Abstract
Complex social behaviors are emergent properties of the brain’s interconnected and overlapping neural networks. Questions aimed at understanding how brain circuits produce specific and appropriate behaviors have changed over the past half century, shifting from studies of gross anatomical and behavioral associations, to manipulating and monitoring precisely targeted cell types. This technical progression has enabled increasingly deep insights into the regulation of perception and behavior with remarkable precision. The capacity of reductionist approaches to identify the function of isolated circuits is undeniable but many behaviors require rapid integration of diverse inputs. This review examines progress toward understanding integrative social circuits and focuses on specific nodes of the social behavior network including the medial amygdala, ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH) and medial preoptic area of the hypothalamus (MPOA) as examples of broad integration between multiple interwoven brain circuits. Our understanding of mechanisms for producing social behavior has deepened in conjunction with advances in technologies for visualizing and manipulating specific neurons and, here, we consider emerging strategies to address brain circuit function in the context of integrative anatomy.
Introduction
Technical progress in neuroscience has accelerated the capacity for resolving complex circuits with high resolution. Many of the first circuits studied in terms of both connectivity and function were small, consisting of a few dozen cells, often from invertebrate species (Selverston et al., 1976; Russell, 1979; Katz et al., 1989; Marder and Bucher, 2001). Neuroscientists studying larger circuits in vertebrates adapted the logic and conceptualizations advanced by invertebrate researchers to larger circuits (Katz et al., 2013); however, each node in vertebrate circuit diagrams typically represented a brain region containing thousands or millions of neurons. This translation was immediately effective for brain regions with repeating motifs (e.g., the retina or primary visual cortex), however, other more heterogeneous brain regions encompassed multiple overlapping and interleaved circuits, each with different functions. For example, the ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus emerged as a focal point for thermogenesis as well as hunger and aggression (Perkins et al., 1981; Lin et al., 2011; Gaur et al., 2014). Similarly, the medial amygdala (MeA) was linked to reproduction, parenting, aggression, and same-sex affiliative behaviors (Lehman et al., 1980; Unger et al., 2015; McCarthy et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2021). Here, we discuss the role of technological innovation in identifying and isolating MeA circuits specific for precise behaviors and then discuss the growing appreciation for, and need to understand, the role of broadscale integration as an organizing principle of social circuit design.
Social behaviors are critically important for survival in species throughout all branches of the animal kingdom. In vertebrates, the social behavior network (SBN) is a conserved network of brain regions essential for social behaviors. Foundational work established links between specific brain regions in the SBN and behaviors such as aggression, affiliation, reproduction, and parenting (Rosvold et al., 1954; Lammers et al., 1988; Newman, 1999). The picture emerging from these studies and subsequent research was one of dense connectivity between nodes of the SBN, with each social behavior controlled by multiple brain regions and each node of the SBN contributing to the regulation of multiple social behaviors. The interwoven nature of social behaviors and the circuits that mediate them represented an immediate challenge for neuroscientists interested in understanding the neural control for a specific social behavior. For example, electrolytic lesions lack specificity for genetic cell-type, and consequently indiscriminately impacted all neurons at the lesion site. Similarly, with few exceptions (Margolis et al., 2006) electrophysiological recordings lacked specificity for genetically defined cell-types and, accordingly, were often poorly equipped to distinguish between anatomically overlapping circuits (Chen and Toney, 2010; Bergan et al., 2014).
Social neuroscience, as a formal field of study, dates at least as far back as the work of early neuroethologists that sought to study how the brain interprets sensory cues and guides natural behaviors in a wide array of species. Progress toward understanding the neural circuit principles that mediate behavior has required adapting a wide array of concepts and techniques including careful behavioral observation, endocrinology, anatomy, electrophysiology, genetics, optogenetics and chemogenetics, single cell sequencing, and connectomics along with many other strategies (Figure 1). During the latter half of the twentieth century technological advances in monitoring neurons, genetically targeting cells, manipulating neurons, investigating neural circuits, and extracting insight from large datasets collectively ushered in a new era for identifying and causally testing the precise circuits necessary for specific social behaviors.
FIGURE 1
Timeline of the dynamic relationship between technological innovation and biological insight in neuroscience. Technical trends that have profoundly shaped mechanistic insight for social neuroscience are highlighted at the top. Arrows indicate that most developed technologies continue to shape neuroscience to this day. Key papers describing either the development of a technical innovation or the adaptation of a new technique for investigating brain function are listed at the bottom. Select icons adapted from BioRender.com.
The capacity for targeted lesions has, in some cases, reached the level of single cells (e.g., Ruta et al., 2010) and pharmacological agents increasingly allow specific targeting of single channels (e.g., Alexander et al., 2010). Advances in single cell sequencing are revealing the heterogeneity of neuron populations and are allowing neuroscientists to define a “parts list” required for circuit function that accounts for structural and molecular heterogeneity in the cells that constitute each circuit (Macosko et al., 2015; Hrvatin et al., 2017; Kamitaki et al., 2018). The introduction of optogenetics and chemogenetics make it possible to activate and inhibit circuits reversibly with high temporal precision (Boyden et al., 2005; Alexander et al., 2010). This, in combination with advances in in vivo electrophysiology (Lima et al., 2009; Cohen et al., 2012), and advances in optical imaging of neural activity (Kim et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017) allows neuroscientists to probe questions with novel behavioral resolution and strengthen links between behaviors and the circuits that mediate them. As the precision of tools improved, the resolution with which individual behaviors were understood increased proportionally (Figure 1). However, the interwoven nature of social circuits is likely an important design principle that allows integration of diverse sensory and interoceptive inputs to produce behavior well-adapted to the individual’s environment. We suggest that the same tools that accelerated insight into cell-type specific neural circuits specialized for specific social behaviors are also essential for understanding how emergent properties of social behavior are mediated by the connections between circuits and the broad integration of sensory inputs and internal states.
Isolating Neural Circuits Underlying Behavior
Untangling the intermingled circuits in the SBN depends on identifying each reliable and reproducible subset of neurons whose activity produces a specific behavior. For example, territorial aggression is triggered by sensory cues unique to each species (Tinbergen, 1951; Harrison, 1983; Goodson and Kabelik, 2009; Butler and Maruska, 2015), with chemosensory stimuli being particularly salient in rodents (Schultz and Tapp, 1973; Stowers et al., 2002; Hubbard et al., 2004; Mandiyan et al., 2005). Aggression-inducing cues are detected by both the main olfactory and vomeronasal system and conveyed to a conserved circuit for aggression that includes the ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH) as a core component. Electrical stimulation of VMH directly produces aggression (Kruk et al., 1983); however, the VMH is also critical for satiety as lesions to the VMH produce over-eating and obesity as well as sexual behaviors (Musatov et al., 2006, 2007; Xu et al., 2011; Correa et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2017; Kammel and Correa, 2020). Disentangling these interleaved behavioral circuits requires access to genetically defined cell-type specific tools to enable reproducible targeting of precise VMH subcircuits. The advent of optogenetics (Zemelman et al., 2002; Boyden et al., 2005) further established the causal relationship of the ventrolateral VMH (VMHvl) as a control center for aggression. Specific activation of VMHvl directly produced aggression regardless of the social partner (even toward an inanimate object) while silencing VMHvl suppressed the level of territorial aggression toward intruders (Lin et al., 2011). Later, VMHvl neurons expressing either estrogen receptor alpha or progesterone receptor, likely overlapping populations, were identified as central populations required for VMHvl-induced aggression (Yang et al., 2017; Hashikawa et al., 2018). Importantly, the moment-to-moment neural activity of steroid responsive subpopulations of VMHvl neurons correlates exquisitely with aggressive encounters (Falkner et al., 2014). Collectively, these studies demonstrate a clear progression through which technical innovation, specifically the advent of cell type-specific manipulations identified causal relationships between precise populations of hypothalamic neurons and aggression.
