Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 01 March 2021
Sec. Stroke
This article is part of the Research Topic Sporadic Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases: Pathogenic Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutic Approaches View all 7 articles

Post-stroke Cognition at 1 and 3 Years Is Influenced by the Location of White Matter Hyperintensities in Patients With Lacunar Stroke

  • 1Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, UK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • 2College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • 3Academic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • 4Centre for Rural Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom

Lacunar strokes are a common type of ischemic stroke. They are known to have long-term cognitive deficits, but the influencing factors are still largely unknown. We investigated if the location of the index lacunar stroke or regional WMH and their change at 1 year could predict the cognitive performance at 1 and 3 years post-stroke in lacunar stroke patients. We used lacunar lesion location and WMH-segmented data from 118 patients, mean age 64.9 who had a brain MRI scan soon after presenting with symptoms, of which 88 had a repeated scan 12 months later. Premorbid intelligence (National Adult Reading Test) and current intelligence [Addenbrooke's Cognitive Exam-Revised (ACE-R)] were measured at 1, 12, and 36 months after the stroke. ANCOVA analyses adjusting for baseline cognition/premorbid intelligence, vascular risk factors, age, sex and total baseline WMH volume found that the recent small subcortical infarcts (RSSI) in the internal/external capsule/lentiform nucleus and centrum semiovale did not predict cognitive scores at 12 and 36 months. However, RSSI location moderated voxel-based associations of WMH change from baseline to 1 year with cognitive scores at 1 and 3 years. WMH increase in the external capsule, intersection between the anterior limb of the internal and external capsules, and optical radiation, was associated with worsening of ACE-R scores 1 and 3 years post-stroke after accounting for the location of the index infarct, age and baseline cognition.

Introduction

Lacunar strokes make up 20–30% of all ischemic strokes (1). Despite smaller in size than most cortical strokes, they have been associated with long-term disability, physical (2), gait, and balance impairments (3), and progressive motor deficits, these defined as the deterioration of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) motor score ≥ 1 during the first 7 days after admission (4). After a lacunar stroke, there is also often a deterioration in cognitive function and memory (5), increased occurrence of depression (6), reduced spatial awareness (7, 8), and dementia progression (9). However, the impact of lacunar infarct on cognition alone is still unclear. Two studies reported no association between lacunar infarcts and subjective memory complaints (10, 11) while another reported an association specifically with infarcts located in the basal ganglia (12), thus suggesting that lacunar infarct location is important in post-stroke cognition.

The general impact of infarct location on cognition has been studied in relation to stroke lesion volume (13), shape (14), white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume (15), post-stroke depression and behavioral disorders (16). A large multi-center study found that infarcts (i.e., cortical and subcortical) affecting the basal ganglia and internal capsule were associated with impairment of global cognition (17), in a sample of 878 patients with ischemic stroke. Ischemic strokes' lesions in both brain hemispheres have been associated with lower performances in visuospatial and executive functions (7). Left hemisphere stroke lesions have been associated with higher incidences of depression (18); and behavioral changes post-stroke have been correlated to changes within specific brain regions (16, 19). However, spatial associations of ischemic lesions with cognition vary with time. A study on 76 stroke patients reported a spatial pattern of acute ischemic lesion clusters associated with cognitive outcome at 1–3 months post-stroke being no longer associated with outcome at 1 year (15).

Specifically the effect of lacunar infarct location in post-stroke cognition remains poorly understood. Added to confounding factors in the classification (20), manifestation and recognition (21) of lacunar strokes, variations in their evolution [i.e., cavitation, disappearance, progression to a WMH (22)] limit attempts to understand their impact on cognition. Lacunar stroke lesions are a manifestation of small vessel disease (SVD), and present together with other neuroradiological features like enlarged perivascular spaces, brain microbleeds and WMH. The latter is thought to be a main indicator of SVD severity. While the effect of WMH volume at the time of stroke is a well-established predictor of cognition post-stroke (2325), the impact of the location of WMH combined with that of the acute stroke lesion, or of WMH change after the stroke, on the post-stroke cognitive outcome of patients with lacunar stroke is still unknown. After a minor stroke some WMH increase while some regress (26). Improvements in the prediction of cognitive and brain ischemic changes after a lacunar stroke could help to target future treatment.

