Abstract
The thalamic nuclear complex contains excitatory projection neurons and inhibitory local neurons, the two cell types driving the main circuits in sensory nuclei. While excitatory neurons are born from progenitors that reside in the proliferative zone of the developing thalamus, inhibitory local neurons are born outside the thalamus and they migrate there during development. In addition to these cell types, which occupy most of the thalamus, there are two small thalamic regions where inhibitory neurons target extra-thalamic regions rather than neighboring neurons, the intergeniculate leaflet and the parahabenular nucleus. Like excitatory thalamic neurons, these inhibitory neurons are derived from progenitors residing in the developing thalamus. The assembly of these circuits follows fine-tuned genetic programs and it is coordinated by extrinsic factors that help the cells find their location, associate with thalamic partners, and establish connections with their corresponding extra-thalamic inputs and outputs. In this review, we bring together what is currently known about the development of the excitatory and inhibitory components of the thalamocortical sensory system, in particular focusing on the visual pathway and thalamic interneurons in mice.
Introduction
The thalamus has classically been considered a relay station in the brain due to its central location and patterns of connectivity. Excitatory neurons in sensory nuclei receive ascending information from peripheral organs and they project their axons beyond the thalamus, mainly into the sensory cortices and avoiding intrinsic connections (Petersen, 2007; Huberman et al., 2008; Tsukano et al., 2017). As the vast majority of cells in sensory nuclei are excitatory neurons, the thalamus could be considered to be merely a relay station of sensory information, transferring messages from the periphery to the cortex. However, there is an increasing body of evidence demonstrating a key role of thalamic nuclei in processing information and gating messages to the cortex. In addition to the ascending sensory information, excitatory neurons integrate signals from other brain structures and from the intrinsic thalamic networks. GABAergic neurons represent an important element in these intrinsic networks and despite their small number, the GABAergic neurons in the interconnected networks shape the output of the sensory thalamus (Hirsch et al., 2015).
Thalamic circuits develop progressively in embryonic stages and they finally assemble during postnatal life (Jhaveri et al., 1991; Schlaggar and O’Leary, 1994). Excitatory neurons are born in the ventricular zone of the developing thalamus, thereafter migrating toward the mantle zone where they start to extend dendrites and axons. Along their route toward the cortex, the axons of excitatory neurons project through different brain territories, bundling into fascicules, branching and making synaptic connections (Crowley and Katz, 2000; Hannan et al., 2001; Hevner et al., 2002; López-Bendito and Molnár, 2003; Gurung and Fritzsch, 2004; Hensch, 2004; Pfeiffenberger et al., 2005; Miko et al., 2008; Hanganu-Opatz, 2010). By contrast, the spatiotemporal developmental trajectory of local GABAergic neurons differs considerably. These GABAergic neurons are not derived from thalamic progenitors but rather, they are born and migrate from neighboring midbrain and pre-thalamic domains, invading the thalamus and integrating into its circuits some time after excitatory neurons. In this review, we bring together what is currently known about the development of the excitatory and inhibitory components of the thalamocortical sensory system, focusing particularly on the visual pathway and on thalamic interneurons in mice.
The functional organization of the sensory thalamus
Thalamic neurons are organized into spatial clusters or nuclei that can be characterized through the subcortical origin of their afferents. Some of these afferents carry sensory information derived from peripheral organs, which adopt a modal organization to define the primary sensory nuclei of the thalamus: the dorsolateral geniculate nucleus (dLG) that receives visual information; the ventral posteromedial nucleus (VPM) for somatosensory input; and the ventral medial geniculate nucleus (MGv) for auditory input. While the dLG, VPM and MGv are classified as first-order (FO) nuclei since their main driving stimuli arrive directly or indirectly from the peripheral sensory organs (Sherman, 2017; Halassa and Sherman, 2019), the thalamus also contains higher-order (HO) nuclei that receive driving inputs from subpopulations of projection neurons in Layer 5b (L5b) of the respective cortical areas (Sherman and Guillery, 2002; ). HO nuclei mainly process unimodal information, even though they can integrate inputs from other modalities too. Among the HO nuclei, the lateral posterior nucleus (LP, visual), posterior medial (PoM, somatosensory), and the dorsal medial geniculate nucleus (MGd, auditory) not only further process sensory information but they also help the thalamus to connect different cortical areas (Figure 1; ; Halassa and Sherman, 2019).
FIGURE 1
The patterns of connectivity between the thalamus and cortex are similar for the different sensory modalities. Thus, sensory stimuli ascending from the peripheral organ arrives at the corresponding FO nucleus, which in turn projects to the L4, L5b, and L6 of the corresponding sensory cortex (Swadlow and Alonso, 2017). Within a cortical column, information flows from L4 to L2/3 and from there to L5 and L6, the layers that project out of the cortex. Neurons from L5b and L6b send projections to HO nuclei, and neurons in L6a project back to the FO nuclei (Sumser et al., 2017; Hoerder-Suabedissen et al., 2018). Therefore, these connections form feedback and feedforward loops that establish the basis of sensory processing in the thalamocortical system (Viaene et al., 2011). As a result, the thalamus represents a hub that can send information to and from different cortical areas (Sherman and Guillery, 2002; Reichova and Sherman, 2004; Lee and Murray Sherman, 2010; Theyel et al., 2010).
The formation of the thalamocortical system
Patterning of the diencephalon
Early in development, the diencephalon subdivides into three transverse regions called prosomeres, each of which can be further subdivided into four longitudinal bands or plates: roof, alar, basal, and floor (in a dorsoventral order, Figure 2A). This percolation relies on the presence of gradients of diffusible molecules, such as the wingless-INT proteins (WNTs), bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), Sonic hedgehog (SHH), and fibroblast growth factor proteins (FGFs) (Kataoka and Shimogori, 2008; Martinez-Ferre and Martinez, 2009, 2012). Prosomeres are evident at E10 in mice and their respective alar plates develop into different brain structures: prosomere 1 gives rise to the pretectum, which includes multiple domains of the adult brain that are involved in processing visual information and in the execution of visual reflexes (Ferran et al., 2009); prosomere 2 develops into the epithalamus and thalamus; and lastly, prosomere 3 gives rise to the prethalamus, which includes GABAergic structures like the reticular nucleus (RTN) and the zona incerta (ZI) (Puelles and Rubenstein, 2003).
FIGURE 2
Prosomeres 2 and 3 are separated by the zona limitans intrathalamica (ZLI), an organization center that expresses high levels of SHH. During the early percolation of the diencephalon, SHH is a fundamental signaling molecule in prosomere 2 because it steers the differentiation of the prospective thalamus from the epithalamus (; ; Mallika et al., 2015). In the prospective thalamus, two progenitor zones are established by E10.5 in the mouse (Figure 2B): the rostral and the caudal progenitor domains (Jeong et al., 2011; Suzuki-Hirano et al., 2011). The progenitors in the rostral domain are exposed to higher concentrations of SHH and consequently, they express markers like Olig3, Nkx2.2, Ascl1, and Olig2 (Scholpp et al., 2009). On the other hand, the progenitors in the caudal domain are exposed to less SHH, such that they express markers like Olig3, Ngn1/2, and Dbx1 (Figure 2C; ; Hashimoto-Torii et al., 2003; Kiecker and Lumsden, 2004; Scholpp et al., 2006; Szabó et al., 2009; Vue et al., 2009). Neurogenesis in these progenitor domains spans approximately from E10 to E13 (Wong et al., 2018) and the postmitotic progeny differentiate into two broad different cell types: the caudal domain differentiates into the glutamatergic projection neurons that populate the thalamic nuclei and form thalamocortical connections (Tou et al., 2007; Price et al., 2012), and the rostral domain differentiates into GABAergic projection neurons that populate the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) and the perihabenular nucleus (pHB) (Delogu et al., 2012; Fernandez et al., 2018).
As most neurons in the adult thalamus derive from the caudal progenitor domain, they must undergo a complex process of specification to generate neuronal diversity and the distinct thalamic nuclei. Although it is not clear how this diversification occurs, some evidence indicates that the population of caudal progenitors is heterogeneous. Within this caudal progenitor domain, there are transcription factors that are expressed in opposite gradients through the antero-ventral to caudo-dorsal axis. For instance, the expression of Olig2 is high at the most anterior pole and the expression of Dbx1 in the most caudal pole. This polarization of the caudal progenitor domain has relevant implications for thalamic nucleogenesis. Lineage and birth-dating analysis demonstrated that antero-ventral progenitors give rise to neurons populating more latero-ventral nuclei, and caudo-dorsal progenitors to more medio-dorsal ones (Tou et al., 2007; Wong et al., 2018). In addition, to this spatial order, there is also a temporal sequence whereby the formation of the latero-ventral nuclei occurs earlier than the medio-dorsal nuclei, which is consistent with the earlier transition from symmetric to asymmetric division in the antero-ventral compared to the caudo-dorsal progenitors (Nakagawa and Shimogori, 2012; Wong et al., 2018).
