An article published in April 2012 by the Nature Reviews Neuroscience (Ziauddeen et al., 2012) calls for cautiousness in applying the addiction model to obesity. This scrupulous review described the highly consequential results from B. Hoebel's lab concerning binge-like eating behaviors of rats (Avena et al., 2008, 2009; Bocarsly et al., 2011). Referring to these results, Ziauddeen and colleagues concluded that the binge behaviors relate to the palatability of the foods independently of their macronutrient composition. Earlier, also basing on the works of Hoebel and colleagues, I have been able to draw quite a different conclusion – fat per se, although highly palatable, is not as addictive as carbohydrates and is not obesogenic (Zilberter, 2011). In yet another paper (Peters, 2012), A. Peters interpreted results of Avena et al. (2008) as a proof that “sugar addiction” fails causing obesity. Here, I take a closer look at the Hoebel's model of addiction (Avena et al., 2008, 2009; Berner et al., 2009; Avena, 2010; Avena and Gold, 2011; Bocarsly et al., 2011) while keeping in mind the role of macronutrients.
Food Addiction
An opinion exists that rather than an observational link, a causality exists between food addiction and obesity (Gold, 2004; Liu et al., 2006; Corsica and Pelchat, 2010; Johnson and Kenny, 2010). Another opinion is that such a causality does not exist (Peters, 2012) or even that a mere link between them should be considered with caution (Ziauddeen et al., 2012). The caution notwithstanding, it has been shown (and is discussed by Ziauddeen et al., 2012) that drug addiction and food addiction have similar effects, e.g., on the dopaminergic system (Volkow et al., 2008; Gearhardt et al., 2009; Stice and Dagher, 2010) where they “overlap” (Avena et al., 2012). In human subjects, food addiction has been associated with similar patterns of neural activation as substance addiction in anterior cingulated cortex, medial orbitofrontal cortex, and amygdala (Gearhardt et al., 2011b). “Common hedonic mechanisms may therefore underlie obesity and drug addiction,” concluded Johnson and Kenny (2010). Addiction liability is being discussed inline with development of obesity pharmacotherapy (Greene et al., 2011).
Carbohydrate Addiction
Carbohydrate (CHO) bias in brain's control of energy homeostasis (Zilberter, 2011) reveals itself in several well known ways including the phenomena termed “positive reward,” “hedonism,” “wanting,” “liking,” etc. (Berridge et al., 2010; Gold, 2011). The “sweet-addiction” comparable by magnitude with alcohol addiction (Kampov-Polevoy et al., 2003) and drug addictions (Stoops et al., 2010) is well documented. Gold (2011) argued that deficit in “reward” is coupled with obesity and this coupling is common for sugar, cocaine, and heroin addictions.
Gearhardt et al. (2011b), referring to the aforementioned work of Johnson and Kenny, argued that only “hyper-palatable” foods rich in fat and sugar can cause addiction. Indeed, the combination of fat and sugar resulted in a “reward dysfunction associated with drug addiction and compulsive eating, including continued consumption despite receipt of shocks” (Gearhardt et al., 2011a). A link between food addiction and obesity has also been explicitly postulated (Avena et al., 2009; Corsica and Pelchat, 2010; Gold, 2011).
Fat Addiction?
Studies from B. Hoebel lab suggest that access to CHO produces different addiction-like behaviors compared with access to fat (Avena and Gold, 2011; Bocarsly et al., 2011; Avena et al., 2012). Nutrient specificity in control of eating behavior was also shown in this lab (Berner et al., 2009). During the “sweet-chow” feeding protocol, rats compensated for the increased sucrose or glucose calories by decreasing chow intake. The authors (Avena et al., 2008) suggested that the increase in sugar intake, while not resulting in obesity, lead to an upregulation of affinity for opioid receptors, which in turn leads to the vicious circle of sugar abuse and might contribute to obesity.
In a later study (Avena et al., 2009), when rats were given intermittent daily access to “sweet-fat” food, they voluntarily restricted their intake of standard chow, similar to what has been reported with “sweet-chow” food (Avena et al., 2008). However, this time rats did become overweight unlike in the “sweet-chow” experiment. Authors concluded: “fat may be the macronutrient that results in excess body weight, and sweet taste in the absence of fat may be largely responsible for producing addictive-like behaviors.” Yet pure fat, unlike the CHO-fat combination, lacks obesogenity (Dimitriou et al., 2000). Fat combined with limited CHO content failed to cause overeating and weight gain, while excess CHO in high-fat diets caused obesity and metabolic impairment (Lomba et al., 2009).
