Abstract
Damage to bridging veins could lead to disastrous complications during interhemispheric approaches. We investigated the morphological and histological characteristics of bridging veins. A total of 10 cadaveric heads and 86 patients were analyzed with either anatomic dissection or neuroimaging. The morphological features of the bridging veins and superior sagittal sinus were analyzed by the endoscope. The histology of the junction between the bridging veins and superior sagittal sinus was evaluated under the microscope with staining for H&E, elastic fiber, and Masson’s staining. We found three types of bridging vein configurations in the junction between the bridging vein and superior sagittal sinus: direct connection (type A), vein runs a certain distance below the dural wall tightly (type B), and vein runs a certain distance on the lateral sinus (type C). Valvular-like fibrous cords were present on the opening of type A, trabecular in type B, and arachnoid granules in type C. Loose connective tissue connected the venous wall and dura mater in type A, sinus wall forms the inner wall of the bridging vein in type B, bridging vein accompanied by arachnoid granules in the type C. This classification enables surgeons to predict various bridging vein configurations, followed by safely achieving the optimal dissection during interhemispheric approaches.
Introduction
The surgical corridor between the hemispheres of the brain serves as a gateway to various neurosurgical pathologies. These included distal aneurysms (), arteriovenous malformations (), meningioma (; ), cavernous malformation (), and pineal tumors (; ). An understanding of the venous anatomy was crucial for the execution of interhemispheric approaches (; ). Damage to bridging veins could lead to intraoperative bleeding, postoperative venous cerebral infarction, or hemiplegia during the procedure (; ). The Sugita–Kobayashi maneuver was used to release the bridging veins, allowing safe mobilization of the cerebral hemisphere away from the falx, without comprising venous drainage (; ). During an interhemispheric approaches procedure conducted at the Liuzhou People’s Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, we successfully freed the vein along the interface between the bridging veins and the dura mater (Figure 1). We speculate that partially removing the dura mater or sinus wall could achieve the maximum degree of release in the bridging veins.
Figure 1
Imaging and standard anatomical methods were used to describe the venous configurations and drainage routes (; ; ; ; ). The direction of inflow from the bridging veins into the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) shows high variability (; ). Using anatomical landmarks, venous configurations and drainage routes were defined as a single vein join, more contiguous veins join, and venous complex joins at the same point (). In the junction between the bridging veins and SSS, the orientation of the collagen fibers changed at the level of the venous openings, with the luminal diameter becoming narrow (). Previous studies show the bridging vein and SSS by vascular casting or image analysis, which enhances the subarachnoid segment and subdural segment segments of bridging veins. How the bridging veins run after penetrating the sinus wall was unclear.
In the present study, we track the possible drainage routes of bridging veins and describe the opening of bridging veins in the SSS by endoscopy. Furthermore, we investigated the junction between bridging veins and SSS by H&E staining, Masson’s staining, and elastic fiber staining, aiming to illuminate possible bridging vein separation during interhemispheric approaches.
Materials and methods
A total of 10 anatomical specimens, obtained from a fresh autopsy, were fixed in 10% formalin solution at the Department of Anatomy of Guangxi Medical University for at least 2 weeks. All the specimens were older than 18 years (Table 1). This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Liuzhou People’s Hospital (IRB approval ID No.KY-E-01-01). The exclusion criteria included cranial cerebral trauma, neurological disease, and diseases affecting the sinuses. The family members signed individual consent giving permission for the use of resected samples for the purpose of research.
Table 1
| M ± SD/% | |
|---|---|
| Anatomical specimens | |
| Variables | |
| Mean age (years) | 61.2 ± 11.23 |
| Male, no. (%) | 6(60%) |
| Cause of death | |
| Pulmonary embolism | 2 |
| Car accident | 4 |
| Acute myocardial infarction | 2 |
| Shock | 1 |
| Pulmonary infection | 1 |
| Patients | |
| Variables | |
| Mean age (years) | 56.16 ± 16.15 |
| Male, no. (%) | 53(61.63%) |
| Diagnosis, no. (%) | |
| Suspicion of an intracranial lesion | 25(29.06%) |
| Evaluation of cerebral vein diseases | 52(60.46) |
| Tumor | 10(11.63%) |
| Type of the junction, no. (%) | |
| Type A | 52.17% |
| Type B | 29.59% |
| Type c | 18.24% |
General data of the 10 anatomical specimens and 86 patients.