The aims of this study are to: (1) evaluate the influence of lacunar stroke lesion location on cognition over a 3 year period after the lacunar stroke; and (2) explore the effect of WMH spatial distribution and change in the year after stroke on cognition, accounting for the location of the acute lacunar infarct. Given that symptomatic recent small subcortical infarcts (RSSI) are mainly located in the vicinities of the corticospinal tracts (27), related with motor and sensory functions, we hypothesized that RSSI location alone would not be associated with cognition. However, we hypothesize that stroke lesion location will differentially influence the association between the spatial distribution of WMH change at 1 year and post-stroke cognition, accounting for vascular risk factors and age at the time of stroke. In other words, we hypothesize that RSSI location will have an indirect effect in post-stroke cognition in patients with lacunar stroke.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

We analyzed imaging, cognitive and clinical data from all patients presenting prospectively to a regional hospital with lacunar stroke syndrome (n = 118, 67 males, 51 females) during the years 2010 until 2013, who participated in a longitudinal study of mechanisms of lacunar stroke (28). Patients were excluded if they lacked the capacity to consent, had a medical condition that made follow-up clinical assessment unlikely or impossible, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) baseline examination did not confirm the stroke diagnosis, or if had severe renal impairments. This analysis further excludes patients that presented with a cortical (i.e., non-lacunar) acute stroke. Protocols for the primary study were approved by the Lothian Ethics of Medical Research Committee (REC 09/81101/54) and NHS Lothian R+D Office (2009/W/NEU/14), on the 29th of October 2009 (28, 29).

Vascular Risk Factors

Our analyses considered medically-diagnosed hypertension (yes, no), hyperlipidemia (yes, no), and smoker status (current, recent i.e., <1 year, non-smoker, ex-smoker i.e., more than 1 year) and diabetic status (yes, no), collected at diagnosis.

MRI Acquisition

All MRI scans were acquired in a 1.5T GE Signa Horizon HDxt clinical scanner (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI, USA) operating in research mode and using a self-shielding gradient set with maximum gradient of 33 mT/m and an 8-channel phased-array head coil (30). We use data derived from analyzing diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR), T2-, T1-, and T2*-weighted MRI, acquired with identical protocols soon after presenting to hospital with acute stroke symptoms and 1 year after (29). Imaging data were not acquired at the 3 year time-point.

Image Analysis

All image analysis was performed blinded to clinical, cognitive and other outcome data. All segmentations were done in a common image space patient-specific, to which baseline and 1 year image sequences were co-registered using the linear registration tool from the FMRIB Software Library (FSL-FLIRT) (31).

Stroke Subtype and Lesion Location

All MRI were assessed by an experienced neuroradiologist who coded the location, type, distribution and size of all infarcts, new and old, and their change on MRI at 1 year (i.e., if cavitated, disappeared, increased, or decreased in size) (22, 30). We only used the type and location of the recent and old subcortical infarcts in our analyses, coded as per Wardlaw and Sellar (32) and The IST-3 Collaborative Group (33) by an experienced neuroradiologist (JMW) (proforma available from www.ed.ac.uk/edinburgh-imaging/analysis-tools/stroke). The anatomical locations were: internal and external capsule/lentiform nucleus, internal border zone, centrum semiovale, thalamus, brainstem, cerebellum, and optical radiation.

WMH and Stroke Lesion Volumes

We segmented the WMH and stroke lesions at baseline and follow-up following the protocol from Valdes Hernandez et al. (30). Briefly, stroke lesions (old and new), were segmented semi-automatically on FLAIR, using thresholding combined with a region-growing algorithm (34) in AnalyzeTM 11.0 (https://analyzedirect.com/). WMH and other brain tissues were segmented using a multispectral approach (30). Volumes were recorded at baseline and 1 year follow up. For statistical analysis, volumes, obtained from the binary masks, were calculated as a percentage in the intracranial volume (% ICV). This was also segmented semi-automatically on co-registered baseline T2*-weighted images using also AnalyzeTM 11.0 software.

Voxel-Based Analysis

All T1-weighted images were semi-rigidly mapped in the standard space (35) using non-linear registration (http://sourceforge.net/projects/niftyreg/) through TractoR (http://www.tractor-mri.org.uk/diffusion-processing), and the transformation matrix was applied to the WMH binary masks. We generated a map of WMH change from baseline to 1 year for each patient coding the voxels in three classes as those with new WMH at 1 year, those with WMH at both time points, and those in which WMH disappeared at 1 year. We, then, generated a 4D array after concatenating the WMH change maps from all patients for statistical analysis.

Cognitive Assessment

We used the total scores of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) and the National Adult Reading Test (NART) applied 1 to 3 months after the initial stroke (baseline), 1 year later (1 year follow-up) and 3 years after the initial stroke (3 year follow-up) (36, 37).

Statistical Analysis

Using MATLAB R2019b and Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS version 25), we performed analysis of frequencies of RSSI and old small subcortical infarcts per anatomical region. We compared age, baseline imaging and vascular risk factors of patients who provided cognitive data at each time point against those who did not provide these data using the Mann-Whitney U test (i.e., non-parametric test of two independent non-paired groups).

