Abstract
In addition to the deficits in the vestibulo-ocular and vestibulo-spinal reflexes that occur following vestibular dysfunction, there is substantial evidence that vestibular loss also causes cognitive disorders, some of which may be due to the reflexive deficits and some of which are related to the role that ascending vestibular pathways to the limbic system and neocortex play in spatial orientation. In this review we summarize the evidence that vestibular loss causes cognitive disorders, especially spatial memory deficits, in animals and humans and critically evaluate the evidence that these deficits are not due to hearing loss, problems with motor control, oscillopsia or anxiety and depression. We review the evidence that vestibular lesions affect head direction and place cells as well as the emerging evidence that artificial activation of the vestibular system, using galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS), can modulate cognitive function.
Introduction
Recent epidemiological studies have demonstrated that vestibular disorders occur in more than 35% of adults aged 40 or older; between the ages of 60 and 69, the prevalence increases to almost 50% and between 70 and 79, it is 69% (Agrawal et al., ). Saber Tehrani et al. (2013) has estimated that, of 3.9 million patients visiting a Hospital Emergency Department for dizziness or vertigo in the USA in 2011, 25.7% were attributable to otological or vestibular causes, costing US $757 million. Vestibular dysfunction therefore represents a substantial and increasing burden on healthcare systems.
The most obvious effects of poor vestibular function are oscillopsia and ataxia (see Curthoys and Halmagyi, for a review); however, vestibular dysfunction involves a more complex syndrome characterized not only by reflex deficits, but also by attention and memory deficits, and anxiety disorders (see Smith et al., 2010 for reviews). It is evident that, in addition to the role of the vestibular system in the vestibulo-ocular and vestibulo-spinal reflexes (VORs and VSRs), the vestibular information provided in the ascending pathways to the limbic system and neocortex is required for an accurate internal representation of the relationship between the self and the spatial environment (Angelaki et al., ; Chen et al., ). In the absence of this information, this internal representation becomes inaccurate, ambiguous, and cognitive performance is affected. The aim of this review is to summarize and critically evaluate the current literature relating to the effects of vestibular function on cognition.
Animal studies of the effects of vestibular lesions on memory
Many of the early animal studies of spatial navigation suggested that non-visual, idiothetic cues such as vestibular and proprioceptive information, along with external, allocentric cues, were used by animals in order to remember how to navigate their way through a familiar environment (Beritoff, ; Potegal et al., 1977; Etienne, ; Mittelstaedt and Mittelstaedt, 1980; Horn et al., 1981; Potegal, 1982; Miller et al., 1983; Etienne and Jeffery, ). It was speculated that vestibular information must be transmitted to the hippocampus, in order to be integrated with other sensory information relevant to spatial memory (Wiener and Berthoz, 1993; Berthoz, ; McNaughton et al., 1996; Etienne and Jeffery, ). Ultimately it was reported that place cells in the hippocampus, that respond to specific places in the environment, were modulated by vestibular stimulation (Gavrilov et al., ; Wiener et al., 1995), which was supported by numerous animal behavioral studies showing that the disruption of normal vestibular function resulted in spatial memory deficits (Potegal et al., 1977; Horn et al., 1981; Potegal, 1982; Miller et al., 1983; Petrosini, 1984; Mathews et al., 1988, 1989; Semenov and Bures, 1989; Chapuis et al., ; Ossenkopp and Hargreaves, 1993; Stackman and Herbert, 2002; Wallace et al., 2002; Russell et al., 2003a; Zheng et al., 2003, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009a,b, 2012a,b; Baek et al., ; Besnard et al., ; Machado et al., 2012a,b; Smith et al., 2013).
The early studies were open to the interpretation that what appeared to be spatial memory impairment following vestibular damage might be a direct result of oscillopsia, due to VOR deficits, or ataxia, due to VSR deficits. Such deficits never completely compensate even following a unilateral vestibular lesion (Smith and Curthoys, 1989; Curthoys and Halmagyi, ); therefore, this was a reasonable possibility. The first sophisticated study of spatial memory following bilateral vestibular lesions was reported by Wallace et al. (2002), who employed a foraging task, in which rats had to remember their way back to a home base, at 2 weeks post-op. This study, which used chemical lesions of the vestibular labyrinth with intratympanic sodium arsanilate, was well-controlled and used an electronic tracking system to quantify the rats' behavior. They found that rats with bilateral vestibular deaffferentation (BVD) exhibited profound spatial memory deficits in darkness, when visual cues were not available. Over the last decade in particular, many such studies have been conducted at much longer points after the lesion. Some compensation for the vestibular reflex deficits has occurred in the intervening period and yet the spatial memory deficits still persist (Zheng et al., 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009a,b, 2012a,b; Baek et al., ). In the study by Baek et al. (), which employed the longest post-operative time interval to date, rats that were 14 months post-BVD were more severely impaired in a spatial memory foraging task in darkness than at 5 months post-op. (see Figures 1, 2).
Figure 1
Figure 2
Effects of UVD vs. BVD in a spatial memory task in darkness
Especially important is that the spatial memory deficits exhibited by BVD rats were substantially more severe than for animals with unilateral vestibular deafferentation (UVD) (Zheng et al., 2006, 2009b). Rats with UVD showed spatial memory deficits in darkness at 3 months following the lesion, but performed at levels similar to sham controls at 6 months post-op. (Zheng et al., 2006). However, at 5–6 months post-op., while BVD rats had only minimally impaired performance in a foraging task in light, their performance deteriorated substantially in darkness (Zheng et al., 2009b). By 14 months post-op., rats with the same kind of BVD lesions were severely impaired in darkness (Baek et al., ; see Figures 1, 2). In this latter study, even treatment with a cannabinoid receptor agonist, which would normally be expected to cause spatial memory impairment, could not increase the severity of the spatial memory deficits (Figure 2). These deficits in darkness suggest that oscillopsia is not necessary for the spatial navigation impairment to occur.
Spatial memory deficits in light for BVD rats
BVD rats have also been demonstrated to exhibit spatial memory deficits in light. At 6 weeks post-op., rats with BVD performed significantly worse than sham controls in a radial arm maze task even in light (Russell et al., 2003a,b). During spatial alternation in a T maze task in light, rats with BVD exhibited some improvement in performance over time, but at 5 months post-op. their percentage of correct responses was still significantly below normal (Zheng et al., 2007). This result was recently replicated by Zheng et al. (2012a,b), using rats at 4–5 months following BVD (see Figure 3).
Figure 3
Besnard et al. () and Machado et al. (2012a,b) have recently demonstrated similar spatial memory deficits in light using the radial arm maze and Y maze in rats that had sequential unilateral chemical labyrinthectomies using sodium arsanilate (Figure 4). In an automated 5 choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT), which is a task commonly used to assess attentional performance in light, rats with BVD made significantly fewer correct responses, significantly more incorrect responses, with no more omissions, and responded with a reduced latency, compared to sham controls (Zheng et al., 2009a,b; see Figure 5). This study in particular shows that the deficits of BVD rats in these cognitive tasks is not due to an inability to respond, but to incorrect responses.
Figure 4
Figure 5
These studies demonstrate that bilateral vestibular lesions have different effects in different cognitive tasks (i.e., radial arm maze, foraging task, Y and T mazes and 5-CSRTT) and that poor performance is not necessarily contingent upon the animal being in darkness, or light, where the oscillopsia would be expected to be worse, or due to an inability to respond. Therefore, the deficits are more likely to be due to an interaction between reduced cognitive ability and altered sensory input than altered sensory input alone. Studies over the last few years have aimed at elucidating the extent to which the spatial memory deficits may be due to other complications of BVD, such as changes in locomotor activity and anxiety.
Possible relationship between spatial memory deficits and locomotor hyperactivity
Most studies of rats with BVD indicate that they are hyperactive rather than hypoactive (Russell et al., 2003a,b; Goddard et al., ; Zheng et al., 2008, 2009a,b, 2012a,b; Baek et al., ; Besnard et al., ; Stiles et al., 2012; Machado et al., 2012b; see Figure 6). While this makes it difficult to explain poor performance in cognitive tasks in terms of an inability to move, it is conceivable that the hyperactivity prevents the animals from performing accurately in these various cognitive tasks. However, Baek et al. () used regression analyses to show that the poor performance of BVD rats in a foraging task could not be predicted by their hyperactivity (Figure 7). We have recently revisited this issue using multiple linear and random forest regression and found that hyperactivity cannot predict the poor performance of rats in a spatial T maze alternation task, but that the best predictors were whether the animals had received a BVD and the duration of their rearing in an open field maze (Smith et al., 2013; see Figure 8). These results suggest that the poor spatial memory performance of BVD rats cannot be explained by their locomotor hyperactivity. Further evidence in support of this conclusion is that even rats treated with diazepam and exhibiting anxiolytic behavior, still demonstrated the same spatial memory deficits in a radial arm maze task (Machado et al., 2012b).
