This article is a commentary on:
The role of action representations in thematic object relations
Konstantinos Tsagkaridis
Christine E. Watson
Steven A. Jax
Laurel J. Buxbaum- 1Department of Psychology, School of Humanities and Health Sciences, Neapolis University Pafos, Pafos, Cyprus
- 2Cognition and Action Laboratory, Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- 3Perceptual-Motor Control Laboratory, Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA, USA
A corrigendum on
The role of action representations in thematic object relations
by Tsagkaridis, K., Watson, C. E., Jax, S. A., and Buxbaum, L. J. (2014) Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:140. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00140
We wish to correct a typo on page 7, in the last paragraph of the RESULTS section called “Choice Data” and just before the beginning of the paragraph called “Modeling choices based on object pair ratings-Group differences.”
The mistake is in lines 3 and 5 of this paragraph in the PDF version of the article, where the printed name Th-A should be changed to Th+A. The term Th-A in the last line of the paragraph is correct.
For this correction, the whole paragraph should be written as follows:
“In short, these analyses revealed that when we considered Th+A vs. Th-A triads in particular, Posterior patients were less likely to choose the Th+A pair relative to controls. Posterior patients also tended to be less likely than Anterior patients to choose the Th+A option, though this difference was only marginally significant. Finally, Posterior participants made more Th-A choices overall relative to Controls.”
Original article has been updated.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by an NIH award R01 NS065049 and James S. McDonnell Foundation award #220020190 to LB.
Keywords: semantic, action, thematic, taxonomic, apraxia, stroke, embodied cognition, object relations
Citation: Tsagkaridis K, Watson CE, Jax SA and Buxbaum LJ (2015) Corrigendum: The role of action representations in thematic object relations. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9:548. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00548
Received: 19 August 2015; Accepted: 18 September 2015;
Published: 29 September 2015.
Edited and reviewed by: Hauke R. Heekeren, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany
Copyright © 2015 Tsagkaridis, Watson, Jax and Buxbaum. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Konstantinos Tsagkaridis, k.tsagkaridis@nup.ac.cy;
Laurel J. Buxbaum, lbuxbaum@einstein.edu