Like advances in our understanding of aggression, technical advances have enabled rapid progress in understanding the neural basis of parental behavior. The medial preoptic area of the hypothalamus (MPOA) is linked to parental behavior, sexual behavior, and sleep. As above, these interwoven circuits were disentangled through the identification of a genetic marker, galanin, that is expressed in MPOA neurons specific for parental behavior. Activation of galanin-expressing neurons promotes parental behavior, while ablating galanin-expressing neurons suppresses it and, consequently, promotes infanticidal behaviors (Wu et al., 2014). Remarkably, phenotypic heterogeneity of subpopulations of galanin-expressing neurons maps on to specific behavioral features that collectively constitute parental behaviors—for example, one sub-population of galanin-expressing neurons suppresses interactions with other adults and a separate subpopulation of galanin-expressing neurons enhances motivation to interact with offspring (Kohl et al., 2018). Like the circuits required for aggressive behaviors, molecular and genetic tools were essential to isolate the circuits controlling parental behavior in the MPOA. While the behavioral output of these circuits is clear, the computations required to reach a behavioral “decision” integrate interoceptive, sensory, neuromodulatory, and developmental inputs.
Circuits Mediating Behavioral Complexity in the Medial Amygdala
Both the VMHvl and MPOA nodes receive direct input from the MeA (Dong and Swanson, 2004; Kohl et al., 2018) that itself contains interwoven circuits devoted to nearly all social behaviors. The MeA, MPOA, and VMH are each core members of the SBN with the MeA being the primary recipient of chemosensory input, arriving directly from the accessory olfactory bulb (Scalia and Winans, 1976; Mohedano-Mariano et al., 2007; Keshavarzi et al., 2015) and indirectly from the main olfactory bulb via the cortical amygdala (Swanson and Petrovich, 1998). With strong connections to all nodes of the SBN, the MeA sits at the nexus of sensory and social behavioral processing. To understand the role of MeA in integrating information, it is important to appreciate the heterogeneity, distinct temporal dynamics of neural activity, and broad anatomical connections MeA circuits make with the rest of the brain.
The MeA is divided into four subregions with unique functional, cytoarchitectural and anatomical qualities (Swanson and Petrovich, 1998; Petrulis, 2020; Raam and Hong, 2021). Dorsal regions contain a higher abundance of inhibitory neurons, while ventral regions contain more excitatory neurons (Keshavarzi et al., 2014). Posterior regions, posterodorsal (MeApd) and posteroventral (MeApv), and the anterior MeA (MeAa) are distinguished by their response to reproductive and defensive stimuli, as well as their differential expression of transcription factors Lhx6, Lhx9, and Lhx5. For example, Lhx9 and Lhx5 expressing MeAa and the MeApv neurons preferentially respond to predation stimuli and form circuits with other defensive BNST and hypothalamic nodes, while Lhx6 neurons in the MeApd form reproductive circuits with the posterior region of the BNST and the hypothalamus (Choi et al., 2005). Molecular heterogeneity correlates with the behavioral outcomes of MeA circuits, and here we focus on the MeA circuits for reproduction and aggression.
The MeApd is known to produce many socially and reproductive relevant behaviors, including aggression (Newman, 1999). The MeApd is active during aggressive events (Kollack-Walker and Newman, 1995; Veening et al., 2005) and aggression in both sexes is suppressed by MeApd lesions (Kemble et al., 1984; Takahashi and Gladstone, 1988). Channelrhodopsin stimulation of GABAergic, and not glutamatergic, cell populations within the MeApd elevates aggressive behaviors (Hong et al., 2015). Similarly, aromatase-expressing MeApd neurons, aromatase being required for the conversion of testosterone to estradiol in the brain, regulate both intermale and maternal aggression (Unger et al., 2015). Currently, the overlap between GABAergic and aromatase-expressing MeApd neurons in the context of aggressive behavior is not clear and, therefore, it remains unknown whether these represent multiple aggression circuits or multiple nodes in a single aggression circuit in the MeA.
MeApd circuits have been linked to social behaviors beyond aggression. Activation of tachykinin-expressing GABAergic neurons in the MeApd promotes allogrooming of distressed social partners (Wu et al., 2021), while activation of glutamatergic neurons promotes asocial self-grooming (Hong et al., 2015). Sex discrimination, recognition and social memory have all been linked to the MeA and are dependent on oxytocin input to aromatase-expressing neurons (Ferguson et al., 2001; Yao et al., 2017). In vivo imaging in the form of micro endoscopes have now been used to longitudinally record MeA circuit function during specific social behaviors including social discrimination and avoidance/approach behavior, as well as through periods of plasticity including before and after sexual experience (Li et al., 2017; Miller et al., 2019). The findings from these studies show subsets of neurons functioning with distinct temporal dynamics, as well as sex differences in circuit function. Experiments that monitor the moment-to-moment activity of neurons during behavior, in line with previous studies, underscore the importance of neuronal heterogeneity as an organization principle that allows circuits to produce a large breadth of behavioral output.
The MeA and, accordingly, the behaviors mediated by the MeA display clear sex differences in anatomy and function (Cooke and Woolley, 2005; Bergan et al., 2014). However, single cell scRNA-seq data suggests surprisingly few sex differences in the abundance of neurons in each major classes of MeA neurons. Instead, molecular variation in GABAergic neurons has been suggested to underlie the vast differences in behavioral outcomes between sexes (Wu et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2019). In aromatase-expressing neurons, there are clear sex differences, with males expressing roughly 50% more aromatase neurons in the MeApd (Morris et al., 2007; Wu et al., 2009; Yao et al., 2017). Given the role of aromatase neurons in driving aggression, a sexually dimorphic social behavior (Unger et al., 2015), this variation in local MeA circuit design creates a framework for understanding how behavior can adapt between types of individuals. In addition to genetic identity, anatomical connections represent another feature by which neurons can be classified with clear ramifications for understanding complex behavioral output. For example, MeA aromatase-expressing neurons receive conspecific pheromonal information via projections from the anterior AOB (Billing et al., 2020), reflecting a model of the MeA as the third step in a chemosensory pathway that produces social behaviors (Lee et al., 2014; Unger et al., 2015; Bayless and Shah, 2016; Ishii et al., 2017). However, aromatase-expressing neurons in the MeA receive inputs from dozens of subcortical brain regions, including regions associated with fear, memory, and metabolic regulation. Indeed, the “classic” chemosensory inputs from the AOB and inputs from the BNST each make up less than 2% of the total input to MeA-aromatase neurons (Dwyer et al., 2022), implying that this single subset of MeA neurons integrates sensory input with a broad array of internal physiological and learned information prior to signaling to behavioral control centers in the hypothalamus (Figure 2A).
FIGURE 2
Structural and Functional Integration in Medial Amygdala Circuits. (A) Left: The MeA receives synaptic input from diverse circuits dedicated to stress, chemosensation, memory, and metabolic regulation. Right: Synaptic inputs are integrated in the MeA to direct innate aggressive, parental, and reproductive behaviors. Example connections represent the largest efferent and afferent connections but are not exhaustive. Bolded brain regions indicate regions with identified reciprocal connections (feedback loops) with the MeA. Connections indicated by an asterisk (*) are identified specifically for aromatase-expressing MeA neurons. Posteromedial cortical amygdala (PMCo), paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN), central amygdala (CeA), basomedial amygdala (BMA), zona incerta (ZI), hippocampal-amygdaloid transition area (HATA), ventral posteromedial nucleus (VPM), lateral hypothalamus (LH), arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus (ARC), anterior hypothalamus (AH), posterior amygdala (PA) and premotor cortex (PMv) (Wu et al., 2009; Dwyer et al., 2022). (B) The MeA receives converging chemosensory and interoceptive input from the AOB and hypothalamus, respectively. During starvation conditions, AgRP neurons release inhibitory signals onto postsynaptic Npy1R neurons in the MeA. Excitatory chemosensory input from the AOB conveys information about predator and/or conspecific cues to the MeA. This dichotomy positions the MeA for scalable outcomes in a hierarchy of survival with respect to social behaviors. When a starving mouse is presented with a conspecific intruder, it prioritizes escape behaviors over territorial aggression, and this behavior is replicated by experimental activation of AgRP fibers in the MeA. AgRP neurons release a multitude of inhibitory signals. Fast acting GABA can act on a short order, while the inhibitory tone from the neuropeptides, NPY and AGRP signals can persist for days.