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Possible relationship between spatial memory deficits and anxiety
It is possible that the association between vestibular dysfunction and anxiety and depression has some connection with the observed cognitive deficits that accompany vestibular lesions (Balaban and Thayer, ; Balaban, ; Staab and Ruckenstein, 2003; Staab, 2006). However, at least in animal studies, there is some evidence to disentangle anxiety and cognition in relation to BVD. Machado et al. (2012b) used the black and white box test to show that rats with BVD exhibited increased anxiety and then administered diazepam to reduce it. Although the diazepam appeared to decrease the animals' anxiety, it had no effect on their poor performance in the radial eight-arm maze (Figure 9). Zheng et al. (2012a,b) attempted a similar experiment using the non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic drug, buspirone. In this case, the BVD animals did not exhibit increased anxiety in the elevated plus maze and buspirone had no effect on the time spent in the open arms of the maze, but neither did it have any effect on the animals' poor performance in a spatial forced alternation T maze task. Similarly, an anxiogenic drug, FG-7142, had no effect either on their spatial memory performance. Both of these studies suggest that, at least in animals, spatial memory deficits following BVD may be independent of anxiety.
Figure 9
Vestibular vs. auditory damage
One of the important limitations of the animal studies in this area is that chemical or surgical lesions of the vestibular labyrinth usually involve damage to the cochlea as well, and therefore it is possible that any cognitive effects of the lesions are partly due to hearing loss. For example, auditory stimulation, including noise trauma, has been reported to affect place cell function (Sakurai, 1990, 1994; Goble et al., ). For this reason, in most of our behavioral studies, sham control animals have their tympanic membranes removed so that sound is no longer transmitted effectively to the malleus, incus and stapes. This can serve as only a partial auditory control, however, because some sound will still be transmitted to the cochlea. Nonetheless, we have consistently found that rats without vestibular lesions but with the tympanic membrane removed perform significantly better in cognitive tasks than animals with vestibular lesions (Zheng et al., 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009a,b, 2012b; Baek et al., ). This result suggests that hearing loss is not the major cause of the spatial memory deficits in animals subjected to BVD, and is consistent with the results from studies of patients with vestibular dysfunction (e.g., Brandt et al., ). In addition, animal studies, using different kinds of aminoglycosides (i.e., streptomycin and neomycin) with different toxicities for the auditory and vestibular hair cells, have shown that the effects of auditory and vestibular lesions on learning and memory are different (Schaeppi et al., 1991). In a radial arm maze task, rats treated with streptomycin, which lesioned the auditory and the vestibular systems, exhibited impaired working memory; however, rats treated with neomycin, which lesioned only the auditory system, did not (Schaeppi et al., 1991). In our tinnitus studies we have found that a unilateral acoustic trauma has no significant effect on spatial memory (Zheng et al., 2011).
It is not clear whether the cognitive deficits associated with vestibular dysfunction in animals are limited to spatial memory impairment. Some animal studies using surgical BVD have also reported deficits in attention (Zheng et al., 2009a) and in object recognition memory that has no spatial component (Zheng et al., 2004). However, others using sequential chemical UVDs have reported no deficits in object recognition memory (Besnard et al., ); therefore, this issue remains to be resolved due to methodological differences between the existing studies.
Human studies of the vestibular lesions on memory
One of the first clinical studies of cognitive function following vestibular loss was reported by Grimm et al. (). They described patients with a perilymph fistula syndrome, who reported symptoms such as positional vertigo but also a variety of psychological symptoms, including memory and attention deficits. From a total of 102 patients, more than 85% of them reported memory loss. The patients had a normal level of intellectual function; however, their performance on digit symbol, block design, paired associate learning and picture arrangement tasks, was impaired. Following this, several studies in the 1990's examined the effects of vestibular damage on spatial navigation in humans. They showed that patients with vestibular disorders exhibited deficits in path navigation (Peruch et al., 1999; Cohen, ; Cohen and Kimball, ; Borel et al., ). However, the tasks involved movement, and therefore it could be argued that the deficits resulted from a complex interaction between cognition and postural control. Other studies examined cognitive performance more directly. Black et al. () found that memory problems were common in patients with vestibular loss due to gentamicin ototoxicity. Jauregui-Renaud and colleagues have published a number of studies reporting that patients with vestibular disorders have high rates of depersonalization/derealization symptoms, which include difficulty focussing attention and thoughts seeming blurred (Sang et al., 2006; Jauregui-Renaud et al., 2008a,b; see Gurvich et al., , for review). Other studies have shown that as postural tasks become more challenging, patients with vestibular disorders exhibit deficits in reaction time and memory (Yardley et al., 2001, 2002; Redfern et al., 2004). In a study by Redfern et al. (2004), patients with unilateral vestibular loss showed large increases in complex and inhibitory reaction time, even while seated. A similar result was reported by Talkowski et al. (2005).
Bilateral vs. unilateral vestibular lesions
The most sophisticated and well-controlled studies of spatial memory following vestibular lesions in humans, have been reported by Schautzer et al. (2003) and Brandt et al. (), who examined the performance in a spatial memory test, the virtual Morris water maze, of 10 patients with bilateral vestibular loss and compared them with age-, sex- and education-matched controls. The task involved moving only a cursor on a computer screen, using a mouse; therefore, performance in the spatial memory task could not have been confounded by VSR deficits. The patients had received bilateral vestibular neurectomies 5–10 years previously for the treatment of neurofibromatosis type 2. They found that the patients with bilateral vestibular loss showed impaired performance in the task when they had to remember a navigation path to a previously visible target; however, they showed no deficit when the target was visible, therefore the effect was specific to memory (see Figure 10). Brandt et al. used the Weschler memory test to show that the patients had normal or above normal non-spatial memory performance. Compared to the controls, the patients also exhibited a significant decrease in the volume of the hippocampus (16.9%). This effect was bilateral, specific to the hippocampus and there was no significant reduction in the total brain volume or in the volume of gray matter or white matter, only a significant increase in cerebrospinal fluid volume. Importantly, only one of the BVD patients had total post-operative hearing loss.
Figure 10
In a study of patients with UVD, Hüfner et al. (2007) reported results from the virtual Morris water maze task that were more complex. During place learning, males with a right UVD and females with a left UVD exhibited a significantly smaller decrease in heading error over the repeated trials compared to the controls and other UVD groups. In addition, inspection of the swim paths showed that only 2 out of the 8 right UVD patients used direct paths to the platform, compared to 12 out of the 16 control subjects, a difference that was statistically significant. In the probe trial, the right UVD patients were found to have a greater heading error than the left UVD patients or control subjects. Finally, in the cued navigation, females with a left UVD performed worse than the other groups in the first visible platform trial. By contrast with the study of Brandt et al. () of patients with BVD, Hüfner et al. (2007) found no significant differences in the hippocampal volume of UVD patients compared to controls. In a later study, Hüfner et al. (2009) reported some subtle deficits in spatial memory in patients with UVD as well as an atrophy of the ipsilateral supramarginal nucleus, the postcentral and superior temporal gyrus and the MT/V5 area, as well as the contralateral thalamus and tegmentum of the mesencephalon. However, zu Eulenburg et al. (2010) reported that patients who had recovered from unilateral vestibular neuritis, exhibited a significant decrease in the volume of the left posterior hippocampus, irrespective of the laterality of the vestibular neuritis. Helmchen et al. (2013) have recently reported the results of a resting state fMRI study of patients with vestibular neuritis. They identified a network of brain regions that was significantly different from controls, including the parietal lobe, the medial aspect of the superior parietal lobule, the posterior cingulate cortex, the middle frontal gyrus, the middle temporal gyrus, the parahippocampal gyrus, the anterior cingulate cortex, the insular cortex, the caudate nucleus, the thalamus and the midbrain.
Consistent with these studies, Hüfner et al. (2010) reported structural changes in the hippocampi of professional dancers and slackliners, who have unusual spatial memory experience. Hufner et al. found that trained subjects exhibited a smaller anterior volume, and a larger posterior volume, in the hippocampal formation, although they showed no difference in spatial memory compared to controls, according to the virtual Morris water maze test.
