Abstract
This study explored the effects of septal glutamatergic transmission on septal-hippocampal theta activity via intraseptal microinjection of antagonist at AMPA receptors (AMPAR). The current results showed that microinjection of AMPAR antagonist, NBQX (2,3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoyl-benzo[f]quinoxaline-2,3-dione, 20 μg/μl, 0.5 μl), evoked a decrease in the frequency of theta activity evoked by various means in anesthetized and behaving rat. Theta wave activity was induced on: (a) intraseptal microinjection of carbachol, an agonist at cholinergic receptors, (b) reticular stimulation, (c) exploration in novel open field (OF), and (d) hind paw (HP) injection of the algogen, formalin. The effect on frequency in the formalin test was observed in an early period on injection of formalin, which was novel to the animal, but not in the later more sustained phase of the formalin test. The effect of NBQX, being seen in both anesthetized and behaving animals, suggests that the modulation of theta wave frequency, including in novelty, is a function of AMPAR in MS. The effect of the antagonist on theta power was less apparent, being observed only in anesthetized animals. In addition to theta power and frequency, intraseptal NBQX also attenuated suppression of CA1 population spike (PS) induced by intraseptal carbachol, thus suggesting that septal glutamate neurotransmission is involved in the spectrum of MS-mediated network responses. Indeed, in the context of behavior, formalin injection induced an increase in the level of septal glutamate, while NBQX attenuated nociceptive behaviors. Notably, MS is involved in the modulation of formalin nociception. These findings suggest that AMPA receptors are a key modulator of septal physiological function.
Introduction
The medial septal region (MS) is implicated in various aspects of behavior such as affect-motivation, cognition, behavioral arousal, and sensorimotor integration (Winson, ; Gray, ; Bland, , ; Givens and Olton, ; Nagahara and McGaugh, ; Gray and McNaughton, ; Bland and Oddie, ; Ma et al., ; McNaughton and Corr, ; McNaughton et al., ; Shin et al., ; Ang et al., , ; Wang et al., ). Additionally, our laboratory has also shown that MS is a nodal region in mediating persistent unprovoked nociception and peripheral hypersensitivity (PH) to external stimulus following peripheral injury in rodents (Khanna and Sinclair, ; Khanna, ; Zheng and Khanna, ; Tai et al., ; Lee et al., ; Ang et al., ; Ariffin et al., ). Functionally, the MS regulates hippocampal theta wave activity which is a 4–12 Hz extracellular sinusoidal waveform that provides the basis for temporal organization of information in the hippocampus (Leung, ; Bland, ; Buzsáki, ). For example, an impairment of spatial memory correlates with the extent of decrease in hippocampal theta upon septal lesion, while restoring hippocampal theta rhythmicity with intracerebral stimulation rescued learning impairment caused by septal inactivation (Winson, ; McNaughton et al., ). Theta synchronization is also observed in parallel with voluntary behaviors and its amplitude and frequency may vary with moment-to-moment shifts in behavior (McFarland et al., ; Bland et al., ; Vandecasteele et al., ; Bender et al., ; Barth et al., ).
The septal glutamatergic neuropil and intraseptal glutamatergic transmission have been proposed to affect a wide range of septo-hippocampal functions, including theta activation, sensorimotor behaviors, PH, and cognition (Elvander-Tottie et al., ; Fuhrmann et al., ; Ariffin et al., ). Although stimulation of intraseptal afferent in theta range induced AMPA currents, the role of these receptors in theta mediation still remains unclear (Armstrong and MacVicar, ; Leung and Shen, ; Bland et al., ). While there is evidence of AMPAR-mediated nociceptive process in experimental neuropathic pain (Ariffin et al., ), there is a lack of information on its role in acute nociception within the septo-hippocampal network.
Therefore, in this study, we first investigated whether septal AMPAR mechanisms are involved in septo-hippocampal network responses in anesthetized animals. The septo-hippocampal activation was induced indirectly by reticular stimulation, or directly by intraseptal microinjection of AMPA and carbachol. Both induced a robust hippocampal theta activation and suppression of pyramidal cell somatic excitation of hippocampal CA1. These mimic the processing observed in the formalin test and during behavioral arousal (Khanna, ; Zheng and Khanna, ). We then used the AMPAR antagonist NBQX to examine the effect of the antagonist on theta activation and behavior induced by hind paw (HP) injection of the algogen, formalin, and on exposure to a novel open field (OF). The formalin injection induces animal ambulation and theta activation that parallels changes in nociceptive behaviors. Thus, this model is useful to evaluate septal glutamatergic modulation of sensory-related behaviors, sensorimotor integration, and related theta activation. Additionally, the release of glutamate in the MS during open field exploration and formalin-induced behaviors was also explored using the amperometric technique.
Material and Methods
Animals
Seven-week-old adult male Sprague–Dawley rats (270–330 g at the time of surgery) were used. The experiments followed the Ethical Guidelines of the International Association for the Study of Pain (Zimmermann, ) and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the National University of Singapore (NUS).
Surgery and Electrode Placements in Anesthetized Animals
The animals were anesthetized with urethane (1 g/kg, i.p.; Sigma, USA), mounted onto a stereotaxic frame, and prepared for electrophysiological recording from left hippocampus field CA1 (AP 4.0 mm, ML 2.5 mm, DV 2.0–3.0 mm from the cortical surface; Paxinos and Watson, ) by following the procedure as previously described (Jiang and Khanna, , ). Urethane was prepared as 50% w/v solution made by dissolving the crystals in heated saline. The signal recorded by a carbon-fiber glass microelectrode was amplified 500× and split into two to record field activity (1–100 Hz) and population spike (PS; 1–1,000 Hz). Recordings were taken from the pyramidal cells layer which was determined by the presence of characteristic complex spike cell activity. CA1 PS was generated on stimulation of ipsilateral field CA3 (AP 3.0 mm, ML 2.0 mm, AV 4.0 mm from the cortical surface; 0.1 Hz, 0.01 ms pulse duration) with a stainless steel concentric bipolar electrode (Model NE-100, David Kopf, USA). The CA3 stimulation intensity was adjusted to evoke PS at either 75% or 25% of maximal PS amplitude (annotated as 75% PS or 25% PS respectively) under large irregular field activity (LIA).
Reticular Stimulation in Anesthetized Animals
In these animals, hippocampal theta wave activity was generated by stimulating the rostral pontine oralis nucleus (RPO; AP 8.0 mm, ML 0.8 mm, DV 9.0 mm from the cortical surface) of the reticular formation, ipsilateral to the recording site. The RPO was stimulated every 10 s for a duration of 2.56 s (100 Hz train, 0.01 ms pulse duration) using a stainless steel concentric bipolar electrode (Model NE-100, David Kopf, USA). The CA3 was also stimulated 10 ms from the end of RPO stimulation. The RPO stimulation was adjusted to evoke theta activity at ~ 4–5 Hz and suppression of the CA1 PS (Jiang and Khanna, ).
Drug Microinjection in Anesthetized Animals
The drug(s) were microinjected either using a single 33G microinjection stainless steel needle/cannula coupled to an Exmire syringe (Ito Corporation, Japan) or via a double-barreled silicon cannula assembly made by fusing two 33G silicon cannula (WPI, USA; Ariffin et al., ). The microinjection cannula was directed at a 14° angle to the vertical to the MS region. The two cannula barrels were oriented along the rostral-caudal axis and were used for pharmacological investigations that involved the microinjection of an agonist and an antagonist into the MS. The single 33G needle was used to microinject glutamate antagonist in experiments involving intracerebral stimulation.
Surgery and Implantation of Cannula and Electrodes for Investigations in Behaving Animals
The procedure has been described previously (Lee et al., ; Ang et al., ; Ariffin et al., ). Briefly, rats were anesthetized with an isoflurane-oxygen mixture (5% for induction and 2% for maintenance) and mounted onto a stereotaxic frame with the surface of the skull in a horizontal plane. A single 26G microinjection stainless steel guide cannula (Plastic One) was implanted into the MS (AP 0.5 mm, ML 0.0 mm, DV 5.4 mm from the skull surface) and subsequently secured to the skull with stainless screws and dental cement (Shofu Inc., Kyoto, Japan). In most animals, hippocampal depth recording electrodes were implanted along with a septal microinjection cannula. This was to investigate the effect of drug microinjection on hippocampal field activity accompanying the behavioral responses. The electrodes were constructed by twisting a pair of stainless steel wires together (A-M system, Carlsborg, WA, USA) and implanted into the dorsal CA1 (Lee et al., ; Ang et al., ). The two tips of the electrode that were lowered into the brain were spaced 0.5–1 mm apart in the vertical direction. Separate gold-plated male connector pins (A–M Systems, USA) were soldered onto the free end of the wires. The male connector pins at the free end of all the electrodes, including a ground screw electrode, were pushed into a 9-pin ABS plug (Ginder Scientific, Nepean, ON, Canada) which was then secured onto the skull with dental cement (Shofu Inc., Kyoto, Japan).
For electrochemical analysis of septal extracellular glutamate levels, a guide cannula was directed towards the MS (AP 0.5 mm, ML 0.0 mm, DV 4.7 mm from the skull surface). The guide cannula was lowered at a more superficial depth as the biosensor protrudes out by 2.3 mm from the tip of the guide cannula. A small amount of dental cement was applied to stabilize the guide cannula. A plastic receptacle, which later held the wireless potentiostat to facilitate wireless recording, was also secured to the skull.
