ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Radiol.
Sec. Cardiothoracic Imaging
This article is part of the Research TopicEmerging Fast Medical Imaging Techniques in RadiologyView all 7 articles
Application of one heartbeat acquisition with motion correction algorithm in CCTA of patients with atrial fibrillation: Evaluation of coronary artery stenose using Artificial Intelligence Assisted Diagnostic System
Provisionally accepted- 1The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
- 2CT Research Center, GE Healthcare, Beijing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract Introduction: Motion artifacts induced by atrial fibrillation (AF) present a substantial challenge in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Wide detectors, rapid scanning, and motion correction algorithms can effectively improve image quality in CCTA. This study aims to evaluate the impact of one-beat acquisition with a motion correction algorithm (Snapshot Freeze 1, SSF1) on the image quality of prospective CCTA in patients with AF, and its diagnostic performance using an artificial intelligence assisted diagnostic system (AI-ADS). Materials and methods: A total of 91 consecutive patients with AF, who underwent one-beat CCTA were analyzed. Images were reconstructed with SSF1. The subjective and objective image quality of the coronary arteries were evaluated. Using the invasive coronary catheter angiography (ICA) as the reference standard, the diagnostic performance of AI-ADS and AI-ADS + radiologist for stenoses above moderate and severe degrees were calculated. Results: Effective radiation dose was 2.43 ± 0.88 mSv. The average CT values of all major coronary arteries and branches were greater than 400HU. All vessels were diagnosable (scores≥3) with good or above ratings at 96.15% (350/364) and 96.70% (352/364). The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and AUC of AI-ADS vs AI-ADS + radiologist for above moderate stenoses were: (84.62% vs 91.21%), (89.61% vs 98.70%), (57.14% vs 50.00%) and (0.73 vs 0.74) on patient level; (84.07% vs 87.64%), (74.07% vs 85.19%), (89.96% vs 89.08%) and (0.82 vs 0.87) on vessel level; (90.84% vs 93.11%), (63.59% vs 78.34%), (95.99% vs 95.91%) and (0.80 vs 0.87) on segment level. For severe stenoses, these values were: (62.64% vs 82.42%), (58.62% vs 91.38%), (69.70% vs 66.67%) and (0.64 vs 0.79) on patient level; (82.97% vs 89.29%), (46.43% vs 75.00%), (93.93% vs 93.57%) and (0.70 vs 0.84) on vessel level; (92.23% vs 95.16%), (36.92% vs 66.92%), (98.06% vs 98.14%) and (0.68 vs 0.83) on segment level. Conclusion: One-beat CCTA with SSF1 provides high-quality coronary images for patients with AF. AI-ADS automatically distinguishes coronary images with different stenoses, but the sensitivity of AI-ADS is low, especially for severe stenoses. AI-ADS + radiologist further improves the diagnostic performance.
Keywords: Atrial Fibrillation, coronary artery CT angiography, artificial intelligence, Diagnostic performance, Motion correction algorithm
Received: 24 Aug 2025; Accepted: 30 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhu, Li, Tian, Jia, Qu, Li, Zhang, Cheng, Cao, Chen and Guo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jianxin  Guo, gjx1665@xjtufh.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