Endoscope assessment
There were six male and four female specimens with a mean age at death of 61.2 ± 11.23 years (range: 43–71 years). Latex was not injected into the vein vessels and sinuses. The scalps were removed, and the cranial vault above the axial plane across the nasion and the inion was removed by surgical power device (Xishan, China). The superior sagittal sinus was flushed with tap water, and blood clots were removed by the insertion of a 4.5-gauge needle. The bridging veins were identified on the surface of the brain. A 4.5-gauge needle was used to slowly inject blue ink into the bridging veins, making them fully visible. During the procedure, we avoided inks entering the subarachnoid space.
With the cadavers in prone, fixed in Mayfield head holder, a high-definition rigid endoscope (Karl Storz, German) measuring 2.7 mm in diameter and optics (0 and 30°) was inserted into the lumen of the sinus from torcula herophili. The endoscopes were attached to a video system and a digital camera, allowing photographic documentation of relevant structures. The opening of the bridging vein in the SSS, dyed with blue pigment, received special attention.
Dissecting microscope assessment
Bridging veins – SSS complex were carefully removed en bloc by a surgical microscope (OPMI6, Zeiss). The junction between the bridging veins and SSS samples was continuously transversely sectioned with a thickness of 1 cm. The interest observative area included bridging veins, the wall of SSS, arachnoid granules, and dura mater.
Light microscopy assessment
Following sectioning, the junction between bridging veins and SSS samples was prepared for microscopic assessment. To assess those morphological characteristics, H&E staining was used, and a special staining method was used to detect collagen fibers (Masson’s trichrome) and elastic fibers (Victoria blue). The histological sections were analyzed and documented using a Zeiss Axioskop plus microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy) at 40×, 100×, and 400× magnification. Images were acquired and stored using Axio Vision software.
Enhanced MR venography analysis
The study had 86 patients enrolled, with 53 male and 33 female patients. The mean age at diagnosis was 56.16 ± 16.15 years (range: 30–75 years). MR venography analysis was performed to demonstrate the connection between the bridging vein and the venous sinus dura mater. The indications for MRI-enhanced analysis were suspicion of an intracranial lesion (25 patients) and evaluation of cerebral vein diseases (venous sinus stenosis, venous sinus thrombosis or dural arteriovenous malformations, etc.) (51 patients) or tumor (10 patients) (Table 1). Exclusion criteria were: (1) cerebral vascular diseases involved with the SSS and bridging veins; (2) intracranial tumors involved with the SSS and bridging veins; and (3) the SSS and bridging veins were unclear in the imaging. The bridging veins were tracked by PACS image software and identified the relationship between veins, the dura mater, and venous sinuses. Images were obtained as previously described ().
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 23 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois). The categorical data, including numbers of types of bridging veins and percentages, were summarized using descriptive statistics. The numerical data were expressed as means, SDs, minimums, and maximums.
Results
Microscopical observations
Bridging veins can be divided into subarachnoid segments, subdural segments, and venous sinus wall segments. The arachnoid granules were located in the subarachnoid space and closely adhered to the dura mater, dividing the bridging vein into subarachnoid and subdural segments. We identified three anatomical types of bridging vein configurations in the junction between the bridging vein and superior sagittal sinus (Table 1): direct connection (type A, Figures 2a1,a2), vein runs on the dural wall tightly (type B, Figures 2b1,b2), or vein runs a certain distance on the lateral sinus (type C, Figures 2c1,c2). One specimen can contain all anatomical types simultaneously.
Figure 2
Endoscopic observations
Valvular fibrous cords were present on the opening of type A bridging veins (Figure 2a3), covering most of the entrance to the superior cerebral vein. The trabecular-like fibrous cords exist in the opening of type B bridging veins (Figure 2b3) and divide the opening into different drainage channels. The arachnoid granules were present on the opening of type C bridging veins (Figure 2c3). Illustration shows type A direct connection in the junction between the bridging vein and SSS (a4), type B vein runs below the dural wall (b4), and type C vein runs on the lateral sinus (c4).
Morphological observations
The wall of the bridging vein was composed of uniformly arranged wavy collagen fibers. The wall of the venous sinus was composed of dense collagen fibers and arranged in a layered pattern. The junction between the bridging vein and the SSS can be divided into three histological types in Table 2. In type A, loose connective tissue connected the venous wall and dura mater (Figures 3A,a1,a2), and dense connective tissue connected the venous wall and SSS tightly (Figures 3A,a3). In type B, the upper and lower walls of the bridging vein were closely connected to SSS, and collagen fibers were arranged in various layers (Figures 3Bb1,b2). The sinus wall forms the inner wall of the bridging vein. Collagen fibers form the outer walls of the bridging vein (Figures 3B,b3). In type C, the bridging vein was located in the lateral sinus and ran on the inner side of the arachnoid granules, and the venous wall was composed of endothelial cells and a number of collagen fibers (Figures 3C,c1–c3).