It is apparent from these studies that the volume of the human hippocampus is sensitive to vestibular input. While the effects of BVD are the most dramatic (Brandt et al., ), the effects of unilateral vestibular loss are more circumscribed (Hüfner et al., 2007; zu Eulenburg et al., 2010; Helmchen et al., 2013).
Vestibular disorders have also been reported to impair mental imagery tasks that involve imagined rotations or translations of objects relative to the environment, which are also spatial in nature (Péruch et al., 2011). Grabherr et al. () found that only patients with bilateral vestibular loss, and not unilateral vestibular loss, exhibited impaired ability to mentally transform images of bodies and body parts compared to controls.
It is not entirely clear whether the cognitive deficits associated with vestibular dysfunction in humans are limited to spatial memory impairment. While some studies have reported that other aspects of memory, attention and general intelligence are normal (Schautzer et al., 2003; Brandt et al., ), others have reported deficits in attention and concentration (Sang et al., 2006; Jauregui-Renaud et al., 2008a,b) and even dyscalculia (Risey and Briner, 1990-1991; Andersson et al., , ; Yardley et al., 2002; see Smith, 2012 for a review).
Possible connection with vestibular reflex dysfunction and vertigo
As with the animal studies, it is possible that any memory impairment following vestibular damage might simply be a result of vestibular reflex deficits, for example, the inability to see clearly due to oscillopsia or ataxia as a consequence of impaired VORs and VSRs (respectively) (Gizzi et al., ). However, studies such as those by Schautzer et al. (2003) and Brandt et al. () were conducted 5–10 years following bilateral vestibular neurectomy. Although the patients would never have recovered normal VOR and VSR function, they would have compensated for the severe acute symptoms (Smith and Curthoys, 1989; Curthoys and Halmagyi, ).
Given the severity of some vestibular disorders such as Ménière's disease, it is possible that any cognitive dysfunction is an indirect consequence of symptoms such as vertigo. However, studies of patients with chronic vestibular loss without vertigo, have reported that the patients still exhibit spatial memory impairment (Guidetti et al., ). Overall, it seems that patients with at least bilateral vestibular loss, suffer from cognitive problems, particularly spatial memory impairment, that are not simply a direct result of vestibular reflex dysfunction (see Smith et al., 2005a,b; Hanes and McCollum, 2006; Smith et al., 2009, 2010; Gurvich et al., , for reviews).
Possible connection with anxiety and depression
In the case of humans, it is much more difficult to separate poor performance in cognitive tests from emotional disorders. Vestibular dysfunction in humans is often associated with anxiety disorders, including panic attacks and phobias, as well as depression (Eagger et al., ; Asmundson et al., ; Balaban and Thayer, ; Balaban, ; Furman and Jacob, ; Monzani et al., 2001; Grunfeld et al., ; Persoons et al., 2003; Pollak et al., 2003; Godemann et al., ,, ; Best et al., ; Staab, 2006; see Gurvich et al., , for review). Anxiety may be a direct consequence of vestibular dysfunction; however, it has also been reported that anxiety disorders can cause dizziness of vestibular origin (Asmundson et al., ; Venault et al., 2001; Bolmont et al., ; Staab et al., 2002; Tecer et al., 2004; Best et al., ; Furman et al., ) and antidepressants such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been reported to relieve dizziness associated with anxiety (Staab et al., 2002; Simon et al., 2005; Horii et al., 2007). It possible that emotional disorders arise indirectly from cognitive impairment. However, Halberstadt and Balaban (2006) have reported that the same neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus that release serotonin, send projections into the amygdala, as well as the brainstem vestibular nucleus. This finding suggests that changes in emotional tone may directly influence the vestibular system.
It is worth noting here that the hippocampus is as much an emotional brain region as one that contributes to spatial memory (Gray and McNaughton, ). While the rat dorsal hippocampus (approximately equivalent to the posterior hippocampus in humans) is involved in spatial information processing and spatial memory, the rat ventral hippocampus (approximately equivalent to the anterior hippocampus in humans) processes emotional stimuli (Bannerman et al., , ). Therefore, it may be difficult to disentangle the effects of vestibular loss on cognition and emotion.
Effects of vestibular lesions on head direction cell and place cell function
Taube and colleagues have shown that bilateral inactivation of the vestibular labyrinth, using intratympanic tetrodotoxin, results in the dysfunction of thalamic head direction cells (Stackman and Taube, 1997; see Brown et al., for a review). In other studies, they have shown that head direction cell activity is degraded during inverted locomotion (Calton and Taube, ) and as a result of the loss of vestibular information from either the otoliths (Yoder and Taube, 2009) or the semi-circular canals (Muir et al., 2009). Also using intratympanic tetrodotoxin, Stackman et al. (2002) first reported that loss of vestibular function resulted in a disruption of the selective firing of hippocampal place cells in alert rats. One of the most important aspects of this result was that the disruption to place cell firing patterns was immediate, and it recovered over time, indicating that long-term changes in hippocampal structure were unnecessary for the changes in place cell function. This result was replicated by Russell et al. (2003b) using permanent surgical BVD in rats.
Hippocampal theta rhythm is a large amplitude, quasi-sinusoidal EEG rhythm of ~5–12 Hz which is believed to serve a cohesive function for the firing of hippocampal place cells (Hasselmo, 2005; Vertes, 2005). Many studies in alert animals have reported that theta rhythm in the frequency range of 6–9 Hz can be recorded during movement (see Zou et al., 2009 for a review). In fact, theta frequency has been shown to increase with increasing speed of locomotion (Jeewajee et al., 2008; Lever et al., 2009). Very few studies have investigated the effects of vestibular lesions on theta rhythm. Stackman et al. (2002) investigated theta in one rat in a study in which they transiently inactivated the vestibular system. In the one animal in which they analyzed theta, they found no significant difference from control animals. Russell et al. (2006) used permanent surgical BVD to investigate the effects of vestibular loss on theta rhythm. In contrast to Stackman et al. (2002), they found that hippocampal theta rhythm was severely disrupted. Not only was the power of theta reduced following BVD, but the quasi-sinusoidal character of the waveform was corrupted. Although the BVD animals were hyperactive, theta rhythm was abnormal across the entire range of movement velocities. These results have recently been replicated by Neo et al. (2012), who tried but failed to reverse the spatial memory and emotional deficits caused by BVD by electrically stimulating the septum in order to provide an artificial theta rhythm. Tai et al. (2012) also recently showed that rats that are administered sodium arsanilate intratympanically exhibit a reduction in theta power.
Taken together, these animal studies support the view that vestibular information is important for the generation of spatial memories (Wiener and Berthoz, 1993; Berthoz, ; McNaughton et al., 1996, 2006; Etienne and Jeffery, ; Smith et al., 2005a,b, 2009, 2010). It is still unclear how vestibular information reaches the hippocampus. Electrical stimulation of one vestibular labyrinth or of the vestibular nucleus has been reported to evoke field potentials, single unit activity and neurotransmitter release in the hippocampus, albeit with a long latency (Horii et al., 1994, 2004; Cuthbert et al., ). Caloric or electrical stimulation of the human labyrinth has been shown to cause activation of the hippocampus (Vitte et al., 1996; De Waele et al., ) and glucose uptake is reduced in the hippocampus in patients with acute vestibular neuritis (Bense et al., ). The thalamus is certain to be one important relay station for the transmission of at least some ascending vestibular information. However, the number of different vestibulo-hippocampal pathways and their precise nature, remains to be determined (Smith, 1997; see Shinder and Taube, 2010 and Hufner et al., 2011 for recent reviews). It must also be kept in mind that the hippocampus is only one part of a highly complex system of limbic-neocortical pathways that are responsible for spatial memory (Guldin and Grusser, ; Hanes and McCollum, 2006; Gu et al., ; Shinder and Taube, 2010; Lopez and Blanke, 2011). In humans, fMRI has revealed that areas of significant activation by galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) include the posterior insula, the retroinsular regions, the superior temporal gyrus, parts of the inferior parietal lobule, the intraparietal sulcus, the post-central and pre-central gyrus, the anterior insular, the inferior frontal gyrus, the anterior cingulate gyrus, the precuneus and the hippocampus (Lobel et al., 1998; see Karnath and Dieterich, 2006 for a review). Activation of cortical networks during GVS is not symmetrical; it appears to be stronger in the non-dominant hemisphere, in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the stimulated ear, and in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the fast phase of vestibular nystagmus (see Karnath and Dieterich, 2006 for a review).
