Editorial: From simulation to the operating theatre: new insights in translational surgery
Naci Balak
Eleni Tsianaka
Cesare Zoia
Amitendu Sekhar
Mario Ganau- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
- 2Neurosurgery Department, Kuwait Hospital, Sabah Al Salem, Kuwait
- 3Neurosurgery Unit, Ospedale Moriggia Pelascini, Gravedona, Italy
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, Bahrain Defence Force Royal Medical Services Military Hospital, West Riffa, Bahrain
- 5Nuffield Department of Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Editorial on the Research Topic
From simulation to the operating theatre: new insights in translational surgery
Technological tools such as highly advanced surgical microscopes, complex microsurgery laboratories, virtual reality, 3-D printing, neuronavigation, surgical robotics, and artificial intelligence (AI) have already become a part of daily life in many surgical specialties. To improve the quality of treatment provided in operating rooms, it is essential that such technologies be adapted to every surgical branch in a timely manner and that surgeons become familiar with them in the surgical laboratory (1). In this way, new scientific and technological developments will be translated for implementation not only in real-life interventions but also in surgical training programs (2). The objective of this Research Topic, therefore, is to bring together surgeons and basic scientists working at the forefront of innovative technologies intended to transform surgical practice. This editorial will summarize the findings of the articles included in this Research Topic.
Three articles in this Research Topic are dedicated to surgical simulation. Culmone et al. report on the development of a new, purely mechanical, programmable physical track called MemoBox to control endoscope-like surgical instruments. They also show the possibility of creating an endoscope with a highly controllable, multisteerable, and precise shaft. The design of advanced snake-like surgical instruments capable of memorizing three-dimensional pathways represents a remarkable step forward in many surgical scenarios, such as colonoscopy, interventional bronchoscopy, or skull base and spinal surgery. The latter subspecialties are particularly challenging because the structures around the surgical channel might be extremely fragile and susceptible to iatrogenic injuries (3). Hence, the learning experience of MemoBox may prove a game changer and expand the horizons of surgical practice. Three-dimensional printing is another groundbreaking technology that promises to enable simulation applications with patient-specific models. In this regard, Takoutsing et al. evaluate the effects of using a new virtual-physical modeling/simulation application tool called UpSurgeOn on the neurosurgery and neuroanatomy training of medical students in Africa. The authors reveal that the use of non-cadaver 3D-printed models could contribute to improving the psychomotor performance of surgeons in microsurgery. The authors also note that most medical students became more familiar with neurosurgery after using this tool; the students gained neurosurgical skills and developed the orientation skills needed during neurosurgical applications. In addition, according to the study, students expressed their satisfaction with the integration of this method into their medical curriculum. Beyond medical education and basic surgical training, the art of surgery requires lifelong learning, creativity, and subspecialization (4–7), as confirmed by Kil et al., who present a simulator for the assessment of suturing skills. They were able to collect data on hand force, motion, and touch applied while suturing to gauge surgeons' skills and dexterity. Combining these data with video information, the vision-activated force measurements provided deeper insights into suturing performance, especially for forces perpendicular and tangential to the suturing direction. Overall, these three studies align well with the surgical community's efforts to accelerate the training curriculum through exercises dedicated to skill acquisition (8). The results of recent surveys sponsored by national and international societies have demonstrated the value of doing so (9) and the COVID-19 pandemic provided opportunities for implementing such methodologies to maintain skills and ensure preparedness for real-life surgery (10).
This Research Topic also confirms the keen attention being paid by the surgical community to digital medicine and the use of data analysis for surgical planning (11, 12). The current landscape of AI in surgical simulations is outlined comprehensively by Park et al. The authors provide numerous examples that demonstrate the effectiveness of AI-powered surgical simulators in clinical practice. Another article from this Research Topic by Zhu et al. presents a successful example of the application of digital technology and finite element analysis in spinal deformities associated with ankylosing spondylitis. Both studies have the merit of using AI-powered prediction models for surgical planning, and they both pivot on examples recently approved or under evaluation by regulatory agencies.
Finally, beyond the educational roles and use as planning tools discussed above, we need to recognize that emerging technologies are already reducing the cost of medical care. Encarnacion Ramirez et al. studied the effectiveness of using a self-made, low-cost exoscope as an alternative to a conventional operating microscope in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. The authors conclude that the exoscope is a safe and effective alternative with great ergonomics, comfort, simplicity, and low-cost advantages; hence, it could expand the options for low-cost microsurgery in less resourced countries.
In summary, it is important to highlight that this Research Topic, including four original research studies, one clinical trial, and one perspective article, has important implications for patient safety. Surgical safety is a global health issue; unsafe surgery leads to increased patient morbidity/mortality, legal claims against surgeons, and a distrust of physicians (13, 14). The evolution of simulators in surgical specialties promises to have a positive impact on the training of residents and patient safety, and the use of new technologies discussed in this Research Topic to provide better care in low- and middle-income countries represents a source of hope for the future of our global surgery community. While a roadmap for future endeavors in surgical practice should also touch upon other groundbreaking discoveries in the field of basic sciences, such as nanomedicine and biomedical engineering, which are translatable to the field of intraoperative imaging (15) and postoperative therapies (16), the articles included in this Research Topic allow us to obtain a rich overview on equally relevant aspects of digital medicine and surgical simulation. Altogether those developing areas will certainly revolutionize standard operating procedures in many surgical subspecialties, we are therefore confident that this Research Topic will become a valuable reference to our readers and that it will arouse their interest towards the future of surgery.
