Original Research ARTICLE
Toward literature-based feature selection for diagnostic classification: a meta-analysis of resting-state fMRI in depression
- Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
Information derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during wakeful rest has been introduced as a candidate diagnostic biomarker in unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD). Multiple reports of resting state fMRI in MDD describe group effects. Such prior knowledge can be adopted to pre-select potentially discriminating features for diagnostic classification models with the aim to improve diagnostic accuracy. Purpose of this analysis was to consolidate spatial information about alterations of spontaneous brain activity in MDD, primarily to serve as feature selection for multivariate pattern analysis techniques (MVPA). Thirty two studies were included in final analyses. Coordinates extracted from the original reports were assigned to two categories based on directionality of findings. Meta-analyses were calculated using the non-additive activation likelihood estimation approach with coordinates organized by subject group to account for non-independent samples. Converging evidence revealed a distributed pattern of brain regions with increased or decreased spontaneous activity in MDD. The most distinct finding was hyperactivity/hyperconnectivity presumably reflecting the interaction of cortical midline structures (posterior default mode network components including the precuneus and neighboring posterior cingulate cortices associated with self-referential processing and the subgenual anterior cingulate and neighboring medial frontal cortices) with lateral prefrontal areas related to externally-directed cognition. Other areas of hyperactivity/hyperconnectivity include the left lateral parietal cortex, right hippocampus and right cerebellum whereas hypoactivity/hypoconnectivity was observed mainly in the left temporal cortex, the insula, precuneus, superior frontal gyrus, lentiform nucleus and thalamus. Results are made available in two different data formats to be used as spatial hypotheses in future studies, particularly for diagnostic classification by MVPA.
Mental disorders featuring depression as a predominant symptom and more specifically major depressive disorder (MDD) are important worldwide public health concerns. In recent years significant progress has been achieved regarding the identification of biological correlates and potential neural mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of MDD. These scientific efforts comprise studies of genetic foundations, molecular mechanisms including neurotransmitter systems and structural as well as functional neuroimaging (Kupfer et al., 2012). Thereby candidate neural systems have been identified that support emotion processing, reward seeking, regulate emotion and are therefore presumed to play an important role in MDD. These networks include subcortical as well as cortical (particularly prefrontal and cingulate) brain regions modulated by serotonin and dopamine neurotransmission (Kupfer et al., 2012).
A majority of reported functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies in MDD has applied stimulus-based acquisition protocols. Participants were confronted with predefined stimuli in the scanner, e.g., pictures of emotional faces. Brain activity in response to these stimuli was analyzed (Fitzgerald et al., 2008; Stuhrmann et al., 2011; Delvecchio et al., 2012; Diener et al., 2012; Groenewold et al., 2013). Stimulus-based fMRI requires rather complex experimental setups. In contrast, fMRI at rest, so-called resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI), facilitates the examination of spontaneous neural activity in networks that highly resemble those observed in task-based fMRI (Smith et al., 2009). It necessitates simpler, but nonetheless highly standardized data acquisition procedures (Van Dijk et al., 2010) and has therefore attracted attention by researchers interested in clinical applications of fMRI (Zhang and Raichle, 2010; Lee et al., 2012; Barkhof et al., 2014; Sundermann et al., 2014a).
A broad methodological spectrum for analyses of rs-fMRI data has been developed and there is no standard analysis strategy for group comparisons either. This heterogeneity is reflected in rs-fMRI studies in MDD as well. However, most analyses are either based on regional features or on connectivity of distant brain regions. Typical regional measures include regional homogeneity (ReHo) or the (fractional) amplitude of characteristic low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF or fALFF). Functional connectivity (FC) can be operationalized as the temporal correlation of signal fluctuations in remote brain areas. Conventional FC-analyses are seed-based but FC-analyses in a wider sense include independent component analyses or complex graph theoretical network measures. A minority of studies has applied analyses of effective connectivity (such as Granger causality taking temporal dependencies into account) (Margulies et al., 2010; van den Heuvel and Hulshoff Pol, 2010). Rs-fMRI is increasingly adopted scientifically in subjects with MDD (Wang et al., 2012b; Kühn and Gallinat, 2013). Despite the qualitative similarity of networks observed during task-fMRI and rs-fMRI it has not been firmly established which features of stimulus-related neural correlates of MDD can be sufficiently captured by rs-fMRI. The exact relation of rs-fMRI and other neuroimaging methods at rest including positron emission tomography (PET) is still subject to ongoing research as well (Chetelat et al., 2013; Riedl et al., 2014).
Whereas most neuroimaging studies in MDD focus on disease mechanisms at the group level, there is substantial interest in identifying biomarkers that are clinically applicable as diagnostic tools in single subjects (Mossner et al., 2007; Atluri et al., 2013; Schneider and Prvulovic, 2013). Particularly, important recent approaches for diagnostic classification in various mental disorders are based on the combination of rs-fMRI with multivariate pattern analysis techniques (MVPA) (Klöppel et al., 2011; Orru et al., 2012; Zarogianni et al., 2013; Haller et al., 2014; Sundermann et al., 2014a). MVPA subserves the automated generation of decision rules based on previous experience, labeled training data in this particular case. MVPA approaches integrate information from multiple brain regions with the aim to increase diagnostic power compared to conventional univariate analysis schemes that are used in many fMRI studies (Pereira et al., 2009; Sundermann et al., 2014a). Seminal work in the field of exploring the clinical applicability of rs-fMRI in combination with MVPA has been done in subjects with MDD (Craddock et al., 2009).
Functional neuroimaging data are typically rather noisy and high-dimensional. Therefore, different feature selection (FS) methods have been proposed to identify a subset of most informative features to be used with the aim to increase classification accuracy (Pereira et al., 2009). There is a fundamental distinction between FS approaches using prior knowledge (Chu et al., 2012) and data-driven methods, particularly filters or wrappers, that use the training dataset itself for FS (Pereira et al., 2009; Mwangi et al., 2013). Recent evidence from structural neuroimaging in dementia indicates that FS based on prior knowledge may be advantageous. In that report support vector machines (SVM) were used for classification (Chu et al., 2012). Such kernel methods like SVM are especially popular in recent attempts to classify fMRI datasets (Orru et al., 2012; Sundermann et al., 2014a).
