ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Ethol.
Sec. Adaptation and Evolution
Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fetho.2025.1656211
This article is part of the Research TopicFarm Animal EthologyView all 3 articles
Beef cattle welfare: The role of Integrated Systems in animal adaptation and productivity
Provisionally accepted- 1Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
- 2Universidade Federal do Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The domestication of cattle has shaped their adaptation to livestock environments, although management conditions often limit their welfare and productivity. This study evaluated whether integrated livestock-forestry (LF) systems improve the behavior, welfare, and productivity of beef cattle compared to conventional livestock systems (L). Eighteen Angus steers were monitored for ten consecutive months on continuous grazing, and welfare indicators were assessed using the welfare criteria of the Welfare Quality® protocol, but with measures adapted to the grazing conditions. The results showed that, although both systems ensured adequate feeding, health, and rest conditions, the animals in the LF system performed better in thermal comfort and human-animal interaction. Specifically, cattle in the LF system had a 2.5°C lower body surface temperature, a 63% smaller flight zone, and an 85% lower reactivity score than cattle in the L system. Average daily weight gain and body condition score did not differ between the systems, indicating that improvements in welfare did not compromise productivity. These results demonstrate that integrated systems improve adaptive behaviors and animal comfort, providing a sustainable approach to balancing animal welfare with production efficiency.
Keywords: Behavior, Livestock, Domestication, Silvipastoral, agroforestry
Received: 29 Jun 2025; Accepted: 12 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Martin, Moraes, Ruthes, Oliveira and Moraes. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Daniela Maria Martin, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.