We used analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to explore the effect of the RSSI location in cognitive scores at 1 and 3 years follow-up examinations. In the models, post-stroke cognition was the outcome variable, and baseline cognition and presence/absence of RSSI at specific locations were the predictors. Models were adjusted for age, baseline WMH volume, premorbid cognition (NART) (38), and vascular risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and smoker status). Given reduction in sample size at follow-up examinations bootstrapping was performed.

We implemented voxel-wise regression models to explore whether WMH change influenced post-stroke cognition at 1 and 3 years, accounting for the acute stroke lesion (RSSI) location, coded to include location of primary and/or secondary DWI-positive clusters, using a machine-learning approach. We used the MATLAB function “fitrlinear” to fit a regularized support vector machine regression model with a ridge penalty type optimized through a stochastic gradient descent approach for accuracy. This approach was selected due to the high-dimensionality and sparsity of the predictor data. The code is available and documented in (39). The outcome variable was the ACE-R scores at 1 or 3 years post-stroke. Covariates were age, premorbid cognition (i.e., baseline NART scores) and the RSSI location code. Analyses were repeated (1) adding vascular risk factors, (2) not considering the RSSI location but instead the WMH volume at baseline, (3) considering RSSI location, baseline WMH volume and number of lacunes, and (4) considering, in addition, the volume of old stroke lesions, as covariates in the models. The regularization term strength was set at 1/47.

Results

Sample Characteristics

Demographics

From the 118 patients that had an MRI at baseline, 68 provided cognitive data. From the 90 that had an MRI at 1 year follow-up, 88 had valid MRI-derived data (two MRI scans were incomplete) and 63 provided cognitive data. Sixty six patients provided cognitive data 3 years after the stroke (Table 1). Reasons for absence of data are provided in (40) and McHutchison et al. (36). The mean age of the sample at baseline was 64.93 (SD 11.75, 95% CI [62.76 67.091]) years old and did not differ from the age of subsamples tested at 1 and 3 years (64.79 (10.87 [62.47 67.10]) years old and 64.25 (10.45 [61.68 66.83]) years old, respectively) (Table 1). The proportion of males to females in all three recordings was similar with marginally more males in the two first visits.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Sample characteristics.

Brain Measurements

Volumes of the index lacunar infarct and old infarcts lesions in the subsamples that provided data at the three time points were not different. The subsample that provided cognitive data at 3 years had smaller WMH median volume (p = 0.024, Table 1, see Supplementary Table 1 for missing values analysis). In a year-period median WMH volume increased while index stroke lesion volume decreased.

Cognitive Scores

The median scores for both ACE-R and NART tests followed the same pattern between the three time points: a modest increase (not statistically significant) from baseline (ACE-R = 90 [81.5–94], NART = 38 [29–42]) (median [Q1–Q3]) to the 1 year follow-up (ACE-R = 92 [84.75–96], NART = 41 [33.25–45]) followed by a decrease (also not statistically significant) in both values at the 3 year follow-up (ACE-R = 91 [84–96], NART = 32.5 [24–38.5]). Median baseline cognitive scores of the subsamples that provided data at baseline, 1 and 3 years were not different.

Vascular Risk Factors

Approximately 70% of the patients were hypertensive and around 60% had hyperlipidemia at baseline. These proportions did not change in the subsamples followed up at 1 and 3 years (Table 1). However, the proportion of current smokers was 39% in the baseline sample, 37.5% in the sample that provided data at 1 year and 31.8% in the sample that provided cognitive data at 3 years. The proportion of diabetics also followed similar tendency: 10.2% at baseline, 9% in the 1 year sample and 4.5% in the 3 year sample (Table 1) (see Supplementary Table 1 for missing values analysis).

Small Subcortical Infarct Lesions—Incidence at Baseline

From the 118 patients presenting with a lacunar stroke syndrome, 79 had acute lesions (RSSI) identifiable in brain MRI. One patient had two RSSI lesion clusters in the centrum semiovale in the same cerebral hemisphere, and one patient had a bilateral RSSI in the internal/external capsule. Three patients had additional cortical DWI-positive lesions. One patient had an RSSI lesion cluster in the internal/external capsule and other in the brainstem. The rest had only one RSSI lesion cluster. Old small subcortical infarcts (lacunes) were identified in 77/118 patients. Multiple lacunes were identified in 20/118 patients. The highest frequency of RSSI and lacunes was in the internal and external capsule/lentiform nucleus and centrum semiovale (Table 1). The RSSI and lacunes were distributed fairly evenly in left and right hemispheres.

RSSI Location and Cognitive Scores at 1 and 3 Years

Figure 1 shows the distribution of the cognitive scores at the three time points for patients with the RSSI in the two locations with more incidence in the sample. The cognitive scores across years and between patient groups were not different.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Boxplots of the distributions of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) scores in the sample at the three time-points, for the RSSI locations with most data: internal/external capsule/lentiform nucleus (top row), and centrum semiovale (bottom row). ACE-R scores range from 0 to 100.