There seems to be a substantive body of scientific studies on rs-fMRI in MDD now. However, methods of data analysis and results are very heterogeneous. Previous efforts to specifically summarize these rs-fMRI findings have focused on specificity and interpretability regarding disease mechanisms and therefore conducted rather exclusive study selection (only five rs-fMRI studies finally included) and pooled studies with SPECT and PET data (Kühn and Gallinat, 2013) or adopted qualitative methods of data synthesis (Wang et al., 2012b). Consequently, they are not optimally suited to select brain areas that contain particularly important information for FS used later to enable clinical differentiation in MDD by MVPA.
Purpose of this meta-analysis is to consolidate spatial information about alterations of spontaneous brain activity in patients with unipolar depression compared to healthy controls. This investigation is specifically intended to generate and make available “prior knowledge” that can be readily used as spatial hypotheses in rs-fMRI studies in MDD, particularly studies applying machine-learning methods for diagnostic classification. This includes but is not limited to pre-selection of features for diagnostic MVPA approaches. For this reason spatial precision and sensitivity are priorized over functional interpretability regarding exact disease mechanisms.
Materials and Methods
Identification and Selection of Relevant Studies
We conducted a PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) search using the following query on August 20, 2013: (“depression” OR “depressive”) AND (“fMRI” OR “functional MRI” OR “functional magnetic”) AND (“functional connectivity” OR “resting state” OR “resting-state”).
Initially, 183 results were identified. In addition, we also screened a recent review for further papers (Wang et al., 2012b) and a prior rather exclusive meta-analysis (Kühn and Gallinat, 2013) comprising rs-fMRI alterations in depression. Thereby six additional articles were identified. Titles and abstracts were manually screened twice (by two individuals) for studies (in English language) reporting results on rs-fMRI in adult patients with typical subtypes of unipolar depression (not adolescent, postpartum and late-life depression as well as studies that aimed at investigating a specific comorbidity) compared to healthy controls. Of these 51 studies identified, whole text versions were screened for studies fulfilling these criteria as well as including at least 10 subjects per group and reporting resulting coordinates of group comparisons (depression vs. healthy controls) in either MNI/ICBM (Mazziotta et al., 2001) or Talairach (1988) space. Thirty Two studies fulfilled these criteria and were therefore included in the final analyses. Studies by the same authors were screened for highly similar demographical characterization of samples and were otherwise considered independent in further analyses based on consensus of all three authors.
Reported maxima coordinates were extracted and, if reported in Talairach space, converted to MNI space using tal2icbm (Lancaster et al., 2007; Laird et al., 2010). As an exception, coordinates from one study (Lui et al., 2011) were transformed using tal2mni (Brett et al., 2001) as final coordinates in that study had initially been transformed using this method. Coordinates were assigned to two categories based on directionality of findings in order to avoid that clearly opposed findings in the original studies enhance each other in the ALE-analysis: group A comprises findings of decreased long distance or local connectivity (including lower correlation coefficients or lower regional homogeneity) or lower power of typical low frequency fluctuations representing spontaneous neural activity in depression compared to healthy controls and findings without clearly interpretable directionality information (Greicius et al., 2007; Bluhm et al., 2009; Yao et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2010, 2013a,b; Veer et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2010; Furman et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2011a,b, 2012a,b, 2013a,b,c; Hamilton et al., 2011; Lui et al., 2011; Peng et al., 2011, 2012; Wu et al., 2011; Ma et al., 2012, 2013; Wang et al., 2012a, 2013a,b; Ye et al., 2012; Zhu et al., 2012; Tang et al., 2013; Zeng et al., 2013). Details of these studies are presented in Table 1. Group B represents increased connectivity or low frequency fluctuations in depression compared to controls (Table 2) (Liu et al., 2010, 2013a,b; Sheline et al., 2010; Veer et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2010; Furman et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2011a,b, 2012b, 2013a,b; Hamilton et al., 2011; Wu et al., 2011; Cao et al., 2012; Ma et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012a, 2013a; Ye et al., 2012; Zhu et al., 2012).
Table 1. Studies in group A (representing mainly decreased connectivity/function in depression and ambiguous directionality).
Coordinate-based meta-analyses were calculated with GingerALE (Research Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA, version 2.3.1, http://www.brainmap.org/ale/) using the non-additive activation likelihood estimation (ALE) approach with coordinates organized by subject group (ALE-S method) to account for non-independent samples (Turkeltaub et al., 2012). ALE-S is an extension of the random effects ALE approach (Eickhoff et al., 2009) that prevents multiple experiments performed by one subject group from cumulatively influencing ALE values. Therefore, a modeled activation map is generated for each subject group independently based on published coordinates in a first step. These maps are then combined in a second step to calculate final ALE values (Turkeltaub et al., 2012). Coordinates in group A were assigned to 21, in group B to 17 presumably independent subjects groups as indicated in Tables 1, 2. Coordinates were masked using the conservative standard mask in Ginger ALE. 11 locations in group A and 7 locations in group B were located outside the mask while 305 (group A) and 132 (group B) foci remained inside. Study specific smoothing using a Gaussian kernel (group A: FWHM median = 9.17 mm, range 8.88–9.57 mm, group B: FWHM median = 9.28 mm, range 8.87–9.50 mm) was applied based on the mean sample size per subject group to take different sample sizes into account. Results were thresholded at p < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons using cluster-based correction with a cluster-forming threshold of p < 0.01 (uncorrected) and 1000 permutations (Eickhoff et al., 2012) resulting in a minimum cluster size of 528 mm3 in group A and 544 mm3 in group B. All analyses were calculated in MNI space.
Anatomical labels were automatically assigned in GingerALE. Visualizations were created using Mango (Research Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA, version 3.0.4, http://ric.uthscsa.edu/mango/) and a high resolution anatomical template with isotropic voxels in MNI space as distributed with GingerALE.
Decreased or Ambiguously Altered Spontaneous Functional Connectivity/Activity in MDD
Results of group A spatially converged mainly in the left superior/middle temporal gyrus and bilaterally in the insula, precuneus, superior frontal gyrus, lentiform nucleus and thalamus. For detailed results see Figures 1A,C and Table 3. Complete thresholded ALE-maps are made available in NIfTI-1 data format as Supplementary Material.