If different subpopulations of progenitors give rise to diverse cell types populating thalamic nuclei, it is expected that they are controlled by different genetic programs. However, data from single-cell RNA sequencing of E12 mice suggests that the progenitors in the ventricular zone of the caudal domain (apical progenitors) comprises a unique cluster of cells based on their transcriptomic profile. There is, indeed, a second cluster of dividing cells that derives from the apical progenitors and corresponds to the basal (or intermediate) progenitors of the thalamus located away from the ventricular zone (Guo and Li, 2019). Apical progenitors generate larger clones than basal progenitors, 12 neurons on average, and both apical or basal-derived clones tend to occupy more than one nucleus (Wong et al., 2018). It has been suggested that sibling cells tend to occupy functionally related nuclei but further evidence is needed (Shi et al., 2017). Despite transcriptomic analysis does not reveal clear-cut internal subdivisions of progenitor domains, they do show a graded pattern of gene expression (Guo and Li, 2019), as previously observed in data obtained using labeling methods (Tou et al., 2007). In sum, to refine the classification of the apparently heterogeneous populations of progenitors in the caudal domain of the thalamus, it is necessary to generate larger databases of single-cell transcriptomic profiles, accompanied by more complete atlases of gene expression and sophisticated algorithms.
Although the projection neurons of thalamic nuclei are born in the caudal proliferative domain, it remains unclear whether their nucleus-specific identity is specified at the progenitor stage (). Rather, current evidence suggests that nucleus-specific identity is conferred when progenitors exit the cell-cycle. The gradual expression of the Gbx2 transcription factor by post-mitotic cells is one determinant of thalamic nuclei that project to the cortex (Figure 3B). The expression of Gbx2 starts at E9.5, following a very dynamic spatiotemporal pattern that ultimately defines the borders of the thalamus with the epithalamus, prethalamus and pretectum, as well as parcellating the thalamus into distinct nuclei (Nakagawa and O’Leary, 2001; Tou et al., 2007; ; Li et al., 2012). The absence of Gbx2 leads to a shrinking of the thalamus at its posterior and dorsal borders, enlarging the pretectum and epithalamus, respectively. In turn, there is a disruption in the histogenesis of the nuclear complexes and a significant loss of thalamocortical projections (; ; Mallika et al., 2015; Nakagawa, 2019).
FIGURE 3
The development of thalamocortical projections
In the developing mouse thalamus, prospective thalamocortical cells begin to extend their axons toward the cortex at around E12, shortly after neurogenesis ceases (Figure 4). Growing thalamocortical axons are guided through different territories by molecular and cellular cues, as well as by activity-dependent mechanisms (Marcos-Mondéjar et al., 2012; Mire et al., 2012; Molnár et al., 2012; Leyva-Díaz et al., 2014; ). Thalamocortical axons start their journey toward the cortex by growing rostrally through the thalamus and heading toward the prethalamus. They navigate through the thalamic territory using prethalamic axons as scaffolds and following gradients of guidance cues, such as Sema3a and Netrin1 (Quintana-Urzainqui et al., 2020). Thalamocortical axons traverse the entire prethalamus and move through the Slit-free domain of the peduncular hypothalamus until they encounter the diencephalic-telencephalic boundary (DTB) (). Slit proteins guide thalamocortical axons out of the hypothalamus and they prevent them from crossing the midline (; López-Bendito et al., 2007; ; ). Subsequently, thalamocortical axons cross the DTB, attracted by Netrin1, and they enter the ventral telencephalon (Métin and Godement, 1996; ).
FIGURE 4
Thalamic projections continue their journey through the telencephalon, reaching the internal capsule from where they follow a permissive corridor formed between two repulsive areas: the proliferative zone of the medial ganglionic eminence (MGE) and the globus pallidus. A large proportion of these corridor cells are GABAergic neurons derived from the lateral ganglionic eminence (LGE), cells that express membrane-bound Neuregulin1 and that migrate into the mantle of the MGE between E11-E14 (López-Bendito et al., 2006; ). The topographic organization of thalamocortical axons is preserved throughout the ventral telencephalon, which is a result of complex interactions between cues like Netrin1, Sema3a/3f, Slit1, L1 cell-adhesion molecules and ephrinA5 (Dufour et al., 2003; Seibt et al., 2003; Mire et al., 2012; Leyva-Díaz et al., 2014; ).
By E14, thalamocortical axons meet corticofugal axons at the pallial-subpallial boundary (PSPB), and they use them as scaffolds to turn into the pallium and spread across the developing cortex (McConnell et al., 1989; ; de Carlos and O’Leary, 1992). The timing of the arrival of thalamic axons is relevant for cortical development. As thalamic inputs arrive at a rather immature cortex, they can exert a major effect on ongoing processes such as neurogenesis, migration and differentiation (). Thalamocortical axons start to invade the cortical plate at E17 when the granular layers are being formed (; del Río et al., 2000; Molyneaux et al., 2007; Little et al., 2009), and they finally reach their destination during the first postnatal week (Figure 4), mainly targeting neurons in L4 and to a lesser extent, neurons in L5b (López-Bendito and Molnár, 2003).
While invading the cortical plate, thalamic axons form functional synapses with subplate cells, a transient layer of rather mature neurons located below the cortical plate that coordinate the early maturation of thalamocortical networks (Kanold and Luhmann, 2010; Hoerder-Suabedissen and Molnár, 2015). As Cajal-Retzius cells, another transient population of cortical neurons, subplate neurons disappear by programmed cells death during the first postnatal days in mouse and thalamocortical afferents form direct contacts with neurons in L4 and deeper layers. Apart from subplate neurons, thalamocortical afferents form transient circuits with a specific subpopulation of developing interneruons. During the first postnatal week in mice, thalamocortical axons contact L5 somatostatin-positive interneurons that in turn contact spiny stellate neurons in layer 4 (Marques-Smith et al., 2016). This circuit becomes remodeled and disappears by the end of the first postnatal week. Despite its brief duration, the connection between L5 somatostatin-positive interneurons and L4 neurons orchestrates the assembly of local inhibition in layers 4. Also the density of thalamocortical input to infragranular interneurons varies during development. Somatostatin-positive interneurons receive a transient strong thalamic drive at immature stages that is required for the correct assembly of thalamic feed-forward inhibition mediated by parvalbumin-positive interneurons (Tuncdemir et al., 2016).
The development of corticothalamic projections
In mice, corticothalamic projections appear at E10 from post-mitotic neurons in the cortical plate. These corticofugal projections navigate laterally through the intermediate zone until they reach the PSPB between E13 and E15 (Jacobs et al., 2007). At this boundary, corticothalamic axons interact with the ascending thalamocortical axons, facilitating their invasion of the cortical territory. The corticothalamic axons then continue their journey through the ventral telencephalon toward the internal capsule, where molecular cues and corridor cells guide them toward the diencephalon (; López-Bendito et al., 2006, 2007). By E15, corticothalamic axons have crossed the DTB to enter into the prethalamus, where more-or-less a day later they interact with cells from the RTN and the perireticular nucleus (PRN) (Garel and Rubenstein, 2004; Molnár et al., 2012; Deck et al., 2013). These axons are sorted in the prethalamus and the majority of axons from L5 are directed toward the cerebral peduncle, while axons from L6 and the remaining axons from L5 are directed toward their thalamic targets (; Molnár and Cordery, 1999; Jacobs et al., 2007). Mouse corticothalamic axons invade the thalamus just prior birth (Figure 4), first entering the developing somatosensory nuclei, and then invading the auditory and visual nuclei, which are fully innervated by the end of the first postnatal week (Jacobs et al., 2007; Grant et al., 2012). However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms that guide the entry of corticothalamic axons into the thalamus remain poorly understood. Nevertheless, removal of retinal input alters corticothalamic innervation of the dLGN, inducing premature entry of L6 axons and an abnormal cross-hierarchical invasion of L5 axons that would otherwise be designated to the LP (; Grant et al., 2016; Moreno-Juan et al., 2022).