Microinjection in Behaving Animal
The procedure has been described previously (Lee et al., ; Ang et al., ; Ariffin et al., ). Briefly, the animal was restrained lightly while a stainless-steel internal cannula (33G, Plastics One, USA) was lowered through the guide cannula to microinject drug solutions. The experimenter was blind to the drug being administered. The drug was administered over 30 s. The internal cannula was left in situ for at least 1 min after drug administration to facilitate diffusion and minimize backflow of the drug. To test that the microinjection assembly system was functioning properly, some solution was pushed out before the insertion and upon removal of the internal cannula after drug microinjection.
Open Field and Hippocampal Field Activity Recording
Hippocampal field activity during exploratory behavior was recorded via a thin flexible wire screwed on to the animal’s head stage at one end and connected to an amplifier (500× amplification, band-pass filtered at 1–100 Hz, Grass amplifier, Astromed Inc, USA) at the other end via a commutator. Before the start of novel open field observation, baseline hippocampal field activity was recorded during exploration in a familiar environment adjacent to the novel location. Exploratory behavior of the animal, which was defined as purposeful locomotion when the animal crossed the cage or reared on hind paws, was recorded for 10 min.
Subsequently, the animal was microinjected with NBQX or vehicle and transferred to a novel behavioral room for the open field experiment. The open field experiment was conducted as previously described (Ang et al., ). The animal was introduced into the novel chamber (43.2 cm length × 43.2 cm width × 30.5 cm height) from the lower right corner at 5 or 15 min after drug microinjection. The time of drug pre-treatment was varied to determine whether the greater availability of the antagonist in MS with shorter pre-treatment would affect the behavioral response over time. The ambulatory behavior was monitored for 20 min. The animal’s ambulatory behavior (ambulatory distance traveled and speed) was captured by the infrared beams and quantified digitally using the activity monitoring software (ActiMot, Med Associates Inc., USA).
Formalin Test
Animal behavior in the formalin test was recorded together with hippocampal field activity in experiments that involved intraseptal microinjection of NBQX (see below). The animal was habituated for at least an hour to the test cage (43.2 cm length × 21.7 cm width × 30.5 cm height) and recording cable for three consecutive days before the experiment. On the test day, the baseline hippocampal field activity was recorded during exploration before NBQX (20 μg/μl) or vehicle was microinjected into the MS. As with the open field test, the formalin test was performed 5 or 15 min after the microinjection of the drug into the MS. The animal was restrained lightly and formalin (1.25%, 0.1 ml) was injected into the plantar surface of the right hind paw using a 27G needle (Tai et al., ). The animal was immediately returned to the chamber and the hippocampal field activity, together with the nociceptive behaviors (flinching and licking of the injured paw) was recorded for 90 min, except for experiments involving amperometric recording of glutamate current. The animal’s ambulatory behavior was also recorded using the infrared sensors of the activity monitor (see above).
Amperometric Analysis Using Glutamate Biosensor
This experiment investigated the change in septal extracellular glutamate concentration in the formalin test using an enzyme (glutamate oxidase)-based, glutamate-selective biosensor (Pinnacle Technology Inc., USA). The glutamate-sensitive biosensor was connected to a wireless potentiostat and placed inside the receptacle secured previously during surgery. The potentiostat, in turn, signaled to the recording software (Sirenia® software) via Bluetooth. Changes in glutamate concentration around the electrode were transduced into electrical current (nA per s).
The biosensors were calibrated pre- and post-experiment to test the functionality of the biosensor. The calibration protocol was recommended by the manufacturer (Pinnacle Technology Inc., USA) and was previously published by Wakabayashi and Kiyatkin (). The biosensor oxidation current was measured by increasing L-glutamate concentration in vitro in the buffer. The oxidation of the electrode arises from H2O2 that is produced because of the enzymatic reaction between L-glutamate and the enzyme associated with the biosensor. The glutamate concentration was increased in three consecutive steps by adding boluses of 40 μl of 5 mM L-glutamate solution (Sigma, USA) into the buffer (100 mM phosphate buffer saline, pH 7.4. 20 ml; VWR, USA) at 1 min intervals. Negative control involved the addition of ascorbic acid (an interference solution; 50 μl of 100 mM solution; Sigma, USA) to the testing buffer. At the end of calibration, 20 ml of phosphate buffer saline was added to halve the glutamate concentration in the test buffer to determine the biosensor’s ability to detect a fall in glutamate concentration. Separate pre- and post-experiment calibration tests were done to test the sensitivity of the biosensor by adding lower concentrations of L-glutamate (0.01–1.0 μM) into a fresh testing buffer.
During the experiment, the animal was habituated as described above. The biosensor was inserted into the MS via the implanted guide cannula the night before the formalin test after carrying out the pre-experiment calibration. On the test day, the animal was acclimatized to the environment before carrying out the formalin test. The test involved hind paw injection of saline (0.1 ml) and formalin (1.25%, 0.1 ml) into the left and the right hind paw, respectively. The injections were about 70 min apart. A baseline amperometric current was recorded for 10 min before each hind paw injection. The recording was continued for 60 and 90 min after saline and formalin injections, respectively. In addition, animal ambulatory behavior and speed were also recorded as described above. In the experiments described above, we preferred to administer the saline injection into the hind paw before performing the formalin test. Hind paw injection of formalin can sensitize neurons in CNS which may confound the response to hind paw saline. Further, although formalin was injected after saline injection, the biphasic pattern of behavioral response that is characteristic of formalin was still observed. Since saline per se did not affect glutamate levels we did not perform repeated saline injections.
At the end of the experiment, the animal was anesthetized, and the glutamate biosensor was carefully removed from its guide cannula for post-experiment calibration (see above) to determine the integrity of the biosensor during the experiment.
Drugs
The following drugs were administered into either the MS or the lateral septum (LS) region of the brain: (a) 2,3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoyl-benzo[f]quinoxaline-2,3-dione (NBQX disodium salt; 0.5 μl of 10 and 20 μg/μl solution; MW: 380.24 g/mol; 26.30 and 52.60 mM; Tocris, USA), which is a glutamate AMPA receptor antagonist, (b) α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA; 0.5 μl of 0.044 μg/μl; MW: 222.20 g/mol, 198 mM; Tocris, USA), an agonist at glutamate AMPAR and, (c) carbamylcholine chloride (carbachol, 0.5 μl of 0.156 μg/μl; MW: 182.696 g/mol; 0.854 mM; Sigma, USA), a cholinergic receptor agonist (Jiang and Khanna, ). The drugs were prepared in vehicle which has Alcian blue dye (0.5% w/v in saline, Sigma, USA). The vehicle was used for “control” microinjections.
Histology
As previously reported (Lee et al., ), after perfusion and fixation with 5% v/v of formaldehyde (VWR, Germany), the brain was sectioned into 100-μm coronal sections using a vibratome (Leica VT 1200 Semi-Automatic Vibrating Blade Microtome, Leica Microsystems, Germany) and stained using 0.5% w/v Cresyl violet stain (Sigma, USA).
Data Analysis
Electrophysiological Analysis
All electrophysiological data were collected and digitized using A/D converter (Power 141) and Spike2 program (Cambridge Electronic Design, UK). The hippocampal field activity and PS were digitized at 256 Hz and 10 kHz, respectively.
The data were analyzed as previously reported (Jiang and Khanna, , ; Tai et al., ; Ariffin et al., ; Lee et al., ). The following parameters were analyzed: (a) change in the duration of theta wave activity (s/min or s/5 min), (b) change in fast Fourier transform (FFT) peak power in theta range in anesthetized (3–6 Hz), and behaving animal (4–12 Hz; i.e., FFT theta peak power), (c) change in FFT peak frequency in the theta range (i.e., FFT theta peak frequency), and (d) change in amplitude (mV) of the PS.
During analysis of theta wave activity, the field trace was digitally band-pass filtered at 1–40 Hz (FIR filter). Data were calculated using artifact-free field activity traces. Duration of theta was determined by calculating the total time for which theta was visually identified as a continuous sinusoidal oscillation of at least 1 s duration at frequencies of 3–6 Hz or 4–12 Hz in anesthetized and behaving animals, respectively. FFT analyses (frequency resolution of 0.5 Hz) were performed on theta wave activity (minimum of 2 s) recorded during the experiment. The FFT theta peak power of RPO- and pharmacological-induced theta wave activity was normalized to the average FFT theta peak power in the baseline (pre-microinjection) period and the power of spontaneous theta, respectively. For statistical analyses in behaving animals, the theta peak power recorded during open field and the formalin test was normalized against the peak theta power recorded during exploration in the familiar environment just before the start of the respective experiments.
The hippocampal theta activity recorded in the formalin test was further analyzed offline by dividing it into sensory behavior-related and residual theta activity. Sensory behavior-related theta was defined as theta wave activity observed in parallel with formalin-induced flinching or licking of the injured paw. Stretches of theta wave activity of at least 2 s duration were used for analysis. In an event where nociceptive behavior was brief, for example, only one flinch was observed, a 2 s of theta wave activity (1 s before and 1 s after the flinch) was taken for analysis. Residual theta activity reflects theta wave activity that was not concurrent with formalin-induced nociceptive behaviors and may include theta wave activity that parallels formalin-induced ambulation.