Figure 1. Areas of altered functional connectivity/activity in depression compared to controls. (A) Red to yellow: significant meta-analytic results (p < 0.05) in group A (representing mainly decreased connectivity / function in depression), blue to green: unthresholded ALE values, (B) equivalent representation of group B (increased connectivity/function in depression), (C) qualitative display of significant results, red: group A, green: group B, yellow: overlap.
Table 3. Brain areas (cluster-information and peak voxels) with significant convergence across studies in Group A (mainly decreased connectivity/activity in depression).
Increased Spontaneous Functional Connectivity/Activity in MDD
Findings in group B mainly comprised the pre-/subgenual anterior cingulate cortex and neighboring medial frontal cortex, the precuneus and neighboring posterior cingulate cortex, lateral prefrontal cortex bilaterally with a left predominance, left lateral parietal cortex as well as the right hippocampus and right cerebellum. Detailed results are presented in Figures 1B,C and Table 4. For thresholded ALE-maps see the Supplementary Material.
Table 4. Brain areas (cluster-information and peak voxels) with significant convergence across studies in Group B (increased connectivity/activity in depression).
The main purpose of this meta-analysis was to provide spatially precise information about locations of altered FC or local brain activity in patients with MDD compared to healthy controls. We will therefore first discuss how the resulting data can be used in subsequent studies including applications with diagnostic intention. This particularly refers to FS for diagnostic MVPA approaches.
Additionally, subordinate aspects related to the results will be discussed: this study is not primarily designed to elucidate the exact functional nature of alterations of spontaneous brain activity. However, in order to estimate what aspects of the disease mechanisms may be captured based on our results, it is important to understand how they relate to other neurobiological and particularly neuroimaging findings. Therefore, results will be compared with other functional imaging approaches and with findings from structural neuroimaging.
Results presented here can be treated as accessible prior knowledge about spatial locations of altered spontaneous brain activity in MDD. In particular this includes definition of regions of interest (ROIs) for hypothesis-driven group comparisons and particularly for FS (Pereira et al., 2009; Chu et al., 2012; Mwangi et al., 2013) in diagnostic classification efforts based on rs-fMRI data. For approaches using correlation based on seeds or pairs of regions of interest (Margulies et al., 2010), coordinates from Tables 3, 4 can be used directly. In addition, most software tools for voxel-based classification facilitate masking for FS (Schrouff et al., 2013). Therefore, NIfTI-files of thresholded ALE-maps in MNI space are provided (Supplementary Material).
In terms of classical RSNs several clusters of altered FC in MDD observed here correspond either to well-known midline structures as DMN subregions (Fox et al., 2005; Smith et al., 2009) or lateral frontal areas within a fronto-parietal network (Smith et al., 2009) associated with cognitive control (Niendam et al., 2012). It is therefore conceivable to use representations of established functional networks in the brain instead of the original results with the intention to enhance biological plausibility of analyses. Classical resting state networks (RSNs) cannot be quantitatively related to results of this meta-analysis with sufficient validity. Neither one of these single networks seems to comprehend “all” major meta-analytical findings nor do these point toward all major subregions of these networks in a qualitative comparison (see Supplementary Material for further details) despite the good correspondence of several single regions. Results may thus rather represent interactions between classical RSNs.
An exploratory qualitative comparison with spatial representations of recently introduced temporally independent functional modes (TFMs) of spontaneous brain activtiy (Smith et al., 2012) indicates a potentially better correspondence with meta-analytical results (Supplementary Material). However, we do not recommend selecting features for diagnostic classification in MDD based on single RSNs or TFMs at this point because there is only limited evidence for this available so far. This issue warrants further research.
To summarize, this analyses provides results intended to improve conceivable diagnostic classification approaches. But one should keep in mind that it cannot be concluded from the results that rs-fMRI will be clinically applicable in MDD.
Comparison of Results with Additional Neurobiological Findings in MDD
Functional neuroimaging and functional implications
Several studies of rs-fMRI in MDD did not fulfill the inclusion criteria, mostly because of missing coordinate data, but relate to the main meta-analytic findings. Outstanding examples of these studies are discussed here: in a study using independent component analyses (ICA) (Li et al., 2013) a distinction of the DMN into an anterior and a posterior component was addressed. Both showed increased FC before treatment. Differences in the posterior DMN were normalized after antidepressant treatment, while abnormal FC persisted within the anterior DMN (Li et al., 2013). This distinction potentially relates to the fact that only one of these components was significantly identified across studies. Zhang et al. adopted graph theoretical measures to study the topological organization on networks in MDD. Patients exhibited increased nodal centralities, predominately in the caudate nucleus and DMN as well as reduced nodal centralities in occipital, orbitofrontal and temporal regions (Zhang et al., 2011). In another recent rs-fMRI study, published after the date of study identification for this analysis, Sambataro et al. also highlight a differential involvement of DMN subsystems in MDD: patients exhibited increased connectivity of ventral, posterior and core DMN components. The interplay from the anterior to the ventral DMN subsystems was reduced (Sambataro et al., 2013). These findings are in line with meta-analytically observed increases in spontaneous activity in some but not all DMN subregions.
Brain activity at rest has also been studied using positron emission tomography (PET) or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) (Fitzgerald et al., 2008; Hamilton et al., 2012; Sacher et al., 2012). In contrast to rs-fMRI analyses these studies rarely adopt FC measures. In an ALE meta-analysis Fitzgerald et al. report a complex pattern of predominantly frontal alterations of brain activity featuring medial frontal hypoactivity, heterogenous findings regarding directionality of alterations in lateral frontal areas in both cerebral hemispheres and hyperactivity in the thalami (Fitzgerald et al., 2008). There is a fair spatial overlap with rs-fMRI findings but the directionality of alterations is not directly comparable. However, in an exclusive analysis of only four studies using 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET, regionally increased glucose metabolism was observed near the subgenual ACC (Sacher et al., 2012), an area of increased activity/connectivity observed by rs-fMRI. As a notable aspect, early results of single PET studies of increased brain activity in MDD in the subgenual ACC, orbitofrontal cortex, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, thalamus as well as the amygdala and less-markedly even medial parietal areas who have substantially informed current integrated neurocircuitry models of mood disorders (Price and Drevets, 2010) exhibit a better correspondence with rs-fMRI results than the meta-analytic reports of PET-studies in MDD. Thus, it seems desirable to investigate in further studies if features selected by rs-fMRT itself are better suited than PET-derived features that have been used in previous MVPA studies in MDD, for example (Craddock et al., 2009). However, this issue cannot be finally resolved at the moment as there is no consensus regarding optimal classification algorithms for diagnostic purposes (Sundermann et al., 2014a).
