Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Conserv. Sci., 17 January 2024
Sec. Global Biodiversity Threats
Volume 4 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2023.1326672

Corrigendum: Development of a multi-scale monitoring programme: approaches for the Arctic and lessons learned from the Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Programme 2002-2022

Tom Barry1,2* Tom Christensen3 Carolina Behe4 Catherine Coon5 Joseph M. Culp6 Dag Vongraven7 Sierra Fletcher8 Micheal Gill9 Willem Goedkoop10 Reidar Hindrum11 Cynthia Jacobson12 Tahzay Jones13 Kári Fannar Lárusson14 Jennifer Lento15 Mark Marissink16 Donald McLennan17 Courtney Price14 Mia Rönkä18 Michael Svoboda19 Inge Thaulow20 Jason Taylor21 Susse Wegeberg3 Niels Martin Schmidt3 Risa Smith22 Ævar Petersen23
  • 1Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Akureyri, Akureyri, Iceland
  • 2Stefansson Arctic Institute, Akureyri, Iceland
  • 3Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark
  • 4Independent researcher, Seattle, Washington, DC, United States
  • 5Bureau of Ocean Energy Management - Alaska Regional Office, Department of the Interior Region, Anchorage, AK, United States
  • 6Department of Biology, and Geography and Environmental Studies, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada
  • 7Norwegian Polar Institute, Tromso, Norway
  • 8Nuka Research and Planning Group, Seldovia, AK, United States
  • 9Biodiversity Indicators Program, NatureServe, Arlington, VA, United States
  • 10Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
  • 11Independent researcher, Trondheim, Norway
  • 12Innovative Outcomes, Carbondale, CO, United States
  • 13National Park Service, Anchorage, AK, United States
  • 14Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF), Akureyri, Iceland
  • 15Canadian Rivers Institute and Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada
  • 16Swedish Species Information Centre, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) Artdatabanken, Uppsala, Sweden
  • 17COENOSIS, Martins Brook, NS, Canada
  • 18Biodiversity Unit, Faculty of Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
  • 19Environment and Climate Change, Whitehorse, YT, Canada
  • 20Enviromental Affairs, Government of Greenland, Greenland Representation, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 21Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, United States
  • 22The International Union for Nature Conservation (IUCN), World Commission on Protected Areas, Gland, Switzerland
  • 23Independent, Researcher, Reykjavík, Iceland

A Corrigendum on:
Development of a multi-scale monitoring programme: approaches for the Arctic and lessons learned from the Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Programme 2002-2022

by Barry T, Christensen T, Behe C, Coon C, Culp JM, Vongraven D, Fletcher S, Gill M, Goedkoop W, Hindrum R, Jacobson C, Jones T, Lárusson KF, Lento J, Marissink M, McLennan D, Price C, Rönkä M, Svoboda M, Thaulow I, Taylor J, Wegeberg S, Schmidt NM, Smith R, and Petersen Æ (2023) Front. Conserv. Sci. 4:1220521. doi: 10.3389/fcosc.2023.1220521

Error in author list

In the published article, there was an error in the author list, and authors Dag Vongraven and Ævar Petersen were erroneously excluded. The corrected author list appears below.

[Tom Barry1,2*, Tom Christensen3, Carolina Behe4, Catherine Coon5, Joseph M. Culp6, Dag Vongraven7, Sierra Fletcher8, Micheal Gill9, Willem Goedkoop10, Reidar Hindrum11, Cynthia Jacobson12, Tahzay Jones13, Kári Fannar Lárusson14, Jennifer Lento15, Mark Marissink16, Donald McLennan17, Courtney Price14, Mia Rönkä18, Michael Svoboda19, Inge Thaulow20, Jason Taylor21, Susse Wegeberg3, Niels Martin Schmidt3, Risa Smith22 Ævar Petersen23],

● 1Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Akureyri, Akureyri, Iceland

● 2Stefansson Arctic Institute, Akureyri, Iceland

● 3Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark

● 4Independent researcher, Seattle, Washington, DC, United States

● 5Bureau of Ocean Energy Management - Alaska Regional Office, Department of the Interior Region, Anchorage, AK, United States

● 6Department of Biology, and Geography and Environmental Studies, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada

● 7 Norwegian Polar Institute, Tromso, Norway

● 8Nuka Research and Planning Group, Seldovia, AK, United States

● 9Biodiversity Indicators Program, NatureServe, Arlington, VA, United States

● 10Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

● 11Independent researcher, Trondheim, Norway

● 12Innovative Outcomes, Carbondale, CO, United States

● 13National Park Service, Anchorage, AK, United States

● 14Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF), Akureyri, Iceland

● 15Canadian Rivers Institute and Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada

● 16Swedish Species Information Centre, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) Artdatabanken, Uppsala, Sweden

● 17COENOSIS, Martins Brook, NS, Canada

● 18Biodiversity Unit, Faculty of Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

● 19Environment and Climate Change, Whitehorse, YT, Canada

● 20Enviromental Affairs, Government of Greenland, Greenland Representation, Copenhagen, Denmark

● 21Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, United States

● 22The International Union for Nature Conservation (IUCN), World Commission on Protected Areas, Gland, Switzerland

● 23 Independent, Researcher, Reykjavík, Iceland

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: Ecosystem-Based Management, Indigenous Knowledge, co-production of knowledge, CAFF, Arctic Council, Arctic, conservation

Citation: Barry T, Christensen T, Behe C, Coon C, Culp JM, Vongraven D, Fletcher S, Gill M, Goedkoop W, Hindrum R, Jacobson C, Jones T, Lárusson KF, Lento J, Marissink M, McLennan D, Price C, Rönkä M, Svoboda M, Thaulow I, Taylor J, Wegeberg S, Schmidt NM, Smith R and Petersen Æ (2024) Corrigendum: Development of a multi-scale monitoring programme: approaches for the Arctic and lessons learned from the Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Programme 2002-2022. Front. Conserv. Sci. 4:1326672. doi: 10.3389/fcosc.2023.1326672

Received: 23 October 2023; Accepted: 15 December 2023;
Published: 17 January 2024.

Approved by:

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Copyright © 2024 Barry, Christensen, Behe, Coon, Culp, Vongraven, Fletcher, Gill, Goedkoop, Hindrum, Jacobson, Jones, Lárusson, Lento, Marissink, McLennan, Price, Rönkä, Svoboda, Thaulow, Taylor, Wegeberg, Schmidt, Smith and Petersen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Tom Barry, tom@unak.is

Download