Early thalamic inputs affect cortical development and specification
The thalamus and cortex develop at a relatively similar pace and consequently they may influence each other’s maturation. The thalamus clearly affects many aspects of cortical development, such as the radial organization, cell proliferation, specification of cortical areas, navigation of corticothalamic axons, interneuron maturation and circuit assembly (Rakic, 1991; Dehay et al., 1996; Zechel et al., 2016). More specifically, glutamate released by thalamocortical axons is required for Reelin-expressing cortical interneurons to develop (de Marco García et al., 2015). Similarly, thalamic inputs regulate the integration of somatostatin- and parvalbumin-expressing interneurons into cortical circuits (Wamsley and Fishell, 2017), and the segregation of pyramidal neurons in the L4 of the barrel cortex (Li et al., 2013; ). Thalamic input also affects cell identity in the cortex, since differentiation into primary or higher-order cortical areas relies on the arrival of thalamocortical axons (). Indeed, when FO nuclei are removed genetically, primary sensory areas acquire the molecular and functional properties of secondary cortical areas (; Vue et al., 2013; Pouchelon et al., 2014). Recently, somatostatin-expressing interneurons in the cortex were seen to be necessary for the correct arrival of thalamocortical inputs onto parvalbumin-expressing interneurons and pyramidal neurons during the first week of postnatal life in mice (de Marco García et al., 2015; Marques-Smith et al., 2016; Tuncdemir et al., 2016; ; Takesian et al., 2018).
Neuronal transmission in the thalamocortical system can also influence the development of the cortex, as seen when normal synaptic transmission is disrupted in knock-out mice that lack key synaptic proteins, such as NMDA receptor 1, adenylyl cyclase 1, or metabotropic glutamate receptor 5. Such disruption of neurotransmission can provoke a lack of neuronal organization and smaller barrels with blurry borders in S1 (Iwasato et al., 2000; Datwani et al., 2002; ; ).
Spontaneous activity in the developing thalamus
Neuronal activity in the developing thalamus evolves over different stages in mice (Figure 4). In a first stage, endogenous and uncorrelated activity spans mid-embryonic mouse development (E12-E14), which affects the expression of genes involved in thalamocortical axon growth and branching when manipulated (Herrmann and Shatz, 1995; Uesaka et al., 2007; Mire et al., 2012; ; Moreno-Juan et al., 2017). After this initial stage, the activity in the thalamus becomes more synchronous and by E14, spontaneous synchronic activity takes the form of waves of spontaneous activity that initially propagate through FO nuclei and that later also engage HO nuclei (Moreno-Juan et al., 2017). After birth, spontaneous activity becomes less correlated, especially in the somatosensory and auditory nuclei and at P2, in the visual nucleus as well (Colonnese et al., 2010). The waves of spontaneous activity observed in the thalamus are transmitted along thalamocortical axons to the developing cortical areas and consequently, early thalamocortical input could have an impact on cortical development through activity-dependent mechanisms. Indeed, altering patterns of activity through genetic manipulation provokes cross-modal changes in the development of sensory areas in the cortex (Moreno-Juan et al., 2017; ). The electrical properties of the thalamocortical circuit progressively mature during the first two postnatal weeks, undertaking more continuous and decorrelated spontaneous firing (Murata and Colonnese, 2016, 2018; Martini et al., 2021). This transition in spontaneous thalamic activity seems to be critical for the onset of the active processing of environmental information by the cortex. Moreover, it might be caused by changes in the sensory organs, synaptic maturation or circuit remodeling, such as the gradual integration of inhibitory components (Demas et al., 2003; ; Sokhadze et al., 2018).
Thalamic interneurons
General overview
Thalamic neurons receive inhibitory inputs from projecting neurons residing in the prethalamus (RN, ZI, and vLGN) and from other extra-thalamic sources, such as the superior colliculus, basal ganglia, hypothalamus and pontine reticular formation (Halassa and Acsády, 2016). In addition, they are also inhibited by local GABA-releasing neurons, although the number and distribution of these local interneurons is not conserved across species. In small mammals like mice, marsupials and bats, interneurons are sparse and mainly found in the dLGN, whereas they are abundant and widely distributed throughout the thalamus in large mammals. Inhibitory interneurons are absent from the dLGN of some non-mammalian amniotes, such as crocodiles, lizards and snakes, but they are present in birds (). Local interneurons are not the only GABAergic cells in the mature thalamus, since there is a small subpopulation of GABAergic cells that reside within the IGL and pHB whose axons project to extra-thalamic targets (Harrington, 1997; Tou et al., 2007; Delogu et al., 2012; Inamura et al., 2012; Fernandez et al., 2018).
The origin of thalamic interneurons
Local interneurons that integrate into thalamic circuits are not born in the proliferative zone of the developing thalamus but rather, they migrate into the thalamus from other brain regions. Across species, some regions that generate thalamic neurons are conserved but also, additional regions are observed as thalamic circuits increase in complexity and size. The midbrain proliferative zone generates a stream of cells that colonizes the developing thalamus and that is made up of cells that differentiate into local GABAergic cells (Figure 3A; Jones, 2002; Hayes et al., 2003; ; Jager et al., 2021). In the mouse, the invasion of these local interneuron precursors begins at E17, starting from the caudal tier of the developing thalamus. Fate mapping experiments confirmed the midbrain origin of these cells, showing that they are born at approximately E10-E13 and that they belong to the Engrailed1 lineage (Jager et al., 2016, 2021), a transcription factor that is expressed in the midbrain and not the forebrain (Sgaier et al., 2007). The precursors generated from the Engrailed1 progenitors are also characterized by the expression of the transcription factors Sox14, Gata2, and Otx2 (Figure 3B). Once in the thalamus, these midbrain-derived interneurons adopt a specific spatial distribution, whereby they are enriched in FO nuclei but they also appear in HO and rostral nuclei (Jager et al., 2021). This subpopulation of GABAergic cells constitutes the largest of the local interneuron populations in the mature thalamus.
Another source of thalamic interneurons in the mouse is the developing prethalamus or prosomere 3 (Figure 3A). Located rostral to the thalamus, the developing prethalamus generates several GABAergic cell lineages, most of which populate prethalamic structures like the RTN and the vLGN, while others establish a stream of cells that invade the developing thalamus from its rostral tier around the time of birth (Golding et al., 2014; Jager et al., 2021). Approximately 20% of the population of local interneurons in the mature thalamus are specified in the developing prethalamus from a lineage that expresses Dlx1/2, Foxd1, and Dlx5/6, and that does not express Lhx6 or Nkx2.1 (Figure 3B). The prethalamus-derived interneurons that will invade the thalamus have features complementary to midbrain-derived interneurons, for example, they do not express Sox14 and they are enriched in HO nuclei (Jager et al., 2021).
Studying the origin of local thalamic interneurons is challenging because the thalamus does not generate local GABAergic neurons but it does generate projecting GABAergic neurons. The thalamic progenitors that give rise to projecting GABAergic neurons reside in the rostral tier of the proliferative neuroepithelium of prosomere 2, known as pTH-R (Tou et al., 2007). Indeed, the stream of cells derived from this progenitor domain can be distinguished from the neighboring caudal domain of thalamic progenitors (known as the pTH-C), and from prosomere 3, by the expression of post-mitotic markers like Sox14, Nkx2.2, and Tal1 (Jeong et al., 2011). The cells derived from pTH-R become GABAergic projection neurons that populate diencephalic regions, such as the pHB and the IGL. While IGL neurons project to the suprachiasmatic nucleus and other hypothalamic nuclei, pHB axons target the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, the dorsomedial striatum and the nucleus accumbens, and as such, they are involved in mechanisms that regulate mood (Moore et al., 2000; Fernandez et al., 2018; ).
An additional challenge is that extra-thalamic sources of local thalamic GABAergic neurons, like the prethalamus and midbrain, also generate other GABAergic neurons. As well as the Sox14-negative local interneurons of the thalamus, the proliferative zone of the prethalamus gives rise to many other GABAergic cells. At E10 in mice, the progenitor cells found in the ventricular zone of the prethalamus are characterized by strong expression of transcription factors like Olig2, Dlx genes and Foxd1 (Tou et al., 2007; ; Newman et al., 2018; Puelles et al., 2021). Before E14, the prethalamic lineage cells differentiate into neurons, and they start migrating laterally and dorsally to populate the nascent RTN, ZI and vLGN (Ono et al., 2008; Inamura et al., 2011). Almost all of these cells are either local or projecting GABAergic neurons, the latter targeting regions of the thalamus, pretectum and midbrain (Jones, 2007).