Table 2
| Type | Anatomic characteristics | Morphological characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| A | Direct connection, bridging vein directly merges into the venous sinus | The venous wall was connected to the dura mater by loose connective tissue, while dense connective tissue is tightly connected to the SSS. |
| B | Bridging vein runs a certain distance on the dural wall tightly, the trabecular exists in the opening of veins. | The bridging vein’s wall had a strong connection to SSS and collagen fibers were arranged in different layers. |
| C | Bridging veins runs a certain distance on the lateral sinus. The arachnoid granules was present on the opening of veins | Endothelial cells and a significant amount of collagen fibers made up the venous wall. |
Different anatomic types of bridging veins merging into venous sinuses.
Figure 3
Imaging analysis
With the injection of iodinated contrast material, the three anatomic types at the junction between the bridging vein and SSS were delineated from normal cerebral tissues (Figure 4). Types A, B, and C made up 52.17, 29.59, and 18.24% of all patients, respectively. Moreover, the diameters in the subarachnoid segment, subdural segment, and venous sinus wall (or later sinus) segment were 2.02 ± 1.59 mm, 1.98 ± 1.67 mm, 2.00 ± 1.60 mm in type A, 3.89 ± 2.29 mm, 4.12 ± 2.18 mm, 4.03 ± 2.62 mm in type B, and 1.78 ± 0.89 mm, 1.56 ± 0.64 mm, 1.71 ± 0.89 mm in type C respectively, with statistical significance (p = 0.000; Table 3). Type A mainly presented in the area anterior to the bregma or posterior to the lambda, both types B and C appeared on the anatomical area among bregma and lambda in the SSS (Figure 5).
Figure 4
Table 3
| Types | Histological analysis | Imaging analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dura wall around BVs (mm) | BVs’s wall (μm) | Subarachnoid (mm) | Subdural (mm) | Sinus wall/later sinus (mm) | |
| A | 0.92 ± 0.32 | 238.24 ± 63.47 | 2.02 ± 1.50 | 1.98 ± 1.67 | 2.00 ± 1.60 |
| B | 0.83 ± 0.46 | 52.61 ± 33.87 | 3.89 ± 2.29 | 4.12 ± 2.18 | 4.03 ± 2.62 |
| C | 0.81 ± 0.51 | 332.7 ± 77.44 | 1.78 ± 0.89 | 1.56 ± 0.64 | 1.71 ± 0.89 |
Comparison of thickness or diameters of bridging vein in different types.
Figure 5
Discussion
This study has demonstrated three types of bridging vein configurations in the junction between the bridging vein and superior sagittal sinus, including direct connection, the vein runs a certain distance on the dural wall tightly and the vein runs a certain distance on the lateral sinus. The arachnoid granules were divided the bridging vein into subarachnoid and subdural segments. Collagen fibers, which are arranged in various layers on the sinus wall, connect the venous wall and SSS tightly. The anatomical and histological characteristics of BVs could result in safe dural incision during interhemispheric approaches.
Bridging veins drainage routes
Injuries to the parasagittal cerebrovenous structures may lead to devastating complications. Being aware of the inherent bridging veins drainage routes in the region might lower the rate of undesirable outcome. The bridging vein drainage routes were detected by anatomy, cerebral venous computed tomographic angiography (CTA), or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Some studies propose a systematic classification for the parasagittal venous network, using anatomical landmarks, venous configurations, and drainage routes was defined as a single vein joining in type 1, two or more contiguous veins joining in type 2, and venous complex joins at the same point in type 3 (). Using CTA with a focus on the direction of the BV entering the SSS, BVs draining into the SSS at the level of the coronary suture typically joined into a lacunar formation rather than proceeding straight through. The second most observed direction of inflow around the coronary suture can be described as a hairpin-shaped flow. Veins draining into the sinus presented a predominantly retrograde inflow direction. An antegrade inflow direction was also seen rostral to the coronary suture (). Some studies stated the way BV entered the SSS varied in three dimensions, and thus the BV dura entrance was difficult to precisely localize by DSA, the distribution pattern of the dural entrance of the BVs into the SSS was relatively constant, and a no tributary segment of the SSS was centered at the coronal suture and was identifiable by DSA, and all the BVs entered the SSS at an angle opposite to the direction of blood flow segment was identifiable by DSA (). Our study proposed the classification based on the histological and imaging relationship between the dura mater and the bridging vein. The classification clarifies the surgical interface, making it more practical.