The largest proportion of synaptic inputs to aromatase-expressing neurons in the MeA actually comes from other neurons within the MeA (Dwyer et al., 2022), suggesting that these neurons also integrate signals from neighboring local circuits containing different neuronal subtypes, which are in turn processing information from different compliments of brain regions. In many cases MeA neurons make reciprocal connections with other nodes in the SBN (e.g., BNST, MPOA, VMH, posterior amygdala and ventral premammillary nucleus) further highlighting the non-linear nature of the circuits mediating social behavior and demonstrating the complex orchestration of recursive feedback and broad integration at multiple levels from which complex social behaviors like parenting likely emerge.
Circuit Connections at the Intersection of Divergent Behaviors
Physical integration of circuits such as we see in the MeA likely allows integration, not just between different social behaviors, but also between social and non-social behaviors. The relationships between seemingly divergent behaviors are reflected in the organization and connections between social and non-social circuits. Early on, neuroscience research on feeding demonstrated striking results using molecularly engineered receptors to gain control Agouti-related peptide (AgRP) neurons. AgRP neuronal soma are exclusively localized to the arcuate hypothalamus and play a vital role in mounting a hunger response. Toxin-induced ablation of AgRP neurons in adult mice led to lethal aphagia (Luquet et al., 2005). In 2011, the field applied opto- and chemogenetics to AgRP neurons. AgRP neuron stimulation was sufficient to evoke feeding behavior; well-fed animals consumed food as if they were starved (Aponte et al., 2011; Krashes et al., 2011). Direct stimulation of AgRP neurons evoked at least two aspects of starvation, the drive to consume food, and decreased energy expenditure. These experiments investigated a discrete behavioral outcome; the animals were removed from a social setting and food was available at little cost.
While discrete behaviors can be assessed in a controlled laboratory setting, the stimuli that drive behavior are rarely experienced in isolation in nature. To that end, the above experiments did offer some environmental context. AgRP stimulation was performed during the rest phase and therefore the act of feeding required arousal, calling into question the role of AgRP activity and by proxy hunger itself in a complex system of competing need states. Starving animals in the wild demonstrate both behavioral and physiological adaptations: fertility is gated, avoiding the costly energetic demands of reproduction (Iwasa et al., 2018); metabolism slows, requiring fewer calories to meet basal metabolic demands (Leibel, 1990); foraging strategies shift (Krebs, 1980); and food seeking activity is prioritized over rest/sleep (Alvarenga et al., 2005).
As a population, individual AgRP neurons have a near uniform response to fasting (Betley et al., 2015). AgRP neurons send projections, with few to no collaterals, to at least 14 downstream brain regions, fostering the idea that each projection played a “parallel and redundant” role in food seeking behavior (Broberger et al., 1998; Betley et al., 2013). However, because AgRP neurons were implicated in competing need state dynamics, it was also plausible to view them as a “distribution center,” receiving cues of low energy status and distributing this information to a variety of postsynaptic targets that contribute to the collective starvation-associated state change. The power of optogenetic fiber stimulation provided a means to test these hypotheses.
With respect to this review, it is important to consider that AgRP neurons send projections to multiple relays of the social behavioral network, and it is important to note that hunger can tune the expression of social behaviors. During starvation, food seeking efforts become dominant, to the extent that species of prey will migrate out of their protected territorial safe zone and seek food in areas that are more susceptible to predation (Krebs, 1980). Evidence of AgRP communication to the MeA was shown by projection mapping studies (Broberger et al., 1998; Padilla et al., 2016). Adding to this, inhibitory AgRP neurons co-express NPY and both NPY receptors along with melanocortin 4 receptors are expressed in the MeA, further highlighting the remarkable heterogeneity of MeA neurons (Figure 2B; Kishi et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2003; Padilla et al., 2016). It was proposed that the starved state may tune territorial aggression via communication from AgRP neurons to the MeA with the rationale that during starvation, the cost of territorial defense is outweighed by the animal’s primal drive to find and consume food. Stimulation of AgRP fibers in the MeA was sufficient to reduce territorial aggression of resident males toward subordinate conspecific male intruders (Padilla et al., 2016). In alignment with a shift in priorities, stimulation of AgRP fibers in the MeA produced more escape behaviors in the presence of an intruder indicating a reduced motivation for antagonistic social interactions (Padilla et al., 2016). In this experimental paradigm, the MeA receives converging input from at least two stimuli and demonstrates the power of a dominant need state in decision making. Indeed, social circuit function is fundamentally altered by AgRP neuron signaling through a collective group of physiological changes that are attributed to starved state adaptations in wild animals (Dietrich et al., 2015; Burnett et al., 2016, 2019; Jikomes et al., 2016; Padilla et al., 2017; Alhadeff et al., 2018; Goldstein et al., 2018; Xia et al., 2021).
An appreciation for the importance of behavioral integration has similarly grown out of research on the circuits that control pain sensitivity. The initial discovery that descending projections from the brainstem were capable of endogenously modulating pain set the stage for decades of fruitful research into the role of raphe magnus neurons in gating an animal’s sensitivity to painful stimuli (Basbaum et al., 1978; Basbaum and Fields, 1978). Raphe neurons project to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord and the activities of raphe neurons modulate sensitivity to painful stimuli through two opposing groups of neurons. ON cell activation upregulates sensitivity to pain while OFF cell activation decreases sensitivity to pain (Mason and Fields, 1989; Skinner et al., 1997) — collectively enabling bidirectional control of pain sensitivity. Subsequent research into raphe magnus function investigated the behavioral conditions during which ON and OFF cells are active and found that the current behavioral state dramatically influenced activity in the raphe magnus (Leung and Mason, 1999). Behavioral states including sleep, feeding, and sex correlate with both reduced pain sensitivity and activation of raphe magnus OFF cells (Mason, 2001). Thus, while raphe magnus neurons are essential for modulating sensitivity to pain, descending pain modulation may be best understood in service of defending critically important behavioral states such as sleep, sex, and feeding from interruption. Indeed, raphe magnus neurons have access to information about sex, feeding, and sleep and, collectively, these behavioral states provide the context for how pain sensitivity is regulated on a moment-to-moment basis.
Neuromodulation of Behavior Circuits
Thus far, we have discussed how neurons connect locally and brain-wide to form social circuits. But social circuits also vary between individuals and over a range of timescales. For example, the sensory stimuli that drive strong responses in MeA neurons differ between males and females and also change as an animal ages (Morris et al., 2007; Bergan et al., 2014; Yao et al., 2017). Indeed, many social circuits undergo developmental organization and activation phases during which the probabilistic landscape of potential behaviors is remodeled (Figure 3A). And among the physical connections between neurons are modulatory systems that can alter the sensitivity of individual neurons within the circuit, making them more or less prone to firing, and thereby influencing which behaviors a circuit produces.
FIGURE 3
Multiple Influences on the Energy Landscape of Social Circuit Function. Each energy landscape represents the probability of behavioral outcomes over three different timescales. Highlighted periods of time represent epochs during which circuit functions change, transiently or permanently, because of developmental, neuromodulatory, or sensory and interoceptive events. The depth of a given “energy well” is proportional to the likelihood of a specific behavior with deep troughs representing highly probably behaviors. Ultimately, the output of a social circuit represents the integration of these energy constraints. (A) Development. Puberty represents a developmental transition point during which the energy landscape of social circuits is dramatically reorganized to favor adult behaviors. The resulting energy landscape is, in large part, persistent through life. (B) Neuromodulation. Changes in neuromodulatory tone (e.g., steroid hormones or neuropeptides), such as those that occur during the postpartum period, persist for hours to weeks during which a subtle change to the energy landscape alters the likelihood of multiple behaviors. (C) Sensory input. Rapid fluctuations (milliseconds to minutes) in the energy landscape of social circuits are driven by dynamic and transient sensory and interoceptive input including the transduction of sensory cues during social interactions. Time symbols created with BioRender.com.
Neuromodulatory effects are caused by the action of a wide range of signaling molecules, including molecules like serotonin and dopamine that can also act as neurotransmitters, neuropeptides like vasopressin and oxytocin, and steroid hormones like testosterone and estradiol (Remage-Healey, 2014). Neuromodulators may arrive from peripheral sources via the circulatory system or be secreted locally by neurons, reaching their targets either directly by synaptic transmission or indirectly by volume transmission (Nadim and Bucher, 2014). Some bind to receptors in the cell membrane, triggering second-messenger systems that change neuron activity on timescales on the order of minutes to hours (Taxier et al., 2020), others, particularly steroid hormones, may produce longer-term effects by modifying gene expression (Kelly et al., 2013; Campbell and Herbison, 2014; Nadim and Bucher, 2014). Importantly, neuromodulatory signaling, including both neuropeptides and steroid hormones, is rife in the SBN and likely affects nearly all circuits devoted to social behavior.