Despite the finding by Brandt et al. () that patients with BVD exhibit a bilateral atrophy of the hippocampus, studies in BVD rats have so far failed to detect such a change. Using a sequential chemical BVD procedure, Besnard et al. () found no significant change in hippocampal volume using MRI. Likewise, Zheng et al. (2012a) could find no change hippocampal volume or neuronal number using stereology. Nonetheless, in unpublished studies, we have found a significant decrease in dendritic length in the hippocampi of BVD rats. One possibility is that hippocampal volume is maintained in rats following BVD due to their locomotor hyperactivity, since movement is known to stimulate hippocampal neurogenesis. Interestingly, Zheng et al. (2012a) observed a significant increase in cell proliferation in the rat hippocampus following BVD. Besnard et al. () also reported an increase in NMDA receptor density and a decrease in affinity in BVD rats. Although Zheng et al. (2013) did not find significant differences in glutamate receptor subunit expression in rats with BVD, principal component analysis did reveal subtle changes in the relationship between different NMDA receptor subunits (Smith and Zheng, 2013). Because Besnard et al. () used autoradioradiography with beta imaging, their results may reflect functional NMDA receptors rather than the total receptor pool.
Effects of artificial vestibular activation on memory in humans
A small literature exists on the use of low amplitude, noisy GVS to enhance cognition in humans. The overlaying of a noise signal on a galvanic stimulus, termed “noisy GVS,” is based upon the concept of stochastic resonance, in which a sub-threshold sensory stimulus can be made to exceed a fixed threshold if a Gaussian noise signal, with a frequency much higher than the sub-threshold stimulus, is superimposed upon it (Moss et al., 2004).
Bächtold et al. () was the first to report that caloric vestibular stimulation (CVS) could improve verbal and spatial memory in humans, and the effect was greater for right ear irrigation. However, CVS induces vestibular reflexes and therefore it is difficult to separate those effects from cognitive performance. Falconer and Mast () have recently reported that CVS can enhance performance in an egocentric transformation task.
In a later study, Wilkinson et al. (2008) investigated whether noisy, low intensity, bipolar GVS, which was sub-threshold for the activation of the vestibular reflexes, could affect memory for faces. They found that the mean reaction time was shorter for the GVS groups compared to the sham controls, but that the largest reduction was for the anode on the left ear and the cathode on the right ear. They concluded that GVS can improve memory for faces, perhaps by increasing blood flow to the right temporal and parietal cortices. This effect of GVS on memory was unlikely to be due to non-specific arousal since the electrical stimulation was sub-threshold, the memory improvement was greater for the anode on the left, and improvement was found only when a noise signal was added to the GVS. Wilkinson and colleagues have also found that noisy GVS can attenuate prosopagnosia (Wilkinson et al., 2005) and figure copying deficits (Wilkinson et al., 2010). In the most recent study involving two patients with visuo-spatial neglect, GVS was found to have a lasting beneficial effect in a target cancellation task (Zubko et al., 2013). In one of the most systematic studies to date, Dilda et al. () found that suprathreshold GVS significantly increased the error rates for match-to-sample and perspective-taking tasks compared to a subthreshold GVS group; however, reaction time, dual tasking, mental rotation and manual tracking were not significantly affected. Subthreshold GVS had no significant effect on cognitive performance compared to the pre-stimulus conditions.
At the present, there is very little evidence relating to how noisy GVS affects memory. It is not clear whether the effect has any relationship to the effects of vestibular lesions on spatial memory. One possibility is that any beneficial effect of GVS is merely a result of the fact that vestibular information reaches many regions of the neocortex (Bense et al., ) and that it will probably cause a change in the integration of sensory information (Wilkinson et al., 2008). However, given the importance of vestibular information to spatial memory, sub-threshold GVS may somehow “prime” the brain to process and store new information. Wilkinson et al. (2012) have recently reported that GVS increased the amplitude of the N170 potential and the power of delta and theta EEG during a face processing task. It is noteworthy that many of these effects of GVS are not restricted to spatial attention or memory. A more recent study by Kim et al. (2013) also supports the idea that GVS modulates neural oscillations.
Conclusions
Over the last 12 years in particular, a substantial body of evidence has accumulated to suggest that the loss of vestibular function results in cognitive disorders, especially spatial memory deficits that cannot easily be attributed to the direct effects of reflex dysfunction, motor control problems or hearing loss. The spatial memory deficits appear to be most striking in the case of BVD, where there is a complete loss of vestibular function, although there are many more animal studies than human studies to substantiate this. It will be particularly important in future studies to further investigate the effects of unilateral and bilateral vestibular loss in humans, on different types of cognitive function.
In animals at least, the spatial memory deficits appear to be independent of anxiety, although this is less conclusive in humans. One reason to be cautious about disentangling the effects of vestibular damage on cognition and emotion, is that the hippocampus is deeply involved in both (Gray and McNaughton, ). While lesions of the dorsal hippocampus in rats result in spatial memory deficits and locomotor hyperactivity, lesions of the ventral hippocampus result in reduced anxiety in the elevated plus maze and hyponeophagia (Bannerman et al., ). It is intriguing that BVD, in addition to causing spatial memory deficits and locomotor hyperactivity in rats, has been reported to cause both reduced anxiety in the elevated plus and T mazes (Zheng et al., 2008; Neo et al., 2012) and hyponeophagia (Zheng et al., 2008). This might suggest that BVD results in behavioral effects that are similar to both dorsal and ventral hippocampal lesions and that it may be very difficult to disentangle them completely.
The cognitive effects of vestibular loss appear to be due mainly to the important contribution that the vestibular system makes to neurons involved in spatial navigation and memory, such as head direction cells and place cells, although exactly how this information is used remains to be determined. Information from the otoliths as well as the semi-circular canals seems to be necessary for the normal function of head direction cells; however, so far the different contributions of the otoliths and semi-circular canals to hippocampal place cell function have not been investigated. Furthermore, despite the attention to the thalamus and hippocampus, many different areas of the limbic system and neocortex are involved in these spatial memory processes. Since grid cells in the entorhinal cortex are thought to be responsible for the place fields of hippocampal place cells (see Giocomo et al., for a review), it might be predicted that BVD would severely disrupt grid cell firing; however, this has not been investigated to date. Future studies will need to specifically address how vestibular information is transmitted to the dorsal and ventral hippocampus in rats and the extent to which otolithic vs. semi-circular canal input is represented in different areas of the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. At present, we know that vestibular input is necessary for the normal function of the hippocampus but we do not understand how this input is being used.
At present there is some evidence that artificial activation of the vestibular system, using noisy GVS, can modulate memory. However, at present this literature is small and it is unclear whether this effect, when it occurs, is related to the same mechanisms by which vestibular lesions affect memory.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Statements
Acknowledgments
This research has been supported by the Marsden Fund and the New Zealand Neurological Foundation. Yiwen Zheng was a recipient of the Health Research Council Sir Charles Hercus Fellowship.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AgrawalY.CareyJ. P.Della SantinaC. C.SchubertM. C.MinorL. B. (2009). Disorders of balance and vestibular function in US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2004. Arch. Int. Med. 169, 938–944. 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.66
2
AnderssonG.HagmanJ.TalianzadehR.SvedbergA.LarsenH. C. (2002). Effects of cognitive load on postural control. Brain Res. Bull. 58, 135–139. 10.1016/S0361-9230(02)00770-0
3
AnderssonG.HagmanJ.TalianzadehR.SvedbergA.LarsenH. C. (2003). Dual task study of cognitive and postural interference in patients with vestibular disorders. Otol. Neurotol. 24, 289–293. 10.1097/00129492-200303000-00026
4
AngelakiD. E.KlierE. M.SnyderL. H. (2009). A vestibular sensation: probabilistic approaches to spatial perception. Neuron64, 448–461. 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.010
5
AsmundsonG. J.LarsenD. K.SteinM. B. (1998). Panic disorder and vestibular disturbance: an overview of empirical findings and clinical implications. J. Psychosom. Res. 44, 107–120. 10.1016/S0022-3999(97)00132-3
6
BächtoldD.BaumannT.SándorP. S.KritosM.RegardM.BruggerP. (2001). Spatial- and verbal-memory improvement by cold-water caloric stimulation in healthy subjects. Exp. Brain Res. 136, 128–132. 10.1007/s002210000588
7
BaekJ.-H.ZhengY.DarlingtonC. L.SmithP. F. (2010). Evidence that spatial memory deficits in rats following bilateral vestibular loss is probably permanent. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 94, 402–413. 10.1016/j.nlm.2010.08.007
8
BalabanC. D. (2002). Neural substrates linking balance control and anxiety. Physiol. Behav. 77, 469–475. 10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00935-6
9
BalabanC. D.ThayerJ. F. (2001). Neurological bases for balance-anxiety links. J. Anxiety Disord. 15, 53–79. 10.1016/S0887-6185(00)00042-6
10
BannermanD. M.DeaconR. M.OffenS.FriswellJ.GrubbM.RawlinsJ. N. (2002). Double dissociation of function within the hippocampus: spatial memory and hyponeophagia. Behav. Neurosci. 116, 884–901. 10.1037/0735-7044.116.5.884
11
BannermanD. M.RawlinsJ. N.McHughS. B.DeaconR. M.YeeB. K.BastT.et al. (2004). Regional dissociations within the hippocampus–memory and anxiety. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 28, 273–283. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.004
12
BannermanD. M.YeeB. K.GoodM. A.HeupelM. J.IversenS. D.RawlinsJ. N. (1999). Double dissociation of function within the hippocampus: a comparison of dorsal, ventral, and complete hippocampal cytotoxic lesions. Behav. Neurosci. 113, 1170–1188. 10.1037/0735-7044.113.6.1170
13
BenseS.StephanT.YousryT. A.BrandtT.DieterichM. (2001). Multisensory cortical signal increases and decreases during vestibular galvanic stimulation (fMRI). J. Neurophysiol. 85, 886–899.