Amperometric Analysis
The data obtained was analyzed for the following parameters: (a) time course of normalized glutamate current (nA). The current was normalized to baseline current before hind paw injection of saline or formalin, (b) average change in concentration of glutamate (μM) at selected time points for experiments that met the biosensor sensitivity current threshold. Based on the post-experiment calibration curve, the lowest L-glutamate concentration that was detected by all the glutamate biosensors used in this experiment was 0.1 μM which was taken as the threshold concentration that induces a measurable current. The mean current evoked by 0.1 μM L-glutamate was 0.034 ± 0.011 nA, which was used as the biosensor current sensitivity threshold.
The glutamate currents were analyzed using a custom-made program in MATLAB (MathWorks, USA). The current values recorded from the glutamate and null biosensors implanted into MS were binned in 5 min blocks to improve the signal to noise. The signal from the null biosensor was subtracted from the signal recorded from the glutamate biosensor to remove any signal inherent with the biosensor. The post-experiment calibration curves obtained for all electrodes showed a positive linear relationship with glutamate concentration. Thus, a regression line was fitted for each electrode and the concentration of glutamate at the specific time point of interest was calculated using the equation: x = (y − c) / m, where y is the current and x is the glutamate concentration. The calibration constants m and c for each electrode were obtained from the post-experiment calibration concentration curve regression line.
Behavioral Analysis
An ambulatory episode was recorded when the animal’s movement exceeded four in-built infrared beams (i.e., box size of about 10 × 10 cm) in 500 ms. The square box was centered on the animal and the distance between the center of the starting square position to the center of the next square position is taken as ambulatory distance traveled. Ambulatory speed is the ratio of the ambulatory distance traveled by the animal continuously in 2 s or more to the time taken to cover the distance. Licking was measured as the duration for which the dorsal and/or plantar region of the injured paw was licked by the animal, while flinching was the number of shakes of the injured paw.
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. The data were analyzed using one of the following statistical tests (Prism 8, GraphPad Software Inc.): (a) two-way repeated measures (RM) ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test of a time course, to analyze the effect of treatment within each time point or the effect of time within each treatment, (b) one-way ANOVA/one-way RM ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test to compare multiple groups, and (c) one-way RM ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc to analyze change in the time course of a parameter in an experiment involving a single treatment. Statistical significance was accepted at P ≤ 0.05. In an event where data showed an unequal variance in Bartlett’s test, the data were normalized by log transformation and re-analyzed.
Results
Theta wave activity was recorded from the stratum radiatum of field CA1 during experiments in behaving animals. The onset and offset of animal nociceptive behavior, i.e., flinching and licking were marked onto Spike2 during the formalin test. To gauge the effect of NBQX treatment on neural activities, experiments were performed in both anesthetized and awake animals.
Effect of Intraseptal NBQX on RPO-Induced Neural Responses in Anesthetized Animals
This experiment investigated the effect of intraseptal NBQX microinjection (0.5 μl of either 10 or 20 μg/μl) on RPO-induced hippocampal theta field activity and the suppression of CA1 PS (Figures 1, 2). It has been proposed that the brainstem is important for mediating changes in CA1 excitability that accompany theta activation during behavioral arousal. Furthermore, the RPO-induced theta wave activity and suppression of PS are mediated through the hypothalamic supramammillary nucleus (SuM) and involve the MS (Jiang and Khanna, ; Ariffin et al., ). Interestingly, the SuM projection to MS is partly glutamatergic in nature (Leranth and Kiss, ). Thus, this experiment explored the glutamatergic nature of RPO stimulation-induced theta activation and suppression.
Figure 1
Figure 2
The protocol used was adapted from Jiang and Khanna (), where the time course of drug effect was monitored on hippocampal responses evoked with stimulation of RPO at an intensity threshold that evoked basal theta activity of ~ 4–5 Hz (T V or T volt). The experiment was designed such that the vehicle was microinjected first followed by NBQX (Figures 1, 2).
In addition, RPO was also stimulated at T + 1 V before the onset of time course investigations (Basal; Supplementary Figure 1) and at 20 min after NBQX microinjection (Figure 2F) to examine the effect of drug treatment on supra-threshold stimulation-induced responses. The suprathreshold stimulation was factored into the protocol to evoke theta wave activity in a situation when T V failed to elicit clear theta rhythm after application of NBQX. As illustrated below, this enabled verification of drug effect against an overt theta background. T + 1 V stimulation was not applied following vehicle microinjection as it was anticipated that vehicle will not affect the electrophysiological parameters. Indeed, as mentioned below and shown in Figure 2, vehicle pre-treatment does not influence theta parameters even at the lower intensity (T V) of RPO stimulation. Here it is notable that both the power and frequency of basal theta wave activity evoked on T + 1 V stimulation were higher than the corresponding values at T V stimulation (Supplementary Figure 1).
The onset of RPO stimulation induced a strong suppression of PS (Figure 2A). The average amplitude of PS in the 2 min before RPO stimulation was 6.27 ± 0.162 mV (n = 12), which significantly decreased to 3.80 ± 0.166 mV (n = 12; t23 = 12.38, P < 0.0001; two-tailed paired t-test) in the 2 min following RPO stimulation. The time course of PS suppression following the onset of RPO stimulation was sustained and unaffected by microinjection of vehicle (Figure 2A, F5, 56 = 17.93, P < 0.0001, one-way RM ANOVA). Although there seems to be an increase in PS amplitude across time post-NBQX20 microinjection, Bonferroni post hoc analysis did not indicate any significant difference compared to baseline values at −2 and −1 min (Figure 2B, time × treatment: F29, 290 = 1.702, P = 0.016, treatment: F1, 10 = 0.0311, P = 0.863, two-way RM ANOVA).
The administration of vehicle into the MS also did not have a significant effect on the time course of RPO-induced theta power (Figure 2C, F11, 121 = 0.315, P = 0.981, one-way RM ANOVA). Similarly, NBQX10 microinjection did not have a significant effect on the time course of RPO-induced theta power but the higher concentration of NBQX (NBQX20) induced a significant attenuation of FFT theta peak power along the time course compared to baseline (Figure 2D, time × treatment: F29, 290 = 4.896, P < 0.0001, treatment: F1, 10 = 6.533, P = 0.029, two-way RM ANOVA). It is important to note that theta wave activity was lost around ~30 s to 1 min in four of six experiments following microinjection of NBQX20. In absence of overt theta, the peak FFT peak power in the theta range was used for analysis of the time course.
The average peak RPO-induced theta power was also significantly reduced with NBQX20 but not on NBQX10 or vehicle microinjections (Figure 2E, F5, 42 = 2.907, P = 0.0242; one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test). Note that the pre-microinjection theta power was similar across all groups.
As indicated above, theta wave activity evoked with T V stimulation was lost following microinjection of NBQX20. Since the lack of clear theta wave activity could mask the actual drug effects, we compared the effects of NBQX on theta parameters evoked with T + 1 V stimulation. In this context, theta parameters under T + 1 V stimulation recorded before the start of the experiment (Basal) and 20 min after microinjection (NBQX10 or NBQX20) were compared. Similar to T V stimulation, theta power at T + 1 V was also significantly attenuated by NBQX20 but not on NBQX10 microinjection (Supplementary Figure 1C, F3, 20 = 5.071, P = 0.0090; one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test). Similarly, RPO theta frequency was attenuated by NBQX20 (Figure 2F; F3, 20 = 3.488, P = 0.0349; one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test).
Effect of Intraseptal NBQX on AMPA- and Carbachol-Induced Neural Responses in Anesthetized Animals
In this experiment, we examined if the selected dose of intraseptal NBQX (10 or 20 μg/μl, 0.5 μl) antagonizes the suppression of PS response (at 25% of maximal) and theta activation triggered by direct activation of MS neurons with intraseptal AMPA (0.044 μg/μl, 0.5 μl). A total of 25 animals were used in this experiment.
During the experiment, AMPA was microinjected thrice (A1, A2, and A3), at least 1 h apart. NBQX or Vehicle was microinjected 15 min before A2 and denoted as NBQX10-A2, NBQX20-A2, or Vehicle-A2. CA1 PS was recorded for 2 min during the period of large irregular field activity (LIA) before each microinjection. The ability of NBQX to antagonize AMPA-induced responses was analyzed up to 10 min post-AMPA microinjection (Figure 3A).
Figure 3
Across all experimental groups the suppression of PS with first microinjection of AMPA (A1) was similar (Vehicle, 66.13 + 7.42% vs. NBQX10, 69.85 + 5.75% vs. NBQX20, 67.87 + 4.51%, Groups, F2, 22 = 0.0950, P = 0.9098; one-way ANOVA).