Because neuromodulators change how neurons behave within a circuit but have little effect on the physical structure of that circuit, they can induce transient dynamic changes within circuits in response to specific changes in internal and external environments on timescales longer (hours to weeks) than traditional neurotransmission (Figure 3B; Marder, 2012; Remage-Healey, 2014). This flexibility lets animals shift temporarily from one behavioral state to another: for example, changes to local estradiol levels in brain tissue rapidly affects male sexual motivation in quail (Cornil et al., 2018); in mice, higher progesterone levels during diestrus preferentially dampen the activity of VNO neurons that detect male pheromones, turning off female courtship and copulatory behaviors until progesterone levels drop during estrus (Dey et al., 2015). Moreover, because the action of each neuromodulatory molecule depends on receptor binding, its effects are targeted to only the subset of neurons in a circuit that express the specific receptors it binds to.
Neuromodulation in a circuit can be complex. The strength of any specific neuromodulator’s effect on its target neurons can change in concert with local concentrations of that molecule, as demonstrated by the effects of aromatase inhibitors on estradiol-mediated sexual behaviors in quail (Cornil et al., 2006), goldfish (Lord et al., 2009), and mice (Taziaux et al., 2007), and on aggressive behaviors in mice and birds (Heimovics et al., 2015). Upregulation or downregulation of a neuromodulatory receptor can have similar effects (Kenakin, 2004). Complicating things even more, individual neurons can express more than one type of neuromodulatory receptor (Shughrue et al., 1998; Ochiai et al., 2004; Nadim and Bucher, 2014), and the neurons that populate a circuit can be heterogeneous, with each expressing receptors for a different suite of neuromodulators. Furthermore, neuron activity may also be modified by signals from adjacent glia, which may also be subject to neuromodulatory molecules (Wahis et al., 2021). This means that a circuit can be simultaneously subject to multiple types of modulation, whose actions may produce opposing effects (Ogawa et al., 1997, 1999) or potentially complement one another.
Experimentally observing the effects of neuromodulation on circuits is understandably challenging. But new in vivo technological advances in electrophysiology paired with genetic targeting and activity markers open the possibility of observing circuit and network dynamics in real time. One such example includes micro endoscopes and fiber photometry paired with calcium imaging (Aharoni and Hoogland, 2019). With genetically targeted activity markers such as GCaMP, RCaMP, and the like it is possible to observe sensory responses, circuit activity, and network dynamics in an area of interest (Figure 3C). These techniques will allow researchers to observe many neurons over multiple behavioral events, for weeks up to months and, therefore, make it possible to gauge the effects of neuromodulation on circuit function over time.
Conclusion
Tremendous progress has been made toward associating the activities of genetically defined populations of neurons in distinct brain regions with specific social behaviors. Emerging from this collective work is a complex image of brain circuits in which the structural and molecular heterogeneity of neurons is not an experimental problem to overcome, but rather, a feature that provides precise access to unlock the underlying logic of individual social behaviors. Genetic approaches often leverage neuroanatomical, behavioral, and functional approaches for a comprehensive and multifaceted description of brain circuits and provide unprecedented predictive power over the behavioral consequences of neural activity. At the same time, it is important to appreciate the experimental conditions that produce our understanding of these circuit functions. For example, the same genetically defined neuron population can drive or suppress aggression when activated with different temporal dynamics (Lee et al., 2014; Baleisyte et al., 2021), demonstrating that the dynamics of activation patterns can profoundly shape behavioral outcomes. As endogenous patterns of neural activity are revealed by techniques such as single cell in vivo fluorescent imaging, progress on optogenetics suggests single cell functional manipulations may eventually become feasible (Papagiakoumou et al., 2009, 2020). To this point, however, the temporal profiles used to experimentally manipulate social circuits typically have not replicated the endogenous activity patterns. Thus, while the causal relationships between the activation of a specific neuron population and the resulting behavior are undeniable, testing the impact of endogenously realistic patterns of activity on behavioral output remains challenging.
Genetic approaches allow reproducible access to a precisely defined population of neurons (Choi et al., 2005; Wu et al., 2014), and experimental control over the activity of these neurons (Boyden et al., 2005; Armbruster et al., 2007). However, social circuits display profound integration on multiple spatial and temporal scales. For example, significant progress has been made toward identifying the molecular and structural organization of circuits responsible for individual social behaviors, and toward identifying the neuromodulatory nodes that influence these behaviors. However, in most cases it remains unclear how neuromodulatory input remaps the probabilistic relationships between sensory input and the behaviors they promote. Do the same neurons mediate social behaviors regardless of interoceptive states? Is the output or electrophysiological activity of a behavioral circuit suppressed or enhanced by a particular neuromodulator? We are just now starting to understand how fluctuations in neuromodulatory state alter circuit dynamics, and the resulting behaviors, on a moment-to-moment basis (Falkner et al., 2014; Tang et al., 2020). Moreover, the effects of neuromodulation depend on how social circuits are organized during development, and therefore the effects of neuromodulation often differ between individuals based on factors such as age, sex or experience (McCarthy et al., 2012; de Vries et al., 2014). Understanding individual differences in the organization of social behaviors is a particularly important goal.
The profound integration occurring at social circuits in the brain (e.g., Dwyer et al., 2022), trumpets the interdependent nature of these critically important behaviors. Thus, the probability of a specific social behavior depends on the identity of both social partners and interoceptive states, such as hunger, that require a shift in the landscape of potential social behaviors (Padilla et al., 2016). As such, a behavioral hierarchy emerges in which hunger suppresses social interaction and sensitivity to pain, while social interactions are suppressed by hunger but suppress an animal’s sensitivity to pain. The relationships between different behavioral states are reflected in the organization of the underlying circuits and, in some cases, the organization of social circuits can inform our understanding of behavior (Mason, 2001; Padilla et al., 2016). While we have discussed this primarily in the context of social behavior, it is our belief that profound integration is a feature of many brain circuits and progress toward understanding the native function beyond social circuits will often require establishing the relationships between different behaviors.
