POLICY AND PRACTICE REVIEWS article
Front. Reprod. Health
Sec. Access and Barriers to Reproductive Health Services
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1605480
Policy solutions to improve access to fertility treatment and optimise patient care: Consensus from an expert forum
Provisionally accepted- 1International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Vancouver, Canada
- 2Equal3 Fertility, Cupertino, United States
- 3Charles River Associates International,Inc, London, United Kingdom
- 4University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom
- 5ART Fertility Clinics LLC, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- 6University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
- 7Member of Latin America Oncofertility Network, Oncofertility Consortium, São Paulo, Brazil
- 8Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
- 9University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
- 10Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- 11IVIRMA Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- 12Monash IVF, Cremone, Australia
- 13Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- 14Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Infertility is an underrecognized disease which affects over 17% of the reproductive age population worldwide. However, availability of, and access to, assisted reproductive technology (ART) is variable across countries. There are significant challenges relating to awareness, financial and other barriers to care, cultural considerations, and the level of support provided to people undergoing care. Previous studies have explored these challenges, but less attention has been given to the policy implications. As the need for fertility care rises, we investigate the evidence that policy changes can be implemented to improve access to ART treatment. A review of literature was conducted on fertility policy challenges and developments, covering fertility recognition and awareness; cultural and religious considerations; and access to ART treatment, psycho-social care, and supplementary care. Nine medical and academic experts were invited to validate secondary research findings and provide their perspectives on policy implications. The experts covered different specialties and geographic expertise. Experts participated in individual 60-minute interviews, then a half-day Policy Forum discussion was held virtually in May 2023.Lack of recognition of infertility as a disease, low financial coverage of fertility services, limited psychosocial support, and cultural considerations are substantial barriers to fertility services access. Some countries have limited reimbursement of services or offer only private care, significantly limiting treatment access. Others restrict reimbursement based on age, gender and family status, which creates access inequities. Policy action is needed to mitigate these challenges and to ensure timely and equitable access to fertility care. Decision-makers need to collectively recognize infertility as a disease, rather than just a social issue. Equity of access to infertility services should be ensured by expanding the availability of public funding, along with review and rationalisation of criteria for treatment reimbursement. To improve engagement in treatment and support through the fertility journey, access to psychosocial care should be expanded and included as a core service. Major obstacles to accessing ART treatment have been identified across regions globally, highlighting the urgent need for national policy action to enhance care quality by reviewing current legislation, improving patient and physician education, refining reimbursement procedures, and expanding psychosocial support services.
Keywords: fertility treatment, Fertility policy, Infertility, Policy recommendations, Assisted Reproductive Technology
Received: 08 Apr 2025; Accepted: 11 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Adamson, Armstrong, Cheong, Damato, Fatemi, Ferriani, Griesinger, Ledger, Pistollato, Pellicer, Petrova, Rombauts, Wilsdon and Ziebe. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Angelina Petrova, Charles River Associates International,Inc, London, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.