CASE REPORT article
Front. Radiol.
Sec. Neuroradiology
Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fradi.2025.1687401
This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Neuroradiology: Emerging Diagnostic and Therapeutic InnovationsView all articles
Diagnostic Challenges of Gliosarcoma: Case report of a Rare Glioblastoma Histopathological Variant
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Neurosurgery Federal Center of Neurosurgery, Tyumen, Russia
- 2Tyumen State Medical University, Tyumen, Russia
- 3GBUZ Oblastnaa kliniceskaa bol'nica No 2, Tyumen, Russia
- 4Pervyj Sankt-Peterburgskij gosudarstvennyj medicinskij universitet imeni akademika I P Pavlova, Saint Petersburg, Russia
- 5Tyumen State Medical University , Tyumen , Russia, Tyumen, Russia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: According to the 5th revision of World Health Organization (WHO) of Central Nervous System (CNS) tumors classification, gliosarcoma is a malignant tumor grade 4 and is the rarest and aggressive subtype of IDH-wild type glioblastoma. The special histopathological feature of the tumor is its biphasic differentiation including both the glial and sarcomatous (mesenchymal) components in the tumor. The characteristics mentioned above create difficulties in radiological and histological diagnosis. Due to its rarity, gliosarcoma is typically not even considered in the differential diagnosis. Case Presentation: A 55-year-old man exhibiting acute right-sided hemiparesis and disorientation for 12 hours with loss of consciousness is described in this clinical case study. Brain МRI revealed intracerebral mass in the left fronto-parietal area with the close relationship to the dura mater, ring-like enhancement, severe perifocal edema, restricted diffusion of the solid component, internal vascular shunts, microhemorrhages and had elevated perfusion values. At the preoperative stage the differential diagnosis included glioblastoma, solitary metastasis and possibility of an anaplastic meningioma. The tumor microsurgical resection was performed. According to the results of histological and immunohistochemical studies gliosarcoma was diagnosed. Discussion: The only characteristic gliosarcoma feature was the phenomenon of solid node heterogeneity detected on conventional T2 weighted sequence: the combination of hypo-and hyperintense parts. While mpMRI aids in differentiating high-grade gliomas, metastases, and meningiomas, gliosarcoma remains underrecognized due to overlapping features. The observed T2 heterogeneity may serve as a potential radiological marker for gliosarcoma. The accurate and timely identification of brain tumor type is required to establish the appropriate extent of resection in surgical planning. Conclusion: The case publication intends not to ignore the data of conventional sequences and consider them to be included in the structure of multiparametric MRI protocol. However, larger studies are needed to validate these findings and refine diagnostic criteria for this rare tumor.
Keywords: Gliosarcoma, T2-WI heterogeneity, Glioblastoma, Anaplastic meningioma, solitary metastases, Multiparametric MRI
Received: 17 Aug 2025; Accepted: 19 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Karasev, Talybov, Chertoyev, Trofimova, Mochalov, Kleshchevnikova, Loginova and Karaseva. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Rustam Talybov, rustam230789@gmail.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.