In many cases, the tools required to investigate the connections between distinct behavioral circuits are already available. Viral anatomical tracing methods provide ways to identify the brain-wide afferent (Wickersham et al., 2007; Menegas et al., 2015; Dwyer et al., 2022), and efferent (Feinberg et al., 2008; Wu et al., 2009; Ishii et al., 2017) synaptic partners to a genetically and anatomically defined population. Intersectional genetic approaches allow simultaneous investigation of multiple genetically defined cell populations (Austin et al., 2004; Knobloch et al., 2012; Ishii et al., 2017; Carcea et al., 2021). At the same time, the ability to monitor the activities of many, well-defined, neurons continues to accelerate (Lee et al., 2014; Li et al., 2017; Menegas et al., 2018). If recent progress characterizing the basis for individual social behaviors at the level of genetically defined neural circuits serves as a valid benchmark, the coming years will provide remarkable insights into how distinct behavioral circuits integrate information from disparate circuits.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
SD, DK, SP, and JB conceived of the topic, wrote the manuscript, and edited the manuscript together. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (Grant R01-MH-115094; JB), and a gift from H. Britton Sanderford Jr (JB).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AharoniD.HooglandT. M. (2019). Circuit investigations with open-source miniaturized microscopes: past, present and future.Front. Cell Neurosci.13:141. 10.3389/fncel.2019.00141
2
AlexanderG. M.RoganS. C.AbbasA. I.ArmbrusterB. N.PeiY.AllenJ. A. (2010). Remote control of neuronal activity in transgenic mice expressing evolved G protein-coupled receptors.Neuron6327–39. 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.014
3
AlhadeffA. L.SuZ.HernandezE.KlimaM. L.PhillipsS. Z.HollandR. A.GuoC. (2018). A neural circuit for the suppression of pain by a competing need state.Cell173140.e115–152.e115. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.057
4
AlvarengaT. A.AndersenM. L.PapaleL. A.AntunesI. B.TufikS. (2005). Influence of long-term food restriction on sleep pattern in male rats.Brain Res.105749–56. 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.07.024
5
AponteY.AtasoyD.SternsonS. M. (2011). AGRP neurons are sufficient to orchestrate feeding behavior rapidly and without training.Nat. Neurosci.14351–355. 10.1038/nn.2739
6
ArmbrusterB. A.LiX.PauschM. H.HerlitzeS.RothB. L. (2007). Evolving the lock to fit the key to create a family of G protein-coupled receptors potently activated by an inert ligand.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1045163–5168. 10.1073/pnas.0700293104
7
AustinC. P.BatteyJ. F.BradleyA.BucaM.CapecchiM.CollinsF. S. (2004). The knockout mouse project.Nat. Genet.36921–924. 10.1038/ng0904-921
8
BaleisyteA.SchneggenburgerR.KochubeyO. (2021). Optogenetic stimulation of medial amygdala GABA neurons with kinetically different channelrhodopsin variant yield opposite behavioral outcomes.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1101/2021.06.30.450543
9
BasbaumA. I.FieldsH. L. (1978). Endogenous pain control mechanisms, review and hypothesis.Ann. Neurol.4451–46210.1002/ana.410040511
10
BasbaumA. I.ClantonC. H.FieldsH. L. (1978). Three bulbospinal pathways from the rostral medulla of the cat, an autoradiographic study of pain modulating systems.J. Comp. Neurol.178209–22410.1002/cne.901780203
11
BaylessD. W.ShahN. M. (2016). Genetic dissection of neural circuits underlying sexually dimorphic social behaviours.Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.371:1688. 10.1098/rstb.2015.0109
12
BerganJ. F.Ben-ShaulY.DulacC. (2014). Sex-specific processing of social cues in the medial amygdala.Elife3:e02743. 10.7554/eLife.02743
13
BertholdA. A. (1848). Transplantation der Hoden.Arch. Anat. Physiol. Wiss. Med.1642–46
14
BetleyJ. N. S.XuZ.CaoR.GongC. J.MagnusY.YuZ. (2015). Neurons for hunger and thirst transmit a negative-valence teaching signal.Nature521180–185. 10.1038/nature14416
15
BetleyJ. N.CaoZ. F.RitolaK. D.SternsonS. M. (2013). Parallel, redundant circuit organization for homeostatic control of feeding behavior.Cell1551337–1350. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.002S0092-8674(13)01414-1
16
BillingA.CorreiaM. H.KellyD. A.LiG. L.BerganJ. F. (2020). Synaptic connections of aromatase circuits in the medial amygdala are sex specific.Eneuro7:ENEURO.0489-19.202010.1523/ENEURO.0489-19.2020
17
BoydenE. S.ZhangF.BambergE.NagelG.DeisserothK. (2005). Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity.Nat. Neurosci.81263–126810.1038/nn1525
18
BrobergerC.JohansenJ.JohanssonC.SchallingM.HokfeltT. (1998). The neuropeptide Y/agouti gene-related protein (AGRP) brain circuitry in normal, anorectic, and monosodium glutamate-treated mice.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.9515043–15048. 10.1073/pnas.95.25.15043
19
BurnettC. J.FunderburkS. C.NavarreteJ.SabolA.Liang-GuallpaJ.DesrochersT. M.KrashesM. J. (2019). Need-based prioritization of behavior.Elife8:e44527. 10.7554/eLife.44527
20
BurnettC. J.LiC.WebberE.TsaousidouE.XueS. Y.BrüningJ. C.KrashesM. J. (2016). Hunger-driven motivational state competition.Neuron92187–201. 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.08.032
21
ButlerJ. M.MaruskaK. P. (2015). The mechanosesory lateral line is used to assess opponents and mediate aggressive behaviors during territorial interactions in an African cichlid fish.J. Exp. Biol.2183284–3294. 10.1242/jeb.125948
22
CampbellJ. N.MacoskoE. Z.FenselauH.PersT. H.LyubetskayaA.TenenD. (2017). A molecular census of arcuate hypothalamus and median eminence cell types.Nat. Neurosci.20484–496. 10.1038/nn.4495
23
CampbellR. E.HerbisonA. E. (2014). Gonadal steroid neuromodulation of developing and mature hypothalamic neuronal networks.Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.2996–102. 10.1016/j.conb.2014.06.003
24
CarceaI.CaraballoN. L.MarlinB. J.OoyamaR.RicebergJ. S.NavarroJ. M. M. (2021). Oxytocin neurons enable social transmission of maternal behavior.Nature596553–557. 10.1038/s41586-021-03814-7
25
ChenP. B.HuR. K.WuY. E.PanL.HuangS.MicevychP. E.HongW. (2019). Sexually dimorphic control of parenting behavior by the medial amygdala.Cell1761206–1221. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.024
26
ChenQ. H.ToneyG. M. (2010). In vivo discharge properties of hypothalamus paraventricular nucleus neurons with axonal projections to the rostral ventrolateral medulla.J. Neurophysiol.1034–15. 10.1152/jn.00094.2009
27
ChoiG. B.DongH. W.MurphyA. J.ValenzuelaD. M.YancopoulosG. D.SwansonL. W.AndersonD. J. (2005). Lhx6 delineates a pathway mediating innate reproductive behaviors from the amygdala to the hypothalamus.Neuron46647–660. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.011
28
CohenJ. Y.HaeslerS.VongL.LowellB. B.UchidaN. (2012). Neuron-type-specific signals for reward and punishment in the ventral tegmental area.Nature48285–88. 10.1038/nature10754
29
CookeB. M.WoolleyC. (2005). Sexually dimorphic synaptic organization of the medial amygdala.J. Neurosci.2510759–10767. 10.1523/jneurosci.2919-05.2005
30
CornilC. A.GregoryF. B.JacquesB. (2018). Differential control of appetitive and consummatory sexual behavior by neuroestrogens in male quail.Horm. Behav.10415–31. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.02.006
31
CornilC. A.MélanieT.MichelleB.GregoryF. B.JacquesB. (2006). Rapid effects of aromatase inhibition on male reproductive behaviors in Japanese quail.Horm. Behav.4945–67. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.05.003
32
CorreaS. M.NewstromD. W.WarneJ. P.FlandinP.CheungC. C.Lin-MooreA. T.PierceA. A. (2015). An estrogen-responsive module in the ventromedial hypothalamus selectively drives sex-specific activity in females.Cell Rep.1062–74. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.011
33
DarwinC. (1872). The Expression Of The Emotions In Man And Animals.London: John Murray.