Genetic and activity-dependent factors control the development of thalamic interneurons
The neural tube of rodents exhibits three domains of GABAergic progenitors along its rostro-caudal axis (), each characterized by specific genetic programs with distinct terminal selector genes and giving rise to three broad GABA lineages. The borders of these domains are defined by molecular markers and by secondary organizers. Firstly, the rostral domain expands caudally from the ganglionic eminences, through prosomere 3 up to the ZLI in the diencephalon, where GABAergic differentiation depends on the Dlx1/2 lineage selector genes (Delogu et al., 2012; Le et al., 2017). Secondly, the ZLI separates the rostral domain from the intermediate domain, which expands caudally up to the isthmic organizer at the midbrain-hindbrain boundary. The intermediate domain includes prosomere 2, prosomere 1 and the midbrain, and GABAergic neurogenesis in the intermediate domain relies on the lineage selector genes Tal2 and Gata2 (Virolainen et al., 2012). Finally, the caudal domain spans through the hindbrain and spinal cord, where GABAergic fate is acquired through the expression of lineage selector genes like Ptf1a and Tal1 (Hoshino et al., 2005; Muroyama et al., 2005; Fujiyama et al., 2009). Therefore, the combined mesencephalic and prethalamic origin of thalamic interneurons mean they constitute a population with two broad molecular identities: the Dlx1/2 (enriched in HO nuclei) and the Gata2/Tal2 lineage (enriched in FO nuclei) (Figures 3A, B).
The GABAergic cells derived from each lineage acquire their identity during development through different genetic programs. Although the molecular mechanisms that confer GABAergic identity have not specifically been studied in thalamic interneurons, it is likely that each subpopulation of thalamic interneurons unfolds genetic programs according to their site of origin. For instance, GABA precursors in the developing midbrain start expressing Gata2 and Tal2 after cell-cycle exit, fate determinants that directly regulate the acquisition of a GABAergic phenotype. These cells activate sustained expression of downstream transcription factors related to the maintenance of a GABAergic identity (Tal1, Gata3, Six3, and Gad1) and to the correct migration of midbrain precursors (Sox14) (Delogu et al., 2012). Indeed, in mice lacking GATA2 or TAL2, GABAergic precursors from the midbrain fail to express genes related to GABA neurotransmission and they switch fate, acquiring a glutamatergic identity (Kala et al., 2009; ). However, it remains unclear to what extent midbrain-derived thalamic interneurons share a similar developmental trajectory with other midbrain-derived GABAergic cells. A similar genetic program could also be established for the prethalamic-derived thalamic interneurons and although there are no direct studies on this subpopulation, the developmental program is likely to resemble that of other GABAergic neurons derived from the rostral GABAergic domain, such as cortical and striatal interneurons (Lindtner et al., 2019). As such, the Dlx1/2 transcription factors may contribute to their GABAergic phenotype, either by directly controlling the expression of the GAD isoforms or by indirectly activating Dlx5 and Dlx6 transcription, markers of more mature GABAergic precursors (; Le et al., 2017).
In addition to intrinsic gene regulatory networks, extrinsic factors also influence the development of thalamic interneurons. In the mouse visual system, different developmental processes are thought to be extrinsically influenced by the input that arrives from the retina, ranging from neurogenesis to network recruitment of interneurons (Golding et al., 2014; ; Su et al., 2020). This is evident in animal models where retinal projections are absent or compromised. For example, in anophthalmic mice whose optic nerves were severed at birth and in mice with abnormal spontaneous retinal activity during development, thalamic interneurons accumulate in the upper tiers of the dLGN as opposed to adopting the homogenous distribution throughout the nucleus observed in control mice (Figure 3C; Golding et al., 2014). In these models, the synaptic properties of thalamic interneurons were also affected due to the downregulation of presynaptic and postsynaptic proteins, enhancing the excitability of dLGN neurons and disinhibiting the visual thalamocortical system. Similar results were reported in a transgenic mouse (Math5–/–) in which the optic tract does not develop, and following binocular enucleation in mice soon after birth (). In both scenarios, the distribution of thalamic interneurons was biased toward the dorsal part of the nucleus, failing to develop both mature intrinsic electrical properties and normal synaptic connectivity with relay neurons.
In addition to the alterations in the distribution of interneurons, there are fewer of these cells in the dLGN of Math5–/– mice than in control mice. This reduction in the number of interneurons correlates with abnormally weak FGF15 expression by some astrocytes residing in the visual thalamus (Su et al., 2020). Thus, as in other brain structures, it is likely that the release of FGFs contributes to the recruitment and maturation of inhibitory neurons. Accordingly, genetic ablation of FGF15 impairs the migration of thalamic interneurons into the dLGN and they become misrouted into the somatosensory nucleus. The expression of astrocytic FGF15 in the visual thalamus may be regulated by the SHH released from retinal axons (Deven Somaiya et al., 2022), and the expression of astrocytic FGF15 is reduced in the absence of retinal SHH, decimating the recruitment of interneurons. However, more evidence is needed regarding the interaction between SHH released from retinal axons, the SHH signaling cascades in astrocytes and FGF15 expression. Other effects of SHH might also be at play in these processes and for instance, SHH could exert a broader effect on thalamic astrocytes as it participates in astrocyte specification in brain regions like the retina (Dakubo et al., 2008).
Concluding remarks
In this review we first focus on the development of excitatory neurons of the thalamus, how they extend their axons and receive inputs from the cortex, and the role of spontaneous activity in the development of these projections. Next, we have delved into the information currently available regarding the development of the other main neuronal cell-type present in the thalamus, local GABAergic interneurons. The evidence compiled in this review establishes the state-of-the-art of the field but also, it poses important questions that need to be addressed. For instance, there are few studies that have investigated how the development of thalamocortical excitatory neurons and local GABAergic interneurons is orchestrated. Moreover, further studies are required to disentangle the precise origin of these local GABAergic neurons, as well as comparative studies using ancient species. It is still unclear what molecular signature determines the thalamic fate of interneurons derived from the midbrain, the prethalamus or other regions, as well as the guidance mechanisms that direct interneurons into the thalamus during development. Finally, since it is now well established that the thalamus presents different patterns of spontaneous activity and that changes in these patterns affect the development of other structures like the sensory cortices, it would be interesting to study the impact of this spontaneous thalamic activity on developing thalamic interneurons.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in this article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
GL-B, FM, and IH-G wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the European Research Council (ERC-2014-CoG-647012), the PROMETEO grant 2021/52 from the Generalitat Valenciana and the Spanish Ministry of Science, and Innovation and Universities (grants: PGC2018/096631-B-I00 and PID2021-127112NB-I00).