Generally the functional organization of the brain at rest highly resembles networks involved in responding to specific tasks (Smith et al., 2009). Despite a host of task-based fMRI studies in MDD so far, results cannot be summarized in one coherent model. Meta-analyses and systematic reviews on altered emotion and cognition in MDD by task-based neuroimaging exhibit moderate (Fitzgerald et al., 2008; Stuhrmann et al., 2011) or poor (Delvecchio et al., 2012) spatial overlap with findings in rs-fMRI reported here and no consistent alterations of activity in posterior DMN components or the subgenual ACC were reported. Thus, rs-fMRI seems to be better suited to depict these systems presumably involved in MDD pathophysiology. On the other hand, alterations of amygdala activity were not consistently observed in rs-fMRI. It has been highlighted, that even the directionality of amygdala activity is highly dependent on the emotional valence of stimuli (Groenewold et al., 2013). Therefore, this dynamical aspect of potential disease mechanisms in MDD may not be sufficiently captured by potential diagnostic classification efforts based on spontaneous activity only. Thus, relying on amygdala activity diagnostically may complicate the differentiation of patients with anxious comorbidity, which is an important symptom in a subset of patients with MDD (Kupfer et al., 2012).
Based on functional imaging results the involvement of the brain areas mainly altered during wakeful rest in MDD pathogenesis has been discussed as follows: the abnormal interplay of cortical midline structures associated with self-referential processing, emotion-related brain areas and lateral cortical areas related to higher cognitive processing has been functionally interpreted as a correlate of pathologically increased ruminative brooding in MDD. In particular, a reduced top-down inhibition of cortical midline and limbic regions has been discussed (Marchetti et al., 2012; Nejad et al., 2013).
Further lines of function-related research in MDD focus on genetic and metabolic alterations including neurotransmitters and therapeutic interventions (Kupfer et al., 2012). Findings of this meta-analysis can however not be directly related to these efforts because of the heterogeneity of samples and methods in the original studies. Still, knowledge of general relationships between rs-fMRI and neurotransmitter-systems may help further elucidate pathogenetic mechanisms in MDD in the future (Barkhof et al., 2014).
There are repeated reports about specific regional volume reductions in MDD affecting the basal ganglia, hippocampus, frontal lobe (including the orbitofrontal cortex) and less consistently the cingulate cortex and thalamus (Koolschijn et al., 2009; Lorenzetti et al., 2009; Kempton et al., 2011; Arnone et al., 2012; Sacher et al., 2012). These reported locations, based on anatomical descriptors, resemble a subset of findings in rs-fMRI, a strict formal comparison is not feasible as results were mostly not reported in a common coordinate space. Posterior midline structures, central locations of aberrant spontaneous brain activity in MDD, do not seem to be significantly affected by these volume reductions.
White matter microstructure as an important aspect of suspected network pathology in affective disorders has been studied using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and derivative techniques: reduced anisotropy measures, a potential marker of fiber integrity, were observed in parts of the superior frontal white matter presumed to connect the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex with subcortical nuclei (Sexton et al., 2009), the superior longitudinal fasciculus and increased anisotropy in the fronto-occipital fasciculus in MDD (Murphy and Frodl, 2011). The subgenual ACC associated with increased spontaneous activity/connectivity in this meta-analysis was identified as a potential site for therapeutic deep brain stimulation in MDD (Mayberg et al., 2005; Johansen-Berg et al., 2008; Lozano et al., 2008; Coenen et al., 2011). The structural connectivity of this area has been investigated using diffusion imaging as well, demonstrating widely distributed connectivity with frontal, limbic and visceromotor brain regions. An associated connectivity-based parcellation of the perigenual ACC revealed two distinct subdivisions, the pre- and the subgenual ACC (Johansen-Berg et al., 2008). The subgenual ACC observed in this meta-analysis of rs-fMRI data corresponds well with the latter location defined by distinct structural connectivity features (orbitofrontal cortex, medial temporal lobe and through the fornix) (Johansen-Berg et al., 2008).
Results of functional and structural imaging in MDD seem somewhat contradictory: some areas with increased spontaneous activity/functional connectivity seem to exhibit volume reduction or are served by white matter tracts with decreased anisotropy. Though functional and structural connectivity metrics show mostly concordant variations (Damoiseaux and Greicius, 2009; Honey et al., 2010), there are other examples of a similar paradox, e.g., in multiple sclerosis (Hawellek et al., 2011).
Limitations of the Current Analysis
The analysis predominantly provides information about spatial congruency of resting-state fMRI findings in depression. It does, however, not allow estimation of effect sizes. Information about the directionality or further details of mechanisms of supposed alterations of functional connectivity is limited. This is particularly caused by the significant heterogeneity of different post-processing methodologies used in the studies reviewed. While interpretation of directionality in most of these methods is well-established for the so-called default mode network (Van Dijk et al., 2010) this does not necessarily generalize to other networks. The number of studies with highly analogous methods was not sufficiently high to facilitate method-specific meta-analyses with adequate statistical power.
The ALE-approach adopted here relies on sufficiently reliable studies reporting results in terms of whole brain coordinates. Thus, not every study reporting relevant group comparison results based on rs-fMRI data in MDD could be included for this methodological reason. In seed- or ROI-based analyses (Margulies et al., 2010) the original seed coordinates less strictly reflect the spatial location of potentially associated alterations and could therefore not be included in this coordinate-based analysis. This may limit the sensitivity for alterations in such regions that have been regarded of special importance by the authors of the original studies. The generalizability of results to other samples is also limited by the heterogeneity of samples in the studies included as these range from first-episode medication naïve subjects to treatment resistant patients after multiple depressive episodes. However, the literature currently available does not seem to facilitate a more specific meta-analysis regarding these features yet. As stated above this meta-analysis primarily pursued a methodological goal and therefore emphasized spatial specificity.