For patients with the RSSI in the internal/external capsule/lentiform nucleus (n = 21), baseline ACE-R scores (93 [89–96.5] (median [Q1–Q3])) increased at 1 year follow-up examination (95 [89–97.5]), but experienced an overall decrease at 3 years (91 [85–99]). Interestingly, patients with the RSSI in this location at the right cerebral hemisphere experienced, overall, a gradual decrease from baseline across the 3 year period (i.e., baseline ACE-R 95 [84.5–98.5]; 1 year ACE-R 93.5 [86–99.5] and 3 year ACE-R 87 [83–100]) (Figure 1, upper row).

Patients with the RSSI in the centrum semiovale at the right hemisphere had, overall, higher ACE-R scores at the three-time-point examinations that those who had the RSSI in the centrum semiovale at the left hemisphere (Figure 1, bottom row). Although the overall pattern of the ACE-R scores over the 3 year period resembles that of the patients with the RSSI in the internal/external capsule/lentiform nucleus, the median change in the cognitive scores from baseline to 1 year follow-up was not as pronounced (Figure 1, bottom row).

Table 2 shows the results of the ANCOVA analyses for RSSI at the internal/external capsule/lentiform nucleus and centrum semiovale, per-cerebral hemisphere and in both hemispheres combined. RSSI in these two locations did not predict total ACE-R scores at 1 or 3 years. There were insufficient patients with RSSI in other locations to conduct this analysis (see Table 1).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. One-way analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) results showing baseline predictors for potential change in ACE-R cognition score from baseline at 1 and 3 years follow-up for RSSI in the only two locations in which this analysis was possible due to sample size (see Table 1): internal/external capsule/lentiform nucleus (i.e., abbreviated as BG as per basal ganglia) and centrum semiovale (i.e., abbreviated as CSO).

Voxel-Wise Association of 1 Year WMH Change and Cognitive Scores at 1 and 3 Years

1 Year WMH Change

Change in WMH in the sample was widespread across a large number of voxels (Figure 2). WMH disappeared mainly in localized clusters of the centrum semiovale and around the ventricles. These regions correspond to those with prevalence of old lacunes and ventricular enlargement (Figure 2, bottom row).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Axial slices of probability distribution maps of WMH change from baseline to 1 year overlaid on the brain study template. The upper row shows the baseline probability distribution of WMH in red with probability distribution of WMH change in yellow superimposed at 50% transparency. The bottom row shows the probability distribution of WMH change in red with the probability distribution of only the WMH that disappeared at follow-up added in yellow.

Association Between WMH Change and Cognitive Scores at 1 Year

Figure 3 shows the non-standardized voxel-based associations (B-values) between WMH change and ACE-R scores 1 year post-stroke from different models. While vascular risk factors practically did not influence these associations (upper vs. middle rows in Figure 3, Table 3), RSSI location did (Figure 3, bottom row vs. the upper and middle rows). Not accounting for RSSI location or lacunes in the model (Figure 3, bottom row) slightly increased the strength (Table 3) and extent of the associations and influenced the pattern of their spatial distribution.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Axial slices of the study brain template with overlays showing the voxel-wise association (non-standardized B-values) between ACE-R at 1 year (outcome variable) and spatial distribution of WMH change (main predictor) in models that accounted for age, premorbid cognition and: (A) baseline WMH volume, number of lacunes, RSSI location and vascular risk factors (upper row), (B) baseline WMH volume, number of lacunes and RSSI location (middle row), (C) baseline WMH volume and vascular risk factors (bottom row). Negative B-values are shown in yellow and positive B-values (no WMH change or WMH disappearance → reduction of ACE-R scores at 1 year) in cyan. These results were obtained using in the model the RSSI location of the primary DWI positive cluster.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Median, interquartile range (IQR) and extreme B values of the voxel-wise effect of WMH change in cognition at 1 and 3 years post-stroke.