34
de VriesG. J.FieldsC. T.PetersN. V.WhylingsJ.PaulM. J. (2014). Sensitive periods for hormonal programming of the brain.Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci.1679–108. 10.1007/7854_2014_286
35
DeySChameroPPruJ. K.ChienM. S.Ibarra-SoriaX.SpencerK. R.LoganD. W. (2015). Cyclic regulation of sensory perception by a female hormone alters behavior.Cell1611334–1344. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.052
36
DietrichM. O.ZimmerM. R.BoberJ.HorvathT. L. (2015). Hypothalamic Agrp neurons drive stereotypic behaviors beyond feeding.Cell1601222–1232. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.024
37
DongH. W.SwansonL. W. (2004). Projections from the bed nuclei of the stria terminalis, posterior division, implications for cerebral hemisphere regulation of defensive and reproductive behaviors.J. Comp. Neurol.471396–433. 10.1002/cne.20002
38
DulacC.AxelR. (1995). A novel family of genes encoding putative pheromone receptors in mammals.Cell83195–206. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90161-2
39
DwyerJ.KellyD. A.BerganJ. (2022). Brain-wide synaptic inputs to aromatase-expressing neurons in the medial amygdala suggest complex circuitry for modulating social behavior. eNeuro9:ENEURO.0329–21.2021. 10.1523/ENEURO.0329-21.2021
40
FalknerA. L.DollarP.PeronaP.AndersonD. J.LinD. (2014). Decoding ventromedial hypothalamic neural activity during male mouse aggression.J. Neurosci.345971–5984. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5109-13.2014
41
FeinbergE. H.VanHovenM. K.BendeskyA.WangG.FetterR. D.ShenK.BargmannC. I. (2008). GFP reconstitution across synaptic partners (GRASP) defines cell contacts and synapses in living nervous systems.Neuron57353–363. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.11.030
42
FergusonJ. N.AldagJ.M.InselT. R.YoungL. J. (2001). Oxytocin in the medial amygdala is essential for social recognition in the mouse.J. Neurosci.218278–8285. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-20-08278.2001
43
GaurA.PaiG. K.AnanthanarayananP. H.PalP. (2014). Role of Ventromedial hypothalamus in high fat induce obesity in male rate, association with lipid profile, thyroid profile and insulin resistance.Ann. Neurosci.21104–107. 10.5214/ans.0972.7531.210306
44
GoldsteinN.LevineB. J.LoyK. A.DukeW. L.MeyersonO. S.JamnikA. A.CarterM. E. (2018). Hypothalamic neurons that regulate feeding can influence sleep/wake states based on homeostatic need.Curr. Biol.283736–3747. 10.1016/j.cub.2018.09.055
45
GoodsonJ. L.KabelikD. (2009). Dynamic limbic networks and social social diversity in vertebrates, From neural context to neuromodulatory patterning.Front. Neuroendocrinol.30429–441. 10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.05.007
46
HarrisonM. J. S. (1983). Territorial behaviour in the green monkey, cercopithecus sabaeus, seasons defense of local food supplies.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.1285–94. 10.1007/bf00296937
47
HashikawaK.HashikawaY.TremblayR.ZhangJ.FengJ. F.SabolA.PiperW. T.LeeH.RudyB.LinD. (2018). Esr1+ cells in the ventromedial hypothalamus control female aggression.Nat. Neurosci.201580–1590. 10.1038/nn.4644
48
HeimovicsS. A.BrianC. T.KiranK. S. (2015). Rapid effects of estradiol on aggression in birds and mice, the fast and the furious.Integr. Comp. Biol.55281–293. 10.1093/icb/icv048
49
HongW.KimD. W.AndersonD. J. (2015). Antagonistic control of social behaviors by inhibitory and excitatory neurons in the medial amygdala.Cell1581348–1361. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.049
50
HrvatinS.HochbaumD. R.NagyM. A.CicconetM.RobertsonK.CheadleL. (2017). Single-Cell analysis of experience-dependent transcriptomic states in mouse visual cortex.Nat. Neurosci.21120–129. 10.1038/s41593-017-0029-5
51
HubbardD. T.BlanchardD. C.YangM.MarkhamC. M.GervacioA.Chun-IL.BlanchardR. J. (2004). Development of defensive behavior and conditioning to cat odor in the rat.Physiol. Behav.80525–530. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2003.10.006
52
IshiiK. K.OsakadaT.MoriH.MiyasakaN.YoshiharaY.MiyamichiK.TouharaK. (2017). A labeled-line neural circuit for pheromone-mediated sexual behaviors in mice.Neuron95123–137. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.05.038
53
IwasaT.MatsuzakiT.YanoK.MayilaY.YanagiharaR.YamamotoY.KuwaharaA. (2018). Effects of low energy availability on reproductive functions and their underlying neuroendocrine mechanisms.J. Clin. Med.7:166. 10.3390/jcm7070166
54
JikomesN.RameshR. N.Mandelblat-CerfY.AndermannM. L. (2016). Preemptive Stimulation of AgRP neurons in fed mice enables conditioned food seeking under threat.Curr. Biol.262500–2507. 10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.019
55
KamitakiN.UsherC. L.McCarrollS. A. (2018). Using droplet digital PCR to analyze allele-specific RNA expression.Methods Mol. Biol.1768401–422. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7778-9_23
56
KammelL. G.CorreaS. M. (2020). Selective sexual differentiation of neuron populations may contribute to sex-specific outputs of the ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus.J. Neuroendocrinol.32:e12801. 10.1111/jne.12801
57
KatzP. S.EiggM. H.Harris-WarrickR. M. (1989). Serotonergic/cholinergic muscle receptor cells in the crab stomatogastric nervous system. I. Identification and characterization of the gastropyloric receptor cells.J. Neurophys.62558–570. 10.1152/jn.1989.62.2.558
58
KatzP.GrillnerS.WilsonR.BorstA.GreenspanR.BuzsákiG.MartinK.MarderE.KristanW. (2013). Vertebrate versus invertebrate neural circuits.Curr. Biol.23R504–R506. 10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.039
59
KellyD. A.VarnumM. M.KrentzelA. A.KrugS.ForgerN. G. (2013). Differential control of sex differences in estrogen receptor α in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and anteroventral periventricular nucleus.Endocrinology1543836–3846. 10.1210/en.2013-1239
60
KembleE. D.BlanchardD. C.BlanchardR. J.TakushiR. (1984). Taming in wild rats following medial amygdaloid lesions.Physiol. Behav.32131–134. 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90084-2
61
KenakinT. (2004). Principles, receptor theory in pharmacology.Trends Pharmacol. Sci.25186–192. 10.1016/j.tips.2004.02.012
62
KeshavarziS.PowerJ. M.AlbersE. H. H.SullivanR. K. S.SahP. (2015). Dendritic organization of olfactory inputs to medial amygdala neurons.J. Neurosci.3513020–13028. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0627-15.2015
63
KeshavarziS.SullivanR. K.IannoD. J.SahP. (2014). Functional properties and projections of neurons in the medial amygdala.J. Neurosci.348699–8715. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1176-14.2014
64
KimT. H.ZhangY.LecoqJ.JungJ. C.LiJ.ZengH.NiellC. M.SchnitzerM. J. (2016).Long-Term optical access to an estimated one million neurons in the live mouse cortex.Cell Rep.173385–3394. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.004
65
KishiT.AschkenasiC. J.LeeC. E.MountjoyK. G.SaperC. B.ElmquistJ. K. (2003). Expression of melanocortin 4 receptor mRNA in the central nervous system of the rat.J. Comp. Neurol.457213–235. 10.1002/cne.10454
66
KnoblochH. S.CharletA.HoffmanL. C.EliavaM.KhrulevS.CetinA. H. (2012). Evoked axonal oxytocin release in the central amygdala attenuates fear response.Neuron73553–566. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.030
67
KohlJ.BabayanB. M.RubinsteinN. D.AutryA. E.Marin-RodriguezB.KapoorV. (2018). Functional circuit architecture underlying parental behaviour.Nature556326–331. 10.1038/s41586-018-0027-0
68
Kollack-WalkerS.NewmanS. W. (1995). Mating and agonistic behavior produce different patterns of Fos immunolabeling in the male Syrian hamster brain.Neuroscience66721–736. 10.1016/0306-4522(94)00563-k
69
KonishiM. (1985). Birdsong, from behavior to neuron.Annu. Rev. Neurosci.8125–170. 10.1146/annurev.ne.08.030185.001013
70
KrashesM. J.KodaS.YeC.RoganS. C.AdamsA. C.CusherD. S. (2011). Rapid, reversible activation of AgRP neurons drives feeding behavior in mice.J. Clin. Invest.1211424–1428. 10.1172/JCI46229
71
KravitzE. A. (2000). Serotonin and aggression, insights gained from a lobster model system and speculations on the role of amine neurons in a complex behavior.J. Comp. Physiol. A186221–238. 10.1007/s003590050423
72
KrebsJ. R. (1980). Optimal foraging, predation risk and territory defense.Ardea6883–90. 10.1098/rspb.2001.1637
73
KrukM. R.Van der PoelA. M.MeelisW.HermansJ.MostertP. G.MosJ. (1983). Discriminant analysis of the localization of aggression-inducing electrode placements in the hypothalamus of male rats.Brain Res.26061–79. 10.1016/0006-8993(83)90764-3
74
LammersJ. H. C. M.KrukM. R.MeelisW.van der PoelA. M. (1988). Hypothalamic substrates for brain stimulation-induced attack, teeth-chattering and social grooming in the rat.Brain Res.449311–327. 10.1016/0006-8993(88)91046-3
75
LeeH.KimD. W.RemediosR.AnthonyT. E.ChangA.MadisenL.ZengH.AndersonD. J. (2014). Scalable control of mounting and attack by Esr1+ neurons in the ventromedial hypothalamus.Nature509627–632. 10.1038/nature13169
76
LehmanM. N.WinansS. S.PowersJ. B. (1980). Medial nucleus of the amygdala mediates chemosensory control of male hamster sexual behavior.Science210557–560. 10.1126/science.7423209
77
LeibelR. L. (1990). Is obesity due to a heritable difference in ‘set point’ for adiposity?West J. Med.153429–431.