All aforementioned aspects potentially reduce the overall statistical power of this meta-analysis. The number of so-called “contributing” subject groups—actually the number of subjects groups with coordinates within a resulting cluster is however not a straightforward marker of statistical power in this setting as there is a complex relationship with cluster size. Figures 1A,B jointly depict statistically significant results and the distributions of raw ALE values in both groups. This gives an impression of the heterogeneity of the original results in both groups. This heterogeneity implies that alterations of FC or spontaneous brain activity are not a highly robust finding across different samples and methodological choices. This has to be taken into account when trying to make conclusions about actual disease mechanisms based on these results. In contrast to an earlier meta-analysis of rs-fMRI in MDD (Kühn and Gallinat, 2013), the main purpose of this study was feature selection for conceivable diagnostic classification by MVPA. To briefly reiterate, this means to identify a set of brain areas that contain potentially discriminative information to differentiate MDD patients from controls. Such feature selection is intended to reduce data dimensionality and discard irrelevant information in order to improve the diagnostic accuracy of classification approaches (Pereira et al., 2009; Mwangi et al., 2013; Sundermann et al., 2014a). Aggregating prior knowledge from the literature is a commonly applied feature selection step (Chu et al., 2012; Schrouff et al., 2013). Type II errors in such a preparatory meta-analysis can be much more problematic than limited type I errors. Missing important brain areas discriminating subjects with MDD from controls might reduce diagnostic accuracy. Owing to the (however not unlimited) ability of classification algorithms to identify and highlight most discriminative information (Pereira et al., 2009), a limited amount of false positive results in the definition of regions of interest or masks could potentially be better compensated for. There is no established standard for setting multiple comparison correction thresholds in ALE analyses yet as it is highly dependent on the number of studies and data distribution (Eickhoff et al., 2012). This issue is however much more problematic in meta-analyses that are primarily intended to elucidate disease mechanisms.
Multiple reports based on the same or similar data and overlapping samples are a generic problem in meta-analyses (Littell et al., 2008). In this work a recent modification of the ALE method (Turkeltaub et al., 2012) was adopted to minimize within-group effects of potentially overlapping samples without sacrificing valuable information. Despite that, it cannot be fully excluded that there is residual overlap of samples in studies considered independent here. However, we adopted a consensus based approach involving three reviewers to reduce this potential bias.
Even despite this issue the recent literature on rs-fMRI in MDD displays a noticeable tendency toward particular Asian as well as North American or European populations. As prevalence and clinical symptomatology differ significantly between cultural contexts (Kirmayer, 2001; Halbreich et al., 2007; Juhasz et al., 2012; Yeung and Chang, 2014) results reported in this meta-analysis may not necessarily be applicable to other populations.
Due to the different informational content a quantitative comparison with RSNs and TFMs, such as a formal conjunction analysis, was not feasible.
This meta-analysis focused on comparisons of depressive subjects and healthy controls. However, it seems to be even more desirable to identify differential neuroimaging biomarkers that provide information about individual prognosis or guide therapeutic decisions (Mossner et al., 2007; Sundermann et al., 2014a). Feature (pre-)selection for such efforts may be optimized specifically in the future as soon as further rs-fMRI research in these situations becomes available.
This meta-analysis of resting-state fMRI studies in depression has identified a distributed pattern of brain regions with increased or decreased spontaneous activity compared to healthy controls. The most distinct finding is hyperactivity or hyperconnectivity presumably reflecting the interaction of midline structures (particulary posterior DMN components associated with self-referential processing and the subgenual ACC) with lateral frontal areas related to externally-directed cognition. Alterations that can be captured by rs-fMRI seem to differ from those identifiable with other neuroimaging modalities but show considerable overlap. Results of this meta-analysis are provided as coordinates and detailed maps in MNI space to be readily applicable for ROI selection in further rs-fMRI studies in MDD including feature selection for classification approaches with diagnostic intention. By emphasizing spatial precision and sensitivity this approach only provides limited information about the exact functional meaning of altered spontaneous brain activity in MDD.
Benedikt Sundermann and Bettina Pfleiderer conceived and designed the study. Mona Olde lütke Beverborg and Benedikt Sundermann identified and screened the articles. Benedikt Sundermann, Bettina Pfleiderer and Mona Olde lütke Beverborg participated in final study selection and group assignment. Benedikt Sundermann and Mona Olde lütke Beverborg conducted the ALE-analyses. Benedikt Sundermann, Bettina Pfleiderer and Mona Olde lütke Beverborg participated in interpretation of the results. Benedikt Sundermann drafted the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final version.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
We acknowledge support by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Münster. This final article as a whole builds upon our preprint version of this work (Sundermann et al., 2014b).
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://www.frontiersin.org/journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00692/abstract
Arnone, D., McIntosh, A. M., Ebmeier, K. P., Munafo, M. R., and Anderson, I. M. (2012). Magnetic resonance imaging studies in unipolar depression: systematic review and meta-regression analyses. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 22, 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.05.003
Atluri, G., Padmanabhan, K., Fang, G., Steinbach, M., Petrella, J. R., Lim, K., et al. (2013). Complex biomarker discovery in neuroimaging data: finding a needle in a haystack. Neuroimage Clin. 3, 123–131. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.07.004
Bluhm, R., Williamson, P., Lanius, R., Theberge, J., Densmore, M., Bartha, R., et al. (2009). Resting state default-mode network connectivity in early depression using a seed region-of-interest analysis: decreased connectivity with caudate nucleus. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 63, 754–761. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2009.02030.x
Cao, X., Liu, Z., Xu, C., Li, J., Gao, Q., Sun, N., et al. (2012). Disrupted resting-state functional connectivity of the hippocampus in medication-naive patients with major depressive disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 141, 194–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.002
Chetelat, G., Landeau, B., Salmon, E., Yakushev, I., Bahri, M. A., Mezenge, F., et al. (2013). Relationships between brain metabolism decrease in normal aging and changes in structural and functional connectivity. Neuroimage 76, 167–177. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.009