A two-way RM ANOVA revealed a lack of effect of Vehicle (Figure 3B; time × treatment: F22, 231 = 0.5102, P = 0.9681) and NBQX10 pre-treatment (Figure 3D; time × treatment: F22, 231 = 1.125, P = 0.3209) on the time course of AMPA-induced suppression of CA1 PS amplitude. In contrast, NBQX20 pre-treatment significantly attenuated the effect AMPA on PS amplitude (Figure 3F; time × treatment: F22, 264 = 1.873, P = 0.0117). Consistently, the AMPA-induced peak PS amplitude suppression was unaffected by Vehicle (Figure 3C; F2, 14 = 0.568, P = 0.589, one-way RM ANOVA) and NBQX10 pre-treatments (Figure 3E; F2, 14 = 3.408, P = 0.0623, one-way RM ANOVA). In contrast, NBQX20 pre-treatment attenuated the AMPA-induced peak PS amplitude suppression (Figure 3G; F2, 16 = 21.47, P < 0.0001, one-way RM ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test).
Robust theta activation was observed with A1 microinjections of AMPA across all experimental groups. The average duration of theta in the 10 min period after AMPA administration was similar (Vehicle, 36.42 + 2.29 s/min vs. NBQX10, 31.70 + 2.79 s/min vs. NBQX20, 38.57 + 2.95 s/min; F2, 22 = 1.672, P = 0.2109; one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test).
NBQX20, but not NBQX10 and Vehicle pre-treatment, prevented the robust increase in duration of theta (Figures 4A,C,E). In this context, two-way RM ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test was used to compare duration of theta wave activity in the 10 min period post-AMPA microinjection. The analysis revealed that pre-treatment with Vehicle or NBQX10 had no significant effect on duration of AMPA induced theta activity (Figures 4A,C; Vehicle; time × treatment: F22, 231 = 0.8856, P = 0.6141; NBQX10; time × treatment: F22, 231 = 0.7376, P = 0.7981). However, NBQX20 significantly attenuated duration of AMPA-induced theta (Figure 4E; NBQX20, time × treatment: F22, 264 = 3.760, P < 0.0001). Consistently, the AMPA-induced average theta duration was attenuated by NBQX20 but not by other pre-treatments (Figures 4B,D,F; Vehicle, F2, 14 = 1.780, P = 0.2047; NBQX10, F2, 14 = 3.638, P = 0.0534; NBQX20, F2, 16 = 19.01, P < 0.0001; one-way RM ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test).
Figure 4
Interestingly, the frequency and power of remaining theta following NBQX20 pre-treatment (NBQX20-A2) was no different from A1 AMPA-induced theta. Further, neither Vehicle nor NBQX10 pre-treatment attenuated AMPA-induced theta power and frequency. The corresponding statistics (one-way RM ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test) are as follows: (a) Vehicle pre-treatment (Supplementary Figures 2A,B) - theta frequency: F2, 14 = 0.665, P = 0.529; theta power: F2, 14 = 0.185, P = 0.832, (b) NBQX10 pre-treatments (Supplementary Figures 2C,D) - theta frequency: F2, 14 = 2.668, P = 0.104; theta power: F2, 14 = 1.303, P = 0.303, and (c) NBQX20 pre-treatment (Supplementary Figures 2E,F) - theta frequency: F2, 14 = 1.632, P = 0.227; theta power: F2, 14 = 0.587, P = 0.568. The observation, especially the lack of effect of NBQX20 on residual theta frequency and power suggests that such low level of residual theta activity was NBQX insensitive.
We next examined whether NBQX sensitive mechanism mediates, at least in part, the suppression and theta activation to intraseptal carbachol (0.156 μg/μl, 0.5 μl), a widely used pharmacological means of septal activation. Indeed, administration of carbachol into the MS has been previously shown to induce both a robust suppression of CA1 PS and theta activation (Zheng and Khanna, ). Furthermore, septal neurons that are recruited for theta rhythmogenesis are modulated by both cholinergic and glutamatergic inputs (Hajszan et al., ; Manseau et al., ).
The effect of NBQX20 was tested against carbachol-induced PS amplitude suppression at 25% or 75% of maximal amplitude. Comparison of the peak effect within the first 5 min of carbachol administration showed that NBQX20 did not affect the carbachol-induced suppression of 25% PS amplitude (Supplementary Figure 3A, F2, 5 = 0.769 P = 0.489, one-way RM ANOVA). In contrast, suppression of 75% PS amplitude by carbachol was blocked by NBQX20 (Supplementary Figure 3B, F2, 12 = 14.50, P = 0.0006, one-way RM ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls test).
Although the basal PS amplitudes were kept different, the spontaneous theta frequency and power of 25% and 75% PS groups were statistically similar (frequency: T11 = 0.593, P = 0.565; power: T11 = 1.671, P = 0.123; two-tail unpaired t-test). In addition, theta activation induced by first carbachol microinjection (C1) in both groups was also comparable (duration: T11 = 0.381, P = 0.710; frequency: T11 = 1.419, P = 0.184; power: T11 = 0.499, P = 0.628; two tail unpaired t-test). Therefore, the data for the two groups were combined for theta analysis. NBQX20 had a significant effect on carbachol-induced theta, attenuating all theta parameters (Supplementary Figures 3C–E; duration: F2, 24 = 12.15, P = 0.0002; frequency: F2, 24 = 7.162, P = 0.0036; power: F2, 24 = 6.518, P = 0.0055; one-way RM ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test). It is also notable that the effect on theta frequency and power was sustained (Supplementary Figures 3D,E).
Interestingly, carbachol (C1, n = 13) induced a more robust theta than AMPA (A1, n = 33) in untreated animals. The average theta duration induced by carbachol was significantly higher compared to that induced by AMPA (C1: 37.32 + 1.961 s vs. A1: 27.65 + 0.577 s; t18 = 4.733, P = 0.0002; two-tail unpaired t-test). Similarly, carbachol induced a higher theta frequency (C1: 4.619 + 0.157 Hz vs. A1: 3.78 + 0.0158 Hz; t18 = 5.306, P < 0.0001; two-tail unpaired t-test) and theta power (normalized to spontaneous theta power; C1: 1.190 + 0.031 vs. A1: 1.057 + 0.025; t18 = 3.406, P = 0.0032; two-tail unpaired t-test) than AMPA. These observations suggest that experiments with carbachol microinjection provided a greater width than intraseptal AMPA to explore changes in theta activation. Whereas the theta frequency induced on microinjection of AMPA was closer to the threshold that defines theta in anesthetized animals. Potentially, therefore, in experiments that examined the effect of NBQX20 on intraseptal AMPA-induced theta, an attenuation of theta frequency by NBQX may lead to loss of theta wave activity thus masking the effect of the antagonist on AMPA-induced theta generation.
While we did not examine the effect of intraseptal Vehicle (saline) on carbachol-induced responses, it is notable that Vehicle pre-treatment does not affect AMPA-induced responses, which are less intense, especially theta activation, than those evoked by carbachol. Thus, we anticipate that intraseptal Vehicle will not affect carbachol-induced responses. Therefore, we viewed the “Vehicle” control group in the AMPA study as a surrogate to Vehicle control in the experiments with carbachol.
Effect of Intraseptal Microinjection of Glutamate Antagonists on Behavior and Theta Activation in Novel Open Field
The previous experiments provided evidence that indirect and direct activation of the septo-hippocampal network via the septum occurs via an NBQX sensitive mechanism. In this experiment, we examined whether NBQX modulated hippocampal theta and animal behavior on exploration of the novel open field during which the septo-hippocampal network exhibits a robust activation. In separate experiments, Vehicle or NBQX (20 μg/μl) was microinjected into the MS 5 min or 15 min before exposure to the open field arena with the concurrent recording of field activity in the dorsal hippocampal field CA1 (Supplementary Figure 4). The time of NBQX pre-treatment was varied to determine whether the greater availability of the antagonist in MS with shorter pre-treatment would make a difference to the behavioral response over time.
For animals in the Vehicle 5 min and Vehicle 15 min pre-treatment groups, the ambulatory distance at 5 min (720.03 ± 120.17 vs. 520.03 + 68.35) and 20 min (199.1 ± 74.35 vs. 94.71 + 52.14) of the open field test was similar (two-tailed unpaired t-test; 5 min, t10 = 1.447, P = 0.1786; 20 min, t10 = 1.150, P = 0.2770). Likewise, the ambulatory speed, theta duration, FFT theta peak frequency, and FFT theta peak power was also comparable (5 min; t10 = 0.0879 at least, i.e., the least value seen among the different comparisons, P = 0.4178 at least; 20 min, t10 = 0.02768 at least, P = 0.2655 at least). Thus, Vehicle pre-treatment groups were grouped. Similarly, the corresponding parameters recorded in the open field were comparable between the NBQX 5 min or NBQX 15 min pre-treatment groups. Thus, these two groups were also combined.
The animals habituated with time resulting in decreasing exploratory behavior over time in both the Vehicle and NBQX20 pre-treatment groups (Figures 5A,B). Two-way RM ANOVA of the time courses of responses (Figures 5A–C,E) in open field showed that pre-treatment with NBQX20 did not affect ambulatory distance (time × treatment, F3, 75 = 1.209, P = 0.3125), ambulatory speed (time × treatment, F3, 75 = 0.7125, P = 0.5476), theta duration (time × treatment, F3, 75 = 1.924, P = 0.1329), and theta power (time × treatment, F3, 75 = 1.398, P = 0.2499). However, theta frequency was decreased with NBQX20 pre-treatment (Figure 5D; time × treatment, F3, 75 = 0.2378, P = 0.8691; treatment, F1, 25 = 15.25, P = 0.0006). Indeed, the average theta frequency in the 20 min test period was low in NBQX20 pre-treatment group vs. Vehicle pre-treatment group (6.400 + 0.1387 Hz vs. 7.094 + 0.096 Hz; T6 = 5.653, P = 0.0013, two-tail unpaired t-test).