78
LeungC. G.MasonP. (1999). Physiological properties of raphe magnus neurons during sleep and waking.J. Neurophysiol.81584–595. 10.1152/jn.1999.81.2.584
79
LiY.MathisA.GreweB. F.OsterhoutJ. A.AhanonuB.SchnitzerM. J.MurthyV. N.DulacC. (2017). Neuronal representation of social information in the medial amygdala of awake behaving mice.Cell1711176–1190. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.015
80
LimaS. Q.HromadkaT.ZnamenskiyP.ZadorA. M. (2009). PINP, a new method of tagging neuronal populations for identification during in vivo electrophysiological recording.PLoS One4:E6099. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006099
81
LinD.BoyleM. P.DollarP.LeeH.PeronaP.LeinE. S.AndersonD. J. (2011). Functional identification of an aggression locus in the mouse hypothalamus.Nature470221–226. 10.1038/nature09736
82
LiuH.KishiT.RoseberryA. G.CaiX.LeeC. E.MontezJ. M.FriedmanJ. M.ElmquistJ. K. (2003). Transgenic mice expressing green fluorescent protein under the control of the melanocortin-4 receptor promoter.J. Neurosci.237143–7154. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-18-07143.2003
83
LordL. D.JuliaB.RichmondR. T. (2009). Rapid steroid influences on visually guided sexual behavior in male goldfish.Horm. Behav.56519–52610.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.09.002
84
LorenzK. (1966). On Aggression.London: Methuen.
85
LuoM.FeeM. S.KatzL. C. (2003). Encoding pheromonal signals in the accessory olfactory bulb of behaving mice.Science2991196–120110.1126/science.1082133
86
LuquetS.PerezF. A.HnaskoT. S.PalmiterR. D. (2005). NPY/AgRP neurons are essential for feeding in adult mice but can be ablated in neonates. Science310683–685. 10.1126/science.1115524
87
MacoskoE. Z.BasuA.SatijaR.NemeshJ.ShekharK.GoldmanM.TiroshI.BialasA. R. (2015). Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets.Cell1611202–1214. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002
88
MandiyanV. S.CoatsJ. K.ShahN. M. (2005). Deficits in sexual and aggressive behaviors in Cnga2 mutant mice.Nat. Neurosci.81660–1662. 10.1038/nn1589
89
MarderE. (2012). Neuromodulation of neuronal circuits, back to the future.Neuron761–1110.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.010
90
MarderE.BucherD. (2001). Central pattern generators and the control of rhythmic movements.Curr. Biol.11R986–R99610.1016/s0960-9822(01)00581-4
91
MargolisE. B.LockH.HjelmstadG. O.FieldsH. L. (2006). The ventral tegmental area revisited, is there an electrophysiological marker for dopaminergic neurons?J. Physiol.577907–924. 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.117069
92
MasonP. (2001). Contributions of the medullary raphe and ventromedial reticular region to pain modulation and other homeostatic functions.Annu. Rev. Neurosci.24737–777. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.737
93
MasonP.FieldsH. L. (1989). Axonal trajectories and terminations of on- and off- cells in the cat lower brainstem.J. Comp. Neurol.288185–207. 10.1002/cne.902880202
94
McCarthyE. A.MaqsudluA.BassM.GeorghiouS.CherryJ. A.BaumM. J. (2017). DREADD-induced silencing of the medial amygdala reduced the preference for male pheromones and the expression of lordosis in estrous female mice.Eur. J. Neurosci.462035–2046. 10.1111/ejn.13636
95
McCarthyM.ArnoldA. P.BallG. F.BlausteinJ. C.De VriesG. J. (2012). Sex differences in the brain, the not so inconvenient truth.J. Neurosci.322241–2247. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5372-11.2012
96
MenegasW.AkitiK.AmoR.UchidaN.Watabe-UchidaM. (2018). Dopamine neurons projecting to the posterior striatum reinforce avoidance of threatening stimuli.Nat. Neurosci.211421–1430. 10.1038/s41593-018-0222-1
97
MenegasW.BerganJ. F.OgawaS. K.IsogaiY.VenkatarajuK. U.OstenP.UchidaN. (2015). Dopamine neurons projecting to the posterior striatum form an antomically distinct subclass.Elife4:e10032. 10.7554/eLife.10032
98
MillerS. M.MarcotulliD.ShenA.ZweifelL. S. (2019). Divergent medial amygdala projections regulate approach-avoidance conflict behavior.Nat. Neurosci.22565–575. 10.1038/s41593-019-0337-z
99
Mohedano-MarianoA.Pro-SistiagaP.UbedaBanonI.CrespoC.InsaustiR.Martinez-MarcosA. (2007). Segregated pathways to the vomeronasal amygdala, differential projections from the anterior and posterior divisions of the accessory olfactory bulb.Eur. J. Neurosci.252065–2080. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05472.x
100
MorrisJ. A.JordanC. LKingZ. A.NorthcuttK. V.BreedloveM. S. (2007). Sexual dimorphism and steroid responsiveness of the posterodorsal medial amygdala in adult mice.Brain Res.1190115–121. 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.11.005
101
MusatovS.ChenW.PfaffD. W.KaplittM. G.OgawaS. (2006). RNAi-mediated silencing of estrogen receptor {alpha} in the ventromedial nucleus of hypothalamus abolishes female sexual behaviors.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10310456–10460. 10.1073/pnas.0603045103
102
MusatovS.ChenW.PfaffD. W.MobbsC. V.YangX. J.CleggD. J.KaplittM. G.OgawaS. (2007). Silencing of estrogen receptor alpha in the ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus leads to metabolic syndrome.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1042501–2506. 10.1073/pnas.0610787104
103
NadimF.BucherD. (2014). Neuromodulation of neurons and synapses.Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.2948–56. 10.1016/j.conb.2014.05.003
104
NakaiJ.OhkuraM.ImotoK. (2001). A high signal-to-noise Ca2+ probe composed of a single green fluorescent protein.Nat. Biotechnol.19137–141. 10.1038/84397
105
NewmanS. W. (1999). The medial extended amygdala in male reproductive behavior, A node in the mammalian social behavior network.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.877242–257. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09271.x
106
OchiaiI.MatsudaK.NishiM.OzawaH.KawataM. (2004). Imaging analysis of subcellular correlation of androgen receptor and estrogen receptor alpha in single living cells using green fluorescent protein color variants.Mol. Endocrinol.1826–42. 10.1210/me.2002-0262
107
OgawaS.ChanJ.ChesterA. E.GustafssonJ. Å.KorachK. S.PfaffD. W. (1999). Survival of reproductive behaviors in estrogen receptor β gene-deficient (βERKO) male and female mice.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.9612887–1289210.1073/pnas.96.22.12887
108
OgawaS.LubahnD. B.KorachK. S.PfaffD. W. (1997). Behavioral effects of estrogen receptor gene disruption in male mice.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.941476–1481. 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1476
109
PadillaS. L.QiuJ.NestorC. C.ZhangC.SmithA. W.WhiddonB. B. (2017). AgRP to Kiss1 neuron signaling links nutritional state and fertility.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1142413–2418. 10.1073/pnas.1621065114
110
PadillaS. L.QiuJ.SodenM. E.SanzE.NestorC. C.BarkerF. D.QuintanaA.ZweifelL. S. (2016). Agouti-related peptide neural circuits mediate adaptive behaviors in the starved state.Nat. Neurosci.19734–741. 10.1038/nn.4274
111
PalmiterR. D.BrinsterR. L.HammerR. E. (1982). Dramatic growth of mice that develop from eggs microinjected with metallothionein-growth hormone fusion genes.Nature300611–615. 10.1038/300611a0
112
PapagiakoumouE.de SarsV.EmilianiV.OronD. (2009). Temporal focusing with spatially modulated excitation.Opt .Express175391–540110.1364/oe.17.005391
113
PapagiakoumouE.RonzittaE.EmilianiV. (2020). Scanless two-photon excitation with temporal focusing.Nat. Methods17571–581. 10.1038/s41592-020-0795-y
114
PerkinsM. N.RothwellN. J.StockM. J.StoneT. W. (1981). Activation of brown adipose tissue thermogenesis by the ventromedial hypothalamus.Nature289401–402. 10.1038/289401a0