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the members of GL-B laboratory for stimulating discussions.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AchimK.PeltopuroP.LahtiL.TsaiH. H.ZachariahA.ÅstrandM.et al (2013). The role of Tal2 and Tal1 in the differentiation of midbrain GABAergic neuron precursors.Biol. Open2990–997. 10.1242/bio.20135041
2
AllendoerferK. L.ShatzC. J. (1994). The subplate, a transient neocortical structure: Its role in the development of connections between thalamus and cortex.Annu. Rev. Neurosci.17185–218. 10.1146/ANNUREV.NE.17.030194.001153
3
AnastasiadesP. G.CollinsD. P.CarterA. G. (2021). Mediodorsal and ventromedial thalamus engage distinct L1 circuits in the prefrontal cortex.Neuron109314–330.e4. 10.1016/J.NEURON.2020.10.031
4
Antón-BolañosN.EspinosaA.López-BenditoG. (2018). Developmental interactions between thalamus and cortex: A true love reciprocal story.Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.5233–41. 10.1016/J.CONB.2018.04.018
5
Antón-BolañosN.Sempere-FerràndezA.Guillamón-VivancosT.MartiniF. J.Pérez-SaizL.GezeliusH.et al (2019). Prenatal activity from thalamic neurons governs the emergence of functional cortical maps in mice.Science364987–990. 10.1126/science.aav7617
6
AssaliA.le MagueresseC.BennisM.NicolX.GasparP.RebsamA. (2017). RIM1/2 in retinal ganglion cells are required for the refinement of ipsilateral axons and eye-specific segregation.Sci. Rep.7:3236. 10.1038/S41598-017-03361-0
7
BagriA.MarínO.PlumpA. S.MakJ.PleasureS. J.RubensteinJ. L. R.et al (2002). Slit proteins prevent midline crossing and determine the dorsoventral position of major axonal pathways in the mammalian forebrain.Neuron33233–248. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00561-5
8
BakkenT. E.van VelthovenC. T. J.MenonV.HodgeR. D.YaoZ.NguyenT. N.et al (2015). Single-cell RNA-seq uncovers shared and distinct axes of variation in dorsal LGN neurons in mice, non-human primates and humans.eLife10:e64875. 10.1101/2020.11.05.367482
9
Ballester-RosadoC. J.AlbrightM. J.WuC. S.LiaoC. C.ZhuJ.XuJ.et al (2010). mGluR5 in cortical excitatory neurons exerts both cell-autonomous and -nonautonomous influences on cortical somatosensory circuit formation.J. Neurosci.3016896–16909. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2462-10.2010
10
BarthK. A.WilsonS. W. (1995). Expression of zebrafish nk2.2 is influenced by sonic hedgehog/vertebrate hedgehog-1 and demarcates a zone of neuronal differentiation in the embryonic forebrain.Development1211755–1768. 10.1242/DEV.121.6.1755
11
BickfordM. E. (2016). Thalamic circuit diversity: Modulation of the driver/modulator framework.Front. Neural Circ.9:86. 10.3389/FNCIR.2015.00086
12
BielleF.Marcos-MondejarP.KeitaM.MailhesC.VerneyC.Nguyen Ba-CharvetK.et al (2011). Slit2 activity in the migration of guidepost neurons shapes thalamic projections during development and evolution.Neuron691085–1098. 10.1016/J.NEURON.2011.02.026
13
BlackshawS.ScholppS.PlaczekM.IngrahamH.SimerlyR.ShimogoriT. (2010). Molecular pathways controlling development of thalamus and hypothalamus: From neural specification to circuit formation.J. Neurosci.3014925–14930. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4499-10.2010
14
BlakemoreC.MolnarZ. (1990). Factors involved in the establishment of specific interconnections between thalamus and cerebral cortex.Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.55491–504. 10.1101/SQB.1990.055.01.048
15
BraistedJ. E.CatalanoS. M.StimacR.KennedyT. E.Tessier-LavigneM.ShatzC. J.et al (2000). Netrin-1 promotes thalamic axon growth and is required for proper development of the thalamocortical projection.J. Neurosci.205792–5801. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-15-05792.2000
16
BraistedJ. E.RingstedtT.O’LearyD. D. M. (2009). Slits are chemorepellents endogenous to hypothalamus and steer thalamocortical axons into ventral telencephalon.Cereb. Cortex19(Suppl. 1) i144–i151. 10.1093/CERCOR/BHP035
17
BrooksJ. M.SuJ.LevyC.WangJ. S.SeabrookT. A.GuidoW.et al (2013). A molecular mechanism regulating the timing of corticogeniculate innervation.Cell Rep.5573–581. 10.1016/J.CELREP.2013.09.041
18
ButlerA. B. (2008). Evolution of the thalamus: A morphological and functional review.Thalamus. Relat. Syst.435–58. 10.1017/S1472928808000356
19
CadwellC. R.BhaduriA.Mostajo-RadjiM. A.KeefeM. G.NowakowskiT. J. (2019). Development and arealization of the cerebral cortex.Neuron103980–1004. 10.1016/J.NEURON.2019.07.009
20
Callejas-MarinA.Moreno-BravoJ. A.CompanyV.MadrigalM. P.Almagro-GarcíaF.MartínezS.et al (2022). Gli2-mediated Shh signaling is required for thalamocortical projection guidance.Front. Neuroanat.16:830758. 10.3389/FNANA.2022.830758
21
Castillo-PaternaM.Moreno-JuanV.FilipchukA.Rodríguez-MalmiercaL.SusínR.López-BenditoG. (2015). DCC functions as an accelerator of thalamocortical axonal growth downstream of spontaneous thalamic activity.EMBO Rep.16851–862. 10.15252/EMBR.201439882
22
CharalambakisN. E.GovindaiahG.CampbellP. W.GuidoW. (2019). Developmental remodeling of thalamic interneurons requires retinal signaling.J. Neurosci.393856–3866. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2224-18.2019
23
ChatterjeeM.LiJ. Y. H. (2012). Patterning and compartment formation in the diencephalon.Front. Neurosci.6:66. 10.3389/FNINS.2012.00066
24
ChatterjeeM.GuoQ.WeberS.ScholppS.LiJ. Y. H. (2014). Pax6 regulates the formation of the habenular nuclei by controlling the temporospatial expression of Shh in the diencephalon in vertebrates.BMC Biol.12:13. 10.1186/1741-7007-12-13
25
CheA.BabijR.IannoneA. F.FetchoR. N.FerrerM.ListonC.et al (2018). Layer I interneurons sharpen sensory maps during neonatal development.Neuron9998–116.e7. 10.1016/J.NEURON.2018.06.002
26
ChenL.GuoQ.LiJ. Y. H. (2009). Transcription factor Gbx2 acts cell-nonautonomously to regulate the formation of lineage-restriction boundaries of the thalamus.Development1361317–1326. 10.1242/DEV.030510
27
ChouS. J.BabotZ.Leingar̈tnerA.StuderM.NakagawaY.O’LearyD. D. M. (2013). Geniculocortical input drives genetic distinctions between primary and higher-order visual areas.Science3401239–1242. 10.1126/SCIENCE.1232806
28
ClascáF.AngelucciA.SurM. (1995). Layer-specific programs of development in neocortical projection neurons.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.9211145–11149. 10.1073/PNAS.92.24.11145
29
CobosI.BorelloU.RubensteinJ. L. R. (2007). Dlx transcription factors promote migration through repression of axon and dendrite growth.Neuron54873–888. 10.1016/J.NEURON.2007.05.024
30
ColonneseM. T. (2014). Rapid developmental emergence of stable depolarization during wakefulness by inhibitory balancing of cortical network excitability.J. Neurosci.345477–5485. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3659-13.2014
31
ColonneseM. T.KaminskaA.MinlebaevM.MilhM.BloemB.LescureS.et al (2010). A conserved switch in sensory processing prepares developing neocortex for vision. Neuron67, 480–498.
32
CrowleyJ. C.KatzL. C. (2000). Early development of ocular dominance columns.Science2901321–1324. 10.1126/SCIENCE.290.5495.1321
33
DakuboG. D.BeugS. T.MazerolleC. J.ThurigS.WangY.WallaceV. A. (2008). Control of glial precursor cell development in the mouse optic nerve by sonic hedgehog from retinal ganglion cells.Brain Res.122827–42. 10.1016/J.BRAINRES.2008.06.058
34
DatwaniA.IwasatoT.ItoharaS.ErzurumluR. S. (2002). NMDA receptor-dependent pattern transfer from afferents to postsynaptic cells and dendritic differentiation in the barrel cortex.Mol. Cell Neurosci.21477–492. 10.1006/mcne.2002.1195
35
de CarlosJ. A.O’LearyD. D. M. (1992). Growth and targeting of subplate axons and establishment of major cortical pathways.J. Neurosci.121194–1211. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-04-01194.1992
36
de Marco GarcíaN. V.PriyaR.TuncdemirS. N.FishellG.KarayannisT. (2015). Sensory inputs control the integration of neurogliaform interneurons into cortical circuits.Nat. Neurosci.18393–403. 10.1038/NN.3946
37
DeckM.LokmaneL.ChauvetS.MailhesC.KeitaM.NiquilleM.et al (2013). Pathfinding of corticothalamic axons relies on a rendezvous with thalamic projections.Neuron77472–484. 10.1016/J.NEURON.2012.11.031
38