Previous studies show the bridging vein and SSS by vascular casting with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene resin in acetone or image analysis. Our study tracked the bridging vein drainage routes by injecting blue ink into the bridging vein and endoscopy, displaying the venous sinus wall segment of BV. We found types of bridging vein configurations including direct connection (type A), vein running a certain distance on the dural wall tightly (type B), and vein runs on the lateral sinus (type C). Those anatomic types were confirmed through enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients.
Junction between bridging veins and SSS
Many studies focused on both bridging veins and SSS by histological analysis. The general structure of a venous wall consists of three layers. The strong tunica adventitia covers the outside of the vein. The second layer is called the tunica media, consisting of smooth muscle cells and elastin fibers. The inner layer or tunica intima is composed of multi-layered smooth endothelium covered by elastin tissue. Microscopy of sinus wall transverse sections indicated the existence of a single layer or a multiple-layered dura sinus wall (; ). The wall thickness of the dural sinus was variable in the posterior cranial fossa (). In the junction between the bridging veins and SSS, the venous endothelium stretched beyond the sinus endothelium, and the orientation of the collagen fibers changed at the level of the venous openings, with the luminal diameter becoming narrow and oval-shaped (; ). In our study, we found loose connective tissue connected the venous wall and SSS, sinus wall forms the inner wall of the bridging vein in the junction between the bridging veins and SSS. Arachnoid granules and chordae were presented on the opening of bridging veins.
Embryogenesis of bridging vein drainage
In embryonic development, the superficial venous system of the brain starts from the primitive cephalic veins, which are initially located on the inner side of the cranial nerves, gradually extending outward to connect the main vein (; ). In the fifth week, the superficial venous system was obstructed by the ear vesicles, resulting in the formation of dorsal collateral venous plexus. Some of those collateral venous plexus penetrated the dura mater, while others penetrated the pia mater (). The dorsal collateral venous plexus is divided into three groups for drainage into the primitive cephalic vein: the anterior group receives drainage from the forebrain and midbrain veins, the middle group drainage of the posterior brain, with the drainage trunk located between the trigeminal ganglia and ear vesicles, and the posterior group drains the terminal brain. Based on the development of brain tissue, skull, and dural sinus, many variations, including bridging vein configurations, drainage routes, and the dural entrance of bridging veins, appeared in the subsequent.
Clinical significance
Opening the roof of the interhemispheric microsurgical corridor to access various neuro-oncological or neurovascular lesions can be demanding because of the multiple bridging veins that drain into the sinus with their highly variable, location-specific anatomy. Opening the dura mater with maximum safety was beneficial for increasing the surgeon’s working space and degree of brain movement, thus, avoiding inadvertent avulsions, bleeding, and venous thrombosis. Based on the anatomical and histological characteristics of BVs and SSS, we summarize the different dural incisions during interhemispheric approaches (Figure 6). In type A, both loose connective tissues and arachnoid membrane are located in the space between the dura mater and veins. By using microscopic scissors to separate loose connective tissue, the surgical corridor can be exposed more effectively. In type B, the dura mater and veins share dense collagen fibers, and removing a portion of the dura mater with microsurgical scissors can maximize the surgical corridor. In type C, due to the veins running within the lateral sinus, achieve maximum exposure, by using microscopic scissors to open the dura mater of the lateral sinus wall during interhemispheric approach. Preventing intraoperative venous bleeding could be achieved by maintaining tension while pulling the dura mater and following the correct surgical interface.
Figure 6
Limitations
We recognize that our study has several limitations. First, cadaveric heads vascular replica did not perfectly reflect the flexibility of intracranial vessels. Second, it was difficult to identify types of bridging veins drainage during surgery identify types of bridging vein drainage during surgery; however, intraoperative fluorescence imaging may solve this problem. Third, more clinical practice was needed to prove the interface between bridging veins and the sinus wall.
