Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Reprod. Health

Sec. Gynecology

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1629834

The Epidemiology of Uterine Fibroids: Global Disease Burden from 1990 to 2021 and Future Trend Predictions

Provisionally accepted
Chan  WuChan Wu1*Ling  ZhouLing Zhou2Ruilin  ChenRuilin Chen3Huiling  LiHuiling Li2Jian  LiJian Li1Feifei  GuoFeifei Guo1Rong  LiRong Li1Huaijun  ZhouHuaijun Zhou1Jingjing  HuangJingjing Huang1
  • 1Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China
  • 2Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 3Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background Uterine fibroids (UF) are the most common benign tumors of the female reproductive system, imposing a significant health burden. A comprehensive understanding of their global, regional, and national burden is essential for targeted public health planning. This study aimed to analyze the spatiotemporal trends of UF burden from 1990 to 2021 and project future trends to 2036.Methods Data on the incidence, prevalence, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of UF from 1990 to 2021 were extracted from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 study, covering 204 countries and territories. We analyzed trends using estimated annual percentage changes (EAPC) for age-standardized rates. Socio-demographic Index (SDI) was used to assess the association between development level and disease burden. The Slope Index of Inequality (SII) and concentration index were employed to quantify health inequalities. A Bayesian age-period-cohort(BAPC) model was used to project the burden to 2036.Results Between 1990 and 2021, the global ASIR of UF rose from 234.36 (95%UI: 171.06, 309.92) to 250.93 (183.44, 330.94) per 100,000 (EAPC 0.24 [0.23, 0.25]). The ASPR increased from 2799.88 (2133.46, 3650.54) to 2841.07 (2164.43, 3682.27) (EAPC 0.04 [0.03, 0.06]). DALYs grew from 81,142 (57,125, 111,989) to 142,885 (102,183, 192,988), while ASDR showed little change, from 3.48 (2.46, 4.77) to 3.39 (2.43, 4.59). Regional analysis indicated that South Asia exhibited the highest incidence and prevalence of UF, whereas Oceania and Australia experienced a lower burden. Analysis of health inequality revealed a shift in the burden of UF incidence and prevalence from high to low Socio-Demographic Index (SDI) countries between 1990 and 2021, indicating a reduction in health inequality. Future predictions from the BAPC model indicate that both ASIR and ASPR are expected to continue to rise, while ASDR is likely to decline. Conclusions From 1990 to 2021, the global incidence of UF has steadily risen, with South Asia experiencing the greatest impact. Health inequality analysis indicates that the burden of UF is shifting toward low SDI countries.Future prevention and treatment strategies for UF should focus on middle-and low-income countries, specifically by implementing targeted screening programs, investing in low-cost diagnostic tools, and launching public health awareness campaigns.

Keywords: Uterine fibroids, Global burden of disease, health inequality, Bayesian Age-Period-Cohort(BAPC), prediction

Received: 23 May 2025; Accepted: 28 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wu, Zhou, Chen, Li, Li, Guo, Li, Zhou and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Chan Wu, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.