Figure 5
Investigation of the Change in Septal Glutamate Release in the Formalin Test
The findings in the preceding section suggest that AMPA glutamatergic receptor mechanisms in MS modulate behavioral and electrophysiological indices in the novel open field. The septo-hippocampal network is known to mediate formalin nociception, the formalin test being a model of persistent inflammatory pain (Lee et al., ). However, the relative role of septal glutamatergic transmission in formalin-induced nociception, sensorimotor behaviors, and theta activation remains unclear. As a step towards exploring the role of septal glutamatergic receptor mechanisms in the formalin test, we used amperometric analysis to explore the change in glutamate levels within the MS in the formalin test. Glutamate levels were also examined in an open field test. The animals were habituated for three consecutive days to the experimental set up for the formalin test before the amperometric recordings on the day of the experiment. The recording electrodes were positioned in the MS (Figures 6A,B). A separate set of animals were implanted with null biosensors to record current drift that might have been due to the biosensor itself. All animals in this experiment follow the timeline as illustrated in Figure 6C.
Figure 6
Representative current traces recorded in-vivo from glutamate and null biosensor are shown in Figures 6D,E, respectively. The amperometric data was binned in blocks of 5 min. The average drift in the current recorded with the null biosensors (Figure 6F) was subtracted from the value recorded with the glutamate biosensors at the corresponding time block. The final extraction currents are shown in Figures 6G,H.
The change in glutamate current during exploration of an open field showed a trend towards an increase (Figure 6G). The increase, however, was marginally statistically insignificant as compared to its baseline (Figure 6G; F12, 72 = 1.882, P = 0.0511, one-way RM ANOVA). The total ambulatory distance covered by animals in 20 min of observation in the experiment was comparable to the total ambulation by Vehicle pre-treated animals exposed to a novel open field in Figure 5 (1056 ± 251.7 cm vs. 1248 ± 188.7 cm, T20 = 0.5537, P = 0.5859, two-tailed unpaired t-test).
In the formalin test, a gradual and sustained increase was observed with hind paw injection of formalin but not saline. A two-way RM ANOVA of the time course followed by Bonferroni post hoc test revealed a significant increase in glutamate current with formalin injection (Figure 6H, time × treatment: F12, 144 = 20.66, P < 0.0001, treatment: F1, 12 = 24.60, P = 0.0003). The increase in current was significant from the 20th min following injection of formalin. A Bonferroni post hoc test comparing the time points within each treatment group also revealed that the current post-formalin, but not saline injection was significantly higher than its corresponding baseline from 10th min onwards (Figure 6H). The estimated change in the glutamate concentration corresponding to the change in current recorded at selected 5 min time blocks is shown in Figure 6I. The increase was maximal at 40th min and declined subsequently (F3, 18 = 10.42, P = 0.0003; one-way RM ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test).
Here it is notable that nociceptive behaviors (i.e., flinching and licking of the injured paw) were not monitored in these experiments. Nonetheless, a biphasic increase in ambulatory distance and speed (distance: time × treatment, F22, 198 = 5.692, P < 0.0001, speed: time × treatment, F22, 198 = 4.147, P < 0.0001; Supplementary Figure 5) was observed on formalin injection which is typical of the formalin model (Lee et al., ). This biphasic response was not observed with hind paw injection of saline. Animals in the open field showed a peak in the ambulatory distance in the first 5 min followed by a gradual decline. It is interesting to note that formalin-induced ambulation (Supplementary Figure 5) declined towards baseline from 45th to 60th min, whereas the biosensor current remained elevated at a high level during that period (Figure 6H). Similarly, glutamate current continued to rise steadily during interphase with 1.25% FT where ambulatory and nociceptive behaviors are typically low. This suggests that the glutamate current reflects an accumulation of the neurotransmitter in the extracellular space over the course of the experiments rather than a moment-to-moment change in glutamatergic activity.
Effect of Intraseptal Microinjection of Glutamate Antagonists on Formalin-Induced Nociceptive Behaviors
In these experiments, the effect of intraseptal microinjection of NBQX (20 μg/μl, 0.5 μl; denoted as NBQX20) was investigated on formalin-induced nociceptive behaviors and theta activation. In addition, NBQX was also microinjected into the lateral septum (LS) in a separate group of animals to investigate the site-specificity of the effect on formalin-induced nociception.
After habituation, formalin (1.25%, 0.1 ml) was injected into the right hind paw of the animals. Unlike the experiment above, the animals received only one injection as the saline injection was omitted in this study. NBQX20 or Vehicle was microinjected into either the MS or LS. The microinjection was performed at either 5 or 15 min before formalin injection. A two-tail unpaired t-test analysis showed that animals pre-treated with Vehicle at either 5 or 15 min before formalin had comparable responses in both phases 1 and 2 of the formalin test (Flinching: Phase 1, t11 = 0.8488, P = 0.4141, Phase 2, t11 = 1.381, P = 0.1946; Licking: Phase 1, t11 = 0.6632, P = 0.5208, Phase 2, t11 = 1.696, P = 0.1179). Therefore, the two groups were combined. Similarly, the responses in animals microinjected with NBQX into the LS at the two pre-treatment times were also similar and combined (Flinching: Phase 1, t2 = 0.8544, P = 0.4829, Phase 2, t2 = 0.2791, P = 0.8064; Licking: Phase 1, t2 = 0.5481, P = 0.6386, Phase 2, t2 = 0.5305, P = 0.6488).
Microinjection of NBQX20 into the MS but not LS, 5 or 15 min before hind paw injection of formalin, significantly attenuated formalin-induced flinching (Figure 7A, time × treatment: F51, 544 = 67.50, P < 0.0001, treatment: F3, 32 = 33.42, P < 0.0001, two-way RM ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test), in Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the formalin test (Figure 7B, Phase 1: Groups: F3, 32 = 20.22, P < 0.0001, and Phase 2: Groups: F3, 32 = 26.15, P < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keul’s post hoc test). Interestingly, stronger suppression of flinching was observed in the NBQX20 MS 5 min group as compared to the NBQX20 MS 15 min group (Figure 7A). Similarly, a more prolonged decrease in formalin-induced licking was observed in the NBQX20 MS 5 min group (Figure 7C, time × treatment: F51, 544 = 1.894, P = 0.0003, treatment: F3, 32 = 3.923, P = 0.0172, two-way RM ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test). A decrease in formalin-induced licking behavior was observed in both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the NBQX20 MS 5 min group, while a decrease was observed only in Phase 1 with the NBQX20 MS 15 min group (Figure 7D, Phase 1 Groups: F3, 32 = 5.190, P = 0.005; Phase 2 Groups: F3, 32 = 5.30, P = 0.004, one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test).
Figure 7
NBQX microinjection into neither MS nor LS affected the time course of formalin-induced ambulatory distance and speed (Figures 7E and 7G, time × treatment: F51, 544 = 0.728, P = 0.921 and time × treatment: F51, 544 = 0.992, P = 0.493, respectively; two-way RM ANOVA). The two parameters were also similar in Phase 1 (ambulatory distance: Groups: F3, 32 = 0.024, P = 0.995; speed: Groups: F3, 32 = 1.532, P = 0.225) and Phase 2 (ambulatory distance: Groups: F3, 32 = 0.388, P = 0.762; speed: Groups: F3, 32 = 0.415, P = 0.744; one-way ANOVA) of the formalin test (Figures 7F and 7H).
In context of speed, the average speed in Phase 2 (68.88 + 12.56 cm/s, n = 9) of Vehicle pre-treated animals was less than Phase 1 (140.5 + 16.24 cm/s, n = 9; P = 0.010, two-tailed paired t-test). However, speed was registered in only two of the nine animals during interphase, the average speed in these animals being 90.86 cm/s (n = 2).
Effect of Intraseptal Microinjection of NBQX on Formalin-Induced Hippocampal Theta Wave Activity
The effect of intraseptal NBQX20 was also monitored on hippocampal theta wave activity recorded concomitantly with behavior during the formalin test. The hippocampal recording sites were in the stratum radiatum. Interestingly, the formalin-induced theta power was about half of that observed during exploration in a familiar environment (theta power ratio ~0.5, Figure 8G). In contrast, theta power induced during exploration in the novel open field, especially in the first 5 min was similar to that observed during exploration in a familiar environment (theta power ratio ~1.0, Figure 5E).
Figure 8
A robust biphasic increase in theta duration was observed in parallel with nociceptive behaviors following formalin hind paw injection (1.25%, 0.1 ml) in animals pre-treated with intraseptal vehicle (Figure 8A). A two-way RM ANOVA analysis showed a significant effect of intra-MS NBQX20 pre-treatment (5 or 15 min) on formalin-induced total theta duration as compared to Vehicle group (time × treatment: F51, 544 = 3.380, P < 0.0001, treatment: F3, 32 = 16.78, P < 0.0001). Microinjection into LS was not effective. Indeed, a phase analysis also showed that NBQX induced a significant decrease in cumulative total theta duration in both Phase 1 (Groups: F3, 32 = 10.78, P < 0.0001) and Phase 2 (Groups: F3, 32 = 21.30, P < 0.0001, Figure 8B) with microinjection into MS, but not LS.