Association Between 1 Year WMH Change and Cognitive Scores at 3 Years

Regardless of considering or not the RSSI location as covariate in the models, the strength of the associations between WMH change and cognition generally increased at 3 years with respect to 1 year (see Figure 4, Table 3), especially in voxels with no change or disappearance of WMH at 1 year, the latter mainly due to tissue loss (voxels in cyan in Figure 4), in the splenium of the corpus callosum and at the intersection between the anterior limb of the internal and external capsules. Only in the external capsule and occipito-parietal locations contiguous to the lateral ventricles, the associations were stronger at 1 year than 3 years after the stroke. To add the volume of old stroke lesions as covariate in the models weakened the median strength of the voxel-based associations at 1 year but did not make any difference at 3 years (Table 3).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Axial slices of the study brain template with overlays showing the voxel-wise association (non-standardized B-values) of ACE-R (outcome variable) at 1 year (upper row in both panels) and 3 year post stroke (bottom row in both panels) with spatial distribution of WMH change (main predictor). Models accounted for age, premorbid cognition and: (A) baseline WMH volume, number of lacunes, RSSI location and vascular risk factors (upper panel), (B) baseline WMH volume and vascular risk factors (bottom panel). Negative B-values are shown in yellow and positive B-values (no WMH change or WMH disappearance → reduction of ACE-R scores at 1 year) in cyan. These results were obtained using in the model the RSSI location of the primary DWI positive cluster.

RSSI location did not influence the associations between WMH change and cognition at 3 years as markedly as at 1 year post-stroke, except in the region of the lentiform nucleus (Figure 4). In models that only accounted for RSSI location, age and pre-morbid cognition, clusters of WMH change negatively and more strongly associated with ACE-R at 1 and 3 years were mainly in the external capsule, intersection between the anterior limb of the internal and external capsules, and optical radiation (Supplementary Figures 1, 2).

Discussion

Main Findings

In our sample of patients who presented to the clinic with a mild stroke syndrome of type lacunar, the location of the acute lesion in the two locations with more incidence: internal/external capsule/lentiform nucleus and centrum semiovale, did not predict the general cognitive outcome at 1 or 3 years after. However, lacunar stroke lesion location moderated the association between WMH evolution (i.e., appearance and disappearance) 1 year post-stroke, and cognition at 1 and 3 years.

This underlines previous evidence that post-stroke cognitive impairment in lacunar stroke is, in general, unrelated to the location of the lesion, but instead related to the extent of the underlying small vessel disease pathology which is often diffuse throughout the subcortical tissues (41). This is not surprising, given that lacunar stroke, by definition, does not cause higher cortical dysfunction. Clinicians treating patients with lacunar stroke should consider all participants to be at risk of cognitive impairment.

Despite the acute lesions being located mainly in the centrum semiovale, internal/external capsule/lentiform nucleus in our sample, we can't assert whether a larger balanced sample in terms of RSSI locations would yield different results or not. In a sample of 182 patients with probable vascular dementia presenting infratentorial vascular abnormalities (i.e., 65.4% had focal infratentorial vascular lesions and 35.7% had diffuse pontine vascular abnormalities hyperintense on T2-weighted images), these were not associated with cognition or cognitive decline (42), but much larger samples are needed to confirm these findings.

The results of our voxel-based analysis WMH are in agreement with a previous study of patients with acute ischemic lesions in the left cerebral hemisphere, which concluded that the corpus callosum, corona radiata, and posterior thalamic radiation could be strategic substrates for short-term and long-term post-stroke cognitive impairment (15). In our sample of lacunar stroke patients we also found that some WMH clusters strongly associated with cognition 1 year post-stroke differ from some others that are rather more strongly associated with the cognitive performance 3 years after the stroke, perhaps reflecting a complex dynamic in WMH evolution influencing different cognitive functions.

Secondary Findings

Patients with the RSSI in the centrum semiovale in the right hemisphere had greater increase in ACE-R scores at 1 year than those with the RSSI at the left hemisphere, in agreement with previous study on cognitive recovery 2 years post-stroke (43). However, this hemispheral difference did not reach statistical significance and did not hold for the longer term cognitive outcome (i.e., 3 years), which was poorer than baseline in general. The apparent cognitive improvement at 1 year post-stroke has been reported before. A study of silent brain infarcts in 1,015 individuals aged 60–90 years old, found an increase in the cognitive performance at the second examination (equivalent to our 1 year follow up) (44). Other two studies including the sample analyzed here and a similar number of patients with mild-to moderate cortical strokes found similar trends overall: a slightly better cognitive performance at 1 year and an overall cognitive decline at 3 years regardless of stroke subtype (36, 40), in agreement with previous investigations in the stroke literature (45). Declining cognition is a characteristic of aging and presents a challenge to our study as with a population average of 65 (at baseline) it could be difficult to separate cognitive decline due to lacunar stroke than the decline caused by aging despite all our models having accounted for age. Where possible studying a younger population of stroke patients would enable the separation of age-related cognitive decline.