Chu, C., Hsu, A. L., Chou, K. H., Bandettini, P., Lin, C., and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. (2012). Does feature selection improve classification accuracy? Impact of sample size and feature selection on classification using anatomical magnetic resonance images. Neuroimage 60, 59–70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.066
Coenen, V. A., Schlaepfer, T. E., Maedler, B., and Panksepp, J. (2011). Cross-species affective functions of the medial forebrain bundle-implications for the treatment of affective pain and depression in humans. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35, 1971–1981. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.12.009
Craddock, R. C., Holtzheimer, P. E. 3rd., Hu, X. P., and Mayberg, H. S. (2009). Disease state prediction from resting state functional connectivity. Magn. Reson. Med. 62, 1619–1628. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22159
Damoiseaux, J. S., and Greicius, M. D. (2009). Greater than the sum of its parts: a review of studies combining structural connectivity and resting-state functional connectivity. Brain Struct. Funct. 213, 525–533. doi: 10.1007/s00429-009-0208-6
Delvecchio, G., Fossati, P., Boyer, P., Brambilla, P., Falkai, P., Gruber, O., et al. (2012). Common and distinct neural correlates of emotional processing in bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: a voxel-based meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 22, 100–113. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.07.003
Diener, C., Kuehner, C., Brusniak, W., Ubl, B., Wessa, M., and Flor, H. (2012). A meta-analysis of neurofunctional imaging studies of emotion and cognition in major depression. Neuroimage 61, 677–685. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.005
Eickhoff, S. B., Laird, A. R., Grefkes, C., Wang, L. E., Zilles, K., and Fox, P. T. (2009). Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 2907–2926. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20718
Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Corbetta, M., Van Essen, D. C., and Raichle, M. E. (2005). The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 9673–9678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504136102
Greicius, M. D., Flores, B. H., Menon, V., Glover, G. H., Solvason, H. B., Kenna, H., et al. (2007). Resting-state functional connectivity in major depression: abnormally increased contributions from subgenual cingulate cortex and thalamus. Biol. Psychiatry 62, 429–437. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.020
Groenewold, N. A., Opmeer, E. M., de Jonge, P., Aleman, A., and Costafreda, S. G. (2013). Emotional valence modulates brain functional abnormalities in depression: evidence from a meta-analysis of fMRI studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 152–163. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.015
Guo, W., Liu, F., Dai, Y., Jiang, M., Zhang, J., Yu, L., et al. (2013a). Decreased interhemispheric resting-state functional connectivity in first-episode, drug-naive major depressive disorder. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 41, 24–29. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.11.003
Guo, W., Liu, F., Liu, J., Yu, L., Zhang, Z., Zhang, J., et al. (2013b). Is there a cerebellar compensatory effort in first-episode, treatment-naive major depressive disorder at rest? Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 46, 13–18. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.06.009
Guo, W., Liu, F., Xue, Z., Gao, K., Liu, Z., Xiao, C., et al. (2013c). Decreased interhemispheric coordination in treatment-resistant depression: a resting-state fMRI study. PLoS ONE 8:e71368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071368
Guo, W. B., Liu, F., Chen, J. D., Gao, K., Xue, Z. M., Xu, X. J., et al. (2012a). Abnormal neural activity of brain regions in treatment-resistant and treatment-sensitive major depressive disorder: a resting-state fMRI study. J. Psychiatr. Res. 46, 1366–1373. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.07.003
Guo, W. B., Liu, F., Xue, Z. M., Xu, X. J., Wu, R. R., Ma, C. Q., et al. (2012b). Alterations of the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations in treatment-resistant and treatment-response depression: a resting-state fMRI study. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 37, 153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.01.011
Guo, W. B., Liu, F., Xue, Z. M., Yu, Y., Ma, C. Q., Tan, C. L., et al. (2011a). Abnormal neural activities in first-episode, treatment-naive, short-illness-duration, and treatment-response patients with major depressive disorder: a resting-state fMRI study. J. Affect. Disord. 135, 326–331. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.06.048
Guo, W. B., Sun, X. L., Liu, L., Xu, Q., Wu, R. R., Liu, Z. N., et al. (2011b). Disrupted regional homogeneity in treatment-resistant depression: a resting-state fMRI study. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 35, 1297–1302. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2011.02.006
Halbreich, U., Alarcon, R. D., Calil, H., Douki, S., Gaszner, P., Jadresic, E., et al. (2007). Culturally-sensitive complaints of depressions and anxieties in women. J. Affect. Disord. 102, 159–176. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.09.033
Haller, S., Lovblad, K. O., Giannakopoulos, P., and Van De Ville, D. (2014). Multivariate pattern recognition for diagnosis and prognosis in clinical neuroimaging: state of the art, current challenges and future trends. Brain Topogr. 27, 329–337. doi: 10.1007/s10548-014-0360-z
Hamilton, J. P., Chen, G., Thomason, M. E., Schwartz, M. E., and Gotlib, I. H. (2011). Investigating neural primacy in major depressive disorder: multivariate granger causality analysis of resting-state fMRI time-series data. Mol. Psychiatry 16, 763–772. doi: 10.1038/mp.2010.46
Hamilton, J. P., Etkin, A., Furman, D. J., Lemus, M. G., Johnson, R. F., and Gotlib, I. H. (2012). Functional neuroimaging of major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis and new integration of base line activation and neural response data. Am. J. Psychiatry 169, 693–703. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11071105
Hawellek, D. J., Hipp, J. F., Lewis, C. M., Corbetta, M., and Engel, A. K. (2011). Increased functional connectivity indicates the severity of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 19066–19071. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110024108
Johansen-Berg, H., Gutman, D. A., Behrens, T. E., Matthews, P. M., Rushworth, M. F., Katz, E., et al. (2008). Anatomical connectivity of the subgenual cingulate region targeted with deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Cereb. Cortex 18, 1374–1383. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm167
Kempton, M. J., Salvador, Z., Munafo, M. R., Geddes, J. R., Simmons, A., Frangou, S., et al. (2011). Structural neuroimaging studies in major depressive disorder. Meta-analysis and comparison with bipolar disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 68, 675–690. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.60
Kirmayer, L. J. (2001). Cultural variations in the clinical presentation of depression and anxiety: implications for diagnosis and treatment. J. Clin. Psychiatry 62(Suppl. 13), 22–28. discussion: 29–30.