14
BeritoffJ. S. (1965). Neural Mechanisms of Higher Vertebrates. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.
15
BerthozA. (1996). How does the cerebral cortex process and utilize vestibular signals, in Disorders of the Vestibular System, eds BalohR.HalmagyiG. M. (New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press), 113–125.
16
BesnardS.MachadoM. L.VignauxG.BoulouardM.CoquerelA.BouetV.et al. (2012). Influence of vestibular input on spatial and nonspatial memory and on hippocampal NMDA receptors. Hippocampus22, 814–826. 10.1002/hipo.20942
17
BestC.Eckhardt-HennA.DienerG.BenseS.BreuerP.DieterichM. (2006). Interaction of somatoform and vestibular disorders. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry77, 658–664. 10.1136/jnnp.2005.072934
18
BlackF. O.PeszneckerS.StallingsV. (2004). Permanent gentamicin vestibulotoxicity. Otol. Neurotol. 25, 559–569. 10.1097/00129492-200407000-00025
19
BolmontB.GangloffP.VouriotA.PerrinP. P. (2002). Mood states and anxiety influence abilities to maintain balance control in healthy human subjects. Neurosci. Lett. 329, 96–100. 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00578-5
20
BorelL.HarlayF.LoopezC.MagnanJ.ChaysA.LacourM. (2004). Walking performance in vestibular-defective patients before and after unilateral vestibular neurrectomy. Behav. Brain Res. 150, 191–200. 10.1016/S0166-4328(03)00257-2
21
BrandtT.SchautzerF.HamiltonD. A.BruningR.MarkowitschH.KallaR.et al. (2005). Vestibular loss causes hippocampal atrophy and impaired spatial memory in humans. Brain128, 2732–2741. 10.1093/brain/awh617
22
BrownJ. E.YatesB. J.TaubeJ. S. (2002). Does the vestibular system contribute to head direction cell activity in the rat. Physiol. Behav. 77, 743–748. 10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00928-9
23
CaltonJ. L.TaubeJ. S. (2005). Degradation of head direction cell activity during inverted locomotion. J. Neurosci. 25, 2420–2428. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3511-04.2005
24
ChapuisN.KrimmM.de WaeleC.VibertN.BerthozA. (1992). Effect of post-training unilateral labyrinthectomy in a spatial orientation task by guinea pigs. Behav. Brain Res. 51, 115–126. 10.1016/S0166-4328(05)80205-0
25
ChenA.DeangelisG. C.AngelakiD. E. (2013). Functional specializations of the ventral intraparietal area for multisensory heading discrimination. J. Neurosci. 33, 3567–3581. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4522-12.2013
26
CohenH. S. (2000). Vestibular disorders and impaired path integration along a linear trajectory. J. Vestib. Res. 10, 7–15.
27
CohenH. S.KimballK. T. (2002). Improvements in path integration after vestibular rehabilitation. J. Vestib. Res. 12, 47–51.
28
CurthoysI. S.HalmagyiG. M. (1995). Vestibular compensation: a review of the ocular motor, neural and clinical consequences of unilateral vestibular loss. J. Vestib. Res. 5, 67–107. 10.1016/0957-4271(94)00026-X
29
CuthbertP. C.GilchristD. P.HicksS. L.MacDougallH. G.CurthoysI. S. (2000). Electrophysiological evidence for vestibular activation of the guinea pig hippocampus. Neuroreport11, 1443–1447. 10.1097/00001756-200005150-00018
30
De WaeleC.BaudonniereP. M.LepecqJ. C.Tran Ba HuyP.VidalP. P. (2001). Vestibular projections in the human cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 141, 541–551. 10.1007/s00221-001-0894-7
31
DildaV.MacDougallH. G.CurthoysI. S.MooreS. T. (2012). Effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation on cognitive function. Exp. Brain Res. 216, 275–285. 10.1007/s00221-011-2929-z
32
EaggerS.LuxonL. M.DaviesR. A.CoelhoA.RonM. A. (1992). Psychiatric morbidity in patients with peripheral vestibular disorder: a clinical and neuro-otological study. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry55, 383–387. 10.1136/jnnp.55.5.383
33
EtienneA. S. (1980). The orientation of the golden hamster to its nest-site after the elimination of various sensory cues. Experientia36, 1048–1050. 10.1007/BF01965961
34
EtienneA. S.JefferyK. (2004). Path integration in mammals. Hippocampus14, 180–192. 10.1002/hipo.10173
35
FalconerC. J.MastF. W. (2012). Balancing the mind. Vestibular-induced facilitation of egocentric transformations. Exp. Psychol. 59, 332–339. 10.1027/1618-3169/a000161
36
FurmanJ. M.JacobR. G. (2001). A clinical taxonomy of dizziness and anxiety in the otoneurological setting. J. Anxiety Disord. 15, 9–26. 10.1016/S0887-6185(00)00040-2
37
FurmanJ. M.RedfernM. S.JacobR. G. (2006). Vestibulo-ocular function in anxiety disorders. J. Vestib. Res. 16, 209–215.
38
GavrilovV. V.WienerS. I.BerthozA. (1995). Enhanced hippocampal theta EEG during whole body rotations in awake restrained rats. Neurosci. Lett. 197, 239–241. 10.1016/0304-3940(95)11918-M
39
GiocomoL. M.MoserM. B.MoserE. I. (2011). Computational models of grid cells. Neuron71, 589–603. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.07.023
40
GizziM.ZlotnickM.CiceroneK.RileyE. (2003). Vestibular disease and cognitive dysfunction: no evidence for a causal connection. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 18, 398–407. 10.1097/00001199-200309000-00002
41
GobleT. J.MøllerA. R.ThompsonL. T. (2009). Acute high-intensity sound exposure alters responses of place cells in hippocampus. Hear Res. 253, 52–59. 10.1016/j.heares.2009.03.002
42
GoddardM.ZhengY.DarlingtonC. L.SmithP. F. (2008). Locomotor and exploratory behaviour in the rat following bilateral vestibular deafferentation. Behav. Neurosci. 122, 448–459. 10.1037/0735-7044.122.2.448
43
GodemannF.KoffrothC.NeuP.HeuserI. (2004a). Why does vertigo become chronic after neuropathia vestibularis. Psychosom. Med. 66, 783–787. 10.1097/01.psy.0000140004.06247.c9
44
GodemannF.LindenM.NeuP.HeippE.DörrP. (2004b). A prospective study on the course of anxiety after vestibular neuronitis. J. Psychosom. Res. 56, 351–354. 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00079-5
45
GodemannF.SchullerJ.UhlemannH.BuddeA.HeinzA.StröhleA.et al. (2009). Psychodynamic vulnerability factors in the development of panic disorders–a prospective trial in patients after vestibular neuritis. Psychopathology42, 99–107. 10.1159/000203342
46
GrabherrL.CuffelC.GuyotJ. P.MastF. W. (2011). Mental transformation abilities in patients with unilateral and bilateral vestibular loss. Exp. Brain Res. 209, 205–214. 10.1007/s00221-011-2535-0
47
GrayJ. A.McNaughtonN. (2003). The Neuropsychology of Anxiety. An Enquiry into the Function of the Sept-Hippocampal System. 2nd Edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198522713.001.0001
48
GrimmR. J.HemenwayW. G.LebrayP. R.BlackF. O. (1989). The perilymph fistula syndrome defined in mild head trauma. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 464, 1–40. 10.3109/00016488909138632
49
GrunfeldE. A.GrestyM. A.BronsteinA. M.JahanshahiM. (2003). Screening for depression among neuro-otology patients with and without identifiable vestibular lesions. Int. J. Audiol. 42, 161–165. 10.3109/14992020309090425
50
GuidettiG.MonzaniD.TrebbiM.RovattiV. (2008). Impaired navigation skills with psychological distress and chronic peripheral vestibular hypofunction without vertigo. Arch. Otorhinolarngol. Ital. 28, 21–25.