Metabolic studies show that CHO restriction in high-fat diets exerts neuroprotective effects (Figure 1) via induction of heat-shock proteins (Maalouf et al., 2009), growth factors (Maswood et al., 2004), and mitochondrial uncoupling proteins (Liu et al., 2006). Naturally, CHO excess has neurodeteriorating effects as discussed in Zilberter (2011), Hipkiss (2008), or Manzanero et al. (2011).
Figure 1
Conclusion
Taking into account the well-defined metabolism-related features of a diet can help avoiding ambiguity in definition of diet types and aid in data interpretations. From this standpoint, macronutrients play a crucial role in determining diet's behavioral and metabolic consequences.
References
1
AvenaN. M. (2010). The study of food addiction using animal models of binge eating. Appetite55, 734–737.10.1016/j.appet.2010.09.010
2
AvenaN. M.GoldJ. A.KrollC.GoldM. S. (2012). Further developments in the neurobiology of food and addiction: update on the state of the science. Nutrition28, 341–343.10.1016/j.nut.2011.11.002
3
AvenaN. M.GoldM. S. (2011). Food and addiction – sugars, fats and hedonic overeating. Addiction106, 1214–1215; discussion 1219–1220.10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03373.x
4
AvenaN. M.RadaP.HoebelB. G. (2008). Evidence for sugar addiction: behavioral and neurochemical effects of intermittent, excessive sugar intake. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.32, 20–39.10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.04.019
5
AvenaN. M.RadaP.HoebelB. G. (2009). Sugar and fat bingeing have notable differences in addictive-like behavior. J. Nutr.139, 623–628.10.3945/jn.108.097584
6
BernerL. A.BocarslyM. E.HoebelB. G.AvenaN. M. (2009). Baclofen suppresses binge eating of pure fat but not a sugar-rich or sweet-fat diet. Behav. Pharmacol.20, 631–634.10.1097/FBP.0b013e328331ba47
7
BerridgeK. C.HoC. Y.RichardJ. M.DifeliceantonioA. G. (2010). The tempted brain eats: pleasure and desire circuits in obesity and eating disorders. Brain Res.1350, 43–64.10.1016/j.brainres.2010.04.003
8
BocarslyM. E.BernerL. A.HoebelB. G.AvenaN. M. (2011). Rats that binge eat fat-rich food do not show somatic signs or anxiety associated with opiate-like withdrawal: implications for nutrient-specific food addiction behaviors. Physiol. Behav.104, 865–872.10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.05.018
9
CorsicaJ. A.PelchatM. L. (2010). Food addiction: true or false?. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol.26, 165–169.10.1097/MOG.0b013e328336528d
10
DimitriouS. G.RiceH. B.CorwinR. L. (2000). Effects of limited access to a fat option on food intake and body composition in female rats. Int. J. Eat. Disord.28, 436–445.10.1002/1098-108X(200012)28:4<436::AID-EAT12>3.3.CO;2-G
11
GearhardtA. N.CorbinW. R.BrownellK. D. (2009). Food addiction: an examination of the diagnostic criteria for dependence. J. Addict. Med.3, 1–7.10.1097/ADM.0b013e318193c993
12
GearhardtA. N.GriloC. M.DileoneR. J.BrownellK. D.PotenzaM. N. (2011a). Can food be addictive? Public health and policy implications. Addiction106, 1208–1212.10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03301.x
13
GearhardtA. N.YokumS.OrrP. T.SticeE.CorbinW. R.BrownellK. D. (2011b). Neural correlates of food addiction. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry68, 808–816.10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.32
14
GoldM. S. (2004). Eating disorders, overeating, and pathological attachment to food: independent or addictive disorders?J. Addict. Dis.23, 1–3.10.1300/J069v23n04_01
15
GoldM. S. (2011). From bedside to bench and back again: a 30-year saga. Physiol. Behav.104, 157–161.10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.04.027
16
GreeneW. M.SylvesterM.AbrahamJ. (2011). Addiction liability of pharmacotherapeutic interventions in obesity. Curr. Pharm. Des.17, 1188–1192.
