ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Reprod. Health

Sec. Access and Barriers to Reproductive Health Services

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1609662

This article is part of the Research TopicPostpartum Contraception and Maternal Health: Challenges and StrategiesView all articles

Mapping the Journey: Enhancing Abortion Care in Uganda's Health Systems

Provisionally accepted
Steve  Biko SiguSteve Biko Sigu*Isaac  Milton OdongoIsaac Milton OdongoWilbert  NangoWilbert NangoSilvester  OkechiSilvester OkechiAnnah  KukundakweAnnah KukundakweJohn  Musoba KituiJohn Musoba Kitui
  • Ipas Africa Alliance, Nairobi, Kenya

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This study explores women's experiences with abortion care in Uganda's public health system, assessing satisfaction levels and their influence on the uptake of abortion and post-abortion contraception services. Conducted across nine districts, it highlights challenges within a legally restricted abortion landscape that continues to contribute to high rates of unintended pregnancies and unsafe abortions Methods: The study employed a mixed-methods approach involving client exit interviews and in-depth interviews across nine Ugandan districts from January to June 2024 in 13 Ipas Alliance-supported health facilities. Data from 440 women aged 15-49 captured demographics, treatment outcomes, abortion service uptake, post-abortion contraception use, and satisfaction levels. Additionally, 63 in-depth interviews provided qualitative insights into women's care experiences.Quantitative data were analyzed using logistic regression to assess associations between sociodemographic factors, provider interaction, and satisfaction with abortion services, offering a comprehensive understanding of the client journey and care quality Results: Logistic regression analysis of client exit interview data revealed no statistically significant differences in satisfaction levels across sociodemographic groups, including age, marital status, facility location, education level, or type of abortion service. However, positive provider engagement was strongly associated with higher satisfaction. Clients who experienced respectful and supportive interactions were significantly more likely to report satisfaction (OR: 0.47, 95% CI:1.14-14.47, p = 0.01), and indicated greater willingness to recommend the facility and return for future services, underscoring the importance of quality provider-client engagement. Qualitative insights offered an in-depth understanding of women's experiences with abortion care services across different levels of the health system.Client satisfaction with abortion services was strongly linked to positive provider engagement rather than sociodemographic factors. Respectful, supportive interactions significantly increased the likelihood of satisfaction with care, future service use of services, and facility recommendation. These findings underscore the critical role of provider- client relationships in improving service experience. To enhance the quality of abortion care, health systems should prioritize respectful counseling, strengthen referral pathways, and address structural constraints to service delivery.

Keywords: Journey mapping1, comprehensive abortion care2, Health systems 3, post abortion care4, Client exit Interview5. (Min.5-Max. 8)

Received: 10 Apr 2025; Accepted: 26 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Sigu, Odongo, Nango, Okechi, Kukundakwe and Kitui. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Steve Biko Sigu, Ipas Africa Alliance, Nairobi, Kenya

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.