51
GuldinW. O.GrusserO. J. (1998). Is there a vestibular cortex. Trends Neurosci. 21, 254–259. 10.1016/S0166-2236(97)01211-3
52
GurvichC.MallerJ. J.LithgowB.HaghgooieS.KulkarniJ. (2013). Vestibular insights into cognition and psychiatry. Brain Res. 1537, 244–259. 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.08.058
53
GuY.DeAngelisG. C.AngelakiD. E. (2007). A functional link between area MSTd and heading perception based on vestibular signals. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 1038–1047. 10.1038/nn1935
54
HalberstadtA. L.BalabanC. D. (2006). Serotonergic and nonserotonergic neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus send collateralized projections to both the vestibular nuclei and the central amygdaloid nucleus. Neuroscience140, 1067–1077. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.02.053
55
HanesD. A.McCollumG. (2006). Cognitive-vestibular interactions: a review of patient difficulties and possible mechanisms. J. Vestib. Res. 16, 75–91.
56
HasselmoM. E. (2005). What is the function of hippocampal theta rhythm. Linking behavioural data to phasic properties of field potential and unit recording data. Hippocampus15, 936–949. 10.1002/hipo.20116
57
HelmchenC.YeZ.SprengerA.MünteT. F. (2013). Changes in resting-state fMRI in vestibular neuritis. Brain Struct. Funct. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1007/s00429-013-0608-5
58
HoriiA.RussellN.SmithP. F.DarlingtonC. L.BilkeyD. K. (2004). Vestibular influences on CA1 neurons in the rat hippocampus: an electrophysiological study in vivo. Exp. Brain Res. 155, 245–250. 10.1007/s00221-003-1725-9
59
HoriiA.TakedaN.MochizukiT.Okakura-MochizukiK.YamamotoY.YamatodaniA. (1994). Effects of vestibular stimulation on acetylcholine release from rat hippocampus: an in vivo microdialysis study. J. Neurophysiol. 72, 605–611.
60
HoriiA.UnoA.KitaharaT.MitaniK.MasumuraC.KizawaK.et al. (2007). Effects of fluvoxamine on anxiety, depression and subjective handicaps of chronic dizziness patients with or without neuro-otologic diseases. J. Vestib. Res. 17, 1–8.
61
HornK. M.DeWittJ. R.NielsonH. C. (1981). Behavioral assessment of sodium arsanilate induced vestibular dysfunction in rats. Physiol. Psych. 9, 371–378. 10.3758/BF03326998
62
HüfnerK.BinettiC.HamiltonD. A.StephanT.FlanaginV. L.LinnJ.et al. (2010). Structural and functional plasticity of the hippocampal formation in professional dancers and slackliners. Hippocampus21, 855–865. 10.1002/hipo.20801
63
HüfnerK.StephanT.HamiltonD. A.KallaR.GlasauerS.StruppM.et al. (2009) Gray-matter atrophy after chronic complete unilateral vestibular deafferentation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1164, 383–385. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.03719.
64
HüfnerK.HamiltonD. A.KallaR.StephanT.GlasauerS.MaJ.et al. (2007) Spatial memory and hippocampal volume in humans with unilateral vestibular deafferentation. Hippocampus. 17, 471–485. 10.1002/hipo.20283
65
HufnerK.StruppM.BrandtT.SmithP. F.JahnK. (2011). Spatial separation of visual and vestibular processing in the human hippocampus. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1233, 177–186. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06115.x
66
Jauregui-RenaudK.Ramos-ToledoV.Aguilar-BolanosM.Montano-VelazquezB.Pliego-MaldonadoA. (2008a). Symptoms of detachment from the self or from the environment in patients with an acquired deficiency of the special senses. J. Vestib. Res. 18, 129–137.
67
Jauregui-RenaudK.SangF. Y.GrestyM. A.GreenD. A.BronsteinA. M. (2008b). Depersonalisation/derealisation symptoms and updating orientation in patients with vestibular disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry79, 276–283. 10.1136/jnnp.2007.122119
68
JeewajeeA.BarryC.O'KeefeJ.BurgessN. (2008). Grid cells and theta as oscillatory interference: electrophysiological data from freely moving rats. Hippocampus18, 1175–1185. 10.1002/hipo.20510
69
KarnathH.-O.DieterichM. (2006). Spatial neglect–a vestibular disorder. Brain129, 293–305. 10.1093/brain/awh698
70
KimD. J.YogendrakumarV.ChiangJ.TyE.WangZ. J.McKeownM. J. (2013). Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation modulates the amplitude of EEG synchrony patterns. PLoS ONE8:e69055. 10.1371/journal.pone.0069055
71
LeverC.JeewajeeA.BurtonS.O'KeefeJ.BurgessN. (2009). Hippocampal theta frequency, novelty and behavior. Hippocampus19, 409–410. 10.1002/hipo.20557
72
LobelE.KleineJ. F.BihanD. L.Leroy-WilligA.BerthozA. (1998). Functional MRI of galvanic vestibular stimulation. J. Neurophysiol. 80, 2699–2709.
73
LopezC.BlankeO. (2011). The thalamocortical vestibular system in animals and humans. Brain Res Rev. 67, 119–146. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.12.002
74
MachadoM. L.KroichviliN.FreretT.PhiloxèneB.Lelong-BoulouardV.DeniseP.et al. (2012a). Spatial and non-spatial performance in mutant mice devoid of otoliths. Neurosci. Lett. 522, 57–61. 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.06.016
75
MachadoM. L.Lelong-BoulouardV.SmithP. F.FreretT.PhiloxeneB.DeniseP.et al. (2012b). Influence of anxiety in spatial memory impairments related to the loss of vestibular function in rat. Neuroscience218, 161–169. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.05.029
76
MathewsB. L.CampbellK. A.DeadwylerS. A. (1988). Rotational stimulation disrupts spatial learning in fornix-lesioned rats. Behav. Neurosci. 102, 35–42. 10.1037/0735-7044.102.1.35
77
MathewsB. L.RyuJ. H.BockaneckC. (1989). Vestibular contribution to spatial orientation. Evidence of vestibular navigation in an animal model. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 468, 149–154. 10.3109/00016488909139036
78
McNaughtonB. L.BarnesC. A.GerardJ. L.GothardK.JungM. W.KnierimJ. J.et al. (1996). Deciphering the hippocampal polyglot: the hippocampus as a path integration system. J. Exp. Biol. 199, 173–185.