The theta wave activity was separated into sensory related theta and residual theta activity. Sensory related theta activity is theta activity observed in parallel with formalin-induced flinching and licking of the injured hind paw. The residual theta wave activity reflects the activity recorded in periods marked by the absence of flinching and licking and includes theta wave activity which parallels formalin-induced ambulation. The theta activity was analyzed in blocks of 5 min that corresponded to the peaks of theta and nociceptive behaviors in Phase 1 (0–5 min or 5 min time point) and Phase 2 (16–20 min or 20 min time point), and the interphase which is the relatively quiescent period (6–10 min or 10 min time point) in the formalin test.
The duration of sensory related theta was biphasic with a significantly lower duration of theta at interphase as compared to Phase 1 and Phase 2 (Figure 8C, time × treatment: F6, 64 = 4.751, P = 0.0005, treatment: F3, 32 = 33.92, P < 0.0001, two-way RM ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test). NBQX20 significantly attenuated duration of sensory related theta at Phase 1 (Groups: F3, 32 = 9.873, P < 0.0001) and Phase 2 (Groups: F3, 32 = 32.98, P < 0.0001), but not interphase (Groups: F3, 32 = 2.36, P = 0.093, one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test, Figure 8D), when microinjected into MS, but not LS.
In contrast, the duration of residual theta on microinjection of NBQX into MS was similar to control across different phases within the different group, although the duration tended to be slightly higher at 20 min block in animal injected with NBQX into LS (Figure 9A, time × treatment: F6, 64 = 0.376, P = 0.891, treatment: F3, 32 = 8.507, P = 0.0003, two-way RM ANOVA). Indeed, one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test of the experimental groups indicated that the duration of residual theta wave activity observed with NBQX microinjection into MS was not different from the Vehicle microinjected group, although it was lower than the “NBQX20 LS combined” group (5 min: Groups: F3, 32 = 3.35, P = 0.031, 10 min: Groups: F3, 32 = 5.07, P = 0.006, and 20 min: Groups: F3, 32 = 4.01, P = 0.016, Figure 9B).
Figure 9
Interestingly, the FFT peak frequency of sensory theta showed a biphasic trend with a lower frequency at interphase in the control “Vehicle MS combined” and “NBQX20 LS combined” groups but not in the “NBQX20 MS 5 min” and “NBQX20 MS 15 min” groups (Figure 8E, time × treatment: F6, 64 = 0.194, P = 0.194, treatment: F3, 32 = 3.838, P = 0.019, two-way RM ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test). One-way ANOVA with Newman-Keuls post hoc analysis showed that microinjection of NBQX20 into MS significantly lowered theta frequency in Phase 1 (Groups: F3, 32 = 7.68, P = 0.0005) but not at interphase (Groups: F3, 32 = 0.588, P = 0.588) or Phase 2 (Groups: F3, 32 = 2.411, P = 0.085, Figure 8F).
Sensory related theta power was also invariant across different Phases within the different groups (Figure 8G, time × treatment: F6, 64 = 0.979, P = 0.447, treatment: F3, 32 = 1.656, P = 0.196, two-way RM ANOVA). One-way ANOVA analysis also showed that power was very similar across different groups in Phase 1 (Groups: F3, 32 = 1.365, P = 0.271), interphase (Groups: F3, 32 = 2.266, P = 0.099) and Phase 2 (Groups: F3, 32 = 0.44, P = 0.723, Figure 8H).
On the other hand, the FFT peak frequency of residual theta was also invariant across different phases within the different groups (Figure 9C, time × treatment: F6, 64 = 0.811, P = 0.566, treatment: F3, 32 = 4.870, P = 0.007, two-way RM ANOVA). Although, like sensory theta, NBQX microinjection into MS significantly attenuated residual theta frequency at Phase 1 (Groups: F3, 32 = 8.468, P = 0.0003) but not at interphase (Groups: F3, 32 = 1.945, P = 0.142), and Phase 2 (Groups: F3, 32 = 2.53, P = 0.074, one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test, Figure 9D). It is notable that the theta frequency also tended to be lower at interphase and Phase 2 in NBQX20 MS groups as compared to Vehicle treated group.
Although there is a trend towards an increase in FFT peak power of residual theta wave activity at 20 min compared to 10 min in the Vehicle treated group, this was not observed for the other treatment groups (Figure 9E, time × treatment: F6, 64 = 0.916, P = 0.489, treatment: F3, 32 = 0.662, P = 0.582, two-way RM ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test). One-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc analysis also showed that power was very similar among different groups in Phase 1 (Groups: F3, 32 = 0.189, P = 0.903), interphase (Groups: F3, 32 = 0.151, P = 0.929, and Phase 2 (Groups: F3, 32 = 0.191, P = 0.148, Figure 9F).
Collectively, the preceding findings highlight that the decrease in total theta duration with NBQX pre-treatment likely reflects the drug-induced decrease in sensory behavior-related theta, with decreases being in parallel with a decrease in nociceptive behavior. Whereas the duration of residual theta is unaffected which is consistent with the finding that NBQX pre-treatment does not attenuate non-sensory behaviors such as ambulation.
Discussion
The current study provides novel evidence that MS glutamatergic transmission at AMPAR modulates the frequency of hippocampal theta wave activity and nociceptive behaviors. An effect of NBQX on nociceptive behaviors has been reported before (Ariffin et al., ). In the dose administered, NBQX antagonized intraseptal AMPA-induced suppression of CA1 PS and theta activation. Further, in the context of theta, microinjection of NBQX into the MS but not LS reduced frequency of theta induced by different physiological and pharmacological means, namely: (a) reticular stimulation, (b) direct stimulation of MS with intraseptal microinjection of the cholinergic agonist, carbachol, (c) animal exploration of the novel environment and (d) nociceptive behavior. Across the different preparations, NBQX reduced the frequency by ~0.5–1 Hz. The effect of NBQX, being seen in both anesthetized and behaving animals, suggests that modulation of the frequency of theta wave activity is a function of AMPAR in MS.
In behaving animals, the effect of NBQX on theta frequency was observed during the period of observation in the novel open field and in Phase 1 of the formalin test which corresponds to the 1st 5 min after hind paw injection of formalin. However, NBQX did not affect frequency in Phase 2 of the formalin test. Notably, there is an element of novelty in Phase 1 due to injection of formalin, while Phase 2 is not novel per se but, instead, reflects a continuation of the nociceptive experience that is driven after a hiatus (i.e., interphase) by changes triggered by initial damage on injection in Phase 1 (Tai et al., ). Collectively, the preceding suggests that intraseptal AMPAR plays a role in theta generation during novelty. In contrast, AMPAR antagonist do not affect theta during exploration in a familiar environment (Leung and Shen, ). Also, of note here is that co-administration of antagonists at AMPAR and NMDAR into MS of behaving animal attenuates theta activation on optogenetic stimulation of septal glutamatergic neurons (Fuhrmann et al., ). However, the role of AMPAR alone remained undefined in that study.
Within group comparisons suggest that the lack of NBQX effect on theta frequency at interphase and Phase 2 of the formalin test was not due to a nociceptive overdrive. Thus, NBQX did not affect theta frequency at interphase which is marked by an ebb in nociceptive behaviors. Further, NBQX decreased nociceptive behaviors, both in Phase 1 and at peak of Phase 2 but did not affect theta frequency in Phase 2. The nociceptive behaviors at peak of Phase 2 were like that in Phase 1 in NBQX treated animals. The effect of NBQX on theta frequency was also not due to sedation. In this context, the effect of NBQX on frequency was observed both in the novel open field and in the formalin test without an effect on ambulation. Consistently, the average speed of ambulation was also not affected by NBQX.
However, we did not monitor moment-to-moment acceleration. Such acceleration, instead of speed, relates to instantaneous changes in the frequency of theta (Kropff et al., ). In contrast to instantaneous frequency, we measured average frequency over a period. Nonetheless, the selective effect of NBQX on the average frequency in the first phase of the formalin is also unlikely due to differences in opportunity to accelerate in that period vs. other time-points of the formalin test. Thus, for example, both the ambulatory distance and speed increased from a low at interphase to a high at peak of Phase 2, a period in which the animal is likely to accelerate often. In the novel open field, NBQX evoked a similar decrease in average frequency across different time points, although both ambulatory speed and distance decreased from a high in the first 5 min. Therefore, the findings broadly suggest that NBQX modulated changes in average theta frequency under the condition of novelty, though this does not discount the possibility that it may also modulate instantaneous frequency during epochs of acceleration.
On the contrary, intraseptal NBQX failed to affect the power of theta in behaving animals, even though the drug attenuated reticular stimulation-evoked and carbachol-induced power of theta in anesthetized animals. The lack of effect in behaving animals was regardless of the strength of theta power. NBQX was not only ineffective in the background of high power during the first 5 min of novel environment exploration but also during the later period of exploration when theta power was reduced to about 50% of that observed in the first 5 min. Similarly, NBQX failed to attenuate theta power in the formalin test, where it is about half of that observed during animal ambulation in a familiar environment.
