Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

COMMUNITY CASE STUDY article

Front. Environ. Health

Sec. Environmental Epidemiology

This article is part of the Research TopicIntervention and Implementation for Environmental Health SciencesView all 4 articles

M-O-M-S on the Bayou: Implementation of an intervention to improve mental health after disaster

Provisionally accepted
Emily  W HarvilleEmily W Harville1*Gloria  GiarratanoGloria Giarratano2Michelle  PattersonMichelle Patterson3Mary  SchultheisMary Schultheis4Kirsten  S DoransKirsten S Dorans1Sarah  TurnerSarah Turner1Simone  HarrisSimone Harris1Sherri  LongoSherri Longo5Karen  WeisKaren Weis6
  • 1Tulane University, New Orleans, United States
  • 2Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, United States
  • 3Nicholls State University, Thibodaux, United States
  • 4Crescent City Family Services, Gretna, United States
  • 5Ochsner Health, New Orleans, United States
  • 6Kansas University Medical Center, Salina, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Pregnant women are a vulnerable population after disaster. Their health may be improved through community-based support programs in addition to their standard prenatal care. We conducted a prenatal peer support program, Mentors Offering Maternal Support (M-OM-S), focused on improving mental health in hurricane-affected areas in southern Louisiana. M-O-M-S consists of six biweekly sessions covering pregnancy acceptance, maternal role identification, family and partner relationships, preparation for labor/fears around labor, well-being/safety of self and baby, and post-delivery health and maternal-infant bonding. The program is led by a "mentor", an experienced mother but not necessarily a clinician or social worker, who guides the group in discussing the topic for the day. Starting in 2023, we implemented the M-O-M-S program in the Bayou and River Parishes regions, the two largely rural regions of the state that had been hardest hit by the most recent major hurricane in the area, Ida. Changes made to the program included offering it online and incorporating a session on disaster preparedness and response. Despite a perceived need for the program from community members and clinicians, recruitment and enrollment were substantially below targets. Most participants were either Black (50.9%) or White (39.6%), and a majority reported at least two serious experiences of a hurricane. Mean baseline score on the Edinburgh Depression Scale was 13.2, above levels of concern, and mean baseline score on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) was in the "mild anxiety" range. Those who completed the pre-and post-assessments had an average positive change on the depression, anxiety, and pregnancy-related anxiety scales, but no change in perceived stress. Participants expressed strong appreciation of the program, and essentially all participants reported the program achieved its goals and was feasible, appropriate, and acceptable. We conclude that M-O-M-S shows promise as a post-disaster intervention, but significant effort in determining enrollment strategies is necessary to reach a wider range of women who would benefit.

Keywords: disaster, implementation, Mental Health, peer support, Pregnancy

Received: 24 Oct 2025; Accepted: 01 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Harville, Giarratano, Patterson, Schultheis, Dorans, Turner, Harris, Longo and Weis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Emily W Harville

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.