Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Reprod. Health

Sec. Reproductive Epidemiology

Global prevalence of preeclampsia, eclampsia, and HELLP syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Víctor Juan  Vera-PonceVíctor Juan Vera-Ponce1*Joan A.  Loayza-CastroJoan A. Loayza-Castro1Jhosmer  Ballena-CaicedoJhosmer Ballena-Caicedo1Fiorella  E. Zuzunaga-MontoyaFiorella E. Zuzunaga-Montoya2Lupita  Ana Maria Valladolid-SandovalLupita Ana Maria Valladolid-Sandoval1Carmen  Inés Gutierrez De CarrilloCarmen Inés Gutierrez De Carrillo1
  • 1Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza, Chachapoyas, Amazonas, Peru
  • 2Universidad Continental, Huancayo, Peru

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy represent a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. However, prevalence estimates of preeclampsia, eclampsia, and HELLP syndrome vary considerably across studies and regions. Objective: To determine the global prevalence of preeclampsia, eclampsia, and HELLP (Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, and Low Platelet count) syndrome, analyze their geographical distribution, and evaluate temporal and methodological trends. Methodology: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted. SCOPUS, Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE databases were searched through May 2025. Observational studies reporting prevalence data using standardized diagnostic criteria were included. Prevalences were pooled using a random-effects model with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Subgroup analyses by diagnostic criteria and countries and meta-regressions by publication year and sample size were performed. Results: Seventy studies on preeclampsia (2,465,570 participants), 21 on eclampsia (9,782,257 participants), and nine on HELLP syndrome (133,611 participants) were analyzed. The global prevalence of preeclampsia was 4.43 (95% CI: 3.73–5.20), with significant differences between ACOG (4.68%) and ISSHP (3.66%) criteria. For eclampsia, the prevalence was 0.43% (95% CI: 0.19–0.76%), while the estimate for HELLP syndrome is 0.39% (95% CI: 0.16–0.72%), which must be interpreted with considerable caution as it is derived from a limited pool of only nine studies. Marked regional disparities were identified, with higher prevalences in low-income countries. Meta-regression for preeclampsia revealed a non-significant increasing trend over time (p=0.23) and a significant inverse correlation with sample size (p<0.01). For eclampsia, neither the temporal trend (p=0.68) nor the association with sample size (p=0.65) was statistically significant. Conclusions: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy affect 4.43% (95% CI: 3.73-5.20%) of pregnancies globally for preeclampsia, 0.43% (95% CI: 0.19-0.76%) for eclampsia, and 0.39% (95% CI: 0.16-0.72%) for HELLP syndrome, with considerable variations according to regions and diagnostic criteria. The upward trend underscores the need to strengthen epidemiological surveillance systems and preventive programs, especially in high-prevalence areas.

Keywords: Preeclampsia, Eclampsia, HELLP Syndrome, Prevalence, Epidemiology, Meta-analysis, Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, Maternal health

Received: 15 Sep 2025; Accepted: 27 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Vera-Ponce, Loayza-Castro, Ballena-Caicedo, Zuzunaga-Montoya, Valladolid-Sandoval and Gutierrez De Carrillo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Víctor Juan Vera-Ponce, victor.vera@untrm.edu.pe

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.