In addition to its effect on hippocampal theta activity in anesthetized animals, AMPAR also influenced septal-mediated modulation of the CA1 pyramidal cell excitability evoked by afferent stimulation. Microinjection of NBQX in the MS attenuated the suppression of CA1 PS evoked by intraseptal carbachol. However, the effect of NBQX is relatively weak as the effect on the suppression is only seen using a 75% PS where the strength of carbachol-induced inhibition is reduced as compared to 25% PS. The same lack of effect was also observed with the suppression of 75% PS that was evoked with RPO stimulation at T V, which is a supra-maximal intensity for eliciting suppression (Jiang and Khanna, ). Together with the effect of NBQX on theta frequency and power, these findings suggest that intraseptal glutamate is involved in a spectrum of MS-mediated network responses.
Interestingly, the effect of intra-MS NBQX on nociceptive behaviors varied with the length of delay between the treatment and formalin injection. It was observed that NBQX had a stronger effect on nociceptive behavior when it was microinjected closer to the time of formalin injection. The greater behavioral efficacy with 5 min pre-treatment time likely reflects a greater septal availability of the antagonist over the time course of glutamate accumulation in MS, as shown by the amperometric analysis in the present study. Indeed, a gradual accumulation of extracellular glutamate was observed reaching a peak around 40th min after hind paw injection of formalin. The gradual nature of accumulation of glutamate and its dissipation suggests that the accumulation does not measure moment-to-moment changes in glutamatergic transmission in the formalin test.
Interestingly, both the carbachol- and RPO-induced suppression is mediated by septal cholinergic neurons (Zheng and Khanna, ). Furthermore, the septal cholinergic neurons are also implicated in nociception (Khanna and Sinclair, ; Zheng and Khanna, ; Aloisi et al., ; Jiang et al., ). These neurons, however, play a low-key role in theta generation in awake animal and sensorimotor behaviors (Leung, ; Bland, ; Buzsáki, ; Vandecasteele et al., ; Tsanov, ). This, then, raises the possibility that cholinergic neurons are a common target for septal AMPAR mediated changes in pyramidal cell excitability and modulation of nociception. Indeed, a relatively recent in vitro study also suggests that glutamatergic transmission at AMPAR can excite cholinergic neurons (Robinson et al., ). Modulation of frequency may involve the modulation of septal GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons, both of which are important in theta generation (Bender et al., ; Fuhrmann et al., ).
Besides AMPAR, the septal glutamate NMDAR also affects theta and behavior. For example, the glutamate NMDA receptors have been implicated in sensorimotor behavior and power of theta (Bland and Oddie, ; Bland, ; Ma et al., ; Ang et al., ; Bender et al., ; Robinson et al., ; Bortz and Grace, ). In the context of theta, intraseptal AP5, an antagonist at NMDAR, evoked a robust decrease in theta power under varied conditions, including on (a) exploration in a familiar environment (Leung and Shen, ) and (b) peripheral application of aversive/noxious stimuli (Bland et al., ). Taken together with current findings this suggests that intraseptal glutamatergic transmission at AMPAR cooperates with septal NMDAR in the modulation of range of septal functions, including different aspects of theta activation and septal modulated nociceptive and sensorimotor behaviors.
In conclusion, the present study shows that intraseptal glutamatergic transmission at AMPAR modulates a spectrum of physiological functions mediated by MS, including the generation of theta wave activity to novelty. However, the glutamatergic inputs that may be involved remain unclear. The MS is rich in glutamatergic neuropil and receives glutamatergic from a variety of CNS regions, including the supramammillary nucleus (Leranth and Kiss, ; Hajszan et al., ; Manseau et al., ; Fuhrmann et al., ; Ruan et al., ). Interestingly, the supramammillary nucleus not only modulates septo-hippocampal theta activation, including theta activity induced by noxious stimuli, but also influences arousal, sensorimotor behavior, and the regional neurons are excited on exposure to a novel environment (Wirtshafter et al., ; Pan and McNaughton, ; Kocsis and Kaminski, ; Ma and Leung, ; Ito et al., ; Ariffin et al., ; Pedersen et al., ). Furthermore, the septal glutamatergic neurons increase their activity during arousal (Fuhrmann et al., ; An et al., ). They may also contribute to the local glutamatergic transmission.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) National University of Singapore (NUS).
Author contributions
KI conducted all experiments and analyzed the data. KI and MA build the figures. KI and SK interpreted the data. KI, MA, and SK wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by a research grant awarded by the National Medical Research Council, Singapore, an award from “National University of Singapore, University Strategic Research (DPRT/944/09/14), and NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine Aspiration Fund (R-185-000-271-720)” and an award by “Ministry of Education, Singapore, under its MOE AcRF Tier 3 Award MOE2017-T3-1-002” to SK.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance provided by Dr. Lo Shun Qiang in the analysis of amperometric data using Matlab.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncir.2021.663633/full#supplementary-material.
References
1
AloisiA. M.CeccarelliI.CavallaroK.ScaramuzzinoA. (2002). 192 IgG-Saporin-Induced selective cholinergic denervation modifies formalin pain in male rats. Analgesia6, 19–25.
2
AnS.SunH.WuM.XieD.HuS. -W.DingH. -L.et al. (2021). Medial septum glutamatergic neurons control wakefulness through a septo-hypothalamic circuit. Curr. Biol.31, 1379–1392.e1374.10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.019
3
AngS. T.AriffinM. Z.KhannaS. (2017). The forebrain medial septal region and nociception. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem.138, 238–251. 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.07.017
4
AngS. T.LeeA. T. H.FooF. C.NgL.LowC. M.KhannaS. (2015). GABAergic neurons of the medial septum play a nodal role in facilitation of nociception-induced affect. Sci. Rep.5:15419. 10.1038/srep15419
5
AriffinM.JiangR.LowC.KhannaS. (2010). Nicotinic receptor mechanism in supramammillary nucleus mediates physiological regulation of neural activity in dorsal hippocampal field CA1 of anaesthetized rat. Hippocampus20, 852–865. 10.1002/hipo.20687
6
AriffinM. Z.IbrahimK. M.LeeA. T. -H.LeeR. Z.PoonS. Y.ThongH. K.et al. (2018). Forebrain medial septum sustains experimental neuropathic pain. Sci. Rep.8:11892. 10.1038/s41598-018-30177-3
7
ArmstrongJ. N.MacVicarB. A. (2001). Theta-frequency facilitation of AMPA receptor-mediated synaptic currents in the principal cells of the medial septum. J. Neurophysiol.85, 1709–1718. 10.1152/jn.2001.85.4.1709
8
BarthA. M.DomonkosA.Fernandez-RuizA.FreundT. F.VargaV. (2018). Hippocampal network dynamics during rearing episodes. Cell Rep.23:1706. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.021
9
BenderF.GorbatiM.CadaviecoM. C.DenisovaN.GaoX.HolmanC.et al. (2015). Theta oscillations regulate the speed of locomotion via a hippocampus to lateral septum pathway. Nat. Commun.6:8521. 10.1038/ncomms9521
10
BlandB.BirdJ.JacksonJ.NatsumeK. (2006). Medial septal modulation of the ascending brainstem hippocampal synchronizing pathways in the freely moving rat. Hippocampus16, 11–19. 10.1002/hipo.20136
11
BlandB.OddieS. (2001). Theta band oscillation and synchrony in the hippocampal formation and associated structures: the case for its role in sensorimotor integration. Behav. Brain Res.127, 119–136. 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00358-8
12
BlandB. H. (1986). The physiology and pharmacology of hippocampal formation theta rhythms. Prog. Neurobiol.26, 1–54. 10.1016/0301-0082(86)90019-5
13
BlandB. H. (2009). “Chapter 12 - Anatomical, physiological and pharmacological properties underlying hippocampal sensorimotor integration,” in Information Processing by Neuronal Populations, eds HolscherC.MunkM. (United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press).
14
BlandB. H.DeclerckS.JacksonJ.GlasgowS.OddieS. (2007). Septohippocampal properties of N-methyl-D-aspartate-induced theta-band oscillation and synchrony. Synapse61, 185–197. 10.1002/syn.20357
15
BortzD. M.GraceA. A. (2018). Medial septum differentially regulates dopamine neuron activity in the rat ventral tegmental area and substantia nigra via distinct pathways. Neuropsychopharmacology43, 2093–2100. 10.1038/s41386-018-0048-2
16
BuzsákiG. (2002). Theta oscillations in the hippocampus. Neuron33, 325–340. 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00586-x
17
Elvander-TottieE.ErikssonT. M.SandinJ.OgrenS. O. (2006). N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the medial septal area have a role in spatial and emotional learning in the rat. Neuroscience142, 963–978. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.07.043
18
FuhrmannF.JustusD.SosulinaL.KanekoH.BeutelT.FriedrichsD.et al. (2015). Locomotion, Theta oscillations and the speed-correlated firing of hippocampal neurons are controlled by a medial septal glutamatergic circuit. Neuron86, 1253–1264. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.001
19
GivensB. S.OltonD. S. (1990). Cholinergic and GABAergic modulation of medial septal area: effect on working memory. Behav. Neurosci.104, 849–855. 10.1037//0735-7044.104.6.849
20
GrayJ. A. (1982). Précis of The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Behav. Brain Sci.5, 469–484. 10.1017/s0140525x00013066
21
GrayJ. A.McNaughtonN. (2000). The Neurophysiology of Anxiety An Enquiry into the Functions of the Septo-Hippocampal System, Second Edition. (United Kingdom: Oxford University Press).