DehayC.GiroudP.BerlandM.KillackeyH. P.KennedyH. (1996). Phenotypic characterisation of respecified visual cortex subsequent to prenatal enucleation in the monkey: Development of acetylcholinesterase and cytochrome oxidase patterns.J. Comp. Neurol.376386–402. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19961216)376:3<386::AID-CNE3>3.0.CO;2-Z
39
del RíoJ. A.MartínezA.AuladellC.SorianoE. (2000). Developmental history of the subplate and developing white matter in the murine neocortex. Neuronal organization and relationship with the main afferent systems at embryonic and perinatal stages.Cereb. Cortex10784–801. 10.1093/CERCOR/10.8.784
40
DeloguA.SellersK.ZagoraiouL.Bocianowska-ZbrogA.MandalS.GuimeraJ.et al (2012). Subcortical visual shell nuclei targeted by ipRGCs develop from a Sox14+-GABAergic progenitor and require sox14 to regulate daily activity rhythms.Neuron75648–662. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.013
41
DemasJ.EglenS. J.WongR. O. L. (2003). Developmental loss of synchronous spontaneous activity in the mouse retina is independent of visual experience.J. Neurosci.232851–2860. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-07-02851.2003
42
Deven SomaiyaR.StebbinsK.XieH.DeniseA.GarciaR.FoxM. A. (2022). Sonic hedgehog-dependent recruitment of GABAergic interneurons into the developing visual thalamus.eLife10:e79833. 10.1101/2022.02.22.481508
43
DufourA.SeibtJ.PassanteL.DepaepeV.CiossekT.FrisénJ.et al (2003). Area specificity and topography of thalamocortical projections are controlled by ephrin/Eph genes.Neuron39453–465. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00440-9
44
FernandezL. M. J.VantommeG.Osorio-ForeroA.CardisR.BéardE.LüthiA. (2018). Thalamic reticular control of local sleep in mouse sensory cortex.eLife7:e39111. 10.7554/ELIFE.39111
45
FerranJ. L.de OliveiraE. D.MerchánP.SandovalJ. E.Sánchez-ArronesL.Martínez-de-la-TorreM.et al (2009). Genoarchitectonic profile of developing nuclear groups in the chicken pretectum.J. Comp. Neurol.517405–451. 10.1002/CNE.22115
46
FujiyamaT.YamadaM.TeraoM.TerashimaT.HiokiH.InoueY. U.et al (2009). Inhibitory and excitatory subtypes of cochlear nucleus neurons are defined by distinct bHLH transcription factors, Ptf1a and Atoh1.Development1362049–2058. 10.1242/DEV.033480
47
GarelS.RubensteinJ. L. R. (2004). Intermediate targets in formation of topographic projections: Inputs from the thalamocortical system.Trends Neurosci.27533–539. 10.1016/J.TINS.2004.06.014
48
GoldingB.PouchelonG.BelloneC.MurthyS.di NardoA. A.GovindanS.et al (2014). Retinal input directs the recruitment of inhibitory interneurons into thalamic visual circuits.Neuron811057–1069. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.01.032
49
GrantE.Hoerder-SuabedissenA.MolnárZ. (2012). Development of the corticothalamic projections.Front. Neurosci.6:53. 10.3389/FNINS.2012.00053
50
GrantE.Hoerder-SuabedissenA.MolnarZ. (2016). The regulation of corticofugal fiber targeting by retinal inputs.Cereb. Cortex261336–1348. 10.1093/CERCOR/BHV315
51
GuoQ.LiJ. Y. H. (2019). Defining developmental diversification of diencephalon neurons through single cell gene expression profiling.Development146:dev174284. 10.1242/DEV.174284
52
GurungB.FritzschB. (2004). Time course of embryonic midbrain and thalamic auditory connection development in mice as revealed by carbocyanine dye tracing.J. Comp. Neurol.479309–327. 10.1002/CNE.20328
53
HalassaM. M.AcsádyL. (2016). Thalamic inhibition: Diverse sources, diverse scales.Trends Neurosci.39680–693. 10.1016/j.tins.2016.08.001
54
HalassaM. M.ShermanS. M. (2019). Thalamocortical circuit motifs: A general framework.Neuron103762–770. 10.1016/J.NEURON.2019.06.005
55
Hanganu-OpatzI. L. (2010). Between molecules and experience: Role of early patterns of coordinated activity for the development of cortical maps and sensory abilities.Brain Res. Rev.64160–176. 10.1016/J.BRAINRESREV.2010.03.005
56
HannanA. J.BlakemoreC.KatsnelsonA.VitalisT.HuberK. M.BearM.et al (2001). PLC-beta1, activated via mGluRs, mediates activity-dependent differentiation in cerebral cortex.Nat. Neurosci.4282–288. 10.1038/85132
57
HarringtonM. E. (1997). The ventral lateral geniculate nucleus and the intergeniculate leaflet: Interrelated structures in the visual and circadian systems.Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.21705–727. 10.1016/S0149-7634(96)00019-X
58
Hashimoto-ToriiK.MotoyamaJ.HuiC. C.KuroiwaA.NakafukuM.ShimamuraK. (2003). Differential activities of Sonic hedgehog mediated by Gli transcription factors define distinct neuronal subtypes in the dorsal thalamus.Mech. Dev.1201097–1111. 10.1016/j.mod.2003.09.001
59
HayesS. G.MurrayK. D.JonesE. G. (2003). Two epochs in the development of gamma-aminobutyric acidergic neurons in the ferret thalamus.J. Comp. Neurol.46345–65. 10.1002/CNE.10749
60
HenschT. K. (2004). Critical period regulation.Annu. Rev. Neurosci.27549–579. 10.1146/ANNUREV.NEURO.27.070203.144327
61
HerrmannK.ShatzC. J. (1995). Blockade of action potential activity alters initial arborization of thalamic axons within cortical layer 4.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.9211244–11248. 10.1073/PNAS.92.24.11244
62
HevnerR. F.Miyashita-LinE.RubensteinJ. L. R. (2002). Cortical and thalamic axon pathfinding defects in Tbr1, Gbx2, and Pax6 mutant mice: Evidence that cortical and thalamic axons interact and guide each other.J. Comp. Neurol.4478–17. 10.1002/CNE.10219
63
HirschJ. A.WangX.SommerF. T.MartinezL. M. (2015). How inhibitory circuits in the thalamus serve vision.Annu. Rev. Neurosci.38309–329. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014229
64
Hoerder-SuabedissenA.MolnárZ. (2015). Development, evolution and pathology of neocortical subplate neurons.Nat. Rev. Neurosci.16133–146. 10.1038/NRN3915
65
Hoerder-SuabedissenA.HayashiS.UptonL.NolanZ.Casas-TorremochaD.GrantE.et al (2018). Subset of cortical layer 6b neurons selectively innervates higher order thalamic nuclei in mice.Cereb. Cortex281882–1897. 10.1093/CERCOR/BHY036
66
HoshinoM.NakamuraS.MoriK.KawauchiT.TeraoM.NishimuraY. V.et al (2005). Ptf1a, a bHLH transcriptional gene, defines GABAergic neuronal fates in cerebellum.Neuron47201–213. 10.1016/J.NEURON.2005.06.007
67
HubermanA. D.FellerM. B.ChapmanB. (2008). Mechanisms underlying development of visual maps and receptive fields.Annu. Rev. Neurosci.31479–509. 10.1146/ANNUREV.NEURO.31.060407.125533
68
InamuraN.KimuraT.TadaS.KurahashiT.YanagidaM.YanagawaY.et al (2012). Intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms control the termination of cortical interneuron migration.J. Neurosci.326032–6042. 10.1523/jneurosci.3446-11.2012
69
InamuraN.OnoK.TakebayashiH.ZalcB.IkenakaK. (2011). Olig2 lineage cells generate GABAergic neurons in the prethalamic nuclei, including the zona incerta, ventral lateral geniculate nucleus and reticular thalamic nucleus.Dev. Neurosci.33118–129. 10.1159/000328974
70
IwasatoT.DatwaniA.WolfA. M.NishiyamaH.TaguchiY.TonegawaS.et al (2000). Cortex-restricted disruption of NMDAR1 impairs neuronal patterns in the barrel cortex.Nature406726–731. 10.1038/35021059
71
JacobsE. C.CampagnoniC.KampfK.ReyesS. D.KalraV.HandleyV.et al (2007). Visualization of corticofugal projections during early cortical development in a tau-GFP-transgenic mouse.Eur. J. Neurosci.2517–30. 10.1111/J.1460-9568.2006.05258.X
72
JagerP.MooreG.CalpinP.DurmishiX.SalgarellaI.MenageL.et al (2021). Dual midbrain and forebrain origins of thalamic inhibitory interneurons.eLife101–29. 10.7554/ELIFE.59272
73
JagerP.YeZ.YuX.ZagoraiouL.PrekopH. T.PartanenJ.et al (2016). Tectal-derived interneurons contribute to phasic and tonic inhibition in the visual thalamus.Nat. Commun.7:13579. 10.1038/ncomms13579
74
JeongY.DolsonD. K.WaclawR. R.MatiseM. P.SusselL.CampbellK.et al (2011). Spatial and temporal requirements for sonic hedgehog in the regulation of thalamic interneuron identity.Development138531–541. 10.1242/dev.058917
75
JhaveriS.EdwardsM. A.SchneiderG. E. (1991). Initial stages of retinofugal axon development in the hamster: Evidence for two distinct modes of growth.Exp. Brain Res.87371–382. 10.1007/BF00231854
76
JonesE. G. (2002). Thalamic circuitry and thalamocortical synchrony.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci.3571659–1673. 10.1098/RSTB.2002.1168