Strengths and Limitations

The uniformity in assessing the population in terms of MRI acquisition and processing protocols, the application of well-established guidelines, the use of state-of-the-art imaging processing methods and the detailed clinical and neuroradiological assessments are strengths of this study. The machine-learning voxel-based approach used, made publicly available, is also a strength. The sensitivity analysis considering the RSSI location of (a) only the main DWI-positive RSSI clusters and (b) all, including secondary, DWI-positive lesion clusters, confirming the overall conclusions of the study is another strength. Although moderate in size, our sample was affected by the reduction in the number of patients attending follow-up assessments and missing cognitive data in all time points (see Table 1). Analyses of RSSI location per brain hemisphere and cognition in specific domains were limited due to reduced sample-size at the follow-up examinations and skeweness of the data. We, therefore, could not include all predictors of potential interest (e.g., brain microbleeds) to avoid overfitting in our models. Moreover, patients who provided cognitive data at 3 years were healthier at baseline (i.e., higher proportion of no smokers and ex-smokers, and less WMH volume). It is not uncommon that subsamples are healthier with length of follow-up. Although it seems reasonable to think that patients who dropped out had greater cognitive decline, they could not be included in the analysis. Another limitation to the study was the lack of control group for direct comparison between age-matched individuals, which would have provided a better picture of the influence of the acute lacunar stroke in the cognitive changes at 1 and 3 years after the baseline examination.

Future Directions

Future research should aim to increase the follow-up period of the study beyond the 3 year period studied here. In addition, efforts should be made to increase the sample size of lacunar stroke patients, to increase the reliability and power of the statistical analysis. Creating an international database could provide a promising solution to the small sample sizes which most of the recent literature on lacunar or other mild cortical strokes lists as a limitation, initiated either as a new project or as a branch of a project/consortia like the PLORAS database (46) or the Meta VCI Map consortium (17). A range of cognitive tests has been used by different studies making comparison between studies challenging. There is evidence of the combined benefits of using a domain-specific cognitive test (e.g., ACE-R) and premorbid intelligence test (e.g., NART) (38). Unified recommendations are needed for accurate estimates in the study of cognition after stroke. The development of a digital resource that could facilitate patient cognitive, focal and non-focal symptoms screening at home feeding to a secure data heaven for follow-up and research purposes will be also beneficial. This could be particularly useful when looking to study cognitive performance over several years and would enable better prediction of cognitive changes at different times over a longer follow-up period.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by The Lothian Ethics of Medical Research Committee (REC 09/81101/54) and NHS Lothian R+D Office (2009/W/NEU/14), on the 29th of October 2009. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

MV: image processing and analysis, data analysis, study design, and writing and approving the manuscript. TG-M: data analysis and writing and approving the manuscript. FC: statistical analysis, editing, and revising and approving the manuscript. MT and PA: image protocol design, image data quality control, editing, and revising and approving the manuscript. SM: patient recruitment, data generation, application of cognitive tests, clinical examination, editing, and revising and approving the manuscript. JW: study design, project supervision, funding, editing, and revising and approving the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

MV was funded by Row Fogo Charitable Trust (Grant No. BROD.FID3668413). Patient recruitment, data acquisition, and processing were funded by the Wellcome Trust (Ref No. WT088134/Z/09/A). Fondation Leducq (Perivascular Spaces Transatlantic Network of Excellence), EU Horizon 2020 (SVDs@Target) and the MRC UK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Edinburgh (Wardlaw programme) partially fund our research.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.634460/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Norrving B. Long-term prognosis after lacunar infarction. Lancet Neurol. (2003) 2:238–45. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00352-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. (2009) 8:741–54. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Baezner H, Blahak C, Poggesi A, Pantoni L, Inzitari D, Chabriat H, et al. Association of gait and balance disorders with age-related white matter changes: the LADIS Study. Neurology. (2008) 70:935–42. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000305959.46197.e6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Steinke W, Ley SC. Lacunar stroke is the major cause of progressive motor deficits. Stroke. (2002) 33:1510–6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000016326.78014.FE

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Arboix A. Lacunar infarct and cognitive decline. Expert Rev Neurother. (2011) 11:1251–4. doi: 10.1586/ern.11.118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Egeto P, Fischer CE, Ismail Z, Smith EE, Schweizer TA. Lacunar stroke, deep white matter disease and depression: a meta-analysis. Int Psychogeriatr. (2014) 26:1101–9. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214000568

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Sagnier S, Munsch F, Bigourdan A, Debruxelles S, Poli M, Renou P, et al. The influence of stroke location on cognitive and mood impairment. A voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2019) 28:1236–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.01.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Wu Y.-F, Wu W.-B, Liu Q.-P, He W.-W, Ding H, Nedelska Z, et al. Presence of lacunar infarctions is associated with the spatial navigation impairment in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a DTI study. Oncotarget. (2016) 7:78310–19. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13409

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Sigurdsson S, Aspelund T, Kjartansson O, Gudmundsson EF, Jonsdottir MK, Eiriksdottir G, et al. Incidence of brain infarcts, cognitive change, and risk of dementia in the general population: the AGES-Reykjavik Study (Age Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study). Stroke. (2017) 48:2353–60. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017357

