ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Audiol. Otol.
Sec. Clinical Research in Auditory Implants and Hearing Aids
Volume 3 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fauot.2025.1648716
The importance of frequency-place mismatch in the quality of sound perceived in single sided deafness Cochlear implant recipients
Provisionally accepted- 1Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege, Liège, Belgium
- 2MED-EL Elektromedizinische Gerate GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Single-sided deafness (SSD) affects the ability to localize sounds and to understand speech in noisy environments, significantly impacting the quality of life. Cochlear implants (CIs) have been explored as a solution for SSD, with varying success attributed to various factors like onset of deafness (pre vs. postlingual), duration of especially prelingual deafness, compliance to rehab protocols but also to the frequency-to-place mismatch, where the frequency assigned to CI electrodes does not align with the cochlea's natural tonotopy. The Objective is to investigate the influence of frequency-to-place mismatch on hearing performance, sound quality, and patient satisfaction in SSD CI recipients by comparing default and anatomical frequency mapping.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 19 SSD patients implanted with MEDEL CIs between 2014-2023. Post-activation, high-resolution cone beam CT scans were analyzed using OTOPLAN® (Version V4) to define anatomical frequency mapping. The average frequency mismatch (AFM) between default and anatomical mapping was calculated. Speech intelligibility was assessed using articulation function (AF) scores, and sound quality was evaluated through patient questionnaires.Results: A significant negative correlation between AFM and AF (R = -0.47; p = 0.042) was observed. Sound quality aspects, including natural sound perception and similarity to the normal ear, inversely correlated with AFM (R² = 0.281; p = 0.05 and R² = 0.301; p = 0.043, respectively). Global satisfaction scores were high (3.58 ± 0.77), unaffected by AFM.Frequency-to-place mismatch impacts speech intelligibility and sound quality in SSD CI patients. Anatomical frequency mapping using tools like OTOPLAN® can enhance CI outcomes, highlighting the need for individualized cochlear measurements and electrode assignment.
Keywords: cochlear implant, Hearing quality, Frequency allocation, Cochlear length, OTOPLAN®
Received: 17 Jun 2025; Accepted: 21 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Gersdorff, Ivanovic, Zoka Assadi, Nopp, Camby and Lefèbvre. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Philippe Lefèbvre, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege, Liège, Belgium
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.