22
HajszanT.AlrejaM.LeranthC. (2004). Intrinsic vesicular glutamate transporter 2-immunoreactive input to septohippocampal parvalbumin-containing neurons: novel glutamatergic local circuit cells. Hippocampus14, 499–509. 10.1002/hipo.10195
23
ItoM.ShiraoT.DoyaK.SekinoY. (2009). Three-dimensional distribution of Fos-positive neurons in the supramammillary nucleus of the rat exposed to novel environment. Neurosci. Res.64, 397–402. 10.1016/j.neures.2009.04.013
24
JiangF.KhannaS. (2004). Reticular stimulation evokes suppression of CA1 synaptic responses and generation of theta through separate mechanisms. Eur. J. Neurosci.19, 295–308. 10.1111/j.0953-816x.2003.03127.x
25
JiangF.KhannaS. (2006). Microinjection of carbachol in the supramammillary region suppresses CA1 pyramidal cell synaptic excitability. Hippocampus16, 891–905. 10.1002/hipo.20219
26
JiangY. -Y.ShaoS.ZhangY.ZhengJ.ChenX.CuiS.et al. (2018). Neural pathways in medial septal cholinergic modulation of chronic pain: distinct contribution of the anterior cingulate cortex and ventral hippocampus. Pain159, 1550–1561. 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001240
27
KhannaS. (1997). Dorsal hippocampus field CA1 pyramidal cell responses to a persistent versus an acute nociceptive stimulus and their septal modulation. Neuroscience77, 713–721. 10.1016/s0306-4522(96)00456-3
28
KhannaS.SinclairJ. G. (1992). Responses in the CA1 region of the rat hippocampus to a noxious stimulus. Exp. Neurol.117, 28–35. 10.1016/0014-4886(92)90107-2
29
KocsisB.KaminskiM. (2006). Dynamic changes in the direction of the theta rhythmic drive between supramammillary nucleus and the septohippocampal system. Hippocampus16, 531–540. 10.1002/hipo.20180
30
KropffE.CarmichaelJ. E.MoserE. I.MoserM. -B. (2021). Frequency of theta rhythm is controlled by acceleration, but not speed, in running rats. Neuron109, e8.1029–e8.1039.10.1002/hipo.20180
31
LeeA. T. -H.AriffinM. Z.ZhouM.YeJ. Z.MoochhalaS. M.KhannaS. (2011). Forebrain medial septum region facilitates nociception in a rat formalin model of inflammatory pain. Pain152, 2528–2542. 10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.019
32
LeranthC.KissJ. (1996). A population of supramammillary area calretinin neurons terminating on medial septum area cholinergic and lateral septum area calbindin-containing cells are aspartate/glutamatergic. J. Neurosci.16, 7699–7710. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-23-07699.1996
33
LeungL. S.ShenB. (2004). Glutamatergic synaptic transmission participates in generating the hippocampal EEG. Hippocampus14, 510–525. 10.1002/hipo.10199
34
LeungL. S. (1984). Theta rhythm during REM sleep and waking: Correlations between power, phase and fequency. Electroencephalogr Clin. Neurophysiol.58, 553–564. 10.1016/0013-4694(84)90045-2
35
MaJ.LeungL. S. (2007). The supramammillo-septal-hippocampal pathway mediates sensorimotor gating impairment and hyperlocomotion induced by MK-801 and ketamine in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl)191, 961–974. 10.1007/s00213-006-0667-x
36
MaJ.ShenB.StewartL. S.HerrickI. A.LeungL. S. (2002). The septohippocampal system participates in general anesthesia. J. Neurosci.22:RC200. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-02-j0004.2002
37
MaJ.TaiS. K.LeungL. S. (2012). Septohippocampal GABAergic neurons mediate the altered behaviors induced by n-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists. Hippocampus22, 2208–2218. 10.1002/hipo.22039
38
ManseauF.DanikM.WilliamsS. (2005). A functional glutamatergic neurone network in the medial septum and diagonal band area. J. Physiol.566, 865–884. 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.089664
39
McFarlandW. L.TeitelbaumH.HedgesE. K. (1975). Relationship between hippocampal theta activity and running speed in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.88, 324–328. 10.1037/h0076177
40
McNaughtonN.CorrP. J. (2004). A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: fear/anxiety and defensive distance. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.28, 285–305. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.005
41
McNaughtonN.RuanM.WoodnorthM. A. (2006). Restoring theta-like rhythmicity in rats restores initial learning in the Morris water maze. Hippocampus16, 1102–1110. 10.1002/hipo.20235
42
NagaharaA. H.McGaughJ. L. (1992). Muscimol infused into the medial septal area impairs long-term memory but not short-term memory in inhibitory avoidance, water maze place learning and rewarded alternation tasks. Brain Res.591, 54–61. 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90977-h
43
PanW. X.McNaughtonN. (2004). The supramammillary area: its organization, functions and relationship to the hippocampus. Prog. Neurobiol.74, 127–166. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.09.003
44
PaxinosG.WatsonC. (2014). Paxinos and Watson’s The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, 7th Edition. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.
45
PedersenN. P.FerrariL.VennerA.WangJ. L.AbbottS. B. G.VujovicN.et al. (2017). Supramammillary glutamate neurons are a key node of the arousal system. Nat. Commun.8:1405. 10.1038/s41467-017-01004-6
46
RobinsonJ.ManseauF.DucharmeG.AmilhonB.VigneaultE.El MestikawyS.et al. (2016). Optogenetic activation of septal glutamatergic neurons drive hippocampal theta rhythms. J. Neurosci.36, 3016–3023. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2141-15.2016
47
RuanM.YoungC. K.McNaughtonN. (2017). Bi-Directional theta modulation between the septo-hippocampal system and the mammillary area in free-moving rats. Front. Neural Circuits11:62. 10.3389/fncir.2017.00062
48
ShinJ.GireeshG.KimS. W.KimD. S.LeeS.KimY. S.et al. (2009). Phospholipase C beta 4 in the medial septum controls cholinergic theta oscillations and anxiety behaviors. J. Neurosci.29, 15375–15385. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3126-09.2009
49
TaiS.HuangF.MoochhalaS.KhannaS. (2006). Hippocampal theta state in relation to formalin nociception. Pain121, 29–42. 10.1016/j.pain.2005.11.016
50
TsanovM. (2017). Differential and complementary roles of medial and lateral septum in the orchestration of limbic oscillations and signal integration. Eur. J. Neurosci.. 48, 2783–2794. 10.1111/ejn.13746
51
VandecasteeleM.VargaV.BerenyiA.PappE.BarthoP.VenanceL.et al. (2014). Optogenetic activation of septal cholinergic neurons suppresses sharp wave ripples and enhances theta oscillations in the hippocampus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A111, 13535–13540. 10.1073/pnas.1411233111
52
WakabayashiK. T.KiyatkinE. A. (2012). Rapid changes in extracellular glutamate induced by natural arousing stimuli and intravenous cocaine in the nucleus accumbens shell and core. J. Neurophysiol.108, 285–299. 10.1152/jn.01167.2011
53
WangY.RomaniS.LustigB.LeonardoA.PastalkovaE. (2015). Theta sequences are essential for internally generated hippocampal firing fields. Nat. Neurosci.18, 282–288. 10.1038/nn.3904
54
WinsonJ. (1978). Loss of hippocampal theta rhythm results in spatial memory deficit in the rat. Science201, 160–163. 10.1126/science.663646
55
WirtshafterD.StratfordT. R.ShimI. (1998). Placement in a novel environment induces fos-like immunoreactivity in supramammillary cells projecting to the hippocampus and midbrain. Brain Res.789, 331–334. 10.1016/s0006-8993(97)01555-2
56
ZhengF.KhannaS. (2001). Selective destruction of medial septal cholinergic neurons attenuates pyramidal cell suppression, but not excitation in dorsal hippocampus field CA1 induced by subcutaneous injection of formalin. Neuroscience103, 985–998. 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00006-9
57
ZimmermannM. (1983). Ethical guidelines for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animals. Pain16, 109–110. 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90201-4
Summary
Keywords
medial septum, AMPA receptors, NBQX, sensorimotor, theta activity, nociception
Citation
Ibrahim KM, Ariffin MZ and Khanna S (2021) Modulation of Septo-Hippocampal Neural Responses in Anesthetized and Behaving Rats by Septal AMPA Receptor Mechanisms. Front. Neural Circuit 15:663633. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2021.663633
Received
03 February 2021
Accepted
06 May 2021
Published
04 June 2021
Volume
15 - 2021
Edited by
Viktor Varga, Institute of Experimental Medicine (MTA), Hungary
Reviewed by
Manuel Valero, New York University, United States; Marco Mainardi, National Research Council (CNR), Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Ibrahim, Ariffin and Khanna.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sanjay Khanna phsks@nus.edu.sgsanjay_khanna@nuhs.edu.sg
†Present address: Khairunisa Mohamad Ibrahim, Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University Pain Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.