EDITORIAL article
Front. Radiol.
Sec. Artificial Intelligence in Radiology
Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fradi.2025.1676229
This article is part of the Research TopicTowards Precision Oncology: Assessing the Role of Radiomics and Artificial IntelligenceView all 13 articles
Editorial: Towards Precision Oncology: Assessing the Role of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- 2Universita degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza Dipartimento di Scienze Medico-Chirurgiche e Medicina Translazionale, Rome, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Another paper investigating the potential role of radiomics in di erential diagnosis, in a di erent clinical scenario then lung cancer, is the one published by Hu et al. The authors investigated the potential role of a Rad-score to discriminate esophageal sarcomatoid carcinoma and esophageal squamous carcinoma, and found a 0.828 (95% CI 0.636-1.000) in the validation cohort. Radiomics may also provide assistance in the characterization of tumoral lesions, which is of paramount importance to move radiology forward to precision oncology. Peng et al. evaluated the performance of a clinical-radiomics model to predict HER2 status in urothelial bladder carcinoma from contrast-enhanced CT images. Such clinical-radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.85, and decision curve analysis indicated that the clinical-radiomics model provided good clinical benefit. Zhang et al. extracted radiomics from ultrasound images to predict tumor infiltrating lymphocyte levels in breast cancer. In comparison to grayscale ultrasound model, and radiomics model, the nomogram integrating both demonstrated superior discriminative ability on both the training (AUC 0.88) and testing (AUC 0.82) set. Ye et al. moved the field a step forward, as they compared a conventional radiomics model and a tumor internal heterogeneity habitat model in predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. As a result, the habitat model exhibited higher AUC values compared to the conventional radiomics model, achieving an AUC of 0.78 and 0.72, respectively. Moreover, although radiomic features are often described as imperceptible to the human eye, this does not imply that their conversion into colorimetric maps could not aid image interpretation and lesion detection. Hertel et al. used radiomics to improve detection of colorectal liver metastases on images and found that the feature map for firstorder RootMeanSquared was ranked superior in terms of very high visual contrast in 57.4% of cases, compared to 41.0% in standard reconstructions. This very heterogeneous research topic also included papers investigating di erent clinical settings, such as the one by Kruzhilov et al., investigating the role of AI in whole-body PET imaging denoising, and the on by Tang et al., exploring the transformative application of the metaverse in nuclear medicine. These studies demonstrate that the integration of radiomics and artificial intelligence represents a promising pathway to transform oncologic imaging into a quantitative and decision-support tool: from pulmonary nodules to molecular biomarkers, and toward new modalities for data visualization and optimization. However, to consolidate this transition into clinical practice, investment is needed in multicenter studies, standardized pipelines, model transparency, and interpretative interfaces. Such an approach could support the sustainable implementation of clinical AI and open new frontiers, including the educational and collaborative metaverse, in precision oncology.
Keywords: Radiomics, machine learning, artificial intelligence, Oncologic Imaging, precision medicine
Received: 30 Jul 2025; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Fanni, Caruso, Faggioni, Neri and Cioni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Salvatore Claudio Fanni, Department of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.