17
HipkissA. R. (2008). Energy metabolism, altered proteins, sirtuins and ageing: converging mechanisms?Biogerontology9, 49–55.10.1007/s10522-007-9110-x
18
JohnsonP. M.KennyP. J. (2010). Dopamine D2 receptors in addiction-like reward dysfunction and compulsive eating in obese rats. Nat. Neurosci.13, 635–641.10.1038/nn.2519
19
Kampov-PolevoyA. B.GarbuttJ. C.KhalitovE. (2003). Family history of alcoholism and response to sweets. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.27, 1743–1749.10.1097/01.ALC.0000099265.60216.23
20
LiuD.ChanS. L.De Souza-PintoN. C.SlevinJ. R.WerstoR. P.ZhanM.MustafaK.De CaboR.MattsonM. P. (2006). Mitochondrial UCP4 mediates an adaptive shift in energy metabolism and increases the resistance of neurons to metabolic and oxidative stress. Neuromolecular Med.8, 389–414.10.1385/NMM:8:3:389
21
LombaA.MilagroF. I.Garcia-DiazD. F.CampionJ.MarzoF.MartinezJ. A. (2009). A high-sucrose isocaloric pair-fed model induces obesity and impairs NDUFB6 gene function in rat adipose tissue. J. Nutrigenet. Nutrigenomics2, 267–272.10.1159/000308465
22
MaaloufM.RhoJ. M.MattsonM. P. (2009). The neuroprotective properties of calorie restriction, the ketogenic diet, and ketone bodies. Brain Res. Rev.59, 293–315.10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.09.002
23
ManzaneroS.GelderblomM.MagnusT.ArumugamT. V. (2011). Calorie restriction and stroke. Exp. Transl. Stroke Med.3, 8.10.1186/2040-7378-3-8
24
MaswoodN.YoungJ.TilmontE.ZhangZ.GashD. M.GerhardtG. A.GrondinR.RothG. S.MattisonJ.LaneM. A.CarsonR. E.CohenR. M.MoutonP. R.QuigleyC.MattsonM. P.IngramD. K. (2004). Caloric restriction increases neurotrophic factor levels and attenuates neurochemical and behavioral deficits in a primate model of Parkinson's disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.101, 18171–18176.10.1073/pnas.0405831102
25
PetersA. (2012). Does sugar addiction really cause obesity?. Front. Neuroenerg.3: 8. 10.3389/fnene.2011.00008
26
SticeE.DagherA. (2010). Genetic variation in dopaminergic reward in humans. Forum Nutr.63, 176–185.10.1159/000264405
27
StoopsW. W.LileJ. A.RushC. R. (2010). Monetary alternative reinforcers more effectively decrease intranasal cocaine choice than food alternative reinforcers. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.95, 187–191.10.1016/j.pbb.2010.01.003
28
VolkowN. D.WangG. J.TelangF.FowlerJ. S.ThanosP. K.LoganJ.AlexoffD.DingY. S.WongC.MaY.PradhanK. (2008). Low dopamine striatal D2 receptors are associated with prefrontal metabolism in obese subjects: possible contributing factors. Neuroimage42, 1537–1543.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.002
29
ZiauddeenH.FarooqiI. S.FletcherP. C. (2012). Obesity and the brain: how convincing is the addiction model?. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.13, 279–286.10.1038/nrm3344
30
ZilberterT. (2011). Carbohydrate-biased control of energy metabolism: the darker side of the selfish brain. Front. Neuroenergetics3: 8.10.3389/fnene.2011.00008
Summary
Keywords
addictions, carbohydrate addiction, diet-induced obesity, food addiction, high-fat diets, Ketogenic Diet, macronutrients, palatability
Citation
Zilberter T (2012) Food Addiction and Obesity: Do Macronutrients Matter?. Front. Neuroenerg. 4:7. doi: 10.3389/fnene.2012.00007
Received
18 April 2012
Accepted
02 May 2012
Published
30 May 2012
Volume
4 - 2012
Copyright
© 2012 Zilberter.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited.
*Correspondence: zilberter@gmail.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.