77
JonesE. G. (2007). The Thalamus.Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
78
KalaK.HaugasM.LilleväliK.GuimeraJ.WurstW.SalminenM.et al (2009). Gata2 is a tissue-specific post-mitotic selector gene for midbrain GABAergic neurons.Development136253–262. 10.1242/DEV.029900
79
KanoldP. O.LuhmannH. J. (2010). The subplate and early cortical circuits.Annu. Rev. Neurosci.3323–48. 10.1146/ANNUREV-NEURO-060909-153244
80
KataokaA.ShimogoriT. (2008). Fgf8 controls regional identity in the developing thalamus.Development1352873–2881. 10.1242/DEV.021618
81
KieckerC.LumsdenA. (2004). Hedgehog signaling from the ZLI regulates diencephalic regional identity.Nat. Neurosci.71242–1249. 10.1038/NN1338
82
LeT. N.ZhouQ. P.CobosI.ZhangS.ZagozewskiJ.JaponiS.et al (2017). GABAergic interneuron differentiation in the basal forebrain is mediated through direct regulation of glutamic acid decarboxylase isoforms by Dlx homeobox transcription factors.J. Neurosci.378816–8829. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2125-16.2017
83
LeeC. C.Murray ShermanS. (2010). Drivers and modulators in the central auditory pathways.Front. Neurosci.4:79. 10.3389/NEURO.01.014.2010
84
Leyva-DíazE.del ToroD.MenalM. J.CambrayS.SusínR.Tessier-LavigneM.et al (2014). FLRT3 is a Robo1-interacting protein that determines Netrin-1 attraction in developing axons.Curr. Biol.24494–508. 10.1016/J.CUB.2014.01.042
85
LiH.FertuzinhosS.MohnsE.HnaskoT. S.VerhageM.EdwardsR.et al (2013). Laminar and columnar development of barrel cortex relies on thalamocortical neurotransmission.Neuron79970–986. 10.1016/J.NEURON.2013.06.043
86
LiK.ZhangJ.LiJ. Y. H. (2012). Gbx2 plays an essential but transient role in the formation of thalamic nuclei.PLoS One7:e47111. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0047111
87
LindtnerS.Catta-PretaR.TianH.Su-FeherL.PriceJ. D.DickelD. E.et al (2019). Genomic resolution of DLX-orchestrated transcriptional circuits driving development of forebrain GABAergic neurons.Cell Rep.282048–2063.e8. 10.1016/J.CELREP.2019.07.022
88
LittleG. E.López-BenditoG.RünkerA. E.GarcíaN.PiñonM. C.ChédotalA.et al (2009). Specificity and plasticity of thalamocortical connections in Sema6A mutant mice.PLoS Biol.7:e98. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.1000098
89
López-BenditoG.MolnárZ. (2003). Thalamocortical development: How are we going to get there?Nat. Rev. Neurosci.4276–289. 10.1038/NRN1075
90
López-BenditoG.CautinatA.SánchezJ. A.BielleF.FlamesN.GarrattA. N.et al (2006). Tangential neuronal migration controls axon guidance: A role for neuregulin-1 in thalamocortical axon navigation.Cell125127–142. 10.1016/J.CELL.2006.01.042
91
López-BenditoG.FlamesN.MaL.FouquetC.di MeglioT.ChedotalA.et al (2007). Robo1 and Robo2 cooperate to control the guidance of major axonal tracts in the mammalian forebrain.J. Neurosci.273395–3407. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4605-06.2007
92
MallikaC.GuoQ.LiJ. Y. H. (2015). Gbx2 is essential for maintaining thalamic neuron identity and repressing habenular characters in the developing thalamus.Dev. Biol.40726–39. 10.1016/J.YDBIO.2015.08.010
93
Marcos-MondéjarP.PeregrínS.LiJ. Y.CarlssonL.ToleS.López-BenditoG. (2012). The lhx2 transcription factor controls thalamocortical axonal guidance by specific regulation of robo1 and robo2 receptors.J. Neurosci.324372–4385. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5851-11.2012
94
Marques-SmithA.LyngholmD.KaufmannA. K.StaceyJ. A.Hoerder-SuabedissenA.BeckerE. B. E.et al (2016). A transient translaminar GABAergic interneuron circuit connects thalamocortical recipient layers in neonatal somatosensory cortex.Neuron89536–549. 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.015
95
Martinez-FerreA.MartinezS. (2009). The development of the thalamic motor learning area is regulated by Fgf8 expression.J. Neurosci.2913389–13400. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2625-09.2009
96
Martinez-FerreA.MartinezS. (2012). Molecular regionalization of the diencephalon.Front. Neurosci.6:73. 10.3389/FNINS.2012.00073
97
MartiniF. J.Guillamón-VivancosT.Moreno-JuanV.ValdeolmillosM.López-BenditoG. (2021). Spontaneous activity in developing thalamic and cortical sensory networks.Neuron1092519–2534. 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.026
98
McConnellS. K.GhoshA.ShatzC. J. (1989). Subplate neurons pioneer the first axon pathway from the cerebral cortex.Science245978–982. 10.1126/SCIENCE.2475909
99
MétinC.GodementP. (1996). The ganglionic eminence may be an intermediate target for corticofugal and thalamocortical axons.J. Neurosci.163219–3235. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-10-03219.1996
100
MikoI. J.HenkemeyerM.CramerK. S. (2008). Auditory brainstem responses are impaired in EphA4 and ephrin-B2 deficient mice.Hear. Res.23539–46. 10.1016/J.HEARES.2007.09.003
101
MireE.MezzeraC.Leyva-DiázE.PaternainA. V.SquarzoniP.BluyL.et al (2012). Spontaneous activity regulates Robo1 transcription to mediate a switch in thalamocortical axon growth.Nat. Neurosci.151134–1143. 10.1038/NN.3160
102
MolnárZ.CorderyP. (1999). Connections between cells of the internal capsule, thalamus, and cerebral cortex in embryonic rat.J. Comp. Neurol.4131–25.
103
MolnárZ.GarelS.López-BenditoG.ManessP.PriceD. J. (2012). Mechanisms controlling the guidance of thalamocortical axons through the embryonic forebrain.Eur. J. Neurosci.351573–1585. 10.1111/J.1460-9568.2012.08119.X
104
MolyneauxB. J.ArlottaP.MenezesJ. R. L.MacklisJ. D. (2007). Neuronal subtype specification in the cerebral cortex.Nat. Rev. Neurosci.8427–437. 10.1038/NRN2151
105
MooreR. Y.WeisR.MogaM. M. (2000). Efferent projections of the intergeniculate leaflet and the ventral lateral geniculate nucleus in the rat.J. Comp. Neurol.420398–418.
106
Moreno-JuanV.Aníbal-MartínezM.Herrero-NavarroÁValdeolmillosM.MartiniF. J.López-BenditoG. (2022). Spontaneous thalamic activity modulates the cortical innervation of the primary visual nucleus of the thalamus.Neuroscience50887–97. 10.1016/J.NEUROSCIENCE.2022.07.022
107
Moreno-JuanV.FilipchukA.Antón-BolañosN.MezzeraC.GezeliusH.AndrésB.et al (2017). Prenatal thalamic waves regulate cortical area size prior to sensory processing.Nat. Commun.8:14172. 10.1038/NCOMMS14172
108
MurataY.ColonneseM. T. (2016). An excitatory cortical feedback loop gates retinal wave transmission in rodent thalamus.eLife5:e18816. 10.7554/ELIFE.18816
109
MurataY.ColonneseM. T. (2018). Thalamus controls development and expression of arousal states in visual cortex.J. Neurosci.388772–8786. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1519-18.2018
110
MuroyamaY.FujiwaraY.OrkinS. H.RowitchD. H. (2005). Specification of astrocytes by bHLH protein SCL in a restricted region of the neural tube.Nature43360–363. 10.1038/NATURE04139
111
NakagawaY. (2019). Development of the thalamus: From early patterning to regulation of cortical functions.Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol.8:e345. 10.1002/WDEV.345
112
NakagawaY.O’LearyD. D. M. (2001). Combinatorial expression patterns of LIM-homeodomain and other regulatory genes parcellate developing thalamus.J. Neurosci.212711–2725. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-08-02711.2001
113
NakagawaY.ShimogoriT. (2012). Diversity of thalamic progenitor cells and postmitotic neurons.Eur. J. Neurosci.351554–1562. 10.1111/J.1460-9568.2012.08089.X
114
NewmanE. A.WuD.TaketoM. M.ZhangJ.BlackshawS. (2018). Canonical Wnt signaling regulates patterning, differentiation and nucleogenesis in mouse hypothalamus and prethalamus.Dev. Biol.442236–248. 10.1016/J.YDBIO.2018.07.021
115
OnoK.TakebayashiH.IkedaK.FurushoM.NishizawaT.WatanabeK.et al (2008). Regional- and temporal-dependent changes in the differentiation of Olig2 progenitors in the forebrain, and the impact on astrocyte development in the dorsal pallium.Dev. Biol.320456–468. 10.1016/J.YDBIO.2008.06.001
116
PetersenC. C. H. (2007). The functional organization of the barrel cortex.Neuron56339–355. 10.1016/J.NEURON.2007.09.017
117