79
McNaughtonB. L.BattagliaF. P.JensenO.MoserE. I.MoserM. B. (2006). Path integration and the neural basis of the ‘cognitive map’. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 663–678. 10.1038/nrn1932
80
MillerS. M.PotegalL.AbrahamL. (1983). Vestibular involvement in a passive transport and return task. Physiol. Psychol. 11, 1–10. 10.3758/BF03326763
81
MittelstaedtM. L.MittelstaedtH. (1980). Homing by path integration in a mammal. Naturewissenschaften67, 556–567. 10.1007/BF00450672
82
MonzaniD.CasolariL.GuidettiG.RigatelliM. (2001). Psychological distress and disability in patients with vertigo. J. Psychosom. Res. 50, 319–323. 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00208-2
83
MossF.WardL. M.SannitaW. G. (2004). Stochastic resonance and sensory information processing: a tutorial and review of application. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115, 267–281. 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.09.014
84
MuirG. M.BrownJ. E.CareyJ. P.HirvonenT. P.Della SantinaC. C.MinorL. B.et al. (2009). Disruption of the head direction cell signal after occlusion of the semicircular canals in the freely moving chinchilla. J. Neurosci. 29, 14521–14533. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3450-09.2009
85
NeoP.CarterD.ZhengY.SmithP. F.DarlingtonC. L.McNaughtonN. (2012). Septal elicitation of hippocampal theta rhythm did not repair the cognitive and emotional deficits resulting from vestibular lesions. Hippocampus22, 1176–1187. 10.1002/hipo.20963
86
OssenkoppK. P.HargreavesE. L. (1993). Spatial learning in an enclosed eight-arm maze in rats with sodium arsinilate-induced labyrinthectomies. Behav. Neural Biol. 59, 253–257. 10.1016/0163-1047(93)91034-K
87
PersoonsP.LuyckxK.DesloovereC.VandenbergheJ.FischlerB. (2003). Anxiety and mood disorders in otorhinolaryngology outpatients presenting with dizziness: validation of the self-administered PRIME-MD Patient Health Questionnaire and epidemiology. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry25, 316–323. 10.1016/S0163-8343(03)00072-0
88
PeruchP.BorelL.GaunetF.Thinus-BlancG.MagnanJ.LacourM. (1999). Spatial performance of unilateral vestibular defective patients in nonvisual versus visual navigation. J. Vestib. Res. 9, 37–47.
89
PéruchP.LopezC.Redon-ZouiteniC.EscoffierG.ZeitounA.SanjuanM.et al. (2011). Vestibular information is necessary for maintaining metric properties of representational space: evidence from mental imagery. Neuropsychologia49, 3136–3144. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.026
90
PetrosiniL. (1984). Task-dependent rate of recovery from hemilabyrinthectomy: an analysis of swimming and locomotor performances. Physiol. Behav. 33, 799–804. 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90050-7
91
PollakL.KleinC.RafaelS.VeraK.RabeyJ. M. (2003). Anxiety in the first attack of vertigo. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 128, 829–834. 10.1016/S0194-5998(03)00454-6
92
PotegalM. (1982). Vestibular and neostriatal contributions to spatial orientation, in Spatial Abilities: Development and Physiological Foundation. ed PotegalM. (New York, NY: Academic Press), 361–387.
93
PotegalM.DayM. J.AbrahamL. (1977). Maze orientation, visual and vestibular cues in two-maze spontaneous alternation of rats. Physiol. Psychol. 5, 414–420.
94
RedfernM. S.TalkowskiM. E.JenningsJ. R.FurmanJ. M. (2004). Cognitive influences in postural control of patients with unilateral vestibular loss. Gait Posture. 19, 105–114. 10.1016/S0966-6362(03)00032-8
95
RiseyJ.BrinerW. (1990-1991). Dyscalculia in patients with vertigo. J. Vestib. Res. 1, 31–37.
96
RussellN.HoriiA.SmithP. F.DarlingtonC. L.BilkeyD. (2003a). Effects of bilateral vestibular deafferentation on radial arm maze performance. J. Vestib. Res13, 9–16.
97
RussellN.HoriiA.SmithP. F.DarlingtonC. L.BilkeyD. (2003b). The long-term effects of permanent vestibular lesions on hippocampal spatial firing. J. Neurosci. 23, 6490–6498.
98
RussellN.HoriiA.SmithP. F.DarlingtonC. L.BilkeyD. (2006). Lesions of the vestibular system disrupt hippocampal theta rhythm in the rat. J. Neurophysiol. 96, 4–14. 10.1152/jn.00953.2005
99
Saber TehraniA. S.CoughlanD.HsiehY. H.MantokoudisG.KorleyF. K.KerberK. A.et al. (2013). Rising annual costs of dizziness presentations to u.s. Emergency departments. Acad. Emerg. Med. 20, 689–696. 10.1111/acem.12168
100
SakuraiY. (1990). Hippocampal cells have behavioral correlates during the performance of an auditory working memory task in the rat. Behav. Neurosci. 104, 253–263. 10.1037/0735-7044.104.2.253
101
SakuraiY. (1994). Involvement of auditory cortical and hippocampal neurons in auditory working memory and reference memory in the rat. J. Neurosci. 14, 2606–2623.
102
SangF. Y.Jáuregui-RenaudK.GreenD. A.BronsteinA. M.GrestyM. A. (2006). Depersonalisation/derealisation symptoms in vestibular disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry77, 760–766. 10.1136/jnnp.2005.075473
103
SchaeppiU.KrinkeG.FitzGeraldR. E.ClassenW. (1991). Impaired tunnel-maze behavior in rats with sensory lesions: vestibular and auditory systems. Neurotoxicology12, 445–454.
104
SchautzerF.HamiltonD.KallaR.StruppM.BrandtT. (2003). Spatial memory deficits in patients with chronic bilateral vestibular failure. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1004, 316–324. 10.1196/annals.1303.029
105
SemenovL. V.BuresJ. (1989). Vestibular stimulation disrupts acquisition of place navigation in the Morris water tank task. Behav. Neural Biol. 51, 346–363. 10.1016/S0163-1047(89)90987-4
106
ShinderM. E.TaubeJ. S. (2010). Differentiating ascending vestibular pathways to the cortex involved in spatial cognition. J. Vestib. Res. 20, 3–23.
107
SimonN. M.ParkerS. W.Wernick-RobinsonM.OppenheimerJ. E.HogeE. A.WorthingtonJ. J.et al. (2005). Fluoxetine for vestibular dysfunction and anxiety: a prospective pilot study. Psychosomatics46, 334–339. 10.1176/appi.psy.46.4.334
108
SmithP. F. (1997). Vestibular-hippocampal interactions. Hippocampus7, 465–471. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1997)7:5<465::AID-HIPO3>3.0.CO;2-G
109
SmithP. F. (2012). Dyscalculia and vestibular function. Med. Hypoth. 79, 493–496. 10.1016/j.mehy.2012.06.032
110
SmithP. F.BrandtT.StruppM.DarlingtonC. L.ZhengY. (2009). Balance before reason in rats and humans. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1164, 127–133. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.03726.x
111
SmithP. F.CurthoysI. S. (1989). Mechanisms of recovery following peripheral vestibular lesions: a review. Brain Res. Rev. 14, 155–180. 10.1016/0165-0173(89)90013-1
112
SmithP. F.DarlingtonC. L.ZhengY. (2010). Move it or lose it: is stimulation of the vestibular system necessary for normal spatial memory. Hippocampus20, 36–43. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1997)7:5<465::AID-HIPO3>3.0.CO;2-G
113
SmithP. F.HaslettS. J.ZhengY. (2013). A multivariate statistical and data mining analysis of spatial memory-related behaviour following bilateral vestibular deafferentation in the rat. Behav. Brain Res. 246, 15–23. 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.02.033
114
SmithP. F.HoriiA.RussellN.BilkeyD.ZhengY.LiuP.et al. (2005a). The effects of vestibular damage on hippocampal function in rats. Prog. Neurobiol. 75, 391–405. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.04.004
115
SmithP. F.ZhengY.HoriiA.DarlingtonC. L. (2005b). Does vestibular damage cause cognitive dysfunction in humans. J. Vestib. Res. 15, 1–9.
116
SmithP. F.ZhengY. (2013). Principal component analysis suggests subtle changes in glutamate receptor subunit expression in the rat hippocampus following bilateral vestibular deafferentation in the rat. Neurosci. Lett. 548, 265–268. 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.05.036
117
StaabJ. P. (2006). Chronic dizziness: the interface between psychiatry and neuro-otology. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 19, 41–48. 10.1097/01.wco.0000198102.95294.1f
118
StaabJ. P.RuckensteinM. J. (2003). Which comes first? Psychogenic dizziness versus otogenic anxiety. Laryngoscope. 113, 1714–1718. 10.1097/00005537-200310000-00010
119
StaabJ. P.RuckensteinM. J.SolomonD.ShepardN. T. (2002). Serotonin reuptake inhibitors for dizziness with psychiatric symptoms. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 128, 554–560. 10.1001/archotol.128.5.554
120
StackmanR. W.ClarkA. S.TaubeJ. S. (2002). Hippocampal spatial representations require vestibular input. Hippocampus12, 291–303. 10.1002/hipo.1112
121
StackmanR. W.HerbertA. M. (2002). Rats with lesions of the vestibular system require a visual landmark for spatial navigation. Behav. Brain Res. 128, 27–40. 10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00270-4
122
StackmanR. W.TaubeJ. S. (1997). Firing properties of head direction cells in the rat anterior thalamic nucleus: dependence on vestibular input. J. Neurosci. 17, 4349–4358.