115
PetrulisA. (2020). Chapter 2- Structure and function of the medial amygdala.Handb. Behav. Neurosci.2639–61. 10.1016/b978-0-12-815134-1.00002-7
116
PhoenixC. H.GoyR. W.GerallA. A.YoungW. C. (1959). Organizing action of prenatally administered testosterone propionate on the tissues mediating mating behavior in the female guinea pig.Endocrinology65369–382. 10.1210/endo-65-3-369
117
RaamT.HongW. (2021). Organization of neural circuits underlying social behavior, A consideration of the medial amygdala.Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.68124–136. 10.1016/j.conb.2021.02.008
118
Remage-HealeyL. (2014). Frank Beach Award Winner, steroids as neuromodulators of brain circuits and behavior.Horm. Behav.66552–560. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.07.014
119
RemediosR.KennedyA.ZelikowskyM.GreweB. F.SchnitzerM. J.AndersonD. J. (2017). Social behaviour shapes hypothalamic neural ensemble representations of conspecific sex.Nature550388–392. 10.1038/nature23885
120
RosvoldH. E.MirskyA. F.PribramK. H. (1954). Influence of amygdalectomy on social behavior in monkeys.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.47173–178. 10.1037/h0058870
121
RussellD. F. (1979). CNS control of pattern generation in the lobster stomatogastric ganglion.Brain Res.177598–602. 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90480-3
122
RutaV.DattaS. R.VasconcelosM. L.FreelandJ.LoogerL. L.AxelR. (2010). A dimorphic pheromone circuit in Drosophila from sensory input to descending output.Nature468686–690. 10.1038/nature09554
123
ScaliaF.WinansS. S. (1976). The differential projection of the olfactory bulb and accessory olfactory bulb in mammals.J. Comp. Neurol.16131–55. 10.1002/cne.901610105
124
SchultzE. F.TappJ. T. (1973). Olfactory control of behavior in rodents.Psychol. Bull.7921–44. 10.1037/h0033817
125
SelverstonA. I.RussellD. F.MillerJ. P.KingD. G. (1976). The stomatogastric nervous system, Structure and function of a small neural network.Prog. Neurobiol.7215–290. 10.1016/0301-0082(76)90008-3
126
ShughrueP. J.PaulJ. SMerchenthalerI. (1998). Evidence of the colocalization of estrogen receptor-β mRNA and estrogen receptor-α immunoreactivity in neurons of the rat forebrain.Endocrinology1395267–5270. 10.1210/endo.139.12.6525
127
SkinnerK.FieldsH. L.BasbaumA. I.MasonP. (1997). GABA-immunoreactive boutons contact identified OFF and ON cells in the nucleus raphe magnus.J. Comp. Neurol.378196–204. 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19970210)378:2<196::aid-cne4>3.0.co;2-z
128
StowersL.HolyT. E.MeisterM.DulacC.KoentgesG. (2002). Loss of sex discrimination and male-male aggression in mice deficient for TRP2.Science2591493–1500. 10.1126/science.1069259
129
SwansonL. W.PetrovichG. D. (1998). What is the amygdala?Trends Neurosci.21323–331. 10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01265-x
130
TakahashiL. K.GladstoneC. D. (1988). Medial amygdaloid lesions and the regulatin of sociosexual behavioral patterns across the estrous cycle in female golden hamsters.Behav. Neurosci.102268–275. 10.1037//0735-7044.102.2.268
131
TangY.BenusiglioD.LefevreA.HilfigerL.AlthammerF.BludauA. (2020). Social touch promotes interfemale communication via activation of parvocellular oxytocin neurons.Nat. Neurosci.231125–1137. 10.1038/s41593-020-0674-y
132
TaxierL. R.KellieS. G.KarynM. F. (2020). Oestradiol as a neuromodulator of learning and memory.Nat. Rev. Neurosci.21535–550. 10.1038/s41583-020-0362-7
133
TaziauxM.KellerM.BakkerJ.BalthazartJ. (2007). Sexual behavior activity tracks rapid changes in brain estrogen concentrations.J. Neurosci.276563–6572. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1797-07.2007
134
ThomasR. K.CapecchiM. R. (1987). Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells.Cell51503–512. 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90646-5
135
TinbergenN. (1951). The Study Of Instinct.New York, NY: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
136
TinbergenN. (1953). Social Behaviour in Animals, With Special Reference to Vertebrates. Methuen & Co. (Reprinted 2014), London: Psychology Press.
137
UngerE. K.BurkeK. J.YangC. F.BenderK. J.FullerP. M.ShahN. M. (2015). Medial amygdalar aromatase neurons regulate aggression in both sexes.Cell Rep.10453–462. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.040
138
VeeningJ. G.CoolenL. M.de JongT. R.JoostenH. W.de BoerS. F.KoolhaasJ. M.OlivierB. (2005). Do similar neural systems subserve aggressive and sexual behaviour in male rats? Insights from c-Fos and pharmacological studies.Eur. J. Phamacol.536226–239. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.09.041
139
WahisJ.BaudonA.AlthammerF.KerspernD.GoyonS.HagiwaraD.LefevreA. (2021). Astrocytes mediate the effect of oxytocin in the central amygdala on neuronal activity and affective states in rodents.Nat. Neurosci.24529–541. 10.1038/s41593-021-00800-0
140
WickershamI. R.FinkeS.ConzelmannK. K.CallawayE. M. (2007). Retrograde neuronal tracing with a deletion-mutant rabies virus.Nat. Methods447–49. 10.1038/nmeth999
141
WuM. V.ManoliD. S.FraserE. J.CoatsJ. K.TollkuhnJ.HondaS.HaradaN.ShahN. M. (2009). Estrogen masculinizes neural pathways and sex-specific behaviors.Cell13961–72. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.036
142
WuY. E.DangJ.KingsburyL.ZhangM.SunF.HuR. K.HongW. (2021). Neural control of affiliative touch in prosocial interaction.Nature599262–267. 10.1038/s41586-021-03962-w
143
WuY. E.PanL.ZuoY.LiX.HongW. (2017). Detecting activated cell populations using single-cell RNA-Seq. Neuron96, 313–329.e6. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.09.026
144
WuZ.AutryA. E.BerganJ. F.Watabe-UchidaM.DulacC. G. (2014). Galanin neurons in the medial preoptic area govern parental behaviour.Nature509325–330. 10.1038/nature13307
145
XiaG.HanY.MengF.HeY.SrisaiD.FariasM. (2021). Reciprocal control of obesity and anxiety-depressive disorder via a GABA and serotonin neural circuit.Mol. Psychiatry262837–2853. 10.1038/s41380-021-01053-w
146
XuY.NedungadiT. P.ZhuL.SobhaniN.IraniB. G.DavisK. E. (2011). Distinct hypothalamic neurons medial estrogenic effects of energy homeostasis and reproduction.Cell Metab.14453–465. 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.08.009
147
YangT.YangC. F.ChizariM. D.MaheswaranathanN.BurkeK. J.BoriusM.InoueS.BenderK. J.GanguliS.ShahN. M. (2017). Social control of hypothalamus-mediated male aggression.Neuron95955–970. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.046
148
YaoS.BerganJ.LanjuinA.DulacC. (2017). Oxytocin signaling in the medial amygdala is required for sex discrimination of social cues.ELife6:e31373. 10.7554/eLife.31373
149
ZemelmanB. V.LeeG. A.NgM.MiesenböckG. (2002). Selective photostimulation of genetically chARGed neurons.Neuron3315–22. 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00574-8
Summary
Keywords
social behavior, circuit, neuromodulation, sensory input, behavior, integration
Citation
Dickinson SY, Kelly DA, Padilla SL and Bergan JF (2022) From Reductionism Toward Integration: Understanding How Social Behavior Emerges From Integrated Circuits. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 16:862437. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2022.862437
Received
25 January 2022
Accepted
07 March 2022
Published
01 April 2022
Volume
16 - 2022
Edited by
Zi-Wei Liu, Hunan Normal University, China
Reviewed by
Elliott Albers, Georgia State University, United States; Matt Carter, Williams College, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Dickinson, Kelly, Padilla and Bergan.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Joseph F. Bergan, jbergan@umass.edu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.