Conclusion
This study uses anatomical and histological methods to reveal the different types of bridging veins. Meanwhile, the morphological structure of the junction between bridging veins and SSS was described. Based on the anatomic characteristics of bridging vein configurations, we speculated that the different surgical techniques used to separate bridging veins during interhemispheric approaches guide the surgeon to extend their working space to avoid venous injury.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the ethics committee of the Liuzhou people’s Hospital (IRB approval ID No. KY-E-01-01). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
YY: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft. TL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. XZe: Data curation, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. JY: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. RW: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. JZ: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. ML: Data curation, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. XZh: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the key Clinical Research of Guangxi [Grant no. GuikeAB24010282].
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Abbreviations
SSS, superior sagittal sinus; BVs, bridging veins.
References
1
AgarwalV.BarrowD. L. (2019). Interhemispheric approaches to arteriovenous malformations: 3-dimensional operative video. Oper Neurosurg16:637. doi: 10.1093/ons/opy210
2
AldeaS.ApraC.ChauvetD.Le GuérinelC.BourdillonP. (2021). Interhemispheric transcallosal approach: going further based on the vascular anatomy. Neurosurg. Rev.44, 2831–2835. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01480-x
3
AmatoM. C.TirapelliL. F.CarlottiC. G.ColliB. O. (2016). Straight sinus: ultrastructural analysis aimed at surgical tumor resection. J. Neurosurg.125, 494–507. doi: 10.3171/2015.6.JNS15584
4
AnetsbergerS.Gonzalez-LopezP.ElsawafY.Giotta LuciferoA.LuzziS.ElbabaaS. (2022). Interhemispheric approach. Acta Biomed92:e2021351. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS4.12801
5
ArzumanovG.JeongS. W.GuptaB.DabeccoR.SandovalJ.ShepardM. J.et al. (2024). Occipital-interhemispheric transtentorial pineal mass resection. Neurosurg. Focus10:V16. doi: 10.3171/2023.10.FOCVID23161
6
BalikV.UberallI.SullaI.EhrmannJ.KatoY.SullaI. J.et al. (2019). Variability in wall thickness and related structures of major Dural sinuses in posterior cranial Fossa: a microscopic anatomical study and clinical implications. Oper Neurosurg17, 88–96. doi: 10.1093/ons/opy287
7
BaltsaviasG.ParthasarathiV.AydinE.Al SchameriR. A.RothP.ValavanisA. (2015). Cranial dural arteriovenous shunts. Part 1. Anatomy and embryology of the bridging and emissary veins. Neurosurg. Rev.38, 253–263. doi: 10.1007/s10143-014-0590-2
8
BozkurtB.Mete ÇevikO.YaylaA.Ersen DanyeliA.ÜnalC.ÖzdumanK.et al. (2023). The parietooccipital interhemispheric transtentorial approach for pineal tumors. J. Clin. Neurosci.110, 39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.12.017
9
BrockmannC.KunzeS.ScharfJ. (2011). Computed tomographic angiography of the superior sagittal sinus and bridging veins. Surg. Radiol. Anat.33, 129–134. doi: 10.1007/s00276-010-0714-5
10
CaiQ.WangS.WangJ.TianQ.HuangT.QinH.et al. (2021). Classification of Peritumoral veins in convexity and parasagittal Meningiomas and its significance in preventing cerebral venous infarction. World Neurosurg.149, e261–e268. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.041
11
CasaliC.Del BeneM.DiMecoF. (2020). Falcine meningiomas. Handb. Clin. Neurol.170, 101–106. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-822198-3.00032-X
12
ElarjaniT.KhanN. R.SurS.MorcosJ. J. (2021). Occipital posterior interhemispheric supratentorial approach for resection of midbrain cavernous malformation. Neurosurg. Focus5:V6. doi: 10.3171/2021.4.FOCVID2133
13
FamaeyN.Ying CuiZ.Umuhire MusigaziG.IvensJ.DepreitereB.VerbekenE.et al. (2015). Structural and mechanical characterisation of bridging veins: a review. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.41, 222–240. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.06.009
14
HanH.TaoW.ZhangM. (2007). The dural entrance of cerebral bridging veins into the superior sagittal sinus: an anatomical comparison between cadavers and digital subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology49, 169–175. doi: 10.1007/s00234-006-0175-z
15
HapponenT.NymanM.YlikotilaP.KytöV.LaukkaD.MattilaK.et al. (2023). Imaging outcomes of emergency MRI in patients with suspected cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: a retrospective cohort study. Basel, Switzerland: Diagnostics, 13.