123
StilesL.ZhengY.DarlingtonC. L.SmithP. F. (2012). The D2 dopamine receptor and locomotor hyperactivity following bilateral vestibular deafferentation in the rat. Behav. Brain Res. 227, 150–158. 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.11.006
124
TaiS. K.MaJ.OssenkoppK. P.LeungL. S. (2012). Activation of immobility-related hippocampal theta by cholinergic septohippocampal neurons during vestibular stimulation. Hippocampus22, 914–925. 10.1002/hipo.20955
125
TalkowskiM. E.RedfernM. S.JenningsJ. R.FurmanJ. M. (2005). Cognitive requirements for vestibular and ocular motor processing in healthy adults and patients with unilateral vestibular lesions. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 1432–1441. 10.1162/0898929054985419
126
TecerA.TükelR.ErdamarB.SunayT. (2004). Audiovestibular functioning in patients with panic disorder. J. Psychosom. Res. 57, 177–182. 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00568-3
127
VenaultP.RudraufD.LepicardE. M.BerthozA.JouventR.ChapouthierG. (2001). Balance control and posture in anxious mice improved by SSRI treatment. NeuroReport12, 3091–3094. 10.1097/00001756-200110080-00022
128
VertesR. P. (2005). Hippocampal theta rhythm: a tag for short-term memory. Hippocampus15, 923–935. 10.1002/hipo.20118
129
VitteE.DerosierC.CarituY.BerthozA.HasbounD.SoulieD. (1996). Activation of the hippocampal formation by vestibular stimulation: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Exp. Brain Res. 112, 523–526. 10.1007/BF00227958
130
WallaceD. G.HinesD. J.PellisS. M.WhishawI. Q. (2002). Vestibular information is required for dead reckoning in the rat. J. Neurosci. 22, 10009–10017.
131
WienerS. I.BerthozA. (1993). Forebrain structures mediating the vestibular contribution during navigation, in Multisensory Control of Movement, ed BerthozA. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 427–456. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198547853.003.0208
132
WienerS. I.KorshunovV. A.GarciaR.BerthozA. (1995). Inertial, substratal and landmark cue control of hippocampal CA1 place cell activity. Eur. J. Neurosci. 7, 2206–2219. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1995.tb00642.x
133
WilkinsonD.FergusonH. J.WorleyA. (2012). Galvanic vestibular stimulation modulates the electrophysiological response during face processing. Vis. Neurosci. 29, 255–262. 10.1017/S0952523812000235
134
WilkinsonD.KoP.KilduffP.McGlincheyR.MilbergW. (2005). Improvement of a face perception deficit via subsensory galvanic vestibular stimulation. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 11, 925–929. 10.1017/S1355617705051076
135
WilkinsonD.NichollsS.PattendenC.KilduffP.MilbergW. (2008). Galvanic vestibular stimulation speeds visual memory recall. Exp. Brain Res. 189, 243–248. 10.1007/s00221-008-1463-0
136
WilkinsonD.ZubkoO.DeGutisJ.MilbergW.PotterJ. (2010). Improvement of a figure copying deficit during subsensory galvanic vestibular stimulation. J. Neuropsychol. 4, 107–118. 10.1348/174866409X468205
137
YardleyL.GardnerM.BronsteinA.DaviesR.BuckwellD.LuxonL. (2001). Interference between postural control and mental task performance in patients with vestibular disorders and healthy controls. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry71, 48–542. 10.1136/jnnp.71.1.48
138
YardleyL.PapoD.BronsteinA.GrestyM.GardnerM.LavieN.et al. (2002). Attentional demands of continuously monitoring orientation using vestibular information. Neuropsychologia40, 373–383. 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00113-0
139
YoderR. M.TaubeJ. S. (2009). Head direction cell activity in mice: robust directional signal depends on intact otolith organs. J. Neurosci. 29, 1061–1076. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1679-08.2009
140
ZhengY.BalabhadrapatruniS.ChungP.GliddonC. M.ZhangM.et al. (2012a). The effects of bilateral vestibular loss on hippocampal volume, neuronal number and cell proliferation in rats. Front. Neurol. 3, 1–8. 10.3389/fneur.2012.00020
141
ZhengY.CheungI.SmithP. F. (2012b). Performance in anxiety and spatial memory tests following bilateral vestibular loss in the rat and effects of anxiolytic and anxiogenic drugs. Behav. Brain Res. 235, 21–29. 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.07.025
142
ZhengY.BalabhadrapatruniS.MunnO.MasumuraC.DarlingtonC. L.SmithP. F. (2009a). Evidence for deficits in a 5 choice serial reaction time task in rats with bilateral vestibular deafferentation. Behav. Brain Res. 203, 113–117. 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.04.027
143
ZhengY.GoddardM.DarlingtonC. L.SmithP. F. (2009b). Long-term deficits on a foraging task after bilateral vestibular deafferentation in rats. Hippocampus19, 480–486. 10.1002/hipo.20533
144
ZhengY.GoddardM.DarlingtonC. L.SmithP. F. (2008). The effects of bilateral vestibular deafferentation on anxiety-related behaviours in Wistar rats. Behav. Brain Res. 193, 55–62. 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.04.018
145
ZhengY.DarlingtonC. L.SmithP. F. (2004). Bilateral vestibular deafferentation impairs object recognition in rat. Neuroreport15, 1913–1916. 10.1097/00001756-200408260-00016
146
ZhengY.DarlingtonC. L.SmithP. F. (2006). Impairment and recovery on a food foraging task following unilateral vestibular deafferentation in rat. Hippocampus16, 368–378. 10.1002/hipo.20149
147
ZhengY.GoddardM.DarlingtonC. L.SmithP. F. (2007). Bilateral vestibular deafferentation impairs performance in a spatial forced alternation task in rats. Hippocampus17, 253–256. 10.1002/hipo.20266
148
ZhengY.HamiltonE.BegumS.SmithP. F.DarlingtonC. L. (2011). The effects of acoustic trauma that can cause tinnitus on spatial performance in rats. Neuroscience186, 48–56. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.04.052
149
ZhengY.PearceJ. M.VannS. D.GoodM.TrishA.SmithP. F.et al. (2003). Using idiothetic cues to learn a swim path with a fixed trajectory and distance: Involvement of the hippocampus but not the retrosplenial cortex. Behav. Neurosci. 117, 1363–1377. 10.1037/0735-7044.117.6.1363
150
ZhengY.WilsonG.StilesL.SmithP. F. (2013). Glutamate receptor subunit and calmodulin kinase II expression in the rat hippocampus, with and without T maze experience, following bilateral vestibular deafferentation. PLoS ONE8:e54527. 10.1371/journal.pone.0054527
151
ZouD.AitakeM.HoriE.UmenoK.FukudaM.OnoT.et al. (2009). Rat hippocampal theta rhythm during sensory mismatch. Hippocampus19, 350–359. 10.1002/hipo.20524
152
ZubkoO.WilkinsonD.LangstonD.SakelM. (2013). The effect of repeated sessions of galvanic vestibular stimulation on target cancellation in visuo-spatial neglect: preliminary evidence from two cases. Brain Inj. 27, 613–619. 10.3109/02699052.2013.767938
153
zu EulenburgP.StoeterP.DieterichM. (2010). Voxel-based morphometry depicts central compensation after vestibular neuritis. Ann. Neurol. 68, 241–249. 10.1002/ana.22063
Summary
Keywords
vestibular, spatial memory, cognition, hippocampus, vestibular lesions
Citation
Smith PF and Zheng Y (2013) From ear to uncertainty: vestibular contributions to cognitive function. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 7:84. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00084
Received
01 August 2013
Accepted
07 November 2013
Published
26 November 2013
Volume
7 - 2013
Edited by
Stephane Besnard, INSERM U1075, France
Reviewed by
Alberto E. Pereda, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, USA; Stephane Besnard, INSERM U1075, France
Copyright
© 2013 Smith and Zheng.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Paul F. Smith, Department Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medical Sciences, and the Brain Health Research Centre, University of Otago, Frederick St., 9045, Dunedin, New Zealand e-mail: paul.smith@stonebow.otago.ac.nz
This article was submitted to the journal Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.