. Neurodegener.14, 8–308. 10.1186/s13024-019-0308-6
34
TakanamiK.SakamotoH.MatsudaK.HosokawaK.NishiM.ProssnitzE. R.et al. (2010). Expression of G protein-coupled receptor 30 in the spinal somatosensory system. Brain Res.1310, 17–28. 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.004
35
TiesjemaB.AdanR. A.LuijendijkM. C.KalsbeekA.la FleurS. E. (2007). Differential effects of recombinant adeno-associated virus-mediated neuropeptide Y overexpression in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus and lateral hypothalamus on feeding behavior. J. Neurosci.27, 14139–14146. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3280-07.2007
36
TsukaharaS.YamanouchiK. (2003). Distribution of glutamic acid decarboxylase, neurotensin, enkephalin, neuropeptide Y, and cholecystokinin neurons in the septo-preoptic region of male rats. J. Reprod. Dev.49, 67–77. 10.1262/jrd.49.67
37
UngerstedtU. (1971). Stereotaxic mapping of the monoamine pathways in the rat brain. Acta Physiol. Scand. Suppl.367, 1–48. 10.1111/j.1365-201X.1971.tb10998.x
38
UsudaI.TanakaK.ChibaT. (1998). Efferent projections of the nucleus accumbens in the rat with special reference to subdivision of the nucleus: biotinylated dextran amine study. Brain Res.797, 73–93. 10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00359-X
39
von HörstenS.HoffmannT.AlfalahM.WrannC. D.KarlT.PabstR.et al. (2004). “PP, PYY and NPY: synthesis, storage, release and degradation,” in Neuropeptide Y and Related Peptides, ed. M. C. Michel (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg), 23–44.
40
WalterA. L.BartschJ. C.DatunashviliM.BlaesseP.LangeM. D.PapeH.-C. (2018). Physiological profile of neuropeptide Y-expressing neurons in bed nucleus of stria terminalis in mice: state of high excitability. Front. Cell. Neurosci.12:393. 10.3389/fncel.2018.00393
41
Watabe-UchidaM.ZhuL.OgawaS. K.VamanraoA.UchidaN. (2012). Whole-brain mapping of direct inputs to midbrain dopamine neurons. Neuron74, 858–873. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.017
42
YamadaS.IslamM. S.van KootenN.BoveeS.OhY. M.TsujimuraA.et al. (2020). Neuropeptide Y neurons in the nucleus accumbens modulate anxiety-like behavior. Exp. Neurol.327:113216. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113216
43
YamadaS.KawataM. (2014). Identification of neural cells activated by mating stimulus in the periaqueductal gray in female rats. Front. Neurosci.8:421. 10.3389/fnins.2014.00421
Summary
Keywords
Neuropeptide Y, nucleus accumbens, lateral hypothalamus, adeno-associated virus, recombinant rabies virus, Cre-LoxP
Citation
Yamada S, van Kooten N, Mori T, Taguchi K, Tsujimura A and Tanaka M (2021) Efferent and Afferent Connections of Neuropeptide Y Neurons in the Nucleus Accumbens of Mice. Front. Neuroanat. 15:741868. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2021.741868
Received
15 July 2021
Accepted
16 August 2021
Published
10 September 2021
Volume
15 - 2021
Edited by
Hiroyuki Hioki, Juntendo University, Japan
Reviewed by
Naoya Kataoka, Nagoya University, Japan; Tetsufumi Ito, University of Toyama, Japan
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Yamada, van Kooten, Mori, Taguchi, Tsujimura and Tanaka.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Masaki Tanaka mtanaka@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.