Klöppel, S., Abdulkadir, A., Jack, C. R. Jr., Koutsouleris, N., Mourao-Miranda, J., and Vemuri, P. (2011). Diagnostic neuroimaging across diseases. Neuroimage 61, 457–463. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.002
Koolschijn, P. C., van Haren, N. E., Lensvelt-Mulders, G. J., Hulshoff Pol, H. E., and Kahn, R. S. (2009). Brain volume abnormalities in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 3719–3735. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20801
Laird, A. R., Robinson, J. L., McMillan, K. M., Tordesillas-Gutierrez, D., Moran, S. T., Gonzales, S. M., et al. (2010). Comparison of the disparity between Talairach and MNI coordinates in functional neuroimaging data: validation of the Lancaster transform. Neuroimage 51, 677–683. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.048
Lancaster, J. L., Tordesillas-Gutierrez, D., Martinez, M., Salinas, F., Evans, A., Zilles, K., et al. (2007). Bias between MNI and Talairach coordinates analyzed using the ICBM-152 brain template. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28, 1194–1205. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20345
Li, B., Liu, L., Friston, K. J., Shen, H., Wang, L., Zeng, L. L., et al. (2013). A treatment-resistant default mode subnetwork in major depression. Biol. Psychiatry 74, 48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.11.007
Liu, C. H., Ma, X., Wu, X., Fan, T. T., Zhang, Y., Zhou, F. C., et al. (2013a). Resting-state brain activity in major depressive disorder patients and their siblings. J. Affect. Disord. 149, 299–306. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.02.002
Liu, F., Guo, W., Liu, L., Long, Z., Ma, C., Xue, Z., et al. (2013b). Abnormal amplitude low-frequency oscillations in medication-naive, first-episode patients with major depressive disorder: a resting-state fMRI study. J. Affect. Disord. 146, 401–406. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.10.001
Liu, Z., Xu, C., Xu, Y., Wang, Y., Zhao, B., Lv, Y., et al. (2010). Decreased regional homogeneity in insula and cerebellum: a resting-state fMRI study in patients with major depression and subjects at high risk for major depression. Psychiatry Res. 182, 211–215. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.03.004
Lorenzetti, V., Allen, N. B., Fornito, A., and Yucel, M. (2009). Structural brain abnormalities in major depressive disorder: a selective review of recent MRI studies. J. Affect. Disord. 117, 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.11.021
Lozano, A. M., Mayberg, H. S., Giacobbe, P., Hamani, C., Craddock, R. C., and Kennedy, S. H. (2008). Subcallosal cingulate gyrus deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Biol. Psychiatry 64, 461–467. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.05.034
Lui, S., Wu, Q., Qiu, L., Yang, X., Kuang, W., Chan, R. C., et al. (2011). Resting-state functional connectivity in treatment-resistant depression. Am. J. Psychiatry 168, 642–648. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10101419
Ma, C., Ding, J., Li, J., Guo, W., Long, Z., Liu, F., et al. (2012). Resting-state functional connectivity bias of middle temporal gyrus and caudate with altered gray matter volume in major depression. PLoS ONE 7:e45263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045263
Ma, Q., Zeng, L. L., Shen, H., Liu, L., and Hu, D. (2013). Altered cerebellar-cerebral resting-state functional connectivity reliably identifies major depressive disorder. Brain Res. 1495, 86–94. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.12.002
Marchetti, I., Koster, E. H., Sonuga-Barke, E. J., and De Raedt, R. (2012). The default mode network and recurrent depression: a neurobiological model of cognitive risk factors. Neuropsychol. Rev. 22, 229–251. doi: 10.1007/s11065-012-9199-9
Margulies, D. S., Bottger, J., Long, X., Lv, Y., Kelly, C., Schafer, A., et al. (2010). Resting developments: a review of fMRI post-processing methodologies for spontaneous brain activity. MAGMA 23, 289–307. doi: 10.1007/s10334-010-0228-5
Mayberg, H. S., Lozano, A. M., Voon, V., McNeely, H. E., Seminowicz, D., Hamani, C., et al. (2005). Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Neuron 45, 651–660. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.02.014
Mazziotta, J., Toga, A., Evans, A., Fox, P., Lancaster, J., Zilles, K., et al. (2001). A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: international CONsortium for brain mapping (ICBM). Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 356, 1293–1322. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0915
Mossner, R., Mikova, O., Koutsilieri, E., Saoud, M., Ehlis, A. C., Muller, N., et al. (2007). Consensus paper of the WFSBP task force on biological markers: biological markers in depression. World J. Biol. Psychiatry 8, 141–174. doi: 10.1080/15622970701263303
Murphy, M. L., and Frodl, T. (2011). Meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging studies shows altered fractional anisotropy occurring in distinct brain areas in association with depression. Biol. Mood Anxiety Disord. 1:3. doi: 10.1186/2045-5380-1-3
Nejad, A. B., Fossati, P., and Lemogne, C. (2013). Self-referential processing, rumination, and cortical midline structures in major depression. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:666. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00666
Niendam, T. A., Laird, A. R., Ray, K. L., Dean, Y. M., Glahn, D. C., and Carter, C. S. (2012). Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 12, 241–268. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0083-5
Orru, G., Pettersson-Yeo, W., Marquand, A. F., Sartori, G., and Mechelli, A. (2012). Using support vector machine to identify imaging biomarkers of neurological and psychiatric disease: a critical review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36, 1140–1152. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.01.004
Peng, D. H., Jiang, K. D., Fang, Y. R., Xu, Y. F., Shen, T., Long, X. Y., et al. (2011). Decreased regional homogeneity in major depression as revealed by resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.) 124, 369–373.
Peng, D. H., Shen, T., Zhang, J., Huang, J., Liu, J., Liu, S. Y., et al. (2012). Abnormal functional connectivity with mood regulating circuit in unmedicated individual with major depression: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance study. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.) 125, 3701–3706.