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Van Norden AG, Van Uden IW, de Laat KF, Gons RAR, Kessels RPC, van Dijk EJ, et al. Cerebral microbleeds are related to subjective cognitive failures: the RUN DMC study. Neurobiol Aging. (2013) 34:2225–30. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.03.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Van Rooden S, Van den Berg-Huysmans AA, Croll PH, Labadie G, Hayes JM, Viviano R, et al. Subjective cognitive decline is associated with greater white matter hyperintensity volume. J Alzheimer's Dis. (2018) 66:1283–94. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180285

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Narasimhalu K, Wiryasaputra L, Sitoh YY, Kandiah N. Post-stroke subjective cognitive impairment is associated with acute lacunar infarcts in the basal ganglia. Eur J Neurol. (2013) 20:547–51. doi: 10.1111/ene.12032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Thye M, Mirman D. Relative contributions of lesion location and lesion size to predictions of varied language deficits in post-stroke aphasia. NeuroImage Clin. (2018) 20:1129–38. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.10.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Mantero V, Filizzolo M, Botto E, Giussani G, Aliprandi A, Basilico P, et al. Size, shape and location of lacunar strokes and correlation with risk factors. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. (2020) 190:105665. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105665

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Zhao L, Wong A, Luo Y, Liu W, Chu WWC, Abrigo JM, et al. The additional contribution of white matter hyperintensity location to post-stroke cognitive impairment: insights from a multiple-lesion symptom mapping study. Front Neurosci. (2018) 12:290. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00290

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Corbetta M, Ramsey L, Callejas A, Baldassarre A, Hacker CD, Siegel JS, et al. Common behavioral clusters and subcortical anatomy in stroke. Neuron. (2015) 85:927–41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Weaver NA, Zhao L, Biesbroek JM, Kuijf HJ, Aben HP, Bae HJ, et al. The Meta VCI Map consortium for meta-analyses on strategic lesion locations for vascular cognitive impairment using lesion-symptom mapping: Design and multicenter pilot study. Alzheimer's Dement Diagn Assess Dis Monit. (2019) 11:310–26. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2019.02.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Grajny K, Pyata H, Spiegel K, Lacey EH, Xing S, Brophy C, et al. Depression symptoms in chronic left hemisphere stroke are related to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex damage. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. (2016) 28:292–8. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.16010004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Gozzi SA, Wood AG, Chen J, Vaddadi K, Phan TG. Imaging predictors of poststroke depression: methodological factors in voxel-based analysis. BMJ Open. (2014) 4:e004948. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004948

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Gan R, Sacco RL, Kargman DE, Roberts JK, Boden-Albala B, Gu Q. Testing the validity of the lacunar hypothesis: the northern Manhattan stroke study experience. Neurology. (1997) 48:1204–11. doi: 10.1212/WNL.48.5.1204

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Mead GE, Lewis S, Wardlaw JM, Dennis MS, Warlow CP. Should computed tomography appearance of lacunar stroke influence patient management? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (1999) 67:682–4. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.67.5.682

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Gattringer T, Valdes Hernandez M, Heye A, Armitage PA, Makin S, Chappell F, et al. Predictors of lesion cavitation after recent small subcortical stroke. Transl Stroke Res. (2020) 11:402–11. doi: 10.1007/s12975-019-00741-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Prins ND, Scheltens P. White matter hyperintensities, cognitive impairment and dementia: an update. Nat Rev Neurol. (2015) 11:157–65. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Kang HJ, Stewart R, Park MS, Bae KY, Kim SW, Kim JM, et al. White matter hyperintensities and functional outcomes at 2 weeks and 1 year after stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. (2013) 35:138–45. doi: 10.1159/000346604

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Georgakis MK, Duering M, Wardlaw JM, Dichgans M. WMH and long-term outcomes in ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. (2019) 92:e1298–308. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007142

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Wardlaw JM, Makin SJ, Valdés Hernández MC, Armitage PA, Heye AK, Chappell FM, et al. Blood-brain barrier failure as a core mechanism in cerebral small vessel disease and dementia: evidence from a cohort study. Alzheimers Dement. (2017) 13:634–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.09.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Valdés Hernández MC, Maconick LC, Muñoz Maniega S, Wang X, Wiseman S, Armitage PA, et al. A comparison of location of acute symptomatic vs. 'silent' small vessel lesions. Int J Stroke. (2015) 10:1044–50. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12558

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Wardlaw JM, Chappell FM, Valdés Hernández M, Makin S, Staals J, Shuler K, et al. White matter hyperintensity reduction and outcomes after minor stroke. Neurology. (2017) 89:1003–10. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004328