PfeiffenbergerC.CutforthT.WoodsG.YamadaJ.RenteríaR. C.CopenhagenD. R.et al (2005). Ephrin-As and neural activity are required for eye-specific patterning during retinogeniculate mapping.Nat. Neurosci.81022–1027. 10.1038/NN1508
118
PouchelonG.GambinoF.BelloneC.TelleyL.VitaliI.LüscherC.et al (2014). Modality-specific thalamocortical inputs instruct the identity of postsynaptic L4 neurons.Nature511471–474. 10.1038/NATURE13390
119
PriceD. J.CleggJ.DuocastellaX. O.WillshawD.PrattT. (2012). The importance of combinatorial gene expression in early mammalian thalamic patterning and thalamocortical axonal guidance.Front. Neurosci.6:37. 10.3389/FNINS.2012.00037
120
PuellesLDiazCStühmerTFerranJLMartínez-de la TorreMRubensteinJLR.LacZ-reporter mapping of Dlx5/6 expression and genoarchitectural analysis of the postnatal mouse prethalamus.J. Comp. Neurol. (2021). 529:367–420. 10.1002/CNE.24952
121
PuellesL.RubensteinJ. L. R. (2003). Forebrain gene expression domains and the evolving prosomeric model.Trends Neurosci.26469–476. 10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00234-0
122
Quintana-UrzainquiI.Hernández-MalmiercaP.CleggJ. M.LiZ.KozićZ.PriceD. J. (2020). The role of the diencephalon in the guidance of thalamocortical axons in mice.Development147:dev184523. 10.1242/DEV.184523
123
RakicP. (1991). Experimental manipulation of cerebral cortical areas in primates.Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci.331291–294. 10.1098/RSTB.1991.0019
124
ReichovaI.ShermanS. M. (2004). Somatosensory corticothalamic projections: Distinguishing drivers from modulators.J. Neurophysiol.922185–2197. 10.1152/JN.00322.2004
125
SchlaggarB. L.O’LearyD. D. M. (1994). Early development of the somatotopic map and barrel patterning in rat somatosensory cortex.J. Comp. Neurol.34680–96. 10.1002/CNE.903460106
126
ScholppS.DeloguA.GilthorpeJ.PeukertD.SchindlerS.LumsdenA. (2009). Her6 regulates the neurogenetic gradient and neuronal identity in the thalamus.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10619895–19900. 10.1073/PNAS.0910894106
127
ScholppS.WolfO.BrandM.LumsdenA. (2006). Hedgehog signalling from the zona limitans intrathalamica orchestrates patterning of the zebrafish diencephalon.Development133855–864. 10.1242/DEV.02248
128
SeibtJ.SchuurmansC.GradwholG.DehayC.VanderhaeghenP.GuillemotF.et al (2003). Neurogenin2 specifies the connectivity of thalamic neurons by controlling axon responsiveness to intermediate target cues.Neuron39439–452. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00435-5
129
SgaierS. K.LaoZ.VillanuevaM. P.BerenshteynF.StephenD.TurnbullR. K.et al (2007). Genetic subdivision of the tectum and cerebellum into functionally related regions based on differential sensitivity to engrailed proteins.Development1342325–2335. 10.1242/DEV.000620
130
ShermanS. M. (2017). Functioning of circuits connecting thalamus and cortex.Compr. Physiol.7713–739. 10.1002/CPHY.C160032
131
ShermanS. M.GuilleryR. W. (2002). The role of the thalamus in the flow of information to the cortex.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci.3571695–1708. 10.1098/RSTB.2002.1161
132
ShiW.XianyuA.HanZ.TangX.LiZ.ZhongH.et al (2017). Ontogenetic establishment of order-specific nuclear organization in the mammalian thalamus.Nat. Neurosci.20516–528. 10.1038/NN.4519
133
SokhadzeG.SeabrookT. A.GuidoW. (2018). The absence of retinal input disrupts the development of cholinergic brainstem projections in the mouse dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus 11 Medical and Health Sciences 1109 Neurosciences.Neural Dev.13:27. 10.1186/s13064-018-0124-7
134
SuJ.CharalambakisN. E.SabbaghU.SomaiyaR. D.MonavarfeshaniA.GuidoW.et al (2020). Retinal inputs signal astrocytes to recruit interneurons into visual thalamus.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1172671–2682. 10.1073/PNAS.1913053117
135
SumserA.MeaseR. A.SakmannB.GrohA. (2017). Organization and somatotopy of corticothalamic projections from L5B in mouse barrel cortex.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1148853–8858. 10.1073/PNAS.1704302114
136
Suzuki-HiranoA.OgawaM.KataokaA.YoshidaA. C.ItohD.UenoM.et al (2011). Dynamic spatiotemporal gene expression in embryonic mouse thalamus.J. Comp. Neurol.519528–543. 10.1002/CNE.22531
137
SwadlowH. A.AlonsoJ. M. (2017). Multielectrodes join the connectome.Nat. Methods14847–848. 10.1038/NMETH.4424
138
SzabóN. E.ZhaoT.ZhouX.Alvarez-BoladoG. (2009). The role of Sonic hedgehog of neural origin in thalamic differentiation in the mouse.J. Neurosci.292453–2466. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4524-08.2009
139
TakesianA. E.BogartL. J.LichtmanJ. W.HenschT. K. (2018). Inhibitory circuit gating of auditory critical-period plasticity.Nat. Neurosci.21218–227. 10.1038/s41593-017-0064-2
140
TheyelB. B.LeeC. C.ShermanS. M. (2010). Specific and nonspecific thalamocortical connectivity in the auditory and somatosensory thalamocortical slices.Neuroreport21861–864. 10.1097/WNR.0B013E32833D7CEC
141
TouY. V.AakerJ.TaniguchiA.KazemzadehC.SkidmoreJ. M.MartinD. M.et al (2007). Characterization of progenitor domains in the developing mouse thalamus.J. Comp. Neurol.50573–91. 10.1002/CNE.21467
142
TsukanoH.HorieM.OhgaS.TakahashiK.KubotaY.HishidaR.et al (2017). Reconsidering tonotopic maps in the auditory cortex and lemniscal auditory thalamus in mice.Front. Neural Circuits11:14. 10.3389/FNCIR.2017.00014
143
TuncdemirS. N.WamsleyB.StamF. J.OsakadaF.GouldingM.CallawayE. M.et al (2016). Early somatostatin interneuron connectivity mediates the maturation of deep layer cortical circuits.Neuron89521–535. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.020
144
UesakaN.HayanoY.YamadaA.YamamotoN. (2007). Interplay between laminar specificity and activity-dependent mechanisms of thalamocortical axon branching.J. Neurosci.275215–5223. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4685-06.2007
145
ViaeneA. N.PetrofI.Murray ShermanS. (2011). Synaptic properties of thalamic input to the subgranular layers of primary somatosensory and auditory cortices in the mouse.J. Neurosci.3112738–12747. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1565-11.2011
146
VirolainenS. M.AchimK.PeltopuroP.SalminenM.PartanenJ. (2012). Transcriptional regulatory mechanisms underlying the GABAergic neuron fate in different diencephalic prosomeres.Development1393795–3805. 10.1242/dev.075192
147
VueT. Y.BluskeK.AlishahiA.YangL. L.Koyano-NakagawaN.NovitchB.et al (2009). Sonic hedgehog signaling controls thalamic progenitor identity and nuclei specification in mice.J. Neurosci.294484–4497. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0656-09.2009
148
VueT. Y.LeeM.TanY. E.WerkhovenZ.WangL.NakagawaY. (2013). Thalamic control of neocortical area formation in mice.J. Neurosci.338442–8453. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5786-12.2013
149
WamsleyB.FishellG. (2017). Genetic and activity-dependent mechanisms underlying interneuron diversity.Nat. Rev. Neurosci.18299–309. 10.1038/NRN.2017.30
150
WongF. K.BercsenyiK.SreenivasanV.PortalésA.Fernández-OteroM.MarínO. (2018). Pyramidal cell regulation of interneuron survival sculpts cortical networks.Nature557668–673. 10.1038/s41586-018-0139-6
151
ZechelS.NakagawaY.IbáñezC. F. (2016). Thalamo-cortical axons regulate the radial dispersion of neocortical GABAergic interneurons.eLife5:e20770. 10.7554/ELIFE.20770
Summary
Keywords
thalamus, development, mouse, thalamocortical, interneurons
Citation
Huerga-Gómez I, Martini FJ and López-Bendito G (2023) Building thalamic neuronal networks during mouse development. Front. Neural Circuits 17:1098913. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2023.1098913
Received
15 November 2022
Accepted
18 January 2023
Published
03 February 2023
Volume
17 - 2023
Edited by
Edward S. Ruthazer, McGill University, Canada
Reviewed by
Fernando Garcia-Moreno, Achucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience, Spain; Konstantin Khodosevich, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Huerga-Gómez, Martini and López-Bendito.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Francisco J. Martini, fmartini@umh.esGuillermina López-Bendito, g.lbendito@umh.es
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.