Riedl, V., Bienkowska, K., Strobel, C., Tahmasian, M., Grimmer, T., Forster, S., et al. (2014). Local activity determines functional connectivity in the resting human brain: a simultaneous FDG-PET/fMRI study. J. Neurosci. 34, 6260–6266. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.0492-14.2014
Sacher, J., Neumann, J., Funfstuck, T., Soliman, A., Villringer, A., and Schroeter, M. L. (2012). Mapping the depressed brain: a meta-analysis of structural and functional alterations in major depressive disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 140, 142–148. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.08.001
Sambataro, F., Wolf, N. D., Pennuto, M., Vasic, N., and Wolf, R. C. (2013). Revisiting default mode network function in major depression: evidence for disrupted subsystem connectivity. Psychol. Med. 44, 2041–2051. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713002596
Schrouff, J., Rosa, M. J., Rondina, J. M., Marquand, A. F., Chu, C., Ashburner, J., et al. (2013). PRoNTo: pattern recognition for neuroimaging toolbox. Neuroinformatics 11, 319–337. doi: 10.1007/s12021-013-9178-1
Sexton, C. E., Mackay, C. E., and Ebmeier, K. P. (2009). A systematic review of diffusion tensor imaging studies in affective disorders. Biol. Psychiatry 66, 814–823. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.05.024
Sheline, Y. I., Price, J. L., Yan, Z., and Mintun, M. A. (2010). Resting-state functional MRI in depression unmasks increased connectivity between networks via the dorsal nexus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 11020–11025. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000446107
Smith, S. M., Fox, P. T., Miller, K. L., Glahn, D. C., Fox, P. M., Mackay, C. E., et al. (2009). Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 13040–13045. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905267106
Smith, S. M., Miller, K. L., Moeller, S., Xu, J., Auerbach, E. J., Woolrich, M. W., et al. (2012). Temporally-independent functional modes of spontaneous brain activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 3131–3136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1121329109
Stuhrmann, A., Suslow, T., and Dannlowski, U. (2011). Facial emotion processing in major depression: a systematic review of neuroimaging findings. Biol. Mood Anxiety Disord. 1:10. doi: 10.1186/2045-5380-1-10
Sundermann, B., Herr, D., Schwindt, W., and Pfleiderer, B. (2014a). Multivariate classification of blood oxygen level-dependent FMRI data with diagnostic intention: a clinical perspective. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 35, 848–855. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3713
Sundermann, B., Olde lütke Beverborg, M., and Pfleiderer, B. (2014b). Meta-analysis of resting-state fMRI in depression: generating spatial hypotheses for potential clinical applications. PeerJ PrePrints 2:e412v1. doi: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.412v1
Tang, Y., Kong, L., Wu, F., Womer, F., Jiang, W., Cao, Y., et al. (2013). Decreased functional connectivity between the amygdala and the left ventral prefrontal cortex in treatment-naive patients with major depressive disorder: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Psychol. Med. 43, 1921–1927. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712002759
Turkeltaub, P. E., Eickhoff, S. B., Laird, A. R., Fox, M., Wiener, M., and Fox, P. (2012). Minimizing within-experiment and within-group effects in activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses. Hum. Brain Mapp. 33, 1–13. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21186
van den Heuvel, M. P., and Hulshoff Pol, H. E. (2010). Exploring the brain network: a review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 20, 519–534. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.03.008
Van Dijk, K. R., Hedden, T., Venkataraman, A., Evans, K. C., Lazar, S. W., and Buckner, R. L. (2010). Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization. J. Neurophysiol. 103, 297–321. doi: 10.1152/jn.00783.2009
Veer, I. M., Beckmann, C. F., van Tol, M. J., Ferrarini, L., Milles, J., Veltman, D. J., et al. (2010). Whole brain resting-state analysis reveals decreased functional connectivity in major depression. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 4:41. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00041
Wang, L., Dai, W., Su, Y., Wang, G., Tan, Y., Jin, Z., et al. (2012a). Amplitude of low-frequency oscillations in first-episode, treatment-naive patients with major depressive disorder: a resting-state functional MRI study. PLoS ONE 7:e48658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048658
Wang, L., Hermens, D. F., Hickie, I. B., and Lagopoulos, J. (2012b). A systematic review of resting-state functional-MRI studies in major depression. J. Affect. Disord. 142, 6–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.04.013
Wang, L., Li, K., Zhang, Q., Zeng, Y., Dai, W., Su, Y., et al. (2013a). Short-term effects of escitalopram on regional brain function in first-episode drug-naive patients with major depressive disorder assessed by resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Psychol. Med. 44, 1417–1426. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713002031
Wang, L., Li, K., Zhang, Q. E., Zeng, Y. W., Jin, Z., Dai, W. J., et al. (2013b). Interhemispheric functional connectivity and its relationships with clinical characteristics in major depressive disorder: a resting state fMRI study. PLoS ONE 8:e60191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060191
Wu, Q. Z., Li, D. M., Kuang, W. H., Zhang, T. J., Lui, S., Huang, X. Q., et al. (2011). Abnormal regional spontaneous neural activity in treatment-refractory depression revealed by resting-state fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 32, 1290–1299. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21108
Yao, Z., Wang, L., Lu, Q., Liu, H., and Teng, G. (2009). Regional homogeneity in depression and its relationship with separate depressive symptom clusters: a resting-state fMRI study. J. Affect. Disord. 115, 430–438. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.10.013
Ye, T., Peng, J., Nie, B., Gao, J., Liu, J., Li, Y., et al. (2012). Altered functional connectivity of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in first-episode patients with major depressive disorder. Eur. J. Radiol. 81, 4035–4040. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.058
Zarogianni, E., Moorhead, T. W., and Lawrie, S. M. (2013). Towards the identification of imaging biomarkers in schizophrenia, using multivariate pattern classification at a single-subject level. Neuroimage Clin. 3, 279–289. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.09.003
Zhang, J., Wang, J., Wu, Q., Kuang, W., Huang, X., He, Y., et al. (2011). Disrupted brain connectivity networks in drug-naive, first-episode major depressive disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 70, 334–342. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.05.018
Zhou, Y., Yu, C., Zheng, H., Liu, Y., Song, M., Qin, W., et al. (2010). Increased neural resources recruitment in the intrinsic organization in major depression. J. Affect. Disord. 121, 220–230. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.05.029
Zhu, X., Wang, X., Xiao, J., Liao, J., Zhong, M., Wang, W., et al. (2012). Evidence of a dissociation pattern in resting-state default mode network connectivity in first-episode, treatment-naive major depression patients. Biol. Psychiatry 71, 611–617. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.10.035
Keywords: depression, depressive disorder, functional neuroimaging, magnetic resonance imaging, meta-analysis, feature selection
Citation: Sundermann B, Olde lütke Beverborg M and Pfleiderer B (2014) Toward literature-based feature selection for diagnostic classification: a meta-analysis of resting-state fMRI in depression. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:692. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00692
Received: 06 June 2014; Accepted: 19 August 2014;
Published online: 10 September 2014.
Edited by:Shuhei Yamaguchi, Shimane University, Japan
Reviewed by:Daniel Anthony Fitzgerald, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA
Keiichi Onoda, Shimane University, Japan
Copyright © 2014 Sundermann, Olde lütke Beverborg and Pfleiderer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Benedikt Sundermann, Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A1, 48149 Münster, Germany e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org