Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Audiol. Otol.

Sec. Clinical Research in Auditory Implants and Hearing Aids

Volume 3 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fauot.2025.1677161

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Technologies for Fitting Bone Conduction Hearing DevicesView all articles

Evaluation of a Percutaneous Bone Conduction System Using the Ponto BHX implant in a Pediatric Population with Congenital Conductive Hearing Loss – a 1 year Prospective Follow-up Study

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Division of ENT diseases, Department of Clinical Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 2Medical Unit Ear, Nose, Throat and Hearing, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 3Oticon Medical (Sweden), Askim, Sweden

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Bone conduction hearing systems is a well-established treatment for patients with conductive or mixed hearing losses, such as conductive hearing loss caused by congenital aural atresia. Percutaneous bone conduction systems consist of a titanium fixture implanted in a temporal bone and a skin penetrating abutment connecting to an external sound processor. Implant design and surgical techniques have developed over time and while one-stage minimally invasive procedures have long been the standard in adult patients, the development has been more cautious in pediatric patients as they have been more prone to complications and implant loss. The purpose of this study was to collect systematic data from a pediatric population receiving a percutaneous bone conduction hearing device, the laser ablated Ponto BHX implant, in a one-stage surgical procedure. Methods: Prospective, one-armed, observational cohort study of children undergoing surgery for a percutaneous bone conduction device with a laser ablated fixture. Outcomes were assessed at screening, during surgery, 7-10 days after surgery, 6-14 weeks after surgery, and 12 months after surgery. The primary outcome was implant stability over 12 months. Furthermore, implant survival, skin reactions, and audiological performance were evaluated, and implant survival was compared to a retrospective control cohort. Results: Fifteen study participants with a mean age of 6 years (range 3-12 years) were included. Three were bilaterally implanted , rendering a total of 18 implants. Implant stability showed a 10-point increase in mean implant stability measurements at 12 months, compared to at surgery. Four implants (22%) were lost before the 12-month follow-up, which was comparable to the retrospective cohort where the 12-month implant loss rate was 23%. Across the 12-month period, 8/18 implant sites had a maximum Holgers score of 0, indicating no skin reactions. The remaining implant sites had a maximum Holgers score of 1-3. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study shows safe and reliable outcomes using laser ablated fixtures for one stage surgery in a pediatric population. Public trial registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03723161).

Keywords: Bone conduction implant, percutaneous bone anchored hearing system, Conductive hearing loss, Aural atresia, one-stage BCD surgery, Audiology, Pediatrics

Received: 31 Jul 2025; Accepted: 03 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Josefsson Dahlgren, Iversen, Hultcrantz and Engmér Berglin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Hanna Josefsson Dahlgren, hanna.josefsson@ki.se

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.