16
JuskysR.RockaS.SuchomlinovA. (2022). Anatomical variations of superior sagittal sinus and tributary bridging veins: a cadaveric study. Cureus14:e21979. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21979
17
KaratasD.Martínez SantosJ. L.UygurS.DagtekinA.Kurtoglu OlgunusZ.AvciE.et al. (2024). A new classification of parasagittal bridging veins based on their configurations and drainage routes pertinent to interhemispheric approaches: a surgical anatomical study. J. Neurosurg.140, 271–281. doi: 10.3171/2023.4.JNS222866
18
KiyofujiS.SoraS.GraffeoC. S.PerryA.LinkM. J. (2020). Anterior interhemispheric approach for clipping of subcallosal distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms: case series and technical notes. Neurosurg. Rev.43, 801–806. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01126-z
19
MagillS. T.TheodosopoulosP. V.McDermottM. W. (2016). Resection of falx and parasagittal meningioma: complication avoidance. J. Neuro-Oncol.130, 253–262. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2283-x
20
MooneyM. A.Al-MeftyO. (2022). Sugita-Kobayashi maneuver for preservation of large bridging veins in the interhemispheric approach: 2-dimensional operative video. Oper Neurosurg22:e46. doi: 10.1227/ONS.0000000000000022
21
MortazaviM. M.DenningM.YalcinB.ShojaM. M.LoukasM.TubbsR. S. (2013). The intracranial bridging veins: a comprehensive review of their history, anatomy, histology, pathology, and neurosurgical implications. Childs Nerv Syst29, 1073–1078. doi: 10.1007/s00381-013-2054-3
22
OharaK.InoueT.OnoH.KiyofujiS.TamuraA.SaitoI. (2017). Technique for rerouting a bridging vein that hinders the anterior interhemispheric approach: a technical note. Acta Neurochir.159, 1913–1918. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3285-y
23
PearlM.GreggL.GandhiD. (2011). Cerebral venous development in relation to developmental venous anomalies and vein of Galen aneurysmal malformations. Semin. Ultrasound CT MR32, 252–263. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2011.02.001
24
RaybaudC. (2010). Normal and abnormal embryology and development of the intracranial vascular system. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am.21, 399–426. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2010.03.011
25
SrinivasanV. M.CatapanoJ. S.SheehyJ. P.LabibM. A.LawtonM. T. (2021). Posterior interhemispheric occipital transtentorial approach for resection of a falcotentorial meningioma. Neurosurg Focus5:V2. doi: 10.3171/2021.4.FOCVID2125
26
SugitaK.KobayashiS.YokooA. (1982). Preservation of large bridging veins during brain retraction. Technical note. J. Neurosurg.57, 856–858. doi: 10.3171/jns.1982.57.6.0856
27
TomasiS. O.UmanaG. E.ScaliaG.Rubio-RodriguezR. L.CappaiP. F.CaponeC.et al. (2020). Importance of veins for neurosurgery as landmarks against brain shifting phenomenon: an anatomical and 3D-MPRAGE MR reconstruction of superficial cortical veins. Front. Neuroanat.14:596167. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2020.596167
28
VignesJ. R.DagainA.GuérinJ.LiguoroD. (2007). A hypothesis of cerebral venous system regulation based on a study of the junction between the cortical bridging veins and the superior sagittal sinus. Laboratory investigation. J. Neurosurg.107, 1205–1210. doi: 10.3171/JNS-07/12/1205
29
YeY.GaoW.XuW.GongJ.QiuM.LongL.et al. (2022). Anatomical study of arachnoid granulation in superior sagittal sinus correlated to growth patterns of Meningiomas. Front. Oncol.12:848851. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.848851
Summary
Keywords
bridging veins, interhemispheric approaches, superior sagittal sinus, anatomy, endoscopy
Citation
Ye Y, Lan T, Zeng X, Yang J, Wei R, Zhu J, Liu M and Zhu X (2024) Bridging veins: an analysis of surgical anatomy and histology correlated with interhemispheric approaches. Front. Neuroanat. 18:1406252. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2024.1406252
Received
24 March 2024
Accepted
12 November 2024
Published
28 November 2024
Volume
18 - 2024
Edited by
Alexander I. Evins, Cornell University, United States
Reviewed by
Tomoaki Suzuki, Niigata University, Japan
Alessandro De Benedictis, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital (IRCCS), Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Ye, Lan, Zeng, Yang, Wei, Zhu, Liu and Zhu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiaowen Zhu, 25769995@qq.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.