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Heye AK, Thrippleton MJ, Chappell FM, Valdés Hernández MC, Armitage PA, Makin SD, et al. Blood pressure and sodium: association with MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. (2016) 36:264–74. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.64

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Valdés Hernández MC, Armitage PA, Thrippleton MJ, Chappell F, Sandeman E, Muñoz Maniega S, et al. Rationale, design and methodology of the image analysis protocol for studies of patients with cerebral small vessel disease and mild stroke. Brain Behav. (2015) 5:e00415. doi: 10.1002/brb3.415

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Jenkinson M, Bannister PR, Brady JM, Smith SM. Improved optimisation for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage. (2002) 17:825–41. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1132

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Wardlaw JM, Sellar R. A simple practical classification of cerebral infarcts on CT and its interobserver reliability. Am J Neuroradiol. (1994) 15:1933–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

33. The IST-3 collaborative group. Association between brain imaging signs, early and late outcomes, and response to intravenous alteplase after acute ischaemic stroke in the third International Stroke Trial (IST-3): secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial, 2015. Lancet Neurol. (2015) 14:485–96. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00012-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Pratt WK. Digital Image Processing, 4th ed. Los Altos, CA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (2007).

Google Scholar

35. Dickie DA, Job DE, Rodriguez González D, Shenkin SD, Wardlaw JM. Use of brain MRI atlases to determine boundaries of age-related pathology: the importance of statistical method. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10:e0127939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127939

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. McHutchison CA, Cvoro V, Makin S, Chappell FM, Shuler K, Wardlaw JM. Functional, cognitive and physical outcomes 3 years after minor lacunar or cortical ischaemic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2019) 90:436–43. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319134

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Makin SDJ. Causes and consequences of lacunar stroke [Ph.D. thesis], Chapter 3. The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom (2017). Available online at: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?did=3anduin=uk.bl.ethos.723885 (accessed January 26, 2021).

Google Scholar

38. Makin S, Doubal F, Shuler K, Chappell F, Staals J, Dennis MS, et al. The impact of early-life intelligence quotient on post stroke cognitive impairment. Eur Stroke J. (2018) 3:145–56. doi: 10.1177/2396987317750517

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Valdés Hernández MC, Smith K, Bastin M, Amft N, Ralston S, Wardlaw J, et al. Brain Network Measures and Spatial Lesion Distribution in a Sample of 47 Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), [dataset]. University of Edinburgh, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences (2019).

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

40. Valdés Hernández MC, Case T, Chappell F, Glatz A, Makin S, Doubal F, et al. Association between striatal brain iron deposition, microbleeds and cognition 1 year after a minor ischaemic stroke. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:1293. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061293

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Wardlaw JM, Smith C, Dichgans M. Small vessel disease: mechanisms and clinical implications. Lancet Neurol. (2019) 18:684–96. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30079-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Bastos Leite AJ, Van der Flier WM, Van Straaten ECW, Scheltens P, Barkhof F. Infratentorial abnormalities in vascular dementia. Infratentorial Abnormal Vasc Dement Stroke. (2006) 37:105–10. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000196984.90718.8a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Hochstenbach JB, den Otter R, Mulder TW. Cognitive recovery after stroke: a 2-year follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2003) 84:1499–504. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00370-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Vermeer SE, Prins ND, den Heijer T, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Breteler MMB. Silent brain infarcts and the risk of dementia and cognitive decline. N Engl J Med. (2003) 348:1215–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022066

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Gottesman RF, Hillis AE. Predictors and assessment of cognitive dysfunction resulting from ischaemic stroke. Lancet Neurol. (2010) 9:895–905. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70164-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Seghier ML, Patel E, Prejawa S, Ramsden S, Selmer A, Lim L, et al. The PLORAS database: a data repository for predicting language outcome and recovery after stroke. Neuroimage. (2016) 124:1208–12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.083

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: recent small subcortical infarct, lacunar, stroke, white matter hyperintensities, cognition

Citation: Valdés Hernández MdC, Grimsley-Moore T, Chappell FM, Thrippleton MJ, Armitage PA, Sakka E, Makin S and Wardlaw JM (2021) Post-stroke Cognition at 1 and 3 Years Is Influenced by the Location of White Matter Hyperintensities in Patients With Lacunar Stroke. Front. Neurol. 12:634460. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.634460

Received: 27 November 2020; Accepted: 05 February 2021;
Published: 01 March 2021.

Edited by:

Zhengqi Lu, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, China

Reviewed by:

Raffaella Valenti, University of Florence, Italy
Jialing Liu, University of California, San Francisco, United States

Copyright © 2021 Valdés Hernández, Grimsley-Moore, Chappell, Thrippleton, Armitage, Sakka, Makin and Wardlaw. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Maria del C. Valdés Hernández, m.valdes-hernan@ed.ac.uk

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.