Author contributions
NB: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ET: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CZ: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AS: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MG: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Yaşargil MG. A legacy of microneurosurgery: memoirs, lessons, and axioms. Neurosurgery. (1999) 45:1025–92. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199911000-00014
2. Stienen MN, Freyschlag CF, Schaller K, Meling T, Neurosurgeons EY, Committee ET. Procedures performed during neurosurgery residency in Europe. Acta Neurochir. (2020) 162:2303–11. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04513-4
3. Chibbaro S, Cebula H, Aldea S, Baussart B, Tigan L, Todeschi J, et al. Endonasal endoscopic odontoidectomy in ventral diseases of the craniocervical junction: results of a multicenter experience. World Neurosurg. (2017) 106:382–93. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.148
4. Fava A, Gorgoglione N, De Angelis M. Esposito V, di Russo P. Key role of microsurgical dissections on cadaveric specimens in neurosurgical training: setting up a new research anatomical laboratory and defining neuroanatomical milestones. Front Surg. (2023) 10:1145881. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1145881
5. Lefevre E, Ganau M, Zaed I, de Macedo Machado-Filho G, Scibilia A, Mallereau CH, et al. Learning curve and influencing factors of performing microsurgical anastomosis: a laboratory prospective study. Neurosurg Rev. (2022) 45:3271–80. doi: 10.1007/s10143-022-01856-7
6. Balak N, Baran O, Denli Yalvac ES, Esen Aydin A, Kumbasar A, Tanriover N. Cervical oblique corpectomy: revitalizing the underused surgical approach with step-by-step simulation in cadavers. J Craniofac Surg. (2022) 33:337–43. doi: 10.1097/scs.0000000000007909
7. Akdemir H, Aktas B, Simsek AT, Calis F, Balak N. Proposal for a spiral tube piece in the design of ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Childs Nerv Syst. (2023) 39:9–11. doi: 10.1007/s00381-022-05727-w
8. Robertson FC, Stapleton CJ, Coumans JCE, Nicolosi F, Vooijs M, Blitz S, et al. Applying objective metrics to neurosurgical skill development with simulation and spaced repetition learning. J Neurosurg. (2023) 1–9. doi: 10.3171/2023.1.Jns222651 [Epub ahead of print]
9. Zoli M, Bongetta D, Raffa G, Somma T, Zoia C, Della Pepa GM. Young neurosurgeons and technology: survey of young neurosurgeons section of Italian society of neurosurgery (Societa Italiana di Neurochirurgia, SINch). World Neurosurg. (2022) 162:e436–56. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.022
10. Zoia C, Raffa G, Somma T, Della Pepa GM, La Rocca G, Zoli M, et al. COVID-19 and neurosurgical training and education: an Italian perspective. Acta Neurochir. (2020) 162:1789–94. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04460-0
11. Sboarina A, Foroni RI, Minicozzi A, Antiga L, Lupidi F, Longhi M, et al. Software for hepatic vessel classification: feasibility study for virtual surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. (2010) 5:39–48. doi: 10.1007/s11548-009-0380-4
12. Zaed I, Chibbaro S, Ganau M, Tinterri B, Bossi B, Peschillo S, et al. Simulation and virtual reality in intracranial aneurysms neurosurgical training: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Sci. (2022) 66:494–500. doi: 10.23736/s0390-5616.22.05526-6
13. Balak N, Broekman MLD, Mathiesen T. Ethics in contemporary health care management and medical education. J Eval Clin Pract. (2020) 26:699–706. doi: 10.1111/jep.13352
14. Tisell M, Balak N. Surgical training. In: Honeybul S, editors. Ethics in neurosurgical practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2020). p. 54–63.
15. Ganau M, Syrmos NC, D'Arco F, Ganau L, Chibbaro S, Prisco L, et al. Enhancing contrast agents and radiotracers performance through hyaluronic acid-coating in neuroradiology and nuclear medicine. Hell J Nucl Med. (2017) 20:166–8. doi: 10.1967/s002449910558
Keywords: microsurgical laboratory, operating theater, surgical simulation, surgical simulation models, virtual reality, surgery, surgical laboratory, surgical innovation
Citation: Balak N, Tsianaka E, Zoia C, Sekhar A and Ganau M (2023) Editorial: From simulation to the operating theatre: new insights in translational surgery. Front. Med. Technol. 5:1282248. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2023.1282248
Received: 23 August 2023; Accepted: 14 September 2023;
Published: 21 September 2023.
Edited and Reviewed by: Dinesh Kumar, RMIT University, Australia
© 2023 Balak, Tsianaka, Zoia, Sekhar and Ganau. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Naci Balak drnacibalak@yahoo.com
†ORCID Naci Balak orcid.org/0000-0002-2395-0004 Eleni Tsianaka orcid.org/0000-0003-4293-8315 Cesare Zoia orcid.org/0000-0001-7304-6120 Mario Ganau orcid.org/0000-0002-8676-1147