Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.
Sec. Applied Neuroimaging
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1330203
This article is part of the Research Topic Ultra-low Field MRI scanners – Innovative Technologies and Clinical Feasibility View all 3 articles

Super Resolution using Sparse Sampling at Portable Ultra-Low Field MR

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, United States
  • 2 University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom
  • 3 Hyperfine Inc., Guilford, Connecticut, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Ultra-low field (ULF) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) holds the potential to make MRI more accessible, given its cost-effectiveness, reduced power requirements, and portability. However, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) drops with field strength, necessitating imaging with lower resolution and longer scan times. This study introduces a novel Fourier-based Super Resolution (FouSR) approach, designed to enhance the resolution of ULF MRI images with minimal increase in total scan time.FouSR combines spatial frequencies from two orthogonal ULF images of anisotropic resolution to create an isotropic T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image. We hypothesized that FouSR could effectively recover information from under-sampled slice directions, thereby improving the delineation of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions and other significant anatomical features. Importantly, the FouSR algorithm can be implemented on the scanner with changes to the kspace trajectory.Paired ULF (Hyperfine SWOOP, 0.064 tesla) and high field (Siemens, Skyra, 3 tesla) FLAIR scans were collected on the same day from a phantom and a cohort of 10 participants with MS or suspected MS (6 female; mean±SD age: 44.1±4.1). ULF scans were acquired along both coronal and axial planes, featuring an in-plane resolution of 1.7mm x 1.7mm with a slice thickness of 5mm. FouSR was evaluated against registered ULF coronal and axial scans, their average (ULF Average) and a gold standard SR (ANTs SR).FouSR exhibited higher SNR (47.96±12.6) compared to ULF Coronal (36.7±12.2) and higher lesion conspicuity (0.12±0.06) compared to ULF Axial (0.13±0.07) but did not exhibit any significant differences contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) compared to other methods in patient scans. However, FouSR demonstrated superior image sharpness (0.025±0.0040) compared to all other techniques (ULF Coronal 0.021±0.0037, q=5.9, p-adj=0.011; ULF Axial 0.018±0.0026, q=11.1, p-adj=0.0001; ULF Average 0.019±0.0034, q=24.2, p-adj.<0.0001) and higher lesion sharpness (-0.97±0.31) when compared to the ULF Average (-1.02±0.37, t(543)=-10.174, p=<0.0001). Average blinded qualitative assessment by three experienced MS neurologists showed no significant difference in WML and Sulci or Gyri visualization between FouSR and other methods. FouSR can, in principle, be implemented on the scanner to produce clinically useful FLAIR images at higher resolution on the fly, providing a valuable tool for visualizing lesions and other anatomical structures in MS.

    Keywords: super-resolution, ultra-low field, Multiple Sclerosis, Fourier-transform, reconstruction

    Received: 30 Oct 2023; Accepted: 03 May 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Donnay, Okar, Poorman, Reich and Nair. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Megan Poorman, Hyperfine Inc., Guilford, Connecticut, United States
    Govind Nair, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.